Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Robert F. Taylor, MD Aurora Health Care

Similar documents
Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Barbara Burtness, MD Yale University

Use of Single-Arm Cohorts/Trials to Demonstrate Clinical Benefit for Breakthrough Therapies. Eric H. Rubin, MD Merck Research Laboratories

Update on the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy in head and neck cancer and MSI in solid tumors

Merck ASCO 2015 Investor Briefing

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Cancer William N. William Jr.

Conversations in Oncology. November Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China

Disclosures. Immunotherapyin Head & NeckCancer. Actual landscape of systemic treatment in HNSCC. Head andneckcanceris an immunogeneic tumor

CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PEMBROLIZUMAB IN MSI-H CANCERS

Out of 129 patients with NSCLC treated with Nivolumab in a phase I trial, the OS rate at 5-y was about 16 %, clearly higher than historical rates.

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Aurelio B. Castrellon Medical Oncology Memorial Healthcare System

Post-ASCO Immunotherapy Highlights (Part 2): Biomarkers for Immunotherapy

Predictive Biomarkers for Pembrolizumab. Eric H. Rubin, M.D.

Indication for- and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy Kidney- and bladder cancer: Immunotherapy

Cancer Immunotherapy Patient Forum. for the Treatment of Melanoma, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers - November 7, 2015

NSCLC: immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. Paolo Bironzo Oncologia Polmonare AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano (To)

1 st Appraisal Committee meeting Background & Clinical Effectiveness Gillian Ells & Malcolm Oswald 24/11/2016

Il ruolo di PD-L1 (42%) tra la prima e la seconda linea di trattamento

New Paradigms for Treatment of. Erminia Massarelli, MD, PHD, MS Clinical Associate Professor

Is There a Future for Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer?

Patient Selection: The Search for Immunotherapy Biomarkers

Head and Neck Cancer Update Sandro V Porceddu

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Melanoma. Marlana Orloff, MD Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Presentation Number: LBA18_PR. Lecture Time: 09:15-09:27. Speakers: Heinz-Josef J. Lenz (Los Angeles, US) Background

News from ASCO. Niven Mehra, Medical Oncologist. Radboud UMC Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital

Evan J. Lipson, M.D.

Updates in Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma

II sessione. Immunoterapia oltre la prima linea. Alessandro Tuzi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese

Immunotherapy for NSCLC: Current State of the Art and Future Directions. H. Jack West, MD Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, Washington, United States

Lung Cancer Immunotherapy

Immunotherapies for Advanced NSCLC: Current State of the Field. H. Jack West Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, Washington

Keytruda. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) Description

PLENARY SESSION 1: CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN IN AN ERA OF HORIZONTAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT Industry Perspective

INMUNOTERAPIA: NUEVO PARADIGMA EN LOS TUMORES DE CABEZA Y CUELLO. Dra. Lara Iglesias H.U.12 Octubre

Recent Advances & Ongoing Challenges in Head & Neck Cancers

The Rationale for Immunotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced BC

Immunotherapy in the clinic. Lung Cancer. Marga Majem 20 octubre 2017

Monthly Oncology Tumor Boards: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Individualized Patient Care Lung Cancer: Advanced Disease March 8, 2016

Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: First-line Treatment should be Chemotherapy PRO. Gini Fleming GCIG June 1, 2017

Weitere Kombinationspartner der Immunotherapie

Immunotherapy for dmmr metastatic colorectal cancer. Prof.dr. Kees Punt Dept. Medical Oncology AUMC

CURRENT STANDARD OF CARE IN NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER

May 31, NCCN Guidelines: T-Cell Lymphomas

Head and Neck Cancer:

Development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as a form of cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review of registration trials and future considerations

Immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

and neck cancers, 2018

IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS

Keytruda. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) Description

Recent Advances in Lung Cancer: Updates from ASCO Updates from ESMO, AACR and ASCO

Practice changing studies in lung cancer 2017

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC

Policy. Medical Policy Manual Approved Revised: Do Not Implement Until 3/2/19. Nivolumab (Intravenous)

A Giant Leap in the Treatment Options for Advanced Bladder Cancer

Policy. Medical Policy Manual Approved Revised: Do Not Implement until 6/30/2019. Nivolumab

Biomarkers in Imunotherapy: RNA Signatures as predictive biomarker

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Combination Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

State of the Art: Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Raul Giglio

Immune Therapy in Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer (ITICC) Hal Hirte Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Group

Prostate cancer Management of metastatic castration sensitive cancer

Principles and Application of Immunotherapy for Cancer: Advanced NSCLC

Keytruda. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) Description

Immunotherapeutic Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Carla van Herpen Medical Oncologist Immunotherapyin Head & NeckCancer

Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Emerging immune biomarkers. Athanasios Kotsakis MD, PhD Ast. Professor of Medical Oncology School of Medicine, University of Crete

Largos Supervivientes, Tenemos datos?

III Sessione I risultati clinici

Options for first-line cisplatin-eligible patients

Recent Therapeutic Advances for Thoracic Malignancies

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Nivolumab: esperienze italiane nel carcinoma polmonare avanzato

Urothelial Cancers- New Strategies. Sandy Srinivas.MD Stanford University

Challenges in Distinguishing Clinical Signals to Support Development Decisions: Case Studies

The Immunotherapy of Oncology

The PARADIGM Study: A Phase III Study Comparing Sequential Therapy (ST) to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Immunotherapy of Melanoma Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD

CENTENE PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS DRUG REVIEW 3Q17 April May

Current Issues in Checkpoint Immunotherapy for NSCLC: A Perspective from January 2018

Checkpoint Inibitors for Bladder Cancer

Role of the Pathologist in Guiding Immuno-oncological Therapies. Scott Rodig MD, PhD

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Standard and Novel Targets.

Genomics and Genetics in BC: Precise selection for chemotherapy and Immunotherapy. Raanan Berger MD PhD Sheba Medical Center, Israel

Breast Cancer Immunotherapy. Leisha A. Emens, MD PhD Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

New Agents for Head and Neck Cancer. Ezra Cohen, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago Chicago, IL

La revolución de la inmunoterapia: dónde la posicionamos? Javier Puente, MD, PhD

ESMO 2017, Madrid, Spain Dr. Loredana Vecchione Charite Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin HIGHLIGHTS ON CANCERS OF THE UPPER GI TRACT

Lung cancer PD-L1 testing clinical impact

Immunotherapy for Upper GI Cancers

ICLIO National Conference

Atezolizumab Is a Humanized Anti-PDL1 Antibody That Inhibits the Binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 and B7.1

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Immunotherapy, an exciting era!!

We re Reaching Ludicrous Speed: New Immunotherapy Oncology Medications

MEETING SUMMARY ESMO 2018, Munich, Germany. Dr. Jenny Seligmann University of Leeds, UK HIGHLIGHTS ON COLORECTAL CANCER

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Webinar. Thursday, September 13, p.m. EDT

Transcription:

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers Robert F. Taylor, MD Aurora Health Care

Disclosures No relevant financial relationships to disclose I will be discussing non-fda approved indications during my presentation.

IO Agents approved and in development for HNC 1. Pembrolizumab IgG4 Humanized High Affinity for PD-1 (K D ~ 29 pm) Approved for Melanoma, NSCLC, HNC 2. Nivolumab IgG4 Fully human High Affinity for PD-1 (K D ~ 2.6 nm) Approved for Melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, HNC 4. Other PD-1/PD-L1 agents in development: PD-L1 agents Atezolizumab (bladder, NSCLC approval), Avelumab PD-1 agents: R2810, PRD001, Tesaro 3. Durvalumab IgG1 Humanized High Affinity for PD- L1 (K D ~ 29 pm) In Development for Head and Neck Cancer, Lung Cancer, others 5. CTLA-4 agents: Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab

HNSCC Cohorts of Nonrandomized, Phase 1b, Multi-cohort KEYNOTE-012 Trial Patients R/M HNSCC Measurable disease (RECIST v1.1) ECOG PS 0-1 PD-L1+ (initial cohort) PD-L1+ or PD-L1- (expansion cohort) Initial Cohort Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W N = 60 Expansion Cohort Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W N = 132 Continue until: 24 months of treatment PD Intolerable toxicity Combined analyses of Initial and Expansion cohorts Response assessment: Every 8 weeks Primary end points: ORR (RECIST v1.1, central imaging vendor), safety Secondary end points: ORR (investigator), PFS, OS, response duration, ORR in HPV+ patients Additional cohorts included bladder cancer, TN breast cancer, and gastric cancer. Treatment beyond progression was allowed. Initial cohort only.

Change From Baseline in Sum of Longest Diameter of Target Lesion, % Tumor Shrinkage (KeyNote 12) 100 80 60 40 20 ~50% experienced a decrease in target lesions HPV- HPV+ Unknown OP 20% increase 0-20 -40 30% decrease -60-80 -100 Analysis includes patients with measurable disease at baseline who received 1 pembrolizumab dose and had 1 post-baseline tumor assessment (n = 106) Unconfirmed and confirmed RECIST v 1.1 responses by site radiology review *2 oropharynx cancer patient are HPV unknown. Cancers outside the oropharynx are considered HPV negative by convention Data cutoff date: March 23, 2015. OP = oropharyngeal primary Seiwert TY Lancet Oncol 2016 Response Rate 18%, However RESPONSE is a poor outcome measure 5

Seiwert TY Lancet Oncol 2016 Durability (KeyNote 12)

Seiwert TY Lancet Oncol 2016 Most responses are early, few delayed, BUT virtually no Pseudoprogression!

Seiwert TY Lancet Oncol 2016 Major Impact on Overall Survival

Major Impact on Overall Survival KN55: N=171 RR = 16% mos = 8 months DOR: 8 months Bauml*/Seiwert* et al JCO 2017 in Press Seiwert TY Lancet Oncol 2016

Presented by:

Patient Response (central review) Baseline Cycle 4-28.3% Cycle 8-56.1% Wk 8 SD Wk 16 PR Images from: Tanguy Seiwert, MD

Patient Response (central review) Baseline Cycle 4-28.3% Cycle 8-56.1% Wk 8 SD Wk 16 PR Presented by: Tanguy Seiwert

Phase 3 CheckMate 141 Study Design Nivolumab in R/M SCCHN After Platinum Therapy Randomized, global, phase 3 trial of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab vs investigator s choice in patients with R/M SCCHN Key Eligibility Criteria R/M SCCHN of the oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx Progression on or within 6 months of last dose of platinum-based therapy Irrespective of no. of prior lines of therapy Documentation of p16 to determine HPV status (oropharyngeal) Regardless of PD-L1 status a R 2:1 Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W Investigator s Choice Methotrexate 40 mg/m² IV weekly Docetaxel 30 mg/m² IV weekly Cetuximab 400 mg/m² IV once, then 250 mg/m² weekly Primary endpoint OS Other endpoints PFS ORR Safety DOR Biomarkers Quality of life Stratification factor Prior cetuximab treatment DOR = duration of response; IV = intravenous; ORR = objective response rate; PFS = progression-free survival; Q2W = once every 2 weeks; R = randomized. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02105636. a Tissue required for testing Ferris/Gillison NEJM 2016

Overall Survival (% of patients) Overall Survival Nivolumab in R/M SCCHN After Platinum Therapy 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Median OS, mo (95% CI) Nivolumab (n = 240) 7.5 (5.5, 9.1) Investigator s Choice (n = 121) 5.1 (4.0, 6.0) HR (97.73% CI) 0.70 (0.51, 0.96) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 Months No. at Risk Nivolumab 240 167 109 52 24 7 0 Investigator s 121 87 42 17 5 1 0 Choice Response Rate only 13%, but major impact on Survival Ferris/Gillison NEJM 2016 1-year OS rate (95% CI) 36.0% (28.5, 43.4) 16.6% (8.6, 26.8) P-value 0.0101

Overall Survival (% of patients) Overall Survival (% of patients) Overall Survival by p16 Status Nivolumab in R/M SCCHN After Platinum Therapy 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 p16-positive HR (95% CI) 0.56 (0.32, 0.99) Nivolumab (n = 63) 10 Investigator s Choice (n = 29) 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 No. at Risk Months Nivo 63 49 35 18 10 3 0 Inv 29 20 11 4 1 0 0 Choice 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 p16-negative Investigator s Choice (n = 36) HR (95% CI) 0.73 (0.42, 1.25) Nivolumab (n = 50) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 Months 50 32 25 12 6 1 36 26 13 7 3 1 0 0 Ferris/Gillison NEJM 2016

KEYNOTE 40: 2 nd Line PIII Randomized, phase III trial of Pembrolizumab vs. Dealer s choice in R/M HNSCC following failure of platinum therapy N=466 Key Eligibility Criteria Recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx) Failure of prior platinum therapy ECOG PS 0 1 No active CNS metastases No prior exposure to PD-1 pathway inhibitors R Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q3w Methotrexate, or Docetaxel, or Cetuximab Start Date: November 2014 Estimated Study Completion Date: ~March 2017 Primary Outcome Measure: OS and PFS* in all patients OS and PFS* in strong PD-L1+ patients

Inflamed tumor express PD-L1 PD-L1 Expression in HNC PD-L1 negative PD-L1 positive (IC b ) PD-L1 positive (TC b ) PD-L1 positive (IC b and TC b ) PD-L1 expressing cells b PD-L1 expression cutoff All (n=135) HPV(+) (n=49) HPV(-) (n=86) p-value* (HPV+ vs HPV-) Tumor Cells (TC) Immune Cells (IC) 1% 21.5 26.5 18.6 5% 11.9 16.3 9.3 0.27 1% 69.6 71.4 68.6 5% 32.6 38.8 29.1 0.26 Immune and/or Tumor Cells PD-L1 prevalence (TC b & IC b ) by IHC was similar in HPV(+) vs HPV(-) tumors. SP142 PD-L1 IHC H. Koeppen, Y. Xiao, M. Kowanetz (Genentech) 1% 72.6 73.5 72.1 5% 40.0 49.0 34.9 0.14 * Fisher s exact test a PD-L1 assessed by proprietary Genentech/Roche IHC assay b IC tumor infiltrating immune cells; TC tumor cells

Overall Survival (% of patients) Overall Survival (% of patients) CM141: OS by PD-L1 Expression TPS 1% cutpoint 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PD-L1 1% PD-L1 < 1% HR (95% CI) 0.55 (0.36, 0.83) Investigator s Choice (n = 61) Nivolumab (n = 88) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 No. at Risk Months 88 67 44 18 6 0 Nivo Inv Choice 61 42 20 6 2 0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 HR (95% CI) 0.89 (0.54, 1.45) Nivolumab (n = 73) 10 Investigator s Choice (n = 38) 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 Months 73 52 33 17 8 3 0 38 29 14 6 2 0 0 Similar data with Pembrolizumab and Durvalumab, PENDING: measure TUMOR (TPS), or TUMOR + IMMUNE CELLS (CPS)?

PD-L1 Staining: Think Outside the Tumor? PD-L1 staining is not limited to tumor, though the approved assays only look there In both KEYNOTE studies as well as CHECKMATE 141, inclusion of tumor associated PD-L1+ immune cells improves diagnostic performance Ferris et al AACR 2017

Biomarkers in Head and Neck Cancer Current FDA approval of pembrolizumab and nivolumab is NOT contingent upon PD-L1 IHC In KN012 and KN055 response rates were not significantly different on the basis of tumor PD-L1 staining IN CM141 most benefit was seen in PD-L1 positive tumors

PD-L1 isn t Everything! Peters et al AACR 2017

Various Biomarkers in HNC Haddad et al ASCO 2017

Combined GEP/ML Haddad et al ASCO 2017

KEYNOTE 48: 1 st Line - PIII Randomized, phase III trial in 1 st line R/M HNSCC: N=825 Key Eligibility Criteria Recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, or nasopharynx) No prior systemic therapy in recurrent/metastatic setting ECOG PS 0 1 Ability to provide tissue for PD-L1 analysis No active CNS metastases No prior exposure to PD-1 pathway inhibitors R Pembrolizumab* 200 mg IV q3w Pembrolizumab* + Pt + 5-FU EXTREME: Cetuximab + Pt + 5-FU Start Date: March 2015 *20%, 10%, 1% successive cut points Composite Score (CPS) Primary Outcome Measure: PFS*, OS, ( PD-L1+ subgroup*) Secondary Outcome Measures: PFS, ORR

Case #1 57 yo male with T4N2cM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, P16 negative. Previous heavy smoker but currently not smoking or drinking. Underwent concurrent chemo/radiation with Cisplatin and 7000 cgy IMRT. Re assessed following completion of chemo/rt with CT scan and had residual adenopathy at 8 weeks. Subsequent neck dissection showed residual disease in 1 node. All others negative Restaging 6 months later demonstrated multiple 1 cm nodules in both lungs. Biopsy: squamous cell carcinoma, P16 negative. Treated with EXTREME regimen with progressive disease. Subsequently started on Pembrolizumab with 50% reduction in all nodules. Continues to receive treatment.

Case #2 74 yo Laotian woman with hx of tongue pain for several months. No regular medical care. Ultimately saw a dentist who felt a mass in her tongue and possible nodes in neck. Referred to ENT. Biopsy of tongue base showed squamous cell carcinoma, P16 positive. PET scan showed mass at base of tongue and bilateral neck nodes. Pt offered surgery but refused. Was treated with definitive chemo/rt with resolution of pain and regression of nodes. She refused additional treatment. Re-assessment 6 months later demonstrated cervical adenopathy but no distant mets. She agreed to neck dissection at that time. Had 3/17 positive nodes for P16 positive squamous cell carcinoma Refused additional chemotherapy. Developed additional contralateral nodal disease 3 months later which was painful. Started on Nivolumab at that time. Remains in stable PR

Conclusions for Head and Neck Cancer 1. Chemotherapy offers short survival with many side effects 2. PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab are approved in second line recurrent / metastatic HNSCC: Oral cavity Oropharynx Larynx Hypopharynx 3. Most patients have fewer side effects on PD-1 Abs than on chemotherapy 4. Clinical trials are underway to improve immunotherapy response rates

New Approvals Affecting Various Disease States On May 23, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for adult and pediatric patients with the following: Unresectable or metastatic, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dmmr) solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options OR MSI-H or dmmr colorectal cancer that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.