Ovarian Ablation as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
|
|
- Anissa Beasley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ovarian Ablation as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer Nancy E. Davidson Ovarian ablation was the first form of systemic treatment for breast cancer. Its efficacy as a palliative treatment for young women with metastatic breast cancer was initially described by Beatson (1) in Its use as a form of adjuvant therapy was suggested shortly thereafter, and the first randomized trials of ovarian ablation in the adjuvant setting began in Although many of these early trials were small and methodologically flawed by modern standards, their combined analysis through the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTG) has unequivocally established that ovarian ablation as a single intervention reduces recurrence and increases survival for women under the age of 50 years (2). Indeed, the magnitude of the benefit is similar to that seen with adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen by indirect comparison (3,4). Thus, the possibility that the benefit conferred by adjuvant chemotherapy is in part because of its ability to induce ovarian failure has been raised. Adjuvant studies of ovarian ablation during the last 50 years have focused largely on three major questions. The first trials examined the utility of ovarian ablation versus no postoperative therapy. Increasing use of chemotherapy and the recognition that part of its effects could be related to a chemical castration led to randomized comparisons of adjuvant chemotherapy and ovarian ablation with or without tamoxifen. Finally, several recent trials have examined the possibility that ovarian ablation has additional benefit in young women who have received adjuvant chemotherapy. It is surprising that little information is available comparing ovarian ablation and tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. FORMS OF OVARIAN ABLATION Surgical oophorectomy was the original form of ovarian ablation. Its advantage is that it causes an immediate and permanent drop in ovarian steroid production. In the past, the surgical complication rate was relatively high, but current methods of laparoscopic surgery have dramatically reduced postoperative morbidity and mortality. Oophorectomy has the second theoretical advantage of reducing risk of ovarian cancer, which could be potentially useful in women who are genetically predisposed to ovarian cancer. The advent of therapeutic radiation led to the design of trials of radiation-induced ovarian ablation. Treatment algorithms were variable, ranging from 450 cgy in one fraction to cgy over five to six fractions. Radiation-induced ovarian ablation is a safe and simple outpatient approach. Its disadvantage is that it may be incomplete or reversible in some women. During the last 20 years, medical ovarian ablation has emerged as a treatment strategy. A number of analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) have been studied as treatment for breast cancer. Chronic administration of the LHRH agonists leads to a temporary chemical castration. Ovarian production of estrogen is governed by the pulsatile release of LHRH from the hypothalamus. This leads to pituitary production of gonadotropins that then act on the ovary to stimulate steroidogenesis. LHRH agonists bind to pituitary gonadotropin receptors more avidly than to native LHRH. This leads to an initial surge in gonadotropin production, but loss of pituitary LHRH receptors, diminished gonadotropin secretion, and cessation of ovarian steroid production then ensue. Two LHRH analogues are available in the United States (goserelin and leuprolide) and can be administered by monthly injection; neither is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. The possible advantages of LHRH analogues are their ease of administration and reversible effects. Side effects are largely those of menopause. The relative efficacy of surgical, therapeutic radiation, and medical ovarian ablation is not well defined. Indeed, it is generally assumed that these three modalities are equally effective in breast cancer, and the approaches are frequently considered and used interchangeably. Small comparative trials of goserelin with surgery or therapeutic radiation-induced ovarian ablation for treatment of advanced breast cancer have supported this supposition, but it is not known if these results suggesting equivalence in metastatic breast cancer can be extrapolated to the adjuvant setting, where duration of treatment is potentially critical (5). Cytotoxic chemotherapy represents a fourth form of ovarian ablation because of its capacity to cause temporary or permanent ovarian dysfunction in a substantial number of premenopausal women. The risk of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea is directly related to age at time of treatment and varies with type, dose, and duration of chemotherapy. In general, less than 50% of women under 40 years of age will be rendered postmenopausal by standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, whereas the majority of women aged 40 or more years of age will become permanently menopausal. Rates of permanent amenorrhea have been reported for several commonly used adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. They range from about 40% after four cycles of doxorubicin and cylophosphamide (AC) with or without four cycles of paclitaxel to nearly 70% for six cycles of oral cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) (6 8). Thus, ovarian ablation is potentially an indirect effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. ROLE OF OVARIAN ABLATION The largest body of data regarding the use of ovarian ablation for adjuvant therapy is the EBCTG meta-analysis. Results for the 15-year analysis were collected in 1995 and published in 1996 (2). Updated data from the 2000 EBCTG meta-analysis have been presented in a preliminary fashion, but analysis is still incomplete. The 1995 overview summarized results from 12 of Correspondence to: Nancy E. Davidson, M.D., The Johns Hopkins Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1650 Orleans St., Rm. 409, Baltimore, MD ( davidna@jhmi.edu). See Note following References. Oxford University Press Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs No. 30,
2 the 13 randomized studies that assessed ovarian ablation by surgery or irradiation. These trials began before They enrolled 2102 women under age 50 years and 1354 women greater than or equal to 50 years old at randomization. Analysis was focused on the younger women, since no statistically significant impact of ovarian ablation on outcome for the older women (who were presumably mostly postmenopausal) was observed. Five of the trials included routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas the other trials did not. Selected results from the 1995 EBCTG overview analysis are presented in Table 1. Ovarian ablation led to a 25% ± 7% reduction in the annual odds of recurrence and a 24% ± 7% reduction in the annual odds of death for women who underwent ovarian ablation in the absence of chemotherapy. The benefit is seen in women with both lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive disease. There was a trend for greater efficacy of ablation in women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, although this parameter was assessed only in four of the 12 trials, all of which included chemotherapy. The benefit was less pronounced for women who were randomly assigned to ovarian ablation in the presence of chemotherapy (10% ± 9% reduction for recurrence and 8% ± 10% reduction in mortality). These results likely reflect, in part, the fact that many women became postmenopausal as a consequence of adjuvant chemotherapy. Taken together, these analyses established the clinical benefit of ovarian ablation as an adjuvant approach for young women with breast cancer. It is important that this analysis found no difference in vascular deaths or other non-breast cancer deaths between women allocated to ovarian ablation and those who were not so allocated. A number of issues complicate interpretation of these results. Most of these trials were small, limiting statistical power. The analysis was based on patient age rather than on actual menopausal status. The hormone receptor status was frequently not available in these older trials. Since it is probable that the benefits of ovarian ablation are most pronounced in premenopausal women with steroid receptor-positive tumors, the true magnitude of benefit might be diluted. Further, these trials did not address other questions of interest, including 1) the relative efficacy of ovarian ablation and chemotherapy, 2) the value of ovarian ablation in conjunction with chemotherapy, 3) the utility of combined endocrine therapy with ovarian ablation and tamoxifen, and 4) the use of temporary ovarian ablation through the application of LHRH agonists. A number of trials conducted during the last 20 years have begun to shed light on these issues. Table 1. Selected results from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group overview analysis of ovarian ablation for women under 50 years of age* Patients 15-y disease-free survival, % 15-y survival, % All Control Ovarian ablation 45} P< } P.001 Lymph node-negative no chemotherapy Control Ovarian ablation 75} P.01 77} P.01 Lymph node-positive no chemotherapy Control } P<.001 } P<.001 Ovarian ablation *Data from (2). COMPARISONS OF OVARIAN ABLATION AND CHEMOTHERAPY The recognition that the clinical benefits of adjuvant ovarian ablation and chemotherapy were of similar magnitude by indirect comparison for young women led to several trials comparing these two interventions. A key feature of these newer trials is that they generally define eligibility based on menopausal status rather than on age and frequently restrict entry to women with receptor-positive breast cancer, thus targeting the women who might most likely benefit from an endocrine approach. These trials are summarized in Table 2. Three trials have compared adjuvant ovarian ablation using different modalities with CMF chemotherapy. The Scottish/ Imperial Cancer Research Fund trial randomly assigned 332 premenopausal women with lymph node-positive breast cancer to oophorectomy (with or without prednisolone) or to six to eight cycles of intravenous CMF (with or without prednisolone) (9). There was no difference in event-free or overall survival after a maximum follow-up of 12 years. ER assays were available for 270 tumors. Retrospective analyses of these tissues suggested that oophorectomy was associated with improved survival in patients with ER concentrations greater than or equal to 20 fmol/mg protein, whereas 6 months of oral CMF was more beneficial for patients with ER less than 20 fmol/mg protein. A second trial assessed radiation-induced ovarian ablation or nine cycles of intravenous CMF in 732 women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer that involved axillary lymph nodes or measured more than 5 cm (10). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 67% with ovarian ablation and 66% with CMF. Corresponding survival rates were 78% and 82%, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Of note is that amenorrhea occurred in 68% of the patients who received CMF. The largest trial of this design, the Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association (ZEBRA) Trial, compared six cycles of oral CMF with 2 years of monthly doses of goserelin in 1640 premenopausal women with lymph node-positive tumors (11). About 80% of the patients had ER-positive tumors and, with a median follow-up of 6 years, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival were equivalent for the two treatments in these women. In contrast, CMF led to a statistically significantly longer DFS and overall survival than goserelin for women with ER-negative breast cancer. In this study, about two thirds of patients regained menstrual function within a year after completion of 2 years of goserelin, whereas 80% of women treated with CMF remained amenorrheic at 3 years. Subset analysis suggested that patients treated with CMF who became amenorrheic after therapy had a longer DFS than those who did not. Patientassessed quality of life was better for goserelin than for CMF during the first 6 months of treatment. Bone loss was substantial with both treatments and improved after completion of goserelin but not after completion of CMF. These results suggest that temporary ovarian ablation using goserelin is a reasonable alternative to CMF chemotherapy for women with lymph nodepositive ER-positive breast cancer. None of these trials used tamoxifen. However, the concept of combined endocrine therapy versus CMF has also been tested in two randomized trials. The Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemo- Hormone Therapy Cooperative Group 02 study compared oral CMF for 6 months with the combination of ovarian ablation and 68 Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs No. 30, 2001
3 Table 2. Randomized trials of chemotherapy versus ovarian ablation with or without tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy* Study Patients No. Treatments Results Reference Nos. Scottish Lymph node-positive 332 CMF 6 8 No difference (9) Oophorectomy Scandinavian Stage II, receptor-positive 732 CMF 9 No difference (10) XRT ZEBRA Lymph node-positive 1640 CMF 6 No difference for ER-positive; (11) Goserelin 2 y CMF better for ER-negative GROCTA 02 Lymph node-positive, receptor-positive 235 CMF 6 No difference (12) Ovarian ablation + tamoxifen 5 y ABCSG 5 Stage I/II, receptor-positive 1045 CMF 6 Better RFS with endocrine therapy (13,14) Goserelin 3 y + tamoxifen 5 y French Lymph node-positive, ER-positive 162 FAC 6 No difference (15) Ovarian ablation + tamoxifen FASG 06 Lymph node-positive, ER-positive 333 FEC 6 Triptoreline + tamoxifen 5 y No difference (16) *Abbreviations used: C cyclophosphamide; A doxorubicin; F 5-fluorouracil; M methotrexate; E epirubicin; XRT radiation therapy; ER estrogen receptor; RFS recurrence-free survival; ZEBRA Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association; GROCTA Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemo-Hormone Therapy Cooporative Group; ABCSG Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group; FASG French Adjuvant Study Group. 5 years of tamoxifen in 244 premenopausal women with axillary lymph node-positive, steroid receptor-positive breast cancer (12). Ovarian ablation could be carried out by surgery, radiation therapy, or 2 years of goserelin. With a median follow-up of 76 months, there was no difference in DFS or overall survival. There was no obvious difference in outcome with any type of ovarian ablation, although the power of this subset analysis is severely limited by the small sample size. A larger trial of similar design was conducted by the Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) (13,14). ABCSG 5 compared intravenous CMF for six cycles with goserelin for 3 years and tamoxifen for 5 years in 1045 women with stage I or II steroid receptor-positive breast cancer. At a median follow-up of 42 months, combination endocrine therapy showed a statistically significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with CMF (P.02), but there was no difference in survival. In the CMF group, those women who developed amenorrhea had significantly longer RFS and survival than those who did not. Indeed, the difference favoring combined endocrine therapy in this trial as opposed to the other four CMF trials summarized above may reflect in part a lower likelihood of becoming amenorrheic with six cycles of intravenous CMF compared with six cycles of oral CMF. The addition of tamoxifen to the ovarian ablation but not to the chemotherapy arm may also play an important role. Taken together, results from these five trials suggest that ovarian ablation with or without tamoxifen can provide clinical benefit similar to that seen with 6 months of oral CMF chemotherapy in women with lymph node-positive, receptor-positive breast cancer. In no case was tamoxifen administered to the women who received chemotherapy, a barrier to extrapolation of these results to current adjuvant therapy practices. In addition, given the apparent superiority of anthracycline-containing regimens compared with CMF in the adjuvant setting, a relevant question is whether similar results would be obtained in a comparison of anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy and ovarian ablation. This question has not been as well studied. One small French trial compared adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with ovarian ablation (oophorectomy or radiotherapy) plus tamoxifen in 162 premenopausal women with lymph node-positive, receptor-positive breast cancer (15). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS or survival in this trial, which stopped early because of poor accrual. A second trial, French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) 06, compared combined hormonal therapy with 3 years of tamoxifen and triptoreline (another investigational LHRH agonist) with six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) in 333 premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer involving one to three axillary lymph nodes. With a median follow-up of 54 months, DFS and overall survival were 92% and 97%, respectively, for endocrine therapy and 81% and 93%, respectively, for FEC. These apparent differences were not statistically significant. FEC induced amenorrhea in 42% of patients, a lower incidence than that seen with six cycles of oral CMF (16). Thus, although the available information is more limited, there does not appear to be a substantial difference in outcome for premenopausal women with receptor-positive, lymph node-positive breast cancer who were randomly assigned either to an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen or to ovarian ablation plus tamoxifen. ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND OVARIAN ABLATION Adjuvant chemotherapy is a routine part of care for many women with early-stage breast cancer. Thus, a major question is whether the use of ovarian ablation adds to the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy. This question was addressed in Intergroup (INT) 0101, a trial of chemohormonal therapy in 1503 premenopausal women with lymph node-positive, receptor-positive breast cancer. The trial compared three treatment arms: six cycles of oral CAF, six cycles of CAF followed by 5 years of goserelin (CAFZ), and six cycles of CAF followed by 5 years of goserelin and tamoxifen (CAFZT) (17). The 5-year DFS rates were 67% for CAF, 70% for CAFZ, and 77% for CAFZT, whereas 5-year survival was about 85% for all three arms. Comparison of CAFZT with CAFZ showed a statistically significant DFS advantage with the addition of tamoxifen, whereas comparison of CAFZ with CAF showed no DFS advantage for the addition of goserelin. Preliminary retrospective subset analyses suggest that addition of goserelin may be more beneficial in women younger than 40 years of age at trial entry those women least likely to become postmenopausal after chemotherapy. Final analysis of the impact of amenorrhea, patient age, and serum hormone levels on clinical outcome is in progress. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs No. 30,
4 The Zoladex in Premenopausal Patients (ZIPP) study also permitted assessment of the effects of ovarian ablation in the context of other adjuvant therapy (18,19). That study combined results from four trial groups that used a common 2 2factorial design to evaluate tamoxifen for 2 years, goserelin for 2 years, tamoxifen and goserelin for 2 years, and no endocrine therapy at all in 2648 premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer of any steroid receptor type. Forty-two percent of women had lymph node-positive disease, and 56% had ER-positive breast cancer. Elective adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted in selected patients according to predetermined plans at each center and was given to 43% of the participants. At a median follow-up of 4.2 years, there was a statistically significant 23% reduction in first events in women who received goserelin (first events in 20% of patients receiving goserelin and 25% of patients not receiving goserelin, P.001). The benefit was less pronounced in patients who received concurrent adjuvant tamoxifen or chemotherapy. There is no statistically significant effect on survival at this time (P.12). A third trial, International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) VIII, is evaluating whether the combination of CMF followed by goserelin can improve outcome compared with either modality alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. After surgery, patients are randomly assigned to receive either goserelin for 2 years or six cycles of oral CMF or six cycles of CMF followed by 1.5 years of goserelin. Accrual is complete, and the trial remains in blinded follow-up. Data addressing the value of ovarian ablation after chemotherapy are less robust than those comparing effects of ovarian ablation and chemotherapy. At present, however, they do not provide convincing evidence that both modalities should be routinely employed. OVARIAN ABLATION AND TAMOXIFEN For many years, tamoxifen was not used as adjuvant therapy for premenopausal women because of the belief that it was ineffective in these younger women. The 1995 EBCTG overview demonstrated that this belief was erroneous, because premenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer derived a substantial benefit from tamoxifen for 5 years. Unfortunately, virtually all adjuvant trials of ovarian ablation were begun before this fact became widely known. Thus, there is essentially no information from randomized trials about the relative effects of tamoxifen, ovarian ablation, or the combination in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Since tamoxifen has become a mainstay of the management of premenopausal women with receptor-positive breast cancer, this is a critical and unfortunate deficit. As noted above, INT 0101 showed that the addition of tamoxifen to CAFZ improved outcome in premenopausal women with lymph node-positive, receptor-positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, an arm comparing CAF followed by 5 years of tamoxifen is not available to permit direct assessment of CAFZ, CAFZT, and CAF followed by tamoxifen. Two trials are investigating ovarian ablation in the absence of chemotherapy. An Intergroup trial enrolled about 350 premenopausal women with lymph node-negative, receptor-positive breast cancer measuring less than 3 cm. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen for 5 years or tamoxifen for 5 years plus any form of ovarian ablation (surgery, radiation therapy, or LHRH agonist for 5 years). The trial was closed prematurely because of poor accrual in an era of increasing chemotherapy use, and it continues in blinded follow-up. A second trial of combined endocrine therapy has completed accrual in Vietnam. Over 700 premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer clinically have been randomly assigned to oophorectomy and 5 years of tamoxifen either at the time of mastectomy or at the time of relapse. Preliminary results of this trial suggest that adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen led to a statistically significant improvement in 5-year DFS and overall survival compared with initial observation. Only women with steroid receptor-positive tumors benefited from the adjuvant hormone therapy (20). CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS The results from the EBCTG meta-analysis suggest that ovarian ablation represents an effective form of adjuvant systemic therapy for premenopausal women. A number of randomized trials have shown that ovarian ablation with or without tamoxifen and standard chemotherapy regimens like CMF have similar benefits for premenopausal women with early-stage receptorpositive breast cancer. Thus, both the 2001 St. Gallen expert panel (21) and the 2000 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer (22) have suggested that ovarian ablation is a reasonable adjuvant treatment option for premenopausal women with receptor-positive breast cancer. It appears unlikely, however, that ovarian ablation has any benefit for women with receptornegative breast cancer. A number of questions remain to be answered. These include the following: 1) the importance of amenorrhea as a determinant for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer; 2) the optimal duration of ovarian ablation if an LHRH analogue is employed; 3) the value of ovarian ablation after chemotherapy, particularly for women who remain premenopausal after adjuvant chemotherapy; 4) the utility of combined hormone therapy such as ovarian ablation with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors; and 5) careful delineation of the long-term side effects of this endocrine approach. REFERENCES (1) Beatson GT. On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment. Lancet 1896;2:104 7, (2) Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Ovarian ablation in early breast cancer: overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1996;348: (3) Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;351: (4) Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998; 352: (5) Taylor CW, Green S, Dalton WS, Martino S, Rector D, Ingle JN, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of goserelin versus surgical ovariectomy in premenopausal patients with receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 1998;16: (6) Bines J, Oleske DM, Cobleigh MA. Ovarian function in premenopausal women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14: (7) Davidson NE. Ovarian ablation as treatment for young women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994;16:95 9. (8) Stone ER, Slack RS, Novielli A, Ellis M, Baidas S, et al. Rate of chemotherapy related amenorrhea (CRA) associated with adjuvant Adriamycin and Cytoxan (AC) and Adriamycin and Cytoxan followed by Taxol 70 Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs No. 30, 2001
5 (AC+T) in early stage breast cancer [abstract]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;64:61. (9) Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group and ICRF Breast Unit, Guy s Hospital, London. Adjuvant ovarian ablation versus CMF chemotherapy in premenopausal women with pathological stage II breast carcinoma: the Scottish trial. Lancet 1993;341: (10) Ejlertsen B, Dombernowsky P, Mouridsen HT, Kamby C, Kjaer M, Rose C, et al. Comparable effect of ovarian ablation (OA) and CMF chemotherapy in premenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients (PRP) [abstract]. Proc ASCO 1999;18:66a. (11) Jonat W. Zoladex (goserelin) vs. CMF as adjuvant therapy in pre/ perimenopausal early (node-positive) breast cancer: preliminary efficacy, QOL, and BMD results from the ZEBRA study [abstract]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;64:29. (12) Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Amoroso D, Mesiti M, Romeo D, Sismondi P, et al. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression as adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptorpositive pre-/perimenopausal breast cancer patients: results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2000;18: (13) Jakesz R, Hausmaninger H, Samonigg H, Kubista E, Depisch D, Fridrik M, et al. Comparison of adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin vs CMF in premenopausal stage I and II hormone-responsive breast cancer patients: four-year results of Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 5 [abstract]. Proc ASCO 1999;18:67a. (14) Jakesz R, Gnant M, Hausmaninger H, Samonigg H, Kubista E, Steindorfer P, et al. Combination goserelin and tamoxifen is more effective than CMF in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive tumors in a multicenter trial of the Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) [abstract]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;57:25. (15) Roché H, Mihura J, de Lafontan B, Reme-Saumon M, Martel P, Dubois JB, et al. Castration and tamoxifen versus chemotherapy (FAC) for premenopausal, node and receptor positive breast cancer patients: a randomized trial with a 7 years median follow-up [abstract]. Proc ASCO 1996;15:117. (16) Roché HH, Kerbrat P, Bonneterre J, Fargeot P, Fumoleau P, Monnier A, et al. Complete hormonal blockade versus chemotherapy in premenopausal early-stage breast cancer patients (Pts) with positive hormone-receptor (HR+) and 1 3 node-positive (N+) tumor, results of the FASG 06 trial [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2000;19:72a. (17) Davidson, N, O Neill A, Vukov A, Osborne CK, Martino S, White D, et al. Effect of chemohormonal therapy in premenopausal node (+) receptor (+) breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III Intergroup Trial (E5188, INT-0101) [abstract]. Proc ASCO 1999;18:67a. (18) Rutqvist LE. Zoladex and tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal breast cancer: a randomized trial by the Cancer Research Campaign (CRC) Breast Cancer Trials Group, the South-East Sweden Breast Cancer Group, Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group and the Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia (GIVIO) [abstract]. Proc ASCO 1999; 18:67a. (19) Baum M. Adjuvant treatment of premenopausal breast cancer with Zoladex and tamoxifen [abstract]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;57:30. (20) Love RR, Duc NB, Binh NG, Dinh NV, Allred CC, Mohsin SK, et al. Oophorectomy and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy in premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women with operable breast cancer [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2001;20:269. (21) Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Senn HJ. Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19: (22) Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. NIH Consensus Statement 2000 Nov 1 3;17:1 23. NOTE N. E. Davidson has previously received an unrestricted gift to support her research from AstraZeneca, Wilmingon, DE (maker of tamoxifen and goserelin), and she has served as a paid consultant for AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly (Indianapolis, IN). Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs No. 30,
Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
The Oncologist Breast Cancer What Is the Role of Ovarian Ablation in the Management of Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Today? TATIANA M. PROWELL, NANCY E. DAVIDSON Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive
More informationShould premenopausal HR+ve breast cancer receive LHRH?
Should premenopausal HR+ve breast cancer receive LHRH? Hesham Elghazaly, MD Prof. Clinical Oncology, Ain Shams University President of the BGICS Should premenopausal HR+ve breast cancer receive LHRH? NO?
More informationTHE ADJUVANT treatment of premenopausal patients with
Randomized Adjuvant Trial of Tamoxifen and Goserelin Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil: Evidence for the Superiority of Treatment With Endocrine Blockade in Premenopausal Patients
More informationMdi Medical Management of Breast Cancer Morbidity and Mortality Aug 13, 2009 Irina Kovatch, PGY3 Introduction Metastatic disease is the principal cause of death from breast cancer Metastatic events often
More informationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY R E V I E W A R T I C L E
NUMBER MARCH VOLUME 23 d 8 d 10 2005 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY R E V I E W A R T I C L E Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer Silvia Dellapasqua, Marco Colleoni,
More informationKey Words. Adjuvant therapy Breast cancer Taxanes Anthracyclines
The Oncologist Mayo Clinic Hematology/Oncology Reviews Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Recommendations for Management Based on Consensus Review and Recent Clinical Trials BETTY A. MINCEY, a,b FRANCES
More informationAdjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer
Adjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer Julie R. Gralow, M.D. Director, Breast Medical Oncology Jill Bennett Endowed Professor of Breast Cancer Professor, Global Health University of Washington
More information38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx. Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI %
38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI67 5-10% Question: What will you do now? 1. Give adjuvant chemotherapy 2. Send for Oncotype
More informationEndocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Breast Cancer. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology, PA US Oncology
Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology, PA US Oncology Ovarian Ablation or Suppression vs. Not in ER + or ER UK Breast Cancer
More informationA review of adjuvant hormonal therapy in
REVIEW Endocrine-Related Cancer (2004) 11 391 406 A review of adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer Kellie L Jones and Aman U Buzdar 1 Department of Pharmacy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer
More informationOPTIMAL ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN EARLY BREAST CANCER
OPTIMAL ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN EARLY BREAST CANCER STEPHEN E. JONES, M.D. US ONCOLOGY RESEARCH THE WOODLANDS, TX TOPICS PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER THE FUTURE TOPICS PREMENOPAUSAL
More informationBreast Cancer Update Irene Kuter. doi: /theoncologist
Breast Cancer Update Irene Kuter The Oncologist 2000, 5:285-292. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-285 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World
More informationAdjuvant treatment for early breast cancer
Annals of Oncology 16 (Supplement 2): ii182 ii187, 2005 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi709 Adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer I. Smith The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK Introduction Survival rates
More informationReview Endocrinology and hormone therapy in breast cancer Endocrine therapy in premenopausal women Kathleen Pritchard
Review Endocrinology and hormone therapy in breast cancer Endocrine therapy in premenopausal women Kathleen Pritchard Head, Clinical Trials and Epidemiology and Chair, Breast Cancer Site Group, Toronto
More informationUpdate from the 25th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium December 11 14, 2002
Update from the 25th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium December 11 14, 2002 Nearly 5,000 physicians, oncologists, radiologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists, and breast cancer advocates from
More informationUse of Ovarian Suppression and Ablation in Breast Cancer Treatment
Use of Ovarian Suppression and Ablation in Breast Cancer Treatment Dr Marina Parton Consultant Medical Oncologist Royal Marsden and Kingston Hospitals Overview Breast cancer phenotypes Use of ovarian manipulation
More informationBreast cancer has the highest incidence among those
Medical Treatment of Breast Cancer Young Seon Hong, M.D. Department of Internal Medicine Catholic University of Korea, St. Mary's Hospital E mail : y331@cmc.cuk.ac.kr Abstract Breast cancer has the highest
More informationAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology June , New Orleans
American Society of Clinical Oncology June 5-8 2004, New Orleans The 2004 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was held June 5 8 in New Orleans, Louisiana. This conference
More informationIntroduction. pissn , eissn Open Access. Original Article
pissn 1598-2998, eissn 25-9256 Cancer Res Treat. 216;48(4):1351-1362 Original Article http://dx.doi.org/1.4143/crt.215.444 Open Access Survival Outcome of Combined GnRH Agonist and Tamoxifen Is Comparable
More informationResearch Article Biological Characteristics and Medical Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Women A Featured Population: Results from the NORA Study
SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research International Breast Cancer Volume 2, Article ID 534256, 6 pages doi:.46/2/534256 Research Article Biological Characteristics and Medical Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young
More informationADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN AND LUTEINIZING HORMONE- RELEASING HORMONE AGONISTS IN PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER
From the DEPARTMENT OF ONCOLOGY-PATHOLOGY Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN AND LUTEINIZING HORMONE- RELEASING HORMONE AGONISTS IN PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER On long-term benefits
More informationCHEMOTHERAPY OF BREAST CANCER IN SERBIA DURING THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD ( ) - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
Archive of Oncology 2000;8(Suppl 1):7. SESSION 1 CHEMOTHERAPY OF BREAST CANCER IN SERBIA DURING THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD (1995-2000) - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS 7 Archive of Oncology 2000;8(Suppl 1):8. 8 Extended
More informationIt is a malignancy originating from breast tissue
59 Breast cancer 1 It is a malignancy originating from breast tissue including both early stages which are potentially curable, and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) which is usually incurable. Most breast
More informationJ Clin Oncol 23: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION
VOLUME 23 NUMBER 30 OCTOBER 20 2005 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY O R I G I N A L R E P O R T Retrospective Analysis of Time to Recurrence in the ATAC Trial According to Hormone Receptor Status: An Hypothesis-Generating
More informationImpact of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea on the prognosis of early breast cancer patients
Impact of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea on the prognosis of early breast cancer patients Hanaa M.Kohel, MD 1 ; Yousri A.Rostom, MD 2 ; Osama H.El-Zaafarany, MD 3 ; Hazem F.Elaakad, MD 4 (1)Medical Research
More informationImplications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers
日大医誌 75 (1): 10 15 (2016) 10 Original Article Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers Naotaka Uchida 1), Yasuki Matsui 1), Takeshi Notsu 1) and Manabu
More informationBreast Cancer Breast Managed Clinical Network
Initial Evaluation Clinical Stage Pre-Treatment Evaluation Treatment and pathological stage Less than 4 positive lymph nodes Adjuvant Treatment ER Positive HER2 Negative (see page 2 & 3 ) HER2 Positive
More informationIntroduction. pissn , eissn Open Access. Original Article
pissn 1598-2998, eissn 2005-9256 Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(1):55-63 Original Article http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.165 Open Access Ovarian Ablation Using Goserelin Improves Survival of Premenopausal
More informationS.C. Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera, Perugia, Italy; b. Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
This material is protected by U.S. Copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. For reprints contact: Reprints@AlphaMedPress.com Breast Cancer Breast Cancer: Achievements in Adjuvant Systemic
More informationSequential Dose-Dense Adjuvant Therapy With Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and Cyclophosphamide
Sequential Dose-Dense Adjuvant Therapy With Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and Cyclophosphamide Review Article [1] April 01, 1997 By Clifford A. Hudis, MD [2] The recognition of paclitaxel's (Taxol's) activity
More informationExtended Hormonal Therapy
Extended Hormonal Therapy Dr. Caroline Lohrisch, Medical Oncologist, BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre November 1, 2014 www.fpon.ca Optimal Endocrine Therapy for Women with Hormone Receptor Positive Early
More informationExtended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy After all, 5 years Tamoxifen works.. For women with ER+ primary breast cancer, previous studies have shown that treatment with tamoxifen for 5 years has a carry-over
More informationAdjuvant systemic therapies in women with operable breast cancer: A daily medical practice in a single institution
Turkish Journal of Cancer Volume 35, No.3, 2005 123 Adjuvant systemic therapies in women with operable breast cancer: A daily medical practice in a single institution B NNAZ DEM RKAN 1, LKNUR B LKAY GÖRKEM
More informationConsiderations in Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology
Considerations in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EBCTCG 2005/6 Overview Control Arms with No Systemic Treatment
More informationAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Goserelin Versus Either Modality Alone for Premenopausal Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Goserelin Versus Either Modality Alone for Premenopausal Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) 1 Background:
More informationTreatment Options for Breast Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Adjuvant and Metastatic Systemic Therapy
Women s Empowerment Cancer Advocacy Network (WE CAN) Conference Bucharest, Romania October 2015 Treatment Options for Breast Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Adjuvant and Metastatic Systemic
More informationCite this article as: BMJ, doi: /bmj f (published 13 January 2005)
Cite this article as: BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.38314.622095.8f (published 13 January 2005) 30 years follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study Gianni Bonadonna,
More informationBreast Cancer and Bone Loss. One in seven women will develop breast cancer during a lifetime
Breast Cancer and Bone Loss One in seven women will develop breast cancer during a lifetime Causes of Bone Loss in Breast Cancer Patients Aromatase inhibitors Bil Oophorectomy Hypogonadism Steroids Chemotherapy
More informationHORMONAL THERAPY IN ADJUVANT CARE
ADVANCES IN ENDOCRINE THERAPY FOR BREAST CANCER* Matthew J. Ellis, MD, PhD ABSTRACT Endocrine therapy is used frequently in breast cancer management, particularly in the setting of adjuvant care, but outstanding
More informationBREAST CANCER AND BONE HEALTH
BREAST CANCER AND BONE HEALTH Rowena Ridout, MD, FRCPC Toronto Western Hospital Osteoporosis Program University Health Network / Mount Sinai Hospital rowena.ridout@uhn.ca None to declare Conflicts of Interest
More informationBreast Cancer. Controversies in the Therapy of Early Stage Breast Cancer. The Oncologist 2005;10:
This material is protected by U.S. Copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. For reprints contact: Reprints@AlphaMedPress.com Breast Cancer Controversies in the Therapy of Early Stage Breast
More informationSOFTly: The Long Natural History of [Trials for] [premenopausal] ER+ Breast Cancer
SOFTly: The Long Natural History of [Trials for] [premenopausal] ER+ Breast Cancer Charles Moertel Lecture May 12, 2017 Gini Fleming Charles Moertel Founder of NCCTG Dedication to high quality clinical
More informationTRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 February 2006
The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION 15 February 2006 Taxotere 20 mg, concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion B/1 vial of Taxotere and 1 vial
More informationBest of San Antonio 2008
Best of San Antonio 2008 Ellie Guardino, MD/PhD Assistant Professor Stanford University BIG 1 98: a randomized double blind phase III study evaluating letrozole and tamoxifen given in sequence as adjuvant
More informationChemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea and Fertility in Women Undergoing Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer
Treatment-related morbidity and long-term sequelae related to chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea are assuming greater importance as the number of breast cancer survivors increases. Nancy Graves. Canoptic
More informationTerapia Hormonal da Paciente Premenopausa
I Congresso de Oncologia D Or 5 e 6 de julho de 2013 Terapia Hormonal da Paciente Premenopausa Antonio C. Wolff, MD, FACP, FASCO Professor de Oncologia Programa de Câncer de Mama Johns Hopkins University
More information03/14/2019. GnRH Analogs for Fertility Preservation: What are the Data? Educational Objectives. Outline
GnRH Analogs for Fertility Preservation: What are the Data? AHN-JH SKCCC Current Topics in Breast Cancer Symposium Karen Lisa Smith MD MPH Assistant Professor Johns Hopkins Breast and Cancer Program March
More informationUpdate from the 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
Update from the 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium The San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium is one of the most important breast cancer conferences. Approximately 8,000 physicians, oncologists,
More informationBreast Cancer? Breast cancer is the most common. What s New in. Janet s Case
Focus on CME at The University of Calgary What s New in Breast Cancer? Theresa Trotter, MD, FRCPC Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women in Canada, accounting for almost a third of
More informationEvolving Insights into Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology
Evolving Insights into Adjuvant Chemotherapy Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EBCTCG 2005/6 Overview Control Arms with No Systemic
More informationThe absolute benefit from chemotherapy for both older and younger patients appeared most significant in ER-negative populations.
Hello, my name is Diane Hecht, and I am a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. It s my pleasure to talk to you today about the role of chemotherapy in this
More informationAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients
Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients www.agoonline.de
More informationCopyright, 1995, by the Massachusetts Medical Society
Copyright, 99, by the Massachusetts Medical Society Volume 332 APRIL 6, 99 Number ADJUVANT CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL IN NODE- POSITIVE BREAST CANCER The Results of Years of Follow-up
More informationORMONOTERAPIA ADIUVANTE: QUALE LA DURATA OTTIMALE? MARIANTONIETTA COLOZZA
ORMONOTERAPIA ADIUVANTE: QUALE LA DURATA OTTIMALE? MARIANTONIETTA COLOZZA THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HORMONE RECEPTOR- POSITIVE BREAST CANCER IS VERY LONG Recurrence hazard rate 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 ER+ (n=2,257)
More informationAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients
Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients Version 2002: Scharl
More informationRelative dose intensity delivered to patients with early breast cancer: Canadian experience
M E D I C A L O N C O L O G Y Relative dose intensity delivered to patients with early breast cancer: Canadian experience S. Raza MD, S. Welch MD, and J. Younus MD ABSTRACT Adjuvant chemotherapy for early
More informationClinical Management Guideline for Breast Cancer
Initial Evaluation Clinical Stage Pre-Treatment Evaluation Treatment and pathological stage Adjuvant Treatment Less than 4 positive lymph nodes ER Positive HER2 Negative (see page 2 & 3 ) Primary Diagnosis:
More informationEarly Stage Disease. Hope S. Rugo, MD Professor of Medicine Director Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
SABCS 2014: Early Stage Disease Hope S. Rugo, MD Professor of Medicine Director Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center Topics for Discussion Chemotherapy plus 10
More informationClinical Expert Submission Template
Clinical Expert Submission Template Thank you for agreeing to give us a personal statement on your view of the technology and the way it should be used in the NHS. Health care professionals can provide
More informationOncotype DX testing in node-positive disease
Should gene array assays be routinely used in node positive disease? Yes Christy A. Russell, MD University of Southern California Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease 1 Validity of the Oncotype
More informationAdjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer
Bnmh Mahcal Bullilm (1991) Vol 47, No. 2, pp. 343-356 The Brmth Council 1991 Adjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer H J Stewart The Scottish Cancer Trials Office (MRC), The Medical School,
More informationChoosing between different hormonal therapies. Rudy Van den Broecke UZ Ghent
Choosing between different hormonal therapies Rudy Van den Broecke UZ Ghent What is the golden standard in premenopausal hormonal sensitive early breast cancer? Ovarian Suppression alone 5 years Tamoxifen
More informationNadia Harbeck Breast Center University of Cologne, Germany
Evidence in Favor of Taxane Based Combinations and No Anthracycline in Adjuvant and Metastatic Settings Nadia Harbeck Breast Center University of Cologne, Germany Evidence in Favor of Taxane Based Combinations
More informationStudy Of Letrozole Extension. Coordinating Group IBCSG IBCSG BIG 1-07
tudy Of Letrozole Extension Coordinating Group IBCSG IBCSG 35-07 BIG 1-07 A phase III trial evaluating the role of continuous letrozole versus intermittent letrozole following 4 to 6 years of prior adjuvant
More informationPrognostic Value of Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea in Breast Cancer: a Meta-Analysis
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.14.5939 Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea in Breast Cancer: a Meta-Analysis RESEARCH ARTICLE Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea
More informationWhat is new in HR+ Breast Cancer? Olivia Pagani Breast Unit and Institute of oncology of Southern Switzerland
What is new in HR+ Breast Cancer? Olivia Pagani Breast Unit and Institute of oncology of Southern Switzerland Outline Early breast cancer Advanced breast cancer Open questions Outline Early breast cancer
More informationLessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. Mike Dixon Clinical Director Breakthrough Research Unit Edinburgh
Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Mike Dixon Clinical Director Breakthrough Research Unit Edinburgh 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant
More informationLessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Lesson 1
Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Mike Dixon Clinical Director Breakthrough Research Unit Edinburgh 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant
More informationIs adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for Luminal A-like breast cancer?
JBUON 2018; 23(4): 877-882 ISSN: 1107-0625, online ISSN: 2241-6293 www.jbuon.com E-mail: editorial_office@jbuon.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for Luminal A-like breast cancer?
More informationDelayed adjuvant tamoxifen: Ten-year results of a collaborative randomized controlled trial in early breast cancer (TAM-02 trial)
Annals of Oncology 11: 515-519, 2000. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Original article Delayed adjuvant tamoxifen: Ten-year results of a collaborative randomized controlled
More informationPMRT for N1 breast cancer :CONS. Won Park, M.D., Ph.D Department of Radiation Oncology Samsung Medical Center
PMRT for N1 breast cancer :CONS Won Park, M.D., Ph.D Department of Radiation Oncology Samsung Medical Center DBCG 82 b & c Overgaard et al Radiot Oncol 2007 1152 pln(+), 8 or more nodes removed Systemic
More informationBreast Cancer Basics. Clinical Oncology for Public Health Professionals. Ben Ho Park, MD, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationNIH Public Access Author Manuscript Nat Rev Clin Oncol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 December 10.
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Clin Oncol. ; 9(4): 223 229. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.21. Use of neoadjuvant data to design adjuvant endocrine therapy trials
More informationChemotherapy of Breast Cancer
Japan - Taiwan Joint Symposium on Medical Oncology Session 7 Breast cancer journal homepage:www.cos.org.tw/web/index.asp Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer Mei-Ching Liu Department of Medicine, Koo Foundation
More informationEvolving Practices in Breast Cancer Management
Evolving Practices in Breast Cancer Management The Georgia Tumor Registrars Association 2016 Priscilla R. Strom, MD, FACS Objectives 1. understand newer indications for neoadjuvant treatment 2. understand
More informationADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY and endocrine therapy
Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Chemotherapy Added to Tamoxifen in Patients With Receptor-Positive and Lymph Node Positive Breast Cancer By R. Jakesz, H. Hausmaninger, K. Haider, E. Kubista, H. Samonigg,
More informationESMO Breast Cancer Preceptorship Singapore November Special Issues in Treatment of Young Women with Breast Cancer
ESMO Breast Cancer Preceptorship Singapore November 2017 Special Issues in Treatment of Young Women with Breast Cancer Prudence Francis MD Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Australia Conflict of
More informationLong Term Toxicity of Endocrine Therapy for premenopausal women with ER positive breast cancer
Global Breast Cancer Conference 2017 21 st Apr, 2017@Chezu Island Long Term Toxicity of Endocrine Therapy for premenopausal women with ER positive breast cancer Shinji Ohno, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S. Breast
More informationTrial: Take-Home Message: Executive Summary: Guidelines:
Trial: Davies C, et al. "Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomized trial".
More informationAdjuvant Therapy for Very Young Women With Breast Cancer: Need for Tailored Treatments
Adjuvant Therapy for Very Young Women With Breast Cancer: Need for Tailored Treatments Aron Goldhirsch, Richard D. Gelber, Greg Yothers, Robert J. Gray, Stephanie Green, John Bryant, Shari Gelber, Monica
More informationScottish Medicines Consortium
Scottish Medicines Consortium anastrozole 1mg tablets (Arimidex ) No. (198/05) AstraZeneca UK Ltd New indication: for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptorpositive early invasive
More informationBreast-conserving therapy (BCT), in which surgery is restricted to
688 Effect of Breast-Conserving Therapy versus Radical on Prognosis for Young Women with Breast Carcinoma Niels Kroman, M.D. 1 3 Helle Holtveg, M.D. 4 Jan Wohlfahrt, M.Sc. 1 Maj-Britt Jensen, M.Sc. 2 Henning
More informationWilliam J. Gradishar MD
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy For Postmenopausal Women SOBO 2013 William J. Gradishar MD Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology Director, Maggie Daley
More informationJournal of Breast Cancer
REVIEW ARTICLE Journal of Breast Cancer J Breast Cancer 2016 December; 19(4): 341-348 Role of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Woo-Chan Park Department of Surgery,
More information8/8/2011. PONDERing the Need to TAILOR Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ Node Positive Breast Cancer. Overview
Overview PONDERing the Need to TAILOR Adjuvant in ER+ Node Positive Breast Cancer Jennifer K. Litton, M.D. Assistant Professor The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Using multigene assay
More informationRecent advances in adjuvant systemic treatment for breast cancer: all systems go!
REVIEW ARTICLE Recent advances in adjuvant systemic treatment for breast cancer: all systems go! P.N. Fishman MD* and S. Verma MD MSEd* KEY WORDS Breast cancer, adjuvant, treatment 1. INTRODUCTION Breast
More informationAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy: How Long is Long Enough?
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: How Long is Long Enough? Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts hburstein@partners.org I have no conflicts to
More informationSee Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.
Clinical Policy: (Verzenio) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.355 Effective Date: 10.24.17 Last Review Date: 02.19 Line of Business: Commercial, Medicaid Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this
More informationSeigo Nakamura,M.D.,Ph.D.
Seigo Nakamura,M.D.,Ph.D. Professor of Surgery Director of Breast Center Showa University Hospital Chairman of the board of directors Japan Breast Cancer Society Inhibition of Estrogen-Dependent Growth
More informationHormone therapy in Breast Cancer patients with comorbidities
Hormone therapy in Breast Cancer patients with comorbidities Diana Crivellari Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano- ITALY Madrid November 9th, 2007 Main issues Comorbidities in elderly women Hormonal
More informationYukinori Ozaki 1 Yuko Tanabe 1 Nobuko Tamura 2 Takuya Ogura 2 Chihiro Kondoh 1 Yuji Miura 1 Kenichi Yoshimura 3 Hidetaka Kawabata 2 Toshimi Takano 1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0836-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Impact on disease free survival of the duration of ovarian function suppression, as postoperative adjuvant therapy, in premenopausal women with
More informationToxicities of Chemotherapy Regimens used in Early Breast Cancer
Toxicities of Chemotherapy Regimens used in Early Breast Cancer CERCIT Workshop February 17, 2012 Carlos H Barcenas, M.D., M.S. Fellow Hematology-Oncology MD Anderson Cancer Center CERCIT Scholar Outline
More informationYung-Chang Lin 1, Shin-Cheh Chen 2, Hsien-Kun Chang 1, Swei Hsueh 3, Chien-Sheng Tsai 4, Yung-Feng Lo 2, Tsann-Long Hwang 2 and Miin-Fu Chen 2
Identifying Good Prognosis Group of Breast Cancer Patients with 1 3 Positive Axillary Nodes for Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil (CMF) Chemotherapy Yung-Chang Lin 1, Shin-Cheh
More informationBREAST CANCER. Dawn Hershman, MD MS. Medicine and Epidemiology Co-Director, Breast Program HICCC Columbia University Medical Center.
BREAST CANCER Dawn Hershman, MD MS Florence Irving Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Co-Director, Breast Program HICCC Columbia University Medical Center Background Breast cancer is the
More informationAdjuvant bisphosphonates: our recommendations
Adjuvant bisphosphonates: our recommendations Andreas Makris Mount Vernon Cancer Centre OPTIMA launch meeting, 27 April 2017 Breast Cancer Metastasis Tumour cell colonisation of bone Tumour cell proliferation
More informationPatients preferences for adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: what makes it worthwhile?
British Journal of Cancer (2005) 93, 1319 1323 All rights reserved 0007 0920/05 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com Patients preferences for adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: what makes it worthwhile?
More informationAdjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer
Journal of BUON 10: 175-180, 2005 2005 Zerbinis Medical Publications. Printed in Greece REVIEW ARTICLE Adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer S. Bešlija Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology,
More informationLuminal early breast cancer: (neo-) adjuvant endocrine therapy
CAMPUS GROSSHADERN CAMPUS INNENSTADT KLINIK UND POLIKLINIK FÜR FRAUENHEILKUNDE UND GEBURTSHILFE DIREKTOR: PROF. DR. MED. SVEN MAHNER Luminal early breast cancer: (neo-) adjuvant endocrine therapy Nadia
More informationATAC Trial. 10 year median follow-up data. Approval Code: AZT-ARIM-10005
ATAC Trial 10 year median follow-up data Approval Code: AZT-ARIM-10005 Background FDA post-approval commitment analysis to update DFS, TTR, OS and Safety Prof. Jack Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists
More information