EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE PRODUCTION AMONG AMPICILLIN-RESISTANT ESCHERICHIA COLI STRAINS FROM CHICKEN IN ENUGU STATE, NIGERIA

Similar documents
Prevalence of Extended Spectrum -Lactamases In E.coli and Klebsiella spp. in a Tertiary Care Hospital

EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR AMPC β-lactamase IN GRAM NEGATIVE CLINICAL ISOLATES FROM TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS

Journal of Infectious Diseases and

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Sept. 1998, p Vol. 36, No. 9. Copyright 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Discussion points CLSI M100 S19 Update. #1 format of tables has changed. #2 non susceptible category

Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae pathogens isolated from intensive care units and surgical units in Russia

Screening and detection of carbapenemases

Affinity of Doripenem and Comparators to Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Escherichia coli and ACCEPTED

Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriacae from Clinical Isolates

Report on susceptibility of Salmonella serotypes in Belgium Vicky Jasson

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR); July 2014.

In-House Standardization of Carba NP Test for Carbapenemase Detection in Gram Negative Bacteria

breakpoints, cephalosporins, CLSI, Enterobacteriacae, EUCAST, review Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14 (Suppl. 1):

Overcoming the PosESBLities of Enterobacteriaceae Resistance

Molecular characterisation of CTX-M-type extendedspectrum β-lactamases of Escherichia coli isolated from a Portuguese University Hospital

Comparision of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing As Per CLSI and Eucast Guidelines for Gram Negative Bacilli

Expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing: State of the art

ALERT. Clinical microbiology considerations related to the emergence of. New Delhi metallo beta lactamases (NDM 1) and Klebsiella

Public Health Surveillance for Multi Drug Resistant Organisms in Orange County

EUCAST Frequently Asked Questions. by author. Rafael Cantón Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain EUCAST Clinical Data Coordinator

Downloaded from ismj.bpums.ac.ir at 10: on Friday March 8th 2019

Insert for Kit 98006/98010/ KPC/Metallo-B-Lactamase Confirm Kit KPC+MBL detection Kit KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit REVISION: DBV0034J

Received 30 March 2005; returned 16 June 2005; revised 8 September 2005; accepted 12 September 2005

Clinical Microbiology Newsletter

Differentiation of Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae by Triple disc Test

Phenotypic expression and prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in samples collectedfrompatientsinvariouswardsof Mulago Hospital, Uganda

Comparative Activity of Cefotaxime and Selected f3-lactam Antibiotics Against Haemophilus Influenzae and Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli

Prevalence of ESBL producing enterobacteriaceae in diabetic foot ulcers

Detecting CRE. what does one need to do?

AMPC BETA LACTAMASES AMONG GRAM NEGATIVE CLINICAL ISOLATES FROM A TERTIARY HOSPITAL, SOUTH INDIA. Mohamudha Parveen R., Harish B.N., Parija S.C.

Carbapenem Disks on MacConkey agar as screening methods for the detection of. Carbapenem-Resistant Gram negative rods in stools.

Cephalosporin MIC Distribution of Extended-Spectrum- -Lactamaseand pampc-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Species

Expert rules. for Gram-negatives

NONFERMENTING GRAM NEGATIVE RODS. April Abbott Deaconess Health System Evansville, IN

Enterobacteriaceae in Bamako, Mali. Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Reims, UFR Médecine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Julie Creighton and Clare Tibbs. Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch

In Vitro Susceptibility Pattern of Cephalosporin- Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Received 21 September 1999/Returned for modification 26 November 1999/Accepted 18 February 2000

Distribution of TEM, SHV and CTX-M Genes among ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Iran

Epidemiology of ESBL in hospitals and in the community

SUPPLEMENTAL TESTING. Tan Thean Yen

Nature and Science 2017;15(10)

Cefotaxime Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th September 2010

Imported chicken meat as a potential source of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum b-lactamases in the UK

Guidance on screening and confirmation of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE) December 12, 2011

Report: antimicrobial resistance in commensal E. coli from poultry, pigs, cows and veal calves. 2013

β-lactamase inhibitors

URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN DIABETIC PATIENTS ATTENDING OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENTS AT KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE TEACHING HOSPITAL, MANIPAL, INDIA

Phenotypic Detection Methods of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae

CAT Critically Appraised Topic

Academic Perspective in. David Livermore Prof of Medical Microbiology, UEA Lead on Antibiotic resistance PHE

ST11 KPC-2 Klebsiella pneumoniae detected in Taiwan

(DHA-1): Microbiologic and Clinical Implications

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Isolates. in a Phase 3 Open-label Clinical Trial for Complicated

Against Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli

Sensitivity of Surveillance Testing for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in the

Carbapenems and Enterobacteriaceae

Roula M. Abdel-Massih Dept. of Biology, University of Balamand, Lebanon

Use of Faropenem as an Indicator of Carbapenemase Activity

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases

Detection of NDM-1, VIM-1, KPC, OXA-48, and OXA-162 carbapenemases by MALDI- TOF mass spectrometry

Sensitive and specific Modified Hodge Test for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase

Rapid identification of emerging resistance in Gram negatives. Prof. Patrice Nordmann

2612 Page. *Yusuf, I 1., Rabiu A.T 1., Haruna, M 2. and Abdullahi, S. A 3. Phone:

Detecting carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae

American Medical Journal 2 (1): 54-58, 2011 ISSN Science Publications

CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Valledupar, Colombia

Development of a phenotypic method for fecal carriage detection of OXA-48-producing

In vitro assessment of dual drug combinations to inhibit growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 with KPC-2 in Hong Kong. Title. Ho, PL; Tse, CWS; Lai, EL; Lo, WU; Chow, KH

MHSAL Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistant Organisms (AROs) - Response to Questions

CARBAPENEMASE PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIACEAE

jmb Research Article Review Semi Kim 1, Ji Youn Sung 2, Hye Hyun Cho 3, Kye Chul Kwon 1, and Sun Hoe Koo 1 *

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

A new selective blood agar medium for Streptococcus pyogenes and other haemolytic streptococci

Extended-Spectrum -Lactamases: a Clinical Update

Laboratory CLSI M100-S18 update. Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training Coordinator

Z. Daoud 1 and N. Hakime 2

Klebsiella pneumoniae 21 PCR

SSRG International Journal of Medical Science (SSRG-IJMS) volume 2 Issue 4 April 2015

Update on CLSI and EUCAST

Cefuroxime iv Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th September 2010

Treatment Options for Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum Β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

Antimicrobial activity of Terminalia chebula

Received 31 January 2011/Returned for modification 2 March 2011/Accepted 15 March 2011

Educational Workshops 2016

February 2017, Volume: 9, Issue: 2, Pages: , DOI:

Frequency of Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria from ICU Patients with Pneumonia

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 13 October 2008 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: /aac

Resistance to Polymyxins in France

Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Prof P. Nordmann Bicêtre hospital, South-Paris Med School

Chapter 4. Anti-bacterial studies of PUFA extracts from Sardinella longiceps and Sardinella fimbriata. 4.1 Introduction

Cephalosporin, Against Cephalosporin-Resistant Bacteria, and

Validating a selection method for. H. Hasman, Y. Agersø, C. Svendsen, H. Nielsen, N.S. Jensen, B. Guerra, Aarestrup, FM

COMPARATIVE ANTI MICROBIAL STUDY OF SHUDDHA KASISA AND KASISA BHASMA

Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Methodological and interpretative problems in antimicrobial susceptiblity tests of P. aeruginosa

Evaluation of CHROMagar msupercarba for the detection of carbapenemaseproducing Gram-negative organisms

Methods for colistin testing What works and what does not? Erika Matuschek, Ph D EUCAST Development Laboratory, EDL

Transcription:

Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (2007) 38:681-686 ISSN 1517-8382 EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE PRODUCTION AMONG AMPICILLIN-RESISTANT ESCHERICHIA COLI STRAINS FROM CHICKEN IN ENUGU STATE, NIGERIA Chah, K.F. 1 *; Oboegbulem, S.I. 2 1 Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology; 2 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Nigeria, Nsukka Enugu State, Nigeria Submitted: February 20, 2007; Returned to authors for corrections: May 19, 2007; Approved: September 20, 2007. ABSTRACT One hundred and seventy-two ampicillin-resistant E. coli strains isolated from commercial chickens in Enugu State, Nigeria, were screened for beta-lactamase production using the broth method with nitrocefin as the chromogenic cephalosporin to detect enzyme production. Beta-lactamase producing strains were further examined for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production using the Oxoid combination discs method. One hundred and seventy (98.8%) of the 172 ampicillin-resistant E. coli strains produced beta-lactamase enzyme. Sixteen (9.4%) beta-lactamase producers were phenotypically confirmed to produce ESBLs. Six of the ESBL producing strains were only detected with ceftazidime versus ceftazidime/clavulanate combination while ten of the ESBL producers were detected with cefotaxime versus cefotaxime/clavulanate combination. Chicken may serve as a reservoir of ESBL-producing E. coli strains which could be transferred to man and other animals. Key word: Ampicillin-resistant, Escherichia coli, beta-lactamase, extended-spectrum INTRODUCTION Beta-lactam antibiotics account for approximately 50% of global antibiotic consumption and this heavy usage has exerted considerable selection for resistance (13). Production of betalactamases is the commonest cause of resistance to β-lactam antibacterial agents among Gram-negative bacteria (21). These enzymes undermined the utilization of ampicillin and first and second-generation cephalosporins in the chemotherapy of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. To overcome the problems posed by the β-lactamase enzymes, third- and fourthgeneration (extended-spectrum) cephalosporins were developed. Unfortunately, members of the Family Enterobacteriaceae have developed resistance to these extended-spectrum cephalosporins via production of extended-spectrum betalactamases (ESBLs) (6,9). Apart from the ESBL enzymes, resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in enterobacteria has also been found to be mediated by AmpC β- lactamases (20). These enzymes are resistant to cephalosporin/ clavulanate combination. Human clinical strains of Escherichia coli producing ESBLs have been described from different parts of the world (5,8,16, 21). In Nigeria, these enzymes have been reported in Enterobacter species from human patients in Lagos (1). Escherichia coli strains resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins have been isolated from calves (2) and dogs (23). This study was undertaken to assess ampicillin-resistant E. coli strains isolated from chickens for β-lactamase and extended-spectrum β-lactamase production. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains One hundred and seventy-two ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli strains isolated from commercial chickens (broilers and layers) in Enugu State, Nigeria were used in the study. *Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Nigeria, Nsukka Enugu State, Nigeria. E-mail: kfchah@yahoo.com 681

Chah, K.F. et al. Detection of beta-lactamase production Test E. coli strains were screened for β-lactamase production using the broth method (14). Two colonies of each of the test bacteria were picked from an over night nutrient agar culture plate and inoculated into 1ml of sterile nutrient broth. Inoculated broths were appropriately labeled and incubated at 37ºC for 18 hours. After incubation, four drops of nitrocefin (R) solution (Calbiochem, Germany), prepared as directed by the manufacturer, were added to the broth culture and observed for colour change within 30minutes. Nitrocefin (R) is a chromogenic cephalosporin that changes colour from yellow to red on hydrolysis. Beta-lactamase production was inferred when the broth turned red within 30minutes of addition of reagent. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) expression by Escherichia coli strains This was done by initially screening for susceptibility to two extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefotaxime; Oxoid, England). Presumptive ESBL-producers were subjected to Phenotypic Confirmatory test for ESBL production. Susceptibility test Beta-lactamase producing E. coli strains were screened for susceptibility to ceftazidime (30 µg) and cefotaxime (30 µg), using the standard disc diffusion method in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (18). Test bacteria were grown on Nutrient agar for 18 hours at 37ºC and colonies of the bacteria were suspended in sterile normal saline and the inoculum density adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. Surfaces of Mueller-Hinton agar were flooded with the standardized bacterial suspension and excess fluid drained into a discard pot containing Isol disinfectant. With a disc dispenser (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England), ceftazidime (CAZ-30 µg) and cefotaxime (CTX-30 µg) were placed on the inoculated plates. The plates were incubated at 37ºC for 24 hours. After incubation the diameters of zones of inhibition around each antibacterial disc were measured with a metre rule. Each test was performed in triplicate and the mean inhibition zone diameter determined and recorded to the nearest whole millimetre. The strains were interpreted as susceptible or resistant according to the NCCLS criteria. According to these criteria, an Escherichia coli strain with a mean inhibition zone size equal to or less than 20mm was considered resistant to ceftazidime (30 µg) while each strain with mean zone diameter of less or equal to 22 mm was considered resistant to cefotaxime (30 µg). Also, in accordance with NCCLS guidelines a strain that produced a zone size 22 mm with ceftazidime or 27 mm with cefotaxime was considered a presumptive or possible extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producer. These possible ESBL-producers were subjected to Phenotypic Confirmatory test for ESBL expression. Phenotypic confirmation of ESBL production Presumptive ESBL-producing E. coli strains were tested by the Oxoid Combination Disc method (3,14) to confirm ESBL production. This test was done in accordance with standard recommendations (18). Two pairs of combination discs (ceftazidime-30 µg versus ceftazidime/clavulanate -30/10 µg and cefotaxime-30 µg versus cefotaxime/clavulanate - 30/10 µg) were used for the test. These discs were placed on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar inoculated with the standardized inoculum of the test bacteria. After 24hours incubation at 37ºC the inhibition zones produced were measured. Each test was performed in duplicate and mean zone size recorded to the nearest whole millimetre. An E. coli strain was interpreted as ESBL-producers if there was a difference in zone size of 5 mm between the combination disc compared to that of the cephalosporin alone. RESULTS Beta-lactamase production Using the nitrocefin (R) solution, beta-lactamase production was detected in 170 (98.8%) of 172 ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli strains screened. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production The distribution of the mean inhibition zone diameters around the two cephalosporin discs (ceftazidime-30 µg and cefotaxime-30 µg) for the 170 β-lactamase producing E. coli strains is presented in Fig. 1. As shown in the figure, the zone sizes ranged from 18 mm to 40 mm for ceftazidime and 18 mm to 45 mm for cefotaxime. Using NCCLS (18) breakpoints for susceptibility, 16 (9.4%) of the test strains were resistant to ceftazidime while 14 (8.2%) were resistant to cefotaxime. Of the 170 beta-lactamase producing strains, 52 (30.6%) were presumptively identified as ESBL-producers with ceftazidime while 62 (36.5%) were detected as possible ESBL-producers with cefotaxime. However, when both discs were taken into consideration, 76 (44.7%) of the strains were predicted as ESBL producers. The proportion of the beta-lactamase producing E. coli strains resistant to ceftazidime alone, cefotaxime alone or both discs is presented on Table 1. The distribution of inhibition zone differences of the possible ESBL-producers is shown in Fig. 2. Out of the 52 presumptive ESBL-producers detected by ceftazidime, 6 (11.5%) were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL with ceftazidime versus ceftazidime/clavulanate combination discs while 10 (16.1%) of the 62 possible ESBL producing E. coli strains detected with cefotaxime were confirmed as ESBL-producers with cefotaxime versus cefotaxime/clavulanate discs. When both pairs of Oxoid combination discs were taken into consideration, 16 (21.1%) of the 76 possible extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing E. coli strains were confirmed to express ESBL phenotype. Thus, 682

ESBL-producing E. coli Figure 1. Inhibition zone diameters of ceftazidime (CAZ) and cefotaxime (CTX) against ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli strains. Table 1. Phenotypes of ampicillin-resistant E. coli strains isolated from chicken in Enugu State (N=170) Phenotype Phenotype detected with Ceftazidime 1 Cefotaxime 2 Both discs 3 Cephalosporin resistance a 10 (5.9)* 8 (4.7) 6 (3.5) Presumptive ESBL-producer b 14 (8.2) 24 (14.1) 38 (22.4) Confirmed ESBL-producer c 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9) 0 (0.0) Cephalosporin/clavulanate resistance d 4 (2.4) 18 (10.6) 2 (1.2) * = Figures in parenthesis represent percentage of beta-lactamase producing E. coli strains examined a = Ceftazidime resistance (zone size 20 mm); cefotaxime resistance (zone size 22 mm) b = Strain with zone size 22 mm with ceftazidime or zone size 27 mm with cefotaxime c = Strain with cephalosporin/clavulanate vs plain cephalosporin zone difference 5 mm d = Strains with cephalosporin/clavulanate vs plain cephalosporin zone difference of 0mm 1 = Phenotype detected with ceftazidime but not with cefotaxime 2 = Phenotype detected with cefotaxime but not with ceftazidime 3 = Phenotype detected with ceftazidime and also with cefotaxime 16 (9.4%) of the 170 beta-lactamase producing E. coli strains examined were ESBL producers. Out of the 76 possible ESBL producing strains, 24 (31.6%) were unaffected by at least one of the test cephalosporin/clavulanate discs as evidenced by zero zone difference between the cephalosporin versus cephalosporin/clavulanate combination discs. The proportion of the beta-lactamase producing E. coli strains presumptively identified as ESBL-producer and phenotypically confirmed as ESBL-producers with either ceftazidime versus ceftazidime/clavulanate, cefotaxime versus cefotaxime/clavulanate or both combination discs is presented on Table 1. The inhibition zones produced around combination discs by ESBL-producing E. coli strains are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. DISCUSSION Antibacterial preparations containing β-lactams, particularly ampicillin, are widely used for prophylaxis and chemotherapy of avian bacterial infections in Nigeria (4). Heavy usage of β- lactam antibacterials exerts considerable selection for resistance to this class of antibacterial agents (15). In this study 98.8% of 683

Chah, K.F. et al. Figure 2. Inhibition zone differences produced by test cephalosporins alone and in combination with clavulanate. Figure 3. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing E. coli strain.confirmed with ceftazidime-clavulanate (a) versus ceftazidime alone (b). the 172 ampicillin-resistant E. coli strains tested were betalactamase producers, while only 2 (1.2%) were non-producers. This observation supports previous reports (11,12) that resistance to β-lactams in E. coli is mainly due to production of beta-lactamases. These enzymes hydrolyze the cyclic amide Figure 4. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing E. coli strain. Confirmed with cefotaxime- clavulanate (c) versus cefotaxime alone (d). bond in the β-lactam molecule leading to the formation of penicilloic acid or cephalosporoic acid (7). These products are unable to bind to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) located on the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and therefore cannot inhibit 684

ESBL-producing E. coli bacterial cell wall formation. However, it has been pointed out other mechanisms mediating resistance to β-lactams include porin deficiency, modification of PBPs, and permeability barrier and efflux pumps (19). Resistance to ampicillin among the 2 non-β-lactamase producing E. coli strains may be due to one of the above resistance mechanisms. Although 52 (30.6%) and 62 (36.5%) of the β-lactamase producing E. coli strains were predicted as ESBL producers by ceftazidime and cefotaxime respectively, only 16 (9.4%) were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL producers. This is similar to the observations of previous workers (5,8). This underscores the need for phenotypic confirmation of ESBL production using Oxoid combination Disc method or other sensitive methods. In the present study, none of ESBL-producing strains confirmed with ceftazidime were identified as such with cefotaxime and vice versa. This observation supports previous reports that E. coli strains elaborate various types of ESBL enzymes with different substrate profiles (10). In the present study a greater proportion of the ESBLproducers were detected with cefotaxime alone versus cefotaxime/clavulanate discs than with ceftazidime versus ceftazidime/clavulanate discs. This finding is contrary to the observations of other investigators (8,10,17). However, the finding in this study that when both pairs of the combination discs were taken into consideration, a higher proportion of ESBL-producing strains were detected than the rate recorded for either pair taken separately is similar to the report of M Zali et al. (17) in which 86%, 65.5% and 93% of ESBL-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were detected by discs containing ceftazidime, cefotaxime and both agents taken into consideration respectively. Optimal substrate profile varies from one ESBL-producer to another (22). This may explain the differences in the ESBL detection rates by the different cephalosporins. The overall 9.4% detection rate of ESBL production among the 170 lactamase producing E. coli strains examined may not represent the actual prevalence of ESBL among the E. coli isolates studied. This is because some of the ESBL producers might have escaped detection by the Oxoid combination discs used in this study. It is therefore possible that the true prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers among E. coli strains in the poultry population in the state may be higher than the value recorded in this study. Hence, inclusion of a wide variety of cephalosporins (such as cefpodoxime, aztreonam, ceftriaxone, cehpalothin etc) in the screening panel could possibly increase the rate of detection of ESBL-producing E. coli strains. Although the occurrence of a wide variety of ß-lactamases in South Africa was believed to reflect over use of the newer extended spectrum cephalosporins in medical practice in that country (21), in Nigeria, these agents are not used in veterinary practice. Thus, the presence of ESBL producing E. coli strains in poultry in the country may not be related to overuse of these agents. However, ampicillin is widely used in poultry production in the country (4) and this agent may provide a selective pressure favouring the emergence of E. coli strains that produce ESBL enzymes. Results of this study have shown that ESBL producing E. coli strains are present in the chicken population in Nigeria. Chicken may therefore serve as reservoir of ESBL-producing E. coli strains, which could be transferred to humans and other animals. RESUMO Produção de beta-lactamase de espectro expandido por cepas de Escherichia coli resistentes a ampicilina isoladas de frango em Enugu State, Nigéria Cento e setenta e duas cepas de Escherichia coli resistentes a ampicilina isoladas de frangos em Enugu State, Nigéria, foram avaliadas quanto à produção de beta-lactamase através do uso de método em caldo com nitrocefin como indicador cromogênico da produção da enzima. Em seguida, as cepas produtoras de beta-lactamase foram examinadas quanto à produção de beta-lactamase de espectro expandido (ESBL) através do método de discos combinados Oxoid. Entre as cepas de Escherichia coli resistentes a ampicilina, cento e setenta (98,8%) produziram beta-lactamase. Testes fenotípicos indicaram que dezesseis (9,4%) das cepas produtoras de beta-lactamase produziram ESBL. Seis cepas produtoras de ESBL foram detectadas apenas com a combinação ceftazidima versus cefotaxime/clavulanato, enquanto dez cepas produtoras de ESBL foram detectadas com a combinação cefotaxime versus cefotaxime/clavulanato. Frangos podem ser reservatório de cepas de E.coli produtoras de ESBL, que podem ser transferidos para o homem e outros animais. Palavras-chave: Escherichia coli, resistência a ampicilina, betalactamase, espectro expandido REFERENCES 1. Aibinu, I.E.; Ohaegbulam, V.C.; Adenipekun, E.A.; Ogunsola, F.T.; Odugbemi, T.O.; Mee, B.J. (2003). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase enzymes in clinical isolates of Enterobacter species from Lagos, Nigeria. J. Clin. Microbiol., 41: 2197-2206. 2. Bradford, P.A.; Petersen, P.J.; Fingerman, I.M.; White, D.G. (1999). Characterization of expanded-spectrum cephalosporin resistance in E. coli isolates associated with bovine calf diarrhoeal disease. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 44: 607-610. 3. Carter, M.W.; Oakton, K.J.; Warner, M.; Livermore, D.M. (2000). Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Klebsiellae with Oxoid Combination Disc Method. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 4228-4232. 4. Chah, K.F.; Nweze, N.E. (2001): Antibiotic use in poultry production in Nsukka, Southeast Nigeria. Proc. Nig. Soc. Anim. Prod., 26: 69-72. 5. Emery, C.L.; Weymouth, L.A. (1997). Detection and clinical significance of extended -spectrum β-lactamases in a Tertiary care Medical center. J. Clin. Microbiol., 35: 2061-2067. 685

Chah, K.F. et al. 6. DuBois, S.K.; Marriott, M.S.; Amyes, S.G.B. (1995). TEM- and SHVderived extended-spectrum β-lactamases: relationship between selection, structure and function. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 35: 7-22. 7. Georgepa-padakou, N.H. (1993). Penicillin binding proteins and bacterial resistance to β-lactams. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 37: 2045-2053 8. Jacoby, G.A.; Han, P. (1996). Detection of extended spectrum β- Lactamase in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol., 34: 908-911. 9. Jacoby, G.A. (1997). Antimicrobial resistance: extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and other enzymes providing resistance to oxyiminobeta-lactams. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am., 11: 875-887. 10. Katsanis, G.P.; Spargo, J.; Ferraro, M.J.; Sutton, L.; Jacoby, G.A. (1994). Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains producing extended spectrum β-lactamase. J. Clin. Microbiol., 32: 691-696. 11. Ling, T.K.; Lyon, D.J.; Cheng, A.F.B.; French, G.L. (1994). In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility and β-lactamases of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli in Hong Kong. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 34: 65-71. 12. Liu, P.Y.F.; Gur, D.; Hall, L.M.C.; Livermore, D.L. (1992). Survey of the presence of β-lactamases among 1000 Gram-Negative bacilli isolated consecutively at the Royal London Hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 30: 429-447. 13. Livermore, D.M. (1998). β-lactamase-mediated resistance and opportunities for its control. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 41: S25-S41. 14. Livermore, D.M.; Brown, D.F. (2001). Detection of β-lactamasemediated resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 48: 59-64. 15. Livermore, D.M. (2003). Bacterial resistance; Origins, epidemiology and impact. Clin. Infect. Dis., 36: S11-23. 16. Mirza, S.H.; Salman, M.; Khurshid, U.; Wiqar, M.A. (2006). CTX- M ESBL enzymes in Escherichia coli from urology patients in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. J. Pak. Med. Assoc., 56: 576-578. 17. M Zali, F.H.; Chanawong, A.; Kerr, K.G.; Birkenhead, D.; Hawkey, P.M. (2000). Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of the MAST DD test, the double disc and the E-test. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 45: 881-885. 18. NCCLS (2002). National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals; Approved Standard - Second Edition. NCCLS document M31-A2.Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA. 19. Nikaido, H. (1996). Multidrug efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol., 179: 5853-5859. 20. Papanicolaou, G.A.; Medeiros, A.A.; Jacoby, G.A. (1990). Novel plasmid mediated β-lactamase (MR-1) conferring resistance to oxyimino- and -methoxy β-lactams in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 34: 2200-2209. 21. Pitout, J.D.D.; Thomson, K.S.; Hanson, N.D.; Ehrhardt, A.F. (1998). β-lactamase responsible for resistance to expanded spectrum cephalosporin in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis isolates recovered from South Africa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 42: 1350-1354. 22. Quinn, J.P.; Miyashiro, D.; Sahm, D.; Flamm, R.; Bush, K. (1989). Novel plasmid mediated β-lactamase (TEM-10) conferring selective resistance to ceftazidime and aztreonam in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 33: 1243-1244 23. Warren, A.L.; Townsend, K.M.; King, T.; Moss, S.; O Boyle, D.; Yates, R.M.; Trott, D.J. (2001). Multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum β-lactamase activity and fluoroquinolone resistance isolated from clinical infections in dogs. Aust. Vet. J., 79: 621-623. 686