Why has the Commission presented these fundamental proposals for change to the system of excise duty on tobacco?
|
|
- Emil Allen
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Excise duty on tobacco products: frequently asked questions MEMO/01/87 Brussels, 15th March 2001 Excise duty on tobacco products: frequently asked questions (See also IP/01/368) Why has the Commission presented these fundamental proposals for change to the system of excise duty on tobacco? A large number of Member States requested this at the time of conclusion of the previous review of tobacco taxation (see IP/98/485) which focussed only on technical adjustments to correct problems in implementing the Community rules for the taxation of tobacco products which exist since The Commission agreed with Member States that a more in-depth review of the structure and rates of excise duty on tobacco products was necessary. Despite the current Community rules, tobacco prices and excise rates still vary widely between the Member States and this distorts the functioning of the Internal Market. Furthermore, the Commission feels that enhanced tax convergence is necessary in order to improve the excise system before the forthcoming enlargement of the European Union. The present proposal and report are the result of a broad consultation process with national administrations and business and interest groups. What amendments does the Commission propose concerning the taxation of cigarettes and why has it introduced these amendments? The Commission has proposed the introduction of a fixed minimum amount of taxation of cigarettes expressed in euros in addition to the current 57% minimum excise incidence rule in order to guarantee a minimum level of excise duties on cigarettes in all Member States. At present, the rule is that excise duties levied on cigarettes by the Member States must include a proportional (ad valorem) component, expressed as a percentage of the maximum retail selling price and a specific component (a fixed amount per unit of the product). The level of these two components must be such that, in the case of cigarettes belonging to the most popular price category, their combination amounts to at least 57% of the retail selling price inclusive of all taxes including VAT. The 57% rule alone alone has not prevented the perpetuation of wide differences in rates and retail price levels. As a consequence the Commission believes that a minimum fixed amount in euros should be introduced in addition to the 57% test. Under the Commission proposal, Member States' excise duties would have to meet two requirements: the 57% minimum excise incidence and an amount of 70 per 1000 cigarettes of the price category most in demand. The Commission believes that a minimum fixed amount of this kind would ensure more convergence of levels of excise taxes on tobacco within the EU and would also significantly reduce the incentive for smuggling between Member States. It should be noted, however, that the introduction of a fixed amount of 70 per 1000 cigarettes does not mean that all cigarettes on the market will have to be subject to an excise amount of at least this amount. It only means that Member States have to fix their excise duty rates in such a way that they
2 reach this minimum amount of 70 only for cigarettes in the most popular price category. Thus, in Member States which have to increase their rates to reach the amount of 70, the amount of excise duty on cigarettes which are cheaper than the most popular price category will remain lower than 70. The amount of excise duty on cigarettes which are more expensive than the most popular price category will be higher than this amount. The same rule applies for the other minimum requirement of 57%. The present system sometimes obliges Member States which already have high tax levels to increase their excise rates further merely to comply with the 57 % minimum excise incidence rule. Is there a provision in the proposal to solve this problem? Yes. A clause has been included in the Commission proposal to ensure that the Member States where price levels are high would not have to keep raising excise duty to comply with the 57% rule. It is not logical that a Member State like Sweden with a very significant excise charge should have difficulty in meeting the 57% excise rule, because cigarette prices there are also high, whilst Member States where price levels are relatively low may meet the 57% requirement but still have a very low incidence of overall excise duty. Therefore, the Commission proposes that Member States applying an effective excise charge of at least 100 per 1000 cigarettes for the price category most in demand should not have to apply the 57% rule, so as to ensure that those high-price Member States are not obliged to increase continuously their excise rates to meet the 57 % rule. What are the consequences for Member States of the introduction of the fixed minimum amount of 70 per 1000 cigarettes in the most popular price category? The proposed introduction of a minimum specific excise duty of 70 per 1000 cigarettes would lead to an increase in excise duty on cigarettes in the five Member States currently applying the lowest specific excise duty (Spain, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Luxembourg). For Member States where the immediate introduction of this minimum euro amount would be problematic for economic reasons, the Commission report suggests that a phased introduction spread over a limited period of time could be considered. Such a phased introduction may also have to be considered for candidate countries upon accession to the EU given that price levels for cigarettes including taxes are much lower in most candidate countries than in the EU. Would the Commission proposal amend the structure of excise duties on cigarettes? No. At present, Member States have to apply both a specific (a fixed amount per 1000 cigarettes) and a proportional (or 'ad valorem') excise duty on cigarettes. The specific component of the excise duty may not be less than 5% or more than 55% of the amount of the total tax burden resulting from the aggregation of the proportional excise duty, the specific excise duty and the turnover tax levied on these cigarettes. This system provides the Member States sufficient flexibility to determine freely the relative weight of both excise elements, having regard to the characteristics of their national market for cigarettes. No amendment is proposed to this system. Member States must always, of course, comply with the rule of applying a minimum taxation of 57 % and 70 for cigarettes in the most popular price category. The proposed additional requirement of applying a minimum taxation equivalent to 70 for the cigarettes of the most popular price category does not affect this flexibility. Are other amendments proposed regarding the taxation of cigarettes? The only additional amendment proposed concerning cigarette taxation would be to allow Member States more flexibility in the imposition of a minimum level of taxation on cigarettes. On a number of occasions Member States have been confronted with the appearance of cheap cigarettes on their domestic market, often with disruptive effects.
3 To combat this situation, the tobacco legislation allows Member States to apply a minimum level of taxation on cigarettes irrespective of the sales price provided that this does not have the effect of raising the total tax to more than 90% of the total tax on the most popular price category of cigarettes. This rule has proven to be inadequate to deal with price wars and/or increases in supply at the lower end of the market. The Commission proposal would therefore dispense with the 90% rule and would allow Member States to levy a minimum excise duty on cigarettes provided only that the amount did not exceed the excise duty levied on cigarettes belonging to the most popular price category. What are the amendments proposed concerning fine-cut tobacco intended for the rolling of cigarettes and why they are being proposed? The Commission proposal suggests amending the existing provisions relating to the taxation of finecut rolling tobacco in two ways. It proposes gradually aligning the minimum percentage rates for rolling tobacco with the minimum for cigarettes and adjusting the minimum euro amounts for this tobacco (and other non-cigarette tobacco) in line with inflation. That would raise the minimum incidence for rolling tobacco from 30% to 39% and the minimum specific duty to 34 over a period of three years. The substantial differences between Member States in tax levels on rolling tobacco, combined with major differences in pre-tax prices, encourage smuggling between neighbouring countries and give rise to distortions in the Internal Market. There is also a big difference at Community level between the minimum excise incidence for cigarettes of the price category most in demand and the minimum rates for rolling tobacco which are either 30% of the retail selling price or 25 per kilogram. The Commission is well aware of the fact that the two products have different characteristics: cigarettes are factory-made, while rolling tobacco is a semi-finished product used by consumers who roll their own cigarettes and have to buy additional materials for that purpose. On the other hand the two products compete, since an increase in the price of cigarettes often results in smokers switching to hand-rolling tobacco. From a health point of view, both products are harmful and in that sense there is little justification for a wide variation in the rates at Community level. Many Member States already maintain a certain ratio between the taxation of rolling tobacco and cigarettes although there is no obligation at present to do so. The Commission therefore believes that the minimum rate for rolling tobacco should be brought more closely into alignment with the 57% rule applying to cigarettes. Given the different characteristics of the two products, an adjustment of the minimum rate for fine-cut rolling tobacco up to two/third of the minimum excise incidence for cigarettes seems reasonable. Member States which do not currently maintain such a ratio between their rates for cigarettes and rolling tobacco or which set their rates at a very low level will be given the necessary time to adjust to the new minimum rates. The following gradual changes are proposed to the rates and amounts: 1/1/2002: minimum rate of 33 % of the retail selling price inclusive of all taxes or 28 per kilogram 1/1/2003: minimum rate of 36 % of the retail selling price inclusive of all taxes or 31 per kilogram 1/1/2004: minimum rate of 39 % of the retail selling price inclusive of all taxes or 34 per kilogram. Does the Commission propose amendments concerning the taxation of other smoking tobacco?
4 The Commission only proposes adjusting the specific minimum amount expressed in euros in line with inflation, starting from 1 January The specific minimum rate for other smoking tobacco would therefore be set at 20 at 1 January There would be no change to the ad valorem rate. Why does the Commission propose an amendment to the definition of cigars and cigarillos? An amendment of the definition of cigars and cigarillos is proposed to take into account the changes in products offered on the tobacco market. In particular, a relatively new product has recently become popular in a number of Member States. In terms of function, taste, filter and presentation this product can be regarded as a cigarette or cigarette substitute, except that it has the colour of a cigar instead of the white colour of a cigarette. The wrapper is filled with cut tobacco instead of a threshed blend and the manufacturing process is similar to that for cigarettes. Application of the current definition obliges Member States to tax the product at the rate of excise duties for cigars (minimum of only 5%) instead of the excise duties for cigarettes (minimum of 57 %). Due to the lower tax rate, the product is cheaper and quite attractive, especially for young smokers. Because this product is similar to cigarettes, as well as for health protection, the Commission is proposing that the lower minimum rate for cigars should be restricted to the products to which it originally was meant to apply (cigars and cigarillos), the production of which has a more labour intensive character. Therefore, the proposal for a Directive would amendthe definition of cigars and cigarillos. Are any other changes proposed regarding cigars and cigarillos? The Commission also proposes adjusting the specific minimum amount expressed in euros in line with inflation, starting from 1 January 2003.The specific minimum rate for cigars and cigarillos would therefore be set at 11 at 1 January There would be no change to the ad valorem rate applicable to these products, as the lower level compared to that for other tobacco products can be justified by their more labour intensive production process. How are health concerns taken into consideration in this proposal? Excise duty is primarily an instrument for generating revenue at national level, but policy-making in this area has to take the wider objectives of the Treaty into account and try to reconcile these with improvements in the operation of the Internal Market. Given the characteristics of manufactured tobacco products, particular attention has therefore to be paid to health considerations and to the relationship between consumer protection and the price of the products. The level of taxation of tobacco products, through its impact on their final price, obviously has a significant effect on consumption. Taxation has to be seen as an important element of a policy aimed at reducing the consumption of tobacco. Health considerations are reflected in the proposal by the following measures: the introduction of a minimum fixed amount of 70 per 1000 cigarettes for cigarettes of the most popular price category order to guarantee a minimum level of excise duties on cigarettes in all Member States
5 the alignment of the minimum rate for fine-cut tobacco intended for the rolling of cigarettes on the minimum incidence for cigarettes the adjustment of the minimum specific amounts for other tobacco products in line with inflation the amendment of the definition for cigars and cigarillos to prevent products similar to cigarettes becoming cheaper than cigarettes and therefore increasingly attractive to consumers. Why does the Commission propose lengthening the review period from 3 to 4 years? The Commission takes the view that a three-year period is too short a period in which to assess changes in Member States' legislation. A four-year period would be more appropriate for assessing the operation of the Internal Market and the influence of any changes in legislation. Taking into account the time required for discussions in the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, it would be logical to provide that the four-year period for the next review should run from the time discussions on the previous review in the Council are finalised. This does not prevent the Commission from making proposals on its own initiative at any time before the end of the four-year period where it considers this necessary or where account needs to be taken of changes on the tobacco market. Will the new proposal contribute to ensuring convergence between Member States of rates of excise duties on tobacco? Yes. Rate convergence has to be considered from two different perspectives: A convergence of the divergence between Member States in the total percentage of excise duties on tobacco. The percentage rates currently range from % to %. A convergence of the divergence between Member States in the real amount of excises on cigarettes. A present the amounts range from to per 1000 cigarettes in the most popular price category a difference of about 430 %. The proposal will oblige the Member States with the lowest real rates to increase their excises on cigarettes. On the other hand, the Member States where cigarette prices are high and therefore tax is already high will not be obliged to increase their rates further merely so as to comply with the minimum of 57 %. This is bound to lead to greater excise convergence. Should not excise rates reflect local economic and social conditions? At present, income and purchasing power per capita differ widely between Member States. Differences in excise rates and cigarettes prices are well in excess of differences between Member States' per capita gross domestic product, expressed in purchasing power standards. As the proposal does not propose any amendments to the structure of the tax on tobacco (i.e. to the relative proportions of the ad valorem rate and specific excise duty) Member States will continue to have sufficient flexibility to fix their tax levels on the basis of local and regional policies such as in those in the area of employment and health. Won't the proposal worsen the situation of candidate countries for accession to the EU? Both the position of Member States and that of candidate countries must be considered.
6 At present there is a high level of fraud and smuggling of tobacco products from the candidate countries to the Member States. Therefore, it is necessary that a minimum amount of excise duty is ensured in the present and enlarged Internal Market. A number of Member States have already expressed their concerns about the consequences on their own national cigarette markets of the accession of the candidate countries if there are no modifications to the existing excise system, in which a mere minimum percentage is applied to prices which differ enormously. As far as the position of candidate countries is concerned, the report proposes that transitional measures could be taken in order to help them to achieve the minimum excise amount on a gradual basis. Won't inflation rise in Member States which have to increase their tobacco excise rates? The overall impact will in general be quite limited. Only 5 Member States will be obliged to increase their rates. The Commission report proposes that a transitional period could be considered for these Member States so as to allow them some additional time to reach the minimum amount. Cigarette prices have already in the past increased in excess of inflation. These increases do not appear to have caused significant problems, given that in general the inflation level in the EU is on the low side (between 2 and 3 %). Furthermore, the relative weight of expenditure on cigarettes in the global price index should not be overestimated. In some Member States, these products are even excluded from the price index. Should there not be an approach based on a minimum fiscal incidence (i.e. a combination of excise duty and VAT) instead of a minimum excise incidence? The introduction of such a system would not guarantee greater excise convergence between Member States. Such a system would not put an end to the present need for high cigarette price Member States to introduce excise increases merely so as to comply with the minimum incidence rule. It would also not guarantee greater rate convergence. The gap between the Member States would even become bigger since the new percentages would still have to be applied to very different prices.
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/64/EU
L 176/24 Official Journal of the European Union 5.7.2011 DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codification)
More informationremoving the concept of the most popular price category (MPPC) and applying minimum tax rules to all cigarette price categories;
European Heart Network s response to the European Commission s Consultation Paper on the structure and rates of excise duty applied on cigarettes and other manufactured tobacco. June 2007 Summary and Recommendations
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL. on Directive 2011/64/EU on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.1.2018 COM(2018) 17 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL on Directive 2011/64/EU on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco EN
More informationPhilip Morris International s Position Statement on the Revision of the Tobacco Excise Directive. 14 February 2017
Philip Morris International s Position Statement on the Revision of the Tobacco Excise Directive 14 February 2017 1 Contents Introduction... 3 Revision of the Tobacco Excise Directive... 4 Scope of the
More informationPublic consultation - Excise duties applied to manufactured tobacco
Public consultation - Excise duties applied to manufactured tobacco Fields marked with * are mandatory. Background information Council directive 2011/64/EU sets out EU rules on the structure and rates
More informationImpact of excise tax on price, consumption and revenue
Impact of excise tax on price, consumption and revenue Introduction Increase in tobacco tax that leads to price increase is expected to reduce tobacco consumption and improve public health. This section
More informationA public health perspective for the review of the EU tax policy on tobacco products
WHO-Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) The Parties recognize that price and tax measures are an effective and important means of reducing tobacco consumption by various segments of the population,
More informationThe alcohol market is in need of a thorough review
Summary Alcohol, tobacco and gambling create costs for Swedish society in the form of production losses and extra expenditure for the public sector, for example. At the same time, these goods are valuable
More informationEffective Tobacco Tax Reform: Evidence from China
Effective Tobacco Tax Reform: Evidence from China Rose Zheng Director, WHO Collaborating Center for Tobacco and Economics Professor, University of International Business and Economics (UIBE), Beijing,
More informationThe Independent British Vape Trade Association (IBVTA) welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation.
Dear Sir, Public consultation on excise duties applied to manufactured tobacco The Independent British Vape Trade Association (IBVTA) welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation. IBVTA is
More informationBRIEFING: ARGUMENTS AGAINST MINIMUM PRICING FOR ALCOHOL
BRIEFING: ARGUMENTS AGAINST MINIMUM PRICING FOR ALCOHOL Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP) was established by the Scottish Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties to raise awareness about
More informationTAXUD/2012/DE/341 Specific contract No4 under FWC TAXUD/2012/CC116. mmmll
Study on the measuring and reducing of administrative costs for economic operators and tax authorities and obtaining in parallel a higher level of compliance and security in imposing excise duties on tobacco
More informationPUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C Public Health and Risk Assessment POSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT
More informationPOSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT
POSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC DG SANCO 2010 PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Answer given by the General Direction of Public Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Social
More informationThe Effectiveness of Tobacco Tax & Price Policies for Tobacco Control Frank J. Chaloupka University of Illinois at Chicago
The Effectiveness of Tobacco Tax & Price Policies for Tobacco Control Frank J. Chaloupka University of Illinois at Chicago The 10 th Asia Pacific Conference on Tobacco or Health Symposium 11 Makuhari Messe,
More informationUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Country profile United Kingdom of Great Britain and rthern Ireland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationCountry profile. Republic of Moldova
Country profile Republic of Moldova WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 February 2009 Socioeconomic
More informationIdentifying best practice in actions on tobacco smoking to reduce health inequalities
Identifying best practice in actions on tobacco smoking to reduce health inequalities An Matrix Knowledge Report to the Consumers, Health and Food Executive Agency, funded by the Health Programme of the
More informationRaising Tobacco Taxes A Summary of Evidence from the NCI-WHO Monograph on the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control
Raising Tobacco Taxes A Summary of Evidence from the NCI-WHO Monograph on the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control Jeremias N. Paul Jr. Coordinator, Tobacco Control Economics (TCE) Prevention of Noncommunicable
More informationCountry profile. New Zealand
Country profile New Zealand WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 27 January 2004 Socioeconomic context
More informationCountry profile. Ukraine
Country profile Ukraine WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 June 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Italy
Country profile Italy WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 2 July 2008 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Sweden
Country profile Sweden WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 July 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26.5.2004 COM(2004) 223 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the rates
More informationThe Cigarette Market in Greece
The Cigarette Market in Greece Product Code: CG0145MR Published Date: April 2015 Report Price: US$ 975 (Single Copy) Synopsis Cigarettes in Greece report is a qualitative report providing extensive and
More informationACHIEVING SMOKEFREE AOTEAROA BY2025
ACHIEVING SMOKEFREE AOTEAROA BY2025 Monitoring and evaluation plan CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Logic model 3 Sources of information 4 Monitoring progress towards the SFA 2025 goal 4 System
More informationCountry profile. Trinidad and Tobago
Country profile Trinidad and Tobago WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 27 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 19 August 2004 Socioeconomic
More informationGenerating Revenue & Cutting Costs The Health & Economic Benefits of Tobacco Control
Generating Revenue & Cutting Costs The Health & Economic Benefits of Tobacco Control Frank J. Chaloupka, University of Illinois at Chicago Ministerial Leadership in Health Harvard University, 19 April
More informationCountry profile. Hungary
Country profile Hungary WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 April 2004 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Austria
Country profile Austria WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 28 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2005 Socioeconomic context
More informationTHE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO TAXATION IN BANGLADESH
THE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO TAXATION IN BANGLADESH Abul Barkat, PhD Professor of Economics, University of Dhaka & Chief Advisor (Hon.), HDRC Email: info@hdrc-bd.com Advocacy for Tobacco Taxation
More informationTonga s tobacco taxes. Published on September 24, By Sutayut Osornprasop
Tonga s tobacco taxes By Sutayut Osornprasop All four major non-communicable diseases (NCDs) diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and respiratory diseases in Tonga are on the rise. According to the
More information2008 EUROBAROMETER SURVEY ON TOBACCO
8 EUROBAROMETER SURVEY ON TOBACCO KEY MSAG Support for smoke-free places: The survey confirms the overwhelming support that smoke-free policies have in the EU. A majority of EU citizens support smoke-free
More informationThe Economics of Tobacco Control and Tobacco Taxation: Challenges & Opportunities for a Tobacco Free Turkey
The Economics of Tobacco Control and Tobacco Taxation: Challenges & Opportunities for a Tobacco Free Turkey Ayda A. Yürekli, WHO, on behalf of author team Ankara, December 23, 2010 With funding from the
More informationAsia Illicit Tobacco Indicator 2016: Singapore. Prepared by Oxford Economics October 2017
Asia Illicit Tobacco Indicator 216: Singapore Prepared by Oxford Economics October 217 Disclaimer The Asia Illicit Tobacco Indicator 216 Report (the Report ) on the illicit tobacco trade in selected Asian
More information1. This paper reports on the findings of the independent evaluation into the impact of the increases in tobacco excise duty.
In-Confidence Office of the Associate Minister of Health Chair, Cabinet Social Wellbeing Committee FINDINGS OF THE EVALUATION OF TOBACCO EXCISE INCREASES Proposal 1. This paper reports on the findings
More informationThe Cigarette Market in Netherlands
The Cigarette Market in Netherlands Product Code: CG0148MR Published Date: April 2015 Report Price: US$ 975 (Single Copy) Synopsis Cigarettes in Austria report is a qualitative report providing extensive
More informationBosnia and Herzegovina
Country profile Bosnia and Herzegovina WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 July 2009 Socioeconomic context
More informationCountry profile. Senegal
Country profile Senegal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 19 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 27 January 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationAttitudes, Awareness and Understanding
TMA Smokers Anti-Illicit Trade Survey 2018: Attitudes, Awareness and Understanding In April and May 2018, the TMA commissioned a nationwide poll of adult smokers to understand their attitudes, awareness
More informationAlcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Bill. WM Morrison Supermarkets. 1.1 Morrisons has 56 stores and employs over 14,000 people in Scotland.
Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Bill WM Morrison Supermarkets 1. Introduction 1.1 Morrisons has 56 stores and employs over 14,000 people in Scotland. 1.2 Morrisons welcomes the opportunity to respond
More informationTobacco taxation policy in the Republic of Moldova
Tobacco taxation policy in the Republic of Moldova Acknowledgements We thank Ghenadie Turcanu, program coordinator, Center for Health Policies and Studies for providing additional data and reviewing the
More informationSummary Report. Public consultation on excise duties applied to manufactured tobacco and the possible taxation of novel products
Summary Report Public consultation on excise duties applied to manufactured tobacco and the possible taxation of novel products 1. ackground ouncil Directive 2011/64/EU (the Directive ) sets out EU rules
More informationCountry profile. Poland
Country profile Poland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 14 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Russian Federation. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status
Country profile Russian Federation WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 June 2008 Socioeconomic context
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.7.2016 C(2016) 4592 final COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 26.7.2016 concerning national provisions notified by Finland prohibiting the placing on the market of certain
More informationCountry profile. Angola
Country profile Angola WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Indonesia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
Country profile Indonesia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t signed t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationRaising tobacco taxes in Bangladesh in FY : An opportunity for development
Raising tobacco taxes in Bangladesh in FY 2018-2019: An opportunity for development Raising tobacco taxes would: Generate extra revenues between BDT 75 billion and 100 billion. Reduce the number of current
More informationCountry profile. Norway
Country profile rway WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 16 June 2003 Socioeconomic context Population
More information2015 Pre Budget Submission
Employee Handbook of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland Royal College of Physicians of Ireland 2015 Pre Budget Submission June 2014 RCPI Recommendations for Budget 2015... 3 Introduction... 4 Alcohol
More informationCountry profile. Cuba
Country profile Cuba WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Timor-Leste
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Timor-Leste WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 May 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationCountry profile. Gambia
Country profile Gambia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 18 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationLao People's Democratic Republic
Country profile Lao People's Democratic Republic WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 September 2006
More informationCountry profile. Bahrain. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007
Country profile Bahrain WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Myanmar
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Myanmar WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 23 October 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationCountry profile. Turkmenistan. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011
Country profile Turkmenistan WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationOpen Letter to Financial Secretary, Hong Kong SAR Government
Open Letter to Financial Secretary, Hong Kong SAR Government 1 6 February 2018 Raising Tobacco Tax by 100% to Lower Smoking Prevalence and Achieve Tobacco Endgame in 2027 Hong Kong: Tobacco kills nearly
More informationCountry profile. Gambia. Note: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table.
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011 Country profile Gambia te: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table. WHO Framework Convention
More informationPolicies on access and prices
Policies on access and prices Rosa Carolina Sandoval, MPA San Juan, Puerto Rico March 15, 2006 Access policies Youth access laws: designed to limit the availability of tobacco from commercial sources to
More informationUC San Francisco WHO Tobacco Control Papers
UC San Francisco WHO Tobacco Control Papers Title Report on Tobacco Taxation in the United Kingdom Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5mq1r4pm Authors World Health Organization Excise Social Policy
More informationAlcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Bill. Wine and Spirit Trade Association
Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Bill Wine and Spirit Trade Association The Wine and Spirit Trade Association (WSTA) is the UK organisation for the wine and spirit industry representing over 340 companies
More informationCountry profile. Lebanon
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Lebanon WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 4 March 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationCountry profile. Nepal
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Nepal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 3 December 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationTOBACCO CONTROL ECONOMICS TOBACCO FREE INITIATIVE PREVENTION OF NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES
Page 1 1. Smoking prevalence The rate of smoking tends to increase with development reflecting higher prevalence of cigarette use among women as incomes increase. The rate of smoking is relatively high
More informationCountry profile. Yemen
Country profile Yemen WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 20 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 22 February 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Egypt
Country profile Egypt WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 17 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 25 February 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Switzerland
Country profile Switzerland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Brazil
Country profile Brazil WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 vember 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationTHE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO CONTROL, A DEVELOPMENT ISSUE. ANNETTE DIXON, WORLD BANK DIRECTOR, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
THE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO CONTROL, A DEVELOPMENT ISSUE. ANNETTE DIXON, WORLD BANK DIRECTOR, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SECTOR EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION The facts and figures clearly show the enormous
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 23.11.2009 SEC(2009) 1621 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation of 2 December 2002 on the prevention
More informationPrice-based measures to reduce alcohol consumption
Price-based measures to reduce alcohol consumption Andrew Leicester (with Rachel Griffith and Martin O Connell) Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen 12 th March 2013 Introduction Governments
More informationCountry profile. Chad
Country profile Chad WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 22 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 30 January 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationAsia Illicit Tobacco Indicator 2016: New Zealand. Prepared by Oxford Economics November 2017
Asia Illicit Tobacco Indicator 216: New Zealand Prepared by Oxford Economics November 217 Disclaimer The Asia Illicit Tobacco Indicator 216 Report (the Report ) on the illicit tobacco trade in selected
More informationTobacco Free Ireland Action Plan
Tobacco Free Ireland Action Plan Tobacco Free Ireland, the report of the Tobacco Policy Review Group, was endorsed by Government, and published in October 2013. It builds on existing tobacco control policies
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tobacco Control
The Economic Impact of Tobacco Control Tobacco Industry SCARE Tactics Tobacco Industry SCARE tactics and misinformation deter governments from raising tobacco taxes and implementing effective tobacco control
More informationCountry profile. Canada
Country profile Canada WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 15 July 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 26 vember 2004 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationTOBACCO TAXATION, TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY, AND TOBACCO USE
TOBACCO TAXATION, TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY, AND TOBACCO USE Frank J. Chaloupka Director, ImpacTeen, University of Illinois at Chicago www.uic.edu/~fjc www.impacteen.org The Fact is, Raising Tobacco Prices
More informationMeasuring Illicit Tobacco Markets
3rd International Conference on Governance, Crime and Justice Statistics UNODC- INEGI Merida (Mexico) 7-10 June 2016 Measuring Illicit Tobacco Markets Ernesto U. Savona Director and Professor (ernesto.savona@unicatt.it)
More informationHigher rate now: Why excise tax on tobacco is long overdue for an increase
Higher rate now: Why excise tax on tobacco is long overdue for an increase Canadian Medical Association: Submission to the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce A healthy population
More informationDesigning a Smoke-Free Future
Designing a Smoke-Free Future Morgan Stanley Global Consumer & Retail Conference New York, November 14, 2017 Jacek Olczak Chief Financial Officer Martin King President, Asia Region Forward-Looking and
More informationIllicit and illegal tobacco in North Central and North East London A report on smokers perceptions, supply and demand
Illicit and illegal tobacco in North Central and North East London A report on smokers perceptions, supply and demand Glenn Stewart, Miho Yoshizaki Public Health London Borough of Enfield November 2015
More informationCider Duty in the Republic of Ireland
Cider Duty in the Republic of Ireland Summary The Republic of Ireland s tax system ensures that white cider cannot be sold at extremely low prices There, cider above 6.0% ABV is taxed at a much higher
More informationName European Smoking Tobacco Association (European Commission s register of interest representatives: )
Ref. Ares(2011)1003833-22/09/2011 Public consultation on the possible revision of the Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC Meta Informations Creation date 13-12-2010 Last update date User name null Case
More informationCountry profile. Colombia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008
Country profile Colombia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationIran (Islamic Republic of)
Country profile Iran (Islamic Republic of) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 November 2005 Socioeconomic
More informationThe Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Taxation in Bangladesh: Abul Barkat et.al
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01. Increase price of cigarette and Bidi by 33% (include this in the upcoming FY 2008-09 National Budget). This will decrease use rate by 14% and 9% in short and long-run respectively;
More informationFactors influencing European cigarette markets in the short and mid term. Christoph Ihmels, ERA Packaging Conference
Factors influencing European cigarette markets in the short and mid term Christoph Ihmels,11.10.2006 ERA Packaging Conference British American Tobacco in Germany Founded in 1926 Sites in Hamburg, Bayreuth
More informationReport on the alcohol laws in EU countries. Prepared by: Daša Kokole, Rok Primožič and Lukas Galkus, APYN
Report on the alcohol laws in EU countries Prepared by: Daša Kokole, Rok Primožič and Lukas Galkus, APYN The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute endorsement
More informationSelf-regulation program for the sale of tobacco products
Self-regulation program for the sale of tobacco products Section 12 c of the Tobacco Act (1993:581) ENGELSKA Good to know about the self-regulation program Persons intending to sell tobacco products to
More informationChallenges ahead to reach the goal set up in Tobacco End Game 2025
Challenges ahead to reach the goal set up in Tobacco End Game 2025 Dr Vera Luiza da Costa e Silva Head of the Convention Secretariat WHO FCTC 12 June 2018 Towards the end game 1. Where are we? 2. What
More informationProblem Which option Additional option Additional comments definition Yes No change No further observations.
Department of Health, United Kingdom electronic contribution rec. 317 - by Mr Lee McGill lee.mcgill@dh.gsi.gov.uk Question 1 - scope Problem Which option Recommend option Additional comments Yes No change
More informationCountry profile. Guinea
Country profile Guinea WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 1 April 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 vember 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationReducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Interventions to Increase the Unit Price for Tobacco Products
Reducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Interventions to Increase the Unit Price for Tobacco Products Task Force Finding and Rationale Statement Table of Contents Intervention Definition...
More informationCountry profile. Morocco
Country profile Morocco WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 April 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationHow Price Increases Reduce Tobacco Use
How Price Increases Reduce Tobacco Use Frank J. Chaloupka Director, ImpacTeen, University of Illinois at Chicago www.uic.edu/~fjc www.impacteen.org www.tobaccoevidence.net TUPTI, Kansas City, July 8 2002
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement. Increase in Tobacco Excise and Equivalent Duties
Regulatory Impact Statement Increase in Tobacco Excise and Equivalent Duties Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by The Treasury. It analyses options to raise
More informationAnnual General Meeting of Shareholders of Philip Morris ČR a.s. Kutná Hora April 25, András Tövisi Chairman of the Board of Directors
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Philip Morris ČR a.s. Kutná Hora April 25, 2014 András Tövisi Chairman of the Board of Directors Philip Morris ČR a.s. Annual General Meeting of Shareholders 2014
More information