Scientific Misconduct September 15, Presented by May Al Kassar
|
|
- Lawrence Adams
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Research Non-Compliance & Scientific Misconduct September 15, 2010 Presented by May Al Kassar
2 Responsible Research Conduct The ethical conduct of research is a shared responsibility among: The institution Agencies sponsoring research Investigators The research teams IRB members and staff
3 Role Of the IRB The IRB is the administrative body responsible for assuring that all parties involved in human subjects research activities are guided by the principles of the Belmont Report.
4 Definition of Non-Compliance Noncompliance: Any failure to follow: (a) (b) (c) (d) Provisions of an IRB-approved research study Institutional policies Local laws or federal laws (for federally-sponsored research) The requirements and determinations of the IRB Noncompliance can be categorized as non-serious (minor), serious, or continuing noncompliance. Noncompliance may pertain to the Principal Investigator (PI), the PI s research team.
5 Definition of Serious Noncompliance Serious Noncompliance: Any failure to comply with regulations that: (a) creates an increase in risks to research subjects (b) adversely affects the rights, welfare and safety of the research subjects and/or (c) adversely affects the integrity of the University s HRPP
6 Examples of Serious Noncompliance Failing to obtain informed consent from research participants Starting and/or completing research under a protocol before meeting the conditions required by the IRB and receiving IRB notification of approval Providing inadequate supervision of research that involves potential risks to subjects Implementing changes to a research study without obtaining prior IRB approval
7 CON T Failing to recruit participants according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, or recruiting more participants than what was previously approved by the IRB Recruiting participants in the research study whose approval has already lapsed or the study has been suspended or terminated Failing to report or review serious adverse events and/or unanticipated problems to the IRB Failing to act on recommendations communicated by the IRB Office
8 Definition & Examples of Non-serious (minor) noncompliance Non-serious (minor) noncompliance: Noncompliance that does not affect the rights and the welfare of the research participants or put them at risk of harm. It also does not affect the integrity of the University s HRPP. Examples: Introducing minor changes or deviations to an IRB-approved protocol Using an approved, but non-irb stamped, consent form Failing to respond to official correspondence ( , letter) from the IRB Office which does not compromise the welfare of the research participants Not including dates of pt. consenting on ICF itself (but the date of visit documented in study log sheet)
9 Definition & Examples of Continuing Noncompliance Continuing Noncompliance: Repeated failure to understand and consistently comply with AUB IRB policies Examples: Repeated failure to comply with continuing review requirements Multiple recurrent problems with noncompliance with the same PI over a lengthy period of time, or The PI has a problem with multiple existing or previouslyapproved studies
10 Reporting of Noncompliance Any minor, serious or continuing noncompliance observed or suspected by individuals should be reported to the IRB Office. Reports can be submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) via Self-Reporting, or by any other source via telephone, e- mail, or letter to the IRB office.
11 What happens after reporting noncompliance? If the event is determined to be minor noncompliance, the IRB Chair/Vice Chair will direct the IRB Officer/Administrator to make every effort to correct the issue (s) at the administrative level, in conjunction with the PI. If the event is considered to involve serious noncompliance or continuing noncompliance, the IRB Chair/Vice Chair will initiate an Inquiry/Investigation. Inquiry/Investigation This is a fact-finding process that may involve review of research records, research data (both published and unpublished), informed consent/assent forms, interviews with associated researchers, research assistants, students, and/or direct correspondence with the PI.
12 CON T Following an Inquiry and/or Investigation, determination by the IRB as to whether noncompliance has occurred and what corrective actions, if any, will take place. Corrective actions may even be recommended where there is a determination that there was no noncompliance, if the conduct of the human research could be improved and subject safety enhanced if certain actions were taken.
13 Spectrum of IRB Determinations for Corrective Measures Approve continuation of research without changes Develop a corrective action plan (for minor noncompliance only). The plan may include, but is not limited to, the following: Additional training and education of the PI/research team Additional supervision of PI Limiting research activities of the PI Limiting the number of enrolled participants Require modifications to the protocol Revise the continuing review timetable
14 CON T Modify the consent process Modify the information disclosed in the consent document Provide additional information to current &/or past participants Require that current participants re-consent to participation Require additional training of an investigator and/or study staff Reconsider approval Monitor the research Monitor the consent process
15 CON T Suspend IRB approval for one or more of the PI s studies until proper modifications to the study protocol under scrutiny are complete Terminate IRB approval for one or more of the PI s studies Recommend further administrative action to the University Recommend further reporting to federal agencies and department heads, as required under the FWA Disallow use of data and/or deny confirmation of IRB approval for publication submissions, in cases where data were gathered in research determined to be noncompliant Conduct announced and/or unannounced audits of this project (or any of this PI s protocols)
16 New Unit: Quality Improvement Program/Research Compliance The QIP/RCU is charged with evaluating and enhancing human research protections through monitoring and coordinating education and training with the Research Education Unit of the HRPP. The QIP/RCU conducts periodic spot audits, as well as for-cause assessments as directed by the IRBs, the HRPP Director or the Institutional Official (IO). New Policies pertaining to: Noncompliance and Allegations of Noncompliance Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Monitoring and Auditing Scientific Misconduct New IRB website
17 Death of a Normal Volunteer An Asian American student at the University of Rochester responded to an advertisement for a study March 31, 1996 undergo bronchoscopy for the harvest of alveolar macrophages The bronchoscopy was difficult and required numerous doses of topical lidocaine. The subject returned to the hospital in cardiac arrest from an overdose of lidocaine and died April 2, An investigation into this death revealed: The protocol did not limit lidocaine doses. The doses were not documented. The subject was not observed after the bronchoscopy. The concentrations of lidocaine were increased without IRB approval.
18 Death on Gene Therapy Trial In the fall of 1999, an 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger died as a result of his participation in a gene transfer trial. Jesse had a rare metabolic disorder, ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency syndrome (OTC) that was being controlled by medication and diet. Researchers were testing an innovative technique using adenovirus gene transfer. Shortly after treatment, Jesse Gelsinger experienced multiple organ failure and subsequently died. Serious concerns related to the integrity of research with human subjects : Conflict of Interest Data Safety Monitoring Informed Consent
19 The Challenges Continue. New challenges of violating the norms relating to honesty and objectivity in research are coming up: Scientific misconduct : "fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism" (or FFP) Conflicts of Interest
20 Definition of Scientific Misconduct NIH defined Research misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in research. Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or Reporting them. Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
21 Allegation of Scientific Misconduct There will be an Institutional policy to describe how allegations of scientific misconduct are treated Inquiry phase fact finding to determine that there is allegation of misconduct - proceed to investigation Investigatory phase in-depth examination of situation involving meeting with involved parties Outcome of investigation if proven, sanctions imposed by institution
22 Conflict of Interest Financial interests and arrangements of clinical investigators that could affect the reliability of data to be submitted to the FDA should be identified. An applicant is required to submit to FDA a list of clinical investigators who conducted covered clinical studies and certify and/or disclose certain financial arrangements as follows: 1. Certification that no financial arrangements with an investigator have been made where study outcome could affect compensation that the investigator has no proprietary interest in the tested product
23 CON T that the investigator does not have a significant equity interest in the sponsor of the covered study and that the investigator has not received significant payments of other sorts (cumulative monetary value of $25,000) &/or 2. Disclosure of specified financial arrangements and any steps taken to minimize the potential for bias
24 Case of Scientific Misconduct Andrew Wakefield, a British surgeon and researcher, who is best known for his work regarding the MMR vaccine and its claimed connection with autism and inflammatory bowel disease He was the lead author of a 1998 study, published in The Lancet, which reported bowel symptoms in twelve children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, to which the authors suggested a possible link with the MMR vaccine The paper, press conference and resulting media coverage were linked to a steep decline in vaccination rates in the United Kingdom and a sharp rise in confirmed cases of measles, with two child fatalities, as well as others seriously ill on ventilators
25 CON T Subsequent investigation failed to confirm or reproduce Wakefield's findings. The interpretation section of the 1998 paper was subsequently retracted by ten of the paper's thirteen authors In 2004, an investigation revealed unreported conflicts of interest; and an allegation of scientific misconduct was claimed against Wakefield In March 2004, the British General Medical Council (GMC) announced an inquiry into Deer's allegations of misconduct against Wakefield and two former colleagues In 2009 alleged scientific misconduct by Wakefield in that he "fixed" the results of the Lancet paper The panel ruled that Wakefield had "failed in his duties as a responsible consultant", acted against the interests of his patients, and acted "dishonestly and irresponsibly" in his controversial research
26 CON T On February 2, 2010, The Lancet retracted his 1998 publication, noting elements of the manuscript had been falsified. Wakefield does not have a medical license in the United States, and was struck off the United Kingdom medical register in May 2010.
27 Consequences of Unethical Research Conduct Inability to present/publish data when investigators are required to provide evidence of IRB approval Inability of student to use data collected without IRB approval in thesis/dissertation Inability to use data generated by unapproved research in external or internal grant proposals (particularly to federal agencies or other sponsors that adhere to requirements for protections of human subjects)
28 CON T Harm done to institutional reputation if the absence of required oversight by IRB becomes publicly known, and the loss of trust in the institution s commitment for ethical treatment of human subjects Most harmfully, the message of the intentional disregard of institutional requirements that is being sent to student and other members of research team about the ethical integrity of investigator
29 Thank you
1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?
Investigator Responsibilities AAHRPP accreditation is a gold standard recognizing adherence to a rigorous set of human subjects protection standards that go beyond federal and state requirements. It communicates
More informationIRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College
IRB policy and procedures 1 Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College IRB policy and procedures 2 Table of Contents A. Purpose and objectives... p. 3 B. Membership of the
More informationStudent Guide To Ethics Review For Research Involving Human Subjects
Student Guide To Ethics Review For Research Involving Human Subjects - Overview - Who needs to get ethics review? - What is human subject research? - What is a Research Ethics Board (REB)? - When and how
More informationMC IRB Protocol No.:
APPLICATION FORM - INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 Phone: 914-674-7814 / Fax: 914-674-7840 / mcirb@mercy.edu MC IRB Protocol No.: Date
More informationMIAMI CHILDREN S HOSPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE
ISSUED BY: Research PAGE: 1 of 6 REPLACES POLICY DATED: EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/09/2012 DISTRIBUTION: Departmentwide APPROVED BY: Andrews, April (SVP/CECO), BOD Audit and Compliance Committee, Perdomo, Jose
More informationNCI CIRB Independent Model studies is described herein.
Review for Studies Approved by the Independent Model National Cancer Institute (NCI) Pediatric Central Institutional (Formerly entitled Facilitated IRB Review for Studies Approved by the National Cancer
More informationThe Responsible Scientist The LAB Responsible Conduct of Research
The Responsible Scientist The LAB Responsible Conduct of Research Michelle Moore Research Compliance Officer IRB Administrator Office of Sponsored Programs, Contracts and Grants Elizabeth City State University
More informationHuman Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure
Page 1 of 10 DESCRIPTION INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS Prisoners may be under constraints because of their incarceration that could affect their ability to make a truly
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE
1 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE Developed by: Dr. Eduardo Jesús Arismendi-Pardi Department of Mathematics Sheri Sterner Office
More informationUniversity of Ghana. Research Ethics Policy
University of Ghana Research Ethics Policy March, 2013 Table of Content 1. Purpose of Policy 3 2. Aims 3 3. Key Definitions.4 4. Scope of Policy.5 5. Basic Ethical Principles..5 6. Institutional Authority
More informationResearch ethics. Law, ethic, ethics Copyright Guidelines for good academic practice. Methodology Kimmo Lapintie
Research ethics Law, ethic, ethics Copyright Guidelines for good academic practice Methodology Kimmo Lapintie Law, ethic, ethics Law as the written code enforced by the monopoly of violence by the state
More informationINOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. INVESTIGATOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
INOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. INVESTIGATOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY August 24, 2012 1. Purpose Public confidence and the reputation of the company are valuable business assets that Inovio strives to
More informationResearch misconduct. Rory Jaffe
Research misconduct Rory Jaffe Kent State Responsible conduct of research Research subject protection Conflicts of interest Data management Mentor trainee relationship Collaboration Authorship and publication
More informationFraud and Misconduct in Research
Fraud and Misconduct in Research Sabine Kleinert, Senior Executive Editor, The Lancet Vice-Chair of the Committee on Publication Ethics CHEIA, Annual Conference Warwick, Sept 2008 Definitions of Research
More informationProcedure for the Investigation of Misconduct (Staff) Approved: Version 1.1 (February 2016) Summary
Procedure for the Investigation of Misconduct (Staff) Summary The Procedure applies to all UWE staff, but not to students. 1. The purpose of the Procedure is to investigate whether research misconduct
More informationDaniel T Lackland. Medical University of South Carolina
Daniel T Lackland Medical University of South Carolina Many ethical concerns must be addressed when research involves human participates. People will accept risks and inconvenience with research that leads
More informationResearch Misconduct. Introduction to. Topics, Discussion, and Group Work. Dr Fadhl Alakwaa
Research Misconduct Introduction to Research Misconduct Topics, Discussion, and Group Work Dr Fadhl Alakwaa fadlwork@gmail.com Contents 1. Learning Goals 2. Learning Objectives 3. Pre test 4. Lecture 5.
More informationComplementary and Alternative Medicine in Treating Autism Spectrum Disorders. Request for Applications
Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Treating Autism Spectrum Disorders Request for Applications Introduction Although medical care in the United States is increasingly driven by evidence-based practice,
More informationThe August 13, 2013 lecture - PI and CRC Responsibility & Oversight is not available via mediasite for GCP credit.
2013 Responsible Conduct in Research Lecture Series How to get 8 Hours of CME/GCP Credit Physicians can receive CME credit for these, and everyone receives GCP Education credit towards the GCP Education
More informationOutline. Bioethics in Research and Publication. What is ethics? Where do we learn ethics? 6/19/2015
Outline Bioethics in Research and Publication Gertrude Night, PhD Rwanda Agriculture Board What is ethics? History. The purpose of training in research ethics Some ethical principles addressed by research
More informationReporting to the IRB Part 2
Webinar Series Reporting to the IRB Part 2 Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2013 Presented by: James MacFarlane Director of Board Services About Schulman Associates IRB Established in 1983 US and
More informationYahya Zakaria Eid, Ph.D. Faculty of Agriculture,, Kafrelsheikh University
Yahya Zakaria Eid, Ph.D. Faculty of Agriculture,, Kafrelsheikh University yahya.eid@agr.kfs.edu.eg yahyaze@gmail.com http://www.webometrics.info/en/aw/egypt http://www.webometrics.info/en/aw/egypt Jan
More informationZ E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy
TheZenith's Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy Application: Zenith Insurance Company and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Policy
More informationMini Summit XIV: Clinical Trial Disclosure and Results Reporting Liability under FDAAA, Section 801
Mini Summit XIV: Clinical Trial Disclosure and Results Reporting Liability under FDAAA, Section 801 Jarilyn Dupont, JD Director of Regulatory Policy, Office of Policy Office of Commissioner, U.S. Food
More informationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES GLOSSARY: Administrative Hold (initiated by the investigator): A voluntary action by the investigator to put research
More informationBased on the preponderance of evidence, the Scientific Integrity Review Panel (SIRP) finds that
Title: Publication of scientific paper while it was under review by the Scientific Integrity Review Panel. (supplement to ESO-S0000328) Summary of supplemental misconduct (ESO-S0000328): Based on the preponderance
More informationEXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists
EXEMPT RESEARCH Introduction Many educational, behavioral, and social science studies present little or no risk to the participants. Likewise, research involving existing data, medical records, and pathologic
More informationProtecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:
Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research: Working with the IRB Lloyd Byrd, MS Chair, VCU IRB Panel E Member, VCU IRB Panel B Monika S. Markowitz, Ph.D. Director, Office of Research
More informationRESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS
RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS Office of Research 1. Overview Federal regulations require additional protections for prisoners involved in research. These requirements include, among other things, that research
More informationNEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Administrative Manual ADMINISTRATION
Chapter NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Administrative Manual ADMINISTRATION EFFECTIVE: Policy REVISED: 4/13/9 draft NALOXONE DISTRIBUTION POLICY I. PURPOSE: This New Mexico Department of Health (NMDOH)
More informationSALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS If you have a full committee review: 1. Your proposal must be submitted at minimum 14 days before the
More informationAPPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM
APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM For Research Involving Human Participants Institutional Review Board (IRB) Contact Information: The Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (Billy C. Black Building,
More informationResearch Compliance Services
Research Compliance Services What is that? NUramp October 15, 2013 Conflict of Interest Institutional Review Board/Human Research Protections Program Responsible Conduct of Research Research Misconduct
More informationConflict of Interest Policy
Revised 10/13/2016 Conflict of Interest Policy All AMIA leaders have an obligation to make decisions and conduct affairs of the organization based, first and foremost, upon the desire to promote AMIA and
More informationDepartment of the Navy Human Research Protection Program
Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program Research Involving Human Subjects August 2013 Regulations Four sources: 32 CFR 219 (Common Rule) DoDI 3216.02 SECNAVINST 3900.39D 21 CFR 50 and
More informationETHICAL ASPECTS OF AUTHORSHIP & PUBLICATION. Joe Henry Steinbach. Department of Anesthesiology Division of Biomedical Sciences
ETHICAL ASPECTS OF AUTHORSHIP & PUBLICATION Joe Henry Steinbach Department of Anesthesiology Division of Biomedical Sciences Program for the Ethical and Responsible Conduct of Science and Scholarship (PERCSS)
More informationSection 32: BIMM Institute Student Disciplinary Procedure
Section 32: BIMM Institute Student Disciplinary Procedure Introduction Academic Development & Quality Assurance Manual This Student Disciplinary Procedure provides a framework for the regulation of BIMM
More information11/9/2016. Therapeutic Misconception and the Clinical Investigator. Beyond Protocol Deviations
Therapeutic Misconception and the Clinical Investigator Beyond Protocol Deviations Kristen Grace, M.D., Ph.D. Director, Human Research Integrity Weill Cornell Medical College 1 Therapeutic Misconception
More informationOffice of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects
Office of Research Compliance Research Involving Human Subjects Office of Research Compliance Three FTE and one student worker Facilitate the IACUC We are not the IRB or the IACUC Best way to contact us
More informationRevised August 28, 2018
Florida State University Human Subjects Committee Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) 7-IRB-26 Title: Responsible Executive: Approving Official: Prisoners as Research Subjects Gary K. Ostrander Gary K.
More informationFlorida State University Policy 7-IRB-26
Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26 Title of Policy: Special Categories of Research: Prisoners as Research Subjects. Responsible Executive: Gary K. Ostrander Approving Official: Gary K. Ostrander
More informationIntroduction. Current status of 510(k) clinical data requirements. 1 Current Status&Considerations:
510(k) Current Status&Considerations: Conducting a Well-Controlled Clinical Study When Clinical Data is Required Introduction In an effort to promote innovation while protecting the population at large,
More informationTitle 32: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Title 32: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS Chapter 45-A: PHYSICAL THERAPIST PRACTICE ACT Table of Contents Section 3111. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 3111-A. SCOPE OF PRACTICE... 3 Section 3112. BOARD CREATED;
More informationHuman Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review
Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review 1. Project Title and Identification As Principal Investigator of this study, I assure the IRB that the following statements are true:
More informationNOTICE OF INITIATION OF DISQUALIFICATION PROCEEDINGS AND OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 1401 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-1448 September 26, 2011 By Overnight Delivery Michael Dean Berger, M.D.
More informationIRB review of device studies
Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker 2011 Device Advice from the FDA 2011 Conferences 2011 IRB review of device studies Jonathan M. Green Washington University School of Medicine
More informationAPPLICATION TO EMPLOY A
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY 2005 Evergreen Street, SUITE 1400 SACRAMENTO, CA 95815-3831 (916) 263-2699 ext. 3303 www.psychboard.ca.gov
More informationIRB Red Flags How to Know When IRB Review May Be Needed
IRB Red Flags How to Know When IRB Review May Be Needed Human Research Protection Program Presented by Catherine Higgins, Ph.D., CIP, CIM HRPP Director Historical Ethical Atrocities Tuskegee Syphilis Study
More informationDELTA DENTAL PREMIER
DELTA DENTAL PREMIER PARTICIPATING DENTIST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of, 20 by and between Colorado Dental Service, Inc. d/b/a Delta Dental of Colorado, as first party, hereinafter
More informationInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
Home > Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations > Enforcement Actions > Warning Letters Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Punjwani, Sohail S., M.D.
More informationGuidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices
Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices An unapproved medical device may normally only be used on human subjects through an approved clinical study in which the subjects meet certain criteria
More informationTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE RESEARCH PROPOSAL FORM This proposal is: (check where applicable) Dissertation Research: Grant Proposal: Funding Agency: Master's Thesis Research: Faculty
More informationInstitutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants. IRB Presentation. University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants IRB Presentation University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization 407-823-2901 or fax 407-823-3299 www.research.ucf.edu/compliance/irb.html
More informationHOUSE AND PROPERTY INSPECTION CASE SUMMARIES 2017
HOUSE AND PROPERTY INSPECTION CASE SUMMARIES 2017 Note: Reference to one gender implies both genders, unless indicated otherwise. CASE #15-26 (2) That the Respondent, a Certified House Inspector (CHI),
More informationResearch Services Research integrity
Research integrity Department of Materials induction session Kathryn Dally Assistant Registrar () 22 January 2014 What is research integrity? Also known as research ethics, good practice in research or
More informationJudicial & Ethics Policy
Judicial & Ethics Policy Copyright (c) 2017. National Board for Respiratory Care, Inc. All Rights Reserved. (The designations NBRC, CRT, RRT, CPFT and RPFT are federally registered service marks of the
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Policies and Definitions promotes and supports human research. Basic tenets of human research are voluntary participation and the ethical treatment of the subjects in the research
More informationSUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners
MANUAL: Administrative Policy & Procedure Manual SJMHS Locations: St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, St. Joseph Mercy Chelsea, St. Joseph Mercy Livingston, St. Mary Mercy Livonia POLICY: Persons meeting the federal
More informationEthics. A Little History. The Nuremberg Doctors Trial of From Belmont Report
Ethics From Belmont Report A Little History It is important to look at history We learn from our mistakes History can repeat itself! The Nuremberg Doctors Trial of 1946 The Milgram Study Thalidomide Tragedy
More informationTRAUMA RECOVERY/HAP OPERATING GUIDELINES
TRAUMA RECOVERY/HAP OPERATING GUIDELINES FOR THE NATIONAL TRAUMA RECOVERY NETWORK, THE TRAUMA RECOVERY NETWORK ASSOCIATIONS, AND THE TRAUMA RECOVERY NETWORK CHAPTERS Operating Guidelines These Operating
More informationProtection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures
Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Introduction Wilmington University has a functioning committee and procedures to review and approve all research involving human subjects. All human
More informationThe Complaint Department: How IRBs Handle Complaints, Questions and Concerns from Study Participants
Webinar Series The Complaint Department: How IRBs Handle Complaints, Questions and Concerns from Study Participants July 29, 2015 Presented by: James MacFarlane, HRPP Director, University of New Mexico
More informationBIENNIAL REVIEW Compliance with the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act. St. Johns River State College
BIENNIAL REVIEW Compliance with the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act St. Johns River State College 2016-2018 The Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1989, Public Law 101-226, requires that St.
More informationDrug Testing Policy and Procedures Revised July2009
Drug Testing Policy and Procedures Revised July2009 PLEASE NOTE: COACHES IN EACH SPORT MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL POLICIES THAT ARE STRICTER THAN DEPARTMENTAL POLICIES CITED HEREIN. Drug Policy Drug use (excluding
More informationAPPLICATION TO INVOLVE HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (Form IAUPRIRB-1)
INTER AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO INVOLVE HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (Form IAUPRIRB-1) TITLE*: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR S NAME, TELEPHONE AND POSTAL ADDRESS*:
More informationINTERNSHIP DUE PROCESS GUIDELINES
INTERNSHIP DUE PROCESS GUIDELINES DEFINITION OF PROBLEM For purposes of this document Intern problem is defined broadly as an interference in professional functioning which is reflected in one or more
More informationStandards for Professional Conduct In The Practice of Dentistry
Standards for Professional Conduct In The Practice of Dentistry Preamble The Standards for Professional Conduct for licensees of the Virginia Board of Dentistry establishes a set of principles to govern
More informationDEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR S OFFICE BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY GENERAL RULES
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR S OFFICE BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY GENERAL RULES (By authority conferred on the director of the department of licensing and regulatory affairs by
More informationIC Applicability Sec. 1. The definitions in this chapter apply throughout this article. As added by P.L , SEC.8.
IC 25-21.8 ARTICLE 21.8. MASSAGE THERAPISTS IC 25-21.8-1 Chapter 1. Definitions IC 25-21.8-1-1 Applicability Sec. 1. The definitions in this chapter apply throughout this article. IC 25-21.8-1-1.5 Approved
More informationAuthorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students
Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences Table of Contents Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students...
More informationEthics of Research. A Guide to Practice at Northumbria
Ethics of Research A Guide to Practice at Northumbria 1. Sources of Ethics Policy 2. Importance 3. Ethical Risk Categories 4. Approval Process 5. Key provisions 6. Judgment Issues 7. What next 8. Governance
More informationDepartment of the Navy Human Research Protection Program
Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program Exempt Research and Expedited Review March 2013 Unclassified Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited IRB Review Decision
More informationInstitutional Review Board. Policies and Procedures
Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures Revised: November 2015 Originally Adopted: July 1, 1995 Office of the Provost IRB Policy and Procedures 2 Table of Contents Section 1: Overview... 3 1.2
More informationDRUG TESTING FOR DISTRICT PERSONNEL REQUIRED TO HOLD A COMMERCIAL DRIVER S LICENSE
DRUG TESTING FOR DISTRICT PERSONNEL REQUIRED TO HOLD A COMMERCIAL DRIVER S LICENSE School bus drivers and others required to hold a commercial driver s license (CDL) are subject to a drug and alcohol testing
More informationIRB POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
IRB POLICIES AND PROCEDURES I. Background and Administration... 2 Chapter 1. Background and Principles... 2 Chapter 2. Governmental Oversight and Regulations... 5 Chapter 3: IRB Scope and Authority...
More informationFinancial Administration and Control of Research and Special Funds
1 2 3 Financial Administration and Control of Research and Special Funds 4 Financial Administration and Control of Research and Special Funds Presenter Name Colin Nicolson Presenter Title Assistant Manager
More informationTEMPERATURE. Monitoring the. of Your VACCINES. for Children Program Compliance. By Svetlana (Lana) Ros, Esq., and David L. Adelson, Esq.
Monitoring the TEMPERATURE of Your VACCINES for Children Program Compliance By Svetlana (Lana) Ros, Esq., and David L. Adelson, Esq. 10 CME In order to obtain AMA PRA Category 1 Credit, participants are
More informationCommunity Friends THIRD PARTY FUNDRAISING
Community Friends THIRD PARTY FUNDRAISING Thank you for selecting the Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester as the beneficiary of your fundraising event or activity (mutually referred to as event ). The
More informationInformation about cases being considered by the Case Examiners
Information about cases being considered by the Case Examiners 13 October 2016 1 Contents Purpose... 3 What should I do next?... 3 Background... 4 Criteria that Case Examiners will consider... 5 Closing
More informationModel Intervention for Students with Substance Abuse Problems Act
Model Intervention for Students with Substance Abuse Problems Act MODEL INTERVENTION FOR STUDENTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS ACT Table of Contents G-103 Policy Statement G-105 Highlights Section One
More informationEthical essay about the misconduct in research
DEN 11 NOVEMBER 2016 BIMM34 Sara El-Karssifi Taleb In this essay I will define the definition misconduct and define historical situations of misconduct. I will make awareness of today s scientific misconduct
More informationPublication ethics- a legal perspective Tamsin Harwood
Publication ethics- a legal perspective Tamsin Harwood taharwood@wiley.com Trust A firm belief in the reliability, truth, or ability of someone or something Oxford Dictionaries- Definition of Trust Publisher
More informationDetermination on Serious Professional Misconduct (SPM) and sanction:
This case is being considered by a Fitness to Practise Panel applying the General Medical Council s Preliminary Proceedings Committee and Professional Conduct Committee (Procedure) Rules 1988 Date: 24
More informationBiennial Review of Umpqua Community College s Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program June 2018
Biennial Review of Umpqua Community College s Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program June 2018 I. Introduction to Biennial Review Federal Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations require institutions
More informationInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
Home Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Enforcement Actions Warning Letters Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Burzynski Research Institute
More informationUNIVERSITY POLICY STUDENT LIFE & INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION POLICIES
UNIVERSITY POLICY STUDENT LIFE & INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION POLICIES Number: 703 Subject: Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Substance Abuse Policy Covered Individuals: UIU Students and Employees Covered
More informationCandidate and Facilitator Standards Policy
Candidate and Facilitator Standards Policy Practicing Within the Scope of Existing Licensing, Training and/or Certification: The Daring Way is a curriculum that should be used in conjunction with existing
More informationBARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research
BARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research Project Title Principal Investigator Name and highest earned degree: Office Phone: Facsimile Phone Number: Department:
More informationST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014 1. Introduction The St. Michael s Hospital (SMH) REB
More informationOHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research
NOTE: THIS GUIDANCE REPLACES THE FOLLOWING OHRP GUIDANCE: "OHRP Guidance on Approving Research Involving Prisoners" (May 19, 2000) found on the OHRP website at: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/prison.htm
More informationAdult at Risk Safeguarding and Protection Policy
Adult at Risk Safeguarding and Protection Policy 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the policy The purpose of this policy is to provide a framework for all staff and volunteers within Ambitious about Autism.
More informationFlinders University is committed to maintaining a culture that promotes the responsible conduct, management and reporting of research.
Research Integrity Flinders University is committed to maintaining a culture that promotes the responsible conduct, management and reporting of research. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
More informationType of Review Requested:
Type of Review Requested: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY IRB Protocol # Exempt [Status (see RR 101)] Expedited Full Board For details regarding types of review, please see Levels of Review under FAQ at www.seu.edu/irb
More informationREQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB
REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB Please read the following text, adapted from the CITI Education Module (Braunschweiger,
More informationHSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)
HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants) This form is to be completed by the Principal Investigator (P.I.) of the research project being submitted to the
More informationAndrew Wakefield. Andrea Beer
Andrew Wakefield Andrea Beer Measles Highly contagious Caused by the measles virus Initial signs and symptoms Fever (often greater than 40 C) Cough/Bronchitis Rhinitis Conjunctivitis Koplik s spots Red,
More informationBloodborne Pathogens. Exposure Control Plan
Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan Maryland Institute College of Art Revision Date(s): January 2007/January 2008 Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA) Subject: Occupational/Non-occupational
More informationPOLICY ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR STUDENTS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
POLICY ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR STUDENTS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY I. POLICY STATEMENT: Charleston Southern University ("the University") is committed to maintaining a Christian environment for work,
More informationTOBACCO CONTROL POLICY
TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY MONROE COUNTY FILE: JFCG-1 Page 1 of 6 Section 1. GENERAL: 1.1 Scope. This policy sets the requirements for schools in Monroe County to be tobacco free. 1.2 Authority. W.VA.. Constitution,
More informationKANSAS MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. Fee-for-Service Provider Manual. Rehabilitative Therapy Services
Fee-for-Service Provider Manual Rehabilitative Therapy Services Updated 12.2015 PART II (PHYSICAL THERAPY, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, SPEECH/LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY) Introduction Section BILLING INSTRUCTIONS Page
More information