HEARING CONSERVATION REPORT
|
|
- Sydney Oliver
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HEARING CONSERVATION REPORT P O Box 1010 Amesbury, MA R E P O R T P R E P A R E D B Y Gordon Hearing Conservation, Inc. PO Box 1010 Amesbury, MA (978) REVIEWED BY Pamela J. Gordon dupont, MS CCC-A Consulting Audiologist VISIT DATES FROM: 05/20/2003 THRU: 05/20/2003
2 INTRODUCTION The 1983 amendment to the OSHA hearing conservation regulation ( ) states that all employees who are exposed to a time weighted average sound level of 85 dba or greater must be included in a hearing conservation program. They must be provided with hearing protection for use in high noise environments. They must be educated once a year regarding various aspects of hearing conservation, including how to properly fit and care for each major type of hearing protector. In addition, each employee in the program must be provided with a hearing test at least once a year. For details regarding the OSHA regulation, please refer to the regulation itself (29 CFR ). Some employees fall under the MSHA (Mine Safety and Health Administration) regulation. If the employee falls under MSHA, the follow up actions are discussed in the report sections in terms of the MSHA regulation. WHAT IS AN AUDIOGRAM? The purpose of the audiogram is to determine the minimum amount of loudness required by an individual to just barely detect the presence of tones at various pitches (or frequencies). The loudness range, in decibels, is 0 db through 90 db. The minimum loudness point is called the audiometric threshold. Thresholds are obtained at six different frequencies ranging from a low of 500 Hz to a high of 6000 Hz. This range is where most of the sounds found in speech occur. Our goal is to determine how well an individual is able to communicate. The normal range of hearing is between 0 and 25 db. If an individual's threshold at any frequency is greater than 25 db, he is said to have a hearing loss. Hearing loss from noise exposure usually begins in the higher frequencies (3000 to 6000 Hz). The
3 INTRODUCTION degree of communication impairment relates to the severity of the loss. An individual may have hearing within the normal range (0-25 db) in the lower frequencies ( Hz) and have only a mild loss in the higher frequencies. This individual may not even notice a hearing loss. However, an individual with a more pronounced high frequency loss may have difficulty understanding speech, particularly in the presence of competing background sounds. With continued exposure to noise with no hearing protection, the hearing loss can become worse, first in the higher frequencies and eventually in the lower pitch range as well. When the loss progresses to this point, speech communication becomes significantly impaired. Many individuals with a hearing loss of this degree may benefit from a hearing aid. In the report, the results of the audiometric test data are presented in two different formats: an alphabetical summary giving the hearing status, change status and recommendations, and lists lists by category. HEARING STATUS: The status of hearing for each ear is broken down using the accepted clinical audiological criteria for degrees of hearing loss. EXPLANATION OF COMPARISONS In the alphabetical summary, the test comparisons (to the baseline or revised baseline) are broken down as follows: NO COMPARISON: Baseline test; there is no previous data to compare to. NO CHANGE: No significant change when compared to the baseline or revised baseline
4 INTRODUCTION using the OSHA formula for standard threshold shift. (STS = an average decrease of 10 db from the baseline or revised baseline at the frequencies of 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz. in either ear.) INITIAL THRESHOLD SHIFT: Evidence of the STS for the first time. PERSISTENT THRESHOLD SHIFT: If an initial STS was seen on the previous test, it is not known whether the loss is permanent or was a temporary loss from exposure to that day's noise. If, on the next test, preferably within a week or so, the shift is still evident, it is said to be persistent. The shift would appear to be noise induced. In this case, the present audiogram becomes the "revised baseline" for the ear in which the shift occurs. All subsequent audiograms are compared to that one. TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFT: If on the second test the shift did not persist, it could be assumed that the loss on the previous test was a temporary loss. BORDERLINE SHIFT: An average of db decrease at Hz. Even though it was not enough to be an STS, it is important that the employee recognize that his hearing is slowly decreasing. IMPROVEMENT: It is possible either through a learning effect or recovery from a temporary loss that the results can show a slight improvement. This calculation is the one for STS in reverse. REPEAT IMPROVEMENT: The improvement was seen on the second test as well. In this case, the baseline is revised to this test for the ear in which the persistent improvement took place. EXPLANATION OF FOLLOW UP LISTS: EMPLOYEES WITH INITIAL THRESHOLD SHIFT: These employees should be retested within 30 days of the date of the original test to determine if the shift is persistent. Therefore, it is important that the employee be away from noise for at least 14 hours
5 INTRODUCTION prior to this retest. Even if the employer does not wish to retest, he should still conduct the follow up necessary for employees who exhibit a persistent STS. Please refer to Appendix 1 of this report, paragraph 8 of the regulation ( ) for a description of the follow up action necessary. EMPLOYEES WITH PERSISTENT THRESHOLD SHIFT: These employees need to be informed of the shift in writing within 21 days of the time you receive the results back. If his TWA is 85 dba or greater, the employee must also be refit and retrained on the proper use and care of hearing protection. It must be determined that the NRR of the protector is sufficient enough for the employee's TWA. Please refer to paragraph 8 of the regulation ( ) in Appendix 1 for the exact follow-up procedure. EMPLOYEES WITH OSHA 300 RECORDABLE SHIFT: These employees should be recorded on the OSHA 300 log. As of January 1, 2003, OSHA has a new regulation regarding recordability of hearing loss. All audiograms tested after January 1, 2003 were evaluated using the new criteria. It is important to note that if an audiogram shows an initial threshold shift, IF THE EMPLOYER DOES NOT PERFORM A RETEST, THE EXISTING STS MUST BE RECORDED ON THE OSHA LOG WITHIN 37 DAYS (30 days to retest plus 7 days to record.) EMPLOYEES RECOMMENDED FOR MEDICAL FOLLOW-UP: These employees exhibited something in their hearing that warrants more in-depth examination by a clinical audiologist or an ear doctor. This could be a significant hearing loss for which the employee might benefit from a hearing aid. Or, it could be a loss or a shift that did not appear to be typically noise induced. This might even be a mild loss in the lower frequencies. The determination for referral is made by the supervising audiologist.
6 TEST ENVIRONMENT Ambient noise levels (db) in test chamber:.5khz 1KHz 2KHz 4kHz 8KHz UNIT: 4 DATE: 05/20/2003 7:00 OK OK OK OK OK EQUIPMENT EQP# UN DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NO SERVICED Test booths (5) Eckel Ind. AB2000 / / Test Booths Eckel Ind. AB custom units / / Audiometer Monitor-De MI /10/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /03/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /06/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /22/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /26/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /10/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /26/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /10/ Audiometer Saico SCR /26/ Audiometer Saico SCR /26/ Bio. Cal. Quest BA EU / / Bio. Cal. Quest BA EU / / Bio. Cal. GSI A 0351 / / Bio. Cal. GSI A 0354 / / Bio. Cal. GSI A 0356 / / Bio. Cal. GSI A 0360 / / Bio. Cal. GSI A 0422 / / Audiometer Monitor-De MI /26/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /26/ Audiometer Monitor-De MI /22/ Audiometer DIGITAL HR SMARTAud V4N /26/08
7 TECHNICIANS AND INTERPRETERS Personnel Reference Code Technician/Tester/Operator Code Technician/Tester/Operator JCG John C. Grant PJG Pamela J Gordon dupont SGG Susan G. Grant Code Interpreter PJG Pamela J Gordon dupont MS, CCC-A
8 EDUCATION AND TRAINING Each employee included in the program viewed an educational video tape on the topic of hearing conservation. The video entitled "Hearing Safety" is produced by Long Island Productions of Durham, N.C. and can be viewed in English or Spanish. The tape begins by showing examples of noises often found in typical industrial settings. Meanwhile, the announcer explains how this noise can cause irrepairable damage to a persons hearing. The basic physics of sound was then explained; how waves travel through the air, are picked up by the ear and then translated by the brain. Examples were given of different sound decibel levels and their potential damage to this hearing process. The tape explained the progression of noise induced hearing loss. It emphasized the fact that damage to the hair cells of the inner ear (the organ responsible for sending these soundwaves to the brain) is irreparable and the accompanying hearing loss is permanent. The program went on to explain how the use of hearing protection can prevent hearing loss as a result of industrial noise pollution. The tape demonstrated the proper fitting and care of each major type of hearing protector including plugs and earmuffs. The process of noise monitoring in the workplace was also discussed and how businesses whose working environments have a certain noise level need to institute an annual hearing testing program for their employees. The tape finished by demonstrating what a permanent hearing loss would sound like and emphasizing that such a loss can be totally avoided by wearing hearing protection.
9 EMPLOYEES WITH AN INITIAL STS The following employees showed a Standard Threshold Shift (STS) for the first time. It is recommended that they be retested to determine if the STS is persistent. If a retest is done, it MUST be done within 30 days of the original test date. If a retest is not done, you should follow the steps for persistent STS (refit and retrain). The STS may or may not be OSHA recordable. This is indicated in on the next page. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR HELIE, CLAIRE B
10 EMPLOYEES WHO SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE OSHA OR MSHA LOG The following employees had an initial STS that fits the criteria for OSHA recordability. They should be placed on the OSHA 300 log as follows: If you are able to conduct a retest within 30 days of the date of the original test, you may wait to put the STS on the log until it is confirmed by the retest. If you may not be able to retest within 30 days, record the STS on the log. If the STS does not persist on a later retest (or the next annual test), the OSHA entry may be lined out. If a retest is not done, the entry must be placed on the log within 37 days of the original test date. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR HELIE, CLAIRE L
11 EMPLOYEES WHOSE STS IS PERSISTENT The following employees showed that their initial Standard Threshold Shift (STS) as defined by OSHA was still evident, either on a retest or the next annual test. The follow-up actions below must be taken for these employees: 1) Inform the employee in writing within 21 days of when you receive the test results. 2) Retrain the employee in hearing conservation. 3) "Refit" HPD'S. Make sure the employee is wearing the hearing protector properly. If the employee's time weighted average exposure level is between 85 and 90 dba, hearing protection becomes mandatory for that employee. 4) Make sure the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) of the hearing protector is appropriate for the employee's noise exposure. 5) It is recommended that you document these procedures, have the employee sign it and keep it in his or her file. The STS may or may not be OSHA recordable. This is indicated on the next page. This test will become the "revised" baseline for the ear in which the STS occurred. Future tests will be compared to this one. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR FISHER, MICHAEL B
12 EMPLOYEES WHO WILL REMAIN ON THE OSHA OR MSHA LOG The following employees whose STS was persistent either on a retest or the next annual test must be placed on the OSHA 300 log. The date of the entry should be the date of the test showing the initial Standard Threshhold Shift. The entry must be recorded within 7 days of when you receive the test results. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR NONE OF YOUR EMPLOYEES WERE INCLUDED IN THIS CATEGORY
13 EMPLOYEES WHOSE STS DID NOT PERSIST ON RETEST The following employees show that their initial STS was NOT persistent, either on a retest or the next annual test. If the initial STS was OSHA recordable, it may be lined out of the OSHA 300 log. These are indicated on the next page. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR LAVERTU, MATTHIEU B
14 EMPLOYEES WHO SHOULD BE LINED OUT FROM THE OSHA OR MSHA LOG The following employess, on their retest or next annual test showed that either the STS was not persistent or the test no longer meets the OSHA minimum requirements to be logged. These employees may be lined out of the OSHA 300 log. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR NONE OF YOUR EMPLOYEES WERE INCLUDED IN THIS CATEGORY
15 EMPLOYEES WITH AN INITIAL STS "NON-NOISE" The following employees showed an initial STS in one or both ears that did not fit the typical pattern of noise induced hearing loss. The audiologist recommends that the employee be retested within 30 days of the original test date to determine if the loss is still evident. If the loss still looks like it is due to a possible medical cause, the audiologist recommends that the employee be evaluated by an ear, nose and throat physician. If it is evident that the loss is NOT work related, the STS would NOT be OSHA recordable. The audiologist is able to assist you in determining the work relatedness of the STS. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR NONE OF YOUR EMPLOYEES WERE INCLUDED IN THIS CATEGORY
16 EMPLOYEES WHOSE STS IS PERSISTENT BUT IS "NON-NOISE" The following employees showed a persistent Standard Threshold Shift (STS), either on a retest or on the next annual test, that did not fit the typical pattern of noise induced hearing loss. Even though the cause may be medical, some of the loss might still be from noise exposure at work. Therefore, the follow-up actions below must be taken for these employees: 1) Inform the employee in writing within 21 days of the time you receive the test results. 2) Retrain the employee in hearing conservation. 3) "Refit" HPD's. Make sure the employee is wearing the hearing protection properly. If the employee's time weighted average exposure level is between 85 and 90 dba, hearing protection becomes mandatory for that employee. 4) Make sure the "Noise Reduction Rating" (NRR) of the hearing protector is appropriate for the employee's noise exposure. 5) It is recommended that you document these procedures, have the employee sign it and keep it in his or her file. Because at least part of the hearing loss appears to be due to a possible medical cause, the employee should be referred to an ear, nose, and throat physician. If it is evident that the STS is NOT work related, the STS would NOT be recorded on the OSHA log. The audiologist is able to assist you in determining the work relatedness of the STS. This test will become the "revised" baseline for the ear in which the STS occurred. Future tests will be compared to this one. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR NONE OF YOUR EMPLOYEES WERE INCLUDED IN THIS CATEGORY
17 EMPLOYEES WHO SHOULD SEE AN EAR DOCTOR The following employees showed a hearing loss or an STS in one or both ears that did not fit the typical pattern of noise induced hearing loss. It is recommended that they be evaluated by an ear, nose and throat physician to determine if the hearing loss has a medical cause. If the hearing loss is not related to his or her work on the job, it is the employee's responsibility to pay for the medical visit. EMPLOYEE NAME EAR BOOHER, RICKY
18 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: BOOHER, RICKY 01/21/1951 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 04/17/ W Q /17/ W Q /20/ W S /20/ U Q 1 2
19 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: BROWN, JEFF 05/16/1952 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 05/20/
20 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: FISHER, MICHAEL 08/28/1953 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 04/19/ /30/ /18/ I C /20/ I P C 1 6
21 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: HELIE, CLAIRE 04/04/1964 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 09/10/ /02/ /16/ /19/ /13/ /21/ /18/ /25/ /17/ /20/ C
22 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: HELIE, ROGER 08/28/1960 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 09/23/ /25/ /18/ /25/ C /17/ C /20/
23 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: KERR, CAROL 01/08/1954 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 09/22/ /25/ C C /17/ /20/ C C 1 1
24 From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Individual Audiometric History Page: 1 EMPLOYEE NAME & ID BIRTHDATE DEPT: JOB: LAVERTU, MATTHIEU 09/17/1962 LEFT EAR RIGHT EAR DATE.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C.5K 1K 2K 3K 4K 6K 8K H C RECOMM 09/20/ E /25/ I C /17/ /18/ C /20/
25 STS AND OSHA LOG SUMMARY REPORT From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Employee Name Clock # Test Date Ear Hearing Change Recommendation Osha Log Action FISHER, MICHAEL HELIE, CLAIRE LAVERTU, MATTHIEU 05/20/2003 Lt: Rt: Mod High Freq Mild High Freq Persist. STS - New B/L No Change Refit H/P & Retrain 05/20/2003 Lt: Mild High Freq Initial STS Retest Record on Log Rt: Within Normal Limits Initial STS 05/20/2003 Lt: Rt: Within Normal Limits Within Normal Limits No Change Temporary Shift No Referral Necessary Total Employees: 3 Page 1
26 ALPHABETICAL SUMMARY REPORT From: 05/20/2003 To: 05/20/2003 Employee Name Clock # Test Date Ear Hearing Change Recommendation BOOHER, RICKY BROWN, JEFF FISHER, MICHAEL HELIE, CLAIRE HELIE, ROGER KERR, CAROL LAVERTU, MATTHIEU 05/20/ /20/ /20/ /20/ /20/ /20/ /20/2003 Lt: Rt: Lt: Rt: Lt: Rt: Lt: Rt: Lt: Rt: Lt: Rt: Lt: Rt: Sev High Freq Mod-Sev Mid/High Freq Within Normal Limits Within Normal Limits Mod High Freq Mild High Freq Mild High Freq Within Normal Limits Within Normal Limits Within Normal Limits Mild High Freq Mild High Freq Within Normal Limits Within Normal Limits No Change No Change No Comparison No Comparison Persist. STS - New B/L No Change Initial STS Initial STS No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change Temporary Shift Medical Referral No Referral Necessary Refit H/P & Retrain Retest No Referral Necessary No Referral Necessary No Referral Necessary Total Employees: 7 Page 1
Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents I. Program Goals and Objectives... 2 II. Scope and Application... 2 III. Regulatory Authority and Related Information... 2 IV. Definitions... 2 V. Responsibilities...
Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual
Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual Issue Date: 1/23/2014 Policy # EHS-400.14 Hearing Conservation Program 1.0 PURPOSE: To establish policy that defines the minimum requirements for the LSUHSC
Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary
ITEM # OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 MSHA 30 CFR Part 62 NIOSH DHHS Pub. No. 98-126 NOISE MEASUREMENT NOISE MEASUREMENT NOISE MEASUREMENT 1 Methods: Not specified Not specified Conform to ANSI S12.19-1996 without
Model Safety Program
Model Safety Program DATE: SUBJECT: Occupational Noise Exposure Program REGULATORY STATUTE: OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 RESPONSIBILITY: The company Safety Officer is. He/she is solely responsible for all facets
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017 1.0 PURPOSE: The objective of the Southern Utah University hearing conservation program is to minimize occupational hearing
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 Purpose 2.0 Regulatory Reference 3.0 Scope 4.0 Responsibility 5.0 Definitions 6.0 Training and Recordkeeping
Hearing Conservation Program
Last Reviewed Date: 3/07/2018 Last Revised Date: 7/27/2017 Effective Date: 6/27/1994 Applies To: Employees, Faculty, Students, Others For More Information contact: EHS, Coordinator at 860-486-3613 or valerie.brangan@uconn.edu
HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE
HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to prevent permanent and temporary occupational hearing loss that may result from impulsive, intermittent or continuous noise
Hearing Conservation Plan
Hearing Conservation Plan TUFTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SEPTEMBER 2018 Table of Contents I. Objective...3 II. Assignment of Responsibility...3 A. Department Chairpersons, Directors or designated
CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation
CCS Administrative Procedure 2.30.05 H Hearing Conservation Implementing Board Policy 2.30.05 Contact: Director of Compliance 1.0 District Environmental Health and Safety Advisory Committee (summary of
Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents
Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents I. Objective II. Assignment of Responsibility A. Management B. Employees III. Procedures A. Noise Monitoring B. Employee Training C. Hearing Protection D.
Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents
Version: 5 Page: 1 of 5 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 1.1 Purpose... 2 1.2 Scope... 2 1.3 Definitions... 2 1.4 Responsibilities... 2 Environmental Health and Safety Office (EHSO)... 2 Directors,
Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4
Contents 1) Purpose... 3 2) Policy... 3 3) Definitions... 3 4) Procedure... 4 a) Requirements... 4 b) Noise standard... 4 c) Responsibilites... 5 d) Exposure Monitoring and Assessments... 6 e) Employee
HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES
HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES UW Environmental Health & Safety Department April 2014 1.0 Policy In an effort to prevent permanent hearing loss caused by excessive noise, UW maintains a
Emerging Best Practices. Christine B. Petitti Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management OSHA
Emerging Best Practices Christine B. Petitti Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management OSHA Auditory Fit Test Process The ATP is an opportunity to stay informed about our hearing. The ATP
HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE
HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE The purpose of a Hearing Conservation Policy (HCP) is to prevent occupational noise exposures which could lead to noise-induced hearing loss and to comply with existing Occupational
NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation
Scope NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Hearing Conservation The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, whenever employee noise exposures equal or
Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this program is to provide guidelines for employees exposed to occupational noise and to comply with the OSHA Occupational
11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC
1.0 Introduction 11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter 296-817, WAC This hearing conservation program applies to those employees who are exposed to noise levels that equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted
Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing
Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing Who are you? Are you in charge of the HCP? Do you provide consultation to HCP?
Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018
Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the Indiana University Hearing Conservation Program is to prevent occupational noise exposures which could lead to
NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY
Yale University Environmental Health and Safety NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY Revised: June 2017 Environmental Health & Safety TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. NOISE AND HEARING CONSERVATION
Hearing Conservation Plan
Hearing Conservation Plan TUFTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY OCTOBER 2016 Table of Contents I. Objective...3 II. Assignment of Responsibility...3 A. Department Chairpersons, Directors or designated
Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program
Environmental Health and Safety Hearing Conservation Program Date of Issuance: 07/23/2018 Revision Number: Initial Revision Date: Prepared by: EH&S 1. Purpose Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) has developed
Hearing Loss and Conservation in Industrial Settings
Hearing Loss and Conservation in Industrial Settings NICHOLAS PARMER, AuD Audiologist Munson Medical Center Central Michigan University B.S. in Communication Disorders 2010 Doctor of Audiology 2014 Interests
Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program June 2018 Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents I. Purpose II. III. Responsibilities Program Directives A. Noise Exposure Monitoring B. Audiometric Testing C. Control
The University of Texas at El Paso
The University of Texas at El Paso Hearing Conservation Program PURPOSE The purpose of the Hearing Conservation Program is to provide information for the protection of University employees from long term
HEARING CONSERVATION CHECKLIST
HEARING CONSERVATION CHECKLIST USE CHECKLIST TO EVALUATE YOUR HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Here s a Checklist you can adapt and use to evaluate your own hearing conservation program. You should be able
UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED Hearing Conservation
1.0 Purpose and Scope To establish guidelines for use at all Waupaca Foundry, Inc. facilities, preventing potential employee hearing loss due to occupational noise exposures. Each facility should review
Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003
Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003 1. Purpose 1.1. The purpose of this procedure is to establish a TVA Hearing Conservation Program (HCP)
Hearing Conservation Program
1500 - Hearing Conservation Program DOCUMENT HISTORY Version Date Comments 1.0 January, 2016 Initial Hearing Conservation Program 2.0 July, 2017 Annual Review This document will be reviewed routinely and
Hearing Conservation
3.1.2.7 Hearing Conservation YOUR ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES/GUIDELINES TITLE: Hearing Conservation NUMBER: 3.1.2.7 PREPARED BY: SECTION/TOPIC: Safety at Emergency Incidents ISSUE DATE:
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Prepared By: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICE 0 Revision Table of Contents Introduction..3 Hearing Conservation Responsibilities.....4 Identification of Noise Exposure...5
Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing
Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing NIOSH indicates that up to 30 million American workers are at risk of hazardous
Hearing Conservation Program
I. PURPOSE: Calhoun Operations Effective: December 11, 2007 Reviewed: 7/30/2009 Revised: 7/30/2009 The purpose of this policy is to provide appropriate guidelines to minimize the potential for occupationally
Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised
Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Revised March 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM...2 1.1 District Policy...2 1.2 Plan Review...2
3M Center for Hearing Conservation
3M Center for Hearing Conservation Key Terms in Occupational Hearing Conservation Absorption A noise control method featuring sound-absorbing materials that are placed in an area to reduce the reflection
Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053
Hearing Conservation Program Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053 December 10, 2013 Program Approval Signature on file in the EHS Office 5/19/10 Signature Date Joe Sugg Assistant
Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs
Title: Hearing Conservation Program Print Date: Revision # Effective Date: Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs Reviewed By: Jen Stones Josh Manning Date Prepared: 09.2017 Date Reviewed: 10.26.2017 10.26.2017
Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System
HEARING / NOISE CONSERVATION 1. INTRODUCTION Written in 1983, the OSHA Hearing Conservation Standard (29CFR1910.95 Occupational Noise Exposure) requires that employers implement a hearing conservation
Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual
I. PURPOSE: The primary goal of the Villanova University Hearing Conservation Program is to comply with the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hearing conservation
Occupational Noise Exposure
Occupational Noise Exposure Hearing Conservation Training Program Presented by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety Did You Know? About 30 million workers are exposed to hazardous noise on the
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE # PURPOSE / INTRODUCTION / SCOPE 1, 2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 2 EMPLOYEE TRAINING 3 ENGINEERING CONTROLS 4 NOISE EXPOSURE EVALUATION 4 SIGNAGE / POSTING 4-5 AUDIOMETRIC
Hearing Conservation
Hearing Conservation T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F T E X A S A T A R L I N G T O N Hearing Conservation Manual E & H S Environmental Health & Safety Office 500 Summit Avenue Box 19257 Arlington, TX 76019
Hearing Conservation Program
1. Introduction The University of Denver (HCP) is written in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Industry Standard Occupational Exposure to Noise CFR 1910.95
Your Company Hearing Conservation Program
Your Company Hearing Conservation Program Instructions for filling out Generic Company Hearing Conservation Program Policy Page 1: General company information It is not necessary to fill out this page
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED STANDARD ON HEARING CONSERVATION
SNAPON INCORPORATED STANDARD ON HEARING CONSERVATION Issued By:.DOC Approval: Page 1 of 9 1.0 SCOPE It is Snapon Incorporated's policy to have in place a management system that drives all operating units
Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources
Hearing Conservation Program Southwestern Community College Office of Human Resources Revised January 26, 2005 Southwestern Community College 1. PURPOSE HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM 1.1 The purpose of
Health, Safety, Security and Environment
Document owner and change code Document Owner Aaron Perronne Title HSSE Manager Mark X Change Code Description X N/A First Issue A Typographical/Grammatical correction; formatting change; text clarification-no
Establishing an Effective Hearing Conservation Program. Sarah E. Mouser, AuD, CCC-A Doctor of Audiology & Customer Relations Facilitator
Establishing an Effective Hearing Conservation Program Sarah E. Mouser, AuD, CCC-A Doctor of Audiology & Customer Relations Facilitator History of Hearing Conservation In 1969 the first noise regulation
POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure
POLICY Noise Exposure E & B Oilfield Services, Inc. has implemented this policy to ensure no employee is exposed to noise that exceeds the action levels. Danny Abegglen is the designated supervisor for
BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE
BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE A. Purpose... 1 B. Objective... 1 C. Scope... 1 D. Noise Level Monitoring and Evaluation... 2 E. Noise Control... 3 F. Audiometric Testing... 4 G. Hearing
Earplug Attenuation Validation As Part of a Hearing Conservation Program. David Friedman, CIH,MSPH, ARM Luminant
Earplug Attenuation Validation As Part of a Hearing Conservation Program David Friedman, CIH,MSPH, ARM Luminant Occupational Noise Exposure Regulations MSHA regulates noise exposure in 30 CFR Part 62 &
Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program Subject Matter Expert Brandi E. Kissel bek66@cornell.edu 607-882-5273 Page 1 of 9 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 OBJECTIVES AND METRICS... 2 3.0 SCOPE... 2 4.0 ROLES AND
Hearing Conservation Services Specifications
Hearing Conservation Services Specifications FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT The following equipment is used in assessing hearing, middle ear function and noise levels: - Maico MA40 audiometer - Maico MA41 audiometer
Environmental Health & Safety Programs
1.0 Introduction Worker exposure to noise of sufficient intensity and duration can result in permanent hearing damage. Noise-induced hearing loss rarely results from a single exposure; it can progress
Procedure. Procedure
Procedure 4.1526 Occupational Noise Hearing Conservation Procedure A. Purpose... 1 B. Objective... 1 C. Scope... 1 D. Noise Level Monitoring and Evaluation... 2 E. Noise Control... 3 F. Audiometric Testing...
Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program 1.0 Scope and Application The following procedures describe procedures for assessing and controlling excessive occupational noise exposure as directed by University policy
Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Workplace Integra, Inc.
Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Integra, Inc. A-Weighting A filter applied to noise measurements, intended to replicate the frequency sensitivity of the human ear. The A-weighting is the most
CITY OF FORT BRAGG HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
CITY OF FORT BRAGG HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM A. PURPOSE It is the City s policy to protect the health and safety of employees through the establishment and enforcement of this Hearing Conservation Program
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
SUNY OSWEGO FACILITIES SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Program Number EHS-HCP-2014 Original Effective Date 2007 Revision Number-Date 12/01/2014 1.0 Purpose 2.0 Scope
UC Merced Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program www.ucmerced.edu Version 2015-1 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 PURPOSE... 1 2.0 REGULATIONS AND OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS... 1 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES... 1 3.1 Department
Hearing Conservation and Noise Control
Hearing Conservation and Noise Control Objectives What is sound? How the ear works How to measure noise What the Regulations say about noise Reading hearing tests Hearing Protection What is Sound? Hertz
SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Prepared by SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CA MORAGA, CA KAREN LAURICELLA
SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD 1.1.2 HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Prepared by SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CA MORAGA, CA KAREN LAURICELLA Original Date: 3 June 2003 Effectivity: Revision: NC Approval
SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program
SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program Inception Date: Not Specified Latest Revision/Review Date: August 1, 2018 Previous Revision/Review Date: June 28, 2017
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Revised 11/14/2013 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 2 2. RESPONSIBILITIES... 3 a. Employees... 3 b. Department Directors/Supervisors/Designees...
Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program
Gettysburg College Hearing Conservation Program September 10, 2007 Table of Contents I. Introduction A. Purpose B. Scope II. III. IV. Responsibility A. President of Gettysburg College/Director of Risk
Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program Revised: September 2017 2009-2017. University of New Hampshire Office of Environmental Health and Safety. All rights reserved. The most current version of this document can
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University I. PURPOSE. It is the intent of Texas Christian University to provide every employee with a safe and healthful working environment. Any faculty or
Delaware State University
Delaware State University University Area Responsible: Risk and Safety Management Policy Number and Name: 7-09: Hearing Conservation Policy Approval Date: 7/28/11 Revisions: 8/8/2013 Reviewed: 7/26/2013
HEARING CONSERVATION & NOISE EXPOSURE. 10/1/99 Created By: C. Miterko 1
HEARING CONSERVATION & NOISE EXPOSURE 10/1/99 Created By: C. Miterko 1 Objectives What is sound? How the ear works How to measure noise What does OSHA says about noise? Reading hearing tests Hearing Protection
East Carolina University
East Carolina University Office of Environmental Health & Safety 211 S Jarvis Street, Suite 102 Greenville, NC 27858 P: (252) 328-6166 F: (252) 737-1458 www.ecu.edu/oehs Hearing Conservation Program ii
Page104. Hearing Conservation Program
Page104 Hearing Conservation Program Page105 Table of Contents Hearing Conservation Program 1. Introduction 2. Noise Exposure Measurement 3. High Exposure Areas or Jobs 4. Audiometric Testing 5. Employee
Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program
Gettysburg College Hearing Conservation Program Adopted Aug 28, 2008 Reviewed and Updated July 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction A. Purpose B. Scope II. Responsibility A. Associate Director of Environmental
What s New? Example 2 Employee B. Example 1 - Employee A
What s New? OSHA Recordable Hearing Loss: What s New and What s Not Pierce M. Sherrill, D.O., FAOASM Aurora Medical Group Green Bay, Wisconsin 29 CFR 1904.10 final rules are intended to be: More Sensitive
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM PREPARED BY THE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY REVISED June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction... 1-1 2.0 Exposure
Health Standards to Protect Miners from Hearing Loss
Health Standards to Protect Miners from Hearing Loss U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration September 1999 Today, in many U.S. mines, the miners are exposed to extremely loud and
UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017
UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017 Table of Contents Purpose Applicable Regulations and Standards Responsibilities
OCCUPATIONAL NOISE PROGRAM
OCCUPATIONAL NOISE PROGRAM FEBRUARY 2007 Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Objective 3 Definitions 4 Responsibilities 4 Permissible Exposure Limits 4 Administrative Controls 6 Recordkeeping 7
29 CFR OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GTRI/EOEML/SHETD Occupational Health Branch Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0837 Voice (404)894-2646 FAX (404)894-8275 29 CFR 1910.95 OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE (a) Protection against
UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual
UCSB Hearing Conservation Program Manual Page 1 of 12 UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual Rev. November 2016 Program Manager: Nick Nieberding Title: Industrial Hygiene Specialist Email:
Hearing Conservation Program
California State University, Chico Department of Environmental Health and Safety TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Introduction... 1-1 2.0 Exposure Limites for Noise... 2-1 2.1 Protection... 2-1 2.2 Levels
Town of Brunswick. Hearing Conservation Plan
Town of Brunswick, Maine Incorporated 1739 SAFETY COMMITTEE 85 UNION STREET BRUNSWICK, ME 04011 TELEPHONE 207-725-6653 FAX # 207-725-6663 Town of Brunswick Hearing Conservation Plan 1 Hearing Conservation
Hearing Conservation Manual
2408 Wanda Daley Drive Ames, Iowa 50011-3602 (515) 294-5359 www.ehs.iastate. edu Copyright Environmental Health and Safety 2809 Daley Drive Ames, IA 50011-3660 Ph: (515) 294-5359 www.ehs.iastate.edu Reviewed
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM
I. INTRODUCTION The University of Wyoming (UW) is committed to protecting the health and safety of students, employees, faculty, and volunteers at the various UW facilities. Therefore, it is UW s policy
Hearing Conservation Program Administration
Hearing Conservation Program Administration Part 1: Exposure Monitoring Thomas W. Rimmer, ScD, CIH Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences This work is licensed
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM REVISED AS OF 12 JULY 2010
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM REVISED AS OF 12 JULY 2010 General - Exposure to high intensity noise is one of the most widespread hazards in DLA Strategic Materials. Noise induced hearing loss, although
Hearing Conservation Program
The University of Memphis Hearing Conservation Program December 2016 Table of Contents University of Memphis Hearing Conservation Program Contents Purpose... 1 Scope and Application... 1 Responsibilities...
Purpose: To provide a process to protect employees from hearing loss caused by excessive occupational exposure to noise.
CNM WAY PROCESS CNM Process Name Hearing Conservation Program (03/30/2018 Revision) Overview of Hearing Conservation Program Purpose: To provide a process to protect employees from hearing loss caused
Hearing ConservationTraining
Hearing ConservationTraining Introduction Employees who are exposed to hazardous levels of noise in the workplace are at risk for developing noise-induced hearing loss. Noise-induced hearing loss is 100
San Diego Community College OSHA Standards
San Diego Community College OSHA Standards Hearing Conservation Program REV 5 11/19/2015 Original: 10/29/15 Rev 2: 10/29/15 Rev 3: 11/06/15 Rev 4: 11/10/15 Rev 5: 11/19/15 Table of Contents PURPOSE...
(b) is as low as is reasonably practicable, where it is not reasonably practicable to meet the standard under clause (a).
PART 12 HEARING CONSERVATION AND NOISE CONTROL Sound control design 12.1 An employer must ensure that a new workplace, a significant physical alteration, renovation or repair to an existing workplace or
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY & HEALTH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY & HEALTH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE Subject: Hearing Conservation and Noise Control Effective Date: January 2016 version 3 Supersedes: May 2009 Review Date: 3 years or
Hearing Conservation Program
Hearing Conservation Program Requirements for Arboricultural Work as Referenced with OSHA s Hearing Conservation Standard, 29 CFR Part 1910.95 Compliance Guide 2 Hearing Conservation Program Requirements
INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing
INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards Noise & Hearing Conservation Part II By: Magdy Akladios, PhD, PE, CSP, CPE, CSHM V. Audiometric Testing Equal Loudness Contours (Fletcher-Munsen Curves) 1 Testing
Occupational Noise Exposure 29 CFR
Occupational Noise Exposure 29 CFR 1910.95 Is There a Problem? More than 30 million Americans are exposed to hazardous sound levels on a regular basis 10 million have suffered irreversible noise induced
noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss
noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS Noise and its Effects Noise is a serious and widespread problem in many New Brunswick workplaces. Over
Hearing assessment is an essential part of hearing conservation.
Hearing assessment is an essential part of hearing conservation. Kevin Hedges Senior Principal Occupational Hygienist (Northern Region) 25 August 2009 Safety and Health is everyone s business. Helen Keller
Hearing Conservation Training Program
Hearing Conservation Training Program For 49 CFR Part 227 2009 Transportation Occupational Medicine Consultants, Inc. 1 Introduction This presentation is intended to provide you with the information and
Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist
Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist Training and Education Yes No N/A Comments 1. Is training conducted at least once a year? 2. Is the training provided by a qualified instructor? 3. Is