Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)
|
|
- Walter Rose
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of PAUL W. REIDL (State Bar No. ) Law Office of Paul W. Reidl Eagle Trace Drive Half Moon Bay, CA 0 Telephone: (0) paul@reidllaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs The Wine Group and Maison des Futailles UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Sacramento Division) 0 THE WINE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and MAISON DES FUTAILLES, S.E.C., d/b/a Kruger Wines and Spirits, a Quebec Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 0 MARTITA S MIXERS, LLC, a Wisconsin Limited Liability Corporation, Defendant. Plaintiffs The Wine Group, LLC and Maison des Futailles, S.E.C. ( Plaintiffs ) for their Complaint against Defendant Martita s Mixers, LLC, alleges the following on information and belief: // // Page
2 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This is an action for declaratory relief under the Lanham Act, U.S. C. 0 et seq., and the Declaratory Judgment Act, U.S.C. 0 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C., (a) and 0 (a), and U.S.C.. Acts giving rise to the claims asserted herein have been expressly aimed at, have occurred in, and will continue to occur in California and this District.. Venue properly lies within this District pursuant to U.S.C. and in this Court because The Wine Group s principal place of business is in San Joaquin County. THE PARTIES. Plaintiff The Wine Group, LLC. ( TWG ) is in the business of producing and distributing wines and spirits internationally, in the United States, California and this District. It is the exclusive United States importer of LULU B. spirits. It imports these products through its Underdog Wine & Spirits division in Ripon, California.. Plaintiff Maison des Futailles, S.E.C., is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the Province of Quebec, Canada. It produces wines and spirits in Canada and exports them to the United States under the d/b/a Kruger Wines and Spirits ( Kruger ). It does not have any offices in the United States.. Defendant Martita s Mixers LLC ( Martita s ) is a Wisconsin Limited Liability Corporation. It is in the business of marketing and selling non-alcoholic beverages in the United States, California and this District. FACTUAL BACKGROUND. Kruger sells LULU B. wines. These are bottled and distributed in the United States by TWG. LULU B. wines have been sold continuously in the United States since 00. Page
3 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0. In early 0, TWG began distributing LULU B. spirit-based drinks made by Kruger and labeled as LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS. These are lower calorie, lower carbohydrate drinks flavored to taste like cocktails such as mojito, cranberry cosmopolitan and chocolate martini. These have received critical acclaim and their sales and distribution are growing rapidly.. The front labels of the LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS contain the phrase A Guiltless Indulgence, READY TO SERVE. This phrase is used on the label to communicate to consumers that the cocktails can be consumed without feeling guilty about the number of calories or carbohydrates contained in the product. This messaging is reinforced by text contained on the back label. The cocktails are packaged in a distinctively-shaped frosted glass bottle. The LULU B. packaging and labels are depicted below: 0. Lower calorie and lower carbohydrate products have been marketed for many years in the United States. These have frequently been marketed by suggesting that the consumer can consume them without the guilt associated with consuming a higher calorie, higher carbohydrate product. Although non-alcohol beverages have for many years been marketed in this manner, this Page
4 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 has only recently occurred in the alcohol beverage sector. LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS is one such entrant in this new category.. Martita s produces and distributes a non-alcoholic beverage called MARTITA S GUILTLESS or MARTITA S MIXERS. This product is made in Wisconsin and sold in Wisconsin and elsewhere, including into this District. One of the ways that Martita s markets its beverages is by using the services of the social networking site known as Facebook located in Palo Alto, California. Martita s has created its own advertising page for the brand which provides a platform for marketing communications directly with and from consumers. Defendants Facebook page may be friended by anyone including friends from California and this District, and it has nearly 00 such friends. The Facebook page links to the web site through which consumers throughout the country can purchase MARTITA S GUILTLESS beverages. Martita s also posts promotional videos on which is owned by Google, Inc. in Mountain View, California. These promotional videos can be viewed by anyone in California and this District. 0. Martita s has registered the term GUILTLESS as a trademark (No.,,) in Class for Non-alcoholic cocktail mixes and bases to be used in conjunction with alcohol to create alcoholic beverages, including margaritas, mojitos, and cosmopolitans. Martita s has applied to register a GUILTLESS trademark (No. /0) in Class for wine coolers.. At the time that Martita s filed the application to register the GUILTLESS trademark in Class, it had done nothing in furtherance of using the mark on wine coolers. It did not have the resources or contacts to make wine coolers. It did not know anyone who could make wine coolers for it. It was not licensed to make or distribute wine coolers and had done nothing in furtherance of obtaining such licenses. It had taken no steps to contact any distributors of alcohol beverages to see if they had any interest in distributing wine coolers. It does not use this mark on alcohol beverages. Page
5 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of. The packaging for MARTITA S GUILTLESS non-alcoholic beverages is depicted below: 0 0. By letter dated May, 0 ( Demand Letter ) sent to TWG, Maison des Futailles, and others, trademark litigation counsel for Martita s charged that by using the phrase A Guiltless Indulgence, READY TO SERVE on its label the LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS infringed on Martita s rights in its GUILTLESS trademark for non-alcohol beverages. Page The Demand Letter asserted that there was a likelihood of confusion, namely, that consumers would mistakenly believe that the LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAIL mixed drinks are made or licensed by Martita s. The demand letter also charged that by using guiltless on its label the origin of the product was falsely designated and that Plaintiffs were engaging in unfair competition under the Lanham Act.. The Demand Letter demanded that Plaintiffs immediately: (a) cease using the term guiltless in their businesses, (b) agree not to use any word similar to guiltless in their businesses,
6 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 and (c) agree not to challenge Martita s exclusive rights to use guiltless in connection with alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. The Demand Letter threatened to seek legal action under state and federal law if plaintiffs failed to capitulate promptly to these demands.. By sending the Demand Letter to TWG, Defendants deliberately targeted TWG and its valuable LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS franchise because it believed that it may not be able to obtain Federal Court jurisdiction over Maison des Futailles. It understood from the label of the LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS that TWG s Underdog Wines was the importer and distributor of the product and that it was located in Ripon, California. It was aware of the great value of this brand to TWG as its importer and distributor in the United States and it specifically targeted TWG with the intention of destroying the ability of TWG to use and distribute the LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS in its current package and to eliminate its ability to use a common English language term, guiltless, in any manner whatsoever even on products not associated in any way with LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS. The whole point of sending the Demand Letter to TWG was to establish a claim against a company located in the United States and causing great harm, injury and damage to TWG and its valuable franchise in the process. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF). Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the allegations of paragraphs through as though fully set forth herein.. An actual controversy exists between Plaintiffs and Martita s that is within the Court s power to determine pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, U.S.C //. Martita s asserts as follows: Page
7 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of (a) It has protectable and valid rights in GUILTLESS for the specified non-alcoholic beverages in Class ; and (b) That by using A Guiltless Indulgence, READY TO SERVE on its labels consumers of LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS will mistakenly believe that product originates from, is sponsored by or is affiliated with MARTITA S GUILTLESS non-alcoholic beverages thus violating the Lanham Act and state law; and (c) That by using A Guiltless Indulgence, READY TO SERVE on its labels Plaintiffs LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS competes unfairly with the MARTITA S GUILTLESS nonalcoholic beverages thus violating the Lanham Act and state law; and 0 (d) That by using A Guiltless Indulgence, READY TO SERVE on its labels the origin of Plaintiffs LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS is falsely designated thus violating the Lanham Act and state law.. Plaintiffs assert as follows: (a) Martita s trademark application no. /0 for wine coolers is void ab initio because Martita s did not have a bona fide intention to use the applied-for mark on wine coolers as of the date the application was filed; and (b) Plaintiffs sales of LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS does not create a likelihood of confusion as to source, sponsorship or affiliation with MARTITA S GUILTLESS non-alcoholic beverages because, among other reasons, the marks, the packaging and the goods are dissimilar; and, 0 (c) Plaintiffs LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS are not falsely designated as to their origin because, among other reasons, the use of term guiltless is not a unique identifier for Martita s and there is no likelihood that consumers will believe that Plaintiffs mixed drinks originate from Martita s solely due to the use of the term guiltless on the label; and Page
8 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of (d) Plaintiffs LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS do not compete unfairly with MARTITA S GUILTLESS non-alcoholic beverages because, among other reasons, they do not compete at all; and (e) Plaintiffs use of the term guiltless on the labels of LULU B. FABULOUS 0 COCKTAILS is not being used as a trademark but is being used fairly to describe a characteristic or quality of the goods and is therefore a fair use under U.S.C. (b)() and the First Amendment for which Plaintiffs cannot be held liable. 0. This Court s determination of the issues presented by the actual controversy between Plaintiffs and Martita s will afford relief from the uncertainty, insecurity and controversy with respect to the rights, status and legal relations between the parties. A declaration of the parties respective rights will settle the conflicting and disputed claims of the parties, will afford them the security of knowing precisely what their respective rights are, and will prevent a multiplicity of actions that will arise if the parties continue on their present course of action without a judgment from this Court. Declaratory relief is equitable, necessary and proper under the circumstances presented by this case. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment against Martita s as follows:. Declaring that: (a) (b) Martita s trademark application no. /0 is void ab initio; and Plaintiffs sale of LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS does not create a likelihood of 0 confusion as to source, sponsorship or affiliation with MARTITA S GUILTLESS non-alcoholic beverages and otherwise does not violate any federal or state law; and (c) Plaintiffs LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS are not falsely designated as to origin and otherwise do not violate any federal or state law; and Page
9 Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of (d) Plaintiffs are not engaging in unfair competition under federal or state law by using 0 the term guiltless on the labels of their LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS; and (e) The use by Plaintiffs of the term guiltless on the labels of their LULU B. FABULOUS COCKTAILS is a fair, non-trademark use for which they cannot be held liable under the Lanham Act and the First Amendment.. Granting such other and further relief to Plaintiffs as may be just and proper under the circumstances, including but not limited to costs of suit. LAW OFFICE OF PAUL W. REIDL By: _ 0 Dated: July, 0 Paul W. Reidl (CA Bar No. ) LAW OFFICE OF PAUL W. REIDL Eagle Trace Drive Half Moon Bay, California 0 Telephone: (0) 0-0 paul@reidllaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs The Wine Group and Maison des Futailles, S.A.I.C. Page
Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 ANDREA SCHMITT, on her own behalf, and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ULTRATEC, INC. and CAPTEL, INC., v. Plaintiffs, SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and CAPTIONCALL, LLC, Defendants. Civil Action No.: 14-cv-66
More informationCase 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 1:17-cv-00939 ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC, Plaintiff, v. No. MICHIGAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
More informationCase 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1
Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 John E. Flaherty Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-4096
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case :-cv-00-spl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Daniel L. Miranda, Esq. SBN 0 MIRANDA LAW FIRM E. Ray Road, Suite #0 Gilbert, AZ Tel: (0) - dan@mirandalawpc.com Robert Tauler, Esq. SBN, (pro hac vice forthcoming)
More informationPlaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION
JEFFERSON COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF COLORADO Address: 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 Telephone: (303) 271-6145 Plaintiff: COMFORT DENTAL GROUP, INC., a Colorado Corporation,
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 E.S., by and through her parents, R.S. and J.S., and JODI STERNOFF, both on their own
More informationCase 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:15-cv-00270-RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00270 GEORGE BACA, v. Plaintiff, PARKVIEW
More informationCase 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00140-ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Case 4:08-cv-01915-TCM Document 48 Filed 04/28/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Cause No.: 4:08-cv-1915 ) WALGREEN
More informationCase 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:19-cv-00567-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CAREDX, INC. and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.
Civil Action No: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION a Colorado Corporation Plaintiff, v. PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC., a Colorado Corporation Defendant.
More informationCase 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246
Case 2:15-cv-08180-SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246 Elvin Esteves Charles H. Chevalier J. Brugh Lower GIBBONS P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102 Tel: (973) 596-4500
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-djh Document Filed // Page of 0 FREDENBERG BEAMS Daniel E. Fredenberg 00 Christian C. M. Beams 0 N. th Street, Suite 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: 0/- Email: dfredenberg@fblegalgroup.com
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-00289-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SCOTT RODRIGUES ) Plaintiff ) C.A. 07-10104-GAO ) v. ) ) THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC ) Defendant ) AMENDED COMPLAINT and jury trial demand Introduction
More informationJudicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo
From the SelectedWorks of haitham atiyah Spring April 10, 2016 Judicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo haitham atiyah Available at: https://works.bepress.com/haitham_atiyah/3/
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. MOHAMED BASEL ASWAD, M.D., Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. 21 U.S.C. 331(a and 333(a(1: Introduction
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
DR. DAVID D. D ALISE, DDS, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION v. Plaintiff, STRAUMANN USA, LLC, STRAUMANN MANUFACTURING, INC., and STRAUMANN HOLDING
More informationRe: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing for its Men s Multis for prevention of cancer
June 18, 2009 VIA REGULAR MAIL AND FAX TO 973-254-4853 Gary S. Balkema, President Consumer Care Division Bayer HealthCare LLC 36 Columbia Rd Morristown, NJ 07962-1910 Re: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 199-mc-09999 Document 654 Filed 11/09/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID # 61421 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMA
More informationAssociates, llc, for its Complaint against the defendants, Gary K. DeJohn, Sr. and DeJohn
DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521 DATE FILED: November 10, 2017 12:55 PM FILING ID: FF4949B297BB2 (970) 494-3500 CASE NUMBER: 2017CV30947 Plaintiff:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and
FILED FEB PM 1: 1 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --0-1 SEA SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY TAMMIE AUST, an individual; ALISON GRENNAN, an individual; JENNIFER
More informationCase 1:09-cv WWC -MCC Document 607 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:09-cv-01685-WWC -MCC Document 607 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC., : Plaintiff : v. CIVIL NO.
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:14-cv-02873 Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TROYLYNN MORRIS CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF Q. B. SECTION:
More informationCase 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V., and C.P. PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:14-cv-08005 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/14/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SEAN PORTER, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA SYKES and SETH SYKES, : CIVIL ACTION Individually and as Parents and Natural : Guardians of WESLEY ALEXANDER : NO. SYKES,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. UCB, INC., Defendant. VIOLATION 21 U.S.C. 331(k), 352(f)(1), and 333(a)(1) (Causing drugs to be
More informationMOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Express Scripts, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MISSION HOSPITAL, INC., Defendant. Civil Action
More informationUPDATES TO CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 GUIDELINES
UPDATES TO CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 GUIDELINES Compliance with California s Proposition 65 is a longstanding issue for fishing tackle manufacturers, distributors and retailers. However, 2016 regulatory
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 CARPENTER LAW GROUP Todd D. Carpenter (CA ) 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, California 0 Telephone:.. Facsimile:.. todd@carpenterlawyers.com PATTERSON
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No.: COMPLAINT
Case: 3:11-cv-00622 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/08/11 Page 1 of 10 K.J., a minor, by and through her mother CARAN BRAUN, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN vs. Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-1322 COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
1 1 1 1 John B. Sganga, Jr. (SBN 1,1 john.sganga@knobbe.com Sheila N. Swaroop (SBN, sheila.swaroop@knobbe.com Baraa Kahf (SBN 1,1 baraa.kahf@knobbe.com Marissa Calcagno (SBN, marissa.calcagno@knobbe.com
More informationCase 2:12-cv LRH-GWF Document 1 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 26
Case :-cv-0-lrh-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of South th Street Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 0 Tel: (0) - Fax: (0) - 0 COMP PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 00 S. Fourth Street, Second Floor Las
More informationCase 1:15-cv ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendant. COMPLAINT
Case 1:15-cv-05526-ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 3:14-cv JM-WVG Document 1 Filed 11/03/14 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jm-wvg Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 0 CARPENTER LAW GROUP Todd D. Carpenter (CA ) 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, California 0 Telephone:.. Facsimile:.. todd@carpenterlawyers.com PATTERSON
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-01011-UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ONYX THERAPEUTICS, INC., v. Plaintiff, DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES,
More information4:18-cv AMQ Date Filed 07/17/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 21
4:18-cv-01963-AMQ Date Filed 07/17/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 21 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Scott Vanderstelt and Vandy Vanderstelt, on behalf
More informationState of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education
State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education Introduction Steps to Protect a Child s Right to Special Education: Procedural
More informationUnited States District Court
Case :-cv-0-wha Document Filed 0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 SHANA BECERRA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Scott D. Eads, OSB #910400 Email: seads@schwabe.com Nicholas F. Aldrich, Jr., OSB #160306 Email: naldrich@schwabe.com Facsimile: 503.796.2900 Attorneys for Plaintiff AgaMatrix, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:12-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:12-cv-02718-RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION MICHELLE NEMPHOS AS Legal Guardian for C.G.N. A Minor under
More informationCase 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21
Case 5:15-cv-00510 Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION MISSION PHARMACAL COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. Case No.
More informationCase: 3:17-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Case: 3:17-cv-00823-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CONSUELA SMITH-WILLIAMS, FRED RIVERS, RICHARD MURPHY, ROBERT RISTOW, ROGER
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:18-cv-00863 Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23 LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC C.K. Lee (CL 4086) Anne Seelig (AS 3976) 30 East 39th Street, Second Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel.: 212-465-1188 Fax:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:
Case :-cv-00-ben-ksc Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 THE LAW OFFICE OF PAUL K. JOSEPH, PC PAUL K. JOSEPH (SBN 0) paul@pauljosephlaw.com W. Pt. Loma Blvd., No. 0 San Diego, CA 0 Phone: () -0 Fax:
More informationORDINANCE NO. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO TOBACCO
ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO TOBACCO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. Section
More informationApplication for Alcohol Sale/Service on Public Property
Application for Alcohol Sale/Service on Public Property Thank you for choosing Bartlesville s Parks for your event. We welcome activities for our residents and visitors. To assist us in making your event
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION
WHITE O'CONNOR CURRY GATTI & AVANZADO LLP Andrew M. White (State Bar No. 60181) Melvin N.A. Avanzado (State Bar No. 137127) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Twenty-Third Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4008
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/06/18 Page 1 of 36
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Joel D. Smith (State Bar No. 0) Yeremey Krivoshey (State Bar No. 0) 0 North California Boulevard, Suite
More informationPermitted Cannabis Marketing Activities
CMAadvocacy.ca CMA Guide: Permitted Cannabis Marketing Activities This document provides general information. It does not constitute legal advice. Those with specific questions about the legislation and
More informationIf you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )
LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE CO. for TRANSCRANIAL
More informationALCOHOL POLICY FOR GRADUATE STUDENT EVENTS
ALCOHOL POLICY FOR GRADUATE STUDENT EVENTS POLICY STATEMENT Yeshiva University is committed to creating and maintaining an environment that is free of alcohol abuse. The University expects that the consumption
More information2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:12-cv-13397-VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 CLAUDIA D. ORR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN vs. Plaintiff, SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Case No. Hon. Defendant. /
More informationOrdinance amending the Health Code to prohibit tobacco retailers from selling flavored
FILE NO. ORDINANCE NO. 1 [Health Code - Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products] Ordinance amending the Health Code to prohibit tobacco retailers from selling flavored tobacco products, including
More informationIt is illegal to serve more than 40 oz of beer, 1 liter of wine or 4 oz distilled spirits at one time to a guest.
It is illegal to serve more than 40 oz of beer, 1 liter of wine or 4 oz distilled spirits at one time to a guest. DAYS AND HOURS OF SALE AND CONSUMPTION. Alcohol may be sold in an
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. COME NOW Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys of record J.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 1 1 1 1 1 1 WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, a Washington corporation, JOSEPH O. GEHRETT, JR. M.D., BARBARA K. GEHRETT, M.D., MICHAEL J. KELLY,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
DENTSPLY SIRONA INC. and TULSA DENTAL PRODUCTS LLC d/b/a DENTSPLY SIRONA ENDODONTICS, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO V. EDGE ENDO, LLC, 1:17-cv-1041 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
More informationINCORPORATED COUNTY OF LOS ALAMOS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE GUIDELINE
INCORPORATED COUNTY OF LOS ALAMOS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE GUIDELINE Index No. 1736 Effective: July 1, 2000 Revised: August 20, 2014 I. Purpose SALE, SERVICE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT COUNTY
More informationBritish American Tobacco Snus Marketing Standards
British American Tobacco Snus Marketing Standards British American Tobacco p.l.c. believes there is sufficient scientific evidence to support a less restrictive regime for the advertising and promotion
More informationIs POM Wonderful Really Wonderful? How the FTC, the FDA and Private Litigation Address Deceptive Food Advertising
Is POM Wonderful Really Wonderful? How the FTC, the FDA and Private Litigation Address Deceptive Food Advertising Dee Pridgen October 9, 2014 14 th Consumer Issues Conference Pom Wonderful achieve immortality?
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY Division of Gaming Enforcement CASINO HOTEL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MERCHANDISING PERMIT APPLICATION
STATE OF NEW JERSEY Division of Gaming Enforcement CASINO HOTEL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MERCHANDISING PERMIT APPLICATION STATE OF NEW JERSEY Division of Gaming Enforcement MERCHANDISING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ABBVIE INC. and ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY LTD, v. Plaintiffs, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHANNON MAHONEY, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly CASE NO. 15 Civ. 9841 situated, Plaintiff, v. CLASS ACTION ENDO
More informationMUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE
O-17-23 05/17/17 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, CHAPTER 6, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BE IT ORDAINED, by
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationGrievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018
Grievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Grievance Procedure ( Procedure ) is to implement a system by which the Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County
More informationAFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT
AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT This AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between FACULTY PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF LLUSM dba LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY FACULTY MEDICAL
More informationPermitted Cannabis Marketing Activities
CMAadvocacy.ca CMA Guide: Permitted Cannabis Marketing Activities This document provides general information. It does not constitute legal advice. Those with specific questions about the legislation and
More informationCase3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 21
Case:-cv-00-JCS Document Filed0// Page of 0 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. ELAINE A. RYAN (To be Admitted Pro Hac Vice) PATRICIA N. SYVERSON (CA SBN 0) LINDSEY M. GOMEZ-GRAY (To be Admitted
More informationThese Rules of Membership apply in respect of all Products purchased by a Member from Sigma (and any Program Partner) on or after 1 February 2017.
Rules of Membership 1. Introduction These Rules of Membership apply in respect of all Products purchased by a Member from Sigma (and any Program Partner) on or after 1 February 2017. The previously published
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al Doc. 251 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ALLERGAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-rgk-sh Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 Rosemary Rivas (State Bar. No. 0) rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California
More informationeffect that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act ( FSPTCA ), which was
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SMOKING EVERYWHERE, INC., Plaintiff, and Civ. No. 09-cv-0771 (RJL SOTTERA, INC., d/b/a NJOY, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,
More informationCHAPTER 120: TOBACCO
CHAPTER 120: TOBACCO Section 120.01 Definitions 120.02 Jurisdiction 120.03 Prohibitions on sale or distribution of tobacco products 120.04 Licensing of tobacco products retailers 120.99 Penalty 120.01
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:17-cv-03314 Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24 LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC C.K. Lee (CL 4086) Anne Seelig (AS 3976) 30 East 39th Street, Second Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel.: 212-465-1188 Fax:
More informationCase 1:14-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00895-JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 1220 L Street NW, Suite 300 Washington,
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
NON-PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION FOR LISTING ON OREGON DIRECTORY GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS Who is required to file this Certification? Any tobacco product manufacturer who is a non-participating
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. ( OAI ) answers and asserts its affirmative
FILED JUN 01 PM :1 The Honorable Ronald Kessler KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --0- SEA 1 1 THERESA BIGLER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Bigler,
More informationPresentation: Philip G. Hampton, II Haynes and Boone, LLP (202) September 14, 2017
Presentation: Philip G. Hampton, II Haynes and Boone, LLP (202) 654-4533 September 14, 2017 What is a Trademark? A trademark is any word, product name, symbol or device that identifies the goods or services
More information(4) Be as detailed as necessary to provide history of work performed; and:
www.omarfigueroa.com Page 66 of 278 (4) Be as detailed as necessary to provide history of work performed; and: (A) Include information adequate to identify any associated manufacturing facility (e.g.,
More informationDELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. A Service Sorority
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. A Service Sorority ALCOHOL AND ILLEGAL DRUG USAGE POLICY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated ( Delta ) is revising its alcohol and drug policy to
More information2014 UPDATED YOLO COUNTY CODE. Title 8 LAND DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 6: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL ORDINANCE
2014 UPDATED YOLO COUNTY CODE Title 8 LAND DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 6: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL ORDINANCE Sec. 8-6.101 Purpose The purpose of this Section is to establish permit requirement and development
More informationMETROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE
METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE Overview The Metrolinx Act, 2006, gives Metrolinx ( Metrolinx ) the authority to establish a system of administrative fees to ensure
More informationIC Chapter 10. Unlawful Sales
IC 7.1-5-10 Chapter 10. Unlawful Sales IC 7.1-5-10-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The addition of section 15.5 of this chapter by P.L.80-1986 does not apply to actions accruing
More informationLIFEPROOF LIMITED WARRANTY TOTAL WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM TERMS AND CONDITIONS
LIFEPROOF LIMITED WARRANTY TOTAL WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM TERMS AND CONDITIONS Otter Products, LLC, doing business as LifeProof, and its affiliated companies worldwide (collectively, LifeProof ) warrants
More informationDecember 17, 2007 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY & FAX TO
December 17, 2007 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY & FAX TO 630-598-8663 Ms. Brenda C. Barnes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Sara Lee Corporation 3500 Lacey Road Downers Grove IL 60515-5424 Dear Chairman Barnes:
More informationCITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.2 AGENDA TITLE: Provide Direction on ABC Liquor License Condition Change to Allow the Sale of Beer and Malt products at the Walmart Store
More informationFILED STATE OF CALIFORNIA - MEDICAL"BOARD OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO /JtJIJtl?J/xr 2" 20.JL BY I< /krjr!!j ANALYST
3 6 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General cif California JANE ZACK SIMON Supervising Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 66 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 000 San Francisco, CA 90-700 Telephone: () 0-3 Fac;simile:
More informationCSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees
CSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees The CSA and University of Guelph undergraduate students have been members of the Canadian
More informationCALIFORNIA'S NEW CLEAR AND REASONABLE PROPOSITION 65 WARNING REGULATIONS Carol Brophy, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP
Carol Brophy 415 365 6724 cbrophy@steptoe.com One Market Street Steuart Tower 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415 365 6700 main www.steptoe.com CALIFORNIA'S NEW CLEAR AND REASONABLE PROPOSITION 65 WARNING
More informationAfter the FDA Tobacco Control Law: Which Policies Are Legal To Pursue?
After the FDA Tobacco Control Law: Which Policies Are Legal To Pursue? October 2009 (Updated July 2010) The passage of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the 2009 FDA Law ) makes it
More information2017 Certificate Application This application will be accepted through Dec. 31, Fee: $150
Dental Assisting National Board, Inc. 2017 Certificate Application This application will be accepted through Dec. 31, 2017. Fee: $150 Measuring Dental Assisting Excellence Oregon Expanded Functions Orthodontic
More informationPOLICY STATEMENT 78 Serving, Possessing, and Consuming of Alcoholic Beverages
POLICY STATEMENT 78 Serving, Possessing, and Consuming of Alcoholic Beverages POLICY DIGEST Monitoring Unit: Office of Academic Affairs Initially Issued: August 15, 2005 Last Revised: July 10, 2018 I.
More informationState Office of Administrative Hearings '' Cathleen Parsley )> Chief Administrative Law Judge. April II, 2011
State Office of Administrative Hearings ''... - -- N 0... 0...... o w N ṃ... Cathleen Parsley )> "0 Chief Administrative Law Judge c a z c 3 IJ April II, 2011 (D :-! w Ul Alan Steen Administrator Texas
More informationORDINANCE RECITALS
ORDINANCE 2016- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS AMENDING CHAPTER 47, CHAPTER 50, CHAPTER 106.42 AND CHAPTER 106.80 OF THE CITRUS HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DELIVERIES
More informationAdvertising: The Federal Trade Commission and Private Rights of Action Venable LLP
Advertising: The Federal Trade Commission and Private Rights of Action 2012 Venable LLP 1 Agenda FTC s Role and Authority Claim Substantiation Private Rights of Action 2 FTC s Role and Authority FTC Authority
More information51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013
SENATE BILL ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 0 INTRODUCED BY Peter Wirth 0 AN ACT RELATING TO COMMERCE; AMENDING AND ENACTING SECTIONS OF THE NEW MEXICO FOOD ACT AND THE COMMERCIAL
More information