arxiv: v1 [eess.as] 5 Oct 2017
|
|
- Dortha Hunt
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Head shadow enhancement with fixed beamformers improves sound localization based on interaural level differences arxiv: v1 [eess.as] 5 Oct 217 Benjamin Dieudonné, Tom Francart KU Leuven University of Leuven, Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Herestraat 49 bus 721, B-3 Leuven, Belgium. benjamin.dieudonne@med.kuleuven.be, tom.francart@med.kuleuven.be August 11, 217 Abstract A new method to enhance head shadow in low frequencies is presented, resulting in interaural level differences that can be used to unambiguously localize sounds. Enhancement is achieved with a fixed beamformer with ipsilateral directionality in each ear. The microphone array consists of one microphone per device. The method naturally handles multiple sources without sound location estimations. In a localization experiment with simulated bimodal listeners, performance improved from 51 to 28 root-mean-square error compared with standard omni-directional microphones. The method is also promising for bilateral cochlear implant or hearing aid users and for improved speech perception in multi-talker environments. Keywords: head shadow enhancement, enhancement of interaural level differences, sound localization 1 Introduction The human ear acts as an acoustic beamformer, as it naturally focuses on sounds that arrive from its ipsilateral side due to the head shadow. This beamforming behavior is very useful. On the one hand, it introduces interaural level differences (ILDs) which can be used to localize sounds in the horizontal plane (Rayleigh, 197). On the other hand, it might attenuate noise sources such that it improves speech understanding (Bronkhorst and Plomp, 1988). Unfortunately, the ear is not an ideal beamformer. Firstly, the beamforming only applies for higher frequencies: for low frequency sounds, the head is invisible. This is especially problematic for people with high-frequency hearing loss. Secondly, the induced ILDs cannot be used to localize sounds unambiguously for all directions: for large angles, the natural ILD-versus-angle function becomes non-monotonic (Shaw, 1974). This is especially problematic for people with poor perception of interaural time differences (ITDs), who mostly rely on ILDs for localization. Several authors have tried to enhance this behavior and have shown advantages in sound localization and speech intelligibility for different populations. In 29, Francart et al. filed a patent to optimize localization cues in a bilateral hearing aid system, giving the example of transposing ILDs to a lower frequency (Francart et al., 213). By adapting 1 of 9
2 the level in the hearing aid to obtain the same broadband ILD as a normal-hearing listener, Francart et al. (29) have shown improved sound localization in an acoustic simulation of bimodal cochlear implant (CI) listeners (CI users with a contralateral hearing aid). Lopez-Poveda et al. (216) implemented a similar strategy for bilateral cochlear implant users, inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex. Their strategy attenuated sounds in frequency regions with larger amplitude on the contralateral side, resulting in an increase in speech intelligibility for spatially separated speech and noise. Since both strategies are solely based on level cues that are present in the acoustic signal, they cannot solve the problem of the non-monotonic ILD-versus-angle function. Moreover, they can only handle multiple sound sources if they are temporally or spectro-temporally separated. Francart et al. (211) adapted their strategy by applying an artificial ILD based the angle of incidence, to obtain a monotonic ILD-versus-angle function. They found improved sound localization for real bimodal listeners. However, this strategy relied on a priori information about the angle of incidence of the incoming sound, and could not optimally handle multiple sound sources either. Brown (214) extended the strategy by estimating the angle of incidence in different frequency regions based on ITDs, resulting in an improved speech intelligibility for bilateral cochlear implant users. Moore et al. (216) evaluated a similar algorithm for bilateral hearing aid users, and found improved sound localization while speech perception was not significantly affected. Although the head shadow is essentially a monaural effect, all above-mentioned strategies start from a binaural perspective. This results in complex sound coding strategies that may be suboptimal or difficult to implement in current hearing aid or cochlear implant processors. Recently, Veugen et al. (217) evaluated a monaural strategy to improve access to high-frequency ILDs for bimodal listeners by applying frequency compression in the hearing aid. However, they did not find a significant improvement in sound localization. Moreover, frequency compression might result in undesired side-effects on speech intelligibility and sound quality (Simpson, 29). Once one recognizes the natural beamforming characteristic of an ear, an elegant way to optimize its behavior is the superposition of an electronic beamformer. We present a new method to artificially enhance the head shadow effect by supplying each ear with an electronic beamformer, focusing on sounds coming from the ipsilateral side. The method is able to enhance low frequency ILDs and resolve non-monotonic ILD-versus-angle functions. Therefore, we expect similar advantages in sound localization and speech intelligibility as those observed in above-cited papers for different hearing impaired populations, while our method does not require complex sound processing and naturally handles multiple sound sources. Since bimodal listeners have poor ITD perception and their residual hearing often has limited access to high frequencies, they have very poor localization performance(francart and McDermott, 213). Therefore, we validated the head shadow enhancement method in a localization experiment with simulated bimodal listeners. 2 of 9
3 2 2.1 Methods Head shadow enhancement We enhanced the directivity pattern of the ear with an end-fire delay-and-subtract directional microphone applied in low frequencies, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). To achieve beamforming behavior towards the ipsilateral side in each ear, a linear microphone array in the lateral direction was realized with a link between two devices. In this way, the microphone spacing equals the distance between the ears, approximately 2 cm. A large microphone spacing yields good sensitivity of the directional microphone at low frequencies (note that a frontal directional microphone in a behind-the-ear (BTE) device is usually not active at low frequencies because of its strong high pass characteristic (Ricketts and Henry, 22)). On the other hand, this large spacing decreases the sensitivity at frequencies above approximately 8 Hz due to the comb filter behavior of a subtractive array (Dillon, 21, Chapter 7); this was no issue, since we only enhanced the head shadow for low frequencies. In Fig. 1(b) it can be seen that the method results in a cardioid-like directivity pattern for low frequencies, while the natural directivity pattern of the ear remains unchanged for frequencies above 8 Hz. Figure 1: (a) Low frequencies of the right ear signal are sent to the left ear device, followed by delay-and-subtract to obtain low-frequency ipsilateral directionality. The same method is applied in the right ear device (not shown in the figure). (b) The method results in a cardioid-like directivity pattern for low frequencies, while the natural directivity pattern of the ear remains unchanged for frequencies above 8 Hz. 2.2 Simulations of spatial hearing Spatial hearing was simulated with head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). We measured the response of an omni-directional microphone in a BTE piece placed on a CORTEX MK2 human-like acoustical manikin. The manikin was positioned in the center of a localization arc with radius of approximately 1 m, with 13 loudspeakers positioned at 3 of 9
4 angles between 9 (left) and+9 (right) insteps of15. Head shadow enhancement was done by applying the method on the omni-directional HRTFs to obtain enhanced HRTFs. 2.3 Simulation of bimodal hearing We simulated bimodal hearing according to the methods of Francart et al. (29). CI listening was simulated in the left ear with an eight-channel noise band vocoder to mimic the behavior of a CI processor: the input signal was sent through an eight-channel filter bank; within each channel, the envelope was detected with half-wave rectification followed by a 5 Hz low pass filter; this envelope was used to modulate a noise band of which the spectrum corresponded to the respective filter; the outputs of all channels were summed to obtain a single acoustic signal. Severe hearing loss was simulated in the right ear with a sixth order low pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 5 Hz, such that the response rolled of at 36 db per octave. This corresponds with a ski-slope audiogram of a typical bimodal listener. In this simulation, no ITD cues could be used to localize sounds, which made our participants rely solely on ILD cues (Francart and McDermott, 213). 2.4 Participants We recruited 6 normal-hearing participants, aged between 24- and 26-years-old. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Leuven (S5897). 2.5 Experimental set-up The participant was seated in the same localization arc as where the HRTFs were measured. The loudspeakers were labeled with numbers 1 13 corresponding to angles between 9 (left) and +9 (right) in steps of 15. The loudspeakers served solely as a visual cue. The stimuli were presented through Sennheiser HDA2 over-the-ear headphones via an RME Hammerfall DSP Multiface soundcard, using the software platform APEX 3 (Francart et al., 28). 2.6 Stimuli We presented the Dutch word zoem ["zum] from the Lilliput speech material(van Wieringen, 213), uttered by a female talker and completely voiced. To limit the use of on-/offset ITD cues, we ramped the on- and offset with a 5 ms cosine window. 2.7 Procedure Localization performance was measured separately in a condition with head shadow enhancement and a condition without head shadow enhancement; the order of conditions was randomized across subjects. Each condition consisted of a block of 7 runs. The first 4 of 9
5 4 runs served as training to get used to the simulation; only the last 3 runs were considered in our analysis. Each run consisted of 3 trials per angle, resulting in 39 trials in total per run; the order of trials was randomized in each run. The participant was instructed to look straight ahead during stimulus presentation. Feedback was always given after the response by turning on a light emitting diode above the correct speaker for 2 s. The stimulus was calibrated separately for each condition, such that a signal from the front ( ) was presented at 65 dba in each ear. To avoid the use of monaural level cues for localization, the overall level was randomly roved by ±1 db. 3 Results The broadband ILDs of the stimulus after bimodal simulation for angles between 9 and +9 with or without head shadow enhancement are shown in Fig. 2(a). Head shadow enhancement resulted in a steeper and monotonic ILD-versus-angle function. The results of our psychophysical experiment are shown in Fig. 2(b) and (c). In Fig. 2(b), the mean response averaged across trials as a function the presentation angle is plotted per condition. The mean response is a measure of the bias in the response for a certain condition: the closer the mean is to the diagonal, the smaller the bias in response. In Fig. 2(c), the standard deviation (s.d.) in response across trials as a function the presentation angle is plotted per condition. The s.d. is a measure of the variability in the response for a certain condition: the lower the s.d., the smaller the variability in the response, and thus the more certain the participants were about their response. Error bars always represent the standard deviation across subjects. Both the bias and variability contribute to the total root-mean-square (RMS) error per condition. It can be seen that head shadow enhancement reduces both the bias and variability in response. Both for the bias and variability, the largest improvement is for large angles, corresponding well with the ILD curves of Fig. 2(a). 5 of 9
6 (a) (b) (c) Omni-directional microphones Broadband ILD [dba] Mean response [ ] mean RMS bias = Standard deviation on response [ ] mean RMS s.d. = Head shadow enhancement Broadband ILD [dba] Stimulus [ ] Mean response [ ] Standard deviation on response [ ] mean RMS bias = 14.3 mean RMS s.d. = Stimulus [ ] Stimulus [ ] Figure 2: Due to optimized interaural level differences (ILDs), head shadow enhancement significantly improved localization performance by 22.8 in RMS error. The total RMS error results from both the bias and the uncertainty in the responses. (a) Head shadow enhancement resulted in a steeper and monotonic ILD-versus-angle curve for the speech stimulus zoem in a bimodal simulation. (b) The mean response (averaged across trials) is a measure of the bias in the response: the closer to the diagonal (dashed line), the better the response. Head shadow enhancement decreases the bias especially for large angles, as can be expected from the interaural level difference (ILD) curves for our stimuli. Error bars represent the intersubject standard deviation. (c) The standard deviation (s.d.) in response (across trials) is a measure of how certain the listener is of his or her response: less uncertainty results in a smaller s.d.. Head shadow enhancement decreases the uncertainty for all angles, but especially for large angles. Error bars represent the inter-subject standard deviation. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare the RMS error averaged across all angles with condition as the independent variable. Head shadow enhancement significantly improved localization performance from a mean RMS error of 51.1 to a mean RMS error of 28.3, i.e., a mean improvement of 22.8 in RMS error (V = 21, p =.3, r =.62). 4 Discussion Head shadow enhancement yielded a steeper and monotonic ILD-versus-angle function, resulting in a large improvement in sound localization of 22.8 in RMS error. The error 6 of 9
7 (consisting of both the bias and uncertainty in response) was reduced especially at large angles, as could be expected from the ILD curves of our stimuli. In the condition without head shadow enhancement, we found a mean RMS error of 51.1, which is within the range reported for real bimodal listeners (Potts et al., 29; Ching et al., 27). This confirms the validity of our acoustic simulation of bimodal listening. Francart et al. (211) have indeed shown that their results for acoustic simulations of bimodal listening (Francart et al., 29) could be translated to real bimodal listeners. We expect similar improvements in localization for different populations, as ILD enhancement approaches have already been shown effective for real bimodal listeners(francart et al., 211) and bilateral hearing aid users (Moore et al., 216). Moore et al. (216) have even shown improvements in localization when ILD enhancement was combined with compressive gain. We also expect improvements in speech understanding in noisy environments for different populations. Firstly, when noise arrives from all directions, head shadow enhancement attenuates all noise from the contralateral side in each ear. This results in a bilateral improvement in signal-to-noise ratio. For example, with a speech source in front of the listener, we calculated a monaural speech-weighted signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement of 14 db with noise from the contralateral side, compared with a small decrease of 1 db with noise from the ipsilateral side. The small frontal attenuation might be resolved by superposing frontal directionality on high frequencies in each ear. Secondly, each ear can focus more uniquely on a target in a multi-talker environment. This is especially useful for cochlear implant users, for whom it is very hard to disentangle separate speech sources. ILD enhancement has indeed been shown effective to increase speech intelligibility for bilateral CI users in a multi-talker environment (Brown, 214). Thirdly, van Hoesel (215) has shown that improved localization allows listeners to orient towards talkers and gain access to visual cues, resulting in even larger improvements in speech intelligibility. Overall, the method seems very promising to be implemented in future devices, both due to its simplicity and its effectiveness. In future research, we will validate our method for different populations and investigate its effect on speech intelligibility in noise. Acknowledgments This research is funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (SB PhD fellow at FWO); this research is jointly funded by Cochlear Ltd. and Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (formerly IWT), project 15432; this project has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union s Horizon 22 research and innovation programme(grant agreement No , ERC starting Grant to Tom Francart). We thank our participants for their patience and enthusiasm during our experiment. 7 of 9
8 References Bronkhorst, A. and Plomp, R. (1988). The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(4): Brown, C. A. (214). Binaural enhancement for bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear and hearing, 35(5):58. Ching, T., Van Wanrooy, E., and Dillon, H. (27). Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends in amplification, 11(3): Dillon, H. (21). Hearing aids, volume 362. Boomerang press Sydney. Francart, T., Lenssen, A., and Wouters, J. (211). Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 13(5): Francart, T. and McDermott, H. J. (213). Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation. Ear and hearing, 34(6): Francart, T., Van den Bogaert, T., Moonen, M., and Wouters, J. (29). Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(6): Francart, T., Van Wieringen, A., and Wouters, J. (28). Apex 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 172(2): Francart, T., Wouters, J., and Van Dijk, B. (213). Localisation in a bilateral hearing device system. US Patent 8,53,74. Lopez-Poveda, E. A., Eustaquio-Martín, A., Stohl, J. S., Wolford, R. D., Schatzer, R., and Wilson, B. S. (216). A binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex. Ear and hearing, 37(3):e138. Moore, B. C., Kolarik, A., Stone, M. A., andlee, Y.-W. (216). Evaluationofamethodfor enhancing interaural level differences at low frequencies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 14(4): Potts, L. G., Skinner, M. W., Litovsky, R. A., Strube, M. J., and Kuk, F. (29). Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2(6): of 9
9 Rayleigh, L. (197). Xii. on our perception of sound direction. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 13(74): Ricketts, T. and Henry, P. (22). Low-frequency gain compensation in directional hearing aids. American Journal of Audiology, 11(1): Shaw, E. (1974). Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56(6): Simpson, A. (29). Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: A review. Trends in amplification, 13(2): van Hoesel, R. J. (215). Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 16(2): Van Wieringen, A. (213). The lilliput, an open-set cvc test for assessing speech in noise in 4-6 yr olds. In second annual B-audio conference November 213. Veugen, L. C., Chalupper, J., Mens, L. H., Snik, A. F., and van Opstal, A. J. (217). Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception. Cochlear Implants International, pages of 9
arxiv: v2 [eess.as] 14 Mar 2018
Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners arxiv:171.194v2 [eess.as] 14 Mar 218 Benjamin Dieudonné*, Tom Francart
More informationMinimum Audible Angles Measured with Simulated Normally-Sized and Oversized Pinnas for Normal-Hearing and Hearing- Impaired Test Subjects
Minimum Audible Angles Measured with Simulated Normally-Sized and Oversized Pinnas for Normal-Hearing and Hearing- Impaired Test Subjects Filip M. Rønne, Søren Laugesen, Niels S. Jensen and Julie H. Pedersen
More informationBinaural Hearing. Why two ears? Definitions
Binaural Hearing Why two ears? Locating sounds in space: acuity is poorer than in vision by up to two orders of magnitude, but extends in all directions. Role in alerting and orienting? Separating sound
More information3-D Sound and Spatial Audio. What do these terms mean?
3-D Sound and Spatial Audio What do these terms mean? Both terms are very general. 3-D sound usually implies the perception of point sources in 3-D space (could also be 2-D plane) whether the audio reproduction
More informationSound localization psychophysics
Sound localization psychophysics Eric Young A good reference: B.C.J. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing Chapter 7, Space Perception. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 233-267 (2004). Sound localization:
More informationSpeech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filter techniques in multimicrophone binaural hearing aids a)
1 2 Speech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filter techniques in multimicrophone binaural hearing aids a) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Tim Van den Bogaert b ExpORL,
More informationBinaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices
Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices Kostas Kokkinakis a) and Natalie Pak Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences and Disorders, University of Kansas,
More informationAUDL GS08/GAV1 Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Pitch & Binaural listening
AUDL GS08/GAV1 Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear Pitch & Binaural listening Review 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 100 1000 10000 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 100 1000 10000 Part I: Auditory frequency selectivity Tuning
More informationLocalization 103: Training BiCROS/CROS Wearers for Left-Right Localization
Localization 103: Training BiCROS/CROS Wearers for Left-Right Localization Published on June 16, 2015 Tech Topic: Localization July 2015 Hearing Review By Eric Seper, AuD, and Francis KuK, PhD While the
More informationA. SEK, E. SKRODZKA, E. OZIMEK and A. WICHER
ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS 29, 1, 25 34 (2004) INTELLIGIBILITY OF SPEECH PROCESSED BY A SPECTRAL CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT PROCEDURE AND A BINAURAL PROCEDURE A. SEK, E. SKRODZKA, E. OZIMEK and A. WICHER Institute
More informationThe development of a modified spectral ripple test
The development of a modified spectral ripple test Justin M. Aronoff a) and David M. Landsberger Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Research Institute, 2100 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, California
More informationThe use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users
The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users Justin M. Aronoff, a) Yang-soo Yoon, and Daniel J. Freed b) Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Ear Institute,
More informationAuditory System & Hearing
Auditory System & Hearing Chapters 9 and 10 Lecture 17 Jonathan Pillow Sensation & Perception (PSY 345 / NEU 325) Spring 2015 1 Cochlea: physical device tuned to frequency! place code: tuning of different
More informationEEL 6586, Project - Hearing Aids algorithms
EEL 6586, Project - Hearing Aids algorithms 1 Yan Yang, Jiang Lu, and Ming Xue I. PROBLEM STATEMENT We studied hearing loss algorithms in this project. As the conductive hearing loss is due to sound conducting
More informationDiscrimination and identification of azimuth using spectral shape a)
Discrimination and identification of azimuth using spectral shape a) Daniel E. Shub b Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute
More informationHearing the Universal Language: Music and Cochlear Implants
Hearing the Universal Language: Music and Cochlear Implants Professor Hugh McDermott Deputy Director (Research) The Bionics Institute of Australia, Professorial Fellow The University of Melbourne Overview?
More informationHearing in the Environment
10 Hearing in the Environment Click Chapter to edit 10 Master Hearing title in the style Environment Sound Localization Complex Sounds Auditory Scene Analysis Continuity and Restoration Effects Auditory
More informationBrian D. Simpson Veridian, 5200 Springfield Pike, Suite 200, Dayton, Ohio 45431
The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal Douglas S. Brungart a) Air Force Research Laboratory, 2610 Seventh Street, Wright-Patterson
More informationInfluence of acoustic complexity on spatial release from masking and lateralization
Influence of acoustic complexity on spatial release from masking and lateralization Gusztáv Lőcsei, Sébastien Santurette, Torsten Dau, Ewen N. MacDonald Hearing Systems Group, Department of Electrical
More informationSignals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Week 5. The peripheral auditory system: The ear as a signal processor
Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear Week 5 The peripheral auditory system: The ear as a signal processor Think of this set of organs 2 as a collection of systems, transforming sounds to be sent to
More informationEffect of spectral content and learning on auditory distance perception
Effect of spectral content and learning on auditory distance perception Norbert Kopčo 1,2, Dávid Čeljuska 1, Miroslav Puszta 1, Michal Raček 1 a Martin Sarnovský 1 1 Department of Cybernetics and AI, Technical
More informationEffect of microphone position in hearing instruments on binaural masking level differences
Effect of microphone position in hearing instruments on binaural masking level differences Fredrik Gran, Jesper Udesen and Andrew B. Dittberner GN ReSound A/S, Research R&D, Lautrupbjerg 7, 2750 Ballerup,
More informationNOISE REDUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR BETTER SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION- A SURVEY
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMPUTER APPLICATIONS AND ROBOTICS ISSN 2320-7345 NOISE REDUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR BETTER SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION- A SURVEY Preethi N.M 1, P.F Khaleelur
More informationInfluence of multi-microphone signal enhancement algorithms on auditory movement detection in acoustically complex situations
Syddansk Universitet Influence of multi-microphone signal enhancement algorithms on auditory movement detection in acoustically complex situations Lundbeck, Micha; Hartog, Laura; Grimm, Giso; Hohmann,
More informationThe effect of wearing conventional and level-dependent hearing protectors on speech production in noise and quiet
The effect of wearing conventional and level-dependent hearing protectors on speech production in noise and quiet Ghazaleh Vaziri Christian Giguère Hilmi R. Dajani Nicolas Ellaham Annual National Hearing
More informationPsychophysics, Fitting, and Signal Processing for Combined Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Stimulation
Psychophysics, Fitting, and Signal Processing for Combined Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Stimulation Tom Francart 1,2 and Hugh J. McDermott 2,3 The addition of acoustic stimulation to electric stimulation
More informationEvidence based selection of hearing aids and features
Evidence based selection of hearing aids and features Mark Laureyns Thomas More University College Department of Audiology Antwerp CRS - Amplifon Centre for Research & Studies Milan Italy European Association
More informationOpenSound Navigator for Oticon Opn Custom Instruments
w h i t e pa p e r 2018 OpenSound Navigator for Oticon Opn Custom Instruments Principles and Benefits in Noise SUMMARY The Opn family has grown and is now available in all custom styles, including both
More informationNeural correlates of the perception of sound source separation
Neural correlates of the perception of sound source separation Mitchell L. Day 1,2 * and Bertrand Delgutte 1,2,3 1 Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
More informationBinaural processing of complex stimuli
Binaural processing of complex stimuli Outline for today Binaural detection experiments and models Speech as an important waveform Experiments on understanding speech in complex environments (Cocktail
More informationChallenges in microphone array processing for hearing aids. Volkmar Hamacher Siemens Audiological Engineering Group Erlangen, Germany
Challenges in microphone array processing for hearing aids Volkmar Hamacher Siemens Audiological Engineering Group Erlangen, Germany SIEMENS Audiological Engineering Group R&D Signal Processing and Audiology
More informationHeath G. Jones, Alan Kan, and Ruth Y. Litovsky
The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users Heath G. Jones, Alan Kan, and Ruth Y. Litovsky
More informationBenefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness
Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness Ning Ma, 1 Saffron Morris, 1 and Pádraig Thomas Kitterick 2,3 Objectives:
More informationSonic Spotlight. SmartCompress. Advancing compression technology into the future
Sonic Spotlight SmartCompress Advancing compression technology into the future Speech Variable Processing (SVP) is the unique digital signal processing strategy that gives Sonic hearing aids their signature
More informationImplementation of Spectral Maxima Sound processing for cochlear. implants by using Bark scale Frequency band partition
Implementation of Spectral Maxima Sound processing for cochlear implants by using Bark scale Frequency band partition Han xianhua 1 Nie Kaibao 1 1 Department of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong
More informationWhy? Speech in Noise + Hearing Aids = Problems in Noise. Recall: Two things we must do for hearing loss: Directional Mics & Digital Noise Reduction
Directional Mics & Digital Noise Reduction Speech in Noise + Hearing Aids = Problems in Noise Why? Ted Venema PhD Recall: Two things we must do for hearing loss: 1. Improve audibility a gain issue achieved
More information3-D SOUND IMAGE LOCALIZATION BY INTERAURAL DIFFERENCES AND THE MEDIAN PLANE HRTF. Masayuki Morimoto Motokuni Itoh Kazuhiro Iida
3-D SOUND IMAGE LOCALIZATION BY INTERAURAL DIFFERENCES AND THE MEDIAN PLANE HRTF Masayuki Morimoto Motokuni Itoh Kazuhiro Iida Kobe University Environmental Acoustics Laboratory Rokko, Nada, Kobe, 657-8501,
More informationA NOVEL HEAD-RELATED TRANSFER FUNCTION MODEL BASED ON SPECTRAL AND INTERAURAL DIFFERENCE CUES
A NOVEL HEAD-RELATED TRANSFER FUNCTION MODEL BASED ON SPECTRAL AND INTERAURAL DIFFERENCE CUES Kazuhiro IIDA, Motokuni ITOH AV Core Technology Development Center, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
More informationEssential feature. Who are cochlear implants for? People with little or no hearing. substitute for faulty or missing inner hair
Who are cochlear implants for? Essential feature People with little or no hearing and little conductive component to the loss who receive little or no benefit from a hearing aid. Implants seem to work
More informationLinking dynamic-range compression across the ears can improve speech intelligibility in spatially separated noise
Linking dynamic-range compression across the ears can improve speech intelligibility in spatially separated noise Ian M. Wiggins a) and Bernhard U. Seeber b) MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University
More informationAdaptive dynamic range compression for improving envelope-based speech perception: Implications for cochlear implants
Adaptive dynamic range compression for improving envelope-based speech perception: Implications for cochlear implants Ying-Hui Lai, Fei Chen and Yu Tsao Abstract The temporal envelope is the primary acoustic
More informationWho are cochlear implants for?
Who are cochlear implants for? People with little or no hearing and little conductive component to the loss who receive little or no benefit from a hearing aid. Implants seem to work best in adults who
More informationUvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Perceptual evaluation of noise reduction in hearing aids Brons, I. Link to publication
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Perceptual evaluation of noise reduction in hearing aids Brons, I. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Brons, I. (2013). Perceptual evaluation
More informationGroup Delay or Processing Delay
Bill Cole BASc, PEng Group Delay or Processing Delay The terms Group Delay (GD) and Processing Delay (PD) have often been used interchangeably when referring to digital hearing aids. Group delay is the
More informationSpatial hearing and sound localization mechanisms in the brain. Henri Pöntynen February 9, 2016
Spatial hearing and sound localization mechanisms in the brain Henri Pöntynen February 9, 2016 Outline Auditory periphery: from acoustics to neural signals - Basilar membrane - Organ of Corti Spatial
More informationSpatial processing in adults with hearing loss
Spatial processing in adults with hearing loss Harvey Dillon Helen Glyde Sharon Cameron, Louise Hickson, Mark Seeto, Jörg Buchholz, Virginia Best creating sound value TM www.hearingcrc.org Spatial processing
More informationThe perception of speech in noise with bilateral and bimodal hearing devices
The perception of speech in noise with bilateral and bimodal hearing devices Tim Schoof Master s Thesis Linguistics: The Study of the Language Faculty Utrecht University Supervisor: Dr. Bert M.E.H. Schouten
More informationCochlear implant patients localization using interaural level differences exceeds that of untrained normal hearing listeners
Cochlear implant patients localization using interaural level differences exceeds that of untrained normal hearing listeners Justin M. Aronoff a) Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Research
More informationDigital. hearing instruments have burst on the
Testing Digital and Analog Hearing Instruments: Processing Time Delays and Phase Measurements A look at potential side effects and ways of measuring them by George J. Frye Digital. hearing instruments
More informationKEY WORDS: hearing preservation, localization, cochlear implants, hearing aids, acoustic hearing
Sound source localization by hearing preservation patients with and without symmetric, low-frequency acoustic hearing Louise H. Loiselle 1, Michael F. Dorman 1, William A. Yost 1, Rene H. Gifford 2 1 Arizona
More informationWhite Paper: micon Directivity and Directional Speech Enhancement
White Paper: micon Directivity and Directional Speech Enhancement www.siemens.com Eghart Fischer, Henning Puder, Ph. D., Jens Hain Abstract: This paper describes a new, optimized directional processing
More informationThe role of low frequency components in median plane localization
Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 24, 2 (23) PAPER The role of low components in median plane localization Masayuki Morimoto 1;, Motoki Yairi 1, Kazuhiro Iida 2 and Motokuni Itoh 1 1 Environmental Acoustics Laboratory,
More informationA Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification
11 A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification Proceedings of the 7th International Conference 2016 Hear well or hearsay? Do modern wireless technologies improve hearing performance in CI users? Jace
More informationSystems Neuroscience Oct. 16, Auditory system. http:
Systems Neuroscience Oct. 16, 2018 Auditory system http: www.ini.unizh.ch/~kiper/system_neurosci.html The physics of sound Measuring sound intensity We are sensitive to an enormous range of intensities,
More informationCOM3502/4502/6502 SPEECH PROCESSING
COM3502/4502/6502 SPEECH PROCESSING Lecture 4 Hearing COM3502/4502/6502 Speech Processing: Lecture 4, slide 1 The Speech Chain SPEAKER Ear LISTENER Feedback Link Vocal Muscles Ear Sound Waves Taken from:
More informationCharacterizing individual hearing loss using narrow-band loudness compensation
Characterizing individual hearing loss using narrow-band loudness compensation DIRK OETTING 1,2,*, JENS-E. APPELL 1, VOLKER HOHMANN 2, AND STEPHAN D. EWERT 2 1 Project Group Hearing, Speech and Audio Technology
More informationHaving Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees
Having Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees Joshua G. W. Bernstein, 1 Matthew J. Goupell, 2 Gerald I. Schuchman,
More informationHOW TO USE THE SHURE MXA910 CEILING ARRAY MICROPHONE FOR VOICE LIFT
HOW TO USE THE SHURE MXA910 CEILING ARRAY MICROPHONE FOR VOICE LIFT Created: Sept 2016 Updated: June 2017 By: Luis Guerra Troy Jensen The Shure MXA910 Ceiling Array Microphone offers the unique advantage
More informationRelease from informational masking in a monaural competingspeech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally
Release from informational masking in a monaural competingspeech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally Joshua G. W. Bernstein a) National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology
More informationIMPROVING CHANNEL SELECTION OF SOUND CODING ALGORITHMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS. Hussnain Ali, Feng Hong, John H. L. Hansen, and Emily Tobey
2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) IMPROVING CHANNEL SELECTION OF SOUND CODING ALGORITHMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS Hussnain Ali, Feng Hong, John H. L. Hansen,
More informationHCS 7367 Speech Perception
Long-term spectrum of speech HCS 7367 Speech Perception Connected speech Absolute threshold Males Dr. Peter Assmann Fall 212 Females Long-term spectrum of speech Vowels Males Females 2) Absolute threshold
More informationHST.723J, Spring 2005 Theme 3 Report
HST.723J, Spring 2005 Theme 3 Report Madhu Shashanka shashanka@cns.bu.edu Introduction The theme of this report is binaural interactions. Binaural interactions of sound stimuli enable humans (and other
More information21/01/2013. Binaural Phenomena. Aim. To understand binaural hearing Objectives. Understand the cues used to determine the location of a sound source
Binaural Phenomena Aim To understand binaural hearing Objectives Understand the cues used to determine the location of a sound source Understand sensitivity to binaural spatial cues, including interaural
More informationThe role of periodicity in the perception of masked speech with simulated and real cochlear implants
The role of periodicity in the perception of masked speech with simulated and real cochlear implants Kurt Steinmetzger and Stuart Rosen UCL Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences Heidelberg, 09. November
More informationWhat Is the Difference between db HL and db SPL?
1 Psychoacoustics What Is the Difference between db HL and db SPL? The decibel (db ) is a logarithmic unit of measurement used to express the magnitude of a sound relative to some reference level. Decibels
More informationThe contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations Spring 2011 The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance Ann Elizabeth Perreau
More informationAn Auditory System Modeling in Sound Source Localization
An Auditory System Modeling in Sound Source Localization Yul Young Park The University of Texas at Austin EE381K Multidimensional Signal Processing May 18, 2005 Abstract Sound localization of the auditory
More informationSpeech conveys not only linguistic content but. Vocal Emotion Recognition by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users
Cochlear Implants Special Issue Article Vocal Emotion Recognition by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users Trends in Amplification Volume 11 Number 4 December 2007 301-315 2007 Sage Publications
More information19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 THE DUPLEX-THEORY OF LOCALIZATION INVESTIGATED UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS
19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 27 THE DUPLEX-THEORY OF LOCALIZATION INVESTIGATED UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS PACS: 43.66.Pn Seeber, Bernhard U. Auditory Perception Lab, Dept.
More informationEvidence-based Design Leads to Remote Microphone Hearing Instrument Technology
Copyright 2013 AudiologyOnline - All Rights Reserved Evidence-based Design Leads to Remote Microphone Hearing Instrument Technology Steve Hallenbeck, AuD, Jenny Groth, MA December 12, 2011 Introduction
More informationBinaural Hearing. Steve Colburn Boston University
Binaural Hearing Steve Colburn Boston University Outline Why do we (and many other animals) have two ears? What are the major advantages? What is the observed behavior? How do we accomplish this physiologically?
More informationTOLERABLE DELAY FOR SPEECH PROCESSING: EFFECTS OF HEARING ABILITY AND ACCLIMATISATION
TOLERABLE DELAY FOR SPEECH PROCESSING: EFFECTS OF HEARING ABILITY AND ACCLIMATISATION Tobias Goehring, PhD Previous affiliation (this project): Institute of Sound and Vibration Research University of Southampton
More informationLocalization: Give your patients a listening edge
Localization: Give your patients a listening edge For those of us with healthy auditory systems, localization skills are often taken for granted. We don t even notice them, until they are no longer working.
More informationHearIntelligence by HANSATON. Intelligent hearing means natural hearing.
HearIntelligence by HANSATON. HearIntelligence by HANSATON. Intelligent hearing means natural hearing. Acoustic environments are complex. We are surrounded by a variety of different acoustic signals, speech
More informationModeling HRTF For Sound Localization in Normal Listeners and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2013 Modeling HRTF For Sound Localization in Normal Listeners and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users Douglas
More informationWhy directional microphone technology for young children?
Directional effects on young children In real life Teresa YC Ching 1, Harvey Dillon 1, Anna O Brien 1, Lisa Hartley 1, Josef Chalupper 2, David Hartley 1, George Raicevich 1, Catherine Morgan 1 1 National
More informationEssential feature. Who are cochlear implants for? People with little or no hearing. substitute for faulty or missing inner hair
Who are cochlear implants for? Essential feature People with little or no hearing and little conductive component to the loss who receive little or no benefit from a hearing aid. Implants seem to work
More informationSensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation
JARO 10: 131 141 (2008) DOI: 10.7/s10162-008-0145-8 JARO Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic
More informationBORDERLINE PATIENTS AND THE BRIDGE BETWEEN HEARING AIDS AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
BORDERLINE PATIENTS AND THE BRIDGE BETWEEN HEARING AIDS AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTS Richard C Dowell Graeme Clark Chair in Audiology and Speech Science The University of Melbourne, Australia Hearing Aid Developers
More informationLindsay De Souza M.Cl.Sc AUD Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders
Critical Review: Do Personal FM Systems Improve Speech Perception Ability for Aided and/or Unaided Pediatric Listeners with Minimal to Mild, and/or Unilateral Hearing Loss? Lindsay De Souza M.Cl.Sc AUD
More informationLocalization in the Presence of a Distracter and Reverberation in the Frontal Horizontal Plane. I. Psychoacoustical Data
942 955 Localization in the Presence of a Distracter and Reverberation in the Frontal Horizontal Plane. I. Psychoacoustical Data Jonas Braasch, Klaus Hartung Institut für Kommunikationsakustik, Ruhr-Universität
More informationValidation Studies. How well does this work??? Speech perception (e.g., Erber & Witt 1977) Early Development... History of the DSL Method
DSL v5.: A Presentation for the Ontario Infant Hearing Program Associates The Desired Sensation Level (DSL) Method Early development.... 198 Goal: To develop a computer-assisted electroacoustic-based procedure
More informationRole of F0 differences in source segregation
Role of F0 differences in source segregation Andrew J. Oxenham Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT and Harvard-MIT Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program Rationale Many aspects of segregation
More informationA Microphone-Array-Based System for Restoring Sound Localization with Occluded Ears
Restoring Sound Localization with Occluded Ears Adelbert W. Bronkhorst TNO Human Factors P.O. Box 23, 3769 ZG Soesterberg The Netherlands adelbert.bronkhorst@tno.nl Jan A. Verhave TNO Human Factors P.O.
More informationCONTACTLESS HEARING AID DESIGNED FOR INFANTS
CONTACTLESS HEARING AID DESIGNED FOR INFANTS M. KULESZA 1, B. KOSTEK 1,2, P. DALKA 1, A. CZYŻEWSKI 1 1 Gdansk University of Technology, Multimedia Systems Department, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-952 Gdansk,
More informationEffects of Cochlear Hearing Loss on the Benefits of Ideal Binary Masking
INTERSPEECH 2016 September 8 12, 2016, San Francisco, USA Effects of Cochlear Hearing Loss on the Benefits of Ideal Binary Masking Vahid Montazeri, Shaikat Hossain, Peter F. Assmann University of Texas
More informationSonic Spotlight. Binaural Coordination: Making the Connection
Binaural Coordination: Making the Connection 1 Sonic Spotlight Binaural Coordination: Making the Connection Binaural Coordination is the global term that refers to the management of wireless technology
More informationEvaluation of Auditory Characteristics of Communications and Hearing Protection Systems (C&HPS) Part III Auditory Localization
Evaluation of Auditory Characteristics of Communications and Hearing Protection Systems (C&HPS) Part III Auditory Localization by Paula P. Henry ARL-TR-6560 August 2013 Approved for public release; distribution
More informationModeling individual loudness perception in cochlear implant recipients with normal contralateral hearing
Modeling individual loudness perception in cochlear implant recipients with normal contralateral hearing JOSEF CHALUPPER * Advanced Bionics GmbH, European Research Center, Hannover, Germany Use of acoustic
More informationHearing. Juan P Bello
Hearing Juan P Bello The human ear The human ear Outer Ear The human ear Middle Ear The human ear Inner Ear The cochlea (1) It separates sound into its various components If uncoiled it becomes a tapering
More informationIN EAR TO OUT THERE: A MAGNITUDE BASED PARAMETERIZATION SCHEME FOR SOUND SOURCE EXTERNALIZATION. Griffin D. Romigh, Brian D. Simpson, Nandini Iyer
IN EAR TO OUT THERE: A MAGNITUDE BASED PARAMETERIZATION SCHEME FOR SOUND SOURCE EXTERNALIZATION Griffin D. Romigh, Brian D. Simpson, Nandini Iyer 711th Human Performance Wing Air Force Research Laboratory
More informationStudy of perceptual balance for binaural dichotic presentation
Paper No. 556 Proceedings of 20 th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010 23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Study of perceptual balance for binaural dichotic presentation Pandurangarao N. Kulkarni
More informationSpeech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting
Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting Philipos C. Loizou a and Yi Hu Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
More informationSpeechZone 2. Author Tina Howard, Au.D., CCC-A, FAAA Senior Validation Specialist Unitron Favorite sound: wind chimes
SpeechZone 2 Difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments is the biggest complaint for those with hearing loss. 1 In the real world, important speech doesn t always come from in front of the listener.
More informationFREQUENCY COMPOSITION : A NEW APPROACH TO FREQUENCY- LOWERING
FREQUENCY COMPOSITION : A NEW APPROACH TO FREQUENCY- LOWERING -lowering has come a long way. Over time, the technique has evolved from a controversial feature to one that is gaining more and more acceptance.
More informationHybrid Masking Algorithm for Universal Hearing Aid System
Hybrid Masking Algorithm for Universal Hearing Aid System H.Hensiba 1,Mrs.V.P.Brila 2, 1 Pg Student, Applied Electronics, C.S.I Institute Of Technology 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics
More informationBest Practice Protocols
Best Practice Protocols SoundRecover for children What is SoundRecover? SoundRecover (non-linear frequency compression) seeks to give greater audibility of high-frequency everyday sounds by compressing
More informationProceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics Volume 19, 2013 http://acousticalsociety.org/ ICA 2013 Montreal Montreal, Canada 2-7 June 2013 Psychological and Physiological Acoustics Session 4aPPb: Binaural Hearing
More informationBenefit of Advanced Directional Microphones for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
Benefit of Advanced Directional Microphones for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users Andreas Büchner 1, Wiebke Heeren 2, Silke Klawitter 1, Thomas Lenarz 1 1 Medical University of Hannover, Department of Otolaryngology,
More information