Source: Aggie Meats. Prepared by: Cara-Lee Haughton PWF Carcass Committee (March 2006) 1

Similar documents
26 Specifications and Grading Systems for Beef: Japan, USA, Korea and Australia

Carcass Terminology. Goal (learning objective) Supplies. Pre-lesson preparation. Lesson directions and outline

BEEF QUALITY AND YIELD GRADING D. R. ZoBell, D. Whittier, and Lyle Holmgren

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Beef Grading. Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach

MEATS EVALUATION & TECHNOLOGY

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the United States Standards for Grades of

2016 Commercial Steer Study Guide

Why Meat Judging? Assuring Quality Care for Animals Signature Program In-Service Lyda G. Garcia, PhD 9 November 2015

2019 Commercial Steer Study Guide

IMPLANT EFFECTS ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND MEAT QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY DIET

Growth and Characterization of Individual Backfat Layers and Their Relationship to Pork Carcass Quality

THE EFFECT OF BREED GROUP AND AGE AT FEEDING ON BEEF CARCASS COMPOSITION

Frame Size and Market-Ready Weights

Feeding to MAXIMIZE Your Grid

2011 North Dakota State Meat CDE Written Test

Relationship Between Carcass End Points and USDA Marbling Quality Grades: A Progress Report

(Key Words: Implants, Holstein, Tenderness, Yields, Beef.)

Pr oject Summar y. Cataloging Beef Muscles A Review of Muscle Specific Research from Fed and Non-fed Cattle

Phenotypic Characterization of Rambouillet Sheep Expressing the Callipyge Gene: II. Carcass Characteristics and Retail Yield 1

EFFECTS OF VITAMINS AND MINERAL PROTEINATES ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND PORK QUALITY IN FINISHING PIGS

Authors: Key Words: Vitamin E, Vitamin D 3, Shelf-Life, Tenderness, Beef Color

Body Composition and Sensory Characteristics of Pork from CLA-Fed Pigs

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

SUPPLEMENTAL VITAMIN D 3 AND BEEF TENDERNESS

By Neal Smith Extension Area Specialist 4-H

Consumer Preference for Pork Quality

Live Animal Evaluation Using Linear Measurement Produced by Laurel Hoffman

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

Quality and Composition of Beef from Cattle Fed Combinations of Steam-flaked Corn, Dry-rolled Corn, and Distiller's Grains with Solubles

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL VITAMIN D 3 ON MEAT TENDERNESS 1

UTILIZATION OF VIDEO IMAGE ANALYSIS IN PREDICTING BEEF CARCASS LEAN PRODUCT YIELDS

The Effect of a Wheat Gluten Supplement In a Steer Fattening Ration Comprised of Varying Levels of Wheat

The Use of Distiller s Grains By-products in Livestock and Poultry Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

INTERACTIVE EFFECTS BETWEEN PAYLEAN (RACTOPAMINE HCl) AND DIETARY L-CARNITINE ON FINISHING PIG GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS

By Neal Smith Extension Area Specialist 4-H

EFFECTS OF COMBINATION ANABOLIC IMPLANTS ON BOXED- BEEF YIELDS OF SERIALLY SLAUGHTERED STEERS

Ethanol Co-products Beef Quality Implications

Jennifer Aalhus, Agriculture and Agri food of Canada

ESTIMATION OF BEEF CARCASS CUTABILITY USING VIDEO IMAGE ANALYSIS, TOTAL BODY ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OR YIELD GRADE

Project Summary. Improving the Quality of the Beef Round: What is the Role of Electrical Stimulation?

Meat Standards Australia (MSA), an eating quality

tips&toolsp Using the MSA Index to optimise beef eating quality MEAT STANDARDS AUSTRALIA What is the MSA Index? Key points

Lamb Meating Consumer Expectations Dave Pethick, Sheep CRC & Murdoch University

Changing the carcass size, shape and value of sheep

Can We Allow a Calf to Have a Bad Day? Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

INFLUENCE OF DIETARY NIACIN ON FINISHING PIG PERFORMANCE AND MEAT QUALITY

nutrition, vitamin levels in other ingredients and level of metabolic precursors in the diet. Summary

FACTORS INFLUENCING INTERMUSCULAR FAT DEPOSITION IN THE BEEF CHUCK

Grain fed beef is sourced from cattle that have been fed on a nutritionally balanced, high energy ration for a minimum specified number of days.

Consumer Attitudes Towards Color and Marbling of Fresh Pork

Predicting Tenderness in Beef Carcasses by Combining Ultrasound and Mechanical Techniques

Meat Quality; F t a / t/ M arbling

Pork Evaluation. Convergent Ag Media, LLC

The effects of corn silage feeding level on steer growth performance, feed intake and carcass composition.

Achieving Export Quality Pork

Comparison of growth rates in the tissues of primal cuts of Canadian composites

ph as a Predictor of Flavor, Juiciness, Tenderness and Texture in Pork from Pigs in a Niche Market System

Comparison of Hormel Amino Acid Premix with Hormel 543NL Swine Premix

Body Condition Scoring Your Cow Herd

Effects of Ractopamine and Carnitine in Diets Containing 5% Fat for Finishing Pigs

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Swine nutrition and management systems that alter productivity and carcass traits

Senepol Cattle and Grass Fed Beef. Allen Williams, Ph.D., PAS Tallgrass Beef Company

Nutritional effects 011 carcass quality Darryl Gibb, 1997

Changes in the composition of red meat

To Market. To Market. Contents:

Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science

Marbling and Pork Tenderness

L. A. Kinman, D. L. VanOverbeke, C. R. Richards, R. B. Hicks and J. W. Dillwith STORY IN BRIEF

Benefits and Limitations of Using DDGS in Swine Diets

Lamb Meating Consumer Expectations. Hamish Chandler Genetics Program Manager MLA

A Summary of Iowa Cattle Market Data

Centralized Ultrasound Processing to Develop Carcass EPD s

Health of Finishing Steers: Effects on Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Tenderness

MUSCLE STRUCTURE AND WATER RETENTION IN FRESH AND COOKED MEAT PRODUCTS

The Right Lamb Every Time Matt McDonagh Dave Pethick and Kelly Pearce Murdoch Uni & Sheep CRC

Sheep Updates Sheepmeat eating quality - affects of animal age, finishing and processing

POTATO CO-PRODUCT IN DIETS FOR GROWING

Beef Checkoff Funded Nutrient Database Improvement Research Frequently Asked Questions

MEATS EVALUATION AND TECHNOLOGY Updated 3/17/14

C. N. Groesbeck, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, S. S. Dritz 2, J. L. Nelssen, J. M. DeRouchey, B. W. James, T. P. Keegan, and K. R.

Breed Differences and Heterosis Effects for Carcass and Meat Palatability Traits in an Angus-Brahman Multibreed Cattle Population

National Consumer Beef Study

The Right Lamb - Every time

The Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention

Grower-Finisher Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Pigs Fed Genetically Modified Bt Corn

Lecture 10: Sheep meat eating quality

GROWTH OF MUSCLE AND FAT IN BEEF STEERS FROM 6 TO 36 MONTHS OF AGE 1. R. L. HINER AND J. BOND U. S. Department o] Agriculture 2

The effects of grade, gender, and postmortem treatment on beef. I. Composition, cutability, and meat quality

EFFECTS OF BREED OF SIRE AND AGE-SEASON OF FEEDING ON MUSCLE TENDERNESS IN THE BEEF CHUCK

Dr. Jerry Shurson, Dr. Guowu Xu, Dr. Sam Baidoo, and Dr.Lee Johnston. University of Minnesota

Dr. Jerry Shurson. Department of Animal Science

THE EFFECT OF OPTAFLEXX ON GROWTH, PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS TRAITS OF CALF-FED HOLSTEIN STEERS FED TO HARVEST A SUMMARY OF FOUR POST-APPROVED STUDIES

Genetic Correlations of Fatty Acid Concentrations with Carcass Traits in Angus-Sired Beef Cattle

A FUTURE FOR BEEF. Vivion Tarrant AMSA - RMC University of Kentucky, Lexington

The effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on carcass cutability, tenderness, and sensory characteristics of calf-fed Holstein steers

*LX EDWARD ALBERT LUGO, MASTER'S THESIS. fulfillment of the. submitted in partial. requirements for the degree MASTER OP SCIENCE

Initial Evaluation of a Model to Describe the Compositional Growth of Pigs Fed Paylean 1

Transcription:

Source: Aggie Meats Prepared by: Cara-Lee Haughton PWF Carcass Committee (March 2006) 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Beef Carcass Judging s Purpose 2 Canadian Beef Quality Grades...3 Steps to Evaluating Beef Carcasses 4 Beef Carcass Diagrams...5 Marbling...7 Lean Meat Yield...8 Weight...9 Fat Distribution 9 Fat Color...9 Judging Card Example..10-1- 2

PURPOSE OF BEEF CARCASS JUDGING Carcass judging is used to evaluate the meat quality of a beef animal through both quantitative and qualitative properties based on industry standards. Qualitative: 1. Maturity the age of the animal where the age affects the tenderness 2. Marbling the intramuscular fat streaks within the meat 3. Meat Color the degree of redness of the meat which affects consumer acceptability 4. Quality Grade determined by the degree of marbling in the meat 5. Sex Male or female- where the pronounced masculinity affects the meat color and palatability Quantitative 1. Fat thickness the average amount of fat covering the carcass; too much fat equals waste 2. Rib Eye Area the area should be an average size, but not too big for the consumer; the retail cut yield increases as the rib eye area increases 3. Lean Meat Yield an estimation of the percentage of the carcass that is red meat 4. Fat Color should be firm white to an amber color -2-3

PURPOSE OF GRADING Grading is intended to place carcasses into uniform groups of similar quality, yield, and value, in order to facilitate marketing and production decisions Grading may be used as a basis for producer settlement Grading attempts to ensure that consumers have an improved product through greater consistency and predictability in the eating quality of specific grades of beef Grading is not mandatory (Canadian Beef Grading Agency, 2005) Grade CANADA PRIME CANADA A, AA, AAA Maturity (Age) Youthful Youthful CANADIAN BEEF QUALITY GRADES (Canadian Beef Grading Agency, 2005) Muscling Good to excellent with some deficiencies Good to excellent with some deficiencies B1 Youthful Good to excellent with some deficiencies B2 Youthful Deficient to excellent B3 Youthful Deficient to good B4 Youthful Deficient to excellent Rib Eye Muscle Firm, bright red Firm, bright red Firm, bright red Bright red Bright red Dark red D1 Mature Excellent D2 Mature Medium to excellent D3 Mature Deficient D4 Mature Deficient to excellent E Youthful or mature Pronounced masculinity Marbling Slightly abundant A- trace AA - slight AAA - small Fat Colour and Texture Firm, white or amber Firm, white or amber Firm, white or amber Yellow White or amber Firm, white or amber White to yellow Fat Measure 7-8 mm 7-8 mm Less than 2 mm Less than 15 mm Less than 15 mm Less than 15 mm 15 mm or more 4-3-

STEPS TO EVALUATING A BEEF CARCASS For the purposes at the Provincial Winter Fair 4-H Beef Carcass Judging Competition, only a few of the grading characteristics will be considered: a) Marbling b) Lean Meat Yield c) Average Fat Thickness d) Weight e) Fat Distribution f) Fat Color As in any other judging class, you first look and analyze the entire class as a whole then focus on the individual carcasses characteristics. 1. First look at the marbling (fat streaks) within the rib eye to determine the approximate marbling grade: Trace (A), Slight (AA), Small (AAA), Slightly Abundant (Prime). 2. Estimate the yield grade from the amount of red meat in the rib eye compared to the size of the red eye 3. Compare the average fat thicknesses around the rib eye 4. Compare the weights of the carcasses to judge if they are too heavy or too light 5. Compare the distribution of the fat throughout the carcass making sure the shoulder and hip are not bare 6. Look at the color of the fat on the carcasses to determine if its white or amber -4-5

PICTURE OF A BEEF CARCASS Source: ACES Publications http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/h/he-0418/ -5-6

PICTURE OF BEEF WHOLESALE CUTS Source: Fabrication of Beef, (2006) http://labs.ansci.uiuc.edu/meatscience/library/beef%20fabrication.htm -6-7

MARBLING Marbling is the flecks of intramuscular fat distributed in the muscle tissue. The extent or degree of marbling is the primary determinant of the quality grade. To assess marbling, one looks at the rib eye between the 12 th & 13 th ribs (Utah State University, 2005). The assessment of marbling is based on the average amount, size and distribution of fat particles or deposits in the rib eye. Meat marbling affects the eating quality of beef for juiciness, flavour, and tenderness (Canadian Beef Grading Agency, 2005). The quality grads Canada A grades differ by amount of marbling in the meat, an assessment done by the Canadian Beef Grading Agency. Canadian beef carcass quality grading utilizes four levels of marbling: TRACE, SLIGHT, SMALL, and SLIGHTLY ABUNDANT: Prime Slightly Abundant AAA Small AA Slight A Trace Source: Beef Information Centre, (2006) http://www.beefinfo.org/marbling.cfm The Federal Government, based on the recommendations from the Canadian Beef Industry, sets the beef grading standards. Source: Canadian Beef Grading Agency, (2005) -7-8

LEAN MEAT YIELD The yield is an estimation of the percentage of the carcass that is red meat (Canadian Beef Grading Agency, 2005). Yield is determined by measuring exterior fat thickness as well as the length and width of the rib eye muscle (Beef Information Center, 2006). Only Canada A grade carcasses are assessed for a lean meat yield class. When the yield class is determined, the yield class is stamped in red ink on the short loin and rib sections of each side of the carcass (Beef Information Center, 2006). There are three yield classes. 59% or more of lean, useable meat 54-58% of lean, useable meat 53% or less of lean, useable meat Source: Beef Information Center (2006) http://www.beefinfo.org/specs_grading.cfm The method the grader uses to estimate lean yield was developed by the Lacombe Research Station and implemented in 1992. The ruler was revised in 2001 to accommodate changes to the reduction in minimum back fat required. Source: Canadian Beef Grading Agency (2005) http://www.beefgradingagency.ca/yield.html (t actual size) To determine the yield grade, the ruler is applied to the surface that is exposed between the 12 th & 13 th rib by measuring: 1. Length maximum length, 2. Width Maximum width & generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, 3. Fat Class Minimum point of thickness &perpendicular to the outside surface Marbling (Fat Streaks) Source: Canadian Beef Grading Agency (2005) -8-9

WEIGHT The weight of a beef carcass includes bone, muscle and fat. An ideal weight should provide an ideal yield with the smallest amount of waste including excess fat. CARCASS WEIGHT PWF AWARDED POINTS <700 lbs 0 700 lbs 724 lbs 2 725 lbs 749 lbs 3 750 lbs 774 lbs 4 775 lbs 799 lbs 6 800 lbs 925 lbs 10 926 lbs 999 lbs 8 1000-1050 lbs 4 >1050 lbs 0 FAT DISTRIBUTION A small layer of fat should lightly cover the carcass, no more than 7-8 mm at both ends. There should be no bare spots at either end or excess fat on the carcass. Light Cover- (7-8 mm) at both ends Excellent Bare at one end of the carcass (hip or shoulder) Good Bare at both ends of carcass (hip or shoulder) Marginal Excess fat cover (Waste) Poor Under 2 mm fat thickness Rejected to a B grade FAT COLOR Beef carcasses should exhibit white and firm fat. Although fat somewhat focuses on consumer acceptance, fat texture influences cooking results and flavour. te: The roughage fed to the beef animal sometimes affects fat color. To determine the fat color, examine the carcasses fat cover s color. -9-10

JUDGING CARD EXAMPLE BEEF CARCASS JUDGING CARD COMPETITOR # PLACING: PLACING SCORE: REASON SCORE: TOTAL SCORE: REASONS FAT COLOR AVG FAT THICKNESS WEIGHT FAT DISTRI- BUTION MARBLING LEAN MEAT YIELD SCORE (Mark 3 OVER reasons) (Mark 3 OVER reasons) (Mark 3 OVER reasons) (Mark 1 LAST reason) (Reason why place last) TOTAL INTERPRETATION 1. Fat color White Excellent Amber Acceptable Yellow Rejected 2. Avg. Fat Thickness Ideal 7-8 mm Minimum 2 mm (<2 B Grade) Maximum 14 mm 3. Dressed Weight Ideal 800 lbs 925 lbs Minimum 700lbs (<700 lbs Really Under finished) Maximum 1050lbs (> 1050 lbs Greater Waste and Over finished) 4. Fat Distribution Light Cover- (7-8 mm) at both ends Excellent Bare at one end of the carcass Good Bare at both ends of carcass Marginal Excess fat cover (Waste) Poor Under 2 mm fat thickness Rejected to a B grade 5. Marbling Slightly Abundant Prime Small AAA Slight AA Trace A 6. Lean Meat Yield A1-- >58 % A2 54-58 % A3 -- < 54 % -10-11 1. Mark 3 reasons for why you are putting one over another 2. On the last one, mark the reason why you are putting it last (ie lack of marbling

BIBLIOGRAPHY Beef Information Center (2006). Beef Cuts & Grading. Retrieved February 14, 2006. http://www.beefinfo.org/specs_grading.cfm Canadian Beef Grading Agency (2005). Grades, Yields and Charting. Retrieved February 21, 2006. http://www.telusplanet.net/public/cbga2/ Meat Science on the Web (2006). Fabrication of Beef. Retrieved March 6, 2006. http://labs.ansci.uiuc.edu/meatscience/library/beef%20fabrication.htm ACES Publications (2006). Beef Cuts Retrieved March 6, 2006. http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/h/he-0418/ Aggie Meats (2005). Beef Carcass Photo. Retrieved March 6, 2006. http://aggiemeat.tamu.edu/judging/beef%20carcass%20class/allsides.html Utah State University (January 2005). Beef Quality & Yield Grading. Retrieved February 10, 2006. http://extension.usu.edu/files/factsheets/beef3.pdf 12

13