Appendix C Summary form
|
|
- Irene Rich
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Appendix C Sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Comment 1: the draft remit Appropriateness Patients with HCC have a poor prognosis, with a life expectancy of 3-6 months if unresectable. For those patients where surgical or locoregional therapies have failed or are unsuitable sorafenib is the only systemic treatment that has proved to prolong survival compared to best supportive care alone. This is an appropriate topic. Sorafenib has an increasing profile locally and the incidence of hepatitis B and C is likely to rise which in turn will increase the incidence of this cancer. According to a debate in the House of Commons on it was stated that in the year 2000 liver disease killed more men than Parkinson's disease and more women than cancer of the cervix and we understand that the Government is investigating the possibility of developing a strategy for liver disease. HCC accounts for percent of all the cases of primary liver tumours. It is wholly appropriate that NICE should be considering relevant drugs at this time. Sorafenib is indicated for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. It is suitable for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are unsuitable for or have progressed after surgical or locoregional therapies. Wording
2 Timing Issues We would like to see consideration of the use of this therapy at all appropriate stages of the disease. Proposed wording - To appraise the clinical and cost effectiveness of sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma If the issues of clinical cost and effectiveness of this technology are to be judged fairly then it is vital that relevant and up to date figures regarding prevelance are used and this background paper does use these figures. Patients who have failed or who are unsuitable for surgical or loco-regional therpaies have a poor prognosis. If left untreated these patients would only have 3-6 months to live. Sorafenib has been shown to extend survival versus best supportive care by 44% (HR=0.698; p= ). This is a relatively rare cancer in the UK and there is a high unmet and urgent clinical need for this patient group. We would like to have final guidance within 12 months. As liver cancer is growing the need for this treatment is urgently needed. This issue was discussed at the scoping workshop and consultees agreed that the remit of the appraisal should be restricted to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are unsuitable for or have progressed after surgical or locoregional therapies. Scope amended. It should also be noted that prevalence figures are not expected to impact on the cost effectiveness of this technology.
3 Additional comments on the draft remit Comment 2: the draft scope It would be helpful if not more professional if NICE referenced its material in the same manner that patient organisations and indeed manufacturers are oblidged to. This will would help with the accuracy of these papers. Definition of the cases that would mertit treatment by Sorafenib needs to be much clearer. For instance, the first line of treatment when tumours are small (< 5cm in diameter) is by ablation techniques and with these cure can be obtained. New tumours, however, may develop in the liver and effective chemotherpay to prevent this, ie, the use of Sorafenib could represent an effective use. Survival in HCC cases is also largly effected by severity of the underlying cirrhosis, ie, Child Grade C cases even with small tumours have very poor outlook. Use of Sorafenib therefore needs to be related to functional category of underlying cirrhosis. All evidence used in the appraisal phase is clearly referenced. The purpose of the scope is to define the questions to be asked. The suggestions made were taken in consideration and, if evidence permits, the appraisal will seek to identify subgroups of individuals for whom sorafenib may be particularly clinically and cost effective. Background information When referring to systemic therapy it should be noted that various reviews, meta-analyses and systematic reviews published over the past decade conclude that no anti-cancer treatment has clearly been identified as either a gold standard or to demonstrably improve overall survival. For these reason may patients receive palliative care. Adequate for our purposes. This issue was discussed at the scoping workshop and consultees have agreed that the comparator should be standard care which may include doxorubicin, cisplatin or biological agents depending on performance status and disease severity
4 The technology/ intervention You state "Approximately 2,000 new cases of hepatocellular carcinoma are diagnosed in England and Wales per year. However, it is thought that the incidence will increase in the next years mainly as a result of the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infections." This statement ignores the rising prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the UK population. In Rising Curve: Chronic Infection in the UK, estimates that there are around 326,000 people with chronic HBV infection in the UK (November 2007). The majority of these people are migrants who acquired the infection at a young age (at birth or in childhood). It is therefore likely that, in the future, indeed the near furture hepatocellular carcinoma related to chronic HBV infection will affect younger people and the average age of diagnosis will fall. Sorafenib has a marketing authorisation for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have failed prior interferon-alpha or interleukin-2 based therapy, or are considered unsuitable for such therapy. Sorafenib is also licensed for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sorafenib has been studied in clinical trials in people with hepatocellular carcinoma with advanced stage disease who had not received previous systemic therapy, a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, Child-Pugh A & B and ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2, adequate organ function and measurable tumours. Yes, the description of the technology is appropriate. The description of the technology is not accurate as it is our understanding that from 5/11/07 specialists in the UK were able to prescribe this treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common form of primary liver cancer, who are unsuitable for loco-regional therapies. Sorafenib), an oral treatment, was approved by the EMEA and is licensed for the treatment of patients with HCC. It could be that the agent is even more effective when started at an earlier stage when the tumour mass is small. Comment noted and scope amended accordingly.
5 Population Comparators The relevant population is patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are unsuitable for or have progressed after surgical or locoregional therapies. In our opinion, population is not defined appropriately. Given that the marketing authorisation for sorafenib states that the drug "is indicated for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma" we feel it would be unhelpful to restrict NICE's appraisal only to patients who have had no previous local therapy. Those who develop liver cancer are more likely to do so due to hepatocellular infection and importantly hepatitis B. These people are usually those who were born abroad or whose mothers were born abroad and there needs to be equality of treatments for this patient group The different functional categories of cirrhosis and different size with widely differing natural histories are important considerations in the use of this new agent with greater chemotherapeutic efficacy in HCC. The relevant comparator is best supportive (palliative) care. Various reviews, meta-analyses and sytematic reviews published over the past decade conclude that no anti-cancer treatment has clearly been identified as either a gold standard or to demonstrably improve overall survival. This drug is only approved for primary liver cancer for those unsuitable for locoregional therapies and so all the comparators do not compare. Comment noted and scope amended following discussion in the scoping workshop. Comment noted and scope amended following discussion in the scoping workshop. The suggestions made were taken in consideration and, if evidence permits, the appraisal will seek to identify subgroups of individuals for whom sorafenib may be particularly clinically and cost effective. Following the discussion in the scoping workshop the comparator was amended to standard care which may include doxorubicin, cisplatin or biological agents depending on performance status and disease severity.
6 Outcomes Economic analysis Equality Other considerations Yes, stated outcomes will capture the most important health related benefits (and harms) of the technology. QALY for liver cancer treatment will be difficult but, as liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third most common cause of death from cancer worldwide and many of these people now live and work in the country, treatments are needed. In addition, it is important to note that this is oral therapy and the cost of delivering this therapy as compared to day patient care should be considered Agree with what is outlined in scope. Time horizon is always too long. We need guidance to be explicit about those groups of patients who may receive greatest clinical benefit - which might include age. The patient group is likely to be from a BME migrant worker group and frequently that is in deprived areas this treatment should promote equality of service We agree that the appraisal should seek to identify sub-groups of individuals for whom sorafenib may be more clinically and cost effective. This drug is licensed. The appraisal will take into consideration all the characteristics of the technology within the standard methods currently used by NICE.
7 Questions for consultation Additional comments on the draft scope. Already patients are being recommended for use of this agent when other treatment measures have failed. Please ensure correct potential patient figures based on recent prevelance studies are considered Many more patients are being diagnosed with an early stage of HCC by regular ultrasound surveillance follow-up. The place of chemotherapy with sorafenib needs the most careful consideration. Previously chemotherapeutic agents had little efficacy and their use has declined to a major extent in recent years, because of lack of efficacy and also of severity of side effects particularly with those with Child B and C categories of cirrhosis. Comment 4: Regulatory issues Section Consultees Comments Action Remit Sorafenib (Nexavar) is indicated for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on the trial evidence it is suitable for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are unsuitable for or have progressed after surgical or locoregional therapies. Current or proposed marketing authorisation Sorafenib is licensed for the use in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have failed prior interferon-alpha or interleukin-2 based therapy, or are considered unsuitable for such therapy. Sorafenib is also licensed for the treatment of heapatocellular carcinoma. Sorafenib is also under investigation for non small cell lung cancer and target date for centralised regulatory submission is xxxx. The following consultees/commentators indicated that they had no comments on the draft remit and/or the draft scope Department of Health NHS Quality Improvement Scotland
8 National Public Health Service for Wales Board of Community Health Councils in Wales British Liver Nurses Forum Marie Curie Cancer Care Sanofi-aventis Appendix C
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Nivolumab for treating advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma At the scoping consultation stage, the scopes for
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of hepatitis B
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of hepatitis B Comment 1: The draft remit Comments received on the draft scope Appropriateness As liver
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Summary form Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Pixantrone monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory Response to consultee and commentator
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Health Technology Appraisal
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Health Technology Appraisal Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective orthopaedic surgery of the lower limbs Comment
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA)
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Durvalumab for maintenance treatment of locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer that has not progressed after platinum-based chemoradiation therapy Response
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Single Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Proposed Single Technology Appraisal Apremilast for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis ID679 Consultee and commentator comment form Please use
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Dabrafenib for treating unresectable, advanced or metastatic
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Dabrafenib for treating unresectable, advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma mutation-positive melanoma
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Nivolumab for adjuvant treatment of resected stage III and IV melanoma
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Nivolumab for adjuvant treatment of resected stage III and IV Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Comment:
More informationTrabectedin for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Summary form Comment 1: the draft remit Trabectedin for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer Appropriateness (Royal Marsden Hospital/Institute
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Cemiplimab for treating cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Cemiplimab for treating cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please note:
More informationNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Empagliflozin combination therapy for treating type 2 diabetes
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Comment 1: the draft remit Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Empagliflozin combination therapy for treating type 2 diabetes Response to consultee and commentator
More informationAppendix D - NICE s response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft scope and provisional matrix
Comment 1: the draft remit Appendix D - NICE s response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft scope and provisional matrix Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Tolvaptan for treating autosomal
More informationNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Gemtuzumab ozogamacin for untreated de novo acute myeloid leukaemia Response to consultee and commentator comments re-scope Please note: Comments received in the course
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Tadalafil for the treatment of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Comment 1: the draft remit Appendix D - NICE s response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft scope and provisional matrix National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Single Technology
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Appendix C Comment 1: the draft scope Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Carmustine implants for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Centre for Clinical Practice SCOPE Clinical guideline title: Hepatitis B (chronic): diagnosis and management of chronic hepatitis B in children, young
More informationDronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter Comment 1: the draft remit Appropriateness Sanofi-aventis Sanofi-aventis believe
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Arsenic trioxide for treating acute promyelocytic leukaemia
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Arsenic trioxide for treating acute promyelocytic leukaemia Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please note:
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Vismodegib for treating basal cell carcinoma [ID1043]
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Vismodegib for treating basal cell carcinoma [ID1043] Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please note: Comments
More informationAppendix E - Summary form Oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer table of consultee comments
Oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer table of consultee comments Section Consultees Comments Action Objective Roche RCP RCP As far as capecitabine is concerned, the objective
More informationAppendix C - Summary form
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Appendix C - Summary form Single Techn Appraisal (STA) Agomelatine for the treatment of major depressive episodes Response to consultee and commentator
More informationSorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
DOI: 10.3310/hta14suppl1/03 Health Technology Assessment 2010; Vol. 14: Suppl. 1 Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma M Connock, 1 J Round, 2 S Bayliss, 1 S Tubeuf, 2 W Greenheld
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Tildrakizumab for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Tildrakizumab for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Midostaurin for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Midostaurin for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please note: Comments
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal Review of TA 118 Colorectal cancer (metastatic) - bevacizumab &
More informationNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Tisagenlecleucel-T for previously treated B-cell acute lymphoblastic Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta474
Sorafenib for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta474 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal Review of TA215; Pazopanib for the first line treatment of advanced
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Health Technology Appraisal Trastuzumab, as monotherapy and in combination with a taxane, for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (to include
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Centre for Clinical Practice SCOPE Clinical guideline title: Hepatitis B (chronic): diagnosis and management of chronic hepatitis B in children, young
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Proposed Health Technology Appraisal Nalmefene for reducing alcohol consumption in people with alcohol dependence Draft scope (pre-referral) Draft remit/appraisal
More informationEntecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection
DOI: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/05 Health Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: Suppl. 3 Entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection J Shepherd,* E Gospodarevskaya, G Frampton and K Cooper Southampton
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 21 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta507
Sofosbuvir velpatasvir voxilaprevir for treating chronic hepatitis C Technology appraisal guidance Published: 21 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta507 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Comment 1: the draft remit Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in people with atrial Response
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE 1 Guideline title SCOPE Colorectal cancer: diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer 1.1 Short title Colorectal cancer 2 The remit The Department
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Health Technology Appraisal. Prucalopride for the treatment of chronic constipation in women
Health Technology Appraisal Summary form Prucalopride for the treatment of chronic constipation in women Comment 1: the draft remit Appropriateness Movetis Movetis entirely welcomes the opportunity to
More informationNICE Single Technology Appraisal of cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and /or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
NICE Single Technology Appraisal of cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and /or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Introduction Merck Serono appreciates the opportunity to comment
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Anamorelin for treating cachexia and anorexia in people with non-small-cell lung cancer
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Anamorelin for treating cachexia and anorexia in people with non-small-cell Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral)
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Erenumab for preventing migraine ID1188
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Erenumab for preventing migraine ID1188 Comment 1: the draft remit Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Appropriateness
More informationRe: Final Appraisal Determination Vinflunine for the treatment of advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.
24 March 2011 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chair, Appeal Committee National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence MidCity Place 71 High Holborn London WC1V 6NA Dear xxxxxxxx Re: Final Appraisal Determination
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Proposed Health Technology Appraisal Radium-223 chloride for the treatment of bone metastases in castrate resistant prostate cancer Draft scope Draft
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 22 September 2010 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta200
Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C Technology appraisal guidance Published: 22 September 2010 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta200 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA/MTA) Avelumab for treating metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma
Single Technology Appraisal (STA/MTA) Avelumab for treating metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please note:
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 18 July 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta531
Pembrolizumab for untreated PD- L1-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 18 July 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta531 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject
More informationPatient/carer organisation statement template
Thank you for agreeing to give us your views on the technology and the way it should be used in the NHS. Patients and patient advocates can provide a unique perspective on the technology, which is not
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta499
Glecaprevir pibrentasvir for treating chronic hepatitis C Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta499 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta476
Paclitaxel as albumin-bound nanoparticles with gemcitabine for untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta476 NICE 2018. All
More informationDonepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (review of TA 111)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Health Technology Appraisal Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (review of TA 111) Response
More informationRituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV (review of guidance 110) Issued: January 2012 guidance.nice.org.uk/ta243 NICE has accredited the process used by the Centre for Health Technology
More informationSingle Technology Appraisal (STA) Obeticholic acid for treating primary biliary cirrhosis ID785
Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Obeticholic acid for treating primary biliary cirrhosis ID785 Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Comment
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Single Technology Appraisal. Ibrutinib for treating chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Single Technology Appraisal Ibrutinib for treating chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Final scope Remit/appraisal objective To appraise the clinical and cost
More informationResource impact report: Sofosbuvir velpatasvir for treating chronic hepatitis C TA430
Putting NICE guidance into practice Resource impact report: Sofosbuvir velpatasvir for treating chronic hepatitis C TA430 Published: January 2017 Summary Sofosbuvir velpatasvir is recommended as an option
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Comment 1: the draft remit Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Botulinum toxin type A for the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 28 October 2009 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta183
Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent and stage IVB cervical cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 October 2009 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta183 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice
More informationCritical Appraisal Skills. Professor Dyfrig Hughes Health Economist AWMSG
Critical Appraisal Skills Professor Dyfrig Hughes Health Economist AWMSG Critical appraisal of economic evaluations Quality of the underlying evidence Quality of the analysis Quality of reporting 1. Quality
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
Comment 2: the draft scope Appendix D NICE s response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft scope and provisional matrix National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Single Technology
More informationPeginterferon alfa and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Part review of NICE technology appraisal guidance 75 and 106
Issue date: September 2010 Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C Part review of NICE technology appraisal guidance 75 and 106 National Institute for Health and Clinical
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 6 December 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta492
Atezolizumab for untreated PD- L1-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer when cisplatin is unsuitable Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 December 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta492
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Proposed Health Technology Appraisal Secukinumab for treating ankylosing spondylitis after inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 25 November 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta364
Daclatasvir for treating chronic hepatitis C Technology appraisal guidance Published: 25 November 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta364 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Proposed Health Technology Appraisal Everolimus in combination with exemestane for the treatment of advanced or metastatic HER2 negative, oestrogen
More informationScottish Medicines Consortium
Scottish Medicines Consortium sorafenib 200mg tablets (Nexavar ) (No. 321/06) Bayer Plc 6 October 2006 The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) has completed its assessment of the above product and advises
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 21 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta512
Tivozanib for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma Technology appraisal guidance Published: March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta512 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationBevacizumab added to a taxane for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Appendix I Bevacizumab added to a taxane for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) provide a unique perspective on the technology, which is not typically available
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Health Technology Appraisal Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Appraisal Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence Comments received from Consultees and Commentators on the draft scope
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 7 October 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta357
Pembrolizumab for treating advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab Technology appraisal guidance Published: 7 October 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta357 NICE 2018. All rights reserved.
More informationPrimary brain tumours and cerebral metastases workshop
Primary brain tumours and cerebral workshop 22.4.16 Summary of workshop group discussions on the content of the scope Scope section Title: Primary brain tumours and cerebral Who the guideline is for People
More information1 st Appraisal Committee meeting Background & Clinical Effectiveness Gillian Ells & Malcolm Oswald 24/11/2016
Lead team presentation Nivolumab for treating recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck after platinum-based chemotherapy [ID971] 1 st Appraisal Committee meeting Background
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 28 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta516
Cabozantinib for treating medullary thyroid cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta516 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationTumor incidence varies significantly, depending on geographical location.
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the 5 th most common malignancy worldwide with male-to-female ratio 5:1 in Asia 2:1 in the United States Tumor incidence varies significantly, depending on geographical location.
More informationScottish Medicines Consortium
Scottish Medicines Consortium cetuximab 2mg/ml intravenous infusion (Erbitux ) (279/06) MerckKGaA No 9 June 2006 The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) has completed its assessment of the above product
More informationPonatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
Ponatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Single Technology Appraisal 2 nd Committee meeting: 16 March 2017 Committee C FOR PUBLIC Key issues Absence of direct
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Health Technology Appraisal Rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory stage III or IV follicular non-hodgkin s lymphoma (review of technology
More informationLenvatinib and sorafenib for treating differentiated thyroid cancer after radioactive iodine [ID1059]
Contains AIC Lenvatinib and sorafenib for treating differentiated thyroid cancer after radioactive iodine [ID1059] Multiple Technology Appraisal Background and Clinical Effectiveness Lead team: Femi Oyebode
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 25 January 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta243
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma Technology appraisal guidance Published: 25 January 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta243 NICE 2017. All rights reserved. Subject to
More informationHepatocellular Carcinoma: A major global health problem. David L. Wood, MD Interventional Radiology Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A major global health problem David L. Wood, MD Interventional Radiology Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center Hepatocellular Carcinoma WORLDWIDE The #2 Cancer Killer Overall cancer
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health Technology Appraisal Cabozantinib for untreated locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma Final scope Remit/appraisal objective To appraise
More informationNICE decisions on health care provisions in England
NICE decisions on health care provisions in England Matt Stevenson, Professor of Health Technology Assessment (HTA), ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK A quick introduction I am Technical Director of
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 1 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta483
Nivolumab for previously treated squamous non-small-cell lung cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 1 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta483 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice
More informationBevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin for treating the first recurrence of platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Final appraisal determination Bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin for treating the first recurrence of platinum-sensitive advanced
More informationErlotinib for the first-line treatment of EGFR-TK mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer
ERRATUM Erlotinib for the first-line treatment of EGFR-TK mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer This report was commissioned by the NIHR HTA Programme as project number 11/08 Completed 6 th January
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Proposed Health Technology Appraisal Vorapaxar for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events after myocardial infarction Draft scope (pre-referral)
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 8 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta487
Venetoclax for treating chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Technology appraisal guidance Published: 8 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta487 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationMerck Merck response to NICE ACD: Cetuximab in the treatment of LA SCCHN: 26 th February 2007
response to NICE ACD: Cetuximab in the treatment of LA SCCHN: 26 th February 2007 NICE Single Technology Appraisal of cetuximab for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head
More informationPemetrexed for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
DOI: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/05 Pemetrexed for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer J Greenhalgh,* C McLeod, A Bagust, A Boland, N Fleeman, Y Dundar, J Oyee,
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 11 October 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta480
Tofacitinib for moderate to severeere rheumatoid arthritis Technology appraisal guidance Published: 11 October 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta480 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 16 May 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta520
Atezolizumab for treating locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after chemotherapy Technology appraisal guidance Published: 16 May 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta520 NICE 2018. All rights
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 25 February 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta333
Axitinib for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of prior systemic treatment Technology appraisal guidance Published: 25 February 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta333 NICE 2018. All rights
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 22 May 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta284
Bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 22 May 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta284 NICE 2017.
More informationAccess to newly licensed medicines. Scottish Medicines Consortium
Access to newly licensed medicines Scottish Medicines Consortium Modifiers The Committee has previously been provided with information about why the SMC uses modifiers in its appraisal process and also
More informationIbrutinib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)
Ibrutinib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) Post consultation appraisal committee meeting Dr Jane Adam 2 nd November 2017 Slides for Projector and Public 1 Preliminary
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)
Thank you for agreeing to give us a statement on your organisation s view of the technology and the way it should be used in the NHS. Healthcare professionals can provide a unique perspective on the technology
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 28 September 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta411
Necitumumab for untreated advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 September 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta411 NICE 2017. All rights reserved.
More informationCosting report: Lipid modification Implementing the NICE guideline on lipid modification (CG181)
Putting NICE guidance into practice Costing report: Lipid modification Implementing the NICE guideline on lipid modification (CG181) Published: July 2014 This costing report accompanies Lipid modification:
More informationDabrafenib for treating unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma
Dabrafenib for treating unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 Issued: October 2014 guidance.nice.org.uk/ta321 NICE has accredited the process used by the Centre for Health Technology Evaluation at NICE
More informationDronedarone for the treatment of non-permanent atrial fibrillation
Dronedarone for the treatment of non-permanent atrial Issued: August 2010 last modified: December 2012 guidance.nice.org.uk/ta197 NICE has accredited the process used by the Centre for Health Technology
More informationTechnology Appraisal (STA) Tocilizumab for treating giant cell arteritis
Technology Appraisal (STA) Tocilizumab for treating giant cell arteritis Response to consultee and commentator comments on the draft remit and draft scope (pre-referral) Please note: Comments received
More informationPart 1 Public handouts
Part 1 Public handouts Chair s presentation Trastuzumab emtansine for treating HER2- positive, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after treatment with trastuzumab and a taxane Rapid
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 29 June 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta227
Erlotinib monotherapy for maintenance treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 29 June 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta227 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to
More informationentecavir, 0.5mg and 1mg film-coated tablets and 0.05 mg/ml oral solution, Baraclude SMC No. (747/11) Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd
entecavir, 0.5mg and 1mg film-coated tablets and 0.05 mg/ml oral solution, Baraclude SMC No. (747/11) Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd 09 December 2011 The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) has
More information