SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Similar documents
Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Session 47.

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

Amendment to CRL report (D08/FSQ/CVH/GS/D(2007) 11114) on the dossier EFSA-Q (Panaferd-AX )

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

Safety and efficacy of Panaferd-AX (red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens) as feed additive for salmon and trout 1

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

L 243/10 Official Journal of the European Union

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Withdrawal period for Coxidin for chickens and turkeys for fattening and re-examination of the provisional Maximum Residue Limit 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

(FAD ; CRL/170025)

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of propenylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 17) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

Official Journal of the European Union

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

KBW (AJ 14971) (FAD ; CRL/120042)

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Zn (Zinc chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008

Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Brilliant Blue FCF (E133) as a feed additive for cats and dogs 1

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 11 July 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Transcription:

SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of a red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (Panaferd-AX) as feed additive for salmon and trout 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy SUMMARY Following a request from the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on a modification to the terms of authorisation of a red carotenoidrich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (Panaferd-AX) as feed additive for salmon and trout. The red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens is authorised as a sensory additive for use in salmon and trout with a maximum content of 100 mg, expressed as the sum of astaxanthin, adonirubin and canthaxanthin per kg complete feed. The current carotenoid composition of the product is specified as 3 5 g canthaxanthin, 10 15 g adonirubin and 20 23 g astaxanthin/kg. The applicant proposes to modify the ranges of canthaxanthin to 1 5 g, and that of adonirubin to 7 15 g/kg product, while maintaining the astaxanthin range. The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concludes that adjusting the ranges for canthaxanthin and adonirubin to the values proposed by the applicant would not affect safety and efficacy of the product, considering that there are no changes in (i) the manufacturing of the product compared to the former application, and (ii) the conditions of use already authorised. The applicant provided data of 70 batches to substantiate his proposal. Fourteen batches did not meet the specification for astaxanthin (below 20 g/kg product). The content of canthaxanthin and adonirubin of the remaining batches did not support the ranges as proposed by the applicant. However, reviewing the carotenoid composition, compliance with ranges of 2 5 g canthaxanthin/kg and 9 15 g adonirubin/kg product has been obtained. The FEEDAP Panel noted that any extension of the range of the specified carotenoid contents would increase the uncertainties of the feed manufacturer when using the product. 1 On request from the European Commission, Question No EFSA-Q-2009-00629, adopted on 9 December 2009. 2 Panel members: Gabriele Aquilina, Georges Bories, Paul Brantom, Francesca Caloni, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Joop de Knecht, Noël Albert Dierick, Mikolaj Antoni Gralak, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Nils-Gunnar Ilbäck, Reinhard Kroker, Lubomir Leng, Sven Lindgren, Anne-Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Miklós Mézes, Derek Renshaw and Maria Saarela. Correspondence: FEEDAP@efsa.europa.eu 3 Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Colouring agents and Vitamins (subgroup on Panaferd-AX) for the preparation of this opinion. Suggested citation: EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of a red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (Panaferd-AX) as feed additive for salmon and trout.. [8 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1428. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu European Food Safety Authority, 2010 1

KEY WORDS sensory additive, Panaferd-AX, Paracoccus carotinifaciens, carotenoid, astaxanthin, canthaxanthin, adonirubin, salmonids 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents... 3 Background... 4 Terms of reference... 4 Assessment... 7 1. Introduction... 7 2. Characterisation of the product... 7 2.1. Red carotenoids in the additive... 7 3. Safety and efficacy... 8 Conclusions... 8 Documentation provided to EFSA... 8 References... 8 3

BACKGROUND Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 4 establishes rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition. In particular, Article 13(3) of that Regulation lays down that if the holder of an authorisation proposes changing the terms of the authorisation by submitting an application to the Commission, accompanied by the relevant data supporting the request for the change, the Authority shall transmit its opinion on the proposal to the Commission and the Member States. The European Commission received a proposal from the company Nippon Oil Corporation 5 for a modification of some of the terms of the current authorisation of the additive 2a(ii)167, red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (Commission Regulation (EC) No 721/2008). 6 According to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the Commission forwarded the application to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as an application under Article 13(3) (modification of an existing authorisation of a feed additive). EFSA received directly from the applicant the technical dossier in support of this application. 7 According to Article 8 of that Regulation, EFSA, after verifying the particulars and documents submitted by the applicant, shall undertake an assessment in order to determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. The particulars and documents in support of the application were considered valid by EFSA as of 6 October 2009. The additive red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (Panaferd-AX) consists of sterilised dried cells of Paracoccus carotinifaciens. The product is authorised at Community level for salmon and trout until 15 August 2018. 5 EFSA issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of Panaferd-AX for salmon and trout (EFSA, 2007). TERMS OF REFERENCE According to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, EFSA shall determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. EFSA shall deliver an opinion on the safety for the target animal(s), consumer, user and the environment and the efficacy of the product consisting of sterilised dried cells of the red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (NITE SD 00017) (Panaferd-AX) when used under the conditions described in Table 1. 4 OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p.29 5 Nippon Oil Corporation. Nippon Oil (UK) Plc. 15, Eldon St., London EC2M 7LD, UK 6 OJ L 198, 26.7.2008, p.23 7 EFSA Dossier reference: FAD-2009-0018 4

Table 1: Description and conditions of use of the additive as proposed by the applicant Additive Registration number/ec No/No Category(-ies) of additive Functional group(s) of additive Red carotenoid-rich Paracoccus carotinifaciens 2a(ii)167 Sensory additives. [A II]; COLOURANTS; SUBSTANCES WHICH WHEN FED TO ANIMALS ADD COLOURS TO FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN Composition, description Preparation of dried killed cells of Paracoccus carotinifaciens (NITE SD 00017) Description Chemical formula Purity criteria Astaxanthin (C40H52O4, 20 23 g/kg CAS: 472-61-7) astaxanthin Adonirubin (C40H52O3, 7 15 g/kg -3-Hydroxy-β,β-carotene- adonirubin 4,4'-dione, CAS: 511-1 5 g/kg 23801) 8 canthaxanthin Canthaxanthin (C40H52O2, CAS: 514-78-3) Method of analysis Normal phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled to UV/visible detection for determination of astaxanthin, adonirubin and canthaxanthin in feedingstuffs and fish tissue. Trade name Name of the holder of authorisation Conditions of use Species or category of animal Maximum Age Minimum content Maximum content Withdrawal period mg/kg of complete feedingstuffs Salmon, trout - - 100 - Other provisions and additional requirements for the labelling Specific conditions or restrictions for use Specific conditions or restrictions for handling Post-market monitoring Specific conditions for use in complementary feedingstuffs 1. The maximum content is expressed as the sum of astaxanthin, adonirubin and canthaxanthin. 2. Use permitted from the age of 6 months onwards or weight of 50 g. 3. The mixture of the additive with astaxanthin or canthaxanthin is allowed provided that the total concentration of the sum of astaxanthin,adonirubin and canthaxanthin from other sources does not exceed 100 mg/kg in complete feedingstuff. 8 The FEEDAP Panel notes that the CAS number of Adonirubin is 4418-72-8 5

Marker residue The sum of adonirubin and canthaxanthin/kg muscle (wet tissue) Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) Species or category of animal Target tissue(s) or food products Maximum content in tissues Salmon / trout Muscle 10 / 8 6

ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction The product (Panaferd-AX) is a feed additive (sensory; colourant which, when fed to animals, add colours to food of animal origin) consisting of dried sterilised cells of a red carotenoid-rich bacterium (Paracoccus carotinifaciens NITE SD 00017). Its use in salmon and trout is authorised in the EU with a maximum content of 100 mg, expressed as the sum of astaxanthin, adonirubin and canthaxanthin, per kg complete feed (Commission Regulation (EC) No 721/2008) 9. The applicant proposed a modification of the terms of the authorisation, to widen the ranges for adonirubin (from 10 15 to 7 15 g/kg) and canthaxanthin (from 3 5 to 1 5 g/kg), while maintaining the astaxanthin specification (20 23 g/kg product). The FEEDAP Panel assessed the safety and efficacy of Panaferd-AX in a previous opinion (EFSA, 2007) and considers that the proposed modification would not affect the previous assessment. Therefore, the current opinion focuses only on the characterisation of the product. 2. Characterisation of the product 2.1. Red carotenoids in the additive The applicant provided data of 70 Panaferd-AX batches (45 from one plant and 25 from another plant, manufactured between 2003 and 2009) on the content of astaxanthin, adonirubin and canthaxanthin. 10 The ranges were for astaxanthin 16.2 to 24.0 g/kg, for canthaxanthin 1.6 to 6.1 g/kg, and for adonirubin 7.6 to 16.6 g/kg product. 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 CANTHAXANTHIN 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.6 4.1 4.6 5.1 g/kg product Among the 70 batches, 14 did not meet the specification for astaxanthin (20 23 g/kg) being below 20 g astaxanthin/kg product; therefore they will not be further considered. The remaining 56 batches showed mean values ± SD for canthaxanthin of 3.3 ± 0.9, for adonirubin of 11.2 ± 1.8, and for astaxanthin of 21.8 ± 0.8 g/kg. The frequency distribution (classes with 0.5 g intervals) of the individual values is given in Figures 1 and 2 for canthaxanthin and adonirubin, respectively. Figure 1. Frequency distribution (classes with 0.5 g/kg intervals) of the canthaxanthin content of 56 batches of Panaferd-AX Figure 1 shows only one batch in the range of 1.2 1.6 g canthaxanthin/kg product. The frequency distribution does not support the proposal of the applicant to widen the specification to 1 5 g canthaxanthin/kg product, allowing only a modification from the existing range of 3 5 to 2 5 g/kg. 9 OJ L 198, 26.7.2008, p.23 10 Technical Dossier, Section II 7

10 8 6 4 2 0 ADONIRUBIN g/kg product Figure 2. Frequency distribution (classes with 0.5 g/kg intervals) of the adonirubin content of 56 batches of Panaferd-AX Figure 2 shows only one batch in the range of 7.2 7.6 g adonirubin/kg product. Although the data favours a widening of the specification, the frequency distribution does not support the proposal of the applicant to extend the specification to 7 15 g/kg. However, maintaining the existing minimum content of 10 g/kg would prevent about 20 % of the batches to be marketed. A modified range of 9 15 g adonirubin/kg product is proposed. The authorised range for astaxanthin (20 23 g/kg) is confirmed by the frequency distribution of the astaxanthin content in Panaferd-AX for the 56 batches examined. 3. Safety and efficacy Safety for target species, consumer, user and environment, as well as the efficacy of the product would not be affected by the proposed modification to the terms of authorisation, considering that there are no changes in (i) the manufacturing of the product compared to the former application, and (ii) the conditions of use as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 721/2008. CONCLUSIONS A modification of the terms of authorisation of the red carotenoid-rich bacterium (Paracoccus carotinifaciens), consisting of an extension of the range of canthaxanthin and adonirubin contents (by lowering the lower bound), while maintaining that of astaxanthin, would not affect safety and efficacy of the product. The data provided by the applicant does not support the proposed modifications. However, reviewing the carotenoid composition of 56 batches indicates compliance with ranges of 2 5 g canthaxanthin/kg and 9 15 g adonirubin/kg product. REMARKS Any extension of the range of the specified carotenoid content would increase the uncertainties of the feed manufacturer when using the product which could no longer be used on the basis of the characteristics given by the authorisation. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. Panaferd-AX (sterilised cells of astaxanthin-rich Paracoccus carotinifaciens) dossier. June 2009. Submitted by Food Chemical Risk Analysis. 2. Comments from Member States received through the ScienceNet. REFERENCES EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Safety and efficacy of Panaferd-AX (red carotenoidrich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens) as feed additive for salmon and trout - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. The EFSA Journal (2007) 546, 27-30. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/efsa/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178650355146.htm 8