Criterion Validity of Facets versus Domains of the Big Five Inventory
|
|
- Ursula Snow
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Individual Differences Research 2014, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp Individual Differences Association, Inc. ISSN: X Criterion Validity of Facets versus Domains of the Big Five Inventory Ronald C. Feldt*, Jen Lee, & Dennis Dew Mount Mercy University *Ronald C. Feldt; Department o f Psychology, Social Work, Sociology, and International Studies; Mount Mercy University; Cedar Rapids, IA, 52402; rfeldt@mtmercy.edu ( ). ABSTRACT - The study investigated the two-facet-scale structure within each domain of the 44- item Big Five Inventory investigated by Soto and John (2009). Undergraduate college students participated (N = 295). First, results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit for the two-facet structure for each domain. Next, we examined criterion validity of facets versus domains for predicting three measures relevant to social cognitive career theory (SCOT): goal instability, personal satisfaction with career development, and life satisfaction. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated improved prediction of SCOT measures when BFI facet scores were used as predictors rather than domain scores. The Big Five Inventory (BFI) (John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008) is one of several brief measures of the Big Five personality model (John, 1990) that provides reliable and valid assessment of the five broad personality domains (i.e., factors). Domains (e.g., conscientiousness) are composites of specific facets (i.e., traits) (e.g., self-discipline, order, etc.). Use of a brief measure of the Big Five has the major advantage of providing assessment of the broad domains within a 10-min session using only 44 items, in contrast to a min session required for the 240-item NEO-PI-R that includes six facets per domain. The main disadvantage is loss of some trait-level information. For example, results of a meta-analysis of the Big Five personality model revealed no significant differences between males and females on the openness domain (Costa, Terracciano, & McCrae, 2001). However, in that meta-analysis, significant sex differences were observed for five of the six facets of openness. In other words, domain mean scores may be similar between groups, but may mask group differences on facets within the domains. Facet information has been demonstrated to be useful in prediction of academic achievement (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001), law enforcement training (Vasilopoulos, Cucina, & Hunter, 2007), job performance (Rothstein & Goffm, 2006), and workplace deviance (Hastings & O Neill, 2009). Because facet information can improve prediction in applied settings, use of a brief measure that maintains facet information may prove to be useful in settings such as career counseling with college students. Recent evidence indicates that the 44-item BFI may also provide facet-level information. Soto and John (2009) identified 10 facet-level scales of the BFI. Their analysis supported a two-factor structure corresponding to two facets within each of the five domains. The domains (and corresponding facets) include neuroticism (anxiety, 112
2 depression), extraversion (activity, assertiveness), openness (aesthetics, ideas), agreeableness (altruism, compliance), and conscientiousness (order, self-discipline). However, no known research has replicated the two-factor structure, nor has any study investigated the criterion-related validity of the 10 facets in the BFI. Furthermore, no studies have examined the BFI s validity for predicting career development from personality. Regarding the influence of personality on work, educational, and life satisfaction, previous studies examined neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness using SCCT models (Lent & Brown, 2006; Lent et ah, 2005). Generally, each of these three domains is significantly correlated with life satisfaction (Hayes & Joseph, 2003). More specifically, the less neurotic and more extraverted and conscientious a person is, the greater the life satisfaction that is reported. At the facet level of analysis, strength of relationship varies across Big Five facets such that the facets depression, warmth, assertiveness, altruism, and self-discipline are correlated with life satisfaction (Quevedo & Abella, 2011). Within the neuroticism domain, the facets depression, vulnerability, and self-consciousness correlate negatively with life satisfaction. Within the extraversion domain, the facets positive emotion, assertiveness, and gregariousness correlate positively with life satisfaction. (Schimmack, Oishi, Furr, & Funder, 2004). A facet-level analysis of work satisfaction indicates that assertiveness is significantly correlated (Lounsbury et ah, 2003; Lounsbury, Park, Sundstrom, Williamson, & Pemberton, 2004). In addition, neuroticism and extroversion are significant predictors of goal orientation (Wang & Erdheim, 2007). Neuroticism and conscientiousness are indirectly related to personal goal setting at work (Renn, Allen, & Huning, 2011). Because the literature supports the use of measuring facet-level information in predicting work satisfaction, it is important to determine if the BFI is an acceptable way of maintaining facet level information in a shorter format. To address the gaps in the understanding of the BFI s facet-level measurement, the aims of the present study were to: (a) examine the psychometric properties of the facet scales, (b) compare the fit of one- and two-factor (facet) models (Soto & John, 2009) for each of the five domains, and (c) investigate the criterion validity of domain and facet models for predicting measures of importance to career development in undergraduate students. The measures we selected to investigate how the BFI may predict measures of career development were based in key constructs of the social cognitive career theory (SCCT) (Lent & Brown, 2006; Lent et ah, 2005) that are indicative of careerdevelopment progress: failure to set orienting goals, satisfaction with progress in career development, and life satisfaction. Given the importance of neuroticism, extroversion, and conscientiousness in SCCT s models and evidence that these domains and facets of these domains predict goal orientation and life/work satisfaction, we hypothesized that: (a) Goal instability, the failure to set orienting goals (Robbins & Patton, 1985), would be predicted by the facets anxiety, depression (neuroticism), assertiveness (extraversion), and self-discipline (conscientiousness), (b) Satisfaction with progress in career development would be predicted by depression, assertiveness, altruism, and self-discipline, (c) Life satisfaction would be predicted by depression, assertiveness, altruism, and self-discipline. 113
3 Method Participants Participants were 299 undergraduate students from a small Midwestern university who were recruited from psychology classes and received extra course credit for their participation. Data for 4 participants were excluded for failure to complete all instruments, thus the final sample was 295 (79% women). Participants age ranged from 18 to 52 years (M= 20.9; SD = 5.1). The sample was 93% Caucasian. Measures and Procedure The following instruments were completed in a classroom setting: Personality. The 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) (John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008) assesses the five domains of the Big Five (i.e., openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) using a 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly) Likert scale. Soto and John (2009) identified two facets for each of the five domains (number of items and Cronbach s coefficient alpha for each facet): (a) neuroticism includes anxiety (four,.83) and depression (two,.53); (b) extraversion includes assertiveness (five,.83) and activity (two,.76); (c) openness includes aesthetics (three,.78) and ideas (five,.71); (d) agreeableness includes altruism (four,.68) and compliance (three,.61); and (e) conscientiousness includes order (two,.56) and selfdiscipline (five,.75). Personal career development satisfaction (PCDS). Five items were written to measure degree of personal satisfaction with career development (e.g., I am pleased with my initiative in planning for a career that best suits me. ). The Likert scale ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Cronbach s coefficient alpha was.83. Life satisfaction. Life satisfaction was assessed with the five-item Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) (alpha =.87). The Likert scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Goal orientation. The Goal Instability Scale (GIS) (Robbins & Patton, 1985) is a 10- item measure of the extent to which students fail to set orienting goals (alpha =.81). The Likert scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Data were centered prior to any data analysis to control for response acquiescence and disacquiescence (Soto, John, Gosling, & Potter, 2008). For all analyses, univariate and multivariate normality were within normal limits with no evidence of singularity or multicollinearity. Maximum likelihood estimation was used. Working within each personality domain, model fit was examined for three models: (a) a unidimensional model that included the items that normally represent the broad domains (e.g., eight items, neuroticism) (Model 1), (b) a unidimensional model that included the items that make up the two-factor facets suggested by Soto and John (2009) (Model 2), and (c) a two-factor model that included two facets (Model 3). The following fit indexes were used to determine goodness of fit for each of the three models: the comparative fit index (CFI) (Bentler, 1990), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (Steiger, 1990), and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). Cutoffs that indicate good fit are CFI >.95, RMSEA <.05, and SRMR <.08, and cutoffs 114
4 that indicate acceptable fit are CFI >.90, but <.95, and RMSEA >.05, but <.08 (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Tanaka, 1993). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (Akaike, 1987) and the expected cross validation index (ECVI) (Browne & Cudeck, 1993) were used for comparison of nonnested models. Smaller values indicate a better fitting model. Results Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit index values are displayed in Table 1. For BFI facets, the best fitting model was clearly the two-factor model. The fit of the two-factor model based on CFI, RMSEA, and SRMR was good for agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and neuroticism, and it was acceptable for openness. The two-factor model (Model 3) was the best fitting model for neuroticism, extraversion, and openness, and it fit about as well as Model 2 (unidimensional) for agreeableness and conscientiousness. There was no indication that items were cross-loaded or that model fit could be improved by the addition of a crossloaded item. Table 1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis o f Domain versus Facet Models Domain Model d f CFI RMSEA SRMR AIC ECVI Neuroticism i (.07,.11) (.26,.43) (.07,.14) (.16,.29) (.02,.10) (.12,.20) Extraversion (.05,.10) (.22,.37) (.06,.12) (.20,.34) (.00,.07) (.15,.21) Openness (.10,.13) (.58,.85) (.11,.15) (.40,.63) (.05,.10) (.22,.36) Agreeablcness (.00,.06) (.21,.31) (.00,.06) (.14,.19) (.00,.06) (.15,.20) Conscientiousness (.00,.02) (.21,.23) (.00,.02) (.14,.15) (.00,.03) (.15,.16) Note. Model 1 is a unidimensional domain model with original items. Model 2 is a unidimensional domain model with items specific to the two-factor model. Model 3 is the two-factor (facet) model (Soto & John, 2009). CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation (with 90% confidence interval); SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; AIC = the Akaike Infonnation Criterion; ECVI = expected cross-validation index (with 90% confidence interval). Cronbach s coefficient alpha estimates and means and standard deviations are displayed in Table 2. Reliability of criterion measures ranged from.83 to.88. Reliability estimates (coefficient alpha) were <.60 for several facets of the BFI. Zero-order 115
5 correlation coefficients for relationships between facet measures and social-cognitive measures are displayed in Table 2. Table 2 Reliability Estimates, Descriptive Statistics, and Zero-Order Correlation Coefficientsh fo r Relationships between Domains, Facets, and Criterion Measures Criterion Measures (rb) Domain/Facets Alpha1* M SD GIS PCDS SWLS Neuroticism Anxiety Depression Extraversion Activity Assertiveness Openness Aesthetics Ideas Agreeableness Altruism Compliance Conscientiousness Order Self-Discipline Note. Cronbach s coefficient alpha; GIS = Goal Instability Scale, PCDS = Personal Career Development Satisfaction, and SWLS = Satisfaction With Life Scale. Means and standard deviations were calculated before centering (control for response acquiescence). Critical values (two-tailed) for correlation coefficients are.115 (alpha =.05) and.150 (alpha =.01). Criterion-Related Validity Given evidence of acceptable model fit, we proceeded with multiple regression analysis to compare domain- and facet-level prediction. We used hierarchical linear regression with domain- or facet-level predictors added to the model as a block after gender. Adjusted R2 was used for model comparisons given that domain and facet models differed in total number of predictors. For each criterion variable, three sets of models were compared: (a) We first examined the fit of the hypothesized facet-level model and the regression weights of the facet-level predictors, (b) We then compared facet and domain models by including the domains of the hypothesized models. A moderate decrease in R2 for the domain model relative to that of the hypothesized facet model would show evidence of the predictive advantage of facet models, (c) The third set of models included other facets of the same domains of the hypothesized models to determine whether facets are interchangeable as predictors. We refer to these as otherfacet models. If facets within each domain are redundant, i.e., do not contribute uniquely to the predictive relationship, then R2 should not change in magnitude. For example, whether assertiveness or activity is used, either will predict equally well. On the other hand, a significant reduction in R2 would indicate that prediction is best when a unique combination of facet-level predictors is employed. Results are displayed in Table 3. Adjusted R2 values were larger for facet models than for domain models. Facet models accounted for more predictable variance: 11%, 6%, and 116
6 Feldt.../Individual Differences Research, 2014, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp % for GIS, PCDS, and SWLS, respectively. In addition, comparison of hypothesizedand other-facet models indicated significant decreases in R2 for other-facet models: Adjusted R2 was.39,.13, and.13 for GIS, PCDS, and SWLS, respectively. Hypothesized facet models accounted for more predictable variance than other-facet models, with a difference of 12.9%, 9.3%, and 12.8% for GIS, PCDS, and SWLS, respectively. For GIS, it should be noted that the percentage decrease was minimized due to the fact that two facets of the neuroticism domain were included in both hypothesized- and other-facet models. Table 3 Facet- versus Domain-Level Prediction with Hierarchical Regression Analysis (TV = 295) Criterion Step Facet Predictors RJ P, Domain Predictors R2 a GIS i Gender,00f -.03 Gender,00f Anxiety.52'.16b Neuroticism.49'.28' Depression.17' Extraversion -.19' Assertiveness -.14' Conscientiousness -.46' Self- Discipline -.51' PCDS 1 Gender.01* -.12* Gender.01* Self-Discipline.22'.30' Agreeableness.20' -15b Altruism.16b Conscientiousness.35' Depression -.13 SWLS 1 Gender.02b -,16b Gender,02b -,16b 2 Depression.25' -.34' Neuroticism.20' -.24' Assertiveness.12* Extra vers ion.14 Altruism.11 Agreeableness.11 Self-Discipline.12 Conscientiousness.11 Note. GIS = Goal Instability Scale, PCDS = Personal Career Development Satisfaction, and SWLS = Satisfaction With Life Scale. R2 = adjusted R2. p <.05; bp <.01; cp <.001; d p >.05 and <.10; p >.10. Deletion of outliers for goal instability and life satisfaction resulted in increases in R2, with R2 =.55 and R2 =.27 in GIS and SWLS models, respectively. No change in statistical significance of regression weights was observed for GIS with minimal change in the magnitude of regression weights for assertiveness, altruism, and self-discipline. In contrast, deletion of outliers for the predictive model of PCDS had a small influence on R2 (R2 =.23). However, regression weights for depression were no longer statistically significant when the outliers were omitted from the analysis. Closer inspection of the PCDS outliers revealed that they could be considered influential and also interesting outliers (Aguinis, Gottfredson, & Joo, 2013). The five participants (three women and two men) had the lowest values on PCDS, i.e., these participants were the least satisfied with their career development progress. Additional analysis indicated that four of the five had not decided on a career. We examined whether this group differed on personality facets, age, and other criterion measures. Results indicated no difference in age. However, the five participants scored higher than other participants on goal instability, ((293) = 3.62, p <.01, and lower on self-discipline, order, 117
7 and life satisfaction, with 1 values (df= 293 for all comparisons) equal to 2.77, 3.24, and 3.74, respectively (allp <.01). Supplementary analysis involved comparisons of the best combination of domain predictors versus the best combination of facet predictors. For comparisons, we utilized stepwise regression analysis. Although stepwise regression capitalizes on chance, it points to the possibility that a unique combination of predictors, each accounting for some increment in R2 when added to the model, outweighs the unique combination of domain predictors. Comparison of adjusted R2 values indicated that facets predicted better than domains, with percentage increases of 4.4%, 8.2%, and 37.6% for careerdevelopment satisfaction, goal instability, and life satisfaction, respectively. Discussion The primary purposes of the study were to investigate the degree of fit of the twofacet model (Soto & John, 2009) for each domain and to compare facet- and domainlevel prediction of SCCT constructs. Soto and John (2009) selected facet items based on conceptual judgment and the extent to which facet measures converged with NEO-PI-R facet measures. Our study confirms the two-facet structure within each domain. In addition, our results indicated a slight advantage for use of facets over domains for predicting career-development criteria. This finding is consistent with results of previous studies in which an advantage of facet-level prediction has been observed (Hastings & O Neill, 2009; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001; Rothstein & Goffin, 2006; Vasilopoulos, et al., 2007). Although Big Five domains are frequently used for analysis of career progression and satisfaction, some research has demonstrated significant relationships between facets relevant to the Big Five. Assertiveness and optimism are positively related to career satisfaction in several occupational groups (Lounsbury et ah, 2003; Lounsbury, et ah, 2004). Ideas, aesthetics, and self-discipline have shown incremental validity beyond the broad domains of the Big Five for predicting college GPA and course selection (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001). In addition, O Connor and Paunonen s (2007) meta-analysis indicated significant prediction of academic performance by self-discipline, ideas, aesthetics, activity, and anxiety, however, they noted that the number of studies that included a facet-level analysis was small. The trend to use brief measures may be motivated by use of multiple instruments within a brief session when time is restricted or to avoid participant boredom and fatigue. However, brief measures may have low reliability and increase probabilities of Type I and Type II errors when investigating relationships with criterion variables (Crede, Harms, Niehorster, & Gaye-Valentine, 2012). Utility of brief measures may depend upon willingness of researchers to favor brief measures of narrow facets at the cost of reliability and possible underestimation of strength of relationships. Some researchers may be reluctant to use the BFI facets because of low reliability estimates, which are primarily based on Cronbach s coefficient alpha, and their belief that measures should exhibit an alpha estimate of.70. This value has been questioned (Cortina, 1993; John & Soto, 2007) because of its susceptibility to reflect scale length (number of items) and narrowness or homogeneity of item content (John & Soto, 2007; McCrae, Kurtz, Yamagata, & Terracciano, 2011; Schmitt, 1996). It should be noted that the NEO-PI-R 118
8 Feldt.../IndividualDifferences Research, 2014, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp facets do not necessarily exceed the standard of.70, with 13 of 30 facet scales having alpha values less than.70 in the normative sample and 9 in a student sample (McCrae et al., 2011). In addition, two studies that included undergraduate college students reported low coefficients of a brief measure of the Big Five domains, the BFI-10 (Rammstedt & John, 2007), which ranged from.37 to.72 across the two studies (M=.54), with only one coefficient exceeding.70. However, criterion validities were comparable to those of longer measures (Crede et al., 2012; Thalmayer, Saucier, & Eigenhuis, 2011). Implications for counseling include use of the BFI for brief assessment of personality within a counseling session to provide a profile of traits that may impede progress in career development. If a shift in assessment is to focus on aspects of personality that correlate with adaptability, preparedness, and coping with barriers that are likely to impede career development (Lent, 2013), such facets may have utility for identifying individuals who are likely to successfully negotiate barriers. Whether interest in personality is to facilitate degree of match between personality characteristics and specific environments, identifying characteristics that are likely to lead to successful career success and satisfaction, or negotiate obstacles for uncertain career opportunities (Lent, 2013), personality assessment will continue to make important contributions. Personality matters in career interests and self-efficacy, career development, career choice, job performance, and job satisfaction (Larson & Borgen, 2006, p. 308). Implications for research include use of a brief Big Five measure that provides traitlevel analysis when researchers wish to use multiple instruments to assess personality and career-related criteria when time is at a premium. Given that facet-level prediction is best when expert judges select facets for regression models as opposed to randomly selecting facets (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001), we suspect that careful selection of BFI facets based on theory and prior research should result in a similar observed advantage for predicting career development criteria. A facet-level analysis appears to be possible for most of the 10 facets. Given the degree of overlap between predictor and criterion content, researchers could judiciously select which facets to include in their research. Limitations of the study include a relatively homogeneous sample of Caucasian undergraduate college students, which limits the generalizability of results. Additional research with a more diverse sample is needed to further demonstrate psychometric properties and criterion-related validity of the BFI facets. References Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, orm.sagepub.com. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal o f Applied Psychology, 78,
9 Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal o f Personality and Social Psychology, 81, Crede, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal o f Personality Assessment, 49, Hastings, S. E., & O Neill, T. A. (2009). Predicting workplace deviance using broad versus narrow personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, John, O. P. (1990). The 'Big Five' factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin, (Ed.), Handbook o f personality: Theory and research (pp ). New York, NY: Guilford Press. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook o f personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.) (pp ). New York, NY: Guilford Press. John, O. P., & Soto, C. J. (2007). The importance of being valid: Reliability and the process of construct validation. In R. W. Robins, R. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook o f research methods in personality psychology (pp ). New York, NY US: Guilford. Larson, L. M., & Borgen, F. H. (2006). Do personality traits contribute to vocational selfefficacy?. Journal o f Career Assessment, 14, Lent, R. W. (2013). Career-life preparedness: Revisiting career planning and adjustment in the new workplace. The Career Development Quarterly, 61, Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal o f Vocational Behavior, 69, Lent, R. W., Singley, D., Sheu, H., Gainor, K. A., Brenner, B. R., Treistman, D., & Ades, L. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of domain and life satisfaction: Exploring the theoretical precursors of subjective well-being. Journal o f Counseling Psychology, 52, Lounsbury, J. W., Loveland, J. M., Sundstrom, E. D., Gibson, L. W., Drost, A. W., & Hamrick, F. L. (2003). An investigation of personality traits in relation to career satisfaction. Journal o f Career Assessment, 11, Lounsbury, J. W., Park, S., Sundstrom, E., Williamson, J. M., & Pemberton, A. E. (2004). Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal o f Career Assessment, 12,
10 McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, O'Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of postsecondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal o f Personality and Social Psychology, 81, Quevedo, R., & Abella, M. (2011). Well-being and personality: Facet-level analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10- item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal o f Research in Personality, 41, Renn, R. W., Allen, D. G., & Huning, T. M. (2011). Empirical examination of the individual-level personality-based theory of self-management failure. Journal o f Organizational Behavior, 32, Robbins, S. B., & Patton, M. J. (1985). Self-psychology and career development: Construction of the Superiority and Goal Instability scales.journal o f Counseling Psychology, 32, Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?. Human Resource Management Review, 16, Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psvchologv Bulletin, 30, Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal o f Research in Personality, 43, Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal o f Personality and Social Psychology, 94, Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Thalmayer, A., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., & Hunter, A. E. (2007). Personality and training proficiency: Issues of bandwidth-fidelity and curvilinearity. Journal o f Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80,
11 Wang, M., & Erdheim, J. (2007). Does the five-factor model of personality relate to goal orientation?. Personality and Individual Differences, 43,
12 Copyright of Individual Differences Research is the property of Individual Differences Research and its content may not be copied or ed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or articles for individual use.
Extraversion. The Extraversion factor reliability is 0.90 and the trait scale reliabilities range from 0.70 to 0.81.
MSP RESEARCH NOTE B5PQ Reliability and Validity This research note describes the reliability and validity of the B5PQ. Evidence for the reliability and validity of is presented against some of the key
More informationPersonality as Predictors of Academic Achievement among University Students
The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 3, Issue 3, No. 6, DIP: 18.01.100/20160303 ISBN: 978-1-365-11998-9 http://www.ijip.in April - June, 2016 Personality
More informationThe happy personality: Mediational role of trait emotional intelligence
Personality and Individual Differences 42 (2007) 1633 1639 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Short Communication The happy personality: Mediational role of trait emotional intelligence Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
More informationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) PSYSOC 2013
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) 506 510 PSYSOC 2013 Personality Traits and Different Career Stages A Study on Indian School
More informationUSING PERSONALITY TESTS IN RESEARCH: ARE LONGER TESTS NECESSARILY BETTER?
Chapter #23 USING PERSONALITY TESTS IN RESEARCH: ARE LONGER TESTS NECESSARILY BETTER? David Freeze 1, Tracy A. Freeze 2, Lisa A. Best 1, & Kathryn E. Flood 1 1 Department of Psychology, University of New
More informationAutobiographical memory as a dynamic process: Autobiographical memory mediates basic tendencies and characteristic adaptations
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Research in Personality 42 (2008) 1060 1066 Brief Report Autobiographical memory as a dynamic process: Autobiographical memory mediates basic tendencies
More informationPersonality Traits Effects on Job Satisfaction: The Role of Goal Commitment
Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Management Faculty Research Management, Marketing and MIS Fall 11-14-2009 Personality Traits Effects on Job Satisfaction: The Role of Goal Commitment Wai Kwan
More informationDevelopment of Big Five Domains and Facets in Adulthood: Mean-Level Age Trends and Broadly Versus Narrowly Acting Mechanisms
Development of Big Five Domains and Facets in Adulthood: Mean-Level Age Trends and Broadly Versus Narrowly Acting Mechanisms Christopher J. Soto 1 and Oliver P. John 2 1 Colby College 2 University of California,
More informationRunning head: EXAMINATION OF THE BIG FIVE 1
Running head: EXAMINATION OF THE BIG FIVE 1 Format your title page according to your university guidelines. *This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from an original paper by a student. Used
More informationThe Doctrine of Traits. Lecture 29
The Doctrine of Traits Lecture 29 1 The Doctrine of Traits Allport (1937) [A trait is] a generalized and focalized neuropsychic system... with the capacity to render many stimuli functionally equivalent,
More informationExamining the efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand pre-service teachers intention to use technology*
Examining the efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand pre-service teachers intention to use technology* Timothy Teo & Chwee Beng Lee Nanyang Technology University Singapore This
More informationBig five personality traits and coping styles predict subjective wellbeing: A study with a Turkish Sample
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 12 (2011) 426 435 577 581 International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2010) Big five personality
More informationIndividual Conceptions of Well-Being Predict Psychological and Subjective Well-Being: Beyond the Big Five (Book Chapter)
Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Faculty Research Publications (All Departments) Faculty Research 2013 Individual Conceptions of Well-Being Predict Psychological and Subjective Well-Being:
More informationFifty scales of grey? - A common analysis of dominance self-report scales
Fifty scales of grey? - A common analysis of dominance self-report scales Carolin Palmer 13th European Conference on Psychological Assessment July 22-25, 2015 Zurich, Switzerland what is dominance? dominance
More informationIJPSS Volume 2, Issue 7 ISSN:
Teachers` as a Leader and their Traits: Evidence from secondary level Dr.Tahseen Mehmood Aslam* Zulfiqar Ali** Ijaz Ahmad Tatlah*** Dr Muhammad Iqbal**** _ Abstract Teacher must act as a leader because
More informationRelationship between Teachers' Personality Traits and Self Efficacy: An Empirical Analysis of School Teachers in Karaikal Region (Puducherry)
Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2015 Relationship between Teachers' Personality Traits and Self Efficacy: An Empirical Analysis of School Teachers in Karaikal Region (Puducherry) Dr. N. S. PANDEY Assistant
More informationAn Evaluation of the Consequences of Using Short Measures of the Big Five Personality Traits
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Management Department Faculty Publications Management Department 2012 An Evaluation of the Consequences of Using Short Measures
More informationFACETS AND WELL-BEING 1. Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: Incremental Prediction from 30 Facets over the Big 5
FACETS AND WELL-BEING 1 Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: Incremental Prediction from 30 Facets over the Big 5 Jeromy Anglim, Sharon Grant 1 Citation Information: Anglim,
More informationSocial Cognitive Predictors of Adjustment to Engineering by Underrepresented Students
1 Social Cognitive Predictors of Adjustment to Engineering by Underrepresented Students Robert W. Lent, Matthew J. Miller, Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland; Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Tech University;
More informationDOES SELF-EMPLOYED WORK MAKE 15-YEAR LONGITUDINAL PERSONALITY- BASED ANALYSIS
Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research Volume 35 Issue 3 CHAPTER III. THE ENTREPRENEUR AND CHARACTERISTICS Article 2 6-13-2015 DOES SELF-EMPLOYED WORK MAKE INDIVIDUALS NOT ONLY MORE ENTREPRENEURIAL BUT
More informationEmotional Intelligence and Leadership
The Mayer Salovey Caruso Notes Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) 2 The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) 2 The MSCEIT 2 measures four related abilities. 3 Perceiving Facilitating
More informationRunning head: CFA OF STICSA 1. Model-Based Factor Reliability and Replicability of the STICSA
Running head: CFA OF STICSA 1 Model-Based Factor Reliability and Replicability of the STICSA The State-Trait Inventory of Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA; Ree et al., 2008) is a new measure of anxiety
More informationPersonality Traits and Life Satisfaction among Working Men and Women
Personality Traits and Life Satisfaction among Working Men and Women Azra Khanam Education University Lahore Campus, Pakistan Abstract The present research investigated personality traits and life satisfaction
More informationConfirmatory Factor Analysis of the Procrastination Assessment Scale for Students
611456SGOXXX10.1177/2158244015611456SAGE OpenYockey and Kralowec research-article2015 Article Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Procrastination Assessment Scale for Students SAGE Open October-December
More informationThe Nature and Structure of Correlations Among Big Five Ratings: The Halo-Alpha-Beta Model
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/40455341 The Nature and Structure of Correlations Among Big Five Ratings: The Halo-Alpha-Beta
More informationWork Personality Index Factorial Similarity Across 4 Countries
Work Personality Index Factorial Similarity Across 4 Countries Donald Macnab Psychometrics Canada Copyright Psychometrics Canada 2011. All rights reserved. The Work Personality Index is a trademark of
More informationThe hierarchical structure of emotional expressivity: scale development and nomological implications
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations Spring 2010 The hierarchical structure of emotional expressivity: scale development and nomological implications John Jeffrey Humrichouse
More informationPersonality, academic majors and performance: Revealing complex patterns Author(s): Vedel, A., Thomsen, D. K., & Larsen, L.
Coversheet This is the accepted manuscript (post-print version) of the article. Contentwise, the post-print version is identical to the final published version, but there may be differences in typography
More informationModeling the Influential Factors of 8 th Grades Student s Mathematics Achievement in Malaysia by Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences (IJAAS) Vol. 3, No. 4, December 2014, pp. 172~177 ISSN: 2252-8814 172 Modeling the Influential Factors of 8 th Grades Student s Mathematics Achievement
More informationCollege Student Self-Assessment Survey (CSSAS)
13 College Student Self-Assessment Survey (CSSAS) Development of College Student Self Assessment Survey (CSSAS) The collection and analysis of student achievement indicator data are of primary importance
More informationTRAIT SCALE LENGTH, WIDTH, BALANCE, AND VALIDITY 1
TRAIT SCALE LENGTH, WIDTH, BALANCE, AND VALIDITY 1 Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (in press). Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external
More informationPersonality and Social Psychology
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2011, 52, 43 48 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00826.x Personality and Social Psychology Be yourself, believe in yourself, and be happy: Self-efficacy as a mediator between
More informationCultural Intelligence: A Predictor of Ethnic Minority College Students Psychological Wellbeing
From the SelectedWorks of Teresa A. Smith March 29, 2012 Cultural Intelligence: A Predictor of Ethnic Minority College Students Psychological Wellbeing Teresa A. Smith Available at: https://works.bepress.com/teresa_a_smith/2/
More informationASSESSING THE UNIDIMENSIONALITY, RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND FITNESS OF INFLUENTIAL FACTORS OF 8 TH GRADES STUDENT S MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT IN MALAYSIA
1 International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR.org Volume 1, Issue 2, MAY 2013, Online: ASSESSING THE UNIDIMENSIONALITY, RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND FITNESS OF INFLUENTIAL FACTORS OF 8 TH GRADES STUDENT
More informationValidation of the Integration of Stressful Life Experiences Scale Short Form in a Bereaved Sample
Death Studies, 38: 234 238, 2014 Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0748-1187 print=1091-7683 online DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2013.829369 Validation of the Integration of Stressful Life Experiences
More informationAbstract. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange Vol.4, No.2 June 30 (2018), pp
Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange Vol.4, No.2 June 30 (2018), pp. 43-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/apjcri.2018.06.05 Abstract The present study was intended to analyse discriminant
More informationSociodemographic Effects on the Test-Retest Reliability of the Big Five Inventory. Timo Gnambs. Osnabrück University. Author Note
Running head: TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY Sociodemographic Effects on the Test-Retest Reliability of the Big Five Inventory Timo Gnambs Osnabrück University Author Note Timo Gnambs, Institute of Psychology,
More informationPersonality: Definitions
Personality: Definitions Anastasi "Personality tests are instruments for the measurement of emotional, motivational, interpersonal and attitudinal characteristics, as distinct from abilities. Kaplan &
More informationDifferences in stress responses : Match effects in gender, ethnicity, and social support van Well, S.M.
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Differences in stress responses : Match effects in gender, ethnicity, and social support van Well, S.M. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA):
More informationRosenthal, Montoya, Ridings, Rieck, and Hooley (2011) Appendix A. Supplementary material
NPI Factors and 16-Item NPI Rosenthal, Montoya, Ridings, Rieck, and Hooley (2011) Table 2 examines the relation of four sets of published factor-based NPI subscales and a shortened version of the NPI to
More informationInternational Conference on Humanities and Social Science (HSS 2016)
International Conference on Humanities and Social Science (HSS 2016) The Chinese Version of WOrk-reLated Flow Inventory (WOLF): An Examination of Reliability and Validity Yi-yu CHEN1, a, Xiao-tong YU2,
More informationAre there personality traits that predispose applicants to fake noncognitive measures in personnel selection?
Review of Psychology, Original scientific paper 2012, Vol. 19, No. 1, 29-36 UDC 159.923.3 Are there personality traits that predispose applicants to fake noncognitive measures in personnel selection? MAŠA
More informationA Structured Interview for the Assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Facet-Level Relations to the Axis II Personality Disorders
A Structured Interview for the Assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Facet-Level Relations to the Axis II Personality Disorders Timothy J. Trull University of Missouri Columbia Thomas A.
More informationMasters Theses & Specialist Projects
Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School Spring 2017 An Examination of the Incremental Validity of the Serve-Specific Core Self-Evaluation Scale Over
More informationTest Partnership TPAQ Series Psychometric Properties
Test Partnership TPAQ Series Psychometric Properties 2018 1 Construct Validity The IPIP-NEO-120 (Johnson, 2014) is a validated measure of the Big-5 model of personality, specifically the OCEAN model (Costa
More informationThe relationship between personality and performance of football referees
The relationship between personality and performance of football referees Pirooz Sayfollahpour Student, Physical Education Department, Islamic Azad University, South Branch, Tehran,Iran Farideh Ashraf
More informationPersonality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school
Personality and Individual Differences 42 (2007) 441 451 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary
More informationChapter 9. Youth Counseling Impact Scale (YCIS)
Chapter 9 Youth Counseling Impact Scale (YCIS) Background Purpose The Youth Counseling Impact Scale (YCIS) is a measure of perceived effectiveness of a specific counseling session. In general, measures
More informationAlternative Methods for Assessing the Fit of Structural Equation Models in Developmental Research
Alternative Methods for Assessing the Fit of Structural Equation Models in Developmental Research Michael T. Willoughby, B.S. & Patrick J. Curran, Ph.D. Duke University Abstract Structural Equation Modeling
More informationImpact of Deprivation on Five Big Personality Dimensions among. College Students
The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 3, Issue 1, No.6, DIP: C00395V3I12015 http://www.ijip.in October December, 2015 Impact of Deprivation on Five
More informationStructural Validation of the 3 X 2 Achievement Goal Model
50 Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review (2012), Vol. 3, 50-59 2012 Philippine Educational Measurement and Evaluation Association Structural Validation of the 3 X 2 Achievement Goal Model Adonis
More informationSTRUCTURAL VALIDITY OF THE NEO PERSONALITY INVENTORY 3 (NEO-PI-3) IN A FRENCH-CANADIAN SAMPLE
International Journal of Arts & Sciences, CD-ROM. ISSN: 1944-6934 :: 09(03):461 472 (2016) STRUCTURAL VALIDITY OF THE NEO PERSONALITY INVENTORY 3 (NEO-PI-3) IN A FRENCH-CANADIAN SAMPLE Yann Le Corff and
More informationThe role of emotional intelligence and personality in moral reasoning
University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Sciences Book Chapters School of Sciences 2009 The role of emotional intelligence and personality in moral reasoning V Sagar Athota University of Notre
More informationThe Youth Experience Survey 2.0: Instrument Revisions and Validity Testing* David M. Hansen 1 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
The Youth Experience Survey 2.0: Instrument Revisions and Validity Testing* David M. Hansen 1 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Reed Larson 2 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign February 28,
More informationThe Study of Relationship between Neuroticism, Stressor and Stress Response
International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 7, No. 8; 2015 ISSN 1916-971X E-ISSN 1916-9728 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Study of Relationship between Neuroticism,
More informationAssessing Measurement Invariance in the Attitude to Marriage Scale across East Asian Societies. Xiaowen Zhu. Xi an Jiaotong University.
Running head: ASSESS MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE Assessing Measurement Invariance in the Attitude to Marriage Scale across East Asian Societies Xiaowen Zhu Xi an Jiaotong University Yanjie Bian Xi an Jiaotong
More informationSusceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-toexperience influences responses to anchoring cues
McElroy, T. & Dowd, K. (2007). Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(1): 48-53. (Feb 2007) Published by
More informationThe Myers Briggs Type Inventory
The Myers Briggs Type Inventory Charles C. Healy Professor of Education, UCLA In press with Kapes, J.T. et. al. (2001) A counselor s guide to Career Assessment Instruments. (4th Ed.) Alexandria, VA: National
More informationProcrastination, personality traits, and academic performance: When active and passive procrastination tell a different story.
Published in Personality and individual differences, 1 April 2017, vol. 108, pp. 154-157 which should be cited to refer to this work Procrastination, personality traits, and academic performance: When
More informationThe comparison of sensation seeking and five big factors of personality between internet dependents and non-dependents
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 (2011) 1029 1033 WCES-2011 The comparison of sensation seeking and five big factors of personality between internet
More informationUniversity of Warwick institutional repository:
University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please
More informationA META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND STUDENTS ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND STUDENTS ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Nur Safwati Ibrahim, Nur Syaliza Hanim Che Yusof, Nor Fatihah Abd Razak, Nur Dalila Norshahidi
More informationLumina Spark Development of an Integrated Assessment of Big 5. Personality Factors, Type Theory & Overextension
Lumina Spark Development of an Integrated Assessment of Big 5 Personality Factors, Type Theory & Overextension Stewart Desson, Stephen Benton 1, & John Golding 2 1 Business Psychology Centre, University
More informationVALIDATION OF TWO BODY IMAGE MEASURES FOR MEN AND WOMEN. Shayna A. Rusticus Anita M. Hubley University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
The University of British Columbia VALIDATION OF TWO BODY IMAGE MEASURES FOR MEN AND WOMEN Shayna A. Rusticus Anita M. Hubley University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Presented at the Annual
More informationValidity and Reliability of the Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale With Turkish Children
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247782343 Validity and Reliability of the Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction
More informationDEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE JAPANESE SCALE OF MINDFULNESS SKILLS BASED ON DBT STRATEGIES
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE JAPANESE SCALE OF MINDFULNESS SKILLS BASED ON DBT STRATEGIES Keiko Nakano Department of Clinical Psychology/Atomi University JAPAN ABSTRACT The present study reports findings
More informationTHE SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING CONSTRUCT: A TEST OF ITS CONVERGENT, DISCRIMINANT, AND FACTORIAL VALIDITY
Social Indicators Research (2005) 74: 445 476 Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s11205-004-8209-6 MARNE L. ARTHAUD-DAY, JOSEPH C. RODE, CHRISTINE H. MOONEY and JANET P. NEAR THE SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING CONSTRUCT:
More informationA Study of the Relationship of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, Self- Esteem and Personality Traits with Self-Efficacy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Received 05 Jun. 2014 Accepted 29 Oct. 2014 2014, Science-Line Publication www.science-line.com ISSN: 2322-4770 Journal of Educational and Management Studies J. Educ. Manage. Stud., 4(4):
More informationThe Difference Analysis between Demographic Variables and Personal Attributes The Case of Internal Auditors in Taiwan
The Difference Analysis between Demographic Variables and Personal Attributes The Case of Internal Auditors in Taiwan Li-Jia Chiu and Neng-Tang Norman Huang Department of Technology Application and Human
More informationHalesworth & District. Malcolm Ballantine
Halesworth & District Malcolm Ballantine Personality Assessment What is personality? Two Approaches Trait: Many independent descriptors Type: Single pithy descriptor Two Approaches - Examples Trait approach
More informationMethodology Introduction of the study Statement of Problem Objective Hypothesis Method
3.1. Introduction of the study 3.2. Statement of Problem 3.3. Objective 3.4. Hypothesis 3.5. Method 3.5.1. Procedure Sample A.5.2. Variable A.5.3. Research Design A.5.4. Operational Definition Of The Terms
More informationRunning head: CFA OF TDI AND STICSA 1. p Factor or Negative Emotionality? Joint CFA of Internalizing Symptomology
Running head: CFA OF TDI AND STICSA 1 p Factor or Negative Emotionality? Joint CFA of Internalizing Symptomology Caspi et al. (2014) reported that CFA results supported a general psychopathology factor,
More informationRelationship between personality traits and gender of Police officers in Punjab, Pakistan
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH Vol. IV, Issue 5/ August 2016 ISSN 2286-4822 www.euacademic.org Impact Factor: 3.4546 (UIF) DRJI Value: 5.9 (B+) Relationship between personality traits and gender of Police
More informationThe Psychometric Properties of Dispositional Flow Scale-2 in Internet Gaming
Curr Psychol (2009) 28:194 201 DOI 10.1007/s12144-009-9058-x The Psychometric Properties of Dispositional Flow Scale-2 in Internet Gaming C. K. John Wang & W. C. Liu & A. Khoo Published online: 27 May
More informationA very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains q
Journal of Research in Personality 37 (2003) 504 528 JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY www.elsevier.com/locate/jrp A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains q Samuel D. Gosling, * Peter
More informationThe Bilevel Structure of the Outcome Questionnaire 45
Psychological Assessment 2010 American Psychological Association 2010, Vol. 22, No. 2, 350 355 1040-3590/10/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0019187 The Bilevel Structure of the Outcome Questionnaire 45 Jamie L. Bludworth,
More informationGezinskenmerken: De constructie van de Vragenlijst Gezinskenmerken (VGK) Klijn, W.J.L.
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Gezinskenmerken: De constructie van de Vragenlijst Gezinskenmerken (VGK) Klijn, W.J.L. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Klijn, W. J. L. (2013).
More informationNEO-PI-R Factor Structure in College Students
17 Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, January 2009, Vol. 35, No.1, 17-25. Special Feature NEO-PI-R Factor Structure in College Students Kamlesh Singh Indian Institute of Technology, New
More informationTitle: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Texting While Driving Behavior in College Students MS # Manuscript ID GCPI
Title: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Texting While Driving Behavior in College Students MS # Manuscript ID GCPI-2015-02298 Appendix 1 Role of TPB in changing other behaviors TPB has been applied
More informationClient Personality and Preference for Counseling Approach: Does Match Matter?
CLIENT PERSONALITY AND PREFERENCE 33 Professional Issues in Counseling 2010, Volume 10, Article 4, p. 33-39 Client Personality and Preference for Counseling Approach: Does Match Matter? Client Personality
More informationCLINICAL VS. BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT
CLINICAL VS. BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT Informal Tes3ng Personality Tes3ng Assessment Procedures Ability Tes3ng The Clinical Interview 3 Defining Clinical Assessment The process of assessing the client through
More informationThe Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-Yet-Effective Measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality
Psychological Assessment Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association 2006, Vol. 18, No. 2, 192 203 1040-3590/06/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-Yet-Effective
More informationInternet Addiction and Personality Traits among Youths of Rajkot District
The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 Volume 2, Issue 2, Paper ID: B00333V2I22015 http://www.ijip.in January to March 2015 Internet Addiction and Personality Traits among Youths
More informationMichael Armey David M. Fresco. Jon Rottenberg. James J. Gross Ian H. Gotlib. Kent State University. Stanford University. University of South Florida
Further psychometric refinement of depressive rumination: Support for the Brooding and Pondering factor solution in a diverse community sample with clinician-assessed psychopathology Michael Armey David
More informationAnalysis of the Reliability and Validity of an Edgenuity Algebra I Quiz
Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of an Edgenuity Algebra I Quiz This study presents the steps Edgenuity uses to evaluate the reliability and validity of its quizzes, topic tests, and cumulative
More informationWho shall lead? An integrative personality approach to the study of the antecedents of status in informal social organizations
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Management Department Faculty Publications Management Department 6-2007 Who shall lead? An integrative personality approach
More informationPaul Irwing, Manchester Business School
Paul Irwing, Manchester Business School Factor analysis has been the prime statistical technique for the development of structural theories in social science, such as the hierarchical factor model of human
More informationThe validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the relational-interdependent self-construal scale
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2010) 579 584 WCPCG-2010 The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the relational-interdependent self-construal
More informationMEASURING STUDENT ATTACHMENT TO SCHOOL : A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH
MEASURING STUDENT ATTACHMENT TO SCHOOL : A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH Azlina Abu Bakar a a University Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia. a Corresponding author: azlina@umt.edu.my Ontario International
More informationA Short Form of Sweeney, Hausknecht and Soutar s Cognitive Dissonance Scale
A Short Form of Sweeney, Hausknecht and Soutar s Cognitive Dissonance Scale Associate Professor Jillian C. Sweeney University of Western Australia Business School, Crawley, Australia Email: jill.sweeney@uwa.edu.au
More informationNeurotic Styles and the Five Factor Model of Personality
Graduate Faculty Psychology Bulletin Volume 3, No. 1, 2005 Neurotic Styles and the Five Factor Model of Personality Brian Norensberg, M.A. 1 & Peter Zachar Ph.D. 2 Abstract ~ This study investigates the
More informationSelf-Efficacy in the Prediction of Academic Performance and Perceived Career Options
Journal of Counseling Psychology 1986, Vol. 33, No. 3, 265-269 Copyright 1986 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. F 0022-0167/86/0.75 Self-Efficacy in the Prediction of Academic Performance
More informationMultiple Act criterion:
Common Features of Trait Theories Generality and Stability of Traits: Trait theorists all use consistencies in an individual s behavior and explain why persons respond in different ways to the same stimulus
More informationA Cross-cultural Analysis of the Structure of Subjective Well-Being
1 A Cross-cultural Analysis of the Structure of Subjective Well-Being William A. Stock Morris A. Okun Arizona State University, USA and Juana Gomez Benito University of Barcelona, Spain In order for investigations
More informationYu-Fen Chen Chihlee Institute of Technology, Banciao, Taiwan, ROC Ming-Chuan Lai Chienkuo Technology University, Taiwan, ROC
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2010, 38(1), 1-12 Society for Personality Research (Inc.) DOI 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.1.1 FACTORS INFLUENCING THE Entrepreneurial Attitude OF TAIWANESE TERTIARY-LEVEL Business
More informationEffects of Cultural Adjustment on Academic Achievement of International Students
Journal of Elementary Education Vol.22, No. 2 pp. 95-103 Effects of Cultural Adjustment on Academic Achievement of International Students Maliha Nasir* Abstract This study was an attempt to find out how
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Vol 29, No: 2, 2014
RELATION OF CHARACTER STRENGTHS TO PERSONAL TEACHING EFFICACY IN KOREAN SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS Young-Jin Lim Mi-Na Kim Daegu University Many factors that may affect personal teaching efficacy (PTE)
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationRunning Head: PLANFULNESS 1
Running Head: PLANFULNESS 1 Planfulness: A Process-Focused Construct of Individual Differences in Goal Achievement. Rita M. Ludwig, Sanjay Srivastava, and Elliot T. Berkman University of Oregon Accepted
More informationEncyclopedia of Counseling Personality Theories, Traits
Encyclopedia of Counseling Personality Theories, Traits Contributors: William Fleeson Edited by: Frederick T. L. Leong Book Title: Encyclopedia of Counseling Chapter Title: "Personality Theories, Traits"
More information