Clinical Documentation Improvement: Reporting Opportunities

Similar documents
2015 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

APR DRG Data Discovery

Advanced SmarTrack Worklists

Readmission Analysis Using 3M Methodology

Standardizing Detection of Acute Kidney Injury in an Integrated Delivery Health System

Palliative Care and Hospice in an Accountable Care Model. Key Strategies to a Successful Integrated Delivery System

Statit pimd Client Panel. Guy March, Product Lead, Midas+ Statit

Using APR-DRG DataVision Reports for Hospital Ranking and Physician Review

Leveraging the Value of Midas+ DataVision Toolpacks. Brenda Pettyjohn RN, CPHQ Midas+ DataVision Clinical Consultant

Aligning Quality Outcomes Data with Financial Performance

This is the Full Title of a Session

Potential disruption from private exchanges and narrow networks. In 2011, less than 10% of companies used High Performing Networks (narrow networks)

3/20/2013. "ICD-10 Update Understanding and Analyzing GEMs" March 10, 2013

RTT Exception Report

Advanced SmarTrack Worklist Rules

Q&A CDI Q A Q A WEEK. Technology. How long have you had electronic health records?

NORTHERN HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE TRUST. Waiting Times Summary Report

Keeping Up with the Regulatory Requirements and Other Hocus Pocus. Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ Vice President and Product Manager ACS MIDAS+

Completing the Circle: Novel Methods for using PRO Scores in Shared Decision- Making and Patient Self-Management.

Blood Pressure Management: A Journey in Quality Improvement Phil E. Yphantides, M.D.

Palliative Care and IPOST Hospital Engagement Network June 5, Palliative Care

Curators of the University of Missouri - Combined January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

Emergency Department Boarding of Psychiatric Patients in Oregon

Policy Evaluation: Step Therapy Prior Authorization of Combination Inhaled Corticosteroid / Long-Acting Beta-Agonists

McLean ebasis plus TM

Keeping ICD-10 Relevant Amidst Change RVHIMA April 10, 2015

Curators of the University of Missouri - Combined January 01, 2013 through December 31, 2013 Cost Management Report

Infection Control: Meeting the Challenge

Dementia Content Report May Produced By The NHS Choices Reporting Team

Issue Brief. Eliminating Adult Dental Benefits in Medi-Cal: An Analysis of Impact. Introduction. Background

Referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times statistics for consultant-led elective care 2014 Annual Report

Session #206, March 8, 2018 Susan J. Kressly, MD, FAAP, Kressly Pediatrics Dr. Jacques Orces, D.O., Nicklaus Children s Hospital

Positive Living Conference

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data July 2017

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data July 2018

FGSZ Zrt. from 28 February 2019 till 29 February 2020 AUCTION CALENDAR: YEARLY YEARLY BUNDLED AT CROSS BORDER POINTS

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data August 2017

HOW HEALTHY IS OUR COUNTY? 2013 COUNTY HEALTH RANKINGS & ROADMAPS

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (MRSA and MSSA) Bi-annual Report. Surveillance: Report:

Health Equity Workgroup. January 18, 2018

Trust Board Meeting in Public: Wednesday 11 July 2018 TB

Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Hospital Inpatient Proposed Rule Interventional Cardiology, Peripheral Interventions & Rhythm Management

WATCHMAN. For questions regarding WATCHMAN reimbursement, please contact:

Statistical Press Notice NHS referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times data November 2016

Monitoring Protocol for Clozapine-induced Myocarditis. Copyright 2017, CAMH

Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Financial Implications of Coding Inaccuracies in Patients Undergoing EVAR

ESPA Directorate KPI Report: Quarter 1,

Urinary Catheters Do Not Have to Be Removed if They Were Never Placed

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Surveillance Update (with special reference to Colorectal Surgeries)

Who's Driving the DRG Bus: Selecting the Appropriate Principal Diagnosis

UnitedHealth Premium Program Case-mix Adjusted Benchmarks with Severity or Risk Adjustment

Implementation of an Interprofessional Team to Prevent Inpatient Hypoglycemic Events. September 13, 2016

Integration of Specialty Care into ACOs: Considering JMAP and Beyond

Lessons learned in the use of digital imaging at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Not all NLP is Created Equal:

Frightening Scenario or Manageable Change? Determining the Realistic Reimbursement Impact of ICD-10 on MS-DRGs. Lori Jayne, RHIA Donna Smith, RHIA

Alignment Strategies at the JPS Health Network

IMPLEMENTING RECOVERY ORIENTED CLINICAL SERVICES IN OPIOID TREATMENT PROGRAMS PILOT UPDATE. A Clinical Quality Improvement Program

What ASMBS Members Need to Know About: New Medicare Payment Policy Governing Bariatric Surgery and Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs)

INFLUENZA Surveillance Report Influenza Season

Cincinnati Children s Hospital Medical Center PHO/OVPCA Constipation Initiative Monthly Report February 2018

Precyse University ICD-10 Education Tracks

BJA Performance Measures

Dengue: A disease burden in Sri Lanka A Complex Phase III Vaccine Trial

CURRICULUM PACING CHART ACES Subject: Science-Second Grade

UNDERSTANDING NEW HAMPSHIRE DENTAL CLAIMS DATA

An Updated Approach to Colon Cancer Screening and Prevention

Texas Vendor Drug Program Specialty Drug List Process. February 2019

Jay H. Hoofnagle, M.D. Director, Liver Disease Research Branch Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition National Institute of Diabetes and

Jukti Kumar Kalita, PhD Business Analytics and Insights Pfizer Presented at:

New Study Illuminates the Ongoing Road to ICD-10 Productivity and Optimization

INSIGHTS AND BEST PRACTICES FOR EMS AGENCIES

Capturing the Activity in Activity based funding

November Data Jam. Mastering PSYCKES: Maximizing Multiple Data Sources to Operationalize a Population Health Approach

Chronic Obstructive Learning Collaborative Sponsored by AMGA and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Complete Central Registry Treatment Information Requires Ongoing Reporting and Consolidation Well Beyond 6-Month Reporting

Querying Your Physicians for Inpatient MS-DRG & POA Are You in Compliance?

TRANSFORMING STROKE CARE IN THE CAPITAL: THE LONDON STROKE STRATEGY

4/1/2014 ICD-10 CM/PCS. Benefits to ICD-10. Fewer queries and/or requests for additional clarification. Fewer denials based on medical necessity

Reducing COPD Exacerbation Readmissions in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital

August 29, Dear Dr. Berwick:

Kansas EMS Naloxone (Narcan) Administration

Has the UK had a double epidemic?

Surveillance prioritisation and cost-effective delivery the Swedish perspective

APPENDIX ONE. 1 st Appointment (Non-admitted) recovery trajectories

One Palliative Care Annual Report

2016 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

Making the Most of Your Cancer Registry

2017 National Medicaid & CHIP Oral Health Symposium. Non-Ventilator Pneumonia and Oral Health Natalia I. Chalmers, DDS, PhD

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System (SQRMS)

Utilizing Automated Adverse Event Detection

Reducing Readmissions and Improving Outcomes at OhioHealth Mansfield Hospital:

Commissioning Chemotherapy Services Conference. Issues of consent in systemic therapy

Measuring Complications of Treatment: Diagnoses Not Present on Admission. Henry Johnson, MD MPH Medical Director June 6, 2007

County of Santa Clara Public Health Department

Publication Plan 2017

Conversion of Whole Blood Donors to Plasma Pheresis Donors

Paradigm Shift in Surgical Training with Robotic Surgery and New Technology

How R are you coding severe sepsis? Why the R-code matters

Transcription:

Clinical Documentation Improvement: Reporting Opportunities Karee Burns, RN, BSN Midas+ Solutions Consultant Waheed Baqai, MPH, CPH Director Clinical Decision Support Loma Linda University Medical Center

Objectives 1. Attendees will be able to state a process for identifying key CDI processes and stakeholders. 2. At the end of the presentation, staff will be able to identify Midas+ reporting tools that can be used to develop reports for CDI processes and stakeholders. 3. Attendees will be able to identify how reporting from Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) efforts can have an impact on their National Quality Forum (NQF) scores. 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 2

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, all patient, provider, and / or employee names in the following slides are fictitious. No HIPAA regulations were violated in the creation of this presentation. In other words: These reports are from the Midas+ demo database. That s why the dates are older and the numbers are small! The reports will work just as well using your real, live data. 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 3

Adult and Pediatric Level I Trauma Center Four campuses Regional CCS (California Children s Services designation) Children s Hospital Service to >26% of California 4 Million People LLUMC 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 4

LLUMC: Who We Are 13,500 Employees 4,200 Students 700+ Residents in 26 programs & 21 fellowships 1.5 Million patient visits annually 850 Physicians in 55 specialties & subspecialties 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 5

LLUMC s Clinical Documentation Improvement Program Reports to Patient Safety and Reliability under V.P. Patient Safety and Quality/Chief Patient Safety Officer Five full-time CDS RNs Medicare/DRG-based Payers Only Program started in May 2008 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 6

Hospital 1 Hospital 2 Hospital 3 LLUMC Hospital 4 Hospital 5 Hospital 6 Hospital 7 Hospital 8 Hospital 9 Hospital 10 Hospital 11 Hospital 12 LLUMC 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 7

LLUMC Mortality by Calendar Year LLUMC Actual Expected 4.0% 3.9% 3.8% 3.7% 3.6% 3.5% 3.4% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 3.0% 2.9% 2.8% 2.7% 2.6% 2.5% 3.6% 3.5% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 CMS MedPar: Q4 2003 to Q3 2008 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 8

LLUMC Medicare Inpatient Case Mix Index 1.568 1.773 1.868 1.969 1.967 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 9

LLUMC Among the Best in 7 specialties: 2010 Pulmonology Cancer Diabetes & Endocrinology ENT Gynecology Kidney Disorders Urology 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 10

LLUMC 2011 Among the Best in 10 specialties: Cancer Cardiology and Heart Disease Diabetes & Endocrinology ENT Gastroenterology Gynecology Nephrology Orthopedics Pulmonology Urology 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 11

CDI Reporting LLUMC Reporting has been key component in success of CDI at LLUMC Determining what type of data and frequency of review are important steps in CDI maintenance and success Transition from previous vendor to Midas+ Care Management CDI Module required reporting to be robust with minimal interruption 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 12

Getting Started 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 13

Determining Reporting Needs Review: Program Goals Key Stakeholders Determines types of reports Process Indicators for key process points Module 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 14

Program Goals - General Identify and clarify missing, conflicting, or nonspecific physician documentation related to diagnoses and procedures Support accurate diagnostic and procedural coding, DRG assignment, severity of illness, and expected risk of mortality, leading to appropriate reimbursement Promote health record completion during the patient s course of care Improve communication between physicians and other members of the healthcare team Provide education Improve documentation to reflect quality and outcome scores Improve coders clinical knowledge 2010 AHIMA - CDI Toolkit 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 15

Program Goals / Metrics - Departmental Example: All DRG payers are reviewed Case Mix Index will improve Improved documentation reflected in quality and outcome scores 80% of Major Disease populations reviewed 30-35 charts reviewed per reviewer per day 85 90% Queries with Physician response 2011 Midas+ Symposium: The Right Care, the Right Reimbursement 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 16

Stakeholders Executive Leadership Financial CDI Department CDI Specialists Medical Staff Leadership Providers 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 17

CDI Team Departmental General statistics Manager Productivity Detailed statistics CDI Specialists Individual productivity Competency 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 18

Medical Staff Leadership Queries Query Response rates Providers Queries Query Response rates 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 19

About Data Entry The government are very keen on amassing statistics. They collect them, add them, raise them to the nth power, take the cube root and prepare wonderful diagrams. But you must never forget that every one of these figures comes in the first instance from the village watchman, who just puts down what he damn pleases. Anonymous English Judge (Quoted by Sir Josiah Stamp in Some Economic Matters in Modern Life (1929) 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 20

Data Entry Lays the groundwork for reporting Define terms Determine which fields must be completed Create Worklists to check for incomplete fields Validation Rules in User Fields 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 21

The Clinical Documentation Process - LLUMC Retrospective Queries Physician Documentation Documentation Specialist Intervention Physician Response Coder Intervention Physician Response Concurrent Queries Final coded data that represents: Severity of Illness Services Received Case Mix Index Quality of Care Indicators for Medicare 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 22

Process Create Indicators for key steps in your process 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 23

General tab 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 24

Queries tab 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 25

Outcomes tab 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 26

Payers tab 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 27

Other Focus Study or User Fields Staff Reviews Communication with HIM Coders Manual Indicators Case Mix Index 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 28

Episode User Fields 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 29

Series User Fields Adapted from DCH Health System 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 30

Series User Fields Adapted from 2010 AHIMA CDI Toolkit 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 31

Remember: ReporTrack Library Focus Study Library List Serve CPMS / DataVision indicators 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 32

Metrics 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 33

Defining Your Terms Chart Coverage Rate Percent of all inpatient charts receiving at least one CDI chart review Query Rate Total CDI queries issued as a percentage of chart reviews performed Physician Response Rate Total physician responses (positive or negative) received as a percentage of total CDI queries issued Physician Agreement Rate Physician responses in agreement with the CDI query as a percentage of total physician responses received Maximizing Performance on Clinical Documentation 2010 The Advisory Board Company 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 34

CDI Metrics DRG Reassignment Rate Total DRG reassignments as a percentage of CDI chart reviews Actual Revenue Impact Aggregate incremental reimbursement resulting from a shift to a higher-value DRG or capture of a CC or MCC designation CC/MCC Capture Rate Percentage of concurrently reviewed charts coded with a CC or MCC designation Maximizing Performance on Clinical Documentation 2010 The Advisory Board Company 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 35

Overall Indicators Total Accounts Accounts Reviewed Queries LLUMC Metrics Agree, Disagree, Unanswered Queries by Provider, Service, Provider Group Encounters with working DRGs w/o CC/MCC Final vs. CDI DRG mismatch 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 36

Reports 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 37

Leadership Reports 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 38

Leadership Reports Volume Initial reviews Follow-up reviews Reviews & Queries Total population Queries Responses Agreement/disagreement No responses Outcome Analysis Count by Outcome Type Coder to reviewer Coding correction Goal DRG met Higher reimbursement Increased severity No change Financial Impact Overall program revenue impact 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 39

Leadership Profile 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 40

Financial Reports Volume Admissions Reviews Financial Class Review Rate Reviews Diagnoses POA / NPOA CC / MCC Capture Procedures Queries Volume Type Response Rate Agreement Rate Outcomes Outcome Reimbursement Delta Financial Impact Overall program revenue impact 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 41

Financial Profile Section 1: Volumes Section 2: Reviews 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 42

Financial Profile Section 3: Queries Section 4: Outcomes 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 43

Financial Report ReporTrack Library: CDI_CMI_DETAILS 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 44

Financial Report ReporTrack Library: CDI_CMI Same report, with details suppressed 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 45

Financial Report ReporTrack Library: CDI_FINANCIAL_IMPACT 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 46

Computing ROI To compute the dollars gained as a result of CDI interventions, generally one multiplies the difference between the initial DRG and the coded DRG by the hospital base rate. To do this in Midas+ build a computed field at the CDI Series User Field level. The Weight should be the hospital s Medicare Base Rate in this example we ve used $5000. 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 47

Computing ROI (cont) In CDI once the final DRG comes across, the HCM CDI: Initial Weight Delta is computed automatically. Since this field is based on that value it will compute when the episode is opened and saved. It will display the dollars gained as a result of the CDI staff interventions to assign an appropriate DRG. The added benefit is that this value then becomes a sum variable in SmarTrack so you can put the total dollars gained from your CDI program on a CDI profile or use it in a ReporTrack report. 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 48

CDI Department 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 49

CDI Department Use reports to help End-Users: Understand the process Understand their role in the process Appreciate their importance Demonstrate competency 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 50

CDI Department Chart coverage rate Query rate on chart reviews Physician response rate Physician agreement rate DRG reassignments Annual revenue impact Physician response rate Physician concurrence rate Retrospective clarification rate CC/MCC capture rate Case mix index (CMI) 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 51

Departmental Profile Section 1: Volumes 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 52

Departmental Profile Section 2: Reviews 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 53

Departmental Profile Section 3: Queries 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 54

Departmental Profile Section 4: Outcomes 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 55

Department Manager Section 1: Volumes 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 56

Department Manager Section 2: Reviews Section 3: Queries 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 57

Department Manager Section 4: Outcomes 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 58

CDI Specialist Chart coverage Initial reviews Follow-up reviews Follow-up frequency Queries on total chart reviews Appropriate DRG selection Physician response rate Physician agreement rate 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 59

CDI Specialist CDI_REVIEWS_BY_CDIS 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 60

CDI Specialist Section 1: Volumes Section 2: Reviews 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 61

CDI Specialist Crosstab by Reviewer, then edit crosstabs at time of compilation to limit to one reviewer. 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 62

CDI Specialist Section 3: Queries 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 63

CDI Specialist Section 4: Outcomes 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 64

CDI Specialist Section 5: Validation Reviews (Series User Fields) 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 65

Medical Staff Reports 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 66

Medical Staff Count of Queries by Provider Sum of Relative Weight Delta - Initial to Final DRG Count of CC/MCC Rate of Positive Query Responses by Provider Count of Queries by Subject 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 67

Provider Departments routinely compile CDI query response data Each physician provided with a pseudonym Blinded rankings displayed publicly Physicians gauge individual performance relative to peers Departments set target query response rates Physician performance evaluated relative to expectations 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 68

Provider 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 69

Other Tools 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 70

Other Tools Graphs Standard Reports Worksheets Assignments Midas+ Train system Sample indicators and reports 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 71

May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 CDI Physician Query Response Rates LLUMC Agree Disagree Unanswered Goal 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 72

Graphs When viewing Profile, double-click on indicator name to create graph 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 73

Graph Easily view trends over time 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 74

Graph Graphing Crosstabs 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 75

Graph by Crosstabs 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 76

SPC Chart Click on SPC icon to create an Statistical Process Control (SPC) chart 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 77

SPC Chart 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 78

SPC Chart 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 79

SPC Chart Click on data point in SPC Chart to see documentation options 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 80

Additional Midas+ Reporting Benefits That Support CDI Identify cases for concurrent review for VBP and other programs Identify cases of HAC s and HAI s and other cases for documentation opportunities (DataVision) Patient Safety Indicators (Falls, Pressure Ulcers, Failure to Rescue, OB complications, Retained Objects) 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 81

In Closing 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 82

Review of Objectives 1. Attendees will be able to state a process for identifying key CDI processes and stakeholders. 2. At the end of the presentation, staff will be able to identify Midas+ reporting tools that can be used to develop reports for CDI processes and stakeholders. 3. Attendees will be able to identify how reporting from Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) efforts can have an impact on their National Quality Forum (NQF) scores. 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 83

Bibliography 2010 AHIMA - CDI Toolkit 2011 Midas+ Symposium: The Right Care, the Right Reimbursement Elizabeth Barnes, Steven Savant Maximizing Performance on Clinical Documentation 2010 The Advisory Board Company 21st Annual Midas+ User Symposium May 20 23, 2012 Tucson, Arizona 84

Thank you for attending. Questions, anyone? Karee Burns Midas+ Solutions Consultant karee.burns@acs-inc.com Waheed Baqai Loma Linda University Medical Center wbaqai@llu.edu