Strategies towards cure of HCV infection: a personalized approach. Heiner Wedemeyer Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany

Similar documents
New Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C. Rafael Esteban Hospital Valle Hebron. Barcelona Spain

Bristol-Myers Squibb. HCV Full Development Portfolio Overview. Richard Bertz Int Workshop CP HIV Meeting Amsterdam, Netherlands 24 April 2013

VII CURSO AVANCES EN INFECCIÓN VIH Y HEPATITIS VIRALES

Direct acting anti-virals: the near future

The HCV pipeline: Will IFN-free treatment be possible? Heiner Wedemeyer. Hannover Medical School Germany

Interferon-based and interferon-free new treatment options

EASL 2013 Interferon Free, All Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Evolution of Therapy in HCV

Interferon free HCV Therapy: Are we getting there?

Antiviral agents in HCV

HALLMARK-DUAL Study. Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir in Genotype 1b. Hepatitis. Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Introduction. The ELECTRON Trial

How to optimize current therapy for GT1 patients Shortened therapy with IFNa-based therapy

Highlights of AASLD 2012 CCO Official Conference Coverage of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

HCV Treatment in 2016: is there still a role for IFNa and ribavirin?

Interferon free therapy Are we getting there? Graham R Foster Queen Marys University of London

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

Clinical Management: Treatment of HCV Mono-infection

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

Experience with pre-transplant antiviral treatment: PEG/RBV and DAA. Xavier Forns, MD Liver Unit Hospital Clínic IDIBAPS and CIBREHD Barcelona

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

Abstract 233. Post-treatment follow up. Pawlotsky JM, et al. 63rd AASLD; Boston, MA; November 9-13, 2012:. Abst ALV loading* RVR at W4

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Interferon Side Effects and The Future of Interferon Sparing Regimens. Todd Wills, MD ETAC Infectious Disease Specialist

New Therapeutic Strategies: Polymerase Inhibitors

NS5A inhibitors: ideal candidates for combination?

Pivotal New England Journal of Medicine papers 2014 Phase 3 Trial data

Future strategies with new DAAs

New developments in HCV research and their implications for front-line practice

IFN-free for Genotype 1 HCV: the current landscape. Prof. Graham R Foster

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 1)

HCV Case Study. Treat Now or Wait for New Therapies

The Pipeline of New HCV Therapies: What to Expect in the Next 5 Years. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor University of Chicago

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

Treatments of Genotype 2, 3,and 4: Now and in the future

EASL and The Future of HCV Treatment

CURRENT TREATMENTS. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia. Richmond and Newport News, VA, USA

Protease inhibitor based triple therapy in treatment experienced patients

Hepatitis D. Challenges in 2018

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Cirrhotic Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 EXPEDITION-1

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Oral combination therapy: future hepatitis C virus treatment? "Lancet Oct 30;376(9751): Oral combination therapy with a nucleoside

Program Disclosure. Provider is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider #13664, for 1.5 contact hours.

Rome, February nd Riunione Annuale AISF th AISF ANNUAL MEETING

New Therapies on the Horizon in Hepatitis C Patients Paul Y. Kwo, MD

Clinical Сase A previously relapse to PEG IFN + RBV in HCV G3a patient. Konstantin Zhdanov

The Liver Meeting 2013: The 64th Annual Meeting of the AASLD Washington, DC, November 1 5, 2013 Presentation LB-1

Hepatitis C: Management of Previous Non-responders with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2

How do you optimize HCV Treatment for Cirrhotic Patients APASL STC Cebu

Hepatitis C Emerging Therapy Update: Reports From the Liver Meeting 2012

Antiviral treatment in HCV cirrhotic patients on waiting list

HCV: Beyond the current generation of protease inhibitors

Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Treating HCV Genotype 2 & 3

Virological Tools and Monitoring in the DAA Era

Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial

Treatement Experienced patients without cirrhosis. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona

Update in the Management of Hepatitis C: What Does the Future Hold

Current Treatment Options for HCV Patients. Michael Manns Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology Hannover Germany

Don t interfere My first choice is always nucs!

Should Elderly CHC Patients (>70 years old) be Treated?

Feeling right at home

Clinical Cases Hepatitis C Naïve Patients. Rafael Esteban Liver Unit. Hospital General Universitari Vall Hebron. Barcelona.

HEPATITIS WEB STUDY. Treatment of Hepatitis C following Liver Transplantation

How to optimize treatment in G3 patients? Jérôme GOURNAY, MD Hépatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes France

TREATMENT OF GENOTYPE 2

HCV Resistance Associated variants: impact on chronic hepatitis C treatment

Treatment Targets HCV Genotype 1 & PIs Treating HCV G2&3 Future Therapies. Advances in treatment of HCV Dr John F Dillon

Update on the Treatment of HCV

Michael Fried, MD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC. Ira Jacobson, MD Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY

SURVEYOR-II Part 2 Study Design

A collaborative and agile pharmaceutical company with an R&D focus on infectious diseases and a leading position in hepatitis C

Original article Daclatasvir combined with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C genotype 1

Treatment of Unique Populations Raymond T. Chung, MD

IFN-free therapy in naïve HCV GT1 patients

Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir (Harvoni)

SVR Updates from the 2013 EASL

HCV Treatment: Why to Wait

Why make this statement?

Special Contribution Highlights of the 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Meeting

8/5/2014. A new era of HCV clinical management. Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C. Goal of HCV treatment is viral cure HIV HBV HCV

2017 Bruce Lucas Hepatology and Liver Transplant Symposium October 13th 2017 Management of Hepatitis C in Pre- and Post-Transplant Patients

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 1)

Felizarta, Bo Fu, Teresa Ng, Chih-Wei Lin, Federico Mensa Abstract 253. Pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530) pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor

47 th Annual Meeting AISF

Phase 3. Treatment Experienced. Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2. Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:

The HCV Pipeline Ira M. Jacobson, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF. Slide Presentation. IFN-free DAA combinations (G1)

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Saeed Hamid, MD Alex Thompson, MD, PhD

The role of triple therapy with protease inhibitors in hepatitis C virus genotype 1na «ve patients

Pegylated interferon based therapy with second-wave direct-acting antivirals in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C

Current Treatments for HCV

Will difficult-to-treat patients remain difficultto-treat. generation of treatments?

CASE STUDY. Adverse Events in treatment chronic hepatitis C patients with PegInterferon and Ribavirin What would your management decision be?

November 2013 AASLD Investor Event 4 November

ABCs of Hepatitis C: What s New. The Long-Awaited New Era: Protease Inhibitors for HCV Genotype 1

HCV-G3: Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir?

Update on Real-World Experience With HARVONI

Transcription:

Strategies towards cure of HCV infection: a personalized approach Heiner Wedemeyer Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany 1

Disclosures Honoraria for consulting or speaking (last 5 years): Abbott, Biolex, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, ITS, JJ/Janssen Cilag, Merck/Schering Plough, Novartis, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens, Transgene, ViiV Research grants: Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens

Antiviral Targets Against Hepatitis C Entry Inhibitors TLR Agonists Therapeutic Vaccine Other IFNs PEG-IFN lambda Ribavirin NS5A Inhibitors Protease Inhibitors Cyclophillin Inhibitors Polymeraseinhibitors NI NNI

Peg-IFN-lambda-induced antiviral activity via a similar signaling pathway, but distinct receptor Type I Interferons Type III Interferons Broad receptor distribution throughout various body tissues Receptors distributed primarily in epithelial cells and hepatocytes Antiviral effects Antiviral effects Adverse events of treatment Flu-like symptoms Haematologic disorders Psychiatric symptoms Type I IFNs Peg-Intron PegIFN-2a IFN omega IFN-alfa-2b XL Belerofon Albuferon Locteron Type III IFNs Peg-IFNlambda (Peg-rIL-29) Potentially fewer adverse events than with type I interferons 4 Adapted from 1. Marcello T et al. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1887 98; 2. Muir AJ et al. 2009 AASLD. Abstract 1591; 3. O'Brien TR. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1048 50.

5 EMERGE Phase 2b study: Lambda/RBV, compared with alfa-2a/rbv Blinded and randomised study of 526 non-cirrhotic treatment-naïve adults 118 chronically infected with HCV GT 2 or GT 3. HCV RNA 100,000 IU/mL Lambda + RBV (N=393) Alfa-2a + RBV (N=133) 120 μg 180 μg 240 μg 180 μg Weeks GT 1+4 GT 2+3 GT 1+4 GT 2+3 GT 1+4 GT 2+3 GT 1+4 GT 2+3 Follow up Follow up Follow up Follow up cevr=complete early virological response; EOT=end-of-treatment; GT=genotype RVR=rapid virological response; RBV=ribavirin; SVR=sustained virological response Adapted from 1. Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2011. Oral Presentation LB-1360; 2. Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 1435. Follow up Follow up Follow up Follow up 0 4 12 24 48 72 RVR cevr 12-week data EOT GT 2+3 Data presented in later slides EOT GT 1+4 SVR 24 GT 2+3 SVR 24 GT 1+4 Data to be presented in the future Presented data: GT 1+4, 12-week on-treatment; 1 GT 2+3, 48-week (SVR 24 ) 2

GT 1/4: Virological responses through Week 12 HCV RNA, mean (SE) log 10 IU/mL 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Study week Lambda 120 μg Lambda 180 μg Lambda 240 μg Alfa-2a 180 μg Percent response (± 95% CI) 100 80 60 40 20 0 6.0 *p <0.05 vs alfa-2a * * * * 55.0 55.9 56.3 14.7 16.5 RVR cevr RVR cevr RVR cevr RVR cevr 120 μg 180 μg 240 μg Alfa-2a Lambda * 5.8 37.9 Rapid HCV-RNA suppression observed with lambda vs alfa-2a 6 Roche COBAS TaqMan HPS v2.0; lower limit of detection=10 IU/mL; cevr=complete early virological response; RVR=rapid virological response; GT=genotype Adapted from Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2011. Oral Presentation LB-1360.

GT 2/3: Virological responses through SVR 24 HCV RNA <10 IU/mL (percent of patients ± 95% CI) 100 80 60 40 20 0 * 44.8 89.7 65.5 75.9 96.6 75.9 66.7 86.7 60.0 30.0 86.7 53.3 RVR cevr SVR RVR cevr SVR RVR cevr SVR RVR cevr SVR Lambda 120 μg Lambda 180 μg Lambda 240 μg Alfa-2a 180 μg N= 29 29 30 30 * *p<0.05 vs alfa Relapse rates were comparable between lambda and alfa-2a arms 7 Modified intention-to-treat (mitt) efficacy analysis: discontinuations prior to an endpoint classified as nonresponders; cevr=complete early virological response RVR=rapid virological response; SVR=sustained virological response Adapted from Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 1435.

GT 2/3: Adverse event summary 1 % Lambda 120 µg (N=29) Lambda 180 µg (N=29) Lambda 240 µg (N=30) Alfa-2a (N=30) Discontinuations for AEs 3.4 0 10.0 6.7 Related to treatment 3.4 0 3.3 3.3 Reduced peg-ifn dose 6.9 6.9 13.3 26.7 Held/reduced RBV dose 24.1 6.9 23.3 43.3 Patients with any serious AEs 0 3.4 13.3 3.3 Related to treatment 0 0 6.7 3.3 AE categories of special interest* Musculoskeletal 27.6 20.7 16.7 63.3 Constitutional 41.4 27.6 50.0 53.3 Flu-like 17.2 20.7 23.3 40.0 Psychiatric 44.8 41.4 40.0 33.3 Neurological 27.6 24.1 36.7 33.3 Adverse events and rates of discontinuations in GT 1/4 were similar through Week 12 2 *Categories of interest are based on preferred terms found in the alfa label reported in at least 5% of patients; Includes depression, irritability or insomnia 8 AE=adverse event; Peg-IFN=pegylated interferon; RBV=ribavirin Adapted from 1.Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 1435; 2. Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2011. Oral Presentation LB-1360.

GT 2/3: Haematological toxicities and associated dose adjustments at Week 24 1 Haematological toxicity, % Lambda 180 µg (N=29) Alfa-2a 180 µg (N=30) Haemoglobin low (<10 g/dl OR decrease of >3.4 g/dl from BL) 6.9 44.8 RBV dose reduction for low haemoglobin 0 23.3 Neutrophils low (<750/mm 3 ) 0 27.5 Platelets low (<100,000/mm 3 ) 0 24.1 Peg-IFN dose reduction for haematological abnormality 0 23.3 Haematological adverse events and dose reductions in GT 1/4 were similar through Week 12 2 Lambda recipients compensate for RBV-induced haemolysis via a greater erythropoietic response than that observed with alfa-2a 3 9 BL=baseline; GT=genotype; pegifn=pegylated interferon; RBV=ribavirin Adapted from 1. Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 1435; 2. Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2011. Oral Presentation LB-1360; 3. Everson G, et al. AASLD 2011. Poster 1343.

GT 2/3: Liver-related abnormalities and associated dose adjustments at Week 24 1 Lab toxicity, % ALT and/or AST Total bilirubin Severity Lambda 120 µg (N=29) Lambda 180 µg (N=29) Lambda 240 µg (N=30) Alfa-2a 180 µg (N=30) >5.0 10 ULN 3.4 6.9 13.3 13.3 >10 ULN 0 0 3.3 0 1.6 2.5 ULN 10.3 3.4 16.7 6.9 2.6 5.0 ULN 6.9 0 0 0 >5.0 ULN 0 0 6.7 0 Peg-IFN dose reductions for liver-related lab abnormality Peg-IFN discontinuations for liver-related lab abnormality Both due to hyperbilirubinaemia Neither met the criteria for pdili* Both resolved following discontinuation 0 3.4 6.7 0 3.4 0 3.3 0 *FDA criteria for pdili: ALT >5 baseline or pre-event nadir AND >10 ULN, and bilirubin >2 ULN 10 ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; pdili=possible drug-induced liver injury; peg-ifn=pegylated interferon; ULN=upper limit of normal Adapted from 1. Zeuzem S, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 1435.

Interferon lambda Summary In the Phase 2 EMERGE study, lambda, compared with alfa-2a, demonstrated Higher cevr rates in patients infected with genotypes 1/4 Similar or numerically greater SVR 24 rates in patients with GT 2/3 Rapid time to virological reduction Fewer IFN or RBV dose reductions, musculoskeletal or flu-like events and less haematological toxicity* Ongoing / planed studies (www.clinicaltrials.gov): Phase 2 PEG-IFN lambda + RBV + Daclatasvir / Asunaprevir (Gen 1) Phase 3 PEG-IFN lambda + RBV + Telaprevir (800 Gen 1 patients) Phase 3 PEG-IFN lambda + RBV +/- Daclatasvir (875 Gen 2/3 patients) Phase 2 PEG-IFN lambda in HBeAg-positive Hepatitis B 11 *Rates of AEs 2-fold difference between the lambda and alfa-2a groups; GT=genotype IFN=interferon; RBV=ribavirin; SVR=sustained virological response

Entry Inhibitors Advanced BMS Programs TLR Agonists Therapeutic Vaccine Other IFNs PEG IFN lambda NS5A Inhibitors Protease Inhibitors Cyclophillin Inhibitors Polymeraseinhibitors NI NNI

DAAs against HCV in clinical development Protease Inhibitors 2nd wave vs. 2nd generation Polymerase Inhibitors Non nucleos(t)ides Polymerase Inhibitors nucleos(t)ides NS5A Inhibitors Potency Pan genotype efficacy Resistance Barrier Potency Pan genotype efficacy Resistance Barrier Potency Pan genotype efficacy Resistance Barrier Potency Pan genotype efficacy Resistance Barrier +++ +/++ +/++ + ++ + ( ) + ( ) + +++ +++ ++/+++ +++ +/++ +/++ Additional Issues: Issues: Drug-Drug Interactions, Dosing, Safety Safety (e.g. (e.g. Anemia, Rash) Rash)

Potential roles of future DAAs IFN-sparing treatment regimens (shorter treatment durations) Increase of SVR rates in difficult-to-treat patients (triple therapies, quadruple therapies) IFN-free treatment including patients who cannot be treated with IFNa with an an easy dosing schedule, reduced pill pill burden, less toxicity, effective in in all all genotypes,

Entry Inhibitors Advanced BMS Programs TLR Agonists Therapeutic Vaccine Other IFNs PEG IFN lambda PEG-IFN lambda Asunaprevir Protease Inhibitors Cyclophillin Inhibitors NS5A Inhibitors Polymeraseinhibitors NI Daclatasvir NNI

Asunaprevir (ASV, BMS 650032): NS3 Inhibitor Daclatasvir (DCV, BMS 790052): NS5A Inhibitor

GT 1 null responder: Asunaprevir and daclatasvir + peg-alfa/rbv study design SVR 4 SVR 12 SVR 24 SVR 48 n = 20 ASV 200 mg BID + DCV 60 mg QD + peg-alfa-2a/rbv (GT 1a/1b) Follow up n = 21 ASV 200 mg QD + DCV 60 mg QD + peg-alfa-2a/rbv (GT 1a/1b) Follow up Prior null responders to peg-alfa and RBV * ASV 200 mg BID + DCV 60 mg QD (GT 1b only) Follow up * ASV 200 mg QD + DCV 60 mg QD (GT 1b only) Follow up * ASV 200 mg BID + DCV 60 mg QD + RBV (GT 1a/1b) Follow up Week 12 Interim analysis Week 24 18 *SVR data not yet available; ASV= asunaprevir; DCV=daclatasvir; GT=genotype; peg-alfa=pegylated interferon alfa; RBV=ribavirin; SVR=sustained virological response Adapted from Lok A, et al. EASL 2012. Poster LB-1415.

IFN-sparing

GT 1 null responder: Asunaprevir and daclatasvir + peg-alfa/rbv virological response rates Patients achieving endpoint (%) 100 80 60 40 20 n= 95 * 95 * 100 100 100 75 71 20 21 95 95 90 100 95 90 100 20 21 20 21 20 21 95 ASV 200 mg BID + DCV + pegalfa/rbv ASV 200 mg QD + DCV + pegalfa/rbv Solid bars <LOD Hatched bars Detectable and <LLOQ 0 Week 4 Week 12 EOTR (Week 24) SVR 4 20 *1 patient with missing HCV-RNA measurement ASV=asunaprevir; DCV=daclatasvir; EOTR=end-of-treatment response; LOD=lower limit of detection (~10 IU/mL); LLOQ=lower limit of quantitation (25 IU/mL); peg-alfa=pegylated interferon alfa-2a; RBV=ribavirin; SVR=sustained virological response Adapted from Lok A, et al. EASL 2012. Poster LB-1415.

GT 1 null responder: Asunaprevir and daclatasvir + peg-alfa/rbv adverse events through Week 12 Event ASV 200 mg BID + DCV 60 mg QD + peg-alfa-2a/rbv (N=20) ASV 200 mg QD + DCV 60 mg QD + peg-alfa-2a/rbv (N=21) Total (N=41) Grade 3 4 AEs, n (%) 1 (5) 2 (10) Discontinuations due to AEs 3 (7) 0 0 0 SAEs 3 (15) 1 (5) 4 (10) Deaths 0 0 0 ASV and DCV in combination with peg-alfa/rbv were generally well tolerated The most common AEs were headache, asthenia, diarrhoea, alopecia, fatigue and irritability* No Grade 3 4 ALT elevations were reported 1 patient (ASV 200 mg BID) had AST >5 x ULN (Week 12) 4 patients (2 per study arm) had transient elevations of total bilirubin (peaking at Week 2) 21 *AEs occurring in 30% in either treatment arm; AE=adverse event; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; SAE=serious adverse event; peg-alfa=pegylated interferon alfa; RBV=ribavirin; ULN=upper limit of normal Adapted from Lok A, et al. EASL 2012. Poster LB-1415.

IFN-free

600 mg Asunaprevir 2xtgl. 60 mg Daclatasiavir 1xtgl. SVR: 2/9 genotype 1a 2/2 genotype 1b

GT 1b null responders and ineligible/intolerant: Daclatasvir + asunaprevir study design (Japan) Null responders (n=21) DCV 60 mg QD + ASV 200 mg BID * Ineligible/intolerant (n=22) DCV 60 mg QD + ASV 200 mg BID Follow up x 24 weeks Follow up x 24 weeks Week 4 (RVR) Week 12 (cevr) Week 24 (EOTR) SVR 12 SVR 24 Non-cirrhotic Japanese adults with HCV GT 1 infection, HCV-RNA 10 5 IU/mL Null responders: <2 log 10 HCV-RNA decline after 12 weeks of peg-alfa/rbv Ineligible/intolerant: previously intolerant to peg-alfa/rbv OR peg-alfa/rbv medically unsuitable Sentinel cohort of 10 null responders reported previously (SVR 24 90%); a results combined here with data for additional null responders 24 *ASV ASV=asunaprevir; initially 600 mg cevr=complete BID in sentinel early cohort virological of 10 null response; responders, DCV=daclatasvir reduced to 200 mg BID during treatment EOTR=end-of-treatment response; GT=genotype; RBV=ribavirin; peg-alfa=pegylated interferon alfa; RVR=rapid virological response; SVR=sustained virological response Adapted from Suzuki F, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 2344; a Chayama K, et al. Hepatology 2012;55:742 8.

GT 1b null responders and ineligible/intolerant: Daclatasvir + asunaprevir virological endpoints Null responders (N = 21) Ineligible/intolerant (N = 22) HCV-RNA undetectable (% of patients) 11/21 19/22 19/21 20/22 19/21 19/22 19/21 14/22 19/21 14/22 Week 4 RVR Week 12 cevr EOT * SVR 12 SVR 24 25 *EOT (end-of-treatment)=week 24 or last on-treatment visit for patients who discontinued early Intention to treat (missing=failure) analysis; RVR= rapid virological response; cevr=complete early virological response; SVR=sustained virological response; Lower limit of quantitation for HCV-RNA determinations=15 IU/mL Adapted from Suzuki F, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 2344.

GT 1b null responders and ineligible/intolerant: Daclatasvir + asunaprevir overall safety Adverse event profile generally compared favourably with the typical peg-alfa/rbv profile The most frequent AEs were headache, diarrhoea, nasopharyngitis and transaminase elevations 6 serious adverse events in 5 patients, no deaths 3 discontinuations due to adverse events before Week 24 Grade 4 hyperbilirubinaemia (Week 2) 2 transaminase elevations (Weeks 12 and 16) 1 discontinuation due to lymphopenia at Week 52 (off-study) in patient with peg-alfa/rbv added at Week 6 26 GT=genotype; peg-alfa=pegylated interferon alfa; RBV=ribavirin Suzuki F, et al. EASL 2012. Oral Presentation 2344.

Entry Inhibitors Asunaprevir Strategies towards cure of HCV infection: the future will be personalized medicine! Protease Inhibitors Cyclophillin Inhibitors NS5A Inhibitors Polymeraseinhibitors NI TLR Agonists Therapeutic Vaccine Other IFNs PEG IFN lambda Viral factors (e.g. genotype 1a vs. 1b vs. other) Host factors (Il28b genotype?) PEG-IFN lambda Stage of liver disease Previous therapies Comorbidities / DDI / Safety Resources,.. Daclatasvir NNI