Progress Report on the CODA Project

Similar documents
Design of an eastern tropical Pacific (ETP) dolphin survey

California Cooperative Fisheries Investigation Marine Mammal Surveys for

CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES INVESTIGATION (CALCOFI) CRUISES:

Common indicator: Abundance at the relevant temporal scale of cetacean species regularly present (M4) Interim version

CETACEANS AND PELAGIC TRAWL FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN APPROACHES OF THE ENGLISH CHANNEL

Cetacean Distribution & Relative Abundance Survey

the North Sea and adjacent waters

Note on the recent French studies on by catch and pingers in the English Channel

Annual National Reports c) Denmark

POINTLESS PERIL. [Deadlines and Death Counts]

Seismic testing and the impacts of high intensity sound on whales. Lindy Weilgart Department of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia

Integrating marine mammal populations and rates of prey consumption in models and forecasts of CC-ecosystem change in the N Atlantic

Ceteacean Social Behavioral Response to Sonar

Marine Mammals and Surveys

R.V. Cefas Endeavour Plankton Survey. Cetacean Distribution & Relative Abundance Survey. 18 February 28 February 2009

2013 Annual National Report Finland

MARINE MAMMAL MONITORING ON CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES INVESTIGATION (CALCOFI) CRUISES:

British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Applied Ecology.

Favourable Conservation Status of Bottlenose Dolphins

High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package Annual Data Summary Report March 14, 2009 March 26, 2010 SOCAL Site N

The effects of seismic operations in UK waters: analysis of Marine Mammal Observer data

A framework to assess vulnerability of biological components to ship-source oil spills in the marine environment

BIASES AND DATA LIMITATIONS OF ODONTOCETE CETACEAN SIGHTING DATA FROM SMALL-BOAT BASED SURVEYS AROUND THE MAIN HAWAIIAN ISLANDS

Answer to DG Environment request on scientific information concerning impact of sonar activities on cetacean populations

Dolphins of San Diego County David W. Weller, Ph.D.

Is Ireland a sanctuary: protection of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoise) in Irish waters

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MARINE MAMMALS RELEVANT TO SEA2

Implications for ASCOBANS of Enlarging the Agreement Area and Including All Cetaceans

Conserving cetaceans and manatees in the western African region

Post-mortem research and stranding schemes. Harbour porpoises on Belgian beaches from 1990 to 1999 ASCOBANS

Joint Cetacean Protocol. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Inverdee House Baxter House Aberdeen AB11 9QA.

Assessing Beaked Whale Reproduction and Stress Response Relative to Sonar Activity at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC)

Population parameters of Blainville s and Cuvier s beaked whales

Scientist and ferry operator: Working together the advantages of collaboration

Behavioural Response Study 2008

existing data: Bottlenose dolphins

T +44 (0) F +44 (0) E W whales.org

Population parameters of Blainville s and Cuvier s beaked whales

Protecting Cuvier s Beaked Whales from Underwater Noise. Lindy Weilgart, Ph.D. Dept. of Biology

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

RESEARCH ACTIVITIES OF CETACEAN IN INDONESIA. Dharmadi Research Centre for Fisheries Management and Conservation

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 STICHTING RUGVIN / RUGVIN FOUNDATION

(ARC) Tom Brereton, Dave Wall, Pablo Cermeno, Dave Curtis, Antonio Vasquez & Andy Williams PLYMOUTH- SANTANDER MARINE SURVEY.

Provide a Vessel to Conduct Observations and Deploy Sound Source for a Behavioral Response Study of Cetaceans off Southern California in 2011

SAVED! Hawaii's False Killer Whales

VACAPES Outer Continental Shelf Cetacean Study, Virginia Beach, Virginia: 2016 Annual Progress Report

Acoustic and Visual Survey of Cetaceans at Palmyra Atoll

Survival Rates. Species Since 1963 April Pacific White-sided dolphins Short finned pilot whales. Beluga Orca Psuedo Orca 33 8

Report on the Results of the Year of the Dolphin 2007/2008

Cetacean Social & Reproductive Systems

MSFD and MEDCIS contribution

Marine Mammal Species likely to be Encountered in the Coastal Waters of Virginia from Analysis of Stranding Data

Priorities in the Implementation of the Triennium Work Plan ( ) Review of New Information on Bycatch

Marine Mammal Monitoring Surveys in Support of. Valiant Shield Training Exercises (Aug , 2007)-- Final Report

SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION

BIODIVERSITY ANNUAL REPORT 2016 STATUS OF DOLPHINS IN ABU DHABI

Auditory studies on harbour porpoises in relation to offshore wind turbines

The reaction of Southern resident orca to sensitive frequencies produced by nearby vessels

Cetacean Community Ecology in the Waters of Sri Lanka and the Bay of Bengal

Monitoring of Protected Species in the Proposed Jacksonville USWTR Progress Report: Jan-Mar 2009

Marine Mammal Conservation Corridor for Northern South America (MaMa CoCo Sea) Follow-Up Workshop March Paramaribo, Suriname

DISTRIBUTION OF DOLPHINS IN GALAPAGOS WATERS

Special request, Advice May OSPAR request on implementation of MSFD for marine mammals

Bottlenose dolphins in Connemara and Mayo Movement patterns between two coastal areas in the west of Ireland.

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme

DolphinWatch: Dolphins in the Chesapeake Bay. Amber Fandel Faculty Research Assistant

Biological diversity of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) in Irish waters.

Acoustic and Visual Survey of Cetaceans at Palmyra Atoll

Marine Mammals in Scottish Waters

ICES WGMME REPORT Report of the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME) 9 12 February London, UK ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Ecology. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2012

Fish 475: Marine Mammalogy

SIO 133 Marine Mammal Popula4on Dynamics. John Hildebrand, Scripps Inst. Oceanography, UCSD

Distribution, encounter rates, and habitat characteristics of toothed cetaceans in the Bay of Biscay and adjacent waters from platform-ofopportunity

Marine mammal demographics off the outer Washington coast and near Hawaii. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School; Department of Oceanography

Inshore boat-based surveys for cetaceans

Odontocetes found in the Southern California Bight

Temporal Variability of Cetaceans near Halifax, Nova Scotia

CETACEANS IN IRISH WATERS: A REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH

Movements of sperm whale in the western Mediterranean Sea: preliminary photo-identification results

Population Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance of Blainville s Beaked Whales at AUTEC

Protected Species Mitigation and Monitoring Report

MARINE MAMMAL ECOLOGY

Basic Hearing and Echolocation Mechanisms of Marine Mammals: Measured Auditory Evoked Potential and Behavioral Experiments FY 2008

CONSERVATION STATUS OF CETACEANS IN KIEN GIANG BIOSPHERE RESERVE, KIEN GIANG PROVINCE, VIETNAM

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

Cetaceans and Seabirds of Ireland s Atlantic Margin

Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R)- Southern California Offshore Anti-submarine Warfare Range (SOAR) FY12 Test Summary

May 20, Dear Steve,

Amrun Project 2016 Inshore Dolphin Survey Summary Blue Planet Marine

Erin Oleson & Marie Hill NOAA-NMFS-Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center

ORCA s Whale Education Month Lesson Pack 3: Porpoises

Using T-PODs to assess variations in the occurrence of coastal bottlenose dolphins and harbour porpoises

Effects of Disturbance on Populations of Marine Mammals

he mission of the National Marine Sanctuary Program is to manage marine areas of special national significance in order to protect their ecological

Final Report: Acoustic Survey for Harbour Porpoises in the English Channel

Movements and Habitat Use of Dwarf and Pygmy Sperm Whales using Remotely-deployed LIMPET Satellite Tags

Term Paper. Midterm Exam

HELCOM Indicator Fact Sheet: Decline of the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the southwestern Baltic Sea

Transcription:

15 th ASCOBANS Advisory Committee Meeting Document AC15/Doc.39 (S) UN Campus, Bonn, Germany, 31 March-3 April 2008 Dist. 27 March 2008 Agenda Item 14.4.2 Implementation of the ASCOBANS Triennial Work Plan (2007-2009) Review of New Information on Population Distribution, Sizes and Structures SCANS II Results, CODA Project and TNASS Document 39 Progress Report on the CODA Project Action Requested take note of the information submitted comment Submitted by Secretariat NOTE: IN THE INTERESTS OF ECONOMY, DELEGATES ARE KINDLY REMINDED TO BRING THEIR OWN COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO THE MEETING

Progress report on the CODA project Prepared by K. Macleod and P.S. Hammond. Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, UK 1 Introduction In 2005, the SCANS-II (Macleod et al., 2006) project followed up on the SCANS 1994 (Hammond et al., 2002) project to survey the North Sea and wider continental shelf waters of the European Atlantic to generate estimates of cetacean abundance, primarily for harbour porpoise. The survey area included the original ASCOBANS Agreement Area. Information from a current project, Cetacean Offshore Distribution and Abundance in the European Atlantic (CODA), is relevant to the newly agreed extended ASCOBANS Agreement Area. The principal objective of CODA is to estimate cetacean abundance in offshore European Atlantic waters; focal species are common dolphin, bottlenose dolphin, fin whale and deep diving species. The project will also develop further the management framework developed under SCANS-II to assess the impact of bycatch and to determine safe bycatch limits for common dolphin. Other objectives are to investigate habitat preferences for common dolphins and other species as data allow and to obtain information on distribution and abundance of sperm whales and other deep diving species to contribute to our understanding of the impact of industrial and military seismic and sonar activities. Surveys were carried out during summer 2007 and information on sightings distribution is presented. The data are currently being analysed to generate abundance estimates. 2 CODA surveys: July 2005 In July 2007, the CODA surveys were carried out to generate new estimates of cetacean abundance in European Atlantic offshore waters, beyond the continental shelf. The survey area extended from approximately 61-42 N and 1-18 W. The survey methods used were the same as those used for the SCANS-II surveys in 2005. Double platform line transect surveys were carried out on all ships, requiring two teams of observers, a primary and tracker, on each. This method allows the analyses to account for the probability of detection on the transect line to be less than one and for responsive movement of animals to the ship, eliminating these sources of bias in the abundance estimates. 2.1 Visual survey Five ships covered 11 417km (Figure 1) of transects in an area of 967 538km 2. All survey ships covered at least 75% of the designed transects in Beaufort seastates 1-4. Sightings amounted to almost 1 500 encounters of seventeen species from all ships combined (Table 1). All sightings recorded on the primary platform are shown in Figure 2. Fin whale encounters were greatest and centred in the western Bay of Biscay (Figure 3). Sightings of large whales were frequent but observers detected them as blows some distance from the vessel, which proved difficult to identify to species. Common dolphins occurred mainly in the southern part of the survey area (Figure 3), particularly in the Bay of Biscay. Other species, such as sperm whales, were seen throughout the area. Three Ziphiid species were recorded; Cuvier s beaked whale, Sowerby s beaked whale and the northern bottlenose whale. 2.2 Acoustic survey High frequency (harbour porpoise) data were collected from all CODA ships and from within all four CODA survey blocks. A total of 36137.18 minutes (602 hours / 771 files) of HF acoustic data was collected (Figure 4). Dolphin click trains were detected within all four blocks and a single harbour porpoise click train was detected in CODA block 2. Medium frequency recordings were also collected from all CODA ships throughout the area. A total of 38658.76 minutes (644 hours / 5459 files) of MF recordings was collected, and these are currently being post processed with sperm whale and beaked whale detection parameters. 3 Abundance estimation A workshop took place in January 2007 to progress the analysis of the visual survey data. The data will be analysed to estimate abundance using two methods; 1) Mark Recapture Distance Sampling (MRDS) and 2) Density Surface Modelling (DSM). Abundance will not be estimated for all species because the numbers of sightings, particularly duplicates, were too small for some. Abundance will be estimated by these methods for common dolphins, striped dolphins and fin whales. Abundance will also be generated

for pilot whales, sperm whales and bottlenose dolphins but conventional distance sampling methods might be used if sample sizes do not allow a good fit of the detection function using MRDS. The estimates of abundance from the MRDS analysis will be completed by mid-may 2008. The DSM analysis will be completed by August 2008. The DSM will also identify important environmental characteristics that influence the distribution and density of cetaceans. Geostatistical methods will be used to investigate habitat preferences of cetaceans as an alternative and comparative approach to the DSM. Species Table 1: Summary of sightings from all ships by platform. Primary Sightings Tracker Sightings Duplicates Total Duplicates Definite Possible Remote Big cetacean 1 3 0 0 0 0 Bottlenose dolphin 23 28 10 0 2 12 Blue whale 1 0 0 0 0 0 Cuvier s beaked whale 6 11 2 0 0 2 Common dolphin 106 86 40 3 0 43 Common/striped dolphin 30 59 13 2 0 15 False killer whale 0 1 0 0 0 0 Fin/Sei whale 5 7 1 1 0 2 Fin whale 195 241 80 9 1 90 Harbour porpoise 2 1 0 0 0 0 Killer whale 0 3 0 0 0 0 Lagenorhynchus sp. 0 1 0 0 0 0 Long-finned pilot whale 46 61 16 2 1 19 Long/short-finned pilot whale 3 3 2 0 0 2 Medium cetacean 13 13 0 0 1 1 Minke whale 15 11 2 1 0 3 Northern Bottlenose whale 1 2 0 0 0 0 Patterned dolphin 2 5 0 0 0 0 Risso s dolphin 2 1 0 0 0 0 Small cetacean 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sowerby s beaked whale 5 4 2 0 0 2 Striped dolphin 33 38 16 1 0 17 Sperm whale 34 48 17 0 0 17 Sei whale 12 13 7 0 0 7 Unidentified dolphin 14 36 3 1 0 4 Unidentified beaked whale 11 13 2 1 0 3 Unidentified whale 107 88 15 9 0 24 Whitesided dolphin 14 8 2 0 0 2 Total 685 785 230 30 5 265 Table 2. Number of high frequency acoustic detections. Key: MC Mars Chaser; RA Rari; GE Germinal; IN Investigador; CS Cornide de Saavedra CODA Blocks Ship Delphinid click trains 1 Single track harbour porpoise click trains 1 MC 79 0 2 RA /GE 65 1 3 & 4 IN /CS 170 0 1 Click trains can represent one animal or more than one animal.

1 2 3 4 Figure 1: CODA survey area and effort, July 2007 Figure 2: Sightings by primary platform observers on all ships Figure 3: Distribution of common dolphins and fin whales.

Figure 4: Acoustic survey effort and high frequency acoustic detections. 4 Literature Cited Hammond, P.S., Berggren, P., Benke, H., Borchers, D.L., Collet, A., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Heimlich, S., Hiby, A.R., Leopold, M.F. and Øien, N. 2002. Abundance of harbour porpoises and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 361-376. Macleod, K., Scheidat, M and Hammond, P. S. 2006. Taking stock of European Cetaceans: the SCANS-II surveys. Presentation to the 20 TH Annual European Cetacean Society, Poland, April 2006. 5 Acknowledgements The CODA project received funding from UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; UK Department for Trade and Industry; Irish Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government; Irish Bord Iascaigh Mhara; and Spanish Cetacean Society. The Spanish Institute of Oceanography, AZTI Technical and Marine Nationale provided ship and/or personnel time. Those pivotal to the success of the abundance surveys were: Cañadas, Lens, Rogan, Santos, Swift, Van Canneyt, Vázquez (shipboard cruise leaders); Gillespie, Gordon and Leaper (data acquisition development) and, of course, all the survey observers.