The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not"

Transcription

1 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product. Before prescribing any product mentioned in this Register, healthcare professionals should consult prescribing information for the product approved in their country. GSK Medicine: GSK Study Number: AD Title: ADA gene transfer into hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells for the treatment of ADA-SCID. Rationale: GSK is an innovative gene therapy. The present document describes the third trial conducted with GSK in subjects with severe combined immunodeficiencies due to adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA- SCID). This document presents the results of the first 3 years post-treatment for the 12 subjects enrolled in this study. Phase: I/II Study Period: 12 June 2002 to 06 July Study Design: This was a prospective, sequential, open-label, non-randomised, single centre, controlled study (comparison with historical control data). Subjects underwent screening, discontinuation of polyethylene glycolmodified adenosine deaminase (PEG-ADA) and baseline evaluation ( Pre-Treatment phase); bone marrow extraction and transduction, non-myeloablative conditioning and bone marrow re-infusion ( Treatment phase); and posttreatment follow-up (for the purposes of adverse event reporting, divided into an initial 3 Month Hospitalisation phase [0 to 3 months post-treatment] and a 3 Year phase [post-3 months to 3 years post-treatment]). Centre: Hospital San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (HSR-TIGET), Milan, Italy. Indication: SCID due to ADA deficiency. Treatment: Following busulfan preconditioning between 2 and 20 x 10 6 transduced autologous CD34+ cells/kg were infused through an intravenous catheter over approximately 20 minutes. The exact dose received by each subject was dependent upon the number of CD34+ cells available following bone marrow extraction, their growth during the manufacturing process, and the % CD34+ cells present at the end of the transduction procedure. Objectives: Evaluation of the safety and the clinical efficacy of gene therapy, in the absence of enzyme replacement therapy. Evaluation of biological activity (engraftment, ADA expression) of ADA-transduced CD34+ cells and their haematopoietic progeny. Evaluation of immunological reconstitution and purine metabolism after gene therapy. Primary Outcome (Endpoints)/Efficacy: The primary efficacy endpoint was survival at 3 years post-gene therapy. Secondary Outcome (Endpoints)/Efficacy: Secondary efficacy endpoints were as follows: 1.1) Change in the rate of severe infections (defined as infections requiring hospitalisation or prolonging hospitalisation). 1.2) Change in T-lymphocyte counts. 1.3) Modification of the "systemic" metabolic defect, analysed by levels of purine metabolites in red blood cells (RBCs). 2.1) Change in the proliferative response to polyclonal stimuli. 2.2) Change in thymic activity (T-cell receptor excision circles; TREC). 2.3) Presence of genetically modified cells in the bone marrow compartment and presence of >10% genetically modified cells in peripheral blood lymphocytes. 2.4) Lymphocyte ADA enzyme activity. 2.5) Change in lymphocyte counts. 3.1) Recovery of physical growth. 3.2) Need for reintroduction of PEG-ADA (in subjects previously treated with PEG-ADA). 3.3) Antibody response to vaccination. All efficacy endpoints were evaluated at 1, 2 and 3 years. Safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Statistical Methods: The sample size was 12 subjects, which provided approximately 90% power to detect a 35% advantage in overall survival at 3 years following treatment with gene therapy (alpha=0.05) over bone marrow transplant from matched unrelated donor (MUD). Efficacy Analyses: The primary analysis population was the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population. Analyses for the Per- Protocol (PP) Population were also performed for the primary endpoint and selected secondary endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was subject survival. Overall survival at 3 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A Poisson regression model was used to compare the pre- and post-treatment rate of severe infections. The continuous secondary efficacy endpoints were analysed using a repeated measures model to compare the mean change from baseline at 1, 2 and 3 years using a mixed model. Continuous variables were examined for the 1

2 normality assumption. If necessary, log-transformation was applied to improve compliance with the normality assumption. A small positive number was added to zero to enable log-transformation if the original observed value was zero. Other secondary efficacy endpoints that were characterised as categorical were compared with the reference using a 1-sample proportion test. Summary statistics and 95% confidence intervals were also presented. Unless otherwise stated, all statistical analyses were 2-sided and performed at the 5% level of significance. Safety analyses: Safety was evaluated in the ITT Population. Study Population: Subjects aged <18 years who had SCID with ADA deficiency, as assessed by ADA enzymatic activity and/or genetic analysis, and for whom a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical healthy sibling was not available as a suitable bone marrow donor, were enrolled. In addition, subjects had to fulfil at least 1 of the following criteria: - Subjects who had received enzyme replacement therapy (PEG-ADA) for at least 6 months before enrolment and had at least 2 of the following: absolute lymphopenia (<1500 cells/ul); absolute T lymphopenia (<1000 cells/ul); requirement for intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusion; deficit of serum immunoglobulins (IgM or IgA or subclasses of IgG) or lack of antibody response to vaccination. -Subjects who had received PEG-ADA, and in whom the drug had been discontinued due to intolerance, allergy, or autoimmune manifestations. -Subjects for whom PEG-ADA was not a life-long therapeutic option (e.g., from countries in which the drug is not available). Subjects infected with human immunodeficiency virus and those with a current malignancy or a history of malignancy, or who received a previous gene therapy treatment in the 12 months preceding enrolment were excluded from the study. Number of Subjects: Enrolled, N 12 Completed, n (%) 11 (92) Total Number Subjects Withdrawn, n (%) 1 (8) Withdrawn due to Adverse Events, n (%) 0 Withdrawn due to Lack of Efficacy, n (%) 0 Withdrawn for other reasons (investigator discretion), n (%) 1 (8) Demographics N (ITT) 12 Females: Males 5: 7 Mean Age, years (SD) 2.38 (1.722) Mean height, cm (SD) 83.4 (15.56) Mean weight, kg (SD) 10.3 (4.16) White White/Caucasian/European Heritage, n (%) 10 (83) Lansky performance status index, n (%) Fully active, normal 9 (75) Minor restrictions in strenuous physical activity 3 (25) Primary Efficacy Results: The summary below presents results for the ITT analysis population. The results for the PP analysis population were consistent with the ITT analysis results for the primary endpoint and the 3 key secondary endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was subject survival at 3 years follow-up post-gene therapy. There were no deaths during the study, i.e., 100% survival in both the ITT and PP Populations. This was numerically greater than the postulated alternate hypothesis of 85% survival. Survival time data was censored for 1 subject who was withdrawn at 2.1 years for BMT when an HLA-identical sibling/family member became available. Secondary Outcome Results: Severe Infections ITT Population Before gene therapy (N=12) After gene therapy (N=12) Number (%) of subjects with events 10 (83) 7 (58) Number of events Total months to 1 year - 8 Year 1 to Year 2-6 Year 2 to Year 3-0 Person-years of observation (free from infection) Rate of infection

3 Lymphocytes and Naïve T-Cell Data (Log-Transformed Data) ITT Population Biomarker (cell counts) Time point n Mean GM ratio vs. baseline (SE) 95% CI CD3+ (10 6 /L) Year (0.37) 1.45, 6.19 Year (0.37) 2.63, Year (0.38) 3.08, CD3+CD8+ (10 6 /L) Year (0.44) 1.80, Year (0.44) 3.54, Year (0.45) 4.35, CD3+CD4+ (10 6 /L) Year (0.34) 1.26, 4.76 Year (0.34) 2.07, 7.85 Year (0.34) 2.26, 8.83 CD4+CD45RA+ (10 6 /L) Year (0.50) 1.01, 7.54 Year (0.52) 1.51, Year (0.52) 1.76, GM=geometric mean; SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval. Lymphocyte Data (Untransformed Data) ITT Population Biomarker (cell counts) Time point n Mean difference vs. baseline (SE) 95% CI CD19+ (10 6 /L) Year (32.65) , Year (32.65) , Year (33.42) , CD16+CD56+ (10 6 /L) Year (16.36) , 3.67 Year (16.36) , Year (16.74) , Summary of Subjects with Metabolic Detoxification Findings ITT Population Time point Detoxification: n/n (%) 95% CI Bone marrow aspirate Year 1 10/11 (91) 59%, 100% Year 2 11/11 (100) 72%, 100% Year 3 10/10 (100) 69%, 100% Peripheral venous whole blood Year 1 11/12 (92) 62%, 100% Year 2 11/11 (100) 72%, 100% Year 3 11/11 (100) 72%, 100% Purine Metabolites and ADA Activity (Log-Transformed Data) ITT Population Biomarker Time point n Mean GM ratio vs. baseline (SE) 95% CI Bone marrow RBC daxp (nmol/ml) Year (0.73) 0.48, 9.10 Year (0.72) 0.23, 4.23 Year (0.74) 0.22, 4.31 Plasma ADA activity (umol/h/ml) RBC ADA activity (umol/h/ml) Year (0.60) 0.00, 0.03 Year (0.59) 0.01, 0.11 Year (0.61) 0.01, 0.08 Year (0.46) 0.70, 4.51 Year (0.45) 1.37, 8.54 Year (0.47) 1.90, Peripheral venous whole blood RBC daxp (nmol/ml) Year (0.53) 1.32, Year (0.54) 0.65, 5.57 Year (0.54) 0.79, 6.87 Plasma ADA activity (umol/h/ml) RBC ADA activity (umol/h/ml) Year (0.50) 0.00, 0.02 Year (0.51) 0.01, 0.05 Year (0.52) 0.01, 0.05 Year (0.55) 0.93, 8.05 Year (0.56) 1.65, Year (0.56) 1.79,

4 Lymphocyte Proliferative Response Data ITT Population 3 H Thymidine Time point n Mean difference vs. baseline (SE) 95% CI incorporation CD3 antibody (counts per Year ( ) , minute) Year ( ) , Phytohaemagglutinin (counts per minute) Year ( ) , Year ( ) , Year ( ) , Year ( ) , Thymic Activity (TREC) Data (Log-Transformed) ITT Population Biomarker Time point n Mean GM ratio vs. baseline (SE) 95% CI TREC (copies/ 100 ng DNA) Year (0.83) 0.44, Year (0.75) 0.65, Year (0.83) 0.68, Summary Statistics of Genetically Modified Cells (Log-Transformed Data) ITT Population Biomarker Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 n Geometric mean (95% CI) n Geometric mean (95% CI) n Geometric mean (95% CI) Bone marrow CD15+ (%) (0.39, 2.88) (0.42, 4.10) (0.45, 1.93) CD19+ (%) (0.90, 8.42) (1.07, 7.08) (2.51, 11.00) CD3+ (%) (17.00, 70.99) (16.99, 75.29) (29.88, 75.31) CD34+ (%) (0.53, 3.10) (0.56, 5.20) (0.78, 2.56) CD56+ (%) (6.57, 41.28) (11.68, 33.39) (4.34, 22.46) Glycophorin A+ (%) (0.26, 2.07) (0.62, 3.56) (0.54, 3.20) Peripheral blood CD15+ (%) (0.26, 1.56) (0.25, 1.26) (0.32, 1.42) CD19+ (%) (17.03, 55.51) (12.74, 40.46) (15.88, 41.17) CD3+ (%) (20.91, 91.46) (48.92, 81.16) (46.66, 73.10) CD4+ (%) (39.92, 91.04) (41.83, 98.21) (46.95, 66.67) CD56+ (%) (11.57, 88.12) (11.30, 38.68) (14.55, ) CD8+ (%) (35.04, ) (67.61, 96.65) (45.04, 80.12) CD16+CD56+ (%) Summary of Subjects with Lymphocyte ADA Enzyme Activity >210 nmol/h/mg ITT Population Time point ADA Activity: n/n (%) 95% CI Year 1 4/10 (40) (12%, 74%) Year 2 5/10 (50) (19%, 81%) Year 3 8/11 (73) (39%, 94%) Lymphocytes in Peripheral Blood Data (Log-Transformed Data) ITT Population Biomarker Time point n Mean GM ratio vs. baseline (SE) 95% CI Lymphocytes (10 6 /L) Year (0.26) 0.59, 1.62 Year (0.26) 0.94, 2.59 Year (0.26) 1.20, 3.39 Summary of Time-To-PEG-ADA Reintroduction Endpoint ITT Population Endpoint Gene therapy (N=12) PEG-ADA reintroduction 2 Censored, follow-up ended 0 Censored, follow-up ongoing 10 Event summary in years n 2 Mean (standard deviation) (1.1965) Median (range) ( ) While generally remaining below the 50 th percentile, boys and girls showed increases in height and weight over the period for which data were collected. 4

5 Eleven of 12 subjects no longer required long-term enzyme replacement therapy after gene therapy. Two subjects required PEG-ADA, with a mean time to reintroduction of 1.2 years; however, 1 of these subjects was treated with PEG-ADA for only 1 month in total. All 12 subjects were receiving IVIG at screening, and 7 were able to discontinue maintenance IVIG during the 0 3 year follow-up. Six of 7 subjects who were able to discontinue IVIG had vaccination records. Three of these had detectable antibodies to pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and Haemophilus B at 1 or more time points. For the remaining 3 subjects post-vaccination antibody response data was not available. Safety Results: All AEs occurring in more than 1 subject are summarised below. Most Frequent Adverse Events Pre- and Post-Therapy Pre-treatment phase Treatment phase 3 Months hospitalisation 3 Month 3 Years follow-up (N=12) (N=12) (N=12) (N=12) (N=12) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Subjects with any AE(s) 12 (100) 5 (42) 12 (100) 12 (100) 12 (100) Total 5

6 Failure to thrive 8 (67) (67) Rhinitis 2 (17) (67) 8 (67) Device-related infection (25) 4 (33) 6 (50) Diarrhoea 3 (25) 0 3 (25) 4 (33) 6 (50) Upper respiratory tract infection 1 (8) 0 2 (17) 4 (33) 6 (50) Anaemia 1 (8) 0 2 (17) 2 (17) 5 (42) Computerised tomogram thorax abnormal 3 (25) (25) 5 (42) Cough 1 (8) (33) 5 (42) Gastroenteritis 1 (8) (33) 5 (42) Hepatic enzyme increased (33) 2 (17) 5 (42) Hypothyroidism 3 (25) (17) 5 (42) Oral candidiasis 3 (25) 0 4 (33) 1 (8) 5 (42) Pyrexia 3 (25) 1 (8) 1 (8) 4 (33) 5 (42) Hepatomegaly 3 (25) (8) 4 (33) Hypertension 1 (8) 0 3 (25) 0 4 (33) Neutropenia (25) 2 (17) 4 (33) Phimosis 2 (17) (17) 4 (33) Skin lesion 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 2 (17) 4 (33) Atrial septal defect 3 (25) (25) Blood immunoglobulin E increased 1 (8) (17) 3 (25) Bronchitis (8) 3 (25) 3 (25) Candida infection 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 1 (8) 3 (25) Deafness bilateral 1 (8) (17) 3 (25) Ear infection 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 1 (8) 3 (25) Electrophoresis protein abnormal 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 1 (8) 3 (25) Eosinophilia 1 (8) (17) 3 (25) Escherichia urinary tract infection (8) 3 (25) 3 (25) Hypertrichosis 3 (25) (25) Nasopharyngitis 1 (8) 0 2 (17) 2 (17) 3 (25) Pneumonitis 2 (17) 0 1 (8) 0 3 (25) Psychomotor retardation 3 (25) (25) Rash (8) 2 (17) 3 (25) Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial (17) 1 (8) 3 (25) Urinary tract infection pseudomonal 1 (8) 1 (8) 3 (25) 0 3 (25) Varicella (25) 3 (25) Vomiting 2 (17) 0 1 (8) 0 3 (25) Acquired phimosis (17) 2 (17) Blood alkaline phosphatase increased 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 1 (8) 2 (17) Bone development abnormal (17) 2 (17) Cryptorchism 2 (17) (8) 2 (17) Decreased appetite (17) 0 2 (17) Dermatitis (17) 0 2 (17) Dermatitis atopic (17) 2 (17) Developmental delay 1 (8) (8) 2 (17) Enteritis (8) 1 (8) 2 (17) Febrile neutropenia (17) 0 2 (17) Food aversion 2 (17) (8) 2 (17) Gastroesophageal reflux disease 1 (8) (8) 2 (17) Haemophilus infection (17) 2 (17) Hypothalamo-pituitary disorder 2 (17) (17) Interstitial lung disease 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 0 2 (17) Iron deficiency anaemia (8) 1 (8) 2 (17) 6

7 Lymphadenopathy 2 (17) (17) Nuclear magnetic resonance 2 (17) (17) imaging brain abnormal Otitis media (17) 2 (17) Productive cough 1 (8) (8) 2 (17) Pseudomonas test positive 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 0 2 (17) Respiratory tract infection (8) 2 (17) 2 (17) Respiratory tract infection bacterial 1 (8) (8) 2 (17) Rhinorrhoea 1 (8) (8) 2 (17) Sinusitis 1 (8) (8) 2 (17) Skin ulcer 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 0 2 (17) Staphylococcal sepsis 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 0 2 (17) Tympanometry abnormal (17) 2 (17) Urinary tract infection bacterial (8) 1 (8) 2 (17) Visual evoked potentials abnormal 2 (17) (17) Weight decreased (17) 2 (17) 1 Central venous catheter Serious Adverse Events - Post-Therapy [Number of events considered by the investigator to be related to study medication] Treatment 3 Months 3 Month Total phase 1 hospitalisation 3 Years follow-up (N=12) (N=12) (N=12) (N=12) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Subjects with non-fatal SAEs NR 4 (33) [0] 9 (75) [0] 10 (83) [0] Device-related infection NR 2 (17) [0] 4 (33) [0] 5 (42) [0] Gastroenteritis NR 0 2 (17) [0] 2 (17) [0] Neutropenia NR 2 (17) [0] 0 2 (17) [0] Aplastic anaemia NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Autoimmune hepatitis NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Autoimmune thrombocytopenia NR 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Diarrhoea NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Epstein-Barr virus infection NR 1 (8) [0] 0 1 (8) [0] Guillain-Barre syndrome NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Hypertension NR 1 (8) [0] 0 1 (8) [0] Lipofibroma NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Pyrexia NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Respiratory tract infection NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Urinary tract infection NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Varicella NR 0 1 (8) [0] 1 (8) [0] Subjects with fatal SAEs NR The formal reporting of SAEs by the investigator began from gene therapy onwards, i.e. the end of the treatment phase. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the engraftment of transduced stem cells as evidenced by the presence of genetically modified lymphocytes. This led to metabolic reconstitution with reference to ADA enzyme activity and systemic detoxification following gene therapy, and immune reconstitution with regard to lymphocyte numbers and functions. All 12 subjects were alive at the end of the follow-up period, with a concomitant decrease in the number of severe infections; 11 of 12 subjects remained free from the need to receive long-term enzyme replacement therapy. With respect to the safety of the treatment observed during the 3-year follow-up period, this was in keeping with a population of patients with primary immunodeficiency treated with non-myeloablative chemotherapy prior to autologous bone marrow transplantation. All 12 subjects reported AEs. The most frequently reported post-treatment AEs were rhinitis (8 subjects, 67%) and device-related infection (6 subjects, 50%). None of the AEs were attributed to study medication by the Investigator. There were no AEs leading to withdrawal from the study. 7

8 Ten subjects (83%) reported a total of 26 SAEs during the 0 3 years follow-up period, most frequently device-related infection (8 events in 5 subjects; 42%). None of the SAEs were fatal, none were attributed to study medication by the investigator and none led to withdrawal. The events resolved with intervention. 8

Analysis of safety The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort.

Analysis of safety The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort. The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

To demonstrate that DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib-MenC-TT co-administered with 10Pn, is non-inferior to DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib coadministered

To demonstrate that DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib-MenC-TT co-administered with 10Pn, is non-inferior to DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib coadministered The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variables:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variables: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Study vaccines Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Study vaccines Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Periods: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Periods: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study Study No.: ADF105220 Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil () tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study against lamivudine ()- Rationale: This study wass a confirmatory

More information

Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI) PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.

More information

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: GSK Medicine: abacavir (ABC)/dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) Study Number: 201147 Title: A IIIb, randomized, open-label study of the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of switching to a fixed-dose

More information

MenC. MenW MenY

MenC. MenW MenY The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

This was a multicenter study conducted at 11 sites in the United States and 11 sites in Europe.

This was a multicenter study conducted at 11 sites in the United States and 11 sites in Europe. Protocol CAM211: A Phase II Study of Campath-1H (CAMPATH ) in Patients with B- Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have Received an Alkylating Agent and Failed Fludarabine Therapy These results are supplied

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Reports of efficacy and safety studies of primary immunodeficiency

Reports of efficacy and safety studies of primary immunodeficiency 2. SYNOPSIS TITLE OF STUDY: Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of IGIV3I GRIFOLS [Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)] for Replacement Therapy in Primary Immunodeficiency

More information

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma Sponsor Novartis Generic Drug Name Panobinostat Therapeutic Area of Trial Refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma Approved Indication Investigational drug Protocol Number CLBH589B2201 Title A Phase II study

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Secondary efficacy endpoints for Part 2, the Eltrombopag-Only Period, included the proportion of subjects who

Secondary efficacy endpoints for Part 2, the Eltrombopag-Only Period, included the proportion of subjects who The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. abcd Clinical Study for Public Disclosure This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. The synopsis which is part of the clinical

More information

Disorder name: Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Acronym: SCID

Disorder name: Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Acronym: SCID Genetic Fact Sheets for Parents Other Disorders Screening, Technology, and Research in Genetics is a multi-state project to improve information about the financial, ethical, legal, and social issues surrounding

More information

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods: Sample Size

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods: Sample Size The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Note: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Hib-MenCY F1 Group Hib-MenCY F2 Group

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Note: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Hib-MenCY F1 Group Hib-MenCY F2 Group The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Infection and Immune Reconstitution: The NEW Forms

Infection and Immune Reconstitution: The NEW Forms Infection and Immune Reconstitution: The NEW Forms Marcie Tomblyn, MD, MS Assistant Professor, UMN Assistant Scientific Director, CIBMTR Minneapolis February 16, 2006 Why the changes? Infection data not

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS (PROTOCOL WX17796)

SYNOPSIS (PROTOCOL WX17796) TITLE OF THE STUDY A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter, 52-week trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunct MMF to achieve remission with reduced

More information

Study Events 2. Consent Information 3. Family History 5. Registry Visit 8. Visit Information 11. Vitals / Measures 13. Clinical History 15

Study Events 2. Consent Information 3. Family History 5. Registry Visit 8. Visit Information 11. Vitals / Measures 13. Clinical History 15 Study Events 2 Consent Information 3 Family History 5 Registry Visit 8 Visit Information 11 Vitals / Measures 13 Clinical History 15 Immunizations, Infusions, Transfusions 31 Medications & Supplements

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: he study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine Study Number: Title: Rationale Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine Study Number: Title: Rationale Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and nonapproved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION

HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION 1 PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES KEY ABBREVIATIONS CID GvHD HSCT IPOPI PID SCID BMT HSC Combined

More information

GSK Medication: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medication: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Product: Blinatumomab Clinical Study Report: MT Date: 11 July 2014 Page 1

Product: Blinatumomab Clinical Study Report: MT Date: 11 July 2014 Page 1 Date: 11 July 2014 Page 1. 2. SYNOPSIS Name of Sponsor: Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH Name of Finished Name of Active Ingredient: Blinatumomab, a murine recombinant single-chain antibody derivative that

More information

HYPER IgM SYNDROME This booklet is intended for use by patients and their families and should not replace advice from a clinical immunologist.

HYPER IgM SYNDROME This booklet is intended for use by patients and their families and should not replace advice from a clinical immunologist. HYPER IgM SYNDROME This booklet is intended for use by patients and their families and should not replace advice from a clinical immunologist. 1 HYPER IgM SYNDROME Also available : COMMON VARIABLE IMMUNODEFICIENCY

More information

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. Please note that the results reported in any single trial may not reflect the overall

More information

3.1 Clinical safety of chimeric or humanized anti-cd25 (ch/anti-cd25)

3.1 Clinical safety of chimeric or humanized anti-cd25 (ch/anti-cd25) 3 Results 3.1 Clinical safety of chimeric or humanized anti-cd25 (ch/anti-cd25) Five infusions of monoclonal IL-2 receptor antibody (anti-cd25) were planned according to protocol between day 0 and day

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. PROPRIETARY DRUG NAME /GENERIC DRUG NAME: Vfend /Voriconazole

More information

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study. The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Immune Reconstitution Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Immune Reconstitution Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Immune Reconstitution Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patrick J. Kiel, PharmD, BCPS, BCOP Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Conflicts of Interest Speaker Bureau

More information

Analysis of immunogenicity

Analysis of immunogenicity The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Center: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Center: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Study No.: Title: Rationale:  Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

5/9/2018. Bone marrow failure diseases (aplastic anemia) can be cured by providing a source of new marrow

5/9/2018. Bone marrow failure diseases (aplastic anemia) can be cured by providing a source of new marrow 5/9/2018 or Stem Cell Harvest Where we are now, and What s Coming AA MDS International Foundation Indianapolis IN Luke Akard MD May 19, 2018 Infusion Transplant Conditioning Treatment 2-7 days STEM CELL

More information

ABC/3TC/ZDV ABC PBO/3TC/ZDV

ABC/3TC/ZDV ABC PBO/3TC/ZDV The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Abstract 861. Stein AS, Topp MS, Kantarjian H, Gökbuget N, Bargou R, Litzow M, Rambaldi A, Ribera J-M, Zhang A, Zimmerman Z, Forman SJ

Abstract 861. Stein AS, Topp MS, Kantarjian H, Gökbuget N, Bargou R, Litzow M, Rambaldi A, Ribera J-M, Zhang A, Zimmerman Z, Forman SJ Treatment with Anti-CD19 BiTE Blinatumomab in Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R ALL) Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Abstract

More information

Primary Immunodeficiency

Primary Immunodeficiency Primary Immunodeficiency DiGeorge Syndrome Severe Combined Immunodeficiency SCID X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) IgA deficiency Hyper- IgM Syndrome Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome

More information

An Overview of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

An Overview of Blood and Marrow Transplantation An Overview of Blood and Marrow Transplantation October 24, 2009 Stephen Couban Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Objectives What are the types of blood and marrow transplantation? Who may benefit

More information

Dosimetric Dose: 450 mg of TST infused over 70 minutes (inclusive of a 10-minute flush) immediately followed by 35

Dosimetric Dose: 450 mg of TST infused over 70 minutes (inclusive of a 10-minute flush) immediately followed by 35 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

WISKOTT-ALDRICH SYNDROME. An X-linked Primary Immunodeficiency

WISKOTT-ALDRICH SYNDROME. An X-linked Primary Immunodeficiency WISKOTT-ALDRICH SYNDROME An X-linked Primary Immunodeficiency WHAT IS WISKOTT ALDRICH SYNDROME? Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) is a serious medical condition that causes problems both with the immune system

More information

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere ) These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert in the country of prescription. Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s):

More information

PROTOCOLS. Severe combined immunodeficiency. Principal investigators. Background. Dr. Louise Pelletier* Dr. Rosemarie Ramsingh

PROTOCOLS. Severe combined immunodeficiency. Principal investigators. Background. Dr. Louise Pelletier* Dr. Rosemarie Ramsingh Severe combined immunodeficiency Principal investigators Dr. Louise Pelletier* Dr. Rosemarie Ramsingh * Office of Community Medicine, First Nations and Inuit Health Branch, Health Canada, Jeanne Mance

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Vaccination with 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants according to HIV

Vaccination with 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants according to HIV Supplemental Digital Content 1. Methodology Inclusion and exclusion criteria Eligible participants were infants between and including 6 10 weeks of age at the time of the first vaccination, who were free

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content Supplementary Online Content Powles T, O Donnell PH, Massard C, et al. Efficacy and safety of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: updated results from a phase 1/2 openlabel

More information

PFIZER INC. PROTOCOL TITLE: Efficacy and Safety of the Authentic Recombinant Human Somatropin Genotropin in Children with Familial Short Stature

PFIZER INC. PROTOCOL TITLE: Efficacy and Safety of the Authentic Recombinant Human Somatropin Genotropin in Children with Familial Short Stature PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.

More information

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.

More information

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. abcd Clinical Study for Public Disclosure This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. The synopsis which is part of the clinical

More information

Form 2033 R3.0: Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Pre-HSCT Data

Form 2033 R3.0: Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Pre-HSCT Data Key Fields Sequence Number: Date Received: - - CIBMTR Center Number: CIBMTR Recipient ID: Has this patient's data been previously reported to USIDNET? USIDNET ID: Today's Date: - - Date of HSCT for which

More information

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods:

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients With ahus, With or Without Baseline Dialysis

Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients With ahus, With or Without Baseline Dialysis SA-PO546 Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients With ahus, With or Without Baseline Johan Vande Walle, 1 Larry A. Greenbaum, 2 Camille L. Bedrosian, 3 Masayo Ogawa, 3 John F. Kincaid,

More information

HBV-2 Group: neonates born to HBsAg+ and HBeAg+ mothers who received a 4-dose vaccination regimen (Part of

HBV-2 Group: neonates born to HBsAg+ and HBeAg+ mothers who received a 4-dose vaccination regimen (Part of The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES CVID MANAGEMENT CVID MANAGEMENT

PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES CVID MANAGEMENT CVID MANAGEMENT PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES CVID MANAGEMENT CVID MANAGEMENT 1 PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES KEY ABBREVIATIONS CVID CT IgA IgG IgM IPOPI IVIG SCIG PID Common Variable Immune Deficiency Computerised tomography

More information