Conflict of interest statement

Similar documents
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter?

Events after discontinuation of randomized treatment at the end of the ARISTOTLE trial

Increased Levels of D-dimer in Atrial Fibrillation Identify Patients With Higher Risk of Thromboembolic Events and Death

New oral factor Xa inhibitors. Lessons from AVERROES and ARISTOTLE trials

Thrombosis and Thromboembolsim October Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Risk Stratification and Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy

What s New in the AF Guidelines

Lessons from recent antithrombotic studies and trials in atrial fibrillation

Online Appendix (JACC )

Analysing Apixaban: Potential Growth Driver for Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. Tro Kalayjian Chief Medical Analyst Chimera Research Group

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

Scoring Systems in AF 8/10/2016. Strategies in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Strokes. Overview

Stepheny Sumrall, FNP, AGACNP Cardiovascular Clinic of Hattiesburg

NeuroPI Case Study: Anticoagulant Therapy

Identification of patients with heart failure and PREserved systolic Function : an Epidemiologic Regional study

HEART FAILURE: PHARMACOTHERAPY UPDATE

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2018

Is Apixaban Effective for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation?

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2016

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodeling and function:

Treatment strategy decision tree

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

Geriatric Grand Rounds

FINAL CDEC RECOMMENDATION

Subclinical AF: Implications of device based episodes

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart failure

Professor DA Fitzmaurice Primary Care Clinical Sciences University of Birmingham

Aims. AF and Stroke risk Guidance re anticoagulation Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular AF (NVAF) Practical Issues Patient Case Studies

Troponin I elevation increases the risk of death and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation a RE-LY substudy. Ziad Hijazi, MD

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

Controversies in Atrial Fibrillation and HF

IS THERE STILL A PLACE FOR VITAMINE K ANTAGONISTS?

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Irbesartan (Aprovel) for prevention of cardiovascular complications in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

A Patient with Chest Pain and Atrial Fibrillation

Current Guideline for AF Treatment. Young Keun On, MD, PhD, FHRS Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Irbesartan (Aprovel) for heart failure with preserved systolic function. August 2008

Medical Apps for Cardiology Uses. There s an App for That!

Atrial fibrillation and advanced age

Managing Atrial Fibrillation in the Heart Failure Patient

Atrial Fibrillation Implementation challenges. Lesley Edgar Ross Maconachie

Apixaban for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodeling and function:

Engage AF-TIMI 48. Edoxaban in AF: What can we expect? Cardiology Update John Camm. St. George s University of London United Kingdom

ACC/AHA/Physician Consortium Clinical Performance Measures for Adults with Nonvalvular Atria Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter

Prof. Fiorenzo Gaita

The Failing Heart in Primary Care

Cost and Prevalence of A fib. Atrial Fibrillation: Guideline Directed Treatment. Prevalence of A Fib. Risk Factors for A Fib. Risk Factors for A Fib

Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation in 2017

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

What s new in 2016 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology? HEART FAILURE. Marc Ferrini (Lyon Fr)

Disclosure. Objectives. New Anticoagulants 6/5/2014 GHASSAN HADDAD M.D FHM. South Miami hospital Director of the Anticoagulation clinic.

» A new drug s trial

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Atrial Fibrillation Management in the ED. J Fisher May 2014"

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Patient with high risk for bleeding

ARISTOTLE Demonstrated that ELIQUIS is the First Oral Anticoagulant to Significantly Reduce All-Cause Death

ESC Stockholm Arrhythmias & pacing

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Drugs acting on the reninangiotensin-aldosterone

Relevant Advances in Atrial Fibrillation

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Tools which estimate the risk of stroke in patients with. Original Article

Basics of Atrial Fibrillation. By Mini Thannikal NP-BC Mount Sinai St Luke s Hospital New York, NY

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

HERTFORDSHIRE MEDICINES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (HMMC) DABIGATRAN RECOMMENDED What it is Indications Date decision last revised

Atrial Fibrillation and the NOAC s. John Raymond MS, PA-C, MHP February 10, 2018

MMS/Mass Coalition Program, Nov. 4, 2008 Patients with AF: Who Should be on Warfarin?

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Primary Prevention of Stroke

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

Apixaban versus Heparin/Vitamin K Antagonist in Anticoagulation-naïve Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Scheduled for Cardioversion: The EMANATE Trial

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting 경북대의전원내과조용근

HF-PEF: Symptoms, quality of life and mortality/morbidity

Relationship between Center Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results from the ROCKET AF Trial

Coronary Heart Disease

Apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. August 2010

Atrial Fibrillaiton and Heart Failure: Anticoagulation therapy in all cases?

Atrial Fibrillation Topics for Today. Clinical Controversies Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation in the ER Topics for Today

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: REVISITING CONTROVERSIES IN AN ERA OF INNOVATION

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

Heart failure hospitalizations with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

Atrial fibrillation: current approaches to management

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Catheter-based mitral valve repair MitraClip System

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Cause or a Consequence

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

Efficacy of beta-blockers in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation: An individual patient data meta-analysis

A patient with decompensated HF

Heart Failure with Preserved EF (HFPEF) Epidemiology and management

Transcription:

Risk of stroke, systemic embolism or death according to heart failure and left ventricular function status in patients with atrial fibrillation: results of the ARISTOTLE trial J.J.V. McMurray 1, B. Lewis 2, J. Ezekowitz 3, B. Gersh 4, R.D. Lopes 5, D. Wojdyla 5, P. Mohan 6, L. Wallentin 7, J.H. Alexander 5, C.B. Granger 5, 1 University of Glasgow - Glasgow - United Kingdom, 2 Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center - Haifa - Israel, 3 University of Alberta - Edmonton - Canada, 4 Mayo Clinic - Rochester - United States of America, 5 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center - Durham - United States of America, 6 Bristol-Myers Squibb - Princeton - United States of America, 7 Uppsala University, UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center - Uppsala - Sweden, on behalf of the ARISTOTLE investigators

Conflict of interest statement My employer, Glasgow University, has been paid by BMS/Pfizer for my time spent as a member of the ARISTOTLE Executive Committee. I have received funding from BMS/Pfizer for travel and accommodation in relation to ARISTOTLE Executive Committee meetings.

Background: the relationship between atrial fibrillation and heart failure Patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation have worse heart failure outcomes than heart failure patients in sinus rhythm Patients with atrial fibrillation and LV systolic dysfunction, heart failure or both are believed to have higher thromboembolism rates than AF patients without either LV systolic dysfunction or heart failure Comparison of apixaban and warfarin for prevention of stroke (and systemic embolism) in patients with atrial fibrillation AND heart failure, LV systolic dysfunction or both in the ARISTOTLE trial

ARISTOTLE trial

ARISTOTLE design: AF with at least one additional risk factor for stroke Inclusion risk factors Age 75 years Prior stroke, TIA, or SE HF or LVEF 40% Diabetes mellitus Hypertension Randomize double blind, double dummy (n = 18,201) Major exclusion criteria Mechanical prosthetic valve Severe renal insufficiency Need for aspirin plus thienopyridine Apixaban 5 mg oral twice daily (2.5 mg BID in selected patients) Warfarin (target INR 2-3) Warfarin/warfarin placebo adjusted by INR/sham INR based on encrypted point-of-care testing device Primary outcome: stroke or systemic embolism Hierarchical testing: non-inferiority for primary outcome, superiority for primary outcome, major bleeding, death

Current analysis: Outcomes according to LV function and HF status No HF or LVSD HF-PEF LVSD

ARISTOTLE: definition of heart failure and LV systolic dysfunction Patients: Only those with a report of both HF status and LV function were included in this analysis. Of the 18,201 patients randomized in ARISTOTLE, 14,671 (81%) had information on both HF status and LV systolic function Definition of HF: Inclusion criteria page ( symptomatic congestive heart failure within 3 months ) and the Cardiovascular disease history page ( Does the subject have symptomatic congestive heart failure? ) Definition of LVSD: was obtained from the Inclusion criteria page ( left ventricular dysfunction with an EF 40% by echocardiography, radionuclide study or contrast angiography ) and the Assessment of left ventricular function page, which recorded EF or LV dysfunction category (normal, mild, moderate or severe), if an evaluation LV function had been made

ARISTOTLE: analysis of outcomes according to HF status and LV systolic function Patients were divided into 3 categories: Patients with LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD), with or without HF; LVSD was defined as an EF 40% or a report of moderate or severe LV systolic dysfunction (n=2,736) Patients with HF and preserved EF (>40%), normal LV function or mild LV systolic dysfunction, collectively referred to as HF with preserved EF (HF-PEF) (n= 3,207) Patients with no HF and an EF >40% or normal LV function, i.e. with neither LVSD nor HF-PEF (n= 8,728) The effect of apixaban compared with warfarin was examined for the pre-specified efficacy and safety outcomes in each of these patient categories

Baseline characteristics No HF or LVSD HF-PEF LVSD

ARISTOTLE: Baseline characteristics according to LV systolic function and HF status No LVSD/no HF (n=8728) HF-PEF (n=3207) LVSD (n=2736) P value Age (yr) 71 69 68 <0.0001 Age 75 yr (%) 33.7 25.3 23.4 <0.0001 Female (%) 35.2 42.2 21.3 <0.0001 Systolic BP (mmhg) 130 130 126 <0.0001 Diabetes (%) 25.0 25.2 26.9 0.1313 Hypertension (%) 89.9 88.9 75.3 <0.0001 MI (%) 10.7 17.8 27.9 <0.0001 Stroke/TIA (%) 19.6 17.5 15.8 <0.0001 LBBB (%) 2.9 4.9 11.4 <0.0001 Type of AF (%) Paroxysmal Persistent/permanent 18.8 81.2 14.8 85.2 10.8 89.2 <0.0001 <0.0001

ARISTOTLE: Baseline characteristics according to LV systolic function and HF status NYHA Class (%) I II III IV No LVSD/no HF (n=8728) 73.2 24.4 2.3 0.1 HF-PEF (n=3207) 16.5 61.6 21.2 0.7 LVSD (n=2736) 26.7 50.2 21.9 1.2 P value <0.0001 LVEF (%) 60 56 35 <0.0001 Creatinine clearance (ml/min) > 80 > 50 80 > 30 50 30 CHADS 1 2 3 42.2 42.5 14.3 1.0 44.5 33.3 22.2 43.5 39.4 14.9 2.2 8.9 43.8 47.4 41.4 40.5 16.2 1.9 29.4 36.0 34.6 <0.0001 <0.0001 Mean CHADS 1.88 2.67 2.22 <0.0001

ARISTOTLE: Baseline characteristics according to LV systolic function and HF status No LVSD/no HF (n=8728) HF-PEF (n=3207) LVSD (n=2736) P value Diuretic 45.8 69.7 72.8 <0.0001 ACE inhibitor or ARB 66.5 77.1 80.6 <0.0001 Amiodarone 9.3 13.0 15.2 <0.0001 Beta-blocker 61.7 68.6 74.7 <0.0001 Aldosterone antagonist 0.5 1.4 2.3 <0.0001 Digoxin 24.1 39.2 47.5 <0.0001 CCB 37.2 26.4 15.7 <0.0001 Statin 46.2 37.5 43.3 <0.0001 Aspirin 30.0 32.0 34.3 <0.0001

Outcomes (irrespective of treatment assignment) No HF or LVSD HF-PEF LVSD

ARISTOTLE: Efficacy outcomes according to LV systolic function and HF status No LVSD/no HF (N=8728) HF-PEF (N=3207) LVSD (N=2736) Rate* Rate* HR Rate* HR P value SSE 1.37 1.52 1.11 (0.87,1.42) 1.39 1.01 (0.77,1.33) 0.705 SSE or death 3.46 5.32 1.54 (1.34,1.77) 8.06 2.33 (2.05,2.65) <0.0001 SSE, MI or death 3.85 5.63 1.46 (1.28,1.67) 8.70 2.26 (2.00,2.56) <0.0001 *per 100 patient years compared with no LVSD/no HF group

ARISTOTLE: Adjusted rates of SSE No LVSD/no HF HF-PEF LVSD P value (N=8728) (N=3207) (N=2736) Rate* Rate* HR Rate* HR SSE 1.38 1.58 1.15 (0.89,1.48) 1.53 1.10 (0.84,1.46) 0.52 * per 100 patient years adjusted for age, sex, HT, DM, Stroke/TIA, CHD, BMI, egfr compared with no LVSD/no HF group

ARISTOTLE: Heart failure hospitalization No LVSD/no HF (N=8728) HF-PEF (N=3207) LVSD (N=2736) P value Rate* Rate* HR Rate* HR SSE 1.37 1.52 1.11 (0.87,1.42) 1.39 1.01 (0.77,1.33) 0.705 SSE or death 3.46 5.32 1.54 (1.34,1.77) 8.06 2.33 (2.05,2.65) <0.0001 SSE, MI or death 3.85 5.63 1.46 (1.28,1.67) 8.70 2.26 (2.00,2.56) <0.0001 HF hospitalization 1.12 3.24 2.77 (2.26,3.40) 5.99 5.07 (4.21,6.11) <0.0001 *per 100 patient years compared with no LVSD/no HF group investigator reported

ARISTOTLE: Bleeding outcomes according to LV systolic function and HF status No LVSD/no HF (N=8728) HF-PEF (N=3207) LVSD (N=2736) P value Rate* Rate* HR Rate* HR Major bleeding 2.50 2.55 1.02 (0.84,1.24) 3.09 1.23 (1.01,1.50) 0.114 SSE, major bleeding or death 5.27 7.24 1.37 (1.22,1.54) 10.46 1.98 (1.77,2.22) <0.0001 *per 100 patient years compared with no LVSD/no HF group

Outcomes (according to treatment assignment) No HF or LVSD HF-PEF LVSD

Event rate ARISTOTLE: SSE or death according to LV systolic function and HF status 0.20 Warfarin Apixaban 0.15 0.10 LVSD HF-PEF No LVSD/HF P for interaction = 0.63 0.05 0.00 0 6 12 18 24 Months since randomization

Event rate ARISTOTLE: SSE, major bleeding or death according to LV systolic function and HF status 0.20 0.15 LVSD HF-PEF No LVSD/no HF Warfarin Apixaban P for interaction = 0.59 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 6 12 18 24 Months since randomization

ARISTOTLE: outcomes according to HF status and LV systolic function summary and conclusions Patients with atrial fibrillation and LV systolic dysfunction or HF-PEF have worse outcomes than AF patients without either LV systolic dysfunction or HF primarily because of their higher mortality rate Those with LVSD have a worse outcome than those with HF-PEF Overall, patients treated with apixaban had better outcomes than those treated with warfarin lower rates of SSE, SSE or death, death, major bleeding and SSE, major bleeding or death Baseline LVSD or HF-PEF did not modify the effect of apixaban