Leonard M. Glassman MD

Similar documents
BI-RADS Update. Martha B. Mainiero, MD, FACR, FSBI Brown University Rhode Island Hospital

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

ACRIN 6666 IM Additional Evaluation: Additional Views/Targeted US

Leonard M. Glassman MD Analysis of Breast Calcifications

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Breast Imaging Lexicon

BI-RADS and Breast MRI. Kathy Borovicka, M.D. Thursday February 15, 2018

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

S. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels

ORIGINAL ARTICLE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAM WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION

AB MR Interpretation Overview

Lesion Imaging Characteristics Mass, Favoring Benign Circumscribed Margins Intramammary Lymph Node

MRI BI-RADS: How to make it out?

Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand

UW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications. BI-RADS 5 th Edition

OF HEMATOMA INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE

Radiology Review Course Hotel del Coronado Coronado, California

Criteria of Malignancy. Evaluation Score

Practical and illustrated summary of updated BI-RADS for ultrasonography

Diagnostic Dilemmas of Breast Imaging

Ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound, mammography and MRI features with pathologic correlation

Ana Sofia Preto 19/06/2013

UNC Breast Imaging Division July 2018

PLACE LABEL HERE. ACRIN 6657 MRI Form: Pre-Treatment (MRI-1)

Pitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI. Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania

Ultrasound of the Breast BASICS FOR THE ORDERING CLINICIAN

Non-mass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Aditi A. Desai, MD Margaret Ann Mays, MD

Breast Ultrasound: Improving Your Skills & Patient Care

8/31/2016 HIDING IN PLAIN SITE, ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS AND BREAST ASYMMETRIES ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS

Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI RSSA 2013

MEDICAL IMAGING AND BREAST DISEASE HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

Ultrasonography. Methods. Brief Description. Indications. Device-related Prerequisites. Technical Requirements. Evaluation Criteria

Imaging the Symptomatic Patient. Avice M.O Connell MD,FACR,FSBI Professor of Imaging Sciences Director, Women s Imaging University of Rochester

Alena Levit MD Avice O Connell MD University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

Breast imaging of benign fat containing lesions

Using T2-Weighted Sequences to More Accurately Characterize Breast Masses Seen on MRI

The radiologic workup of a palpable breast mass

Benign, Reactive and Inflammatory Lesions of the Breast

ISSN X (Print) Research Article. *Corresponding author Dr. Amlendu Nagar

Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography

OPTO-ACOUSTIC BREAST IMAGING

PLACE LABEL HERE BASELINE / PRE-TREATMENT. ACRIN 6657 Extension MRI Form: Baseline / Pre-Treatment MRI 1. o Unknown

CDIS: what's beyond microcalcifications? - Pictorial essay

Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients

Index. C Calcifications fat necrosis 1, 61 fat necrosis 4, 69 nipple/peri-areolar involvement 1, 165

Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips

MRI in breast cancer: diagnosis and intervention. Dr Sue Barter Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge UK

Triple-negative breast cancer: which typical features can we identify on conventional and MRI imaging?

Case Scenario 1 History and Physical 3/15/13 Imaging Pathology

Pictorial Essay Singapore Med J 2009; 50(9) :

AMSER Case of the Month: September 2018

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast:

Fat Necrosis: A Grand Imposter

Cystic Masses of the Breast

RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CANCER

Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma: Mammographic, Ultrasonographic, MRI and Pathologic Findings

Table 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds

Mimickers of breast malignancy

Hiding in Plain Sight / Site: Archictectural Distortions and Breast Asymmetries

Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast

BI-RADS MRI: A Primer

Breast calcification: Management and Pictorial Review

Pitfalls of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Mammography (DCE-MRM) in Evaluation of Post-Biopsy Suspicious Breast Lesions

Imaging of giant breast masses with pathological correlation

Contents. Basic Ultrasound Principles and Terminology. Ultrasound Nodule Characteristics

Policies, Standards, and Guidelines. Guidelines on Breast Ultrasound Examination and Reporting

Triple Receptor Negative Breast Cancer: Imaging and Clinical Characteristics

Case-based discussion:

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; spectrum of imaging findings.

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

Radiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions?

The role of MRI in assessment of asymmetrical breast densities

Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorder Unit Regina Apostolorum Hospital

of Thyroid Lesions Comet Tail Crystals

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2016: Vol.-6, Issue- 1, P

Breast Pathology in Men: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant

Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant

Segmental Breast Calcifications

Breast Health. Learning Objectives. Breast Anatomy. Poll Question. Breast Anatomy

Cairo/EG, Khartoum/SD, London/UK Biological effects, Diagnostic procedure, Ultrasound, Mammography, Breast /ecr2015/C-0107

Here are examples of bilateral analog mammograms from the same patient including CC and MLO projections.

Malignant transformation of fibroadenomas

and verbal and/or written consent was obtained from each of the patient at each visit during which their database was

BI-RADS 3 category, a pain in the neck for the radiologist which technique detects more cases?

Ultrasound 5/1/2017. Ultrasound in the FNA Clinic. Uses of Ultrasound Outside of. Cardiology

Pathologic outcomes of coarse heterogeneous calcifications detected on mammography

Automated Breast Volume Scanner: 3D-Ultrasound of breast lesions

SIGNIFICANT OTHERS. Miscellaneous Benign Breast Conditions

Automated Breast Volume Scanner: 3D-Ultrasound of breast lesions

National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

Breast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD!

Current Imaging Diagnosis of the Breast Tumors

MRI features of Triple-negative breast cancer: our experience.

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Radiological Appearances of Male Breast Disease

Evaluation of Abnormal Screening Mammograms

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

Transcription:

BI-RADS The New BI-RADS Leonard M. Glassman MD FACR Former Chief of Breast Imaging American Institute for Radiologic Pathology Washington Radiology Associates, PC Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5 th Edition 4 th edition in 2003 Dated 2013 Released 2014 Sections Mammography Ultrasound MRI Follow-up and outcome monitoring Data dictionary Mammography Mammography Masses Calcifications Architectural distortion Asymmetries Intramammary lymph nodes Skin lesions Solitary dilated duct Breast Density Mass A Fatty B Scattered fibroglandular densities C Heterogeneously dense which may obscure small masses D Extremely dense which lowers the sensitivity of mammography Uses letters not numbers for categories Percentages are dropped 3-dimensional Seen in 2 projections Convex border Denser in the center 1

Mass Shape Mass Margin Oval (+/- 2-3 undulations) Round Irregular Lobulated is dropped and included in oval Circumscribed <25% obscured 0% indistinct, microlobulated, or spiculated Obscured Microlobulated Indistinct Spiculated Mass Density Calcifications High 70% cancer Equal Low Fat containing Typically benign Suspicious Merged intermediate and high probability suspicious into suspicious Typically Benign Suspicious Skin Vascular Coarse or popcorn-like Large rods Round <1 mm round <0.5 mm punctate Rim Includes egg shell and lucent centered Dystrophic Milk of calcium Suture Amorphous 21% malignant Coarse heterogeneous 13% malignant Fine pleomorphic 29% malignant Fine linear or fine linear branching 70% malignant 2

Diffuse Regional (>2 cm) 26% malignant Grouped (<2 cm) 31% malignant Linear 60% malignant Segmental 62% malignant Clustered changed to grouped Distribution Diffuse Regional (>2 cm) 26% malignant Grouped (<2 cm) 31% malignant Linear 60% malignant Segmental 62% malignant Distribution Architectural Distortion Asymmetries Asymmetry Global asymmetry > 1 quadrant Focal asymmetry < 1 quadrant Developing asymmetry 15% malignant Asymmetry Global asymmetry > 1 quadrant Focal asymmetry < 1 quadrant Developing asymmetry 15% malignant Asymmetries Asymmetry >80% summation Global asymmetry > 1 quadrant BI-RADS 2 if not palpable Focal asymmetry < 1 quadrant BI-RADS 3 with negative workup Developing asymmetry 15% malignant BI-RADS 4 Asymmetries 3

Intramammary Lymph Node Skin Lesion Solitary Dilated Duct Category 3 10% malignant (?) <2% malignant Used to establish stability Circumscribed noncalcified solid mass No need to biopsy young woman with probable fibroadenoma Focal asymmetry Solitary group of punctate calcifications? for palpable lesions Only used after diagnostic work-up Not if new or enlarging Category 3 Mammography Summary Six month unilateral (or bilateral) 1 year bilateral 2 year bilateral +/- 3 year bilateral 18 month follow-up dropped Breast density A thru D. No percentages used Lobulated mass is included in oval Calcifications are typically benign or suspicious Clustered is now called grouped Probable fibroadenoma is now BIRADS 3 not 4 18 month follow-up is dropped 4

Ultrasound Ultrasound Tissue Composition Only for screening Homogeneous background fat Homogeneous background fibroglandular Heterogeneous background Ultrasound Ultrasound Masses Calcifications Associated features Architectural distortion Duct changes Skin changes Edema Vascularity Elasticity Special Cases Simple cyst Clustered microcysts Complicated cyst Skin mass Foreign body Intramammary lymph node Axillary lymph node Vascular abnormality Postsurgical fluid collection Fat necrosis Mass Mass Shape Shape Orientation Margin Echo pattern Posterior features No more lesion boundary Oval (+/- 2-3 undulations) Round Irregular Lobulated shapes deleted 5

Mass Orientation Margin Parallel (to the skin) Not parallel Includes round Circumscribed Not circumscribed Indistinct Angular Microlobulated Spiculated Do not use irregular here; it is a mass shape not a margin Echo Pattern Echo Pattern Anechoic Hyperechoic Complex cystic and solid Hypoechoic Isoechoic Heterogeneous Anechoic Hyperechoic Complex cystic and solid Hypoechoic Isoechoic Heterogeneous Posterior features Posterior features No posterior features Enhancement Shadowing Combined pattern No posterior features Enhancement Shadowing Combined pattern 6

Calcifications Associated Features In a mass Outside a mass Intraductal Architectural distortion Duct changes Skin changes Retraction Thickening Edema Vascularity Elasticity Special Cases Category 3 Simple cyst Clustered microcysts Complicated cyst Skin mass Foreign body Intramammary lymph node Axillary lymph node Vascular Postsurgical fluid Fat necrosis Solid oval circumscribed parallel mass Can be palpable in <40 years old Isolated complicated cyst Clustered microcysts Category 2 if very well seen and all cystic Category 3 Ultrasound Summary Six month unilateral (or bilateral) 1 year bilateral 2 year bilateral Lesion boundary is dropped from shape evaluation Lobulated shape is now part of oval Round mass is not parallel orientation Probable fibroadenoma is BIRADS 3 not 4 18 month follow-up dropped 7

MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) Evaluated on first series after contrast Not related to amount of fibroglandular tissue present Does not hinder detection of carcinoma Try to do in follicular phase when elective Do not delay with new diagnosis of cancer BPE Classes Focus Minimal Mild Moderate Marked <5mm Too small to characterize No corresponding noncontrast finding Focus Mass Shape Benign Not unique Possible fatty hilum Persistent kinetics Bright on T2 Stable if prior exam Malignant Unique and distinct No fatty hilum Washout kinetics Increased or new from prior exam Oval (includes lobulated) Round Irregular Mass shape and margin best evaluated on first postcontrast series 8

Mass Margin Internal Mass Enhancement Circumscribed Not circumscribed Irregular Spiculated Homogeneous Heterogeneous Non-enhancing dark internal septations Fibroadenoma if other characteristics benign Non-Mass Enhancement (NME) Non-Mass Enhancement (NME) Neither mass or focus NME Distribution NME Internal Enhancement Focal < 1 quadrant Single duct system Linear Line or single duct Segmental Regional > 1 quadrant Multiple regions Diffuse Homogeneous Heterogeneous Clumped Clustered ring Ductal included now in linear 9

Kinetic Curve Assessment MRI Summary Initial phase is first 2 minutes Slow (<50% enhancement) Medium (50-100%) Fast (>100%) Delayed phase is after 2 minutes Persistant Plateau (+/_ 10%) Washout Ductal NME now included in linear Clustered ring is a new NME internal enhancement descriptor Summary An attempt has been made to use the same descriptors for each modality where possible. There has been an uncoupling of the assessment categories and the treatment or follow-up recommendations. Some descriptors have been merged for simplicity 10