NH State Medicaid HIT Plan

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NH State Medicaid HIT Plan"

Transcription

1 INFORMATION ON INTERNAL PROVIDER AUDITING PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS DOCUMENT. NH State Medicaid HIT Plan June Describes how the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Office of Medicaid Business and Policy (OMBP) will administer the Electronic Health Record (EHR) incentive payment program authorized under section 4201 of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act and outlines the Health Information Technology initiatives that OMBP believes will encourage the adoption and meaningful use of certified EHR technology. SMHP Addendum Version 4 Authors: Andrew Chalsma (603) ; AChalsma@dhhs.state.nh.us New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Office of Medicaid Business and Policy Eve Fralick (603) ; Eve.Fralick@unh.edu New Hampshire Institute on Health Policy and Practice

2 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Revision History... 3 Change Control Document... 4 SMHP Addendum Summary of Revisions... 5 Appendix C: Electronic Provider Incentive Payment System SMHP v3 Table of Contents Page 2

3 Revision History SMHP Version New Hampshire Action Date Submitted to CMS CMS Action 1 Version 1 completed August 3, 2011 Comments received September 20, Responses to CMS Version 1 comments and Version 2 updates completed December 6, 2011 Approval received April 12, 2012 (Enclosure A questions to be addressed in next update) 3 Responses to CMS Enclosure A questions and Version 3 updates August 26, 2013 Approval received November 12, Version 4 completed June 30, SMHP v3 Revision History Page 3

4 Change Control Document The New Hampshire State Medicaid Health Information Technology (SMHP) Addendum (Version 4) revises the New Hampshire SMHP and all prior versions. It includes the following sections: SMHP Addendum Summary of Revisions; and Appendix C (Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals). The following table lists the revision topics and their corresponding page numbers in Version 4. Description SMHP Addendum Version 4 Page Number Policy Summary 5 6 Group Practice Definitions 6 Attestation Eligibility Attestation Reporting Period 7 Attestations Following Payment Recoupment 7 New Hampshire s Audit Strategy 7 8 Appendix C: Electronic Provider Incentive Payment System SMHP v3 Change Control Document Page 4

5 SMHP Addendum Summary of Revisions New Hampshire SMHP Addendum (Version 4) modifies information from prior versions of the New Hampshire SMHP. This section lists each topic that has been revised with a summary of the associated changes. Policy Summary New Hampshire has implemented the following policies and practices for Eligible Professional attestations. Patient Volume Criterion Eligible Professionals (EPs) may select one, or more, location(s) from which to report patient volume encounters. Reporting out of state encounters is optional. However, if included, out of state encounters must be reported in both the numerator and denominator. Group encounter reports must be submitted as supporting documentation; EPs attesting using individual patient volume are required to submit encounter reports upon request of the New Hampshire Medicaid EHR Office. Hospital Based Criterion EPs attesting to Medicaid patient volume are required to attest to Medicaid POS 21, Medicaid POS 23, and total Medicaid encounters during the reporting period. Out ofstate encounters must be included. Supporting documentation is required upon request of the New Hampshire Medicaid Office. Practice Predominantly Criterion EPs that attest to Needy Individual patient volume are required to have worked at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) or Rural Health Center (RHC) for a minimum of six months in order to be eligible to attest for a Medicaid EHR incentive payment. EPs attesting to Needy Individual patient volume that did not work at an FQHC/RHC at any time during the prior calendar year are not eligible to attest. EPs attesting to the Practice Predominantly criterion are required to attest to, and provide supporting documentation for, encounters worked within, and outside of, the FQHC/RHC during the reporting period. Out of state encounters must be included. 50% Rule EPs attesting to Meaningful Use (MU) are required to attest to every location at which services were provided during the MU reporting period. EPs must also attest to, and provide supporting documentation for, the number of Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT), and non CEHRT, encounters provided at each location during the 90 day MU reporting period. Meaningful Use Attestation 2013 SMHP v3 SMHP Addendum - Summary of Revisions Page 5

6 EPs are required to attest to, and provide supporting documentation for, MU measures based on every encounter at every location during the reporting period in which CEHRT was used with the exception of POS 21 and POS 23 encounters (which can be excluded from the calculation). EPs must sum the numerators and denominators calculated by each CEHRT system to obtain a total for the numerator and denominator of the Core and Menu measures and Clinical Quality Measures. However, if practicing locations choose different Menu measures or Clinical Quality Measures, EPs should only report on the encounters from the location with the highest number of encounters. Group Practice Definitions To promote, and facilitate, EP attestations, New Hampshire has taken a broad based approach in defining the criteria that constitutes a group. The following definitions have been authorized to date. Others will be considered on a case by case basis taking into consideration each group s unique characteristics. Group Definition 1 Hospital owned group is comprised of several multi specialty practices. The group uses one Tax Identification Number (TIN) and one EHR. The group combines the patient volume encounters from all providers in the multi specialty practices to calculate one group patient volume. Group Definition 2 Hospital owned specialty practices have separate TINs but shared a common EHR. Each specialty practice calculates patient volume based solely on the providers in its practice and each attests as a unique group. Group Definition 3 Hospital owned practice shares the hospital s TIN. The practice can attest as a unique group and calculate patient volume based solely on the providers in the practice. Attestation Eligibility The following are guidelines used to determine whether EPs are eligible to receive a Medicaid EHR Incentive Program payment. EPs using individual patient volume that wish to receive payment EPs must be actively enrolled in NH Medicaid as of the date of attestation in order to receive an incentive payment. EPs using group patient volume that wish to reassign payment 2013 SMHP v3 SMHP Addendum - Summary of Revisions Page 6

7 EPs that attest using group patient volume do not have to be actively enrolled in NH Medicaid or affiliated with the payee organization as of the attestation date as long as they were affiliated in the past during the applicable attestation reporting periods and meet other program criteria as of the last date of affiliation with the payee organization. Hence, EPs may authorize an organization to attest and receive payment even after they have retired; been fired; or moved to a different organization (as long as they are not reassigning an incentive payment to a new employer/organization). Additionally, new EPs, hired to directly replace EPs that have left an organization, may attest using the group patient volume methodology and reassign payment to the payee organization as long as program criteria have been met. In this situation, the payee organizations may receive reassigned incentive payments from both EPs that left the organization as well as newly hired EPs during the same payment year Attestation Reporting Period EPs are required to select a 90 day reporting period in 2014 to attest for meaningful use measures (in lieu of a three month reporting period). Stage 1 Meaningful Use Menu Measures For the 2014 payment year, the New Hampshire Department of Public Health Services does not have the capability to accept EP data for either public health Menu measure (i.e., Immunization Registry or Syndromic Surveillance). As a result, in order to complete meaningful use attestations for Menu measures, EPs must select one public health Menu measure on which to claim exclusion; then complete five additional (non public health) Menu measures. Attestations Following Payment Recoupments An EP whose payment has been recouped in one payment year may attest during a subsequent year. However, the EP cannot re attest for the same payment year, but, rather, must attest to the next program year s criteria. Example An EP receives a year 1 payment for Adopting, Implementing, or Upgrading (AIU) CEHRT. During a post payment audit, the EP is found to be ineligible, and the payment is recouped. The provider may attest for the first year of Stage 1 MU during a subsequent year, however, the provider is not eligible to reattest for AIU again. New Hampshire s Audit Strategy 2013 SMHP v3 SMHP Addendum - Summary of Revisions Page 7

8 SECTION MODIFIED; SOME PARTS REMOVED Myers and Stauffer LC continue to serve as the vendor for conducting New Hampshire s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program post payment audits with oversight from the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Improvement and Integrity (OII). CMS approved New Hampshire s audit plan for payment years 1 and 2 on April 8, The plan calls for Myers and Stauffer to audit 5 Eligible Hospital (EH) and 30 EP Medicaid EHR Incentive Program attestations. The results of the audits will be used to inform future year audit plans (as applicable) to strengthen New Hampshire s audit program. Appendix C: Electronic Provider Incentive Payment System The New Hampshire SR&A provides modules in which EPs and EHs enter attestation data. For EPs, these modules include: Patient Volume; General Requirements; Meaningful Use Core Measures; Meaningful Use Menu Measures; and Clinical Quality Measures. Appendix C provides an overview of screens in each EP module. In 2014, per the Stage 2 Final Rule, updates were made to several Core and Menu criteria; CQMs were replaced with 64 new CQMs SMHP v3 SMHP Addendum - Summary of Revisions Page 8

9 Appendix C: Electronic Provider Incentive Payment System To submit an attestation, EPs log on to the Electronic Provider Incentive Payment System (epip), the New Hampshire SR&A. epip allows EPs to manage their accounts; attest; review payment history; identify the status of an existing attestation; upload supporting documents; and validate CMS EHR Certification IDs prior to attesting. For Payment Years 2 and 3 (Stage 1 Meaningful Use), epip requires EPs to complete five modules and an attestation statement. This appendix provides an overview of the EP Payment Year 2 and 3 attestation process with applicable screen shots. Select A Payment Year To attest for a Medicaid EHR Incentive Program payment, EPs first select their payment year on the Select A Payment Year webpage. This tab also includes expandable tabs that provide information on a variety of attestation topics including patient volume; Adopt, Implement, and Upgrade; Stage 1 Meaningful Use; and supporting documentation requirements. The following are screens that EPs may view when initiating a Meaningful Use attestation for Payment Years 1, 2 or 3. Select A Payment Year 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 9

10 Select Attestation Type 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 10

11 Submit An Attestation Patient Volume Module EPs enter patient volume data and hospital based (or practice predominantly data) in this module. (Group patient volume is populated by Medicaid EHR staff and automatically populates in epip when an EP attesting to group patient volume logs on.) epip does not allow EPs to proceed to other modules if they do not meet the minimum criteria thresholds in this module. For simplicity purposes, the following screens reflect those of an EP attesting to the individual Medicaid patient volume methodology SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 11

12 Patient Volume Type 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 12

13 Patient Volume Attestation Medicaid Patient Encounters 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 13

14 Hospital-based Attestation 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 14

15 Patient Volume Eligibility Results General Requirements Module In this module, EPs enter their CMS EHR Certification ID; meaningful use reporting period dates (which are auto verified by epip); practice location information; and encounter data within, and/or outside of, CEHRT. epip auto calculates the percentage of CEHRT encounters. The system will not allow EPs that do not meet a minimum 50 percent threshold to proceed with their attestations SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 15

16 General Requirements (continued on next page) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 16

17 General Requirements (continued on next page) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 17

18 General Requirements 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 18

19 General Requirements Eligibility Results Meaningful Use Core Measures Module epip requires EPs to complete 13 Stage 1 Meaningful Use Core measures in order to proceed with their attestations. The following reflect the Stage 1 Meaningful Use Core Measures screens SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 19

20 Original Core Measure 1: Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local and professional guidelines SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 20

21 Optional Core Measure 1: Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local and professional guidelines SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 21

22 Core Measure 2: Implement drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 22

23 Core Measure 3: Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 23

24 Core Measure 4: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx) (continued on next page) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 24

25 Core Measure 4: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx) (continued) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 25

26 Core Measure 5: Maintain Active Medication List 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 26

27 Core Measure 6: Maintain Active Medication Allergy List 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 27

28 Core Measure 7: Record all of the following demographics: (a) Preferred language (b) Gender (c) Race (d) Ethnicity (e) Date of birth 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 28

29 Core Measure 8: Record/chart vital signs: height, weight, blood pressure; calculate and display BMI; plot and display growth charts for children 0-20 years, including BMI (continued on next page) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 29

30 Core Measure 8: Record/chart vital signs: height, weight, blood pressure; calculate and display BMI; plot and display growth charts for children 0-20 years, including BMI (continued) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 30

31 Core Measure 9: Record smoking status for patients 13 years old or older 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 31

32 Core Measure 10: Implement one clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority along with the ability to track compliance with that rule 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 32

33 Core Measure 11: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within four business days of the information being available to the EP 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 33

34 Core Measure 12: Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 34

35 Core Measure 13: Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities Meaningful Use Menu Measures Module epip requires EPs to claim exclusion on one Public Health Menu measure and complete five additional (non Public Health) Menu measures. The following reflect the Stage 1 Meaningful Use Menu Measures screens SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 35

36 Menu Measure 1 (Implement Drug Formulary Checks) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 36

37 Menu Measure 2 (Incorporate clinical lab test results into EHR as structured data) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 37

38 Menu Measure 3 (Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research, or outreach) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 38

39 Menu Measure 4 (Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow-up care) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 39

40 Menu Measure 5 (Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient if appropriate) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals Page 40

41 Menu Measure 6 (The EP who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 41

42 Menu Measure 7 (The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 42

43 Menu Measure 8 (Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries or immunization information systems and actual submission according to applicable law and practice) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 43

44 Menu Measure 9 (Capability to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and actual submission according to applicable law and practice) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 44

45 Clinical Quality Measures Module epip will offer providers the opportunity to select 9 Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) from a total of 64 Clinical Quality Measures. Each CQM is categorized into a Domain (as EPs must include measures from at least 3 Domains). The following reflect the 2014 Stage 1 CQM screens. CMS50v2 (Closing the referral loop: receipt of specialist report) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 45

46 CMS137v2 (Initiation and Engagement of Alcohol and Other Drug Dependence Treatment) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 46

47 CMS165v2 (Controlling High Blood Pressure) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 47

48 CMS125v2 (Breast Cancer Screening) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 48

49 CMS124v2 (Cervical Cancer Screening) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 49

50 CMS130v2 (Colorectal Cancer Screening) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 50

51 CMS126v2 (Use of Appropriate Medications for Asthma) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 51

52 CMS127v2 (Pneumonia Vaccination Status for Older Adults 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 52

53 CMS131v2 (Diabetes: Eye Exam) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 53

54 CMS123v2 (Diabetes: Foot Exam) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 54

55 CMS122v2 (Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 55

56 CMS148v2 (Hemoglobin A1c Test for Pediatric Patients) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 56

57 CMS134v2 (Diabetes: Urine protein Screening) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 57

58 CMS163v2 [Diabetes: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Management] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 58

59 CMS164v2 (Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Use of Aspirin or Another Antithrombotic) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 59

60 CMS145v2 [Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): Beta-Blocker Therapy Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVEF <40%)] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 60

61 CMS182v2 (Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Complete Lipid Panel and LDL Control) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 61

62 CMS135v2 [Heart Failure (HF): Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 62

63 CMS1442v2 [Heart Failure (HF): Beta-Blocker Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 63

64 CMS143v2 [Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG): Optic Nerve Evaluation] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 64

65 CMS167v2 (Diabetic Retinopathy: Documentation of Presence or Absence of Macular Edema and Level of Severity of Retinopathy) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 65

66 CMS142v2 (Diabetic Retinopathy: Communication with the Physician Managing Ongoing Diabetes Care) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 66

67 CMS161v2 [Adult Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): Suicide Risk Assessment] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 67

68 CMS128v2 (Anti-depressant Medication Management) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 68

69 CMS136v3 [ADHD: Follow-Up Care for Children Prescribed Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Medication] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 69

70 CMS169v2 (Bipolar Disorder and Major Depression: Appraisal for alcohol or chemical substance use) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 70

71 CMS141v3 (Colon Cancer: Chemotherapy for AJCC Stage III Colon Cancer Patients) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 71

72 CMS140v2 (Breast Cancer: Hormonal Therapy for Stage IC-IIIC Estrogen Receptor/ Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR) Positive Breast Cancer) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 72

73 CMS62v2 (HIV/AIDS: Medical Visit) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 73

74 CMS52v2 (HIV/AIDS: Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) Prophylaxis) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 74

75 CMS77v2 (HIV/AIDS: RNA control for Patients with HIV 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 75

76 CMS133v2 (Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 76

77 CMS158v2 (Pregnant women that had HBsAg testing) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 77

78 CMS159v2 (Depression Remission at Twelve Months) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 78

79 CMS160v2 (Depression Utilization of the PHQ-9 Tool) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 79

80 CMS75v2 (Children who have dental decay or cavities) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 80

81 CMS74v3 (Primary Caries Prevention Intervention as Offered by Primary Care Providers, including Dentists) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 81

82 CMS61v3 [Preventive Care and Screening: Cholesterol Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) Test Performed] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 82

83 CMS64v3 [Preventive Care and Screening: Risk-Stratified Cholesterol Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C)] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 83

84 CMS149v2 (Dementia: Cognitive Assessment) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 84

85 CMS65v3 (Hypertension: Improvement in blood pressure) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 85

86 CMS146v2 (Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 86

87 CMS166v3 (Use of Imaging Studies for Low Back Pain) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 87

88 CMS154v2 [Appropriate Treatment for Children with Upper Respiratory Infection (URI)] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 88

89 CMS129v3 (Prostate Cancer: Avoidance of Overuse of Bone Scan for Staging Low Risk Prostate Cancer Patients) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 89

90 CMS157v2 (Oncology: Medical and Radiation Pain Intensity Quantified) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 90

91 CMS66v2 (Functional status assessment for knee replacement) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 91

92 CMS56v2 (Functional status assessment for hip replacement) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 92

93 CMS90v3 (Functional status assessment for complex chronic conditions) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 93

94 CMS156v2 (Use of High-Risk Medications in the Elderly) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 94

95 CMS139v2 (Falls: Screening for Future Fall Risk) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 95

96 CMS68v3 (Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 96

97 CMS132v2 (Cataracts: Complications within 30 Days Following Cataract Surgery Requiring Additional Surgical Procedures) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 97

98 CMS177v2 [Child and Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): Suicide Risk Assessment] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 98

99 CMS179v2 (ADE Prevention and Monitoring: Warfarin Time in Therapeutic Range) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 99

100 CMS155v2 (Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children and Adolescents) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 100

101 CMS138v2 (Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 101

102 CMS153v2 (Chlamydia Screening for Women) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 102

103 CMS117v2 (Childhood Immunization Status) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 103

104 CMS147v2 (Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 104

105 CMS2v3 (Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-Up Plan) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 105

106 CMS69v2 [Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up] 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 106

107 CMS82v1 (Maternal depression screening) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 107

108 CMS22v2 (Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for High Blood Pressure and Follow-Up Documented) 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 108

109 Submit an Attestation Webpage Once an EP has completed the applicable epip modules, he/she submits the attestation by verifying attestation data and agreeing to a disclaimer statement. epip will generate a submission tracking receipt and prompt the EP to upload supporting documentation to complete the attestation. Submission Process: Attestation Statements 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 109

110 Attestation Disclaimer 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 110

111 Submission Receipt 2013 SMHP v3 Appendix C: Stage 1 Meaningful Use Page 111

Certified Health IT Transparency and Disclosure Information 2014 Edition

Certified Health IT Transparency and Disclosure Information 2014 Edition Certified Health IT Transparency and Disclosure Information 2014 Edition 2015 Edition Certified Health IT Transparency and Disclosure Information I. Disclaimer This Complete EHR is 2014 Edition compliant

More information

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today s presenter: Al Wroblewski, PCMH CCE, Client Services Relationship

More information

Meaningful Use Overview

Meaningful Use Overview Eligibility Providers may be eligible for incentives from either Medicare or Medicaid, but not both. In addition, providers may not be hospital based. Medicare: A Medicare Eligible Professional (EP) is

More information

GE Healthcare. Delivering the capabilities you need for Stage 2 in the Ambulatory Setting

GE Healthcare. Delivering the capabilities you need for Stage 2 in the Ambulatory Setting GE Healthcare Delivering the capabilities you need for Stage 2 in the Ambulatory Setting March 12, 2013 Topics Certification Criteria Attestation Requirements Functional Measures Clinical Quality Measures

More information

Meaningful Use Simple Guide

Meaningful Use Simple Guide Meaningful Use Simple Guide 2011-2012 CORE Measures 1. CPOE for Medication Orders 2. Drug Interaction Checks * 3. Maintain Problem & Diagnosis List 4. eprescribing (erx) escripts 5. Active Medication List

More information

2014 Clinical Quality Measures: Changes for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Tracy McDonald Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Coordinator

2014 Clinical Quality Measures: Changes for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Tracy McDonald Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Coordinator 2014 Clinical Quality Measures: Changes for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Tracy McDonald Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Coordinator Agenda Why are Clinical Quality Measures important? Clinical Quality

More information

MU - Selection & Configuration of Measures

MU - Selection & Configuration of Measures MU - Selection & Configuration of Measures Presenter: Christy Erickson October 14, 2011 Objectives Review the 15 Core Measures and highlight some findings from the field Discuss the MU Menu and Clinical

More information

Disclosure. From the London Times... What Is Meaningful Use? 11/7/2011. Overview. The Road to Meaningful Use and Beyond

Disclosure. From the London Times... What Is Meaningful Use? 11/7/2011. Overview. The Road to Meaningful Use and Beyond Disclosure The Road to and Beyond A Simple Overview of a Complex Topic I have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. HIT Subcommittee Dr. Charles King II, Chair Dr. Robert Warren Itara Barnes,

More information

PCC EHR Meaningful Use Measures. Maria Horn July 18, :15 pm. Including CQM Reports

PCC EHR Meaningful Use Measures. Maria Horn July 18, :15 pm. Including CQM Reports PCC EHR Meaningful Use Measures Maria Horn July 18, 2014 2:15 pm Including CQM Reports Meaningful Use and PCC EHR This presentation reviews the measures that are housed in PCC EHR which is 2011 CEHRT (Certified

More information

Meaningful Use for Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use for Eligible Providers Meaningful Use for Eligible Providers Summary of Core and Menu objectives and Clinical Quality s Healthcare Technical Assistance Program, March 11, 2011 V.1.0Copyright 2011, Purdue Research Foundation

More information

proposed set to a required subset of 3 to 5 measures based on the availability of electronic

proposed set to a required subset of 3 to 5 measures based on the availability of electronic CMS-0033-P 143 proposed set to a required subset of 3 to 5 measures based on the availability of electronic measure specifications and comments received. We propose to require for 2011 and 2012 that EP's

More information

Meaningful Use. Using Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and improve care coordination

Meaningful Use. Using Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and improve care coordination Meaningful Use Using Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and improve care coordination Meaningful Use Chapter Select Intro & Glossary Meaningful

More information

Meaningful Use Criteria for Pediatric Providers

Meaningful Use Criteria for Pediatric Providers SET OF CRITERIA - 15 REQUIRED These 15 core criteria are called the core set and are required elements for demonstrating meaningful use. This document was prepared for pediatric providers so language pertaining

More information

American College of Physicians Genesis Registry

American College of Physicians Genesis Registry Powered by Premier American College of Physicians Genesis Registry This registry has been approved by CMS as a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) for Eligible Clinicians and group practices for the

More information

N E R U C Using Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and care coordination

N E R U C Using Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and care coordination Due to a last minute ruling on 10/16/2015 O eb K O IS R U C Y L T N E R I 10.14.2014 D I L A V N Meaningful Use IS - Interactive Training Guide TH Using Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology

More information

MIPS: Quality Direct EHR Manual for Aprima Users

MIPS: Quality Direct EHR Manual for Aprima Users MIPS: Quality Direct EHR Manual for Aprima Users CONTENTS QUALITY INTRODUCTION... 5 CMS 2: SCREENING FOR CLINICAL DEPRESSION AND FOLLOWUP PLAN....6 CMS 22: SCREENING FOR HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND FOLLOWUP

More information

Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures for Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures for Eligible Professionals Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures for Eligible Professionals Measure Type NQF ID CMS ID Description Title: Adult Weight Screening and Follow-Up 1 NQF 0421 PQRI 128 calculated BMI in the past six

More information

Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Core Objectives. James R. Christina, DPM Director Scientific Affairs APMA

Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Core Objectives. James R. Christina, DPM Director Scientific Affairs APMA Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Core Objectives James R. Christina, DPM Director Scientific Affairs APMA What Stage Am I In? 2 2 EHR Must Have 2014 ONC Certification Reporting Period for 2014 Stage 2 Requirements

More information

2018 MIPS Reporting Family Medicine

2018 MIPS Reporting Family Medicine 2018 MIPS Reporting Family Medicine Quality Reporting Requirements: Report on 6 quality measures or a specialty measure set Include at least ONE outcome or high-priority measure Report on patients of All-Payers

More information

Clinical Quality Measures

Clinical Quality Measures Core Measures Preventive Care and Screening Measure Pair: a. Tobacco Use Assessment, b. Tobacco Cessation Intervention. Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who have been seen for at least 2

More information

CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES Stage 1 Meaningful Use

CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES Stage 1 Meaningful Use CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES Stage 1 Meaningful Use * Eligible professionals (EPs) must report on 3 required core clinical quality measures (CQMs). If the denominator of 1 or more of the required core measures

More information

American College of Physicians Genesis Registry

American College of Physicians Genesis Registry Powered by Premier American College of Physicians Genesis Registry This registry has been approved by CMS as a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) for Eligible Clinicians and group practices for the

More information

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EP CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES FOR 2014 EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EP CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES FOR 2014 EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAMS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EP CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES FOR 2014 EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAMS The table below entitled Clinical s for 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals contains

More information

Clinical Quality Measures for Submission by Medicare or Medicaid EP/s for the 2011 and 2012 Payment Year

Clinical Quality Measures for Submission by Medicare or Medicaid EP/s for the 2011 and 2012 Payment Year 1 NQF 0059 1 NQF 0064 2 NQF 0061 3 Title: Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control Description: Percentage of patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 or type 2) who had hemoglobin A1c > 9.0%. Title:

More information

NQF Measure Number & PQRI Implementation Number

NQF Measure Number & PQRI Implementation Number Title NQF Steward s Adult Weight Screening and Follow-Up Hypertension: Blood Pressure ment Preventive Care and Screening Pair: a. Tobacco Use Assessment, b. Tobacco Cessation Intervention with a calculated

More information

OCHSNER PHYSICIAN PARTNERS. PQRS Measures by Specialty (FINAL)

OCHSNER PHYSICIAN PARTNERS. PQRS Measures by Specialty (FINAL) OCHSNER PHYSICIAN PARTNERS PQRS Measures by Specialty (FINAL) Allergy and Immunology 2. Asthma: Pharmacologic Therapy for Persistent Asthma - Ambulatory Care Setting (PQRS 53) 3. Patients aged 18 years

More information

For Electronic Measure Specification Information go to:

For Electronic Measure Specification Information go to: Diabetes Recognition NQF 0421 PQRI 128 Title: Adult Weight Screening and Follow-Up Description: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a calculated BMI in the past six months or during the

More information

CMS-3311-P 100 TABLE 6: MEANINGFUL USES OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017

CMS-3311-P 100 TABLE 6: MEANINGFUL USES OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 CMS-3311-P 100 TABLE 6: MEANINGFUL USES OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 Provider Type Eligible Professional Proposed Objectives for 2015, 2016 and 2017 CPOE Prescribing Clinical Decision

More information

Electronic Health Records (EHR) HP Provider Relations October 2012

Electronic Health Records (EHR) HP Provider Relations October 2012 Electronic Health Records (EHR) HP Provider Relations October 2012 Agenda Session Objectives Electronic Health Record (EHR) EHR Incentive Program Certified Technology EHR Meaningful Use EHR Incentive Program

More information

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Meaningful Use Stage 2: Clinical Quality Measures for Eligible Professionals in 2014 and Beyond National Provider Call 10-24-12 Disclaimer This presentation was

More information

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet CMS recently published a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals,

More information

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 NPRM Overview Robert Anthony March 6, 2012 Proposed Rule Everything discussed in this presentation is part of a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

More information

Meaningful Use Exam Protocol Stage 1

Meaningful Use Exam Protocol Stage 1 Meaningful Use Exam Protocol Stage 1 During the attestation period there are a few steps to be conscious about while recording patient data. This guide will explain what to do on each screen and tab in

More information

Costs and Limitations

Costs and Limitations Costs and Limitations For Certified Healthcare IT EHR EMR Version 10.0 07/14/2017 Penn Medical Informatics Systems, Inc Costs and Limitations for EyeDoc EMR Version 10.0 Capability and Description 2014

More information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for Program Year 2018

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for Program Year 2018 Final Meaningful Use Objectives Modified Stage 2 All Eligible Hospitals (EH) and Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. If it is available, EHs and CAHs

More information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017 Final Meaningful Use Objectives Stage 3 All Eligible Hospitals (EH) and Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) must attest to all objectives for Stage 3 using a 2015 Edition CEHRT. If it is available, EHs and

More information

The Alabama Regional Extension Center

The Alabama Regional Extension Center The Alabama Regional Extension Center Mission Statement The Alabama Regional Extension Center is part of the Center for Strategic Health Innovation (CSHI) in the College of Medicine at the University of

More information

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Room 352-G 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Office of Media Affairs MEDICARE FACT SHEET FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

More information

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2014 and 2015 Reporting Years

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2014 and 2015 Reporting Years Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2014 and 2015 Reporting Years Introduction This document describes methods for calculating the quality performance benchmarks for Accountable

More information

Table 1. Proposed Measures for Use in Establishing Quality Performance Standards that ACOs Must Meet for Shared Savings

Table 1. Proposed Measures for Use in Establishing Quality Performance Standards that ACOs Must Meet for Shared Savings CMS-1345-P 174 Table 1. Proposed Measures for Use in Establishing Quality Performance Standards that ACOs Must Meet for Shared Savings AIM: Better Care for Individuals 1. Patient/Care Giver Experience

More information

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set Measure Title * Reportable via PINNACLE α Reportable via Diabetes Collaborative CQMC v1.0 Measure High Priority Measure Cross Cutting Measure Heart Failure (HF): Angiotensin- Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor

More information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2016

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2016 Final Meaningful Use Objectives Modified Stage 2 All Eligible Hospitals (EH) and Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. Modified Stage 2 Objective Protect

More information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017 Final Meaningful Use Objectives Modified Stage 2 All Eligible Hospitals (EH) and Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. Modified Stage 2 Objective Protect

More information

HEALTHCARE REFORM. September 2012

HEALTHCARE REFORM. September 2012 HEALTHCARE REFORM Accountable Care Organizations: ACOs 101 September 2012 The enclosed slides are intended to provide you with a general overview of accountable care organizations (ACOs), created within

More information

Overview of Current Quality Measures that can be Impacted by Ambulatory Pharmacists

Overview of Current Quality Measures that can be Impacted by Ambulatory Pharmacists Overview of Current Quality Measures that can be Impacted by Ambulatory Pharmacists Measure Name Measure Domain Measure Focus Comment/Explanation CMS Value-based Purchasing Program (CMS VBP) AMI 30-day

More information

2016 Internal Medicine Preferred Specialty Measure Set

2016 Internal Medicine Preferred Specialty Measure Set 1 0059 Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (>9%): Percentage of patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes who had hemoglobin A1c > 9.0% during the measurement period 5 0081 Registry, EHR, 9 0105

More information

MEASURING CARE QUALITY

MEASURING CARE QUALITY MEASURING CARE QUALITY Region December 2013 For Clinical Effectiveness of Care Measures of Performance From: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS ) HEDIS is a set of standardized performance

More information

Practice Director Support

Practice Director Support Table of Contents AOA MORE Enrollment 2 AOA MORE Practice Director Version.2-3 Practice Director Update Instructions. 3-4 AOA Management Setup....5-6 AOA Submission Trial and Production Submission Run

More information

Measure Owner Designation. AMA-PCPI is the measure owner. NCQA is the measure owner. QIP/CMS is the measure owner. AMA-NCQA is the measure owner

Measure Owner Designation. AMA-PCPI is the measure owner. NCQA is the measure owner. QIP/CMS is the measure owner. AMA-NCQA is the measure owner 2011 EHR Measure Specifications The specifications listed in this document have been updated to reflect clinical practice guidelines and applicable health informatics standards that are the most current

More information

PCMH 2018 Enrollment and Update August 25, 2017

PCMH 2018 Enrollment and Update August 25, 2017 PCMH 2018 Enrollment and Update August 25, 2017 Enrollment Requirements Anne Santifer HealthCare Innovations Department of Human Services 2018 Enrollment Requirements A physician practice that is enrolled

More information

Compass PTN Core Measures

Compass PTN Core Measures Compass PTN Core Measures emeasure ID: CMS122v5 NQF: 0059 QualityID: 001 Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (>9%) Patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes with a visit during the measurement

More information

Provider Perspective of Quality Measurement

Provider Perspective of Quality Measurement Provider Perspective of Quality Measurement The American Medical Group Association supports its members in enhancing population health and care for patients through integrated systems of care Improve

More information

Lessons Learned from Meaningful Use Implementation. Cynthia L. Bero, MPH Partners HealthCare May 19, 2011

Lessons Learned from Meaningful Use Implementation. Cynthia L. Bero, MPH Partners HealthCare May 19, 2011 Lessons Learned from Meaningful Use Implementation Cynthia L. Bero, MPH Partners HealthCare May 9, 20 Meaningful Use Plan of Action Learn the HITECH program Certified EHR Technology. Analyze gap between

More information

2016 General Practice/Family Practice Preferred Specialty Measure Set

2016 General Practice/Family Practice Preferred Specialty Measure Set 1 0059 5 0081 41 N/A 50 N/A 65 0069, EHR 66 0002, EHR Effective Clinical Care Effective Clinical Care Effective Clinical Care Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (>9%): Percentage of patients

More information

MACRA Quality Payment Program Guide. Sample page. Simplifying Medicare MIPS & APM reporting for practitioners. Power up your coding optum360coding.

MACRA Quality Payment Program Guide. Sample page. Simplifying Medicare MIPS & APM reporting for practitioners. Power up your coding optum360coding. 2019 MACRA Quality Payment Program Guide Simplifying Medicare MIPS & APM reporting for practitioners Power up your coding optum360coding.com Contents Chapter 1. MACRA and the Quality Payment Program...

More information

2014 ACO GPRO Audit What this means for your practice. Sheree M. Arnold ACO Clinical Transformation Specialist

2014 ACO GPRO Audit What this means for your practice. Sheree M. Arnold ACO Clinical Transformation Specialist 2014 ACO GPRO Audit What this means for your practice Sheree M. Arnold ACO Clinical Transformation Specialist Agenda Catholic Medical Partners ACO overview Attribution and sampling of patients ACO quality

More information

Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) Model Proposed Quality Measures for Public Comment. Table of Contents

Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) Model Proposed Quality Measures for Public Comment. Table of Contents Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) Model Proposed Quality s for Public Comment Table of Contents Page # Introduction 3 Summaries by Domain Technical Expert Panel Recommended CEC Quality s 4 s that were recommended

More information

Colorado EHR Incentive Program By the Numbers

Colorado EHR Incentive Program By the Numbers Colorado EHR Incentive Program By the Numbers September 19, 2017 Micah L. Jones Department of Health Care Policy and Financing About the Speaker Micah L. Jones, J.D. Medicaid Health IT Coordinator Program

More information

2010 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative Measures Groups Specifications Manual

2010 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative Measures Groups Specifications Manual 2010 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative Measures Groups Specifications Manual This manual contains specific guidance for reporting 2010 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) Measures Groups.

More information

Consensus Core Set: ACO and PCMH / Primary Care Measures Version 1.0

Consensus Core Set: ACO and PCMH / Primary Care Measures Version 1.0 Consensus Core Set: ACO and PCMH / Primary Care s 0018 Controlling High Blood Pressure patients 18 to 85 years of age who had a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) and whose blood pressure (BP) was adequately

More information

GUARDIAN CMS QUALIFIED MIPS REGISTRY INFORMATION BRIEF

GUARDIAN CMS QUALIFIED MIPS REGISTRY INFORMATION BRIEF GUARDIAN CMS QUALIFIED MIPS REGISTRY INFORMATION BRIEF 2019 CHANGES IN THE CMS MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2015 (MACRA) QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM On November 1, 2018 CMS released the

More information

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Set Title Number CMS Reporting Method(s) Heart Failure (HF): Angiotensin- Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Therapy for

More information

2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) GPRO Web Interface Measures List 12/18/2015

2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) GPRO Web Interface Measures List 12/18/2015 2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Web Interface 12/18/2015 NQF, ) Care Coordination/Patient Safety (CARE) s (2 s Individually Sampled) CARE-2 Falls: Screening for Future Fall Risk Only #318

More information

Clinical Integration Quality Measures

Clinical Integration Quality Measures Clinical Integration Quality Measures Valley Integrated Care Network (VIPN) is physician-driven, with physicians determining which quality measures will be used to improve overall quality of care. Purpose:

More information

PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER

PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER DOCUMENT NUMBER: 2013-07 DATE: May 10, 2013 DOCUMENT TITLE: Proposed Uniform Data System Changes for Calendar Year 2014 TO: Health Centers Primary Care Associations Primary Care

More information

Meaningful Use & Million Hearts. Improving Cardiovascular Disease & Stroke Through Quality Measurements

Meaningful Use & Million Hearts. Improving Cardiovascular Disease & Stroke Through Quality Measurements Meaningful Use & Million Hearts Improving Cardiovascular Disease & Stroke Through Quality Measurements Phone lines are now muted Find this or any previous webinar, go to http://www.ehrhelp.missouri.edu

More information

2015 PQRS Registry. Source Measure Title Measure Description CITIUS1

2015 PQRS Registry. Source Measure Title Measure Description CITIUS1 1 CQ-IQ covers 65 CMS defined measures that Eligible Providers (EPs) have to report on to assess quality of care provided to the patients. Version Supported: PQRS Registry 2015 65 measures Reporting Period:

More information

Meaningful Use Stage 2: ONC Request for Comments. Ivy Baer, Jennifer Faerberg

Meaningful Use Stage 2: ONC Request for Comments. Ivy Baer, Jennifer Faerberg Meaningful Use Stage 2: ONC Request for Comments Ivy Baer, ibaer@aamc.org Jennifer Faerberg jfaerberg@aamc.org Stages of Meaningful Use By Payment Year First Payment Year Payment Year 2011 2012 2013 2014

More information

2013 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measures Groups Specifications Manual

2013 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measures Groups Specifications Manual 2013 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measures Groups Specifications Manual 12/19/2012 CPT only copyright 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT is a registered trademark

More information

RCCO Quality Indicators Crosswalk

RCCO Quality Indicators Crosswalk Aim: Better Care for Individuals (patient s perspective) RCCO Quality Indicators Crosswalk Quality Number 1. Access: timely care, appointments & info Denominator& Numerator ACO patients 18+ Data collection

More information

AdvantEdge Healthcare Solutions Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Resource Guide

AdvantEdge Healthcare Solutions Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Resource Guide \ 2013 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Resource Guide January 24, 2013 1 2013 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) January 3, 2013 We have created this PQRS Resource Guide so that the most

More information

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar 4

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar 4 CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar 4 Meaningful Use Data Capture and Configuration Clinical Quality Measures for Stage 1 and 2 August 14, 2014 Stephanie Rose, Project Director Desiree Railine, HIT Implementation

More information

Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) Reporting In PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) Reporting In PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017 Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) Reporting In PCC EHR Tim Proctor (tim@pcc.com) Users Conference 2017 Agenda Uses for CQM Reporting A review of each CQM report How they are calculated Required configuration

More information

Jeff Grant, President HCMA, Inc.

Jeff Grant, President HCMA, Inc. Meaningful Use Where Should You be Now? Jeff Grant, President HCMA, Inc. jeff@hcma-consulting.com www.hcma-consulting.com com Sponsored by: Compulink Business Systems, Inc. www.compulinkadvantage.com 800-456-4522

More information

2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes

2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes 11/10/2011 CPT only copyright 2011 American Medical Association.

More information

American Dental Education Association. Medicaid EHR Incentives Program

American Dental Education Association. Medicaid EHR Incentives Program American Dental Education Association Medicaid EHR Incentives Program Christopher Kenny King & Spalding, LLP 202-626-9253; ckenny@kslaw.com March 15, 2014 Agenda Quick overview of Stage 1 Meaningful Use

More information

Measure Owner Designation. AMA-PCPI/NCQA (contract) is the measure owner. AMA-PCPI is the measure owner. AMA-PCPI/ASCO/NCCN is the measure owner

Measure Owner Designation. AMA-PCPI/NCQA (contract) is the measure owner. AMA-PCPI is the measure owner. AMA-PCPI/ASCO/NCCN is the measure owner 2012 EHR Measure Specifications The specifications listed in this document have been updated to reflect clinical practice guidelines and applicable health informatics standards that are the most current

More information

2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes

2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes 0 CPT only copyright 2011 American Medical Association. All rights

More information

2011 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes

2011 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Release Notes CMS is pleased to announce the release of the 2011 Physician Quality

More information

Quality Care Plus 2015 Primary Care Physician Incentive Program. Now includes Medicare patients!

Quality Care Plus 2015 Primary Care Physician Incentive Program. Now includes Medicare patients! Quality Care Plus 2015 Primary Care Physician Incentive Program Now includes Medicare patients! Health Partners Plans (HPP) would like to express our appreciation for the invaluable role our primary care

More information

The table below includes the quality measures an ACO is required to submit to CMS as a participant in an MSSP Track 3 ACO

The table below includes the quality measures an ACO is required to submit to CMS as a participant in an MSSP Track 3 ACO The table below includes the quality measures an ACO is required to submit to CMS as a participant in an MSSP Track 3 ACO ACO-1 ACO-2 Getting Timely Care, Appointments, and Information How Well Your Providers

More information

CMS EHR Incentive Program: Proposed Rules for Stage 2 and Stage 3 Meaningful Use Focus on Eligible Hospitals

CMS EHR Incentive Program: Proposed Rules for Stage 2 and Stage 3 Meaningful Use Focus on Eligible Hospitals CMS EHR Incentive Program: Proposed Rules for Stage 2 and Stage 3 Meaningful Use Focus on Eligible Hospitals April 28, 2015 Hosted by: Sponsored by: Today s Event Sponsored By One of the nation s largest

More information

The Future of Cardiac Care: Managing Our Patients Together

The Future of Cardiac Care: Managing Our Patients Together The Future of Cardiac Care: Managing Our Patients Together Charles R. Caldwell, MD, FACC Disclosures: iheartdoc,inc. Telemedicine 1 MACRA Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 Repealed the

More information

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES Summary Table of Measures, Product Lines and Changes 1 SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES General Guidelines for Data Collection and Reporting Guidelines for Calculations and Sampling

More information

Measurement Name Beta-Blocker Therapy Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Measurement Name Beta-Blocker Therapy Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI) Program Metrics The list below includes the metrics that will be calculated by the PINNACLE Registry for the outpatient office setting. These include metrics for Artery, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension

More information

MEASURING CARE QUALITY

MEASURING CARE QUALITY MEASURING CARE QUALITY Region November 2016 For Clinical Effectiveness of Care Measures of Performance From: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS ) HEDIS is a set of standardized performance

More information

Joined in 2016 Previously IT Manager at RSNWO in Northwest Ohio AAS in Computer Programming A+ Certification in 2012 Microsoft Certified Professional

Joined in 2016 Previously IT Manager at RSNWO in Northwest Ohio AAS in Computer Programming A+ Certification in 2012 Microsoft Certified Professional Joined in 2016 Previously IT Manager at RSNWO in Northwest Ohio AAS in Computer Programming A+ Certification in 2012 Microsoft Certified Professional in SQL Server 2012/2014 Overview The material in this

More information

2010 PQRI M EASURE- A PPLICABILITY V ALIDATION P ROCESS FOR C LAIMS- B ASED R EPORTING OF I NDIVIDUAL M EASURES

2010 PQRI M EASURE- A PPLICABILITY V ALIDATION P ROCESS FOR C LAIMS- B ASED R EPORTING OF I NDIVIDUAL M EASURES The 2010 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) will include validation processes. Under the claims-based reporting method of individual measure(s), the determination of satisfactory reporting will

More information

2017 Stage 1 & 2 Medicaid Meaningful Use Guide

2017 Stage 1 & 2 Medicaid Meaningful Use Guide 2017 Stage 1 & 2 Medicaid Meaningful Use Guide CONTENTS MEANINGFUL USE INTRODUCTION... 3 USING THIS GUIDE... 5 OBJECTIVES, MEASURES, CRITERIA & REQUIRED ANCILLARY SERVICES... 6 HOW TO RUN A MEANINGFUL

More information

2016 PQRS Recommended Measures for: General/Family Practice

2016 PQRS Recommended Measures for: General/Family Practice Measures Groups Choose 1 Measures Group Report on a minimum of 20 eligible patients (at least 11 must be Medicare Part B FFS patients) #130: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record #204:

More information

The Role of Health Information Technology in Implementing Disease Management Programs

The Role of Health Information Technology in Implementing Disease Management Programs The Role of Health Information Technology in Implementing Disease Management Programs Donald F. Wilson, MD Medical Director Quality Insights of Pennsylvania May 11, 2006 Statewide Combined Topic Average

More information

PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER

PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER DOCUMENT NUMBER: 2015-01 DATE: November 25, 2014 DOCUMENT TITLE: Proposed Uniform Data System Changes for Calendar Year 2015 TO: Health Centers Primary Care Associations Primary

More information

New PINNACLE Measures The below measures for PINNACLE will be added as new measures to the outcomes reporting starting with Version 2.0.

New PINNACLE Measures The below measures for PINNACLE will be added as new measures to the outcomes reporting starting with Version 2.0. New PINNACLE Measures The below measures for PINNACLE will be added as new measures to the outcomes reporting starting with Version 2.0. Measure Steward Measure Name Measure Description Rationale for Adding

More information

Quality Payment Program: A Closer Look at the Proposed Rule for Year 3

Quality Payment Program: A Closer Look at the Proposed Rule for Year 3 Quality Payment Program: A Closer Look at the Proposed Rule for Year 3 Sandy Swallow and Michelle Brunsen August 21, 2018 1 This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network

More information

Abstract. Introduction. Providers stand to lose $1.15 billion in CMS reimbursements under MU

Abstract. Introduction. Providers stand to lose $1.15 billion in CMS reimbursements under MU Abstract As of November 1, 2014, only 2% of eligible professionals had attested to Meaningful Use 2 1. This is not good news for the thousands of independent physician practices that rely on Medicare payments:

More information

STI Presents MIPS: SETTING UP QUALITY MEASURES THIS PRESENTATION WILL BEGIN AT IT S SCHEDULED TIME: 9AM

STI Presents MIPS: SETTING UP QUALITY MEASURES THIS PRESENTATION WILL BEGIN AT IT S SCHEDULED TIME: 9AM STI Presents MIPS: SETTING UP QUALITY MEASURES THIS PRESENTATION WILL BEGIN AT IT S SCHEDULED TIME: 9AM Today we will cover: 2 2017 Quality Category Requirements Selecting Quality Measures Setting up Quality

More information

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield (ABCBS) Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Specifications Manual

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield (ABCBS) Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Specifications Manual Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield (ABCBS) Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Specifications Manual 2017 This document is a guide to the 2017 Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield Patient-Centered Medical

More information

MIPS Improvement Activities: Building Blocks for Value and Quality Care

MIPS Improvement Activities: Building Blocks for Value and Quality Care MIPS Improvement Activities: Building Blocks for Value and Quality Care Agenda Basics of MIPS MIPS 2017 The MIPS-Medicaid MU relationship Improvement activities as building blocks Improvement Activity

More information

HEDIS/CAHPS 101 August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup

HEDIS/CAHPS 101 August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup HEDIS/CAHPS 101 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup MNsure s Accessibility & Equal Opportunity (AEO) office can provide this information in accessible formats for individuals with disabilities.

More information

Measuring and Improving Quality in Accountable Care Organizations

Measuring and Improving Quality in Accountable Care Organizations Measuring and Improving Quality in Accountable Care Organizations Joachim Roski, PhD MPH Fellow, Economic Studies Managing Director, High Value Healthcare Initiative Overview ACOs and health care reform

More information