Antifungals in Invasive Fungal Infections: Antifungals in neutropenic patients

Transcription

1 BVIKM-SBIMC La Hulpe, 6 November 2008 Antifungals in Invasive Fungal Infections: Antifungals in neutropenic patients Johan Maertens, MD Acute Leukemia and SCT Unit University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Belgium

2 Outline of this 20 min. talk Fungal epidemiology in neutropenic patients Which drugs should be on the hospital formulary? In which situation should these agents be used? What are the major drawbacks?!

3 Invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies: an autopsy series MD Anderson Cancer Hospital: autopsies; invasive mycoses 319 (31%) Increasing frequency of molds: 19% to 25 Etiological agent , (%) , (%) Aspergillus Zygomycetes Candida 13 8 Chamilos et al. Haematologica 2006; 91: 986-9

4 Invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies*: Italian data * excluding allogeneic transplant Aspergillus 90% Zygomycetes 4% Fusarium 4% Others 2% Candida 91% Cryptococcus 4% Trichosporon 4% Others 2% AML ALL CML CLL NHL HD MM Total Molds Yeasts Pagano L et al. Haematologica 2006; 91:

5 Candidemia in cancer patients: hematological Breakthrough malignancy De vs. novo solid tumor candidemia candidemia Hemato Malig Solid T P value (n =281) (n=354) C. albicans 14% 45% <0.001 C. glabrata 31% 18% <0.001 C. parapsilosis 14% 20% 0.05 C. krusei 24% 2% <0.001 C. tropicalis 10% 8% ns Fluco prophylaxis > 50% 16% <0.001 Response AF Rx 49% 73% <0.001 Kontoyiannis et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23: 542

6 Use of Fluco as a Surrogate Marker To Predict Susceptibility and Resistance to Vorico (and Posaco) (CLSI) r=0.93 Pfaller et al. JCM 2007; 45: 70 and 2008; 46: 551

7 The continuum of invasive fungal infection From colonization to disease Colonization Dx-driven Therapy No disease Targeted prophylaxis Signs & symptoms Full-blown disease Sequelae Prophylaxis In high-risk patient Empirical High-risk patient on antibiotics with persistent fever Therapy Invasive aspergillosis Invasive candidiasis

8 Success (%) Primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis: response rate vs. survival Voriconazole Amphotericin B Ambisome 3 mg 70.8% 72% 52.8% 57.9% 50% 31.6% Wk12 or EOT Wk 12 Herbrecht et al. N Engl J Med 2002; Cornely et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007

9 Voriconazole for proven/probable IA: AI (ECIL and IDSA) A M B I S O M E 3 Prior azole therapy Voriconazole contraindicated Potential for serious drug interactions Hepatic impairment Moderate to severe renal impairment and IV administration Mixed mold possible (Children < 2 years of age) (Cardiac risk factors) Persistent/breakthrough infection Hepatic impairment development Treatment intolerance A L T E R N A T I V E

10 Salvage for Invasive Aspergillosis Refractory / intolerant caspofungin n=146 posaconazole n=107 ampho B lipid complex voriconazole n=144 response 40% 40% 40% 40%

11 Arrhythmia Congestive heart f... Hepatic impairement Diabetes Neurological ab... Renal insufficiency Any other importan.. Hemodynamic in... Respiratory failure % Hemato ICU

12 Why do patients with IA fail voriconazole therapy? Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring Retrospective study of 28 patients Drug monitoring because of progression (17) or toxicity (11) 15 of 17 with progression has a transplant and IA VCZ > 2.05 µg/ml < 2.05 µg/ml No. of patients Favorable res 10 (100%) 8 (44%) P<0.025 Smith et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:

13 Agent Invasive Candida infection in leukemia: ECIL guidelines 2007 Overall population Fluconazole AI CIII Amphotericin B deoxycholate AI Lipid-amphotericin B AII BII Caspofungin AI BII Voriconazole AI BII Patients with hematological malignancies and neutropenia DIII if azole prophylaxis or colonisation with C. glabrata EIII if colonisation withc. krusei CIII Herbrecht et al. Eur J Cancer Suppl 2007; 2: 49-59

14 Empirical antifungal therapy: Probably the best available antifungal approach in the absence of sophisticated diagnostic tools

15 Empirical antifungal therapy Objective: treatment of occult fungal infections, not prevention Target population: prolonged neutropenic patients with Persistent fever despite days broad- spectrum antibiotics OR Recurrent fever following initial resolution and persistent neutropenia (allogeneic HSCT recipients with undifferentiated fever) (prolonged fever on ICU)

16 Conclusions from the empirical studies There are several reasonable choices for the empirical antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients: L-AmB, itraconazole, caspofungin, [voriconazole]. None of these agents has demonstrated superiority over a comparator, thus none stands above the crowd with respect to efficacy. These large studies have provided enormous data with regard to safety and have advanced our understanding of this condition in general. Double-blind studies are essential to minimize investigator bias, e.g. early withdrawal of pts. Fever as an element of the composite outcome score must be reassessed

17 Caspofungin: My agent of choice, based on safety endpoints! (Confidence Intervals for the difference) Nephrotoxicity Infusion-related AE Drug-related AE Discontinuation Due to Drug-related AE Difference in % Favors Caspofungin Favors AmBisome

18 Fluconazole prophylaxis in HSCT recipients Auto (48%) + Allo (52%) FLU (400 mg/d) vs. placebo engraftment Auto (12%) + Allo (88%) FLU (400 mg/d) vs. placebo day 75 Marr et al. Blood 2000; 96: 2055 Persistent Candida-related death Secondary effects: GI GvHD Protection against CY-toxicities ** * * * * Goodman JL et al. N Engl J Med. 1992;326: Slavin MA et al. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:

19 Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients: Fluco v. Drug with Antimold Activity: Meta-analysis Outcome Fluco Anti-mold Relative risk* All-cause mortality 248/ / Fungal-related mortality 49/ / Documented IFI 53/ / Any IFI 237/ / Documented non-albicans Candida 23/ / Documented Aspergillus 83/ / * Relative risk > 1 favors the anti-mold group Posaconazole Robenshtok et al. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (34)

20 Incidence of proven & probable IFIs (primary time point) POS Comparator Incidence of IFI, % % HSCT + GVHD P =.0740 P = % 2% 7% % 8% AML/MDS P =.0009 P = % 7% 0 16/301 27/299 7/301 21/299 All IFIs Invasive aspergillosis 0 7/304 25/298 20/298 2/304 All IFIs Invasive aspergillosis Ullmann et al. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: Cornely et al. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:

21 AML/MDS Time to Death (overall mortality) 100 During 100 days from randomization Survival Distribution Function Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to death within the 100-day phase shows a significant survival benefit in favor of POS (P =.0354), Time From Randomization to Death During the First 100 Days From Randomization Posaconazole Posaconazole censored Other azole Other azole censored Censoring time is the minimum of the last contact date and day 100

22 Antifungal Prophylaxis ECIL recommendations Chemotherapy/ Autologous transpl. HSCT Preengraftment Engraftment GVHD + Immunosuppressive Therapy ANC (cells/mm 3 ) 500 Posaconazole: AI Posaconazole: AI Lip AmB: CI Micafungin: CI Fluconazole: CI Fluconazole: AI Itraconazole Os: CI Itraconazole IV/Os: BI

23 Some words of caution Unanticipated side effects See itraconazole and cyclophosphamide Need for therapeutic drug monitoring See itraconazole/voriconazole Dose-response relation in salvage therapy Effect of food intake: what about mucositis? Drug interactions An azole class effect (although fewer than comparators) Changes in colonizing/infecting flora See voriconazole How to handle breakthrough infections? Interference with diagnostic tools False sense of security

24 Aspergillus Voriconazole/ Liposomal AmB My personal algorithm Proven/probable IFI Caspofungin Candida (yeast) Other mold Based on specific organism VOR/Ambisome Caspofungin Susceptible Resistant Fluconazole Caspofungin

25 the hematologist s s formulary choice* Fluco IV/or: : prophylaxis (+ Dx-driven approach) and step down therapy IC (susceptible isolates) Ketoco/Itraco: : endemic mycosis Vorico IV/or: : 1 st line IA and fusariosis and scedosporiosis Posaco OS: : prophylaxis neutropenia AML-MDS MDS Isavuco: :?? Caspo IV: : empirical and 1 st line Candida and 2 nd line IA Anidula and mica: - C AmphoB: - Liposomal ampho B IV: : alternative of choice 1 st line IA and 1 st line zygomycosis Aersolized liposomal ampho B: + Other lipid formulations: - * Not taking into account Belgian reimbursement criteria