Investigator Initiated Study Proposal Form

Similar documents
PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

NIH NEW CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS AND FORMS-E

FDA SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA (SSED) CLINICAL SECTION CHECKLIST OFFICE OF DEVICE EVALUATION

Request for Applications Basic, Clinical and Population Science Pilot Awards

Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices

WATCHMAN PROTECT AF Study Rev. 6

Last Name First name Academic degrees. Professional titles and/or work position within your home institution

Type of Review Requested:

DARPA-BAA Frequently Asked Questions

Instrument for the assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Research Design & Protocol Development

European Federation of Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry (EFSPI)

RIGOR AND REPRODUCIBILITY IN RESEARCH GUIDANCE FOR REVIEWERS

Letter of Amendment # 3 to:

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Developing Drugs for Treatment Guidance for Industry

TITLE: Responsiveness of a Neuromuscular Recovery Scale for Spinal Cord Injury: Inpatient and Outpatient Rehabilitation

NCCIH Natural Products Technical Assistance Webinar: Exploratory Clinical Trials and Studies of Natural Products

Recent developments for combining evidence within evidence streams: bias-adjusted meta-analysis

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 21 October 2015

Application for Ethical Approval of Research Proposals

BARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research

Number: III-45 Effective Date: 1 February 2012 Revised Date: November 2016

This memo includes background of the project, the major themes within the comments, and specific issues that require further CSAC/HITAC action.

Reviewer No. 1 checklist for application of: inclusion of Nifurtimox + eflornithine in the WHO Essential Medicines List

INTERIM RESULTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2014 CSE/OMX:BAVA, OTC:BVNRY

The EU PIP - a step in Pediatric Drug Development. Thomas Severin Bonn,

Title 1 Descriptive title identifying the study design, population, interventions, and, if applicable, trial acronym

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT

Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Treating Autism Spectrum Disorders. Request for Applications

WARNING LETTER. Ref: 09-HFD

Helmut Schütz. Satellite Short Course Budapest, 5 October

BASE 24-HOUR URINE COLLECTION LITHOLINK CORE LAB

Active Launceston Endorsement Guidelines for applicants

July 22, The Smoking Cessation Initiative Description- A Multi-Prong Approach: 1. RNAO Smoking Cessation (SC) Coordinators

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

Author s response to reviews

Guide to Writing a Clinical Trial Protocol

Protocol Synopsis. Administrative information

U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland Distribution Unlimited

Using Statistical Principles to Implement FDA Guidance on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Diabetes Drugs

Department of OUTCOMES RESEARCH

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

Billing Code: P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [30Day-18-17AUZ]

Request for Proposals

Quality of Life of HIV-infected Patients Study

ANDA Submissions Refuse to Receive for Lack of Proper Justification of Impurity Limits Guidance for Industry

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

ANNEX A. STATEMENT OF WORK Task Authorization (TA) 22 FOR SUB CONTRACT WITH CIMVHR

TITLE: Long Term Outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing. CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Georgetown University Washington, DC

AP STATISTICS 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

Authors and Co-Authors,

Guidelines for Writing and Reviewing an Informed Consent Manuscript From the Editors of Clinical Research in Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates

Page 4. Line 7 and 8. Do these stats refer to children worldwide? Please clarify.

Texas Vendor Drug Program Specialty Drug List Process. February 2019

MC IRB Protocol No.:

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

1. Introduction Overview Organization of Executive Summary

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Statistical Analysis Plans

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

Side 1 af 5. Appendix: Comments on SPIRIT statement:

RESEARCH ETHICS ANIMAL PROTOCOL APPLICATION

SHORTENING TIMELINES AND IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT -Seamless drug development paradigms

Reflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular risk of medicinal products for the treatment of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases Draft

The ICHS1 Regulatory Testing Paradigm of Carcinogenicity in rats - Status Report

SHP Student Interns for Research and Scholarly Activities Application of Project Proposal Form

Instructions for Completing the UVMCC Clinical Research Protocol Submission Form UVMCC CLINICAL RESEARCH PROTOCOL SUBMISSION FORM

IRB PROPOSAL GRADING RUBRIC

Yale Environmental Health & Safety Update Form for Request to Use Infectious Agents Status of Protocol

The Research Registryâ Guidebook

Controlled Trials. Spyros Kitsiou, PhD

GSK Q&A For Patient Advocacy Groups: 04 October 2013 For reactive use in response to enquiries from patient groups only

Appendix A: Literature search strategy

Standards for the reporting of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews

Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings

Common Statistical Issues in Biomedical Research

Diagnostics Assessment Report (DAR) - Comments

Workshop # 3 : Application of Bayesian Statistics in early development studies

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

CAPE PENINSULA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND WELLNESS SCIENCES RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

Title: Meta-analysis of Individual patient Data (IPD) of Patients with INH (mono or poly-drug) Resistant Tuberculosis.

Grant application form - Project v A

Table of Contents. Preface to the third edition xiii. Preface to the second edition xv. Preface to the fi rst edition xvii. List of abbreviations xix

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.

NATIONAL AIDS COORDINATING AGENCY Botswana National HIV/AIDS Prevention Support Project (BNAPS)

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE & INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE COMMUNITY BENEFIT FY 2016 ADULT DIABETES GRANT GUIDELINES

Issues regarding non-inferiority within the anti-bacterials area. Jon Armstrong, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

Cohort A. Number of patients

Overview Internal review

Analysis for [Intervention] ([Jurisdiction] Feasibility Study)

INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE ON DRUG DEVELOPMENT FOR TYPE 1 SMA

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) POINTS TO CONSIDER ON MISSING DATA

Data and Statistics 101: Key Concepts in the Collection, Analysis, and Application of Child Welfare Data

OHTAC Recommendation: Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertension. Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee

Lecture 2. Key Concepts in Clinical Research

UMbRELLA interim report Preparatory work

Double Fortification of Salt: Critical analysis and consensus building towards the development of guidance for countries

Propensity Score Methods for Estimating Causality in the Absence of Random Assignment: Applications for Child Care Policy Research

Transcription:

Please submit completed form to IISReview@KCI1.com Date Submitted Name & Title Institution Address Phone Number Email Address Principal Investigator / Institution YES NO Multi Center Study Acelity Product(s) to be studied If yes, please provide sub- site information below. Add more sites as needed. Proposal Control, if any. If standard of care is used for control, describe what is your standard of care? Type of Study Clinical Pre- Clinical (Species: ) Study Design Meta Analysis of Randomized Trials Prospective with randomization to treatment or control Prospective treatment cohort compared with historical control Prospective treatment cohort with descriptive results only (comparison with literature results for control, or no comparison at all) Retrospective treatment cohort compared to retrospective control cohort Retrospective treatment cohort: with descriptive results only (comparisons to literature results for control, or not comparison at all) Other (please describe) For applicable animal studies, please include description of internal controls. Study Title Study Objectives 1 of 6

Background / Rationale Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint(s) Safety Data to be Collected Number of Subjects in the Study Statistical Justification for Number of Subjects Statistical Analysis Plan Will Health Economics or Patient Report Outcomes (PROs) data be collected? Do you have access to an IRB/Ethics or IACUC? Do you have any ongoing studies that will compete for patient enrollment? Do you have adequate space for secure storage of study product? Do you have a dedicated study Coordinator or other personnel to collect study data? Please list proposed inclusion and exclusion criteria. For preclinical studies, please include the specific model. If yes, please describe the instruments to be used, the timing of the assessments, and the planned analyses. YES NO If yes, please describe. If yes, please describe. If yes, please identify total proposed time allocated to study related activities. 2 of 6

Describe your experience with using the product (or for pre- clinical studies, the proposed pre- clinical model). Do you have experience with the proposed methods and study design? Please describe. Describe any support that is required for this study. Funding: Acelity Support Requested (If requesting funding, please attach a detailed budget) Are you working with or seeking support from any other sources for this research? If yes, please specify. Product: (If requesting product, please list the device and number of units needed) Estimated Time to Complete Study and Submit Manuscript for Publication (Please replace x values with your estimates, to the nearest month) A Time from IIS Committee Approval to Contract Approval (2 months minimum): 2 months B Time from IIS Committee Approval to Draft Protocol To Acelity: x months C Acelity Review of protocol and including discussion with investigator. 1 month D Time from receipt of Acelity reviewed protocol to First Subject enrolled (include IRB approval time and any other logistic requirements at institution) x months E Total time from First Subject enrolled to last subject treated x months F Total follow- up time per subject x months G Total time to clean/lock data and analyze x months H Total time from analysis completion to final report draft x months I Acelity review of final report 1 month J Review of Acelity comments, finalize publication, submit x months Total Time (Months) from Proposal Approval to Submitting the Publication to the Journal (add A J) Detailed Publication Plan x months Please specify targeted journals for submission of abstracts, poster and manuscript. Also, please specify any meetings where you intend to present resulting data. 3 of 6

Contracts Person(s) Statistician Contact(s) Coordinator Contact(s) Additional Information Please attach CVs for the following personnel: Primary investigator Attached Not attached (please explain) CVs Statistician Attached Not attached (please explain) 4 of 6

APPENDIX NOTE: IIS proposals are reviewed by an internal Acelity Committee. Committee meetings are usually scheduled on the first week of each month, although on rare occasions these meetings may be postponed until the following month. In order to give the IIS Committee sufficient time to evaluate proposals, and in some cases ask preliminary clarifying questions, grant requests and corresponding documents must be submitted by the 15 th of the month to be considered at the following month s meeting. Applicants are usually contacted within 3 weeks following the meeting on the committee, either with a decision regarding support or with further follow- up questions. Instructions for Completing the Primary/Secondary Endpoint: Please clearly describe the primary endpoint, which is a variable measured on each subject. Include timing as applicable. Number of subjects in the Study: Please include the total number of subjects overall, and for each cohort individually. Example: 100 total subjects (50 in the Product group, and 50 in the control group). Statistical justification for number of subjects: 1. If your trial has any statistical hypothesis testing, or employs randomization, or has more than one treatment group, or has a control group, then the sample size must be justified by providing a. the power to achieve statistical significance for the primary endpoint. b. the planned type 1 error rate, and whether this error rate is 1- sided or 2- sided; c. the anticipated effect in each treatment group, along with any variability assumptions required to determine the sample size (please also provide a justification for these assumptions, eg, if you assume that your population will have a complication rate of 20%, please justify how you selected 20%) d. the statistical hypothesis test that will be used to assess the primary endpoint; e. an explanation of how missing data will be treated in the analysis; and f. the name and version of the statistical software you used to compute your sample size, or a copy of the reference used; please provide a copy of the output from the commercial software if possible. 2. If your trial is based on feasibility, and no statistical hypothesis tests are planned, please state this. Note that results from trials based on feasibility are considered less scientifically rigorous than comparative trials, and therefore are less likely to be accepted by the committee. If any statistical hypothesis testing is planned, please provide the power the test and please provide the information required in #1. Example: We assume that subjects in the standard of care group will have a complication rate of xx%, while subjects in the Product group will have a complication rate of yy%. We base these assumptions on (literature references). Under these assumptions, nnn subjects per group will provide 80% power to detect a difference between control and Product, using the Chi- square test (without continuity correction) at 2- sided alpha=5%. Statistical Analysis Plan: Please describe your planned statistical analysis in detail, including (at a minimum), the answers to the following questions, if you plan to perform statistical testing: 1. What statistical test will be used to analyze the primary endpoint? Secondary endpoints? 2. Will you adjust for multiplicity across different endpoints or time points? How will overall type 1 error be maintained? 5 of 6

3. How will you handle drop- outs in the analysis of your primary endpoint? Are there any specific stopping rules for individual subjects? If there are specific stopping rules, how will these subjects be handled in the analysis? 4. If you are performing a time- to- event analysis, please clearly describe how subjects without events will be censored. 5. Do you have any interim analyses planned? (if yes, answer 5a- 5d) a. Is it possible to stop the trial at the interim analysis due to achievement of efficacy goals? If yes, what is the p- value criterion for this decision? b. Is it possible to stop the trial at the interim analysis due to futility? If yes, what statistical criteria are used to determine whether to stop? Are these statistical futility criteria binding, that is, is the study required to be stopped if the statistical futility are met? c. Do you plan to re- assess sample size at the interim analysis? If so, what statistical criteria will be used (include references if applicable)? d. What statistical methodology have you used to determine interim analysis rules (so that type 1 error is preserved)? 6. If you plan to use historical control, what is the source of the historical control? How will you select subjects from this source in a non- biased way so that they can serve as an appropriate control (matching, propensity scoring, etc)? 6 of 6