REDACTED. 06/25/2013 Minute Order (print) Event ID: STATUS
|
|
- Hubert Beasley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REDACTED 06/21/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION OF JANA WINTER FOR INSPECTION BY COUNSEL WITH PROPOSED ORDER FILED BY ATTORNEY FOR JANA WINTER - STD /JR 06/24/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO REPLY TO ANY SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED BY MS WINTER REGARDING HER MOTION TO QUASH THE DEFENSE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND AD TESTIFICANDUM (D-133) FILED BY DEFENSE - STD /JR 06/25/2013 Filing Other Event ID: OPPOSITION OF JANA WINTER TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO REPLY TO ANY SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED BY MS WINTER REGARDING HER MOTION TO QUASH THE DEFENSE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND AD TESTIFICANDUM (D-133) FILED BY HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP - STD /JR 06/25/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE LABELING MOTION FILED BY JANA WINTER FOR INSPECTION BY COUNSEL "C-43". COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, MICHAEL THEIS, AND CHRISTOPHER MURRAY. 06/25/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER SETTING NEW DEADLINES AND HEARING DATES (C-45)COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, SHERIFF GRAYSON ROBINSON, KRISTEN NELSON, ATTORNEY MICHAEL THEIS, AND ATTORNEY CHRISTOPHER MURRAY. 06/25/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER AMENDING ORDER REQUIRING IN-CUSTODY SANITY EXAMINATION (C-41A). COPIES VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, GRAYSON ROBINSON, SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAM MAY, ATTORNEY TANYA SMITH. 06/25/2013 Order Event ID: SUPPRESSED ORDER REGARDING WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE ENTERED BY THE COURT SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #25 COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON, /JR 06/25/2013 Minute Order (print) Event ID: STATUS JUDGE SAMOUR REPORTER J. MARTIN DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH COUNSEL MS. TAMERA BRADY, MR. DANIEL KING, AND MS. KRISTEN NELSON PRESENT FOR THE PEOPLE ARE DDA MS. KAREN PEARSON, MR. DANIEL ZOOK, MR. RICH ORMAN, MR. JACOB EDSON, MS. LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, AND DA MR. GEORGE BRAUCHLER **************************** TODAY'S STATUS HEARING WAS SET BY THE COURT TO ADDRESS CMHIP'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 TO COMPLETE THE COURT-ORDERED SANITY EXAMINATION. THE PARTIES HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE COURT GRANTING THE
2 REQUEST FROM CMHIP. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS GRANTED. TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE EXTENSION FOR THE EVALUATION, THE COURT PROPOSES TO THE PARTIES IN WRITING AN AMENDED SET OF DEADLINES AND HEARING DATES. THE PARTIES HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE DATES PROPOSED BY THE COURT, ALTHOUGH THE DEFENSE INDICATES THAT IT MAY NEED TO SEEK ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE THE NONCAPITAL MOTIONS. THE COURT WILL ISSUE THE AMENDED SCHEDULE AS AN ORDER LATER. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMENDED SCHEDULE, THERE WILL NOT BE A HEARING ON AUGUST 19, 2013, THE RETURN DATE FOR JANA WINTER'S SUBPOENA. THE PARTIES AND THE COURT DISCUSS TWO OPTIONS: (1) MS. WINTER APPEARING ON AUGUST 19 AND THE COURT CONTINUING HER SUBPOENA ON THAT DATE TO SEPTEMBER 30, THE DATE THE HEARING IS NOW SCHEDULED FOR; OR (2) MS. WINTER AGREEING ON HER OWN TO BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 30. THE PARTIES HAVE NO OBJECTION TO EITHER OF THE OPTIONS PROPOSED. ATTORNEY KOREY CHRISTIANSEN FROM THE LAW FIRM REPRESENTING MS. WINTER IS PRESENT IN THE COURTROOM AND LETS THE COURT KNOW HIS FIRM WILL FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE TWO OPTIONS AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES. SUCH RESPONSE IS DUE A WEEK FROM TODAY, JULY 2, NEXT, THE PARTIES ADDRESS MS. WINTER'S MOTION, C-43, FOR INSPECTION OF THE PACKAGE BY HER COUNSEL. BOTH THE PEOPLE AND THE DEFENSE OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST. THE COURT GRANTS THE DEFENSE'S MOTION FOR ONE WEEK, UNTIL JULY 2, TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE MOTION AND GIVES MS. WINTER'S COUNSEL TWO WEEKS FROM TODAY, UNTIL JULY 9, TO FILE A REPLY. THE PEOPLE STATE THEIR POSITION ON THE MOTION ON THE RECORD TODAY. THE COURT NEXT ADDRESSES THE RECENT MOTION BY THE DEFENSE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON WINTER'S MOTION TO QUASH WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER HER SUPPLEMENTAL FILING. EARLIER TODAY, WINTER FILED AN OBJECTION TO THAT MOTION. THE COURT RULES THAT, SINCE THE MOTION TO QUASH WAS ADVANCED BY WINTER, SHE SHOULD FILE HER SUPPLEMENTAL FILING FIRST. THEN THE DEFENSE WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN RESPONSE. WINTER WILL THEREAFTER HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO FILE A REPLY TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL FILING. THE COURT WILL ISSUE A BRIEFING SCHEDULE LATER. THE COURT INFORMS THE PARTIES THAT IT HAS BEEN APPROACHED BY SCAO WITH AN OFFER OF ASSISTANCE BY MAKING ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRES AVAILABLE TO PROSPECTIVE JURORS. THE COURT DECLINED THE OFFER FOR THE REASONS STATED ON THE RECORD, BUT WANTED TO GIVE THE PARTIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE INPUT. THE PARTIES GENERALLY AGREE WITH THE COURT. HOWEVER, THE DEFENSE WOULD LIKE A LITTLE TIME TO THINK ABOUT IT FURTHER. THE COURT GIVES THE DEFENSE ONE WEEK TO FILE A NOTICE SEEKING ELECTRONIC JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES. IF THE COURT DOES NOT HEAR FROM THE DEFENSE, ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRES WILL NOT BE USED IN THIS CASE. THE DEFENSE ADVISES THE COURT THAT THE EVALUATOR AT CMHIP HAS EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT SOME OF THE DEFENDANT'S PRIOR PHYSICIANS MAY BE RELUCTANT TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION TO CMHIP DURING THE SANITY EXAMINATION BECAUSE OF PRIVILEGE CONCERNS. ACCORDINGLY, CHMIP HAS ASKED THE PARTIES TO OBTAIN AN ORDER FROM THE COURT STATING THAT ANY PHYSICIAN-PATIENT/PSYCHOLOGIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGE HAS BEEN WAIVED PURSUANT TO SECTION (2)(A), C.R.S. (2012). THE DEFENSE HAS PREPARED A PROPOSED ORDER, WHICH IT TENDERS TO THE COURT. THE PEOPLE DO NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED ORDER, BUT ASKS THAT THE ORDER BE SUPPRESSED SO THAT IT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. THE DEFENSE LIKEWISE ASKS THAT THE ORDER BE SUPPRESSED. THE PROPOSED ORDER IS GRANTED AND WILL BE SUPPRESSED (ALTHOUGH IT MAY BE FORWARDED TO THE EXAMINERS AT CMHIP). THE DEFENSE WILL SEND A COPY OF THE ORDER TO THE EXAMINERS AT CMHIP. THE PEOPLE
3 MAY SEND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF IT TO CMHIP AS WELL. * THE DATE OF THE NEXT HEARING IN THIS CASE IS SEPTEMBER 30, ALL PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED DATES BETWEEN NOW AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, ARE VACATED. IF WINTER DECLINES TO AGREE TO RETURN TO COURT ON SEPTEMBER 30, THE COURT WILL RESET THE AUGUST 19 HEARING DATE TO CONTINUE HER SUBPOENA ON THE RECORD. 06/25/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO REPLY TO ANY SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED BY MS. WINTER REGARDING HER MOTION TO QUASH (D-133). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, MICHAEL THEIS, AND CHRISTOPHER MURRAY. 06/25/2013 Request Filed Event ID: REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED FROM THERESA HOUSE, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, , THERESA.HOUSE@HOGANLOVELLS.COM, FOR HEARING DATE. REQUEST RECEIVED BY J. MARTIN. /JEM 06/25/2013 Request Filed Event ID: REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED FROM THERESA HOUSE, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, , THERESA.HOUSE@HOGANLOVELLS.COM, FOR HEARING DATE. REQUEST RECEIVED BY J. MARTIN. /JEM 06/25/2013 Status Conference 08/02/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/05/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/06/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/07/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/08/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/09/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/12/ :00 AM 26
4 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/13/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/14/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/15/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/16/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/19/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/20/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/21/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/22/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/23/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/26/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/27/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/28/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/29/ :00 AM 26 06/25/2013 Motions Hearing 08/30/ :00 AM 26
5 06/25/2013 Status Conference 06/25/ :30 AM 26 Status.: HELD-Hearing Held Note..: IN DIVISION /25/2013 Status Conference 09/30/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Status Conference 11/15/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 11/25/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 11/26/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 11/27/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Hearing 08/19/ :00 AM 26 Note..: SUBPOENA RETURN 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/07/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/08/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/09/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/10/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/11/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/15/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/16/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/17/ :00 AM 26
6 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/18/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/21/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/22/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/23/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/24/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/25/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/28/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/29/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/30/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 10/31/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 11/01/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 12/18/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 12/19/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Motions Hearing 12/20/ :00 AM 26 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT JURORS FROM POSSESSING PHONES, LAPTOPS, OR OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING TRIAL (D-65). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON.
7 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT GRANTS WITH CAVEAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ALLOW MR. HOLMES' COUNSEL TO ADDRESS THE PROSPECTIVE JURORS DURING ORIENTATON (D-67). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON. 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COURT ORDERS CONCERNING PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED BY ALL COURT PERSONNEL INVOLVING ALL INTERACTION WITH PROSPECTIVE AND SEATED JURORS (D-87). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON. 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A FAIR TRIAL UNENCUMBERED BY AN UNNCESSARY DISPLAY OF COURTROOM SECURITY (D-76). THE COURT DISAGREES WITH ONE OF THE OBJECTIONS RAISED IN THE MOTION. COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON. 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SEQUESTER THE JURY (D-68). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON. 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUROR POSTPONEMENTS AND EXCUSALS TO BE MADE ON THE RECORD (D-80). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON. 06/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PRESERVATION OF JURY SELECTION MATERIALS (D-84). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON. 08/05/2013 JTRL DISPO-CONTINUED Event ID: End of Case: 2012 CR
Regulation of the Chancellor
Regulation of the Chancellor Category: STUDENTS Issued: 6/22/09 Number: A-450 Subject: INVOLUNTARY TRANSFER PROCEDURES Page: 1 of 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES This regulation supersedes Chancellor s Regulation
More informationTERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT HEARINGS BEFORE HEARING EXAMINER
Applicability This hearing process applies only if an employee requests a hearing after receiving notice of a proposed decision to: 1. Terminate a continuing contract at any time, except as provided below;
More informationPurpose: Policy: The Fair Hearing Plan is not applicable to mid-level providers. Grounds for a Hearing
Subject: Fair Hearing Plan Policy #: CR-16 Department: Credentialing Approvals: Credentialing Committee QM Committee Original Effective Date: 5/00 Revised Effective Date: 1/03, 2/04, 1/05, 11/06, 12/06,
More informationAttachment 5 2. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT
Attachment 5 CITY MANAGER S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CONDUCTED UNDER CHAPTER ONE OF THE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE July 19, 2010 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to establish
More informationSpecial Education Fact Sheet. Special Education Impartial Hearings in New York City
New York Lawyers For The Public Interest, Inc. 151 West 30 th Street, 11 th Floor New York, NY 10001-4017 Tel 212-244-4664 Fax 212-244-4570 TTD 212-244-3692 www.nylpi.org Special Education Fact Sheet Special
More informationAppeal and Grievance Procedure
Appeal and Grievance Procedure DEFINITIONS. Complainant is defined as any resident or prospective resident in the project whose rights duties, welfare, or status are or may be adversely affected by management
More informationDue Process Hearing Request Information Sheet and Model Form
Oregon Department of Education Office of Learning/Student Services 255 Capitol Street NE Dispute Resolution Section Salem, OR 97310-0203 (503) 947-5689 Due Process Hearing Request Information Sheet and
More informationDallas ISD TERM CONTRACTS
The notices on the following pages are provided to meet requirements established by law or policy: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONTRACT should be used for an employee whose contract has been
More informationCase 3:10-cr ARC Document 137 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:10-cr-00338-ARC Document 137 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL ACTION v. No. 3:10-cr-338 (Judge A.
More informationMEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND MEDICAID WAIVERS: APPEALS, COMPLAINTS, AND GRIEVANCES
(800) 692-7443 (Voice) (877) 375-7139 (TDD) www.disabilityrightspa.org MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND MEDICAID WAIVERS: APPEALS, COMPLAINTS, AND GRIEVANCES This outline gives you information on Medical Assistance
More informationHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY Adopted May 6, 2010 Revised June 2, 2016 The Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Airport Board
More informationHow to Conduct an Unemployment Benefits Hearing
How to Conduct an Unemployment Benefits Hearing Qualifications for receiving Unemployment Benefits Good Morning my name is Dorothy Hervey and I am a paralegal with Colorado Legal Services and I will talk
More informationMedicaid Denied My Request for Services, Now What?
Medicaid Denied My Request for Services, Now What? A Handbook on How to Appeal Medicaid Services Denial Kentucky Protection & Advocacy This handbook gives legal information about how to file a Kentucky
More informationPRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Upper Marlboro, Maryland Policy No. BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY
PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Upper Marlboro, Maryland BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY 4200 Policy No. PERSONNEL Employee and 4-205 Appeals Before the Board of Education I. Purpose
More informationU.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv KAJ
Page 1 of 5 CLOSED, LEAD U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv-00384-KAJ Equal Employment v. Comcast Corporation, et al Assigned to: Honorable Kent A. Jordan
More informationIf you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )
LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE CO. for TRANSCRANIAL
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER HOW TO CHANGE A HEARING DATE FOR THE HEARING ON DV RESTRAINING ORDERS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER www.occourts.org HOW TO CHANGE A HEARING DATE FOR THE HEARING ON DV RESTRAINING ORDERS All documents must be typed or printed neatly. Please
More informationDisability Rights Florida or (TDD)
Advocacy 101 Presenting Your Medicaid Case before the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, the Florida Office of Appeal Hearings, or the Florida Office of Fair Hearings August 2017 Disclaimer This
More informationGRIEVENCE PROCEDURES INFORMAL REVIEWS AND HEARINGS
GRIEVENCE PROCEDURES INFORMAL REVIEWS AND HEARINGS OVERVIEW Both applicants and participants have the right to disagree with and appeal, certain decisions of the PHA that may adversely affect them. PHA
More informationSection 504 Grievance Procedures
Section 504 Grievance Procedures Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools has an internal resolution procedure to provide a prompt and impartial review of complaints alleging any action prohibited by Section 504
More informationNOTICE OF RIGHTS OF STUDENTS AND PARENTS UNDER SECTION 504
NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF STUDENTS AND PARENTS UNDER SECTION 504 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, commonly referred to as "Section 504," is a nondiscrimination statute enacted by the United States
More informationLong-Term Suspensions and Procedural Due Process
Long-Term Suspensions and Procedural Due Process P3100-5.1 Long Student Procedures Page 1 of 5 "Long-term suspension" shall mean denial of a class attendance for a definite time in excess of ten (10) consecutive
More informationProposed Revisions to the Procedure for Adjusting Grievances
Proposed Revisions to the Procedure for Adjusting Grievances 8 VAC 20-90-10 et seq. Presented to the Board of Education February 27, TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Definitions 3 Part II Grievance Procedure Purpose
More informationAppendix 11 GUIDELINES FOR TRIALS INVOLVING DEAF JURORS WHO SERVE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS
Appendix 11 GUIDELINES FOR TRIALS INVOLVING DEAF JURORS WHO SERVE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS (Revised 2016) New Jersey Judiciary Language Access Plan Page 55 of 75 1. Introduction
More informationSECTION 504 NOTICE OF PARENT/STUDENT RIGHTS IN IDENTIFICATION/EVALUATION, AND PLACEMENT
SECTION 504 NOTICE OF PARENT/STUDENT RIGHTS IN IDENTIFICATION/EVALUATION, AND PLACEMENT In compliance with the procedural requirements of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the following Notice
More informationWhat are your rights if DTA won't give you benefits, or reduces or stops your benefits?
Part 7 Appeal Rights 83 What are your rights if DTA won't give you benefits, or reduces or stops your benefits? If DTA denies benefits, or stops or lowers your benefits, you can ask for a "fair hearing."
More informationUnderstanding the Administrative Hearing Process & 2017 Managed Care Regulations Changes
Understanding the Administrative Hearing Process & 2017 Managed Care Regulations Changes Home and Community Based Waiver Conference November 14, 2017 1 OUTLINE I. Purpose of Training II. Purpose of a Hearing
More informationRules of Procedure for Screening and Hearing Meetings
Page: 1 of 15 SYNOPSIS: The purpose of this document is to provide rules of procedure for Screening and Hearing meetings conducted pursuant to the City s Parking Administrative Monetary Penalties By-law
More informationNOTICE OF APPEAL OR PETITION
NOTICE OF APPEAL OR PETITION State Personnel Board 801 Capitol Mall Sacramento, CA 95814 Dismissal Demotion Suspension ( days) Medical Demotion / Termination Automatic Resignation (AWOL) Set Aside Resignation
More informationM A N I T O B A ) Order No. 121/12 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) September 12, 2012
M A N I T O B A ) ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) September 12, 2012 BEFORE: Susan Proven, P.H.Ec., Acting Chair Robert Warren, MBA, Member Regis Gosselin, BA, MBA, CGA, Chair TOWN OF LAC DU BONNET
More informationNon-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process
Non-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process Regions should seek to resolve all disputes involving people in an amicable fashion. Compromise is preferable to more severe forms of resolution. Almost
More informationCHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURES
CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURES The regulations and guidelines of the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP or Program) under the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
More informationGrievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018
Grievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Grievance Procedure ( Procedure ) is to implement a system by which the Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County
More informationA qualified interpreter is one who, via an onsite appearance or a video remote interpreting service (VRI), can:
CHAPTER: Page 1 of 6 12.0 Introduction Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination in the services, programs, and activities of all state and local governments on the
More informationParent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement
Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement The following is a description of the rights granted to students with a disability by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a
More informationPUBLIC HOUSING: THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
PUBLIC HOUSING: THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE IMPORTANT This brochure applies to tenants in public housing developments operated by the Hawaii Public Housing Authority ( HPHA ). This material is based upon work
More informationExhibit 2 RFQ Engagement Letter
Exhibit 2 RFQ 17-25 Engagement Letter The attached includes the 6 page proposed engagement letter to be used by HCC. ENGAGEMENT LETTER Dear: [Lead Counsel/Partner] We are pleased to inform you that your
More informationCOMMUNITY HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES
COMMUNITY HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES THIS NOTICE DESCRIBES HOW MEDICAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU MAY BE USED AND DISCLOSED AND HOW YOU CAN GET ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION. PLEASE
More informationAct 443 of 2009 House Bill 1379
Act 443 of 2009 House Bill 1379 AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSURE OF ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE COUNSELORS; TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CLINICAL ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE COUNSELOR SUPERVISORS;
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-16-2007 USA v. Eggleston Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-1416 Follow this and additional
More information19 TH JUDICIAL DUI COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION
19 TH JUDICIAL DUI COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION Please review the attached DUI Court contract and Release of Information. ******* You must sign and hand back to the court the Release of Information today.
More information2010 Sharing Hope Program for men
2010 Sharing Hope Program for men Criteria and Application Made possible by participating sperm banks and fertility centers Program Overview Goal Cancer patients have little opportunity to save for the
More informationGeneric Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;
4160-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 15 [Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0402] Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D56435 L/hu
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D56435 L/hu AD3d ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J. WILLIAM F. MASTRO REINALDO E. RIVERA MARK C. DILLON FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY,
More informationHow to Conduct a Public Hearing
How to Conduct a Public Hearing FRCOG Workshop Selectboard Essentials January 10, 2013 Presented by Joel B. Bard All materials Copyright 2012 Kopelman and Paige, P.C. All rights reserved. Introduction
More informationHOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE I. DEFINITIONS (A) Complainant: Any Tenant (as defined below) whose grievance is presented to the 504 Coordinator
More informationQuestion/Comment Asker Answer Answerer Peck, Keith Valid concern.
Attendees Balanay, Denise Cidade, Chad Cookson, Patricia Goldman, Annelise Grossman, Naomi Hamman, Kirstin Jose, Mike King, Tina Lee, Michael Peck, Keith Pennington, Kiele Rocco, Susan Sugita, Erin Tydeman,
More informationDISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE RULE
JCEB-R Student Hearing Procedure 8/16/18 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE RULE RATIONALE/OBJECTIVE: A student may be subject to Long-Term Suspension or Expulsion, as defined below, for the violation of school rules
More informationPolicies, Procedures and Guidelines
Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Faculty Grievance Review Panel Guidelines for Hearing Committees Approved by: Faculty Grievance Review Panel Date of Original Approval(s): Policy
More informationGrievance Procedure of the Memphis Housing Authority
Grievance Procedure of the Memphis Housing Authority 1. Definitions applicable to the grievance procedure: [966.53] A. Grievance: Any dispute which a Tenant may have with respect to MHA action or failure
More informationIssue Alert
Issue Alert 13-04-01 Program Area: Issue Summary: Persons Affected: Food Assistance Program (FAP), Family Independence Program (FIP), State Disability Assistance (SDA), Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA), Medicaid
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT DIVERSION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2019
Page 1 of 17 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT DIVERSION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEPARTMENT MISSION Programs within Court Diversion share a common goal of diverting offenders out of the
More informationChapter 1 Overview of Manual
Chapter 1 Overview of Manual 1.1 Purpose of Manual 1-1 1.2 Terminology Used in this Chapter 1-2 1.3 Involuntary Commitment 1-3 A. Three Types of Involuntary Commitment B. Inpatient vs. Outpatient Commitment
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 15, 2017 523227 In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER PP., Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STATE OF NEW
More informationSection 8 Administrative Plan (revised January 2000) Chapter 22 # page 1
Appeals/Grievance Procedures General Policy Both applicants and tenants of the Section 8 Program have the right to appeal certain decisions rendered by the HA which directly affect their admission to,
More informationAppendix C Resolution of a Complaint against an Employee
Appendix C Resolution of a Complaint against an Employee Appendix C: Resolution of a Complaint Against an Employee As outlined in the Union College Sexual Misconduct Policy, an individual who wishes to
More informationThe Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Movie Captioning and Video Description
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Movie Captioning and Video Description James V. DeBergh Legislative Attorney March 29, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
More informationArgued telephonically October 3, 2017 Decided November 14, 2017
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. SPARROWEEN, LLC d/b/a CIGAR EMPORIUM and RICHARD YANUZZI, v. Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationPHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant.
PHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case
More informationparticipating in a court proceeding, cannot be guaranteed due process of law or
IN THE TIDRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2017 -c:c:,\ Replaces 2015-003 COURT INTERPRETER PROGRAM Whereas, pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, no
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. ************************************* James Harrell, et al., * Lead Case No.: 24X Plaintiffs, *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY IN RE: BALTIMORE CITY * November 29, 2016 ASBESTOS LITIGATION Lung Cancer Trial Cluster * Consolidated Case No.: * 24X16000053 James Harrell, et al., * Lead Case
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Gomcsak v. U.S. Steel Corp., 2008-Ohio-2247.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) NORMAN GOMCSAK, et al. Appellants C.A. No. 07CA009207 v. U.S.
More informationAPPLICATION FOR CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES NON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE APPLICANT/RECIPIENT
Warren County CSEA PO Box 440 500 Justice Drive Lebanon, OH 45036 (513) 695 1580 (800) 644 2732 Name of Applicant: Address: City, State, & Zip: Date: Application Number: APPLICATION FOR CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES
More informationif accepted, FINRA will not
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHOR?TY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2017052711301 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Dwarka Persaud ("David
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/06/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/06/2015 04:00 PM INDEX NO. 190465/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In Re: New York City Asbestos
More informationHammond, Abigail M. Good afternoon, Please see the attached letter. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Hammond, Abigail M From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ben Massey Friday, January 16, 015 9:1 PM Hammond, Abigail M; jms@satiskysilverstein.com; Kathy Arney Vojtko, Dana; Brincefield,
More informationeffect that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act ( FSPTCA ), which was
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SMOKING EVERYWHERE, INC., Plaintiff, and Civ. No. 09-cv-0771 (RJL SOTTERA, INC., d/b/a NJOY, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,
More information48th Judicial District LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN
48th Judicial District LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN Section I. Legal Basis and Purpose This Language Access Plan (LAP) is the plan for the judicial district to ensure meaningful access to court services for persons
More informationiappeals Screens for the final PSA (May 24) 5
iappeals Screens for the final PSA (May 24) 5 Welcome! This is the starting point to request a review of our medical decision about your eligibility for disability benefits. There are two parts to this
More informationVolume of Colorado Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (12 CCR )
Disclaimer: On-line versions of these regulations are the most current versions available; however, these are not official publication. For official publication of these and all State of Colorado regulations,
More informationTRIAL IS DIFFERENT Trial Practice Do s and Don ts. Joseph J. Popolizio Holly A. McGee April 20, 2018 Arizona Paralegal Association
TRIAL IS DIFFERENT Trial Practice Do s and Don ts Joseph J. Popolizio Holly A. McGee April 20, 2018 Arizona Paralegal Association Meet Our Presenters Joseph J. Popolizio Partner Educational Institutions
More informationPreparing for an Oral Hearing: Taxi, Limousine or other PDV Applications
Reference Sheet 12 Preparing for an Oral Hearing: Taxi, Limousine or other PDV Applications This Reference Sheet will help you prepare for an oral hearing before the Passenger Transportation Board. You
More informationMETROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE
METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE Overview The Metrolinx Act, 2006, gives Metrolinx ( Metrolinx ) the authority to establish a system of administrative fees to ensure
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Date of docketing: December 1, 2017 NOTICE OF DOCKETING 18-1247 - Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. ITC Appeal from: U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation
More informationState of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education
State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education Introduction Steps to Protect a Child s Right to Special Education: Procedural
More informationEffective Communication in the Courts
Effective Communication in the Courts Michael Richardson, MPA June 25, 2013 1 Technical Assistance Training Material Dissemination Research Public Awareness 2 Objectives Have a basic understanding of effective
More informationAPPENDIX B TAP 31 RESOLUTION PROCESS
I. General Principles APPENDIX B TAP 31 RESOLUTION PROCESS a. Administration: The TAP 31 Resolution Process is administered by the University s Title IX Coordinator and the University s Deputy Title IX
More informationDear Prospective UMD Teen PEERS Parents:
Dear Prospective UMD Teen PEERS Parents: Thank you for your request to be a part of our University of Maryland Teen PEERS program at the Department of Hearing and Speech Clinic. Before we can schedule
More informationRE: XXXXX Reference: #17-158
Karen B. Salmon, Ph.D. State Superintendent of Schools 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD 21201 410-767-0100 410-333-6442 TTY/TDD msde.maryland.gov Executive Director Department of Special Education
More information416 DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING I. PURPOSE
416 DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING I. PURPOSE A. The school board recognizes the significant problems created by drug and alcohol use in society in general, and the public schools in particular. The school board
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RANDALL WAYNE REIFFENSTEIN
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND RANDALL WAYNE REIFFENSTEIN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part
More information29 th Judicial District Language Access Plan
29 th Judicial District Language Access Plan Section I. Legal Basis and Purpose This Language Access Plan (LAP) is the plan for the 29 th Judicial District to ensure meaningful access to court services
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Docket Number: NHTSA ]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/04/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-21623, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National
More informationIllinois Supreme Court. Language Access Policy
Illinois Supreme Court Language Access Policy Effective October 1, 2014 ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT LANGUAGE ACCESS POLICY I. PREAMBLE The Illinois Supreme Court recognizes that equal access to the courts is
More informationBEFORE WHIPPLE McDONALD AND McCLENDON JJ
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2010 CA 1524 MICHAEL NEWSON VERSUS JAMES LEBLANC SECRETARY LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CORRECTIONS AND BRENDA
More informationPasco Sheriff s Office Plan for. Auxiliary Aids and Services
Pasco Sheriff s Office Plan for Auxiliary Aids and Services All Pasco Sheriff s Office (PSO) personnel shall comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794, as implemented by
More informationAction Request Transmittal
Seniors and People with Disabilities Action Request Transmittal Mary Lee Fay Number: APD-AR-12-024 Authorized Signature Issue Date: 6/18/2012 Topic: Developmental Disabilities Due Date: Subject: Adult
More informationPROTECTING THE SPORT: GUIDE TO FEDERATION RULE ENFORCEMENT AND HEARING PROCESS
PROTECTING THE SPORT: GUIDE TO FEDERATION RULE ENFORCEMENT AND HEARING PROCESS COVER PHOTO:SHAWN MCMILLEN INTRODUCTION This pamphlet has been drafted to provide general information and to help you understand
More informationExcise and Licenses Hearing Changes and Updates. Public Informational Meeting September 17, 2018
Excise and Licenses Hearing Changes and Updates Public Informational Meeting September 17, 2018 1 Proposed Updates: 1. Update Posting Requirements 2 Proposed Updates: 1. Update Posting Requirements To
More informationCHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR THE RENTAL ASSISTANCE DEMONSTRATION (RAD) PROGRAM
CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR THE RENTAL ASSISTANCE DEMONSTRATION (RAD) PROGRAM I. Purpose A. This Grievance Procedure (Procedure) is issued in accordance with the U. S. Department
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its undersigned
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY PETITIONER, v. CASE NO: 2016-30431 DEBBIE AMY YASKIN, D.D.S., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through
More informationDATE: March 28, 2001 M E M O R A N D U M. Directors of Special Education. Gordon M. Riffel Deputy Superintendent Special Education Unit
DATE: March 28, 2001 M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Directors of Special Education Gordon M. Riffel Deputy Superintendent Special Education Unit Study of the Illinois Due Process Procedures Attached
More informationCSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees
CSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees The CSA and University of Guelph undergraduate students have been members of the Canadian
More informationTransmittal Number: Date: August 23, 2006 Distribution: Page: 1 of 1
Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) Procedures Transmittal Transmittal Number: 06-11 Date: August 23, 2006 Distribution: Page: 1 of 1 ALB OAH Staff X UPS ALJs X Upstate LDSS SUP ALJs X EBT Program
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Sep 1 2015 20:02:43 2014-KA-01805-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DAVID ALAN RINGER APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01805-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY
More informationTed Yeshion, Ph.D. Science Subcommittee Chair Professor of Forensic Science Edinboro University of Pennsylvania
Ted Yeshion, Ph.D. Science Subcommittee Chair Professor of Forensic Science Edinboro University of Pennsylvania Responsible for approximately 50% of wrongful convictions that were eventually overturned
More informationWELD COUNTY ADULT TREATMENT COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION
WELD COUNTY ADULT TREATMENT COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION Please review the attached Adult Treatment Court contract and Authorization to Share Information. Once your case has been set on the adult treatment
More informationFitness to Practise Committee Rules and Practice Direction Revised September 2012
Fitness to Practise Committee Rules and Practice Direction Revised September 2012 Table of Contents RULE 1 DEFINITIONS 1 RULE 2 ELECTRONIC HEARINGS 2 RULE 3 DUTY OF EXPERT 4 PRACTICE DIRECTION 5 No. 1
More information2019 New Superior Court Judges SOG 1/2/2019
Ensuring Language Access Services in N.C. Superior Courts January 18, 2019 1 Equal Access to Justice Using a properly trained court interpreter ensures full and fair participation and facilitates equal
More informationPOLICY NO Adopted: Final approval 10/25/06 Revised 10/13/06 Revised: 10/30/06 Revised: 5/27/08 DRUG TESTING PROGRAM
POLICY NO. 5600 Adopted: Final approval 10/25/06 Revised 10/13/06 Revised: 10/30/06 Revised: 5/27/08 DRUG TESTING PROGRAM 1 DRUG TESTING PROGRAM POLICY NO. 5600 Adopted: 9/06 Revised 10/13/06 Revised:
More information