Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

Similar documents
Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

Session 47.

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Brilliant Blue FCF (E133) as a feed additive for cats and dogs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of propenylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 17) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

Withdrawal period for Coxidin for chickens and turkeys for fattening and re-examination of the provisional Maximum Residue Limit 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2, 3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sorbic acid and potassium sorbate when used as technological additives for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on safety and efficacy of di copper chloride tri hydroxide (tribasic copper chloride, TBCC) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Administrative guidance to applicants on the preparation and presentation of applications for authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM as a silage additive for all animal species

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2, 3

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Scientific Opinion on safety and efficacy of Cycostat 66G (robenidine hydrochloride) for rabbits for breeding and fattening 1, 2

Transcription:

EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2 ABSTRACT European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy The additive rosemary extract liquid of natural origin is intended to be used as a technological additive (antioxidant) in feed for dogs and cats. The FEEDAP Panel assessed the data provided by the applicant in the technical dossier. During the course of the assessment, the need for additional information in order to be able to deliver an opinion on the safety and efficacy of this additive was identified and notified to the applicant. The information requested covered several aspects of the characterisation of the additive, the safety of the additive for the target species and its efficacy. The applicant has failed to provide the additional information even after several requests by EFSA. Therefore, considering the data provided in the original dossier and the absence of response from the applicant to the requests from EFSA, the FEEDAP Panel is not in a position to deliver an opinion on the safety and efficacy of the additive rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological additive for dogs and cats. European Food Safety Authority, 2012 KEY WORDS Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin, safety, efficacy, dogs, cats 1 On request from the European Commission, Question No EFSA-Q-2004-176, adopted on 13 December 2011. 2 Panel members: Gabriele Aquilina, Georges Bories, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Joop de Knecht, Noël Albert Dierick, Mikolaj Antoni Gralak, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Christer Hogstrand, Reinhard Kroker, Lubomir Leng, Secundino López Puente, Anne-Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Giovanna Martelli, Miklós Mézes, Derek Renshaw, Maria Saarela, Kristen Sejrsen and Johannes Westendorf. Correspondence: FEEDAP@efsa.europa.eu Suggested citation: EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526. [7 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2526. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal European Food Safety Authority, 2012

SUMMARY Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of the product rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological additive (antioxidant) in feed for dogs and cats. The FEEDAP Panel assessed the data provided by the applicant in the technical dossier. During the course of the assessment, the need for additional information in order to be able to deliver an opinion on the safety and efficacy of this additive was identified and notified to the applicant. The information requested covered several aspects of the characterisation of the additive, the safety of the additive for the target species and its efficacy. The applicant has failed to provide the additional information even after several requests by EFSA. Therefore, considering the data provided in the original dossier and the absence of response from the applicant to the requests from EFSA, the FEEDAP Panel is not in a position to deliver an opinion on the safety and efficacy of the additive rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological additive for dogs and cats. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract... 1 Summary... 2 Table of contents... 3 Background... 4 Terms of reference... 4 1. Introduction... 7 2. The application and dossier... 7 3. Conclusions... 7 EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 3

BACKGROUND Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 3 establishes the rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition. In particular, Article 4(1) of that Regulation lays down that any person seeking authorisation for a feed additive or for a new use of a feed additive shall submit an application in accordance with Article 7. The European Commission received a request from the company Kemin Europe NV 4 for authorisation of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin to be used as a feed additive (category: technological additives; functional group: antioxidants) for dogs and cats under the conditions mentioned in Table 1. According to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the Commission forwarded the application to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as an application under Article 4(1) (authorisation of a feed additive or new use of a feed additive). EFSA received directly from the applicant the technical dossier in support of this application. 5 According to Article 8 of that Regulation, EFSA, after verifying the particulars and documents submitted by the applicant, shall undertake an assessment in order to determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. The particulars and documents in support of application were considered valid by EFSA as of 1 April 2005. This product has not been previously authorised as a technological feed additive for use in animal nutrition in the European Union. TERMS OF REFERENCE According to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, EFSA shall determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. EFSA shall deliver an opinion on the safety for the target animal(s), consumer, user and the environment and the efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin, when used under the conditions described in Table 1. 3 Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29. 4 Kemin Europa N.V. Nutrisurance Division. Atealaan 4N, 2200 Herentals, Belgium. 5 EFSA Dossier reference: FAD-2004-003. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 4

Table 1: Description and conditions of use of the additive as proposed by the applicant Additive Registration number/ec No/No Category(-ies) of additive Functional group(s) of additive Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin - Technological additives Antioxidants Composition, description Carnosic acid (9.0-10.0 %) Sunflower oil (82.0-90.0 %) Other rosemary compounds (max 9.0 %) Chemical formula C 20 H 28 O 4 Description Purity criteria Method of analysis A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was used to quantify the carnosic acid in Rosemary Extract. The method used a Zorbax XDB-C8 column and a gradient elution consisting of acetonitrile and water. HPLC conditions were determined which permitted the separation and measurement of the phenolic diterpenes by absorbance detection at 280 nm with a suitable detector. The method was validated following the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. In addition limits of quantification and resolution were calculated. Trade name Name of the holder of authorisation Rosemary Extract Liquid of Natural Origin KEMIN EUROPE NV, NUTRISURANCE Division Species or category of animal Maximum Age Conditions of use Minimum content Maximum content Withdrawal period mg/kg of complete feedingstuffs Dogs and cats N/A 50 500 N/A Specific conditions or restrictions for use Specific conditions or restrictions for handling Other provisions and additional requirements for the labeling Rosemary Extract liquid is added to the complete feedingstuff via a topical fat which makes up 5 to 10 % of the total formulation. For a diet containing 10 % fat, a treatment of 5000 mg/kg to the fat added to the diet would provide the typical 500 mg/kg treatment level for the diet. N/A EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 5

Post-market monitoring Specific conditions for use in complementary feedingstuffs N/A N/A Marker residue Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) Species or category of animal Target tissue(s) or food products Maximum content in tissues N/A N/A N/A N/A EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 6

1. Introduction Rosemary extract for dogs and cats The present application concerns the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin to be used as an antioxidant in petfood for dogs and cats. It is extracted from rosemary leaves, and its antioxidant activity is attributed to the compounds carnosic acid, carnosol and rosmarinic acid. 2. The application and dossier The European Commission received an application for the use of this product in feedingstuffs for dogs and cats on 13 December 2004. This application was received by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on 23 December 2004. EFSA immediately started the verification of the dossier to check whether all the documents and particulars requested in Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 18318/2003 were provided. The dossier was considered valid for the start of the assessment on 1 April 2005. The scientific evaluation of the technical dossier started immediately. During the course of the assessment, the working group of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) identified the need for additional information in order to be able to deliver an opinion on the safety and efficacy of this additive. The information request was sent to the applicant on 31 May 2005 and covered several aspects of the characterisation of the additive, the safety of the additive for the target species and its efficacy. In several occasions the applicant requested extensions of the deadline to provide the information, which was eventually set to 1 October 2010. Since then, the applicant had been asked several times to answer EFSA s request but the data was never provided. Therefore, on 5 October 2011, EFSA notified the applicant its intention to finalise the assessment regarding the dossier of reference.. The European Union Reference Laboratory delivered its report on the methods of analysis for this dossier. 6 3. Conclusions Considering the data provided in the original dossier and the absence of response from the applicant to the requests from EFSA for additional information, the FEEDAP Panel is not in a position to deliver an opinion on the safety and efficacy of the additive Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological additive for dogs and cats. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. Dossier on Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as an antioxidant for pet food. November 2004. Submitted by Kemin Europa N.V. Nutrisurance Division. 2. Evaluation report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives on the methods(s) of analysis for Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin. 3. Comments from Member States received through the ScienceNet. 6 The full report is available on the EURL website: http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sitecollectiondocuments/finrep-fad- 2004-0003.pdf EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 7