IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD.

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD CELLTRION, INC. Petitioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

Case 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246

October 16, UM 1885 Osprey Solar LLC, Complainant vs. Portland General Electric Company, Defendant

Case 3:10-cr ARC Document 137 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION II CASE NO. 16-CI ELECTRONICALLY FILED

October 16, UM 1886 Wapiti Solar LLC, Complainant vs. Portland General Electric Company, Defendant

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1832

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

DUKE ENERGY S RESPONSE TO SELC PETITIONERS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:09-cv WWC -MCC Document 607 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT

Bret J. Danow. Partner New York p Practices. Industries. Recognition. Advisories. Articles.

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 515 Filed 02/07/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 485 Filed 02/04/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

5-Day Jump Start in Dialectical Behavior Therapy

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Upper Marlboro, Maryland Policy No. BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY

Minnesota State Board of Assessors

5-Day Jump Start in Dialectical Behavior Therapy

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. INSTRADENT USA, INC. Petitioner

2013 Annual Symposium

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT HEARINGS BEFORE HEARING EXAMINER

Peer-to-Peer 2018 Teacher Training Application & Agreement

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMIISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-100, SUB 113 BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION

Family-to-Family 2019 Teacher Training Application & Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION II CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CI-00159

IN OUR OWN VOICE 2018 Training Application

Advanced Topics in DBT: The Art of Moving from Conceptualization to Exposure for Emotional Avoidance

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Purpose: Policy: The Fair Hearing Plan is not applicable to mid-level providers. Grounds for a Hearing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW APPEALS BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS

Action Planning. Training Guidelines and Procedures. Training Etiquette and Philosophy

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/06/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2015

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

participating in a court proceeding, cannot be guaranteed due process of law or

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Portland General Electric Company ) Docket No.

I write this letter on behalf of AOMA Graduate School of Integrative. Medicine (AOMA). AOMA has sustained operations in the state of Texas since

City of Carson 701 E. Carson St., Carson, CA Telephone: (310) ; ci.carson.ca.us

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RANDALL WAYNE REIFFENSTEIN

Case 5:15-cv BLF Document Filed 05/01/17 Page 1 of 6

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

Paper Entered: April 16, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

5-Day Jump Start in Dialectical Behavior Therapy

Return Date: February 27, 2002

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

L L p lax PacifiCorp s Cross-Examination Statement and Proposed Order of Witnesses Docket UE 170

This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB. In re JJ206, LLC, dba JuJu Joints

A. Concentrated Omega-3 Dietary Supplements Provide Recognized Health Benefits

FACILITATOR TRAINING. TO REGISTER See pages 2-7 for more information and to register

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before KASOLD, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No DR SCT

PlainSite. Legal Document

Paper Date: November 19, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

DELTA DENTAL PREMIER

Exhibit 2 RFQ Engagement Letter

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Third Seminar on Bad Faith TM Filings. Ignacio de Medrano Caballero, OHIM TM5, Tokyo, 1 March 2016

CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURES

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 121/12 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) September 12, 2012

Act 443 of 2009 House Bill 1379

U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv KAJ

Case KG Doc 501 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Rules of Procedure for Screening and Hearing Meetings

PHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Judicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo

State Office of Administrative Hearings '' Cathleen Parsley )> Chief Administrative Law Judge. April II, 2011

Proposed Revisions to the Procedure for Adjusting Grievances

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

In The Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PUBLIC HOUSING: THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Sound & Vibration Measurement Seminar

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2015

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA

Transcription:

Proceeding 92064167 Party Correspondence Address Submission Filer's Name Filer's e-mail Signature Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA770175 Filing date: 09/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Defendant Marsha M. Linehan MARSHA M LINEHAN 3935 UNIVERSITY WAY NE SEATTLE, WA 98105 UNITED STATES Motion to Consolidate Jeffrey A Nelson jnelson@cairncross.com, trademark@cairncross.com /Jeffrey A Nelson/ Date 09/12/2016 Attachments Linehan - Motion to Consolidate.pdf(36357 bytes )

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Mental Health Systems, P.C., Lane Pederson & Associates, LLC, Cognitive and Behavioral Specialities d/b/a Dialectical Behavior Therapy National Certification et al Opposers, Opposition No.: 91228489 Application Serial No.: 86539349 Mark: DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY v. Dr. Marsha Linehan Applicant. Mental Health Systems, P.C., Lane Pederson & Associates, LLC; Lane Pederson, individually; and Cognitive and Behavioral Specialties d/b/a Dialectical Behavior Therapy National Certification and Accreditation Association, Cancellation No.: 92064167 Registration No.: 4,204,315 Mark: DBT Petitioners, v. Dr. Marsha Linehan Respondent. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE OPPOSITION AND CANCELLATION PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), Applicant/Respondent, Dr. Marsha Linehan ( Dr. Linehan ) moves to consolidate of Trademark Opposition No. 91228489, filed by Mental Health Systems, P.C.; Lane Pederson & Associates, LLC; and Cognitive and Behavioral Specialties d/b/a Dialectical Behavior Therapy National Certification and Accreditation Association ( Opposers ), and Trademark Cancellation No. 92064167, filed by Mental Health Systems, {03176198.DOC;2 }

P.C., Lane Pederson & Associates, LLC; Lane Pederson, individually; and Cognitive and Behavioral Specialties d/b/a Dialectical Behavior Therapy National Certification and Accreditation Association ( Petitioners ) (together, the Proceedings ). The Proceedings involve identical marks, nearly identical parties, and substantially identical arguments against Dr. Linehan s registration of two of her trademarks, DBT and DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY, and cancellation of two registrations owned by one of the Opposers/Petitioners. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Dr. Linehan owns Registration No. 4204315 for the mark DBT which was registered on September 11, 2012, for use with educational services in Class 41, research and development services in Class 42, and psychotherapy services in Class 44. Dr. Linehan also filed application Serial No. 86539349 for the mark DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY for use with educational services in Class 41. Cognitive and Behavioral Specialities ( C&BS ) is the owner of Registration No. 4099711 for the mark DBTNCAA which was registered February 14, 2012, as well as Registration No. 4214437 for the mark shown below, which was registered on September 25, 2012 (collectively, the C&BS Marks ). On June 16, 2016, Opposers filed Opposition No. 91228489 against Serial No. 86539349 for the mark DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY based on the C&BS Marks. Then, on July 25, 2016, Petitioners, which include each of the Opposers and Lane Pederson, an individual and member of one or more of the Opposers, filed Cancellation No. 92064167 against Respondent s Registration No. 4204315 for the mark DBT. The Cancellation is also based upon the C&BS Marks. On July 26, 2016, Applicant filed its Answer to Opposition No. 91228489 as {03176198.DOC;2 } - 2 -

well as a Counterclaim to cancel the C&BS Marks. Then, on August 22, 2016, Petitioners filed their Answer to Applicant s Counterclaim. On September 12, 2016, Respondent filed its Answer to Cancellation No. 92064167 simultaneously with this Motion. In both of the Proceedings, the discovery period has not yet opened. ARGUMENT When actions before the board involve common questions of law and fact, the Board may consolidate the actions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2); TBMP 511. The Board weighs several factors in deciding to consolidate proceedings, including the savings of time, effort, and expense, and any prejudice or inconvenience that may result. Dating DNA LLC v. Imagini Holdings Ltd., 94 USPQ2d 1889, 1893 (TTAB 2010), Regatta Sport Ltd. V. Telux-Pioneer Inc., 20 USPQ2d 1154 (TTAB 1991); Estate of Biro v. Big Corp., 18 USPQ2d 1382 (TTAB 1991); Bigfoot 4x4 Inc. v. Bear Foot Inc., 5 USPQ2d 1444 (TTAB 1987). The Board may also consider whether the parties in each action are identical, but identity of parties is not necessary. New Orleans Louisiana Saints LLC v. Who Dat? Inc., 99 USPQ2d 1550, 1552 (TTAB 2011). Here, the Opposition and Cancellation involve effectively identical questions of law and fact. In each action, the questions before the Board relate to whether Dr. Linehan s marks are descriptive, generic, or were abandoned, and whether Dr. Linehan enjoys priority over the C&BS Marks. The marks involved in both Proceedings are the same and the parties are nearly identical only an individual, Lane Pederson, was named as a Petitioner but not an Opposer (and he is a member of at least one of the named Opposers). Given that the questions of fact and law before the Board are identical, or nearly so, consolidation will save the parties and the Board considerable time, effort and expense. {03176198.DOC;2 } - 3 -

Moreover, since the Proceedings have not yet reached the discovery period, there will be no prejudice to any party by consolidating the two actions. WHEREFORE, Dr. Linehan respectfully requests that the Board grant this Motion, consolidate the Proceedings, and issue a new joint scheduling order to reflect the consolidation. Dated: September 12, 2016 Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey A. Nelson Cairncross & Hempelmann 524 2 nd Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104 Attorneys for Dr. Linehan CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document is being served upon Petitioners counsel, Marsha Stolt, Moss & Barnett, PA, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, this 12 th day of September, 2016, by First Class Mail, postage prepaid. Jeffrey A. Nelson {03176198.DOC;2 } - 4 -