IN SITU RUMEN DEGRADATION KINETICS OF FOUR SORGHUM VARIETIES IN NILI RAVI BUFFALOES ABSTRACT

Similar documents
EFFECT OF MOLASSES AND CORN AS SILAGE ADDITIVES ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTT DWARF ELEPHANT GRASS SILAGE AT DIFFERENT FERMENTATION PERIODS

Abstract. Keywords: Tropical grasses, Degradability, Nutrient, Rumen fermentation. Introduction. Chaowarit Mapato a* and Metha Wanapat a

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

Ruminal degradability of neutral detergent insoluble protein of selected protein sources

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

Effect Of Dietary Incorporation Of Ksheerabala Residue On Dry Matter Intake And Nutrient Digestibility In Crossbred Calves

ISSN: T. Nasir A., M. Sarwar, F. Ahmad, M. A. Tipu and I. Hussain

P. Namanee, S. Kuprasert and W. Ngampongsai. Abstract

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

Fibre is complicated! NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports NDF. Review. NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin

The Effect of Maturity and Frost Killing of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration

EFFECT OF LEVELS OF LUCERNE STRAW IN TOTAL MIXED RATION ON NUTRIENT INTAKE AND DIGESTIBILITY IN BULLOCKS

BENCHMARKING FORAGE NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY. R. D. Shaver, Ph.D., PAS

RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER

Composition and Nutritive Value of Corn Fractions and Ethanol Co-products Resulting from a New Dry-milling Process 1

Nonstructural and Structural Carbohydrates in Dairy Cattle Rations 1

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 6, 2016,

Why is forage digestibility important?

MICROBIAL INOCULANT EFFECTS ON IN SITU RUMINAL DRY MATTER AND NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER DISAPPEARANCE OF CORN SILAGE

EFFECT OF RYEGRASS SILAGE DRY MATTER CONTENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS

Effect of Roughage Sources and Fibrolytic Enzyme Supplementation on Nutrient Digestion and Rumen Fermentation in Buffaloes

Reducing the reliance on purchased protein. Improving the value of home grown proteins

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

PERFORMANCE OF DAIRY CATTLE FED SPECIALTY CORN HYBRIDS Shawn S. Donkin, Ph.D. Animal Sciences Department, Purdue University

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Nutritive Value of Feeds

Nutritional evaluation of Erianthus spp., Saccharum spontaneum, and Saccharum spp. hybrids as feed

Title. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. File Information THE RUMEN DEGRADABILITY OF PROTEIN FOR VARIOUS FEEDS.

Update on Corn Shredlage for Dairy Cows

The Use of Apple Pomace in Rice Straw Based Diets of Korean Native Goats (Capra hircus)

Measuring detergent fibre and insoluble protein in corn silage using crucibles or filter bags

IN SACCO DEGRADABILITY OF WHEAT STRAW TREATED WITH UREA AND FIBROLYTIC ENZYMES

MOLASSES AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTATION OF AMMONIATED HAY FOR YEARLING CATTLE

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

SUBSTITUTING STEAM-FLAKED CORN WITH DISTILLER S GRAINS ALTERS RUMINAL FERMENTATION AND DIET DIGESTIBILITY

Sheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis

In Vitro Digestibility of Forages

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

Quick Start. Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Sheep

Protein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1

Defining Forage Quality 1

ID # EFFECTT OF SUPPLEMENTS ON FORAGE DEGRADABILITY OF Brachiaria. brizantha cv. Marandu GRAZED BY STEERS *

Implementing the Corn Silage Trial Results on Your Farm. Dr. Jessica Williamson, Penn State Joe Lawrence, Cornell CALS PRO-DAIRY

Effects of a sequential offer of hay and TMR on feeding and rumination behaviour of dairy cows

Silage for beef cattle 2018 CONFERENCE. sponsored by: LALLEMAND ANIMAL NUTRITION

Silage from Agricultural By-products in Thailand: Processing and Storage

Current strategies to increase nutritive value of corn silage. Luiz Ferraretto 1 and Randy Shaver 2

Formulating Lactating Cow Diets for Carbohydrates

Introduction. Use of undf240 as a benchmarking tool. Relationships between undigested and physically effective fiber in lactating dairy cows

The Effect of Heat Treatment of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration

C hewing and ruminating with

EFFECT OF INCREASING DIETARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON INTAKE, DIGESTION, AND RUMINAL FERMENTATION IN LIMIT-FED STEERS

AREC Brown Mid-rib and Photoperiod-Sensitive Forage Sorghums

Using Feed Analysis to Troubleshoot Nutritional Problems in Dairy Herds 1

Production Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion

Results of UW Madison Corn Shredlage Feeding Trial

Potential of Some Browse Plants For Ruminants In Hot Humid Environment of Lafia. *Barde, R. E., Abimiku, H. K., Hassan, D.I and Maiangwa, A.

Effect of Feeding Dried Distiller s Grains Plus Solubles on Milk Yield and its Composition in Dairy Cattle

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF AWASSI LAMBS FATTENING SYSTEMS IN PALESTINE.

Applied Beef Nutrition Ration Formulation Short Course. Beef Ration and Nutrition Decision Software

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY. Authors:

Reference methods for assessing rumen degradation characteristics of nutreints

Supplement Types - Energy. ME Fixed? What is Metabolisable Energy? Feeding Supplements & Practical Ration Balancing. Dr Julian Waters 3/1/16

Fiber for Dairy Cows

TRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT. J.E. Shirley

Protein requirements of beef cattle fed palm oil by-products in the South-Thailand

Practically improving the feeding value of your maize silage for livestock and AD

ABSTRACT FORAGE SAMPLING AND TESTING ACCURACY CHOOSING A FORAGE TESTING LAB

Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective

Feeding Strategies When Alfalfa Supplies are Short

HAY QUALITY EVALUATION

ALMLM HAY QUALITY: TERMS AND DEFIN"IONS

FIBER DIGESTIBILITY AND FORAGE FRAGILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE. K. Cotanch and R. Grant William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY

2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania

How Fiber Digestibility Affects Forage Quality and Milk Production

Using dietary crude protein to manipulate energy balance in early lactation dairy cows

S. Y. Lee, W. Y. Kim 1, J. Y. Ko 2 and J. K. Ha* School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Suweon , Korea

Fiber Digestibility & Corn Silage Evaluation. Joe Lawrence Cornell University PRO-DAIRY

Fundamentals of Ration Balancing for Beef Cattle Part II: Nutrient Terminology

Gut Fill Revisited. Lawrence R. Jones 1 and Joanne Siciliano-Jones 2 1. American Farm Products, Inc. 2. FARME Institute, Inc. Introduction.

Starch digestibility in dairy cows how do we handle starch in ration evaluation systems?

Dr. Dan Undersander Professor of Agronomy University of Wisconsin

PERFORMANCE OF CALVES FED WITH HAY, SILAGE AND BROWSE PLANT AS FEED SUPPLEMENT DURING THE DRY SEASON

ADJUSTING NET ENERGY VALUES OF FEEDS FED TO DAIRY COWS

Forage Testing and Supplementation

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

The Diploma in Ruminant Nutrition

Effects of Increased Inclusion of Algae Meal on Lamb Total Tract Digestibility

Established Facts. Impact of Post Harvest Forage on the Rumen Function. Known Facts. Known Facts

As Sampled Basis nutrient results for the sample in its natural state including the water. Also known as as fed or as received.

NUTRIETIVE EVAULATION AND IN-SITU DIGESTIBILITY OF IRRIGATED GRASSES ABSTRACT

IN SITU DEGRADABILITY OF HAND HARVESTED OR EXTRUSA SAMPLES OF. TANZANIA GRASS (PANICUM MAXIMUM, Jacq.) Kronka 2. Abstract

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

The Nutritionist 2019

NEW/EMERGING MEASUREMENTS FOR FORAGE QUALITY. Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

SHREDLAGE IN DAIRY CATTLE RATIONS. L. E. Chase Cornell University

Transcription:

Nawaz et al., The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26(2): 2016, Page: J. 355-359 Anim. Plant Sci. 26(2):2016 ISSN: 1018-7081 IN SITU RUMEN DEGRADATION KINETICS OF FOUR SORGHUM VARIETIES IN NILI RAVI BUFFALOES H. Nawaz, U. Ashfaq, M. Ali and M. S. Rehman Institute of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan Correspondence to: Mubarak Ali, E-mail address:drmubarak434@gmail.com ABSTRACT Different sorghum varieties are introduced in practice to ensure the provision of good quality fodder for ruminants. Limited information is available on in situ rumen degradation characteristics of dietary nutrients of sorghum varieties. This study was planned to evaluate the chemical composition and in situ rumen degradation kinetics of four sorghum varieties in Nili Ravi bulls. Four sorghum varieties (Viejin 4003, Viejin 4005, Viejin 4006 and Viejin 4571) were harvested at 80 th day after sowing. Samples of fresh fodders were taken and used for the determination of chemical composition. These sorghum varieties were evaluated using in situ nylon bag technique. The fresh samples were filled in nylon bags and incubated in the rumen of four rumen cannulated buffalo bulls for 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h. Rumen incubated residues were analyzed for dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Chemical analysis showed that the crude protein and ADF contents were found higher (P<0.05) for Viejin 4003 compared to other varieties, whereas, the higher values of NDF and hemicellulose contents were found for Viejin 4005. Results showed that significant (P<0.05) higher effective rumen degradation (ED) and extent of degradation of DM were found for Viejin 4571. The extent of degradation and ED of NDF and ADF were found higher (P<0.05) for Viejin 4006 variety compared to other varieties. It is concluded that Viejin 4006 variety has the good nutritive profile and better values for rumen degradation characteristics compared to other varieties. Keywords: Sorghum varieties, rumen degradation kinetics, effective rumen degradation, buffalo bulls. INTRODUCTION Feed is an integral part of livestock farming which contributes about 60-70% in cost of production. The nutrient availability for ruminant animals is greatly hampered due to non-availability of land for fodder production resulting from their competition with cash crops as well as increasing demand of cereal grains as food for human consumption (Raghuvansi et al., 2007). From available feed resources, livestock sector in Pakistan is getting about 62% of crude protein and 74% of total digestible nutrients (Sarwar et al., 2002). Manipulation of excessive fodder can fill the gap between supply and demand for livestock. The agricultural economy of developing countries is greatly aided by utilizing fodder crops as least cost source of nutrients for livestock. In Pakistan, livestock is primarily raised on seasonal fodders and range lands, generally having high fiber contents, lower feed intake and digestibility (Khan et al., 2006). It is necessary to ensure the supply of high quality forages for better production and increased profit throughout the year (Garcia et al., 2008). Livestock is getting 89% nutrients from roughages and rest of nutrients from other feed resources. High quality fodders are required for better livestock production. Consequently, the serious constraint in commercial livestock farming is the inadequate supply of good quality fodder in developing countries (Sarwar et al., 2002).In Pakistan, sorghum is the major fodder crop during Kharif season and is grown over a wide range of soil types, providing food grain for humans and forage for livestock. New varieties of sorghum have 5 to 7 tons/acre average yield, less water requirements and better nutritional value that may assist livestock farmers to fulfill the nutrient requirements of animals (Miller and Stroup, 2004). However, limited information is available about nutrient bioavailability from different varieties of sorghum. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the nutritive profile and in situ rumen degradation characteristics of four sorghum varieties (Viejin 4003, Viejin 4005, Viejin 4006 and Viejin 4571). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forage sowing and harvesting: Four different sorghum varieties (Viejin 4003, Viejin 4005, Viejin 4006 and Viejin 4571) were sown at experimental field, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Forage was harvested at day 80 after sowing. Fresh chopped sorghum fodder samples were oven dried at 60ºC for 72 h and ground to 2 mm size. Experimental animals and in situ rumen incubations: The experiment was conducted at Raja Muhammad Akram Animal Nutrition Research Center, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan to determine the 355

chemical composition and in situ rumen degradation kinetics of four sorghum varieties. Four ruminally cannulated Nili Ravi buffalo bulls of approximately the similar age and body weight (average weight 475 kg) were used to evaluate the in situ rumen degradation characteristics. Bulls were housed on a concrete floor in separate pens. Fresh and clean water was made available round the clock. The bulls were fed on the sorghum fodder. The trial consisted of four periods of 11 days each. The first 7 days were allowed for adjustment followed by 4 day incubation period for each variety. The fresh fodder sample was harvested, chopped and then size of fodder particles was 2 mm by Wiley mill. Samples of each sorghum variety (5 g on DM basis) were filled in nylon bags (10 cm 25 cm, pore size 60µm) and incubated in the rumen of three buffalo bulls for 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h. Nine bags of each variety were incubated in the rumen of three bulls for each incubation period (3 bags per bull per incubation period). The bags were placed in the rumen in a reverse order and all the bags were removed at the same time to reduce variation associated with the washing procedure. After removing these bags from the rumen, these bags were washed in running tap water. The 0 h bags were rinsed under tap water without incubation in the rumen.the washed bags were dried in hot air oven at 60 o C for 72 h and dried residues were again ground to 2 mm for chemical analysis. Chemical analysis: The DM content was determined by oven drying the sample at 60 C for 72 h and ash content was determined by incineration at 550 C (AOAC, 2000) for 4 h. The nitrogen (N) was d etermined by Kjeldahl method and CP was calculated as N 6.25 (AOAC, 2000). The NDF was determined by a modified method of Van Soest et al. (1991) with the use of sodium sulfite and expressed with residual ash. The ADF was determined by boiling NDF residue with ADF reagent and expressed with residual ash. Acid detergent lignin (ADL) was determined by boiling ADF residue with sulfuric acid (ISO 13906:2008). Calculations: The degradation rate ( k d), lag time and extent of degradation were calculated using the exponential model of Ørskov and McDonald (1979); Where, is degradation at time t; is potentially degradable fraction in the rumen at time t; L is lag time. The lag time is the initial phase during which either no degradation occurs or it occurs at a greatly reduced rate. Extent of degradation is the part of nutrient degraded in the rumen. The effective rumen degradation (ED) of DM, NDF and ADF was calculated according to the equation of Ørskov and McDonald (1979). The k p value of 0.02 h -1 ) and 0.040 h -1 were used for NDF and ADF of grasses, respectively, based on the results of Pellikaan (2004). The ED DM in the present study were calculated using a k p value of 0.05 h -1. Statistical Analysis: The data collected were analyzed using Analysis of Variance Technique under 4 4 Latin Square Design and means were compared by least significant difference test (Steel et al., 1997). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Chemical composition: Chemical composition of sorghum varieties was significantly (P<0.05) different among all the sorghum varieties (Table 1). The results of current study revealed that the OM content of Viejin 4571 variety was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of other varieties. These results are consistent to the findings of Mahanta and Pachauri (2005). They found that the OM varied among varieties of sorghum. Fadel et al. (2007) also reported that Himaecy variety of sorghum contained higher (P<0.05) OM content than the other varieties of sorghum stover. These differences might be due to the genetic makeup of the varieties. The CP content of Viejin 4003 variety was higher (P<0.05) than that of other varieties. These results are similar to the findings of Mahanta and Pachauri (2005). They reported that CP contents of sorghum varieties varied between the ranges of 5.4 to 8.2%. The results of current study for NDF and ADF are within the ranges reported by Singh et al. (2002) for sorghum varieties. The ash content of Viejin 4006 was found higher (P<0.05) compared to other varieties. Mahanta and Pachauri (2005) also reported that ash contents of sorghum varieties i.e. HC- 135, HD-15 and JS-10 were within the ranges of 5.9 to 9.1%. Dry matter degradation kinetics: The ED, lag time, k d and extent of degradation for DM were significantly differed (P<0.05) among all the sorghum varieties (Table 2). Highest values (P<0.05) of ED, lag time and extent of degradation were observed in Viejin 4571 compared to other varieties whereas, higher k d value was observed for Viejin 4005. The results of present study supported the findings of Fadel et al. (2007) who reported that higher ED value for DM of CR 35-18 and Feterita than the other sorghum varieties. This difference in the ED values of DM might be due to the variation in the NDF and ADF contents. Awad El Kareem et al. (2009) reported different k d values for sorghum varieties. The k d value of CSH-5 was higher (P<0.05) than F eterita cultivar of sorghum. This might be due to the high DM and CP contents of CSH-5. The results of present study showed that the extent of DM degradation was higher (P<0.05) for Viejin 4571 variety compared to other varieties. These results were consistent with the finding of Wedig et al. (1987) who reported higher extent of degradation for brown 356

midrib mutants than normal genotypes of sorghum and Sudan grass hybrids. Contrary to these, Wedig et al. (1987) reported non-significant differences in DM digestibility among the sorghum varieties. Neutral detergent fiber degradation kinetics: The ED, k d and extent of degradation for NDF were significantly different (P<0.05) among all the sorghum varieties. However, non-significant difference (P>0.05) in the lag time was observed among all the varieties (Table 3). The results of present study showed that the higher ED value of NDF for Viejin 4006 due to lower ADL content. The difference in degradation values was probably due to lignification and maturity which interferes the degradation of structural carbohydrates by acting as a physical barrier to rumen microbial enzymes (Moore and Jung, 2001). In contrast to this, Mustafa and Seguin, (2003) observed non-significant difference in NDF degradability among legume-cereal. Similarly, nonsignificant difference in lag time of NDF was reported by Wedig et al. (1987) for different sorghum varieties. Higher k d for Viejin 4006 was found that is contrary to the finding of Aydin et al. (1999), they reported that the rate of NDF degradation were similar among conventional sorghum, bmr-sorghum and corn silage. The results of present study were in agreement with the findings of Oliver et al. (2004). It was reported that extent of NDF degradation was greater for bmr-6 sorghum, bmr-8 sorghum and corn silage compared with the conventional sorghum varieties. Acid detergent fiber degradation kinetics: The ED, k d and extent of degradation for ADF were significantly different (P<0.05) among all the sorghum varieties. However, non-significant differences (P>0.05) in the lag time and k d was observed among all the varieties (Table 4). The results of present study showed that higher ED value of ADF was found for Viejin 4006 sorghum variety than other varieties. These values were in agreement with the values reported by Oliver et al. (2004) that the total tract digestibility of ADF for bmr-6 sorghum was greater than that for bmr-18 sorghum. These findings are contrary to the findings of Wedig et al. (19 87). They reported degradability of ADF was similar in bmr and non-bmr variety of sorghum. The results of current study for lag time and k d also supported the finding of Aydin et al. (1999), they reported that the lag time and degradation rate of ADF were similar among conventional sorghum, bmr sorghum and corn silages. Oliver et al. (2004) observed that extent of degradation of ADF was greater in bmr-6 sorghum than that of bmr-18 and corn silage. Wedig et al. (1987) also reported that extent of degradation was higher for bmr mutants than the normal genotypes of sorghum and Sudan grass hybrid sorghum. Table 1. Chemical compositions of sorghum varieties. Parameters Viejin 4003 Viejin 4571 Viejin 4006 Viejin 4005 SEM Significance Level Organic matter 93.17 c 95.36 a 92.03 d 94.00 b 0.36 Dry matter 18.16 17.16 17.27 17.06 1.13 NS Ash 6.83 b 4.64 d 7.97 a 6.00 c 0.37 Crude protein 7.34 a 6.7 bc 6.77 b 6.64 d 0.08 Neutral detergent fiber 61.50 a 52.00 b 53.83 b 62.17 a 1.38 Acid detergent fiber 31.00 a 24.50 b 23.33 b 30.83 a 1.14 Hemicellulose 29.83 b 27.50 c 30.50 ab 31.33 a 0.46 Acid detergent lignin 5.01 b 5.35 a 3.05 c 3.35 c 0.31 Standard error of mean. Means in same row with different superscripts (a, b, c, d)differ significantly (P<0.05). NS, non-significant;, P<0.05;, P<0.01;, P<0.001. Table 2. Rumen degradation kinetics and effective rumen degradation (ED) of dry ma tter of four sorghum varieties. Parameters Viejin 4003 Viejin 4571 Viejin 4006 Viejin 4005 SEM Significance Level Extent of degradation 50.99 b 51.82 a 49.47 c 47.61 d 0.42 Degradation rate (%/ h) 2.22 b 2.26 b 2.28 b 2.58 a 0.04 Lag time (h) 7.14 a 7.44 a 6.08 b 4.51 c 0.31 ED (%) 65.55 c 71.80 a 69.45 b 65.70 c 0.69 Standard error of mean. Means in same row with different superscripts (a, b, c, d) differ significantly (P<0.05). The ED was calculated by using passage rate (kp) value of 0.05 h -1., P<0.01;, P<0.001. 357

Table 3. Rumen degradation kinetics and effective rumen degradation (ED) of neutral detergent fiber of four sorghum varieties. Parameters Viejin 4003 Viejin 4571 Viejin 4006 Viejin 4005 SEM Significance Level Extent of degradation 44.50 bc 43.57 bc 47.17 a 46.24 ab 0.45 Degradation rate (%/h) 3.31 ab 2.98 b 3.59 a 2.99 b 0.08 Lag time (h) 7.07 7.02 7.37 8.28 0.48 NS ED (%) 59.90 c 67.12 a 67.74 a 61.65 b 0.90 Standard error of mean. Means in same row with different superscripts (a, b, c) differ significantly (P<0.05). The EDNDF was calculated by using passage rate value of 0.020 h -1. NS, non-significant;, P<0.05;, P<0.001. Table 4. Rumen degradation kinetics and effective rumen degradation (ED) of acid detergent f iber of four sorghum varieties. Parameters Viejin 4003 Viejin 4571 Viejin 4006 Viejin 4005 SEM Significance Level Extent of degradation 58.34 c 64.88 b 71.65 a 66.30 b 1.36 Degradation rate (%/h) 5.93 5.54 5.53 5.53 0.55 NS Lag time (h) 4.39 4.47 4.37 4.72 0.36 NS ED (%) 51.57 b 52.40 b 57.22 a 52.79 ab 0.86 Standard error of mean. Means in same row with different superscripts (a, b, c) differ significantly (P<0.05). The EDADF was calculated by using passage rate value of 0.040 h -1. NS, non-significant;, P<0.05;, P<0.01. Conclusion: The results of present study show that Viejin 4006 sorghum variety has the good nutritive profile and better values for rumen degradation kinetics and effective rumen degradability. The Viejin 4006 variety can be used as good forage source to fulfill animal requirements and to obtain optimum animal performance in terms of maintenance, health and production. Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to the laboratory and farm staff of the Institute of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan for providing technical assistance during laboratory and research work. REFERENCES AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. (17 th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Inc., Maryland, U.S.A. Awad El Kareem, A. M., G. Muralikrishna, A. H. El Tinay and A. I. Mustafa (2009). Characterization of tannin and study of in vitro protein digestibility and mineral profile of Sudanese and Indian sorghum cultivars. Pakistan J. Nutr. 8: 469-476. Aydin, G., R. J. Grant and J. O Rear (1999). Brown midrib sorghum in diets for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 2127-2135. Fadel, E. A. M. A., N. I. N. Eldaim and E. O. Amasaib (2007). Chemical composition and in situ dry matter degradability of stover fraction of five sorghum varieties. J. App. Sci. Res. 3: 1141-1145. Garcia, S. C., W. J. Fulkerson and S. U. Brookes (2008). Dry matter production, nutritive value and efficiency of nutrient utilization of a complementary forage rotation compared to a grass pasture system. Grass and Forage Sci. 63: 284-300. ISO 13906 (2008). Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of acid detergent fibre and acid detergent lignin contents. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. Khan, M. A., Z Iqbal, M. Sarwar, M. Nisa, M. S. Khan, W. S. Lee, H. J. Lee and H. S. Kim (2006). Urea treated corn cobs ensiled with or without additives for buffaloes: Ruminal characteristics, digestibility and nitrogen metabolism. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 705-712. Mahanta, S. K. and V. C. Pachauri (2005). Nutritional evaluation of two promising varieties of forage sorghum in sheep fed as silage. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 1715-1720. Miller, F. A. and J. A. Stroup (2004). Growth and management or sorghums for forage production. National Alfalfa Symposium. Monterey, C A. 358

Moore, K. J. and H. G. Jung (2001). Lignin and fiber digestion. J. Range Manage. 54: 420-430. Mustafa, A. F. and P. Seguin (2003). Characteristics and in situ degradability of whole crop faba bean, pea, and soybean silages.can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 793-799. Oliver, A. L., R. J. Grant, J. F. Pendersen, and J. O'Rear (2004). Comparison of brown midrib-6 and -18 forage sorghum with conventional sorghum and corn silage in diets of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 637-644. Ørskov, E. R. and I. McDonald (1979). Estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to the rate of passage. The J. Agric. Sci. 92: 499-503. Pellikaan, W. H. (2004). Passage of 13C-labelled feed components through the digestive tract of dairy cows. PhD-thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Raghuvansi, S. K. S., R. Prasad, A. S. Mishra, O. H. Chaturvedi, M. K. Tripathi, A. K. Misra, B. L. Saraswat and R. C. Jakhmola (2007). Effect of inclusion of tree leaves in feed on nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation in sheep. Biores. Technol. 98: 511-517. Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and Z. Iqbal (2002). Status paper feed resources for livestock in Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4:186-192. Singh, Y., R. S. Jaiswal, M. L. Verma, Y. P. Joshi, and P. Singh (2002). Effect of cutting intervals on forage yield and chemical composition of sorghum varieties. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 19: 390-394. Steel, R. G. D., J. H. Torrie and D. A. Dickey (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometric Approach (3 rd ed.). McGraw Hill Book Comp. Inc. New York, USA. Van Soest, P. J., B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis (1991). Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597. Wedig, C. L., E. H. Jaster, K. J. Moore and N. R. Merchen (1987). Rumen turnover and digestion of normal and brown midrib sorghum Sudangrass hybrid silage in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 1220-1227. 359