Drug-Coated Balloons for Small Coronary Artery Disease: BASKET-SMALL 2

Similar documents
SeQuent Please World Wide Registry

DEB experience in Gachon Universtiy Gil Hospital (in ISR) Soon Yong Suh MD., PhD. Heart Center Gachon University Gil Hospital Seoul, Korea.

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Nine-year clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents for large coronary vessel lesions

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

INTERVENTIONAL VASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPY. SeQuent Please NEO CLINICAL EVIDENCE AND COST / BENEFIT EFFECTIVENESS

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial. Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

The SORT OUT VI Trial

eucalimus - First Experience

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

A Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for Bifurcation Lesions : Early Clinical Observations

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Low Predictive Risk of Mortality

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice

SCAAR: Lower late and very late stent thrombosis rates with new generation drug eluting stents compared to bare metal stents

LM stenting - Cypher

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

Sirolimus Nanocrystal Balloon Based Delivery for Coronary DES ISR

Supplementary appendix

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

Coronary Stent Choice in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE)

DES in Diabetic Patients

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Stent Thrombosis in Bifurcation Stenting

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Conflict of interest :None. Meta-analysis. Zhangwei Chen, MD

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

Clinical Investigations

Bern-Rotterdam Cohort Study

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

Controversies in Cardiac Surgery

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Insight from the CACTUS trial Coronary Bifurcation Application of the Crush

Δημήτριος Αγγοσράς, FETCS

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Biosensors Lunch Symposium

Paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis of angiographic and clinical data

Bioresorbable polymer drug-eluting stents in PCI

TRIAS HR Pilot Study

Randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a biolimus-eluting stent in patients treated with PCI: the SORT OUT VII trial

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

How do I use mechanical debulking for the treatment of arterial occlusions

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Comparison of Angiographic Dissection Patterns Caused by Long vs Short Balloons During Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Femoropopliteal Occlusions

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

Perioperative Management After Coronary Stenting: Risk Assessment Before Surgery. Christian Seiler No conflict of interest to declare.

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Freedom to Treat Your High Bleeding Risk Patients. Tim Kinnaird University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Is There A LIfe for DES after discontinuation of Clopidogrel

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Rationale for Percutaneous Revascularization ESC 2011

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

2-Year Patient-Related Versus Stent-Related Outcomes

Pathology of percutaneous interventions (PCI) in coronary arteries. Allard van der Wal, MD.PhD; Pathologie AMC, Amsterdam, NL

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

Non stent based intracoronary drug delivery

Drug Eluting Stents: an update Abbott Vascular. All rights reserved.

HCS Working Group Seminars Macedonia Pallas Hotel, Friday 21 st February Drug-eluting stents Are they all equal?

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 47, No. 7, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /06/$32.

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

Challenges of in-stent Restenosis. The Balloon Approach

Transcription:

Drug-Coated Balloons for Small Coronary Artery Disease: BASKET-SMALL 2 Raban V. Jeger,Ahmed Farah, Marc-Alexander Ohlow, Norman Mangner, Sven Möbius-Winkler, GregorLeibundgut, Daniel Weilenmann, JochenWöhrle, Stefan Richter, Matthias Schreiber, Felix Mahfoud, Axel Linke, Frank-Peter Stephan, Christian Mueller, Peter Rickenbacher, Michael Coslovsky, Nicole Gilgen, Stefan Osswald, Christoph Kaiser, and Bruno Scheller, for the BASKET-SMALL 2 Investigators

Funding Swiss National Science Foundation Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation B. Braun Medical AG, Switzerland No influence of the funding sources on design, conduct, or analysis of the trial

Background: Coronary Angioplasty Acute Vessel Closure (Elastic Recoil, Flow-limiting Dissections) No Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Stents to Prevent Acute Vessel Closure 1977 2000 Meier B, N Engl J Med2001;344:144-5

Background: Drug-Coated Balloons Fast and Homogenous Drug Delivery into the Vessel Wall Highly Lipophilic Drug & Coating Matrix Byrne RA et al, Nat Rev Cardiol 2014;11:13-23

Rationale 2 nd -generation drug-elutingstents(des) arethepreferredtreatmentforde-novo coronary lesions Efficacy of DES is limited in small vessels due to high rates of instent-restenosis Drug-coated balloons(dcb) are an established treatment strategy for in-stent restenoses of bare metal stents and DES The efficacy and safety of DCB in de-novo stenoses is unknown

Design Multicenter, randomizedcontrollednon-inferioritytrial(14 centersin Germany, Switzerland, and Austria) Patients undergoing PCI in native coronary arteries <3 mm Initial comparisonsequentplease DCB (B.BraunMelsungen)vs. Taxus Element DES (Boston Scientific), thenchangedtoxience DES (Abbott Vascular) after appr. 25% of patients Primary endpoint: Non-inferiority for major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) @ 12 months Expected MACE rates of 7% for DCB and 10% for DES with non-inferiority margin <4% (upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the absolute risk difference) Sample size calculation (based on Xience ): 758 patients

Patient Flow

Clinical Baseline Characteristics DCB (n=382) DES (n=376) Age (mean, SD) 67.2 (10.3) 68.4 (10.3) Sex Male (%) 295 (77.2) 262 (69.7) Current/former smoker (%) 226 (60.4) 195 (53.1) Hypercholesterolemia (%) 262 (68.8) 259 (70.0) Arterial hypertension (%) 324 (84.8) 332 (88.8) Family history of CAD (%) 150 (42.6) 128 (38.0) Diabetes mellitus (%) 122 (32.0) 130 (34.9) Previous MI (%) 160 (41.9) 133 (35.4) Cerebrovascular insult (%) 29 (7.6) 37 (9.8) PAOD (%) 27 (7.1) 26 (6.9) COPD (%) 28 (7.3) 36 (9.6) Renal failure (%) 54 (14.1) 59 (15.7) p=0.0232

Angiographic Baseline Characteristics Target vessel DCB (n=382) DES (n=376) Left anterior descending artery (%) 128 (33.5) 116 (30.9) Left circumflex artery (%) 179 (46.9) 183 (48.7) Right coronary artery (%) 75 (19.6) 77 (20.5) Bifurcation lesion (%) 22 (5.8) 29 (8.0) Procedural success (%, mean, SD) 96 (19) 98 (13) Number of DCB or DES (mean, SD) 1.68 (0.82) 1.26 (0.55) Length of DCB or DES (mm; mean, SD) 23.93 (11.74) 23.18 (12.85) Effective size of DCB or DES (mm; mean, SD) 2.75 (2.14) 2.57 (0.25) Inflation pressure (atm; mean, SD) 11.06 (3.54) 13.58 (3.90) Duration of inflation (sec; mean, SD) 48.45 (28.24) 23.36 (18.92)

Primary Endpoint(Non-Inferiority) Set Level Events Difference CI p PPS DES 27 / 359 (7.52%) DCB 28 / 370 (7.57%) 0.0005 [ 0.038, 0.039] 0.0217 FAS DES 28 / 376 (7.45%) DCB 28 / 382 (7.33%) 0.0012 [ 0.040, 0.037] 0.0152 Favors DCB 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 DCB (%) DES (%) Favors DES PPS, per protocol set; FAS, full analysis set.

MACE (12 Months) Cumulative MACE event rate 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 DES DCB MACE + + + DES DCB + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + + + + +++++ + + +++ + + Number at risk HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.64; p=0.9180 376 366 360 355 355 350 346 337 333 332 331 317 284 382 376 373 371 368 367 362 351 347 346 343 326 295

Single Components of MACE (12 Months) Cumulative CD events 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 stent balloon CD + stent + balloon ++ + + + + +++ ++ + + + +++ + + + + + +++ + +++++ + + + Number at risk Cardiac Death 376 370 368 365 365 364 361 356 354 354 353 340 305 382 378 376 375 373 372 369 360 357 357 355 340 308 Cumulative Non fatal MI events 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 stent balloon Non fatal MI + stent + balloon ++ ++ + ++ + + + +++ ++ +++++ + + + + + + + + + ++ ++ ++ + + ++ + + Number at risk Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction 376 366 361 357 357 353 350 345 342 342 341 327 293 382 376 375 374 372 371 368 358 354 354 352 336 305 Cumulative TVR events 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 stent balloon TVR + stent + balloon + ++ + + + ++ + + + +++ ++ +++++++ + + + + + + + + + ++ ++ + + ++ + + Number at risk Target-vessel Revascularization 376 367 362 358 358 355 351 342 339 338 337 323 289 382 377 375 373 370 369 364 353 350 349 346 330 298 3.1 vs. 1.3%; HR 2.33, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.61; p=0.1131 1.6 vs. 3.5%; HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.20; p=0.1123 3.4 vs. 4.5%; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.55; p=0.4375

Major Bleeding(BARC 3, 12 Months) Cumulative Major bleeding events 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 stent balloon + + stent balloon ++ ++ ++ + + + +++ ++ +++++ + + + + + + ++ + +++ ++ ++ + + ++ + + Number at risk 1.1 vs. 2.4%; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.46; p=0.1834 376 369 366 361 360 359 356 351 348 348 346 333 300 382 377 376 374 372 371 367 358 355 355 353 338 306

MACE (12 Months) for Device Subgroups 0.20 Cumulative MACE event rate 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 DCB DCB+DES Taxus Xience ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + +++ ++++ +++ ++ Number at risk 356 352 349 348 346 345 340 335 332 331 328 311 284 19 19 19 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 17 17 13 93 90 88 87 87 86 85 82 81 81 81 80 80 243 239 236 233 233 229 229 228 227 226 225 212 185 + DCB+DES + Taxus + DCB + Xience 15.8 vs. 7.0%; HR 2.11, 95% CI 0.62 to 7.19; p=0.2306 12.8 vs. 5.7%, HR 2.04, 95% CI 0.88 to 4.76; p=0.0987

Conclusions First large randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a paclitaxel-iopromide-coated DCB vs. second-generation DES in a large all-comer population regarding clinical endpoints DCB are non-inferior to DES in lesions of small native coronary arteries regarding MACE up to 12 months, with similar event rates for both treatment groups Small native coronary artery disease may safely be treated with DCB after successful predilatation

Thank you!