Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010

Similar documents
Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010

ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014

Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events

Understanding Adverse Events

Adverse Events- Love them, hate them, report them!

PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION. Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012

Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS Version 2.0 January 2010

Adverse Experience Reporting

NCI CIRB Independent Model studies is described herein.

SAE håndtering i protokol CC MM-001

WELCOME TO ONLINE TRAINING FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH COORDINATORS

Safety Assessment in Clinical Trials and Beyond

Developing a Detection and Reporting System for Adverse Events. Deborah Hilgenberg Family Health International

GENERAL INFORMATION. Adverse Event (AE) Definition (ICH GUIDELINES E6 FOR GCP 1.2):

DEMOGRAPHICS PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES VITAL SIGNS. Protocol: ABC-123 SCREENING. Subject ID. Subject Initials. Visit Date: / / [ YYYY/MM/DD]

Safety Manual: DAD Trial

Guidance on Returning Research Results to Subjects

OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research

This SOP applies to all IRB administrative staff, members and investigators. IRB members, administrative staff and investigators.

Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Form Clinical Trials

Serious Adverse Event

RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

8.0 ADVERSE EVENT HANDLING

PHARMACOVIGILANCE GLOSSARY

Chapter 8: Safety, Adverse Events and Endpoints

Adverse Event Reporting. Good Clinical Practice

Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Form Clinical Trials

NOTICE OF INITIATION OF DISQUALIFICATION PROCEEDINGS AND OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

For a copy of slides please

WARNING LETTER. Ref: 09-HFD

Navigating the Regulatory Requirements of Pediatric Research Nathan Lee, CIP Vice Chair, Schulman IRB

1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

If the HPTN 082 protocol is amended in the future, this Letter of Amendment will be incorporated into the next version.

Subject experienced tachycardia and atrial fibrillation while engaged in a study in the Human Studies Facility

OHRP - Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens

AFDO Conference June 9, Mercedes Mota, Director Medical Device, Surgical Care Johnson & Johnson Quality & Compliance Worldwide

Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB

1. Comply with the NCI CIRB s requirements and directives;

Reporting to the IRB Part 2

ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING. Catherine Dillon, CCRP

Conducting Research Involving Medical Imaging

NIH StrokeNet Network Standard Operating Procedure

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

FDA issues final guidance on benefit-risk factors to consider in medical device product availability, compliance, and enforcement decisions

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

Stopping rules for FIM trials

Research & Development. J H Pacynko and J Illingworth. Research, pharmacy and R&D staff

Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT

Access to Experimental Therapies / FDA Expanded Access Programs

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

IND Exemption: Case Scenarios. Scenario No. 1

IRB Approval From: 3/8/2010 To: 10/28/2010

Safety Monitoring: The Patient Perspective. Kevin Weinfurt, PhD Kathryn Flynn, PhD

The Complaint Department: How IRBs Handle Complaints, Questions and Concerns from Study Participants

QA Program Evaluation Research Tool CF-195, Effective

IRB Review Points to Consider September 2016

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Revised August 28, 2018

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

SAFETY OF MEDICINES: CLINICAL C TRIALS AND PHARMACOVIGILANCE. Robert Lindblad, M.D. Chief Medical Officer The EMMES Corporation

Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process

SAFETY AND EFFICACY ASSESSMENTS

Enrolling Non-English Speaking Participants in Clinical Research: Regulatory and Practical Considerations Michele Russell-Einhorn, JD

SUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners

MedDRA Coding and Versioning

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS

FormsNet Adverse Event Form

Goal of site data management 12/2/2009. Ultimate goal: reliable and valid clinical trial to improve health

LONG-TERM INVESTIGATIVE FOLLOW-UP IN TRIALNET (LIFT) (Protocol TN-16)

ASSIGNED TREATMENT ARM

Good Clinical Practices

IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER)

Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review

International Research and the IRB: What you need to know before you go

IRB review of device studies

Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 01/19/2016. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT

Lecture 2. Key Concepts in Clinical Research

Adverse Events Following Immunisation. Castlebar, Nov. 8, 2013 Kevin Connolly

Serious Adverse Event Report Form (CTIMP)

Determining risk for research involving children. Angela Bain, IRB Specialist

NIDA Rationale Clean 1 09/17/06

Biomarker classification: a philosophical introduction.

Adverse Events Monitoring (aka Pharmacovigilance)

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

CMS Issues New Draft Guidance on Coverage with Evidence Development Policy for National Coverage Determinations

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

Adverse Event Monitoring and Reporting

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of ACTHar use in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

(Cochineal Extract and Carmine: Declaration by Name on the Label of All Foods and Cosmetic Products That Contain These Color Additives)

Transcription:

Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010

OUTLINE - AE (adverse event) - SAE (serious adverse event) - UP (unanticipated problem) - Unexpected - Related - Harmful - How does an AE become a UP? - Resources Research Compliance Office 2

Definitions AE any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human subject, temporally associated with a research study, whether or not it is related to the study Can encompass both psychological and physical harms Are not promptly reported to the IRB OHRP Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting UPs Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events Research Compliance Office 3

Definition SAE Serious Adverse Event SAE is an AE (untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a subject) that: 1) Results in death 2) Is life-threatening 3) Results in hospitalization (or prolongation of existing stay) 4) Results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity 5) Results in a congenital abnormality/defect 6) May jeopardize subject health, and requires surgery/medical intervention to prevent other 5 criteria Research Compliance Office 4

OHRP Consideration OHRP considers some SAEs and AEs important events because they may: SAEs/AEs are submitted during the continuing review process but modifications to the protocol or the ICF can be submitted at any time Research Compliance Office 5

OHRP Consideration OHRP considers some SAEs and AEs important events because they may: suggest that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm than what was previously known warrant changes in the protocol, ICF procedures/documents Research Compliance Office 6

OHRP Definition UPs Any incident, experience, or outcome that meets ALL of the following criteria: 1) unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, specificity or frequency) 2) related or possibly related to participation in a study 3) places subject or others at a greater risk of harm* than was previously recognized * including physical, social, economic or psychological harm Research Compliance Office 7

General Relationship Between AEs/UPs SAEs A = Adverse Events that are not Unanticipated Problems B= AE s that are UPs C= Unanticipated Problems that are NOT Adverse Events Under 45 CFR 46: Do not report A; Report B and C

UPs 45 CFR 46.103(a) and 45 CFR 46.103(b)(5) Unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or to others Are promptly reported to the IRB within 5 days of the PD discovery if death/lifethreatening situation occurs within 10 for all other UPs Initially determined to be UPs by monitoring entity, sponsor or PD IRB makes the final UP determination Research Compliance Office 9

Unexpected Example: Informed consent (or IB) states that you will get a slight rash at the injection site. Leland comes down with a rash from head to toe. Unexpected? Yes; severity was not expected Research Compliance Office 10

Related Leland comes down with a rash before administration of a medication. Related? No; he did not receive the drug before the rash Related : there is a reasonable possibility that the adverse event may have been caused by the procedures involved in the research (FDA: associated with the drug ) Research Compliance Office 11

Harmful The informed consent states that you may receive a minor rash within a few hours after administration of a drug. The rash was so severe, Leland was hospitalized and was unable to go to work. Harmful? Yes; it placed Leland at physical and economic risk (in terms of lost wages) Research Compliance Office 12

How does an AE become a UP? Leland has a bad reaction to a drug that was anticipated to last a few days, that now has lasted a few weeks. The rash worsens over time and is now diagnosed as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Harmful Related Unexpected 13 Research Compliance Office

GUI-P13 45 CFR 46.103(b)(5) Resources Guidance On Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/advevntguid.htm FDA Guidance: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/regulatoryinformation/gui dances/ucm127346.pdf