Soleus 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml. Tibialis posterior 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Total 300 (24 ml) 0 (24 ml) 300 (24 ml) Dose: U (solution volume)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Soleus 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml. Tibialis posterior 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Total 300 (24 ml) 0 (24 ml) 300 (24 ml) Dose: U (solution volume)"

Transcription

1 Study No.: BTX Title: A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Post-Stroke lower Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, -Controlled GSK Treatment Followed by an Open-Label GSK Treatment Rationale: This was a confirmatory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSK (botulinum toxin type A, BTX) in subjects with post-stroke lower limb spasticity. This study was designed and conducted based on advice and comments from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) raised during the PMDA consultation meeting on September 1, Phase: III Study Period: May 22, 2007 to December 26, 2008 Study Design: The evaluation period consists of two parts: the double-blind (DB) phase followed by the open-label (OL) phase. Part 1 (DB phase): A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled Part 2 (OL phase): A multicenter, uncontrolled, open-label The study period was from the time of obtaining informed consent to the completion of OL phase or the time of withdrawal, consisting of the screening phase up to 4 weeks and the evaluation period of 48 weeks (12-week DB phase and 36-week OL phase) for a maximum of 52 weeks. Centres: A total of 19 medical institutions in Japan Indication: post-stroke lower limb spasticity Treatment: [Investigational product] BTX: Each vial contained the following ingredients and was reconstituted before use: botulinum toxin type A, 100 Unit (U); human serum albumin, 0.5 mg; sodium chloride, 0.9 mg. (Control) : Each vial (unidentifiable from the investigational product) contained the following ingredients and was reconstituted before use; Sodium chloride, 0.9 mg. BTX or placebo was administered by intramuscular injection into 3 sites of each the gastrocnemius (medial and lateral), soleus and tibialis posterior muscles (i.e. muscles primarily involved in equinus symptoms) as specified in the table below (the BTX group [ group] and the placebo group).a single treatment of BTX or placebo was given in the DB phase, and up to 3 repeated treatments of BTX were given in the OL phase. Muscle DB phase OL phase Gastro-cnemius Medial 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Lateral 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Soleus 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml Tibialis posterior 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Total 300 (24 ml) 0 (24 ml) 300 (24 ml) Dose: U (solution volume) During the DB phase, the investigator (or sub-investigator) used an EMG or nerve stimulator, and an EMG needle to assist in proper muscle localization for injection. During the OL phase, the investigator (or sub-investigator) chose whether an EMG or nerve stimulator and an EMG needle were used to localize the muscle for injection. The subjects were re-administered whenever they met all of the following re-administration criteria: 1. Ankle flexor muscle tone of >= 2 on the MAS at pre-treatment. 2. At least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection. 3. Body weight of >= 50 kg. Objectives: To confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of BTX 300 U over placebo in subjects with equinus deformity (plantar flexion of the ankle) associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: An area under the curve (AUC) for the change from baseline in MAS ankle score in the DB phase. Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): 1

2 1. Throughout the evaluation period (DB and OL phases): Change from baseline in MAS ankle score, change from baseline in physician s rati ng scale (PRS) score, and change from baseline in clinical global impression (CGI) of functional disability. 2. If any change was made to permissible concomitant rehabilitation therapy during the OL phase: global impression of therapeutic benefit of BTX to rehabilitation. Statistical Methods: [Efficacy analysis methods] The full analysis set (FAS) was the primary population for efficacy analyses. The FAS consisted of all subjects randomized with the exception of those who did not receive any injection of the investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score. For the primary efficacy endpoint (AUC for the change from baseline in MAS ankle score in the DB phase), a mean difference between the and placebo groups was analysed by t- test. If the p value was less than the two-sided significance level of 5%, the superiority of BTX 300 U over placebo was considered to be confirmed. Also a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference between the two groups were calculated. For the secondary efficacy endpoints, the following analyses were performed: 1. MAS ankle score, PRS score, speed of gait and CGI score at each visit during the DB phase were summarized by treatment group using summary statistics and frequency tabulations. The changes from baseline in these variables at each follow-up visit after the injection were summarized by treatment group and mean differences between the and placebo groups was analysed by Wilcoxon test. 2. During the OL phase the variables mentioned above 1 were summarized with summary statistics up to 12 weeks after each repeated injection of BTX 300 U (first, second and third repeated injections) for each group in the DB phase and overall (combined treatment groups). The baseline (Visit 2) was used to calculate the change from baseline during the OL phase. 3. The presence or absence of any change to rehabilitation during the OL phase and if any change to rehabilitation was made, the global impression of therapeutic benefit of BTX to rehabilitation was summarized for each group in the DB phase and overall. [Safety analyses] The safety population (SP) was used for safety analyses. The SP consisted of all subjects who received at least one injection of the investigational product. The analyses of adverse events (AEs) during the OL phase use of the subgroup of the SP consisting subjects who received at least one injection of the investigational product during the OL phase. AEs were grouped by System Organ Class (SOC), Preferred Term (PT), severity, and relationship to the investigational product. The number (%) of subjects with AEs was summarized separately in the DB phase and OL phase. For clinical laboratory data, pulse rate, blood pressure, body weight, 12-lead ECG findings, summary statistics were calculated by treatment group and timepoint. Study Population: This study enrolled male or female subjects with equinus deformity (plantar flexion of the ankle) who met all of the following criteria at baseline (Visit 2): between 20 and 80 years of old; body weight of at least 50 kg; at least 6 months post stroke; and MAS ankle score of >= 3. Subjects with any of the following were excluded from the study: bilateral hemiplegia or quadriplegia; fixed contractures of the ankle (absence of range of motion); profound atrophy of the muscles to be injected; or previous botulinum toxin therapy. Number of Subjects: Planned, N Randomised, N DB phase completed, n (%) 52 (90) 61 (98) Withdrawn in the DB phase, n (%) 6 (10) 1 (2) Adverse Events 3 (5) 0 Protocol Violation 0 1 (2) Subject decided to withdraw from 3 (5) 0 2

3 study Study completed, n (%) 45 (78) 52 (84) Withdrawn in the OL phase, n (%) 7 (12) 9 (15) Adverse Events 1 (2) 6 (10) Subject decided to withdraw from 6 (10) 2 (3) study Other, specify 0 1 (2) Demographics: N (FAS/SP) Females: Males 8: 50 16: 46 Mean Age, years (SD) 62.4 (8.66) 62.5 (9.32) < 60 year, n (%) 16 (28) 19 (31) >= 60 year, n (%) 42 (72) 43 (69) Asian - Japanese, n (%) 58 (100) 62 (100) Primary Efficacy Results: AUC for Change from Baseline in MAS Ankle Score (Up to 12 weeks after the Injection in the DB Phase) (N=58) Mean (SD) (6.6904) (6.6496) Mean Difference between Treatments % Confidence Interval , p-value Secondary Outcome Variable(s): 1. Changes from Baseline in Secondary Outcome Variables by Treatment Cycle (Up to 12 weeks after the Injection) DB phase (N=58) OL phase 300U to 300U (n=50) to 300U (n=57) MAS ankle score Baseline, Mean (SD) 3.28 (0.451) 3.24 (0.432) DB phase 1 st treatment ~ ~ OL phase 2 nd treatment ~ ~ rd treatment ~ ~ th treatment ~ ~ PRS score Baseline, Mean (SD) 3.10 (2.352) 3.23 (2.020) DB phase 1 st treatment ~ ~ OL phase 2 nd treatment ~ ~ rd treatment ~ ~ th treatment ~ ~ Speed of Gait (Time [sec] to Walk 10 m) Baseline, Mean (SD) (49.688) (51.563) DB phase 1 st treatment ~ ~ OL phase 2 nd treatment ~ ~ rd treatment ~ ~ th treatment ~ ~ CGI of functional disability (by investigator) Baseline, Mean (SD) (1.690) (1.783) DB phase 1 st treatment ~ ~

4 OL phase 2 nd treatment ~ ~ rd treatment ~ ~ th treatment ~ ~ CGI of functional disability (by subject) Baseline, Mean (SD) (1.890) (2.051) DB phase 1 st treatment ~ ~ OL phase 2 nd treatment ~ ~ rd treatment ~ ~ th treatment ~ ~ CGI of functional disability (by physiotherapist/occupational therapist) Baseline, Mean (SD) (1.996) (2.044) DB phase 1 st treatment ~ ~ OL phase 2 nd treatment ~ ~ rd treatment ~ ~ th treatment ~ ~ Global impression of therapeutic benefit of BTX to rehabilitation Changed Rehabilitation in the OL 13 (27) 10 (18) phase, n(%) Considered Benefit of BTX to 13 (100) 8 (80) Rehabilitation, n (% of n Changed Rehabilitation) Safety Results: Adverse Events - On-Therapy 1. Adverse Events Reported by Two or More Subjects in Group in the DB phase (N=58) Subjects with any AE(s), n(%) 26 (45) 27 (44) Nasopharyngitis 8 (14) 12 (19) Myalgia 3 (5) 2 (3) Injection site pain 3 (5) 1 (2) Eczema 2 (3) 1 (2) Angina pectoris 2 (3) 0 2. Adverse Events Reported by 3% or More Subjects in Total in the OL phase 300U to 300U to (n=50) 300U Total (N=107) (n=57) Subjects with any AE(s), n(%) 35 (70) 40 (70) 75 (70) Nasopharyngitis 15 (30) 6 (11) 21 (20) Contusion 5 (10) 4 (7) 9 (8) Eczema 3 (6) 3 (5) 6 (6) Arthralgia 1 (2) 3 (5) 4 (4) Back pain 2 (4) 2 (4) 4 (4) Tinea pedis 3 (6) 0 3 (3) Muscle spasms 3 (6) 0 3 (3) Myalgia 3 (6) 0 3 (3) Pyrexia 3 (6) 0 3 (3) Constipation 2 (4) 1 (2) 3 (3) Upper respiratory tract inflammation 2 (4) 1 (2) 3 (3) Gait disturbance 1 (2) 2 (4) 3 (3) Blood creatine phosphokinase 1 (2) 2 (4) 3 (3) increased Hepatic function abnormal 1 (2) 2 (4) 3 (3) 4

5 Urinary tract infection 0 3 (5) 3 (3) Serious Adverse Events - On-Therapy,n (%) [n considered to be related to the investigational product by the investigator] 1. Serious Adverse Events in the DB phase (N=58) Subjects with non-fatal SAEs, n (%) 5 (9) [1] 1 (2) [0] Angina pectoris 2 (3) [0] 0 Gastric ulcer haemorrhage 1 (2) [0] 0 Fibula fracture 1 (2) [0] 0 Myalgia 1 (2) [1] 0 Convulsion 0 1 (2) [0] Subjects with fatal SAEs, n (%) Serious Adverse Events in the OL Phase 300U to 300U (n=50) to 300U (n=57) Total (N=107) Subjects with non-fatal SAEs, n (%) 3 (6) [0] 8 (14) [0] 11 (10) [0] Epilepsy 1 (2) [0] 0 1 (<1) [0] Depression 1 (2) [0] 0 1 (<1) [0] Gastroenteritis 1 (2) [0] 0 1 (<1) [0] Facial bones fracture 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Femoral neck fracture 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Femur fracture 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Spinal compression fracture 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Convulsion 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Mania 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Colonic polyp 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Gastric polyps 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Calculus ureteric 0 1 (2) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Subjects with fatal SAEs, n (%) Conclusion: The treatment of BTX 300U injection intramuscular to lower limb improved the spasticity, and the improvement continued for about 3 months after the injection. 5

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study Study No.: ADF105220 Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil () tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study against lamivudine ()- Rationale: This study wass a confirmatory

More information

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

HM2008/00566/00. study and to obtain clinical experience with the use of this drug. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): <Pharmacokinetics>

HM2008/00566/00. study and to obtain clinical experience with the use of this drug. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): <Pharmacokinetics> The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The Function Effect of Botulimun Toxin A (BtX-A) at the Calf Muscle in Lower Limb Lengthening Dong Hoon Lee, MD, Ph.D, Keun Jung Ryu MD

The Function Effect of Botulimun Toxin A (BtX-A) at the Calf Muscle in Lower Limb Lengthening Dong Hoon Lee, MD, Ph.D, Keun Jung Ryu MD The Function Effect of Botulimun Toxin A (BtX-A) at the Calf Muscle in Lower Limb Lengthening Dong Hoon Lee, MD, Ph.D, Keun Jung Ryu MD Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction Service Department of Orthopaedic

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI) PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.

More information

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres). Drug product: Symbicort Turbuhaler Drug substance(s): ST (Symbicort Turbuhaler ) Edition No.: 1.0 Study code: D5890C00010 Date: 15 March 2007 SYNOPSIS An 8-week, randomised, double blind, parallel-group,

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study. The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Treatment Framework patient tracker

Treatment Framework patient tracker Treatment Framework patient tracker Utilize the BOTOX Treatment Framework when evaluating your Focal Spasticity patients to establish The right goals The right muscles/dose The right plan Use the following

More information

Title of Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Galantamine in Patients With Dementia of Alzheimer's Type Who Failed to Benefit From Donepezil

Title of Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Galantamine in Patients With Dementia of Alzheimer's Type Who Failed to Benefit From Donepezil SYNOPSIS Name of Sponsor/Company Name of Finished Product REMINYL Name of Active Ingredient(s) Galantamine hydrobromide Issue Date: 18 October 2013 Protocol No.: Title of Study: Evaluation of Efficacy

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis

Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health Trial record 1 of 1 for: CZOL446H2409 Previous Study Return to List Next Study Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Combination Therapy in Women With

More information

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. Please note that the results reported in any single trial may not reflect the overall

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. Please note that the results reported in any single trial may not reflect the overall

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. Please note that the results reported in any single trial may not reflect the overall

More information

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1 Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1 Sponsor Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name Therapeutic Area of Trial Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Approved Indication Treatment of major depressive

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Study No.: 29060/717 Title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Fixed-Dose Study of CR Intermittent Dosing (12.5 mg and 25 mg) for Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Rationale: In most trials investigating

More information

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Study Coordinator. Study centre(s)

SYNOPSIS. Study Coordinator. Study centre(s) Drug product: Seroquel Drug substance(s): Quetiapine Document No.: 1 Edition No.: 1 Study code: D1449C00005 Date: 02 January 2007 SYNOPSIS A Randomized, Parallel Group, Open Trial Examining the Safety,

More information

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ CT Registry ID# 7029 Page 1 Summary ID#7029 Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ Clinical Study Report: Versus Divalproex and Placebo in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Mania Associated with Bipolar

More information

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305 Title of Study: A 52-Week, Open-Label, Long-Term Treatment Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of BEMA Buprenorphine in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain Coordinating Investigator: Martin

More information

Analysis of safety The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort.

Analysis of safety The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort. The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Studies listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers). Drug product: Drug substance(s): Document No.: Edition No.: Study code: Date: SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 µg Budesonide/formoterol SD-039-0725 17 February 2005 SYNOPSIS A Twelve-Week, Randomized, Double-blind,

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Study No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Studies listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab R&D/04/118. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab R&D/04/118. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: 2.0 Synopsis Abbott Laboratories Name of Study Drug: Adalimumab Name of Active Ingredient: Adalimumab Title of Study: Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page: (For National Authority

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Studies listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template Full Novartis CTRD Results Template Sponsor Novartis Generic Drug Name vildagliptin Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes Protocol Number CLAF237A23138E1 Title A

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: he study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1) Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1) salmeterol/fluticasone propionate () (mcg strength) bd via DISKUS/ACCUHALER

More information

Study Center(s): The study was conducted at 39 study sites in Japan.

Study Center(s): The study was conducted at 39 study sites in Japan. SYNOPSIS Issue Date: 20 NOVEMBER 2012 Name of Sponsor/Company Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K. Name of Finished Product CONCERTA Name of Active Ingredient(s) Methylphenidate HCl Protocol No.: JNS001-JPN-A01

More information

1.0 Abstract. Title. Keywords. Adalimumab, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Effectiveness, Safety. Rationale and Background

1.0 Abstract. Title. Keywords. Adalimumab, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Effectiveness, Safety. Rationale and Background 1.0 Abstract Title Assessment of the safety of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients showing rapid progression of structural damage of the joints, who have no prior history of treatment with

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Periods: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Periods: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

5.5.2 Lower-Limb Spasticity following Stroke

5.5.2 Lower-Limb Spasticity following Stroke 5.5.2 Lower-Limb Spasticity following Stroke Evidence Tables and References Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care 2011-2013 Update Last Updated: June 25 th, 2013 Contents Search Strategy...

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: GSK Medicine: abacavir (ABC)/dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) Study Number: 201147 Title: A IIIb, randomized, open-label study of the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of switching to a fixed-dose

More information

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI) PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

CENTENE PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS NEW DRUG REVIEW 3Q17 July August

CENTENE PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS NEW DRUG REVIEW 3Q17 July August BRAND NAME Radicava GENERIC NAME edaravone MANUFACTURER MT Pharma America, Inc. DATE OF APPROVAL May 5, 2017 PRODUCT LAUNCH DATE May 5, 2017 REVIEW TYPE Review type 1 (RT1): New Drug Review Full review

More information

I.V. CR845 Adaptive Phase 2/3 Post Operative Pain Study Results

I.V. CR845 Adaptive Phase 2/3 Post Operative Pain Study Results I.V. CR845 Adaptive Phase 2/3 Post Operative Pain Study Results A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Adaptive Design Study Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of I.V. CR845

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary-

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary- The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Secondary efficacy endpoints for Part 2, the Eltrombopag-Only Period, included the proportion of subjects who

Secondary efficacy endpoints for Part 2, the Eltrombopag-Only Period, included the proportion of subjects who The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variables:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variables: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS (PROTOCOL WX17796)

SYNOPSIS (PROTOCOL WX17796) TITLE OF THE STUDY A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter, 52-week trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunct MMF to achieve remission with reduced

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Date of Report: 25-Mar Database as of: 05-Mar-2008

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Date of Report: 25-Mar Database as of: 05-Mar-2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Date of Report: 25-Mar-2008 Database as of: 05-Mar-2008 Title of Study: Protocol : A Phase II, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Response Study to Evaluate

More information

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE. Drug product: Drug substance(s): Document No.: Edition No.: 1 Study code: Accolate Zafirlukast (ZD9188) 9188IL/0138 Date: 02 May 2007 SYNOPSIS A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, -controlled, Parallel

More information

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1 Sponsor Novartis Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes Study Number CLMF237A2309

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Review Report. Inavir Dry Powder Inhaler 20 mg

Review Report. Inavir Dry Powder Inhaler 20 mg Review Report June 27, 2016 Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency The following are the results of a review of the following pharmaceutical product submitted for marketing approval conducted by the

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Fluvastatin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Dyslipidemia

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Fluvastatin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Dyslipidemia Page 1 Sponsor Novartis Generic Drug Name Fluvastatin Therapeutic Area of Trial Dyslipidemia Approved Indication Therapeutic area and approved indications in Germany: Hypercholesterolemia (HC), combined

More information

B3D-MC-GHCY Clinical Study Report Synopsis Page 1Page GHCY Synopsis LY

B3D-MC-GHCY Clinical Study Report Synopsis Page 1Page GHCY Synopsis LY B3DMCGHCY Clinical Study Report Page 1Page 1 2. GHCY B3DMCGHCY Clinical ClinicalStudy StudyReport Report Page 2Page 2 Clinical Study Report : Study B3DMCGHCY Title of Study: The Effect of Teriparatide

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis Report Synopsis Study Title: A Randomized, Multicenter, 10-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled, Flexible-Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Paroxetine in Children and Adolescents with

More information

The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type-A on Spasticity and Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy

The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type-A on Spasticity and Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy Pacific University CommonKnowledge PT Critically Appraised Topics School of Physical Therapy 2014 The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type-A on Spasticity and Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods:

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: This drug is not marketed in the United States.

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: This drug is not marketed in the United States. PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.

More information

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. abcd Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. The synopsis

More information

Study No.: 49653/020 Title: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of

Study No.: 49653/020 Title: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Study No.: 49653/020 Title: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rosiglitazone vs. Glibenclamide Therapy, When Administered

More information

Study Number CAIN457C2302 (core study) and CAIN457C2302E1 (extension study)

Study Number CAIN457C2302 (core study) and CAIN457C2302E1 (extension study) Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1 Sponsor Novartis Generic Drug Name Secukinumab Therapeutic Area of Trial Uveitis Approved Indication Investigational Study Number CC2302 (core study) and CC2302E1

More information

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Elements of Provider Documentation Consistent with Medicare Guidelines

Elements of Provider Documentation Consistent with Medicare Guidelines S T R E A M L I N E Elements of Provider Documentation Consistent with Medicare Guidelines 1 Document medical necessity Include a statement that BOTOX (onabotulinumtoxina) treatment is reasonable and necessary

More information

GSK Medication: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medication: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Clinical Study Synopsis

Clinical Study Synopsis Clinical Study Synopsis This Clinical Study Synopsis is provided for patients and healthcare professionals to increase the transparency of Bayer's clinical research. This document is not intended to replace

More information

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT# Clinical Trial Synopsis, NCT#00762736 Title of Study: A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study Population: 12 years and older A EF Calcipotriene Foam, 0.005%

Study Population: 12 years and older A EF Calcipotriene Foam, 0.005% Study No.: CAL.203 Title: A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess the Bioavailability of Emulsion Formulation Foam, 0.005%, and Dovonex, 0.005%, in Patients with Mild to Moderate Plaque-Type Psoriasis

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

10/26/2017. Comprehensive & Coordinated Orthopaedic Management of Children with CP. Objectives. It s all about function. Robert Bruce, MD Sayan De, MD

10/26/2017. Comprehensive & Coordinated Orthopaedic Management of Children with CP. Objectives. It s all about function. Robert Bruce, MD Sayan De, MD Comprehensive & Coordinated Orthopaedic Management of Children with CP Robert Bruce, MD Sayan De, MD Objectives Understand varying levels of intervention are available to optimize function of children

More information

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. PROPRIETARY DRUG NAME / GENERIC DRUG NAME: Lyrica / Pregabalin

More information