European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels January 2007

Similar documents
European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels 9 10 February Update on Fusarium mycotoxins - data from the starch industry

Fusarium-toxins. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

BASF Plant Science Amflora Facts. Content

6 th EC Forum on Fusarium toxins. Brussels, February, 2009

Mycotoxins in high moisture grain silages and ensiled grain by-products

Food Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Management at a European Level

Mycocheck Survey 2014

Starch. A vital ingredient in our diets

Mycotoxins, MRL s & food chain contaminations

Guidance on the application of Commission Recommendation 2013/165/EU on the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal products

From risk assessment to risk management focus on contaminants. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

SUPPLY BALANCE SHEETS

T-2, HT-2 2 and deoxynivalenol (DON) in malting barley and malt

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

MYCOTOXIN PROBLEMS? NEOGEN HAS THE SOLUTIONS

THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCING CORN STARCH IN ORMOŽ

An integrated approach to mycotoxin testing in the poultry feed chain. Bankok, March 2010

ECPA position paper on the criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties under Regulation

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST

Quality Grain Management Effects on the Feed Industry. Ben Weaver Regional Account Manager

ProSid TM. Making a difference in fighting mould problems. Feed additives that give key benefits

Solutions for Mycotoxin Testing. Comprehensive Innovative Reliable

Monitoring & Surveillance Series

Deoxynivalenol: Known Facts and Research Questions. DON (deoxynivalenol) is a damaging toxin produced by the fungus Fusarium

Removal of Mycotoxins during Food Processing

COMMUNICATION ON THE ALLERGEN LABELLING OF WHEAT STARCH DERIVATIVES

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

Fate of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereal Food Chain. Dr Clare Hazel, RHM Technology Mr Keith Scudamore, KAS Mycotoxins

1. Checklist for: Product Developers

Alcohol Prevention Day

Minnesota Wheat Research and Promotion Council RESEARCH PROPOSAL GRANT APPLICATION (2-pages maximum)

MYCOTOXIN PREVENTION CLUSTER

MATERIALS AND METHODS 68

Analytical Aspects of Mycotoxin Binders

EU policy on acrylamide in food reducing human exposure to ensure a high level of human health protection

DRAFT for a new REGULATION on the use of the Keyhole label in the marketing of foodstuffs

EFSA mycotoxin occurrence, data request & exposure assessment

FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT AFRICA CONFERENCE & EXPO

Crop Quality and the Role of Agronomists in FSMA

Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL) and the effects for the fruit and vegetable processing industry

Using science to establish effective food safety control for the European Union Dr David Jukes

Fumonisins are a significant health risk to livestock, and potentially also to humans , B 2

REGIONAL DIFFERENCES ON THE WORLDWIDE MYCOTOXIN OCCURRENCE. Copyright 2010 by Erber AG. Austria. All rights reserved.

ICGMA Report Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods Moscow, The Russian Federation 8 12 April 2013

RESIDUES AND WASTE FROM THE FOOD INDUSTRIES; PREPARED ANIMAL FODDER

Official Journal of the European Union COMMISSION

(notified under document C(2017) 4975) (Only the English text is authentic)

Mycotoxins and Poultry Health Natacha S. Hogan

VALIDATION REPORT Ochratoxin A ELISA (According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014)

Case No COMP/M CARGILL / CERESTAR. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/01/2002

Services and research to promote grain quality management

MRL setting and intakes for cereals. Annette Petersen

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH. (Section GM Food & Feed and Environmental Risk)

Overview of Mycotoxins in India with special reference to Aflatoxins. F Waliyar

Nutrient profiles for foods bearing claims

CONDUCTING AN EFFECTIVE ANIMAL FEED HAZARD EVALUATION

Emanuela Turla Scientific Officer Nutrition Unit - EFSA

FINAL DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Frequently Asked Questions "The abolition of EU sugar production quotas"

Ongoing review of legislation on cadmium in food in the EU: Background and current state of play

Risk Assessment on Food Allergy

Approaches for 100 percent organic feed to organic poultry in Sweden

Mycotoxin Detection & Solutions

COMPLETE FEEDS: ALL INGREDIENTS ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL!

Acrylamide in Food Guidance for bakers that supply businesses other than local retailers

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Agricultural Outlook Forum 2005 Presented: Thursday, February, 24, 2005

Reduction of mycotoxins in cereals through an Integrated Crop Management approach

Understanding and Managing Variation in Nutrient Composition

HT-2 and T-2 in Oats - What we know and what we need to know

Nanofeed Detector A Simple Gadget that Protects the Health of Farm Animals and it s Industry from Contaminated Feeds. Dr. Gil Nonato C.

Aflatoxin B1 in rice bran as feed material and following contamination of consumer milk in Sweden: case study

Randomness Rules: Living with Variation in the Nutrient Composition of Concentrate Feeds

Randomness Rules: Living with Variation in the Nutrient Composition of Concentrate Feeds 1

The Diploma in Ruminant Nutrition

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

* Chemical aspects of food safety and quality in the short supply chains

Feedback from the Member States questionnaire

FEED ADDITIVES FOR MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFICATION EFFICACY & AUTHORISATION

As extraction is done by critical CO 2

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Dietary exposure for risk assessment of GM foods. Ad hoc meeting with industry representatives Parma,

Issues and Opportunities Related to the Production and Marketing of Ethanol By-Products

Mycotoxin Detection and Solutions

Animal species. Member State EU/EEA. Route of administration. Strength. Applicant Name INN Pharmaceutical form. Austria 1

Free-Tox. No escape THE POLYVALENT MYCOTOXIN BINDER

Sorghum Malting: Introduction, Objectives, and Scientific Principles

International Starch Institute. TM7-8e THE DANISH STARCH INDUSTRY. Starch Technology

Science protecting consumers. from field to fork. Committed to ensuring that Europe s food is safe

Overview of European Legislation on Food Contaminants. Dr Iona Pratt, Food Safety Authority of Ireland

The Impact of the Ethanol Industry on Pork Production

ECOCERT CANADA LABELLING GUIDE. For Canadian Certified Organic Products. Version3

AB Kauno Grudai can offer: high quality premixes protein concentrates licks for cattle pre starter feed raw materials for feed industry.

European Coexistence Bureau. Coexistence of genetically modified maize and honey production

WORKABLE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, BRUSSELS 9 NOVEMBER 2016

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Modus Operandi for the management of new food safety incidents with a potential for extension involving a chemical substance

Brussels, 13 March 2002

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 09 JUNE 2015

Implications of Ingredient Availability Opportunities for Vegetable Protein Meals

The positive response S T RAIGHT S QUALITY STRAIGHTS AND CO-PRODUCT FEEDS

Transcription:

European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels 15-16 January 2007 Impact of the proposed limits of Fusarium mycotoxins in maize for the starch industry

AAF main facts and figures: 24 companies 72 plants Who we are AAF Members are located in 20 out of the 27 European countries (except in Luxembourg, Ireland, Malta, Cyprus, Estonia, Lithuania and Slovenia) European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 2/18

AAF members location European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 3/18

Raw materials The raw materials used to produce starch and starch derived products are: maize, wheat, barley, rice and potato. More than 95% of all raw materials processed by the starch industry originates from Europe 22.6 million tons of raw materials were used to produce 9.6 million tons of starch products in 2005 Of which, 7 million tons of maize grain used to produce 4.4 million tons of starch products The starch industry only processes food grade maize: it represents 70% of all European food grade maize European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 4/18

Starch industry applications Food and drinks, including e.g. Baby Foods Maize Wheat Barley Rice Potato Pet food and animal feed Paper and board Pharmaceuticals and cosmetics Industrial applications European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 5/18

Maize main starch products and co-products Maize >7 Million tons Co-Products Maize Gluten Feed Maize Protein Maize Germ Maize Oil 2.6 Million tons STARCH & STARCH DERIVED PRODUCTS Native starch, Modified starches, Glucose syrups, Maltodextrins, Dextrose Polyols, Fermentation products, Others 4.4 Million tons European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 6/18

General views on regulatory limits Regulatory limits set in the EU legislation: should be based on the ALARA principle are one option among other risk management tools should protect efficiently human and/or animal health without restricting trade should be based on sound scientific risk assessments and be proportionate should take fully into account the capacity of operators to be able to control the hazards (Fusarium mycotoxins are primarily a field-born issue) European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 7/18

DEOXYNIVALENOL in unprocessed maize (2003-2006) Percentages of samples above 1750 ppb in Deoxynivalenol 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 1750-2000 ppb 2000-2500 ppb >2500 ppb Total above limit 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2003 2004 2005 2006 Before 2003 (samples) % above 2000 ppb: 2000 0% (15) 2001 14% (74) 2002 12% (117) DON micrograms/kg (ppb) Number of samples 1750-2000 ppb 2000-2500 ppb >2500 ppb Total above limit 2003 296 5.7% 0.3% 0.0% 6.0% 2004 659 1.5% 2.0% 1.4% 4.9% 2005 394 1.5% 1.8% 2.0% 5.3% 2006 177 3.4% 3.4% 18.1% 24.9% NB: AAF Figures gathered by AAF members in 2006 are preliminary European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 8/18

ZEARALENONE in unprocessed maize (2000-2006) Percentages of samples above 200 ppb in Zearalenone 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 200-500 ppb >500 ppb Total above limit 5.0% 0.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 ZEA micrograms/kg (ppb) Number of samples 200-500 ppb >500 ppb Total above limit 2000 35 3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 2001 36 14.0% 8.0% 22.0% 2002 101 12.0% 4.0% 16.0% 2003 311 4.2% 3.0% 7.2% 2004 458 4.1% 1.8% 5.9% 2005 356 7.5% 0.8% 8.3% 2006 174 11.5% 11.5% 23.0% NB: AAF Figures gathered by AAF members in 2006 are preliminary European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 9/18

FUMONISINS B1 and B2 in unprocessed maize (2004-2006) Percentages of samples above 2000 ppb in Fumonisins* 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 2000-3000 ppb 3000-5000 ppb >5000 ppb Total above limit 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 *In 2003, 172 samples and only 2 ranges: 2000-3000 >3000 2003 8.7% 12.2% FUM O B1 + B2 micrograms/kg (ppb) Number of samples 2000-3000 ppb 3000-5000 ppb >5000 ppb Total above limit 2004 456 7.2% 10.5% 16.0% 33.7% 2005 435 6.2% 10.6% 19.5% 36.3% 2006 151 6.6% 9.9% 14.6% 31.1% NB: AAF Figures gathered by AAF members in 2006 are preliminary European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 10/18

Data summary in unprocessed maize (2000-2006) Total percentages of samples above proposed limits in DON, ZEA and FUM 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% DON ZEA FUMO B1+B2 10% 5% 0% 2000** 2001** 2002** 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total percentages Number of samples 2000** 2001** 2002** 2003 2004 2005 2006 DON 1672 0% 14% 12% 6% 5% 5% 25% ZEA 1471 3% 22% 16% 5% 6% 9% 23% FUMO B1+B2 * 1214 - - - 21% 34% 36% 31% NB: AAF Figures gathered by AAF members in 2006 are preliminary European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 11/18

Data results on maize starch More than 900 analysis done on DON, ZEA and FUMO B1+B2 since 2000 No starch samples above the proposed limit for final food Nearly all maize starch samples are below the limit of detection All starch derived products are below the limit of detection for the presence of Fusarium mycotoxins European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 12/18

Data results summary (1/2) Due to the maize wet milling process, there are no mycotoxins (below the limit of detection) in starch and starch derived products used as food ingredients Results on Fumonisins have been above the proposed limit in the past 4 years (consistently 30% above the proposed limit of 2000 ppb and a significant proportion above 5000 ppb) The 2006 crop results emphasize a higher seasonal variability of levels for DON and ZEA, much more than previously anticipated For the 2006 crop, more than 50% of the maize delivered to the starch factories is above the proposed limits for DON, ZEA and/or FUMO B1+B2 European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 13/18

Data results summary (2/2) Climatic conditions remain the primary factor for the development of Fusarium moulds and cause high level of variability and hence discrepancies in different regions High levels of Fumonisins are more frequent in Southern Europe Levels of DON and ZEA are usually higher in Northern Europe 2006 results show that these hazards cannot be easily managed by farmers and that more education, research and development on agriculture practices and plant breeding are needed European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 14/18

Conclusions As a consequence of the 2006 crop situation, all maize trade has already ceased for any delivery after 1 st July 2007 Supplies of maize hybrids (e.g. waxy maize) are contract grown and cannot be sourced elsewhere if part of the contract is outside the Fusarium mycotoxins limits After the entry into force of the proposed limits, should the 2006 crop situation be repeated, it will become very difficult for the food grade maize supply chain to guarantee sufficient volumes of European conventional maize for the food production Current provisions set in Regulation n 1881/2006 for Fusarium mycotoxins in maize are simply not achievable in 2007 European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 15/18

Economical framework of healthly conventional supplies of Maize The European Starch Industry encourages its maize suppliers to apply preventive measures as set in the Commission Guidelines The European Starch Industry needs sufficient European conventional maize supply every day for producing starch and starch derivatives Supplies are generally purchased several months in advance: few or no economic viable alternative options Anticipate any possible detrimental effects on the availability of food grade maize supplies for the starch industry and therefore starch products for the food industry Market fluidity needs to be ensured by the EU regulators European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 16/18

Proposed management options to the Standing Committee of the Food Chain and Animal Health Imperative postponement of the date of the entry into force of the levels on DON and ZEA in order to cover the situation of the 2006 crop which will be still processed after the 1 st July 2007 Further postponement of all provisions on Fusarium mycotoxins to leave time for further consideration and adoption of a stepwise approach Consider carefully the specific case of the starch industry due to the removal of Fusarium mycotoxins during processing and the production of starch-based food ingredients (Cf. Regulation 2174/2003): Specific higher maximum levels for maize intended for starch production or Recommendation levels for maize intended for starch production as HACCP based food safety management systems are in place European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 17/18

Link between Food and Feed levels The 2006 crop results will also have an impact on coproducts used as feed ingredients The Commission Recommendation on Feed should be implemented with proportionality as guidance values are not legal maximum limits and may lead to withdrawals only in exceptional cases Should the levels in maize be increased, there will be a need to reconsider some levels set in the Recommendation on several feed ingredients and for some species (i.e. cattle) European Commission Fusarium Toxins Forum (15-16 January 2007) 18/18