Age of Drinking Onset, Driving After Drinking, and Involvement in Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes

Similar documents
IN 1998, THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL of

Transitions To and From At-Risk Alcohol Use In Adults In the United States

BRIEF REPORT FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH UNTREATED REMISSIONS FROM ALCOHOL ABUSE OR DEPENDENCE

Survey of U.S. Drivers about Marijuana, Alcohol, and Driving

Initial Report of Oregon s State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup. Prepared by:

The Determination and Implication of Minimum Legal Drinking Age. MLDA, short for Minimum Legal Drinking Age, was set to twenty-one years old by

REVISED. Stanislaus County 2007

Norberg et al. Long-Term Effects of Minimum Drinking Age Laws on Past-Year Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2009

EFFECTIVENESS OF RAISING THE DRINKING AGE TO 21 IN ALL STATES IN THE U.S.

REVISED. Humboldt County 2007

REVISED. Tulare County 2007

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention

REVISED. Inyo County 2007

Among Coflege Students*

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Mendocino County 2010

Contra Costa County 2010

Keywords review literature, motor vehicles, accidents, traffic, automobile driving, alcohol drinking

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Santa Clara County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

El Dorado County 2010

Riverside County 2010

Stanislaus County 2010

San Francisco County 2010

Crash Risk of Alcohol Impaired Driving

San Bernardino County 2010

San Joaquin County 2010

San Luis Obispo County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

The Risk of Alcohol-Related Traffic Events and Recidivism Among Young Offenders A Theoretical Approach

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

The Unexpected Public Health Effects of the 21 Drinking Age

Women and Substance Abuse in Nevada. A Special Report

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Reducing Alcohol-impaired Driving: Maintaining Current Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) Laws

In 1987, Vermont introduced a 21-year-old drinking law which. prohibited alcohol use by those born on or after July 1, 1969, but allowed

Development and Analysis of a Drug and Alcohol Driving Awareness Program

CONSEQUENCES OF MARIJUANA USE FOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS. Master s Thesis. Submitted to: Department of Sociology

Prevalence of Youth Access to Alcohol or a Gun in the Home

Prevalence of cannabis-impaired driving and crash risk

National Drunk Driving Enforcement Crackdown

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention

Alcohol Use and Related Behaviors

Youth Involvement In Traffic Accidents In Japan-New Trends

Long-Term Effects of Minimum Drinking Age Laws on Past-Year Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders

Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and Marijuana: Beliefs and Behaviors, United States,

Comment on Low BAC Policies: Results and Mechanisms

REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE PREVENTION AND REDUCTION OF UNDERAGE DRINKING

Recreational marijuana and collision claim frequencies

The Dilemma of Underage Drinking in Indiana

Driving Drunk, Driving High: A Comparison of Student Attitudes Towards Driving while Drunk Versus Driving while High on Cannabis

How Safe Are Our Roads? 2016 Checkpoint Strikeforce campaign poster celebrating real area cab drivers as being Beautiful designated sober drivers.

DUI Arrests, BAC at the Time of Arrest and Offender Assessment Test Results for Alcohol Problems

EMERGENCY ROOM AND PRIMARY CARE SERVICES UTILIZATION AND ASSOCIATED ALCOHOL AND DRUG USE IN THE UNITED STATES GENERAL POPULATION

ALCOHOL USE 2011 SURVEY RESULTS REPORT AND RELATED BEHAVIORS. Figure 1 n Trends in current alcohol use, Grades 9 12, New Mexico,

KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2005 MYRBS

Initial Report of Oregon s State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup. Prepared by:

Youth Initiatives and Efforts to Reduce Underage Drinking

The Worldwide Decline in Drinking and Driving

Drug Driving in NSW: evidence-gathering, enforcement and education

Accessibility and Consumption of Alcoholic Drinks in Metro Manila Colleges and Universities

Survey of Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use (SDD) among young people in England, Andrew Bryant

Marijuana Use and Perception Compared to Other Substances among High School Students in Denver, CO in 2013 & 2015 Healthy Kids Colorado Survey (HKCS)

MAGNITUDE OF ALCOHOL-RELATED MORTALITY

The Severity of Pedestrian Injuries in Alcohol-Related Collisions

Trends in Impaired Driving in the United States: How to Resume Progress

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities

Nebraska Young Adult Alcohol Opinion Survey State Summary Report

The New England Journal of Medicine

HAZARDOUS DRINKING AND alcohol-related problems

Alcohol Use and Related Behaviors

Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics

Youth ATOD Survey 2013 Combined Report A Summary of Key Findings

DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE

Substance use has declined or stabilized since the mid-1990s.

The End of the Decline in Drink Driving in Britain?

Road safety. Tool 1 COMMUNITY TOOLS

HOW SAFE ARE OUR ROADS?

Objectively Derived and Self-Reported Measures of Driving Exposure and Patterns Among Older Adults: AAA LongROAD Study

Traffic Crash Victimizations of California Children and Teenagers by Drinking Over-21 Drivers

INTOXICATED DRIVING PROGRAM 2009 STATISTICAL SUMMARY REPORT

Substance Abuse in Washington, D.C.

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention

Depressive Symptoms Among Colorado Farmers 1

DRUG- AND ALCOHOL-INVOLVED DRIVING: FINDINGS FROM A TELEPHONE SURVEY IN NEW YORK STATE, 1986

Nutrition and Physical Activity

Student Alcohol Use at The University of Montana NCHA Key Findings and Comparisons to National Reference Data

Predictors & Training

Effects of Restaurant and Bar Smoking Regulations on Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke Among Massachusetts Adults

The Effectiveness of Drinking-and-Driving Policies in the American States: A Cross-Sectional Time Series Analysis for

ABSTRACT. recent decades. This change is concerning because existing knowledge suggests that

Maryland Epidemiological Profiles on Alcohol

Introducing a Global Maximum BAC Standard: Why It Matters

Substance Abuse Trends in Maine. Epidemiological Profile Central District

Co-occurrence of Substance Use Behaviors in Youth

2012 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2011 Parent Survey Report

Transcription:

Title: Age of Drinking Onset, Driving After Drinking, and Involvement in Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes Author(s): Affiliation: Hingson, R., Heeren, T., Levenson, S., Jamanka, A., Voas, R. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston Presenting author s address: Albany Street TW, Boston, MA 8 Keywords: Alcohol; drinking onset, driving after drinking, motor vehicle crashes Body of paper: Abstract Objectives. To assess whether earlier drinking onset relates to drunk driving and alcohol related crash involvement over the life course. Methods. A national survey asked,8 respondents the age they started drinking, whether they drove after drinking too much, and were in motor vehicle accidents because of their drinking. Results. The earlier the age respondents started drinking, the more likely they were to report driving after drinking too much and being in a motor vehicle crash because of their drinking even after adjusting for current/ever diagnosis of alcohol dependence and other characteristics and behaviors associated with the age respondents started drinking. Conclusion. Traffic safety benefits of delaying drinking may extend well beyond the legal drinking age of. Introduction: Traffic crashes are the leading cause of death in the U.S. between ages and 9% of fatal crashes are alcohol related. In 998,,9 persons died in alcohol related crashes and at least, were injured. To reduce alcohol related fatal crashes among youth, all states have adopted a minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) of. States adopting MLDAs of in the early 98s experienced a % decline in alcohol related traffic deaths among drivers in the targeted ages compared with states that did not adopt such laws. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has estimated that the MLDA of prevents - traffic deaths annually among persons under, and over 8, traffic deaths among persons under have been prevented since 9. MLDA laws not only decreased drinking among persons under age, they also lowered drinking among people age to who grew up in states with MLDAs of relative to those who grew up in other states. However, it is not known whether these laws and other efforts to reduce underage drinking, lower driving after drinking, and alcohol related motor vehicle crash involvement later in life.

A recent analysis of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES) found that persons who began drinking regularly before age compared to those who started at age or older were three times more likely to develop diagnosable alcohol dependence during their life. Questions in that survey permit us to explore whether age of drinking onset is similarly related to whether respondents, ever in their life, and specifically during the year prior to the survey have - driven a motor vehicle after having too much to drink; and - been in a motor vehicle crash because of their drinking. independent of factors such as alcohol dependence that are related to early age of drinking onset. Materials and Methods: The National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES) conducted in person interviews with,8 respondents age 8 and older in the contiguous United States in 99, mean age. The multi-stage sampling design was described by Massey. The survey household response rate was 9.9 percent and the person response rate was 9. percent. Fieldwork was conducted by the Bureau of the Census. To provide a representative sample of the U.S. adult population. weighting using SUDAAN adjusted for deliberate oversampling of Blacks and persons under 9 8. Outcome measures Driving after drinking was explored by asking respondents, In your entire life, did you ever drive a car, motorcycle, truck or boat, or other vehicle after having too much to drink? Did that happen in the past months? Alcohol related crash involvement was explored by asking respondents, In your entire life, did you ever have a car, motorcycle, truck, boat, or other accident because of your drinking? Did that happen in the past months? Independent variables Age of drinking onset was determined by asking respondents, About how old were you when you first started drinking, not counting small tastes or sips of alcohol? For analysis, age of drinking onset was categorized as under, each year separately from through, and or older. The following demographic and behavior variables were examined as potential confounders of the association between age of drinking onset and later behavior: current age, sex, race/ethnicity (white non-hispanic, black non-hispanic, hispanic, other), education, marital status, smoking status (current, former, never), illicit drug use status (current, former, never) and alcohol dependency (current, former, never). Alcohol dependency was determined along DSM-IV guidelines through the AUDADIS structured diagnostic interview. Statistical Analysis All statistical analyses were conducted using the SUDAAN statistical package to account for the complex survey design and oversampling of NLAES in the estimation of both effects and their standard errors. We focused on respondents who reported drinking ever in their lifetime (n=,8). The univariate associations between age of drinking onset and drinking and driving outcomes and demographic and background behavior characteristics was tested using a modified chi square analysis that adjusts for the sampling design. Logistic regression explored whether age of drinking onset was associated with each of the drinking and driving outcomes, controlling for potential confounding from demographic and behavior characteristics including alcohol dependency. The overall significance of the relations between different ages of drinking onset and study outcomes in the logistic models were tested through a chi-square statistic comparing models with and without the set of indicator variables representing age of onset. We examined whether the potential association between age of drinking onset and drinking and driving outcomes persisted after controlling for alcohol dependence because of the established relationships between alcohol dependence and drinking and driving and between age of drinking onset and alcohol dependency. 8 We also examined the potential relationships between age of drinking onset and drinking and driving behavior in the subset of respondents who were never alcohol dependent (n=,).

Results: Sixty-five percent of respondents ever drank alcohol, 9% before age and % before age. The mean drinking onset age was 9. years. Four percent were classified as alcohol dependent in the past year and % ever in their life. Twenty-three percent of respondents reported driving a motor vehicle after having too much to drink ever in their life and five percent in the past year. Four percent of respondents reported ever having been in a motor vehicle crash because of their drinking,.% in the past year. The earlier the age respondents began drinking, the greater the proportions who reported driving after drinking too much and motor vehicle crash involvement because of drinking ever in their lives and during the year prior to the survey. (Figures and ) Male respondents, younger respondents, those with less than a high school education, persons never married, and persons who currently or ever smoked or used illicit drugs and respondents with a current (past year) or lifetime diagnoses of alcohol dependence were significantly more likely to have begun drinking at earlier ages (all relations p<.; data available upon request). To control for these potentially confounding characteristics, we entered each of those background characteristics into a series of multiple logistic regression analyses examining the following outcomes as dichotomous variables: whether or not respondents drove after drinking too much, or were in a motor vehicle accident because of their drinking. Each of these outcomes was examined ever during the respondent s life and during the year prior to the interview. Respondents who began drinking at an earlier age were significantly more likely to report that they drove after drinking too much ever and in the past year. Further, they were significantly more likely to have ever been involved in a motor vehicle accident after drinking too much. For each study outcome, the odds ratio and 9% confidence intervals for respondents who began drinking each year from less than age through relative to those who began at age or older was examined separately. Results are summarized in Figures and. The strongest relationships were observed when comparing respondents who started drinking at age relative to those starting at age and older. Persons who began drinking when they were age were. (9% CI.,.) times more likely than those who began after age to report ever driving after drinking too much and. (.8,.) times more likely to do so in the year prior to the survey. Further, they were. times more likely to report being in a motor vehicle crash after drinking too much ever (9% CI.8,.8) and in the past year (9% CI.,.9). As can be seen in the figures, these relationships tended to weaken as the age of drinking onset became closer to age. Nonetheless, respondents who began drinking in each age group under relative to those starting after age were significantly more likely to report ever driving after drinking too much and ever being in a motor vehicle crash after drinking too much. We also repeated the logistic regression analysis examining only the subgroup of respondents who drank but never experienced alcohol dependence (n=,). Just over half the sample, this group represented % of those who reported motor vehicle crashes after too much drinking ever during their life and 8% of those reporting such crashes in the year prior to the interview. Those who started drinking in each age group under were significantly more likely than those who started drinking after age to have ever and in the past year been in a motor vehicle crash after drinking too much. Data available upon request. Discussion: Previous studies have shown that raising the legal drinking age to reduced drinking and alcohol related motor vehicle crash involvement among persons under age., Prior research also indicated that persons who were living in states with a legal drinking age of not only drank less when they were under age, but also when they were age to. This study found that the earlier the age respondents started drinking, the more likely

they were to report driving after drinking too much ever in their life and in the past year. Also the earlier the age of drinking onset, the greater the likelihood the respondents reported being in a motor vehicle crash because of their drinking even after we analytically controlled for characteristics and behaviors associated with earlier drinking onset: whether or not respondents ever or currently had an alcohol dependence diagnosis, age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, marital status, smoking, or illicit drug use. A -fold increased alcohol related crash risk for those who began drinking at age relative to those who started after age was found ever in a respondent s life and during the year of the survey suggesting the relationship may not be purely a function of having a longer period of alcohol exposure. It is possible that people who engage in a variety of deviant or illegal behaviors at an early age are more likely to engage in several such behaviors later in life. Also, these results were based on self-report in a cross-sectional survey, not in a prospective study following respondents from the time of drinking onset. However, questions were worded in a way that suggests the relation may be even stronger than reported. Persons who drive after drinking tend to believe that they can consume more drinks and still drive safely than people who do not drive after drinking. 9 Consequently, they may underreport the actual frequency with which they drove after drinking too much or were in a crash because of their drinking. A recent report indicated that after a decade of decline, the percentage of high school seniors who drink and drive has increased the last two years. The study reported here identifies another important reason to step up enforcement of the legal drinking age of and to expand educational programs that delay the onset of drinking. The potential traffic safety benefits of delaying underage drinking may extend well beyond age. Acknowledgements The National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiology Study (NLAES) was sponsored by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). We would like to thank Dr. Bridgett Grant at NIAAA for her help on this project.

Figure : Drove After Drinking Too Much According to Age of Drinking Onset (NLAES) Odds Ratio and Confidence Intervals Controlling for: Ever Past Year Ever, Past year, Never Alcohol Dependent Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, Education, Marital Status, Sm oking, Illicit Drug Use...9..8 Age Started Drinking.8.....9.88.9.8..9 < 8 9 + < 8 9 + 8 Drove After Drinking (Unadjusted %) p <. p <. Figure : In a Motor Vehicle Accident Because of Drinking Too Much According to Age of Drinking Onset (NLAES) Odds Ratio and Confidence Intervals...9 Age Started Drinking Ever..9.9.9.8 < 8 9 +...9 Past Year.8.8.9. Controlling for: Ever, Past year, Never Alcohol Dependent Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicit Education, Marital Status, Smoking, Illicit Drug Use.8. < 8 9 + 9..8.8...... Percent in an Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Accident p <. N.S.

References. Health United States, 99 99 and Injury Chartbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 99. DHHS Publication No PHS 9-.. Traffic Safety Facts, 99. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 998. DOT HS 88 8.. Drinking age laws: an evaluation synthesis of their impact on highway safety. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 98. GAO PEMD 8-.. Traffic Safety Facts: Alcohol 99. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis; 998.. O Malley P, Wagenaar A. Effects of minimum drinking age laws on alcohol use, related behaviors, and traffic crash involvement among American youth. J. of Alcohol Studies. 99; :8 9.. Grant, B. The impact of family history of alcoholism on the relationship between age at onset of alcohol use and DSM-III alcohol dependence. Alcohol Health and Research World. 998; ():.. Massey JT, Parsons VL, Tadros W. Design and estimation for the national health interview survey, 98 99. In: Vital and Health Statistics Report Series (), Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 989. 8. Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User s Manual, Release.. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 99. 9. National Survey of Drinking and Driving Attitudes and Behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 99. DOT HS 88 8.. O Malley PM, Johnston LD. Drinking and driving among high school seniors. American Journal of Public Health. 999; 89():8-8.