Deception Detection Accuracy
|
|
- Thomasine Maxwell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 Deception Detection Accuracy Judee K. Burgoon University of Arizona, USA The ability of technologies and humans to detect deception varies widely. Based on estimates derived from signal detection theory, the detection rate for unaided humans falls far short of instruments used to measure veracity. Research investigating whether human detection rates can be improved sufficiently to reach parity with the best technologies has addressed factors such as demographics, personality, and cognitive factors that produce biased rather than accurate judgments, and how resultant inaccuracies can be mitigated through training and other interventions. Signal detection theory Contemporary detection accuracy research relies on signal detection theory (Green & Swets, 1966) to produce various calculations of accurate or inaccurate detection. Hits (also known as the true positive rate, TPR, or the genuine accept ratio, GAR, or sensitivity) are the percentage of actual target cases (in this case, deception) that are classified accurately by judges or instruments as deceit. Misses (also known as the false negative rate, FNR, or false negatives) are the percentage of actual target cases of deception that are erroneously misclassified as truthful. False alarms (also called false positive rate, FPR, or false accept rate, FAR) are the percentage of nontarget (truthful) cases that are erroneously identified as deceptive. True negatives (or true negative rate, TNR) are the percentage of truthful cases that are correctly identified as truthful. The relationships among these terms are shown in Figure 1. Other labels that are frequently used to refer to classification accuracy are sensitivity, the ability to detect deception when it is present, and specificity, the ability to recognize truth when it is present. Highest accuracy occurs when true deception is identified along with a low rate of false alarms. In graphical form, this is displayed as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, shown in Figure 2. The y axis represents how sensitive the judge or instrument is in detecting true deception. The x axis shows how specific the judge or instrument is by not committing false alarms and identifying actual truths as truths. The diagonal line on the graph represents chance. The farther the ROC moves away from chance and toward the upper left corner, the higher the accuracy in classifying both deception and truth. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, First Edition. Edited by Charles R. Berger and Michael E. Roloff John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: / wbeic0106
2 2 Actual Predicted Truth Deception Truth True negative TPR False alarm FPR Deception Miss FNR Hit TPR Figure 1 Types of signal detection theory classifications. 1.0 AUC = True positive rate False positive rate Figure 2 Sample receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. One way to commit errors is to have a truth bias, which is overestimating truth relative to actual truth. (A less common bias, lie bias, consists of declaring more of a target s messages as lies than are actually deceptive.) Humans have a strong tendency to be truth biased, believing others are being truthful. This bias can lead to the appearance of high accuracy in judging truth just by judging every message as truthful. This would result in 100% truth accuracy but all the deception cases would be missed, resulting in 0% deception detection accuracy. The goal is to minimize errors in both types of judgments. The ROC provides a handy way to visualize if judgments are biased one way or another. Detection accuracy by instrumentation When the lay public thinks of lie detection, the first thing that comes to mind is the polygraph. The polygraph is the standard against which other devices and human judgments are typically compared. In 2003, the National Academy of Sciences
3 issued a report that raised serious questions about the validity of the polygraph and the science behind it. The polygraph was seen as most valid and reliable when used for specific issue criminal investigations. The report was more critical about its use for employment screening and projected future misconduct. Subsequently, the American Polygraph Association established stringent standards. Evidentiary event specific diagnostic examinations were required to achieve a criterion accuracy rate of.90 or higher with no more than.20 inconclusive judgments. A meta analysis that assessed the effectiveness of the polygraph in achieving high sensitivity (Gougler et al., 2011) showed that after removing outliers, the accuracy aggregated across multiple nonindependent questions was.89 with an inconclusive rate of.11. (Other specific techniques produced somewhat lower rates of.85 to.87 accuracy.) These results create a very high bar against which other instruments and humans can be compared. Other lie detection instruments that have been tested and fielded include, among others, computerized vocal stress analysis, layered voice analysis, electroencephalograph (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri), and brain fingerprinting. Some of these devices have received significant empirical testing, with mixed results; others have yet to be subjected to rigorous validation and replication research. For example, several tests of voice assessment instruments have found that they are not more accurate than chance but tests of some of the features produced by the instruments have achieved high levels of accuracy. Claims made in the popular literature and by manufacturers selling these devices to law enforcement far outstrip the accuracy found when rigorous testing results are available. The jury is therefore still out on how accurately instruments beyond the polygraph classify truth-tellers and prevaricators. 3 Detection accuracy by humans Far more research has investigated humans ability to judge accurately the veracity of another. Meta analyses (e.g., Hartwig & Bond, 2011) have shown that unaided detection ability by humans averages 54%, which is only slightly better than chance. That estimate combines accuracy in detecting truth and accuracy in detecting deceit. When separate estimates are calculated, truth detection accuracy approximates 61% and deception detection accuracy approximates 47%, which is below chance. This dismal showing for human judges comes largely from studies using students and laypeople rather than professionals trained in judging deceit. Several investigations and meta analyses, however, have reported that trained professionals do not fare much better (and sometimes fare worse) than untrained individuals, leading to disputes about whether professionals are in fact more accurate or merely more confident and lie biased than novices (Meissner & Kassin, 2002). A significant amount of research continues to address this question of whether training actually improves accuracy and, if so, what features such as feedback, repeated sessions, computer aids, and training in telltale content, language, or nonverbal behaviors are most beneficial (e.g., Crews, Cao, Lin, Nunamaker, & Burgoon, 2007; Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).
4 4 Moderators of detection accuracy The mixed results on detection success have led to pursuit of numerous factors that might moderate accurate detection. Among the factors that have been thought to make a difference are these: base rate; deceiver social skills; judge s detection skills; context and amount of exposure; questioning strategies. Base rate Base rate refers to the proportion of deceptive stimuli to truthful stimuli that are to be judged. The more judges are exposed to truthful rather than deceptive cases, the more accurate they are likely to be, due to their truth bias (Levine, Kim, Park, & Hughes, 2006). This has been called the veracity effect because judgments of truthfulness are a function of the proportion of truthful utterances to which the judge is exposed. If there are very few instances of deception, it becomes difficult to spot them. Deceiver social skills Some communicators just naturally look truthful and are more masterful at appearing believable. The greater the sender s skill, the more difficult for their deceit to be detected (Burgoon, Buller, & Guerrero, 1995). Conversely, the poorer the sender s skill, the more transparent the lies will be and therefore more readily detected (Bond & DePaulo, 2008). Part of the skill may also be the deceiver s motivation to succeed. Those reporting higher motivation are judged as more credible and evade detection when lying. Judge s detection skills Contrary to much early hypothesizing, it appears that there is very little difference among judges in their individual skills at detecting deceit (Bond & DePaulo, 2008). Although the provocative notion that some people are wizards at detecting deception has been bandied about, the empirical evidence does not support there being a special class of gifted individuals at detecting deception. Efforts to find such individuals who share common characteristics that would explain their accuracy have failed. Instead, it appears that humans are similarly poor in their ability to recognize lies and other forms of dissembling. Context and amount of exposure Many of the studies showing poor detection accuracy by humans are based on studies in which judges see, hear, or read very brief samples of truthful and deceptive utterances extracted from unknown circumstances and must declare them as truth or deception.
5 When judges are given more context about where the utterances have come from, have access to more of what was said and done prior to and following the samples, and have exposure to longer samples of discourse, their accuracy rates improve. For example, professionals who have access to an entire interview attain much higher accuracy than those who must pass judgment based on very brief snippets. 5 Questioning strategies Recent research has begun to delve more deeply into understanding what kinds of questions expose interviewee deceit. While assorted questioning techniques have been the staple of professional training in interviewing and interrogation, academic research has begun to put various strategies to the test. Benign control questions intended to elicit a baseline of neutral responding are compared to ones intended to create an emotional charge or greater cognitive exertion. The behavioral analysis interview goes beyond questioning about details of a crime to assess respondents willingness to help solve the crime (the Sherlock Holmes effect ) and their attitudes about the crime and possible punishment. The cognitive interview requires repeated and deeper inquiry that should elicit more cognitive engagement and amplification by truthful respondents. Strategic withholding of evidence until later in the interview creates possible story conflicts that guilty parties must resolve. Increasing cognitive exertion by requiring narrative retellings in reverse order should prove more taxing for deceivers than truth-tellers, thereby showing more tells of deception. Asking unexpected questions that blindside the interviewee may expose more contradictions and hesitations by deceivers. Other strategies under test include interspersing opinion questions that indirectly reveal guilt and employing questions that make indirect accusations. These varied interviewing techniques may reveal the extent to which indicators of deceit are linked to specific kinds of questions and circumstances and should only be taken as signs of deceit when those circumstances are in force. To the extent that the detection of deceit becomes more nuanced, a ccuracy may improve. SEE ALSO: Deceptive Message Production; Interpersonal Deception Theory References Bond, J. C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, doi: / Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Guerrero, L. K. (1995). Interpersonal deception: IX. Effects of social skill and nonverbal communication on deception success and detection accuracy. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, doi: / X Crews, J. M., Cao, J., Lin, M., et al. (2007). A comparison of instructor led vs. web based training for detecting deception. Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math Education, 8, Gougler, M., Nelson, R., Handler, M., et al. (2011). Meta analytic survey of criterion accuracy of validated polygraph techniques. Polygraph, 40, Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
6 6 Hartwig, M., & Bond Jr., C. F. (2011). Why do lie catchers fail? A lens model meta analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), doi: /a Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, doi: / Levine, T. R., Kim, R. K., Park, H. S., & Hughes, M. (2006). Deception detection accuracy is a predictable linear function of message veracity base rate: A formal test of Park and Levine s probability model. Communication Monographs, 73, doi: / Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). He s guilty! : Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 5, doi: /A: Further reading Driskell, J. E. (2012). Effectiveness of deception detection training: A meta analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(8), doi: / X Frank, M. G., & Feeley, T. H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (Eds.). (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Memon, A. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (2nd ed.) Chichester, UK: Wiley. Judee K. Burgoon is professor of communication and director of research for the Center for the Management of Information, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, USA. She is a fellow of the International Communication Association, recipient of the ICA Steven B. Chaffee Career Achievement Award, National Communication Association distinguished scholar, and Mark L. Knapp Award in Interpersonal Communication. Her current research, which has been supported extensively with extramural funding, centers on interpersonal deception and automated deception detection. She has published eight books and monographs and over 300 articles and chapters related to interpersonal, nonverbal, and verbal communication.
Deception and its detection - A brief overview
Deception and its detection - A brief overview Franziska Clemens, PhD candidate Department of Psychology University of Gothenburg Overview Deception Deception Detection How good are people at detecting
More informationThe Detection of Deception. Dr. Helen Paterson Phone:
The Detection of Deception Dr. Helen Paterson Phone: 9036 9403 Email: helen.paterson@sydney.edu.au The Plan Background Behavioural indicators of deception Content indicators of deception Difficulties in
More informationDeceptive Communication Behavior during the Interview Process: An Annotated Bibliography. Angela Q. Glass. November 3, 2008
Running head: DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR Deceptive Communication Behavior 1 Deceptive Communication Behavior during the Interview Process: An Annotated Bibliography Angela Q. Glass November 3, 2008
More informationDeception detection: Effects of conversational involvement and probing
Deception detection: Effects of conversational involvement and probing Maria Hartwig Pär Anders Granhag Leif A. Strömwall Department of Psychology, Göteborg University Aldert Vrij Department of Psychology,
More informationHow to Become Better at Lie Detection. Aldert Vrij University of Portsmouth Psychology Department
How to Become Better at Lie Detection Aldert Vrij University of Portsmouth Psychology Department Email: aldert.vrij@port.ac.uk Key points of my talk People are poor human lie detectors Cues to deception
More informationNo Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of Polygraphy. John JB Allen, Ph.D. University of Arizona
No Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of Polygraphy John JB Allen, Ph.D. University of Arizona No Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of Polygraphy John JB Allen, Ph.D. University of Arizona jallen.faculty.arizona.edu/polygraph
More informationOn Lie Detection Wizards
Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 1, February 2007 ( C 2007) DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1 On Lie Detection Wizards Charles F. Bond Jr. 1,3 and Ahmet Uysal 2 Published online: 13 January 2007 M. O
More informationUniversity of Huddersfield Repository
University of Huddersfield Repository Duran, N.D. and Street, Chris N. H. Nonverbal cues Original Citation Duran, N.D. and Street, Chris N. H. (2014) Nonverbal cues. In: Encyclopedia of Deception. Sage,
More informationWhich Lie Detection Tools are Ready for Use in the Criminal Justice System? Aldert Vrij 1. University of Portsmouth (UK) Ronald P Fisher
Lie Detection Tools 1 Which Lie Detection Tools are Ready for Use in the Criminal Justice System? Aldert Vrij 1 University of Portsmouth (UK) Ronald P Fisher Florida International University (USA) 1 Correspondence
More informationIncreasing Deception Detection Accuracy with Strategic Questioning
Human Communication Research ISSN 0360-3989 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Increasing Deception Detection Accuracy with Strategic Questioning Timothy R. Levine, Allison Shaw, & Hillary C. Shulman Department of Communication,
More informationCatching liars: training mental health and legal professionals to detect high-stakes lies
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.752025 Catching liars: training mental health and legal professionals to detect high-stakes lies Julia Shaw*,
More informationCREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT: PITFALLS AND OPPORTUNITIES. Dr Lucy Akehurst University of Portsmouth Psychology Department
CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT: PITFALLS AND OPPORTUNITIES Dr Lucy Akehurst University of Portsmouth Psychology Department Email: lucy.akehurst@port.ac.uk CUES TO DECEIT What are nonverbal cues? Based on the research
More informationNo Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of Polygraphy. No Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of Polygraphy. Roadmap. The Polygraph Test
Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of y John JB Allen, Ph.D. University of Arizona Lie! Caveats and Cautions in the use of y John JB Allen, Ph.D. University of Arizona The Test does not detect lies The
More informationDeception Detection Accuracy Using Verbal or Nonverbal Cues
The Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 9 Journal of Undergraduate Research, Volume 9: 2011 Article 9 2011 Deception Detection Accuracy Using Verbal or Nonverbal Cues Caroline Hicks South Dakota State
More informationM. ORCID: (2017) 14 (3) ISSN
This is a peer reviewed, post print (final draft post refereeing) version of the following published document, This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Wright C, Wheatcroft JM. Police
More informationInformation Gain of the Directed Lie Screening Test
Information Gain of the Directed Lie Screening Test Mark Handler, Charles R. Honts, and Raymond Nelson 1 Abstract We adapted the Information Gain (IG) analysis procedures described by Honts and Schweinle
More informationGetting into the Minds of Pairs of Liars and Truth Tellers: An Examination of Their Strategies
The Open Criminology Journal, 2010, 3, 17-22 17 Open Access Getting into the Minds of Pairs of and : An Examination of Their Strategies Aldert Vrij *,1, Samantha Mann 1, Sharon Leal 1 and Pär Anders Granhag
More informationInside Criminal Minds: Offenders Strategies when Lying
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling J. Investig. Psych. Offender Profil. 8: 271 281 (2011) Published online 13 September 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com)..148
More informationBrain Fingerprinting Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Brain Fingerprinting Technology 1 Ms.J.R.Rajput, 2 Ms. P.M. Deshpande, 3 Prof.A.R.Wadhekar. 1 (Department of Electronics & Communication, Deogiri Institute of Engg.& Management
More informationYou're guilty, so just confess! : The psychology of interrogations and false confessions
You're guilty, so just confess! : The psychology of interrogations and false confessions Christian A. Meissner, Ph.D. Departments of Psychology & Criminal Justice Email: cmeissner@utep.edu Marty Tankleff
More informationA Review of Applied Techniques of the Detection of Criminal Deceit
Canadian Social Science Vol. 10, No. 6, 2014, pp. 24-28 DOI:10.3968/5169 ISSN 1712-8056[Print] ISSN 1923-6697[Online] www.cscanada.net www.cscanada.org A Review of Applied Techniques of the Detection of
More informationSleepy Suspects Are Way More Likely to Falsely Confess to a Crime By Adam Hoffman 2016
Name: Class: Sleepy Suspects Are Way More Likely to Falsely Confess to a Crime By Adam Hoffman 2016 Sleep deprivation is a common form of interrogation used by law enforcement to extract information from
More informationExpertise in Deception Detection Involves Actively Prompting Diagnostic Information Rather Than Passive Behavioral Observation
Human Communication Research ISSN 0360-3989 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Expertise in Deception Detection Involves Actively Prompting Diagnostic Information Rather Than Passive Behavioral Observation Timothy Roland
More informationLie Detection Accuracy the Role of Age and the Use of Emotions as a Reliable Cue
J Police Crim Psych (2017) 32:300 304 DOI 10.1007/s11896-016-9222-9 Lie Detection Accuracy the Role of Age and the Use of Emotions as a Reliable Cue Hannah Shaw 1 & Minna Lyons 1 Published online: 3 December
More informationAudit Inquiries and Deception Detection: Standards, Research, and Guidance. Donald L. Ariail J. P. Blair L. Murphy Smith *
Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting Vol. 2, Issue 1 Audit Inquiries and Deception Detection: Standards, Research, and Guidance Donald L. Ariail J. P. Blair L. Murphy Smith * Deception/lying
More informationApplied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2014, 10(1)
An Investigation of Accuracy and Bias in Cross-Cultural Lie Detection Paola A. Castillo, Graham Tyson and David Mallard Charles Sturt University The detection of deception has been relatively unexplored
More informationComputer-aided Credibility Assessment by Novice Lie-Catchers
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) AMCIS 2007 Proceedings Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) December 2007 Computer-aided Credibility Assessment by Novice
More informationThe Effect of Cognitive Load on Liars and Truth Tellers: Exploring the Moderating Impact of Working Memory Capacity
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Graduate Center 2-2016 The Effect of Cognitive Load on Liars and Truth Tellers: Exploring the Moderating
More informationDeception Detection Theory as a Basis for an Automated Investigation of the Behavior Analysis Interview
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) AMCIS 2009 Doctoral Consortium Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2009 Deception Detection Theory as a Basis for an Automated
More informationVideo killed the radio star? The influence of presentation modality on detecting high-stakes, emotional lies
1 Legal and Criminological Psychology (2014) 2014 The British Psychological Society www.wileyonlinelibrary.com Video killed the radio star? The influence of presentation modality on detecting high-stakes,
More informationthe Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law
Detecting Deception Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law Series Editors Graham M. Davies and Ray Bull University of Leicester, UK The Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing
More informationThe Effect of Cognitive Load on Deception
Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 10-2-2009 The Effect of Cognitive Load on Deception Terri Patterson Florida International
More informationCHAPTER CONTENTS. 41 A Test-Taking Analogy
CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 41 A Test-Taking Analogy 44 Explaining 54% Accuracy 45 Conventional Wisdom Regarding Reasons for Accuracy and Inaccuracy 45 The Psychometrics of Veracity Judgments 48 A Few
More informationBrain Fingerprinting Technology
Brain Fingerprinting Technology Anubha Saxena Ankit Kumar Mishra Department of Computer Science Poornima College of Engineering Jaipur, India Abstract Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the
More informationAPA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE (Effective October 10, 2017)
APA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE (Effective October 10, 2017) 1 Statement of Purpose: To promote the highest degree of decision accuracy in credibility assessment, the APA establishes for its membership the following
More informationUnicorns or Tiger Woods: Are Lie Detection Experts Myths or Rarities? A Response to On Lie Detection Wizards by Bond and Uysal
Law Hum Behav (2007) 31:117 123 DOI 10.1007/s10979-006-9058-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Unicorns or Tiger Woods: Are Lie Detection Experts Myths or Rarities? A Response to On Lie Detection Wizards by Bond and Uysal
More informationAPA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE (Effective September 1, 2015)
APA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE (Effective September 1, 2015) 1 Statement of Purpose: To promote the highest degree of decision accuracy in credibility assessment, the APA establishes for its membership the
More informationBook Note: In Doubt: The Psychology Of The Criminal Justice Process, by Dan Simon
Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 51, Issue 2 (Winter 2014) Article 13 Book Note: In Doubt: The Psychology Of The Criminal Justice Process, by Dan Simon Jennifer McKee Follow this and additional works at:
More informationContents. Part I: The Nature of the Phenomena 1. Preface. About the Authors
Contents Preface About the Authors xi xiii Part I: The Nature of the Phenomena 1 Chapter 1 Perspectives on Lying and Deception 3 Lying and Deception as Communication 6 Conceiving of Deceiving 10 Perceptions
More informationScoring Respiration When Using Directed Lie Comparison Questions
Honts & Handler Scoring Respiration When Using Directed Lie Comparison Questions Charles R. Honts and Mark Handler Abstract Recent research reports that respiration responses to directed lie comparison
More informationMY RIGHT I: DECEPTION DETECTION AND HEMISPHERIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-AWARENESS
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2003, 31(8), 767-772 Society for Personality Research (Inc.) MY RIGHT I: DECEPTION DETECTION AND HEMISPHERIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-AWARENESS SARAH MALCOLM AND JULIAN PAUL
More informationHow to Spot a Liar. Reading Practice
Reading Practice How to Spot a Liar However much we may abhor it, deception comes naturally to all living things. Birds do it by feigning injury to lead hungry predators away from nesting young. Spider
More informationFRYE The short opinion
FRYE The short opinion FRYE v. UNITED STATES 54 App. D. C. 46, 293 F. 1013 No. 3968 Court of Appeals of District of Columbia Submitted November 7, 1923 December 3, 1923, Decided Before SMYTH, Chief Justice,
More informationHIGH-STAKES, REAL-WORLD DECEPTION: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PROCESS OF DECEPTION AND DECEPTION DETECTION USING LINGUISTIC-BASED CUES CHRISTIE M.
HIGH-STAKES, REAL-WORLD DECEPTION: AN EAMINATION OF THE PROCESS OF DECEPTION AND DECEPTION DETECTION USING LINGUISTIC-BASED CUES By CHRISTIE M. FULLER Bachelor of Science Kansas State University Manhattan,
More informationTo cite this article, please use the following reference:
To cite this article, please use the following reference: Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R. M., & Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first
More informationInformation Gain of the Relevant-Irrelevant Test
Information Gain of the Relevant-Irrelevant Test Charles R. Honts 1 and Mark Handler 2 Abstract We adapted the Information Gain (IG) analysis procedures described by Honts and Schweinle (2009) to the Relevant
More informationThe Impact of Lie to Me on Viewers Actual Ability to Detect Deception
crx362686crx The Impact of Lie to Me on Viewers Actual Ability to Detect Deception Communication Research 37(6) 847 856 The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permission: http://www. sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav
More informationMohegan Sun Casino/Resort Uncasville, CT AAPP Annual Seminar
Mohegan Sun Casino/Resort Uncasville, CT 06382 2016 AAPP Annual Seminar Low Base Rate Screening Survival Analysis 1 & Successive Hurdles Mark Handler 2 AAPP Research & Information Chair Greetings my fellow
More informationContent in Context Improves Deception Detection Accuracy
Human Communication Research ISSN 0360-3989 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Content in Context Improves Deception Detection Accuracy J. Pete Blair 1, Timothy R. Levine 2, & Allison S. Shaw 2 1 Department of Criminal
More information1 Research on deception detection: past and present
Part 1 Introduction 1 Research on deception detection: past and present Pär Anders Granhag and Leif A. Strömwall Deception a central characteristic of human life To perceive, feel, and remember are all
More informationDeception Detection Expertise
Law Hum Behav (2008) 32:339 351 DOI 10.1007/s10979-007-9110-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Deception Detection Expertise Gary D. Bond Published online: 10 August 2007 Ó American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41
More informationCues to Catching Deception in Interviews: A Brief Overview
Cues to Catching Deception in Interviews: A Brief Overview November 2012 National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism Based at the University of Maryland 3300 Symons Hall College
More informationBeliefs of Forensic Investigators Regarding Bi- and Uni-directional Behavior Analysis
Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting Vol. 1, Issue 1 Beliefs of Forensic Investigators Regarding Bi- and Uni-directional Behavior Analysis Philip Beaulieu * Bi-directional behavior analysis is
More informationJames E. Driskell a a Florida Maxima Corporation, Winter Park, FL, USA. Available online: 27 Jun 2011
This article was downloaded by: [Jim Driskell] On: 12 July 2011, At: 14:07 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
More informationCognitive Strategies
Cognitive Strategies The current project seeks to examine verbal differences in the spoken language of liars and truth tellers in a naturalistic setting as well as to examine the effects of questioning
More informationWhy Do Lie-Catchers Fail? A Lens Model Meta-Analysis of Human Lie Judgments
Psychological Bulletin 2011 American Psychological Association 2011, Vol. 137, No. 4, 643 659 0033-2909/11/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0023589 Why Do Lie-Catchers Fail? A Lens Model Meta-Analysis of Human Lie
More informationSeptember 1991 American Psychologist Vol. 46, No. 9, Who Can Catch a Liar?
September 1991 American Psychologist Vol. 46, No. 9, 913-920 Who Can Catch a Liar? Paul Ekman University of California, San Francisco Maureen O'Sullivan University of San Francisco The ability to detect
More informationImprovement in Deception Detection under Stress. Mike R. J. van der Burgt. Accompanied by Anna E. van t Veer. Tilburg University
1 Improvement in Deception Detection under Stress Mike R. J. van der Burgt Accompanied by Anna E. van t Veer Tilburg University Abstract 2 In this study we investigated whether anticipatory stress enhances
More informationPsychological Science
Chapter 2 Psychological Science Psychologists aren t the only people who seek to understand human behavior and solve social problems. Philosophers, religious leaders, and politicians, among others, also
More informationBehavioural Indicators That Could Be Used To Detect Interviewee Deception In The Conduct Of Investigative Interviews
Behavioural Indicators That Could Be Used To Detect Interviewee Deception In The Conduct Of Investigative Interviews Presenter: Martin TAYLOR Position: Senior Legal Specialist Australian Criminal Intelligence
More informationUniversity of Portsmouth PORTSMOUTH Hants UNITED KINGDOM PO1 2UP
University of Portsmouth PORTSMOUTH Hants UNITED KINGDOM PO1 2UP This Article Mann, Samantha, Vrij, Aldert and Bull, R. (2004) Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal
More informationDetecting True Lies: Police Officers Ability to Detect Suspects Lies
Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright 2004 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2004, Vol. 89, No. 1, 137 149 0021-9010/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137 Detecting True Lies: Police
More informationA Validity Study of the Comparison Question Test Based on Internal Criterion in Field Paired Examinations 1
Ginton A Validity Study of the Comparison Question Test Based on Internal Criterion in Field Paired Examinations 1 Avital Ginton 2 Abstract An estimate of the validity of polygraph field examinations was
More informationBarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory. Resource Report. John Morris. Name: ID: Admin. Date: December 15, 2010 (Online) 17 Minutes 22 Seconds
BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory By Reuven Bar-On, Ph.D. Resource Report Name: ID: Admin. Date: Duration: John Morris December 15, 2010 (Online) 17 Minutes 22 Seconds Copyright 2002 Multi-Health Systems
More informationThe Science of Psychology. Chapter 1
The Science of Psychology Chapter 1 What Is Psychology? Scientific study of behavior and mental processes Critical Thinking Inductive Deductive Analytical Purposeful Open Authentic What is critical thinking?
More informationCAN THE UNCONSCIOUS BOOST LIE DETECTION ACCURACY? Chris N. H. Street 1. Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences,
CAN THE UNCONSCIOUS BOOST LIE DETECTION ACCURACY? Chris N. H. Street 1 Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK. International Research Centre for Investigative
More informationWiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security
Human Behavior and Deception Detection Mark G. Frank, University at Buffalo, State University of New York Maureen O Sullivan, University of San Francisco Melissa A. Menasco, University at Buffalo, State
More informationAn Evaluation of Interrater Reliability Measures on Binary Tasks Using d-prime
Article An Evaluation of Interrater Reliability Measures on Binary Tasks Using d-prime Applied Psychological Measurement 1 13 Ó The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav
More informationThe Art of Deception: Best Academic Techniques in Lie Detection
The Art of Deception: Best Academic Techniques in Lie Detection Reza Jelveh Hellenic American University Manchester, New Hampshire, USA Abstract Deception has nowadays become an intrinsic aspect of many
More informationEvaluating the Credibility Assessment Capability of Vocal Analysis Software
Evaluating the Credibility Assessment Capability of Vocal Analysis Software Aaron C. Elkins University of Arizona aelkins@cmi.arizona.edu ABSTRACT Vocal analysis software used for credibility assessment
More informationTRENDS IN LEGAL ADVOCACY: INTERVIEWS WITH LEADING PROSECUTORS AND DEFENCE LAWYERS ACROSS THE GLOBE
TRENDS IN LEGAL ADVOCACY: INTERVIEWS WITH LEADING PROSECUTORS AND DEFENCE LAWYERS ACROSS THE GLOBE Instructions to Interviewers Each interview with a prosecutor or defence lawyer will comprise a book chapter
More informationIn review. Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) cannot distinguish between truthful and fabricated accounts of a negative event
Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) cannot distinguish between truthful and fabricated accounts of a negative event Glynis Bogaard 1*, Ewout H. Meijer 1, Aldert Vrij 2, Harald Merckelbach 1 1 Maastricht
More informationInvestigation. Part Three: Interrogation
Investigation Part Three: Interrogation Lie Detection The Polygraph The Relevant-Irrelevant Test The Control Question Test Positive Control Test The Guilty Knowledge Test Weaknesses of the Polygraph Unable
More informationAssessing credibility
Assessing credibility Judgecraft across Europe Omsenie, Slovakia 12 October 2015 John Phillips Outline What is credibility? What research is there and what are its limitations? What are the non-verbal
More informationEvaluating Truthfulness and Detecting Deception By DAVID MATSUMOTO, Ph.D., HYI SUNG HWANG, Ph.D., LISA SKINNER, J.D., and MARK FRANK, Ph.D.
Evaluating Truthfulness and Detecting Deception By DAVID MATSUMOTO, Ph.D., HYI SUNG HWANG, Ph.D., LISA SKINNER, J.D., and MARK FRANK, Ph.D. Contents blurb: Text blurbs: By recognizing certain clues, investigators
More informationDescription and explanation of the major themes of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the other people, dealing with new environments, and making
How To Analyze People: Reading People, Body Language, Recognizing Emotions & Facial Expressions (Analyzing People, Body Language Books, How To Read Lies, Reading Facial Expressions) By Bradley Fairbanks
More informationInsight Assessment Measuring Thinking Worldwide
California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST). The CCTST measures the reasoning skills human beings use in the process of reflectively deciding what to believe or what to do. Skill/Attribute Name SE
More informationAutomated Determination of the Veracity of Interview Statements from People of Interest to an Operational Security Force
Automated Determination of the Veracity of Interview Statements from People of Interest to an Operational Security Force Douglas P. Twitchell Illinois State University dtwitch@ilstu.edu David P. Biros
More informationCommentary: Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All? Chris N. H. Street 1,2 Miguel A. Vadillo 3. University of Huddersfield, UK.
Commentary: Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All? Chris N. H. Street 1,2 Miguel A. Vadillo 3 1 Department of Psychology, University of Huddersfield, UK. 2 International Research Centre for Investigative
More informationKnowledge Sourcing and Knowledge Consumption in Computer- Mediated Complex Decision Making
Knowledge Sourcing and Knowledge Consumption in Computer- Mediated Complex Decision Making Nathan W. Twyman Jeffrey L. Jenkins Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. Katherine Carl University of Arizona University of Arizona
More informationInformation-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents experiences
Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 589 599 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents experiences Aldert Vrij
More informationEfficacy of Modified Cognitive Interviewing, Compared to Human Judgments in Detecting Deception Related to Bio-threat Activities
Volume 6 Number 3 Volume 6, No. 3: Fall 2013 Journal of Strategic Security Article 9 Efficacy of Modified Cognitive Interviewing, Compared to Human Judgments in Detecting Deception Related to Bio-threat
More informationTech Talk: Using the Lafayette ESS Report Generator
Raymond Nelson Included in LXSoftware is a fully featured manual score sheet that can be used with any validated comparison question test format. Included in the manual score sheet utility of LXSoftware
More informationSocial and Pragmatic Language in Autistic Children
Parkland College A with Honors Projects Honors Program 2015 Social and Pragmatic Language in Autistic Children Hannah Li Parkland College Recommended Citation Li, Hannah, "Social and Pragmatic Language
More informationDetecting Deception in Client Inquiries: A Review and Implications for. Future Research
Detecting Deception in Client Inquiries: A Review and Implications for Future Research D. Kip Holderness Jr. * I. INTRODUCTION Client inquiries provide a wealth of information to auditors throughout the
More informationCHAPTER 26 26POLYGRAPH TEST
26POLYGRAPH TEST Forensic psychologists interpret and evaluate the internal and external behavioral patterns of suspects/accused/witnesses/victims with the help of different equipments and aid in the process
More informationExploring liars strategies for creating deceptive reports
1 Legal and Criminological Psychology (2012) C 2012 The British Psychological Society The British Psychological Society www.wileyonlinelibrary.com Exploring liars strategies for creating deceptive reports
More informationC. Identify gender differences in communication. 9. Men and women communicate in different ways, primarily because of socialization and status.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN EXPERIENTIAL APPROACH EIGHTH EDITION Joyce S. Osland PART 2 CREATING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS Chapter 8 Interpersonal Communication OBJECTIVES: A. Understand the transactional
More informationForensic Science. Read the following passage about how forensic science is used to solve crimes. Then answer the questions based on the text.
Read the following passage about how forensic science is used to solve crimes. Then answer the questions based on the text. Forensic Science by Andrea Campbell 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Today, more than a century
More informationDeception Detection Accuracy is a Predictable Linear Function of Message Veracity Base-Rate: A Formal Test of Park and Levine s Probability Model
Communication Monographs Vol. 73, No. 3, September 2006, pp. 243260 Deception Detection Accuracy is a Predictable Linear Function of Message Veracity Base-Rate: A Formal Test of Park and Levine s Probability
More informationThe behavioural analysis interview: clarifying the practice, theory and understanding of its use and effectiveness
International Journal of Police Science & Management Volume 10 Number 1 The behavioural analysis interview: clarifying the practice, theory and understanding of its use and effectiveness Frank Horvath,
More informationRESEARCH ARTICLE A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading
Psychology, Crime & Law Vol. 14, No. 3, June 2008, 189200 RESEARCH ARTICLE A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading Pär Anders Granhag a * and
More informationThe truth about lying
Reading Practice The truth about lying Over the years Richard Wiseman has tried to unravel the truth about deception - investigating the signs that give away a liar. A In the 1970s, as part of a large-scale
More informationMODEL POLICY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT/PUBLIC-SERVICE PRE- EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH SCREENING EXAMINATIONS. 1. Introduction Evidence-based Approach...
AMERICAN POLYGRAPH ASSOCIATION (APA) MODEL POLICY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT/PUBLIC-SERVICE PRE- EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH SCREENING EXAMINATIONS Table of Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. Evidence-based Approach...2
More informationPeople with Power are Better Liars
People with Power are Better Liars Dana R. Carney, Andy J. Yap, Brian J. Lucas, & Pranjal H. Mehta Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 People lie frequently
More informationBRAIN FINGERPRINTING
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING 1 ASHWINI V. SHARMA, 1 Dr. GANESH S. SABLE 1, 2 Department of Electronics Engineering, Savitribai Phule Womens Engg. college, B.A.M.U. University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. ashwinisharma.108@gmail.com,
More informationLies, Damn Lies, and Expectations: How Base Rates Inform Lie Truth Judgments
Applied Cognitive Psychology, Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 29: 149 155 (2015) Published online 15 October 2014 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.3085 Lies, Damn Lies, and Expectations:
More informationAn Empirical Test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview
Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 30, No. 3, June 2006 ( C 2006) DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9014-3 An Empirical Test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview Aldert Vrij, 1,3 Samantha Mann, 1 and Ronald P. Fisher 2
More informationInvestigative Interviewing 1 PSY 4931
Investigative Interviewing 1 Psychology & Law PSY 4931 Christine Ruva, Ph.D. INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEWING & FALSE CONFESSIONS The Initial Investigative Interview Benefits of Conducting Interview in Close
More informationCHAPTER 1. Introduction MYTHS IN DECEPTION
CHAPTER 1 Introduction MYTHS IN DECEPTION Everybody knows what it is to lie, and this familiarity with lying surely makes us knowledgeable about deception. 1 For example, we all know that lying is undesirable.
More information