Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis
|
|
- Silas Washington
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis Jin-Ling Tang a, *, Joseph LY Liu b a Department of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong b Centre for Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong Received 23 April 1999; received in revised form 24 August 1999; accepted 6 October 1999 Abstract Publication and other forms of selection biases pose a threat to the validity of meta-analysis. Funnel plots are usually used to detect such biases; asymmetrical plots are interpreted to suggest that biases are present. Using 198 published meta-analyses, we demonstrate that the shape of a funnel plot is largely determined by the arbitrary choice of the method to construct the plot. When a different definition of precision and/or effect measure were used, the conclusion about the shape of the plot was altered in 37 (86%) of the 43 meta-analyses with an asymmetrical plot suggesting selection bias. In the absence of a consensus on how the plot should be constructed, asymmetrical funnel plots should be interpreted cautiously. These findings also suggest that the discrepancies between large trials and corresponding meta-analyses and heterogeneity in meta-analyses may also be determined by how they are evaluated Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Funnel plot; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Selection bias; Publication bias; Statistical method; Systematic reviews 1. Introduction Meta-analysis is increasingly used to summarize healthrelated evidence as an aid to medical decision making. One of the main criticisms about the technique is that it is prone to publication and other forms of selection biases [1 5]. Meta-analyses should therefore be routinely scrutinized for the possible presence of such biases in practice [6]. The funnel plot (with the associated significance test for asymmetry of the plot) has been advocated by many for this purpose [1,6 8]. However, the procedure lacks empirical evidence to support what is observed is, indeed, selection bias. It was suggested that the method may result in false-positive results [9]. The validity of funnel plots needs to be scrutinized. A funnel plot is constructed by plotting the trial-specific effect against a measure of its precision. Precision may be defined differently according to the number of subjects in the trial or a function of the standard error for the effect, such as the inverse of the standard error and the statistical power [1,6,10,11]. A commonly held interpretation is that the points will be symmetrically distributed around the overall effect in the shape of an inverted funnel; when selection bias is present, the plot will become asymmetrical and the overall effect of the meta-analysis will be biased [1,6]. However, this reasoning is overly simplistic because other * Corresponding author. Tel: ; fax: address: jltang@cuhk.edu.hk (J.-L. Tang) factors may also affect the shape of the funnel plot. As is well recognized, the asymmetry of the funnel plot may be due to true heterogeneity. In other words, less precise trials may show a different effect from that of more precise trials because they differ in their design, participants characteristics, regimen of treatment, etc., and thus are not measuring the same underlying effect [7,12 15]. Furthermore, the funnel plot can be constructed in different ways. The treatment effect may be expressed as the relative risk or risk difference [16 18]. Precision may also be defined differently, as mentioned above [1,6,10,11]. Little is known about whether the choice of the definition of precision and effect measure in constructing the funnel plot may affect the shape of the plot. Using published meta-analyses, this article examines whether differently constructed funnel plots may result in discrepancies in conclusions about the symmetry of the plot and how often this discrepancy occurs. 2. Methods 2.1. Materials and general methods Meta-analyses were identified by search of every systematic review electronically published in the second issue of the 1998 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [19]. Meta-analyses having trial(s) using continuous variables as the outcome or trials having a proportion of outcome events of 0% or 100% in either of the two compared groups were /00/$ see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. PII: S (99) 转载
2 478 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Fig. 1. Funnel plots of the relative risk of three meta-analyses according to the definition of precision.
3 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Fig. 1. Continued. excluded. We also excluded meta-analyses with five or fewer trials. The arbitrary cutoff used here is based on the minimum number of six trials adopted in Egger et al s paper in which the funnel plot method and the associated significance test are described in more detail [6]. A total of 198 meta-analyses were included in this analysis. The precision is defined in two ways: one according to the inverse of the standard error and the other the trial size. We will call the funnel plot using the former definition of precision the standard error- or SE-based funnel plot and the latter the trial size- or N-based funnel plot. The measure of effect is expressed as both the relative risk and risk difference. Heterogeneity was tested by the method suggested by DerSimonian and Laird [20]. All the analyses were conducted using the Statistical Analysis System (version 6.11) Standard error-based funnel plot and related asymmetry test The SE-based funnel plot is constructed by plotting the effect measure (e.g., the natural logarithm of the relative risk) against the inverse of its standard error. Its asymmetry is tested by a significance test using the linear regression method suggested by Egger and colleagues [6]. Briefly, in the regression the standardized effect (STE), defined as the effect divided by its standard error, is regressed against the precision of the effect, defined as the inverse of the standard error (regression equation: STE precision). The intercept provides a quantitative measure of the asymmetry and is of major interest. The more the intercept deviates from zero, the more pronounced the asymmetry. Negative values will indicate that less precise studies have a more pronounced effect than more precise studies and may thus suggest selection bias. If the P-value of the intercept is 0.10 or smaller, the asymmetry is considered to be statistically significant and accepted Study size-based funnel plot and related asymmetry test In the N-based funnel plot the effect is plotted against the number of subjects or study size. Using the same principles as in the SE-based regression [6,21,22], we suggest here an N-based linear regression in which the product (E) of the effect and the square root of the average number of subjects in the two compared groups of the trial (n) is regressed against the latter (regression equation: E n). The interpretation of the intercept and its P-value is the same as that of the SE-based regression outlined above Comparison of differently constructed funnel plots Five meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database [23 27] are used to demonstrate how the funnel plot of the same set of studies may differ from each other when different definitions of precision and/or effect measures are used. In order to show how often the funnel plots may differ from each other, we divided the 198 meta-analyses into the following three
4 480 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Fig. 2. SE-based or N-based funnel plots of three meta-analyses according to the measure of effect.
5 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Fig. 2. Continued. groups: 1) consistently symmetrical: the funnel plot is symmetrical regardless of the definition of precision and effect measure used, 2) consistently asymmetrical: the funnel plot is asymmetrical regardless of the definition of precision and effect measure used, and 3) inconsistently asymmetrical: the funnel plot is asymmetrical when only some, but not all, combinations of the two definitions of precision and two effect measures are used. Group 3 meta-analyses may have a symmetrical or asymmetrical funnel plot depending on how the plot is constructed and are considered to have discrepant funnel plots. Meta-analyses of groups 2 and 3 are further divided into two groups according to the sign of intercept: 1) the intercept is negative in at least one of the asymmetrical funnel plots differently constructed and 2) the intercept is positive in all the asymmetrical funnel plots. The former could suggest selection bias while the latter would not. 3. Results 3.1. Comparison of funnel plots constructed with the same effect measure Fig. 1 shows that the funnel plot for the relative risk may differ from each other when different definitions of precision are used in constructing the plot. In meta-analysis A [23] the SE-based funnel plot (Fig. 1, A1) is largely symmetrical and the P-value for the significance test of the asymmetry (i.e., the regression intercept) is 0.32, suggesting that the effect is not associated with precision and small trials have a relative risk similar to that of the large trials. Conversely, the N-based plot (Fig. 1, A2) is asymmetrical (P 0.09 for the regression intercept, and the same for the P-values below) and shows that small trials have a much smaller effect than that of the large trials. Meta-analysis B [24] shows the opposite. The SE-based plot (Fig. 1, B1) and test for the intercept (P 0.10) suggest that small trials produce more pronounced effects than the large trials, while the N-based plot (Fig. 1, B2) and test (P 0.24) suggest a lack of strong evidence for such an association and that the overall effect of small trials is close to that of the large ones. In meta-analysis C [25] both the SE-based and N-based plots look asymmetrical but in opposite directions. The SEbased plot (Fig. 1, C1) indicates that small trials produce more pronounced effect than large ones (P 0.09), while the N-based plot (Fig. 1, C2) seems to indicate the opposite, although the test for asymmetry was not statistically significant (P 0.17).
6 482 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Comparison of funnel plots constructed with the same definition of precision Fig. 2 shows that funnel plots based on the same definition of large trials may differ from each other when different effect measures are used. The SE-based funnel plot of meta-analysis D [24] is asymmetrical for both the risk difference (Fig. 2, D1, P 0.03) and relative risk (Fig. 2, D2, P 0.10) but in opposite directions. The N-based funnel plot of meta-analysis E [26] is symmetrical for the risk difference (Fig. 2, E1, P 0.91) but asymmetrical for the relative risk (Fig. 2, E2, P 0.02). In all five examples above, there is obvious heterogeneity in either the risk difference or the relative risk or both (P 0.10). However, funnel plots may still differ in meta-analyses in which there is insufficient evidence for the presence of heterogeneity. In meta-analysis F [27], for example, heterogeneity is neither observed for the risk difference (P 0.78) nor for the relative risk (P 0.88). The SE-based funnel plot is symmetrical for the risk difference (Fig. 2, F1, P 0.90) but asymmetrical for the relative risk (Fig. 2, F2, P 0.06) Frequency of meta-analyses having discrepant funnel plots Table 1 shows how often the funnel plot differs when different definitions of precision and/or effect measures are used. Of the 198 meta-analyses, 122 (61.6%) consistently showed a symmetrical funnel plot (group 1). 8 (4.0%) an asymmetrical plot regardless of how the plot was constructed (groups 2 and 3), and 68 (34.3%) had discrepant funnel plots when a different definition of precision and/or effect measure were used (groups 4 and 5). The asymmetry of funnel plots is dependent on how the plot is constructed in 37 (86.0%, 95% confidence interval: 76% 96%) (group 4) of the 43 meta-analyses with an asymmetrical funnel plot, which suggests selection bias (groups 2 and 4). The number is 31 (93.5%, 95% confidence interval: 86% 100%) (group 5) of the 33 meta-analyses with an asymmetrical plot, which is unlikely to be a result of selection bias (groups 3 and 5). Table 1 Disagreements in the direction of and significance test for the asymmetry of differently constructed funnel plots of 198 meta-analyses Categories Number % 1) Consistently symmetrical ) Consistently asymmetrical with at least one negative intercept ) Consistently asymmetrical with intercepts all positive ) Inconsistently asymmetrical with at least one negative intercept 37 a ) Inconsistently asymmetrical with intercepts all positive Total a The further breakdown of this group of meta-analyses according to the definition of precision and effect measure are tabulated in Table 2. The proportion of discrepant meta-analyses suggestive of selection bias is 18.5% (12/65) in meta-analyses with 6 trials, 21.4% (18/84) in those with 7 9 trials, and 26.5% (13/49) in those with 10 trials or more. In these discrepant meta-analyses, the proportion of those that are method-dependent is 100%, 88.9%, and 69.2% respectively, for the three groups of metaanalyses with different number of trials (data are not tabulated). In addition, in 95 meta-analyses in which there is no sufficient evidence for heterogeneity (P 0.10) in either the risk difference or the relative risk, 23 (24.2%) show an asymmetrical funnel plot (i.e., equivalent to groups 2 and 4 meta-analyses in Table 1), suggesting selection bias, and in 19 (82.6%) of them the asymmetry is method dependent (data are not tabulated). 4. Discussion We found that the shape of the funnel plot depends to a large degree on how the precision is defined and what effect measure is used in constructing the plot. The funnel plot is asymmetrical and suggests selection bias in 43 (21.7%) of the 198 meta-analyses examined in this study. However, the plot became symmetrical in 86.0% of the 43 meta-analyses when a different definition of precision and/or effect measure were used. This proportion was slightly smaller in meta-analyses with no sufficient evidence for heterogeneity and in those with a relatively large number of trials. In the absence of a consensus on which definitions of precision and effect measures are the preferred methods, this large number of inconsistently asymmetrical funnel plots should be interpreted cautiously. Selection bias is possibly a reasonable explanation in the 6 of the 43 meta-analyses that consistently showed an asymmetrical funnel plot suggestive of selection bias. However, explanations other than selection bias may also need to be sought in the rest of the 43 meta-analyses. First, whether selection bias is present or not should not depend on how the funnel plot is constructed. Second, there were also 33 asymmetrical metaanalyses that have a positive intercept and don t suggest selection bias. This may imply that a similar number of meta-analyses having a negative intercept suggestive of selection bias may also arise due to reasons other than selection bias. One explanation suggested is true heterogeneity or more precisely an association of the effect with the precision of the trials [7,12 15]. True heterogeneity, again, does not explain why most of the asymmetrical funnel plots are method dependent. The reasons for such dependence have yet to be found. We believe that the dependence can partly be explained by the variation in the frequency of the outcome events (or simply the risk) in the compared groups of the trials. An examination of how the standard error is determined may explain this claim. The standard error is a function of the sample size and risk. Precision as defined by the inverse of standard error is thus a function of the sample size and risk, while precision as defined by the trial size depends by definition on sample size only. When the risk varies in compared groups among the trials, the precision of the same trials will
7 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) Table 2 Thirty-seven meta-analyses with discrepant funnel plots some of which suggest selection bias, according to the definition of precision and effect measure Categories a Number % 1) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Total a : the 1st place, risk difference (RD) as effect measure and study size as precision; The 2nd place, relative risk (RR) as effect measure and study size as precision; The 3rd place, RD as effect measure and the inverse of standard error as precision; The 4th place, RR as effect measure and the inverse of standard error as precision; and, asymmetrical funnel plot;, symmetrical funnel plot. be rated differently by the two definitions of precision. As a result, the two funnel plots may differ. Meta-analyses in Fig. 1 provide cases in point when the precision is defined differently. In addition, the standard error is a different function of sample size and risk for the risk difference and the logarithm of the relative risk [16,18,28]. Once again, when the risk varies in the trials, the precision of the same trials will be rated differently when different effect measures are used, resulting in discrepant SE-based funnel plots (Fig. 2, D and F). Furthermore, an asymmetrical funnel plot indicates that the treatment effect varies according to a third factor: the precision. This phenomenon is known as effect modification (or interaction) in epidemiology and the precision is the effect modifier [29]. The presence of effect modification largely depends on the choice of the effect measure when the risk in the control group differs [13,30,31]. Typically, no effect modification when the risk difference is used as the effect measure may indicate an effect modification when the relative risk is used, and vice versa [31]. Thus, the shape of funnel plots using different effect measures may differ in a manner similar to the dependence of effect modification on the effect measure used, even when trial size is used as precision (Fig. 2, E and Table 2). To illustrate, assume that trials in a meta-analysis have the same number of patients equally divided in the two compared groups, and the risk in the treated group is 4% lower than that in the control group, which varies between 5% and 20% in the trials. The risk difference will be constant in the trials, but the relative risk varies; those with a larger relative risk will be rated as less precise than those with a smaller relative risk. Consequently, the SE-based funnel plot for the relative risk will be asymmetrical, indicating that less precise trials have a greater relative risk a feature of publication bias but not a result of selective publication, whereas the SE-based funnel plot for the risk difference and the N-based plots will not suggest publication bias. These discussions also indicate that the N-based funnel plots in which the precision is not affected by the risk may be the preferable method for detection of bias. However, in practice the trial size may not be independent of, but often determined by, the level of the risk studied [13,14]. Hence, like the SE-based funnel plots, the N-based funnel plots may cause false-positive results. Furthermore, if publication bias exists, the selection procedure is likely to be determined by a function of the magnitude of the effect and its standard error (as reflected by the associated confidence interval or P-value), rather than directly by study size [3]. In this case the N-based funnel plot may fail to detect the presence of the bias. How often would the shape of funnel plots depend on the way the plot is constructed? The answer is whenever an asymmetrical funnel plot occurs. The variation in effect due to either true heterogeneity or chance is the prerequisite for the occurrence of an asymmetrical plot. Whenever the effect varies, the risk varies either in the control or treated group or in both. Thus, the risk variation, which is an inevitable consequence of effect variation, will always play a role, if not the only role, in the occurrence of an asymmetrical plot. In other words, all asymmetrical funnel plots are dependent more or less on the way they are constructed. These findings raise a question about the validity of the funnel plot as a tool for the detection of selection-related biases in meta-analyses of binary outcomes because of its inability of distinguishing selection bias from true heterogeneity. Recognition of the dependence of the shape of the funnel plot on the definition of precision and/or effect measure used has several implications. First, it is overly simplistic to conclude that a meta-analysis is biased on an observation of an asymmetrical funnel plot. Second, most observed discrepancies between large trials and corresponding meta-analyses [32 34] may be dependent on how large trials are defined and what effect measures are used in the comparison. Third, the presence of heterogeneity in a meta-analysis may also depend on the choice of effect measure used [28]. Fourth, the effect measure that has a symmetrical funnel plot should probably be used to summarize the trials if it is also clinically desirable. Alternatively, an asymmetrical funnel plot should be interpreted as suggestive of a special form of heterogeneity in which the effect is associated with the precision (i.e., the risk, trial size or both) of the trials. This association can be simply called the precision-related heterogeneity. The determinants of the association, one of which is selection bias, should be further investigated and such information would be of great value for clinical decision making [35 39]. Acknowledgments We thank Shelly LY Tse and Lan Kwok for assistance in hand searching the Cochrane Database and Aprille Sham in
8 484 J.-L. Tang, J.L.Y. Liu / Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) statistical graphics. This project was supported in part by a grant from the Chinese University of Hong Kong ( ). References [1] Light R, Pillemer DB. Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, [2] Koren G, Graham K, Shear H, Einarson T. Bias against the null hypothesis: the reproductive hazards of cocaine. Lancet 1989;II: [3] Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337: [4] Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992;267: [5] Egger M, Davey Smith G. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 1998;316:61 6. [6] Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a single, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315: [7] Berlin JA, Begg CB, Louis TA. An assessment of publication bias using a sample of published clinical trials. J Am Stat Assoc 1989;84: [8] Elvik R. Evaluating the statistical conclusion validity of weighted mean results in meta-analysis by analysing funnel graph diagrams. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30: [9] Irwig L, Macaskill P, Berry G, Glasziou P. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test: graphical test is itself biased. BMJ 1998;316:740. [10] Vandenbroucke JP. Passive smoking and lung cancer: a publication bias. BMJ 1988;296: [11] Ioannidis JPA, Cappelleri JC, Lau J. Issues in comparison between meta-analyses and large trials. JAMA 1998;279: [12] Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity. BMJ 1998;316:469. [13] Schmid CH, Lau J, McIntosh M, Cappelleri JC. An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials. Stat Med 1998;17: [14] Gonser M, Vetter K, Noack F. Meta-analyses of interventional trials done in populations with different risks. Lancet 1995;345:1304. [15] Ioannidis JPA, Cappelleri JC, Lau J. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1998;338:59. [16] Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp [17] Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996: [18] Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Measures of effect and measures of association. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, editors. Modern Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, pp [19] Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews. Oxford: Update Software, Disk issue 2. [20] DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7: [21] Galbraith RF. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med 1988;7: [22] Galbraith RF. Graphical display of estimates having differing standard errors. Technometrics 1988;30: [23] Thornley B, Adams CE, Awad G. Chlorpromazine versus placebo for those with schizophrenia. (Comparison: Chlorpromazine vs placebo; Outcome: behaviour deteriorated / disturbed / unco-operative.) Cochrane Library: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Oxford: Update Software, Disk issue 2. [24] Jewell D, Young G. Treatments for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. (Comparison: all antiemetic medication compared with placebo; Outcome: effect on nausea.) Cochrane Library: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Oxford: Update Software, Disk issue 2. [25] Handoll HHG, Farrar MJ, McBirnie J, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Awal KA, Milne AA, Gillespie WJ. Prophylaxis using heparin, low molecular weight heparin and physical methods against deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in hip fracture surgery. (Comparison: any heparin vs control / placebo; Outcome: DVT any.) Cochrane Library: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Oxford: Update Software, Disk issue 2. [26] Silagy C, Ketteridge S. Physician advice for smoking cessation. (Comparison: effects aids adjuncts to advice; Outcome: smoking cessation (maximal followup).) Cochrane Library: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Oxford: Update Software, Disk issue 2. [27] Boulvain M, Irion O. Stripping/sweeping of the membranes to induce labour or to prevent post-term pregnancy. (Comparison: stripping/ sweeping of the membranes vs controls; Outcome: forceps/vacuum extraction.) Cochrane Library: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Oxford: Update Software, Disk issue 2. [28] Tang JL. Weighting bias in meta-analysis of binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (in press). [29] Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Concepts of Interaction. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Eds. Modern Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998: [30] Rothman K, Poole C. A strengthening programme for weak associations. Int J Epidemiol 1968;17(4)(suppl.): [31] Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology, 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown & Company, pp , [32] Villar J, Carroli G, Belizán JM. Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1995;345: [33] Cappelleri JC, Ioannidis JPA, Schmid CH, de Ferranti SD, Aubert M, Chalmers TC, Lau J. Large trials and meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare? JAMA 1996;276: [34] LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997;337: [35] Davey-Smith G, Song F, Sheldon TA. Cholesterol lowering and mortality: the importance of considering initial level of risk. BMJ 1993; 306: [36] Davey-Smith G, Egger M. Who benefits from medical interventions? BMJ 1994;308:72 4. [37] Berlin JA. Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in metaanalysis of data from epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: [38] Sharp SJ, Thompson SG, Altman G. The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis. BMJ 1996;313: [39] Thompson SG, Smith TC, Sharp SJ. Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 1997;16:
Choice of axis, tests for funnel plot asymmetry, and methods to adjust for publication bias
Technical appendix Choice of axis, tests for funnel plot asymmetry, and methods to adjust for publication bias Choice of axis in funnel plots Funnel plots were first used in educational research and psychology,
More informationPapers. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses Fujian Song, Douglas G Altman, Anne-Marie Glenny, Jonathan J Deeks Abstract
More informationPerformance of the Trim and Fill Method in Adjusting for the Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis of Continuous Data
American Journal of Applied Sciences 9 (9): 1512-1517, 2012 ISSN 1546-9239 2012 Science Publication Performance of the Trim and Fill Method in Adjusting for the Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis of Continuous
More informationFixed Effect Combining
Meta-Analysis Workshop (part 2) Michael LaValley December 12 th 2014 Villanova University Fixed Effect Combining Each study i provides an effect size estimate d i of the population value For the inverse
More information18/11/2013. An Introduction to Meta-analysis. In this session: What is meta-analysis? Some Background Clinical Trials. What questions are addressed?
In this session: What is meta-analysis? An Introduction to Meta-analysis Geoff Der Unit Statistician MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow When is it appropriate to use?
More informationEvaluating the results of a Systematic Review/Meta- Analysis
Open Access Publication Evaluating the results of a Systematic Review/Meta- Analysis by Michael Turlik, DPM 1 The Foot and Ankle Online Journal 2 (7): 5 This is the second of two articles discussing the
More informationWhat is meta-analysis?
...? series Supported by sanofi-aventis Second edition Evidence-based medicine What is Iain K Crombie PhD FFPHM Professor of Public Health, University of Dundee Huw TO Davies PhD Professor of Health Care
More informationWhat is indirect comparison?
...? series New title Statistics Supported by sanofi-aventis What is indirect comparison? Fujian Song BMed MMed PhD Reader in Research Synthesis, Faculty of Health, University of East Anglia Indirect comparison
More informationSumming up evidence: one answer is not always enough
Meta-analysis Duet Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough Joseph Lau, John PA Ioannidis, Christopher H Schmid Are meta-analyses the brave new world, or are the critics of such combined analyses
More informationAssessing publication bias in genetic association studies: evidence from a recent meta-analysis
Psychiatry Research 129 (2004) 39 44 www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres Assessing publication bias in genetic association studies: evidence from a recent meta-analysis Marcus R. Munafò a, *, Taane G. Clark
More informationRevised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) Additional considerations for cross-over trials
Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) Additional considerations for cross-over trials Edited by Julian PT Higgins on behalf of the RoB 2.0 working group on cross-over trials
More informationIntroduction to diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Yemisi Takwoingi October 2015
Introduction to diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis Yemisi Takwoingi October 2015 Learning objectives To appreciate the concept underlying DTA meta-analytic approaches To know the Moses-Littenberg SROC method
More informationEvidence-Based Medicine and Publication Bias Desmond Thompson Merck & Co.
Evidence-Based Medicine and Publication Bias Desmond Thompson Merck & Co. Meta-Analysis Defined A meta-analysis is: the statistical combination of two or more separate studies In other words: overview,
More informationAquantitative systematic review, or meta-analysis, Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews
Systematic Review Series Series Editors: Cynthia Mulrow, MD # MSc Deborah Cook, MD, MSc Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews Joseph Lau, MD; John P.A. Ioannidis, MD; and Christopher H. Schmid,
More informationDisclosures. An Introduction to Meta Analysis. Biography, SL Norris 2/20/2012
An Introduction to Meta Analysis Susan L. Norris, MD, MPH, MS Associate Professor Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR norriss@ohsu.edu Biography, SL Norris MD, MS, University of Alberta MPH,
More informationComparison of Different Methods of Detecting Publication Bias
Shaping the Future of Drug Development Comparison of Different Methods of Detecting Publication Bias PhUSE 2017, Edinburgh Janhavi Kale, Cytel Anwaya Nirpharake, Cytel Outline Systematic review and Meta-analysis
More informationClinical research in AKI Timing of initiation of dialysis in AKI
Clinical research in AKI Timing of initiation of dialysis in AKI Josée Bouchard, MD Krescent Workshop December 10 th, 2011 1 Acute kidney injury in ICU 15 25% of critically ill patients experience AKI
More informationFalse statistically significant findings in cumulative metaanalyses and the ability of Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to identify them.
False statistically significant findings in cumulative metaanalyses and the ability of Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to identify them. Protocol Georgina Imberger 1 Kristian Thorlund 2,1 Christian Gluud
More informationHow to Conduct a Meta-Analysis
How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis Faculty Development and Diversity Seminar ludovic@bu.edu Dec 11th, 2017 Periodontal disease treatment and preterm birth We conducted a metaanalysis of randomized controlled
More informationResults. NeuRA Herbal medicines August 2016
Introduction have been suggested as a potential alternative treatment which may positively contribute to the treatment of schizophrenia. Herbal therapies can include traditional Chinese medicines and Indian
More informationSystematic Reviews. Simon Gates 8 March 2007
Systematic Reviews Simon Gates 8 March 2007 Contents Reviewing of research Why we need reviews Traditional narrative reviews Systematic reviews Components of systematic reviews Conclusions Key reference
More informationIntroduction to systematic reviews/metaanalysis
Introduction to systematic reviews/metaanalysis Hania Szajewska The Medical University of Warsaw Department of Paediatrics hania@ipgate.pl Do I needknowledgeon systematicreviews? Bastian H, Glasziou P,
More informationWhat is meta-analysis? Published by Hayward Medical Communications
Volume 1, number 8 What is Published by Hayward Medical Communications and Huw T O Davies PhD HonMFPHM Lecturer in Health Care Management, University of St Andrews Iain K Crombie PhD HonMFPHM Reader in
More informationSupplementary Online Content
Supplementary Online Content Tsai WC, Wu HY, Peng YS, et al. Association of intensive blood pressure control and kidney disease progression in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic
More informationA Simple Method For Detecting And Adjusting Meta- Analyses For Publication Bias
ISPUB.COM The Internet Journal of Epidemiology Volume 3 Number 2 A Simple Method For Detecting And Adjusting Meta- Analyses For Publication Bias F Richy, J Reginster Citation F Richy, J Reginster. A Simple
More informationResults. NeuRA Treatments for internalised stigma December 2017
Introduction Internalised stigma occurs within an individual, such that a person s attitude may reinforce a negative self-perception of mental disorders, resulting in reduced sense of selfworth, anticipation
More informationTraumatic brain injury
Introduction It is well established that traumatic brain injury increases the risk for a wide range of neuropsychiatric disturbances, however there is little consensus on whether it is a risk factor for
More informationClinical Trials. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. John PA Ioannidis and Thomas A Trikalinos
Clinical Trials http://ctj.sagepub.com/ An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings John PA Ioannidis and Thomas A Trikalinos Clin Trials 2007 4: 245 DOI: 10.1177/1740774507079441 The online
More informationResearch Synthesis and meta-analysis: themes. Graham A. Colditz, MD, DrPH Method Tuuli, MD, MPH
Research Synthesis and meta-analysis: themes Graham A. Colditz, MD, DrPH Method Tuuli, MD, MPH Today Course format Goals, competencies Overview of themes for the class SRMA M19-551 Course Format Lectures»
More informationFurther data analysis topics
Further data analysis topics Jonathan Cook Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford EQUATOR OUCAGS training course 24th October 2015 Outline Ideal study Further topics Multiplicity
More informationApplying Evidence-Based Practice with Meta-Analysis
Applying Evidence-Based Practice with Meta-Analysis Mike W.-L. Cheung, PhD 1 1 March 2018 1 Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore (NUS) 1 A little bit background about me (1) PhD:
More informationMeta-Analysis. Zifei Liu. Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Meta-Analysis Zifei Liu What is a meta-analysis; why perform a metaanalysis? How a meta-analysis work some basic concepts and principles Steps of Meta-analysis Cautions on meta-analysis 2 What is Meta-analysis
More informationExplaining heterogeneity
Explaining heterogeneity Julian Higgins School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK Outline 1. Revision and remarks on fixed-effect and random-effects metaanalysis methods (and interpretation
More informationRecursive Cumulative Meta-analysis: A Diagnostic for the Evolution of Total Randomized Evidence from Group and Individual Patient Data
J Clin Epidemiol Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 281 291, 1999 Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. 0895-4356/99/$ see front matter PII S0895-4356(98)00159-0 Recursive Cumulative Meta-analysis:
More informationPlacebo-controlled trials of Chinese herbal medicine and conventional medicine comparative study
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association ß The Author 2007; all rights reserved. Advance Access publication 30 June 2007 International Journal of
More informationREPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
FERTILITY AND STERILITY VOL. 74, NO. 2, AUGUST 2000 Copyright 2000 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Published by Elsevier Science Inc. Printed on acid-free paper in U.S.A. REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
More informationNeuRA Sleep disturbance April 2016
Introduction People with schizophrenia may show disturbances in the amount, or the quality of sleep they generally receive. Typically sleep follows a characteristic pattern of four stages, where stage
More informationAnimal-assisted therapy
Introduction Animal-assisted interventions use trained animals to help improve physical, mental and social functions in people with schizophrenia. It is a goal-directed intervention in which an animal
More informationBeyond RevMan: Meta-Regression. Analysis in Context
Beyond RevMan: Meta-Regression Analysis in Context Robin Christensen, MSc, Biostatistician The Parker Institute: Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit Frederiksberg Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark Statistical Editor
More informationHeterogeneity and statistical signi"cance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses -
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE Statist. Med. 2000; 19: 1707}1728 Heterogeneity and statistical signi"cance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses - Eric A. Engels *, Christopher H. Schmid, Norma
More informationModels for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors
Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors Nicky Welton Thanks to: Tony Ades, John Carlin, Doug Altman, Jonathan Sterne, Ross Harris RSS Avon Local Group Meeting,
More informationHow to do a meta-analysis. Orestis Efthimiou Dpt. Of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine University of Ioannina, Greece
How to do a meta-analysis Orestis Efthimiou Dpt. Of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine University of Ioannina, Greece 1 Overview (A brief reminder of ) What is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
More informationProblem solving therapy
Introduction People with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia may show impairments in problem-solving ability. Remediation interventions such as problem solving skills training can help people
More informationResults. NeuRA Treatments for dual diagnosis August 2016
Introduction Many treatments have been targeted to improving symptom severity for people suffering schizophrenia in combination with substance use problems. Studies of dual diagnosis often investigate
More informationDeterminants of quality: Factors that lower or increase the quality of evidence
Determinants of quality: Factors that lower or increase the quality of evidence GRADE Workshop CBO, NHG and Dutch Cochrane Centre CBO, April 17th, 2013 Outline The GRADE approach: step by step Factors
More informationCapture-recapture method for assessing publication bias
Received: 30.9.2009 Accepted: 19.1.2010 Original Article Capture-recapture method for assessing publication bias Jalal Poorolajal* a, Ali Akbar Haghdoost b, Mahmood Mahmoodi a, Reza Majdzadeh a, Siavosh
More informationLive WebEx meeting agenda
10:00am 10:30am Using OpenMeta[Analyst] to extract quantitative data from published literature Live WebEx meeting agenda August 25, 10:00am-12:00pm ET 10:30am 11:20am Lecture (this will be recorded) 11:20am
More informationIntroduction to Meta-Analysis
Introduction to Meta-Analysis Nazım Ço galtay and Engin Karada g Abstract As a means to synthesize the results of multiple studies, the chronological development of the meta-analysis method was in parallel
More informationW e have previously described the disease impact
606 THEORY AND METHODS Impact numbers: measures of risk factor impact on the whole population from case-control and cohort studies R F Heller, A J Dobson, J Attia, J Page... See end of article for authors
More informationConfidence Intervals On Subsets May Be Misleading
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Volume 3 Issue 2 Article 2 11-1-2004 Confidence Intervals On Subsets May Be Misleading Juliet Popper Shaffer University of California, Berkeley, shaffer@stat.berkeley.edu
More informationMeta Analysis. David R Urbach MD MSc Outcomes Research Course December 4, 2014
Meta Analysis David R Urbach MD MSc Outcomes Research Course December 4, 2014 Overview Definitions Identifying studies Appraising studies Quantitative synthesis Presentation of results Examining heterogeneity
More informationComparison of Meta-Analytic Results of Indirect, Direct, and Combined Comparisons of Drugs for Chronic Insomnia in Adults: A Case Study
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison of Meta-Analytic Results of Indirect, Direct, and Combined Comparisons of Drugs for Chronic Insomnia in Adults: A Case Study Ben W. Vandermeer, BSc, MSc, Nina Buscemi, PhD,
More informationLack of association between IL-6-174G>C polymorphism and lung cancer: a metaanalysis
Lack of association between IL-6-174G>C polymorphism and lung cancer: a metaanalysis Y. Liu, X.L. Song, G.L. Zhang, A.M. Peng, P.F. Fu, P. Li, M. Tan, X. Li, M. Li and C.H. Wang Department of Respiratory
More informationEarly extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58 (2005) 543 549 REVIEW ARTICLES Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized
More informationSupplementary Online Content
Supplementary Online Content Wu HY, Peng YS, Chiang CK, et al. Diagnostic performance of random urine samples using albumin concentration vs ratio of albumin to creatinine for microalbuminuria screening
More informationAssociations between the SRD5A2 gene V89L and TA repeat polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis
Associations between the SRD5A2 gene V89L and TA repeat polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis D. Zhang 1, Q. Li 2, H.-C. Qu 3, T. Yu 2 and Y.-R. Liu 1 1 College of Basic Medical Science,
More informationMeta-analysis: Advanced methods using the STATA software
Page 1 sur 5 Wednesday 20 September 2017 - Introduction to meta-analysis Introduction I. Why do a meta-analysis? II. How does a meta-analysis work? Some concepts III. Definition of an «effect size» 1.
More informationResults. NeuRA Hypnosis June 2016
Introduction may be experienced as an altered state of consciousness or as a state of relaxation. There is no agreed framework for administering hypnosis, but the procedure often involves induction (such
More informationUnit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data
Unit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data Area Principle Bar Chart Boxplot Conditional Distribution Dotplot Empirical Rule Five Number Summary Frequency Distribution Frequency Polygon Histogram Interquartile
More informationDistraction techniques
Introduction are a form of coping skills enhancement, taught during cognitive behavioural therapy. These techniques are used to distract and draw attention away from the auditory symptoms of schizophrenia,
More informationCochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Methodological Guidelines
Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Methodological Guidelines [Prepared by Simon Gates: July 2009, updated July 2012] These guidelines are intended to aid quality and consistency across the reviews
More informationObserved Differences in Diagnostic Test Accuracy between Patient Subgroups: Is It Real or Due to Reference Standard Misclassification?
Clinical Chemistry 53:10 1725 1729 (2007) Overview Observed Differences in Diagnostic Test Accuracy between Patient Subgroups: Is It Real or Due to Reference Standard Misclassification? Corné Biesheuvel,
More informationRANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS, OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES, AND THE HIERARCHY OF RESEARCH DESIGNS
RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS, OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES, AND THE HIERARCHY OF RESEARCH DESIGNS RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS, OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES, AND THE HIERARCHY OF RESEARCH DESIGNS JOHN CONCATO, M.D.,
More informationMeta-analysis: Methodology
Meta-analysis: Methodology Example: Assessment of cardiovascular safety profile of new generation BCR-ABL TKIs in patients with CML Haguet Hélène 04/03/2016 Meta-analysis = statistical combination of results
More informationIndex. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 T.J. Cleophas, A.H. Zwinderman, Modern Meta-Analysis, DOI /
Index A Adjusted Heterogeneity without Overdispersion, 63 Agenda-driven bias, 40 Agenda-Driven Meta-Analyses, 306 307 Alternative Methods for diagnostic meta-analyses, 133 Antihypertensive effect of potassium,
More informationGUIDELINE COMPARATORS & COMPARISONS:
GUIDELINE COMPARATORS & COMPARISONS: Direct and indirect comparisons Adapted version (2015) based on COMPARATORS & COMPARISONS: Direct and indirect comparisons - February 2013 The primary objective of
More informationPrinciples of meta-analysis
Principles of meta-analysis 1 The popularity of meta-analyses Search on 22 October 2015 10000 9000 8156 8875 8000 7000 6554 6000 5000 4852 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1 1 1 272 334 371 323 386 429 482 596 639
More informationUNCORRECTED PROOFS. Software for Publication Bias. Michael Borenstein Biostat, Inc., USA CHAPTER 11
CHAPTER Software for Publication Bias Michael Borenstein Biostat, Inc., USA KEY POINTS Various procedures for addressing publication bias are discussed elsewhere in this volume. The goal of this chapter
More informationThe role of meta-analysis in the evaluation of the effects of early nutrition on neurodevelopment
Note: for non-commercial purposes only The role of meta-analysis in the evaluation of the effects of early nutrition on neurodevelopment Hania Szajewska The Medical University of Warsaw Department of Paediatrics
More informationTreatment effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis
Treatment effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis Gerta Rücker 1, James Carpenter 12, Guido Schwarzer 1 1 Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University
More informationCorresponding author: F.Q. Wen
Association of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 33 (ADAM33) gene polymorphisms with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis D.D. Li 1,2, S.J. Guo 1,2, L.Q. Jia
More informationFlexible Matching in Case-Control Studies of Gene-Environment Interactions
American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved Vol. 59, No. Printed in U.S.A. DOI: 0.093/aje/kwg250 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Flexible
More informationWorkshop: Cochrane Rehabilitation 05th May Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health.
Workshop: Cochrane Rehabilitation 05th May 2018 Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Disclosure I have no conflicts of interest with anything in this presentation How to read a systematic
More informationMethod. NeuRA Biofeedback May 2016
Introduction is a technique in which information about the person s body is fed back to the person so that they may be trained to alter the body s conditions. Physical therapists use biofeedback to help
More informationContour enhanced funnel plots for meta-analysis
Contour enhanced funnel plots for meta-analysis Tom Palmer 1, Jaime Peters 2, Alex Sutton 3, Santiago Moreno 3 1. MRC Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine,
More informationResults. NeuRA Mindfulness and acceptance therapies August 2018
Introduction involve intentional and non-judgmental focus of one's attention on emotions, thoughts and sensations that are occurring in the present moment. The aim is to open awareness to present experiences,
More informationMortality in relation to alcohol consumption: a prospective study among male British doctors
IJE vol.34 no.1 International Epidemiological Association 2005; all rights reserved. International Journal of Epidemiology 2005;34:199 204 Advance Access publication 12 January 2005 doi:10.1093/ije/dyh369
More informationMéta régression (MR) Marc Sznajder, Patricia Samb (décors: Roger Hart Costumes: Donald Cardwell ) Staff DIHSP janvier 2009
Méta régression (MR) Marc Sznajder, Patricia Samb (décors: Roger Hart Costumes: Donald Cardwell ) Staff DIHSP janvier 2009 1 Références de Koning L, Merchant AT, Pogue J, Anand SS. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:850-6.
More informationThe Placebo Attributable Fraction in General Medicine: Protocol for a metaepidemiological
Fixed and uploaded on September 4, 2018 The Placebo Attributable Fraction in General Medicine: Protocol for a metaepidemiological Study of Cochrane Reviews Yusuke Tsutsumi1, 2, Yasushi Tsujimoto1, 3, Aran
More informationResults. NeuRA Worldwide incidence April 2016
Introduction The incidence of schizophrenia refers to how many new cases there are per population in a specified time period. It is different from prevalence, which refers to how many existing cases there
More informationThe Meta on Meta-Analysis. Presented by Endia J. Lindo, Ph.D. University of North Texas
The Meta on Meta-Analysis Presented by Endia J. Lindo, Ph.D. University of North Texas Meta-Analysis What is it? Why use it? How to do it? Challenges and benefits? Current trends? What is meta-analysis?
More informationSystematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist. MOOSE Checklist Infliximab reduces hospitalizations and surgery interventions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease:
More informationBias and confounding special issues. Outline for evaluation of bias
EPIDEMIOLOGI BIAS special issues and discussion of paper April 2009 Søren Friis Institut for Epidemiologisk Kræftforskning Kræftens Bekæmpelse AGENDA Bias and confounding special issues Confounding by
More informationHow to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice
Acta Orthopaedica ISSN: 1745-3674 (Print) 1745-3682 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iort20 How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice
More informationheterogeneity in meta-analysis stats methodologists meeting 3 September 2015
heterogeneity in meta-analysis stats methodologists meeting 3 September 2015 basic framework k experiments (i=1 k) each gives an estimate x i of θ, with variance s i 2 best overall estimate is weighted
More informationEvidence profile. Physical Activity. Background on the scoping question. Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO)
Evidence profile Q6: Is advice on physical activity better (more effective than/as safe as) than treatment as usual in adults with depressive episode/disorder with inactive lifestyles? Background on the
More informationResults. NeuRA Family relationships May 2017
Introduction Familial expressed emotion involving hostility, emotional over-involvement, and critical comments has been associated with increased psychotic relapse in people with schizophrenia, so these
More informationResults. NeuRA Forensic settings April 2016
Introduction Prevalence quantifies the proportion of individuals in a population who have a disease during a specific time period. Many studies have reported a high prevalence of various health problems,
More informationSurveillance report Published: 6 April 2016 nice.org.uk. NICE All rights reserved.
Surveillance report 2016 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in over 16s: diagnosis and management (2010) NICE guideline CG101 Surveillance report Published: 6 April 2016 nice.org.uk NICE 2016. All rights
More informationC2 Training: August 2010
C2 Training: August 2010 Introduction to meta-analysis The Campbell Collaboration www.campbellcollaboration.org Pooled effect sizes Average across studies Calculated using inverse variance weights Studies
More informationCochrane Bone, Joint & Muscle Trauma Group How To Write A Protocol
A p r i l 2 0 0 8 Cochrane Bone, Joint & Muscle Trauma Group How To Write A Protocol This booklet was originally produced by the Cochrane Renal Group to make the whole process of preparing a protocol as
More informationHow should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE Statist. Med. 2002; 21:1559 1573 (DOI: 10.1002/sim.1187) How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Simon G. Thompson ; and Julian P. T. Higgins MRC Biostatistics
More informationHow to describe bivariate data
Statistics Corner How to describe bivariate data Alessandro Bertani 1, Gioacchino Di Paola 2, Emanuele Russo 1, Fabio Tuzzolino 2 1 Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and
More informationTranscranial Direct-Current Stimulation
Introduction (tdcs) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation similar to transcranial magnetic stimulation, but instead of using magnets, it uses a lowintensity, constant current applied through scalp
More informationPropensity score methods to adjust for confounding in assessing treatment effects: bias and precision
ISPUB.COM The Internet Journal of Epidemiology Volume 7 Number 2 Propensity score methods to adjust for confounding in assessing treatment effects: bias and precision Z Wang Abstract There is an increasing
More informationHow to interpret results of metaanalysis
How to interpret results of metaanalysis Tony Hak, Henk van Rhee, & Robert Suurmond Version 1.0, March 2016 Version 1.3, Updated June 2018 Meta-analysis is a systematic method for synthesizing quantitative
More informationDoes Body Mass Index Adequately Capture the Relation of Body Composition and Body Size to Health Outcomes?
American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health All rights reserved Vol. 147, No. 2 Printed in U.S.A A BRIEF ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Does
More informationACR OA Guideline Development Process Knee and Hip
ACR OA Guideline Development Process Knee and Hip 1. Literature searching frame work Literature searches were developed based on the scenarios. A comprehensive search strategy was used to guide the process
More informationEfficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia Block B M, Liu S S, Rowlingson A J, Cowan A R, Cowan J A, Wu C L
Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia Block B M, Liu S S, Rowlingson A J, Cowan A R, Cowan J A, Wu C L CRD summary This review evaluated the efficacy of post-operative epidural analgesia. The authors
More information