University of Groningen Children of bipolar parents Wals, Marjolein IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2004 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Wals, M. (2004). Children of bipolar parents: prevalence of psychopathology and antecedents of mood disorders Groningen: s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 12-11-2018
Prevalence of Psychopathology Chapter 2: Prevalence of psychopathology in children of bipolar parents Marjolein Wals Manon H. J. Hillegers Catrien G. Reichart Johan Ormel Willem A. Nolen Frank C. Verhulst Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2001, 40, 664-671 13
Chapter 2 Abstract Objective: To determine psychopathology in adolescent children of a bipolar parent living in The Netherlands, using multiple sources of information (selfreport, parent, and teacher reports). Methods: Problem behavior in 140 offspring (aged 12-21 years) of 86 bipolar parents was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the Teacher's Report Form (TRF), and the Youth Self-Report (YSR) between 1997 and 1999. All adolescents, bipolar parents and their available spouses were interviewed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). Results: Higher problem scores were found for 8 of the 11 CBCL scales for girls, 4 of the 11 CBCL scales for boys, compared to a Dutch normative sample and 1 YASR scale for girls compared to an American normative sample. Lower problem scores were found on 4 YSR and 4 YASR scales for boys, 1 TRF scale for girls and 1 TRF scale for boys. The prevalence of current DSM-IV diagnoses in the offspring was 29%, and of lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses 44%. Conclusions: The prevalence of problem behavior and DSM-IV diagnoses found in our sample did not support the notion that the level of psychopathology in children aged 12-21 years of bipolar parents is highly elevated. Limitations: This study, similar to prior studies, suffers from lack on information on the representativeness of the sample, and a rather low response rate. Keywords: bipolar, psychopathology, adolescents, K-SADS, CBCL Introduction Several studies have reported on an increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children of parents with bipolar disorder. Table 1 gives the prevalences of children of bipolar parents with a current or lifetime psychiatric disorder for all published studies that included diagnostic assessments resulting in psychiatric diagnoses. All studies used clinical interviews to assess psychopathology, mostly the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS). Whereas the majority of studies included in table 1 reported, in addition to DSM-IV diagnoses, parent or teacher rating scale scores of psychopathology in children of bipolar parents, only four compared these data with those obtained in normative or comparison samples. One study, not listed in table 1, only reported on parent and teacher ratings of problem behavior and not on psychiatric diagnoses (Anderson and Hammen, 1993). To our knowledge, there are no studies that have used adolescents' self-reported problems to assess the level and type of psychopathology. Two studies using rating scales did not report elevated levels of psychopathology in children of bipolar parents (Anderson and Hammen, 1993; Kashani et al., 1985), whereas three other studies using rating scales did find elevated levels of psychopathology in children of bipolar parents (Carlson and Weintraub, 1993; Radke-Yarrow, 1992; Zahn-Waxler et al., 1988). 14
Prevalence of Psychopathology Prevalence rates reported in existing studies varied greatly. However, there are a number of methodological issues that hamper the comparability across studies and the interpretation of findings. First, there is large variation in sample composition. Most studies used selected clinical samples of adults with bipolar disorder that consisted of either inpatients, outpatients or a mix, with varying degrees of severity of the condition, and of bipolar I, or a mix of bipolar I and II patients (see table 1). Also, the comparison samples varied greatly and comprised children of parents from nonrepresentative nonclinical samples of convenience, or of children of parents with no major mental disorder. Second, the diagnostic procedures varied greatly. The level of standardization of the interviews used in the various studies differed as well as the diagnostic criteria used and the number of diagnoses included. Most studies used clinical interviews of parents and children separately and combined the often conflicting information in idiosyncratic ways. The way parent and child information from standardized interviews is combined affects the prevalence considerably (Verhulst et al., 1997a). It is important to use information from multiple informants in order to obtain a comprehensive picture of a child's functioning. Only few studies used teachers in addition to parents and children (e.g. Anderson and Hammen,1993). The use of informants other than parents is relevant because mothers who themselves are depressed may over-report problems in their children (e.g. Fergusson et al., 1993). Third, the comparison samples used in the studies are usually small and highly unrepresentative. Therefore, they do not form an adequate basis for comparing results in the at risk samples. The apparently high prevalences reported in many studies using clinical interviews with children of bipolar parents can only be meaningfully interpreted if we know the population base rates obtained with similar assessment procedures. Purpose of this study The main aims were: 1) to compare parent's, teacher's and self ratings of problems in children of bipolar parents with ratings for children from the general population that were published previously (Achenbach, 1997a,b; Verhulst et al., 1996; 1997b,c); and 2) to determine the current and lifetime prevalence of DSM- IV diagnoses based on interviews with both parents and adolescents with the K- SADS. 15
Chapter 2 Table 1: Prevalences of current and lifetime diagnoses based on psychiatric interviews in studies among bipolar offspring Study Number of children Age in years Interview with child (C) or parent (P) Kuyler et al., 1980 49 6-18 Structured interview based on Steward and Gath, 1978: P Waters & Marchenko- Bouer, 1980 Diagnostic criteria % of cases with current diagnoses % of cases with life-time diagnoses Type of Bipolar disorder in parent Treatment setting of parent no DSM a,b 45% - I + II Outpatients? 50 16-35 SADS-L c : C DSM-III? 50%?? Outpatients LaRoche et al., 1981 17 8-18 CPRS d, CARS e : C -? Inpatients DSM-III 6% -? Outpatients Decina et al., 1983 31 7-14 MHAF f : C DSM-III/RDC 52% - I + II Outpatients Gershon et al., 1985 29 6-17 K-SADS-E: C + P DSM-III 72% - I In- outpatients Kashani et al., 1985 9 7-17 DICA-P, DICA g : C + P DSM-III C: 52%-P: 48% h Klein et al., 1985 37 15-21 SADS-L: C DSM-III/RDC? 43%? I Inpatients LaRoche et al., 1985 39 5-18 CPRS, CARS: C DSM-III 23% -? Outpatients Hammen et al., 1987 12 8-16 K-SADS: C + P DSM-III - 92% I? In- outpatients LaRoche et al., 1987 37 8-25 CPRS, CARS: C DSM-III 24% -? Outpatients Weintraub, 1987 134 >18 SADS, SCI i : C DSM-III 20% -? Inpatients Nurnberger et al., 1988 38 15-25 SADS-L: C DSM-III 74% -?? Zahn-Waxler et al., 1988 7 5-6 CAS j : C DSM-III 86% -?? Grigoroiu-Serbanescu 72 10-17 K-SADS-E: C + P DSM-III 61% - I Inpatients et al., 1989 Hammen et al., 1990 18 8-16 K-SADS: C + P DSM-III 33% 72% I + II In/outpatients Radke-Yarrow et al., 1992 22 8-11 CAS : C DSM-III 56% k - I + II Outpatients Carlson & Weintraub, 1993 125 >18 SADS-L, SCI: C DSM-III 53% -? Inpatients Todd et al., 1996 16 6-17 DICA-R-P, DICA-R DSM-III-R - 44% I + II Outpatients Duffy et al., 1998 36 10-25 K-SADS: C + P DSM-IV - 53% I? Chang et al., 2000 60 6-18 K-SADS: C + P DSM-IV - 55% I + II Outpatients Note: a Diagnostic Statistic Manual; b > 3 symptoms = "diagnosis"; c Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia; d Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale; e Children's Affective Rating Scale; f Mental Health Assessment Form; g Diagnostic Interview Schedule for (parents of) Children and Adolescents; h these rates are for bipolar and unipolar offspring together; i Structured Clinic Interview for DSM-III; j Child Assessment Schedule; k This is the prevalence at follow-up 16
Prevalence of Psychopathology Methods Population and procedure Subjects were enrolled in the study between November 1997-March 1999. A survey was sent to all (n = 1961) members of the Dutch Association for manicdepressives (NSMD) explaining the aims of the study and including questions concerning the illness of the subjects, family composition and age of the offspring. Of the 712 (36%) who returned the survey, 110 reported that they had bipolar disorder as well as one or more children in the age range of 12-21 years. Eventually, 62 out of the eligible 110 parents (56%) agreed to participate with a total of 102 children. In addition, we contacted 9 psychiatric hospitals with an assigned outpatient clinic for patients with bipolar disorder in different regions of the country, representing rural as well as urbanized areas. Psychiatrists of these hospitals were requested to identify all potential participants and to ask them for permission to be contacted by one of us; of the 91 bipolar patients with children aged 12 to 21 years, 58 (64%) agreed to be contacted, and 24 (26%) with a total of 38 children, agreed to participate. A family was included into the study only if all adolescents of the family aged 12 to 21 years agreed to participate. All bipolar parents were outpatients at the moment of recruitment. After a complete description of the study was given, written informed consent from 86 bipolar parents and their spouses, and 140 offspring, was obtained. Finally, only adolescents without a severe physical disease or handicap and with an IQ of at least 70 were included. After initial contact, all consenting adolescents fulfilled these criteria. Instruments Parental characteristics DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I or II disorder were checked by applying the mood disorders section of the International Diagnostic Check List (IDCL, Hiller et al., 1993) in the interview with the bipolar parent and, if available, his/her partner. We compared the IDCL-based diagnoses with the DSM-IV diagnoses made by the treating psychiatrist. No discrepancies were found. Socioeconomic status (SES) was scored on a 9-point scale of parental occupational level with 1 = lowest and 9 = highest. If both parents worked, the highest score was used. The mean SES of the parents in our sample of 4.9 (SD = 2.1) did not differ significantly from the mean of 4.5 (SD = 2.1) from a Dutch general population sample (Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics, 1993) (t = 1.941, p =.06). Child characteristics The K-SADS-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL; Kaufman et al., 1997) is an interviewer oriented diagnostic interview designed to assess current and past DSM-IV symptomatology resulting in diagnoses in children and adolescents, by interviewing the parent(s) and child separately. If parents and child disagreed on the presence of a symptom, greater weight was typically given to parents' reports 17
Chapter 2 of observable behavior and children's reports of subjective experiences (Kaufman et al., 1997). The K-SADS-PL was conducted by three of the authors (MW, MH, and CR), and by five intensively trained interviewers with graduate degrees in psychology. In addition to the K-SADS derived diagnoses (for mood, anxiety, attention deficit, conduct, substance abuse, eating, post traumatic stress, adjustment and tic disorders; enuresis/encopresis), we also screened for DSM-IV pervasive developmental disorders. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991a,b) is a questionnaire to be completed by parents of 4- to 18-year-olds and can be scored on 8 syndrome scales and two broad-band groupings of syndromes: Internalizing (consisting of the Withdrawn, Somatic Complaints, and Anxious/Depressed scales), and Externalizing (consisting of the Delinquent and Aggressive Behavior scales). A total problem score is derived by summing the individual item scores. The Youth Self-Report (YSR; Achenbach, 1991a,d) has the same response format as the CBCL but has to be completed by 11-18-year-olds themselves. It consists of the same scales as the CBCL plus a self destructive/identity problems scale (for boys only). The Teacher's Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 1991a,c) can be completed by teachers of 5-18-year-olds who have known a pupil in a school setting for at least two months. It consists of the same scales as the CBCL. Good reliability and validity of the CBCL, YSR, and TRF have been replicated for the Dutch translation (Verhulst et al., 1996; 1997b,c). The Young Adult Self-Report (YASR) and Young Adult Behavior Checklist (YABCL) (Achenbach, 1997a,b) are upward extensions of the YSR and CBCL for ages 18 years and older. The YASR is filled out by young adults and the YABCL by parents. The YASR and YABCL can be scored on similar syndrome scales as those of the CBCL, except for the Social Problems scale which was replaced by the Intrusive Behavior scale. The syndrome scales can be scored on two broadband groupings of syndromes: Internalizing (consisting of the Anxious/Depressed and Withdrawn scales) and Externalizing (consisting of the Intrusive Behavior, Delinquent Behavior, and Aggressive Behavior scales). CBCL, YSR and TRF scores for bipolar offspring (boys and girls separately) were compared with those for children of a Dutch normative sample. For the YABCL and YASR, comparisons between bipolar offspring and children of an American normative sample were made because no Dutch normative data were available. The percentage of subjects who could be regarded as deviant using cutoffs recommended by Achenbach (1991a,b,c, 1997) were computed for each sex, age group, 12-18, and > 18 years, and for each instrument separately. In this way sex and age differences were taken into account. For all questionnaires, the cutoff was set at the 82nd percentile for Externalizing, Internalizing, and total problems scores, and for the syndrome scales at the 95th percentile. To assess the children's IQs one verbal (Vocabulary) and one Performance (Block Design) subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WISC-R and WAIS), was used. These subtests were chosen because of their high correlations with the full scale score of the verbal and performance Intelligence Quotient (Silverstein, 1972, 1982). 18
Prevalence of Psychopathology Results Demographics The demographic characteristics of the sample are shown in table 2. Our sample did not differ significantly from the Dutch general population with regard to sex distribution and SES. Our sample did differ from the general population in mean IQ, which was higher in the offspring of bipolar parents. Table 2: Demographics n % p Males 72 51 Females 68 49.800 Bipolar fathers 34 40 Bipolar mothers 52 60.060 Bipolar I parents 64 74 Bipolar II parents 22 26 Married 65 76 Divorced 21 24 Mean SD p Age males 16.0 2.72 Age females 16.3 2.72.413 IQ males 115.0 16.04 IQ females 110.7 15.48.111 IQ children of bipolar parents 113 16 IQ general population 100 15.000 SES parents of bipolar offspring 4.8 2.07 SES general population 4.5 2.06.056 19
Chapter 2 Problem behavior: rating scale scores for children of bipolar parents compared with normative samples Table 3 shows the mean problem scores as reported by mothers for adolescents aged < 19 years on the CBCL, and for adolescents aged > 19 years on the YABCL; by the adolescents aged < 19 years on the YSR or aged > 19 years on the YASR; and by the teachers for adolescents aged 11-19 on the TRF. We will report the differences that were significant at the level of p<.05 and p<.01. CBCL/YABCL. Girls of bipolar parents obtained significantly higher scores than girls of the Dutch normative sample on the following CBCL scales: total problems, Internalizing, Externalizing, Somatic Complaints, Anxious/Depressed, Social Problems, Delinquent Behavior and Aggressive Behavior. Boys of bipolar parents obtained significantly higher scores on the total problems, Externalizing, Thought Problems and Aggressive Behavior scales than boys of the normative sample. No YABCL scale showed a significant difference in mean scores for the bipolar offspring versus the normative samples. YSR/YASR. The mean problem scores of the YSR scales as reported by girls < 19 years of bipolar parents yielded no significant differences versus the normative sample. Boys of bipolar parents aged < 19 years scored significantly lower than normative boys on the total problems, Social Problems, Attention Problems and Self Destructive/Identity Problems scales. On the self-report measure for the older children (YASR), girls of bipolar parents scored significantly higher than a normative sample of US girls on Attention Problems. Boys of bipolar parents scored significantly lower on the Externalizing, Withdrawn, Thought Problems and Aggressive Behavior scales than boys in the normative sample. TRF. The mean problems scores reported by teachers yielded two significant differences: girls of bipolar parents scored significantly lower than girls in the normative sample on the Thought Problems scale and boys scored significantly lower than boys in the normative sample on Social Problems. 20
Prevalence of Psychopathology Table 3: Mean Problem Scale Scores for children of Bipolar Parents versus Normative Samples on the CBCL, YABCL, YSR, YASR and TRF by gender Scale total problems Internalizing Externalizing Withdrawn Somatic Complaints Anxious/ Depressed Social Problems/ Intrusive Thought Problems Attention Problems Delinquent Behavior Aggressive Behavior CBCL a (n = 103) girls (n = 48) 27.96-17.97 10.9-6.32 7.94-5.21 3.08-2.10 2.83-1.40 5.54-3.00 1.79-1.11 0.77-.0.45 3.33-2.70 2.06-1.16 5.88-4.04 p Value.006.003.016.061.001.005.027.112.213.023.025 boys (n = 55) 24.76-18.50 7.25-5.36 8.95-6.35 2.73-2.06 1.35-0.90 3.47-2.51 1.49-1.10 0.87-0.38 3.73-3.46 1.95-1.58 7.00-4.77 p Value.012.059.008 0.90.164.054.180.005.587.210.004 YABCL mothers (n = 35) girls (n = 17) 27.12-20.8 7.82-5.3 7.12-6.5 1.24-1.2 1.82-1.9 6.59-4.1 1.76-1.8 0.65-0.5 4.71-2.8 1.29-0.9 4.06-3.9 p Value.343.198.823.933.873.120.964.551.102.540.920 boys (n = 18) 19.72-20.7 4.11-4.8 6.17-7.4 1.00-1.3 1.44-1.3 3.11-3.5 1.56-2.3 0.44-0.4 4.00-3.6 2.06-1.5 2.56-3.5 p Value.847.517.580.299.787.689.228.882.587.527.319 Self Destructive/ Identity Problems YSR (n = 105) girls (n = 49) 35.06-33.89 12.61-10.65 9.82-9.80 3.16-2.64 3.82-2.92 6.00-5.31 2.22-2.33 1.59-1.24 4.22-4.79 3.22-2.99 6.59-6.81 p Value.688.160.984.188.087.340.707.217.131.443.725 boys b (n = 56) 27.34-32.83 6.95-8.35 10.39-11.23 1.95-2.35 2.00-2.07 3.18-4.05 1.71-2.56 0.96-1.16 3.54-4.62 3.20-3.64 7.20-7.59 1.25-1.69 p Value.017.077.329.098.807.060.000.277.004.152.541.032 YASR (n = 35) girls (n = 17) 39.24-38.5 11.0-11.9 7.65-7.5 3.00-2.6 2.71-3.5 8.00-9.3 2.82-2.6 0.35-0.3 3.88-2.4 1.65-1.1 3.18-3.8 p Value.916.629.945.527.263.394.783.803.036.345.506 boys (n = 18) 30.67-37.3 7.33-10.1 6.44-9.1 1.67-2.6 2.89-2.5 5.67-7.5 2.67-3.4 0.11-0.4 3.11-2.9 2.06-2.1 1.72-3.6 p Value.168.079.038.022.626.145.154.001.584.929.001 TRF (n = 79) girls (n = 36) 14.19-15.64 6.19-5.98 2.97-3.58 2.28-2.02 0.61-0.42 3.64-3.68 1.53-1.53 0.11-0.31 4.03-4.98 0.61-0.61 2.36-2.97 p Value.597.873.451.615.327.964.997.001.230.996.341 boys (n = 43) 16.30-19.89 4.95-5.04 4.05-5.76 2.12-2.15 0.53-0.30 2.53-2.69 1.16-1.73 0.23-0.30 6.30-7.57 0.65-0.91 3.40-4.86 p Value.121.915.110.923.255.743.024.541.165.231.113 Note: In the table the left mean score is for the children of bipolar parents and the right score is for the normative sample. CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist; YABCL = Young Adult Behavior Checklist; YSR = Youth Self-Report; YASR = Young Adult Self-Report; TRF = Teacher s Report Form. a In all cases the information was provided by the mother, except for one CBCL which was completed by the father; b Self-destructive/Identity Problem Scores: 1.25-1.69 (p=.032). 21
Chapter 2 DSM-IV diagnoses Table 4 shows the prevalence of current (2 months) and lifetime K-SADS/DSM-IV diagnoses in the adolescents of our sample. Forty-one adolescents (29%) met criteria for at least one current DSM-IV diagnosis at time of the interview. Nineteen adolescents (14%) met criteria for a current mood disorder, including 4 (3%) with a bipolar disorder. Sixty-one adolescents (44%) met criteria for at least one lifetime diagnosis, 38 adolescents (27%) for a mood disorder. The number of adolescents with at least one current DSM-IV disorder differed significantly at a level of p <.05 between adolescents aged < 16 years (n = 67) and adolescents aged > 16 years (n = 73,19% versus 38%; χ 2 = 6.060, df. 1; p =.014). However, the number of adolescents with at least one current mood disorder did not differ significantly between children aged < 16 or > 16 years (10% versus 16%; χ 2 = 1.069; df. 1; p =.301). Table 4: Number of adolescents with current and lifetime DSM-IV Diagnoses (n = 140) Current Diagnoses Lifetime Diagnoses n % n % Anxiety disorder 11 8 15 11 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 6 4 7 5 Disruptive behavior disorder 5 4 8 6 Substance use disorder 8 6 9 6 Other a 10 7 22 16 Mood disorder b 19 14 38 27 Bipolar disorder 4 3 4 3 Major Depressive disorder 3 2 8 6 Dysthymic disorder 6 4 8 6 Cyclothymic disorder 2 1 2 1 Depressive disorder NOS 4 3 15 11 Adjustment disorder with depressed mood 0 0 1 1 Mood disorder NOS 0 0 2 1 Any disorder 41 29 61 44 1 disorder 27 19 23 16 2 disorder 9 6 26 19 3 disorder 4 3 9 6 4 disorder 1 1 3 2 Note: a The "other disorder"-category consisted of enuresis, encopresis, pervasive developmental, tic, and eating disorders; b This is the number of adolescents with at least one mood disorder. Reporting behavior of bipolar parents versus non-bipolar parents Bipolar mothers reported more adolescents in the deviant range of the CBCL total problems scale than non-bipolar fathers of the same children (McNemar, p =.001). Bipolar fathers however, did not report more adolescents in the deviant 22
Prevalence of Psychopathology range of the CBCL total problems scale than non-bipolar mothers of the same children (McNemar, p = 1.000). The YABCL yielded no significant differences between bipolar mothers and non-bipolar fathers or between bipolar fathers and non-bipolar mothers in number of adolescents scoring in the deviant range of the total problems scale (McNemar, p =.500 and 1.000, respectively). Discussion This study used two assessment procedures -questionnaires and interviews- and three sources of information to determine the level and type of psychopathology in adolescent children of bipolar parents. Of the 112 comparisons that we made between bipolar offspring versus normative samples across the 5 rating scales, the various subscales and both genders, 23 comparisons showed a significant difference with 13 differences indicating more problems in bipolar offspring versus normative samples. Mothers reported elevated problem scores for girls aged 11-18 years on 8 of the 11 CBCL scales and on 4 of the 11 scales for boys (including the total problem scores). Problems in girls reflected internalizing problems (Somatic Complaints and Anxious/Depressed) whereas problems in boys reflected externalizing problems (Aggressive Behavior). The adolescents themselves scored significantly lower on 4 scales of the YSR and 4 scales of the YASR. Only the girls aged > 19 years reported more attention problems than their normative age mates. Furthermore, teachers did not report more problem behavior in children of bipolar parents than in children from the normative sample. The higher problem scores reported by mothers for children aged 12-18 years may reflect a reporting bias of bipolar mothers, as found by Fergusson et al. (1993) for depressed mothers, since bipolar mothers reported significantly more adolescents in the deviant range on the CBCL total problems scale than the nonbipolar fathers for the same children. For the YABCL no such reporting bias was found. The prevalence of current K-SADS/DSM-IV diagnoses in the present study was 29%. This rate is considerably lower than the rates of current diagnoses reported in most of the other studies providing prevalences based on parent as well as children reviewed in the chapter 2 (table 1). A problem with the interpretation of results from clinical interviews is that it is often unknown what the population base rates, obtained with the same instruments, for the various disorders are. It remains unclear if the prevalences found in the present sample differ significantly from those in the general population, since no K-SADS/DSM-IV diagnoses are available for the Dutch general population. Whereas the prevalence of current diagnoses in the present study represented diagnoses that were present within the preceding 2 months of the interview, Verhulst et al. (1997a) assessed the DSM-III-R diagnoses that were present within the preceding 6 months. The 2-month prevalence of any current K-SADS/DSM-IV disorder of 29% that we found is slightly lower than the 6-months prevalence of 23
Chapter 2 DSM-III-R diagnoses of 35.5% in the Dutch general population of 13-18-year-olds by Verhulst et al. (1997a), resulting from combining parent and child information on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC; Schaffer et al., 1993). In addition, it is slightly higher than the 22% based on child information only or the 22% based on parent information only with the DISC. In both studies roughly the same disorders were assessed, except for pervasive developmental disorder which we added to the K-SADS in our study and which was diagnosed for 3 subjects. On the basis of our lifetime diagnostic information we could determine the 6 month prevalence, adding one adolescent to the 41 with current diagnoses, raising the prevalence of 6-months DSM-IV diagnoses to 30%. Only the prevalence of mood disorders (14%) in the present study is considerably higher than that found for the Dutch general population (7.2%) in the study of Verhulst et al. (1997a). As was discussed in relation to the CBCL scores, mothers with bipolar disorder who were interviewed with the K-SADS may have overreported problems in their children. Because the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA) is more similar to the K-SADS than to the DISC, the K-SADS being an interviewer based instrument and the DISC a respondent based instrument, we also compared the prevalences in the present study to those of the community study among 9- to 13- year-olds by Costello et al. (1996) who used the CAPA. The 3-month prevalence of any DSM-III-R axis I disorder assessed with the CAPA (based on combined parent and child reports) in the Costello et al. (1996) study was 20.3%. Because we assessed lifetime K-SADS diagnoses in the present study, we were able to compute the 3-month prevalences. The 3-month prevalence of any DSM-IV diagnosis of 31% we found in the present study was somewhat higher than the 20.3% in the Costello et al. (1996) study. However, the children in the Costello et al. (1996) study were considerably younger, with ages ranging from 9 to 13 years, than the children in our sample whose ages ranged from 12 to 21 years. The 3- month prevalence of DSM-IV diagnoses in the children aged 12 to 14 (n = 35) in our sample was 14%, which is considerably lower than the 20.3% found by Costello et al. (1996). However, the small number of children aged 12-14 years makes the prevalence estimate in the present study less reliable. Our main findings are: (1) overall, the rating scale scores in the present sample are not or only slightly, higher than the norm; (2) the prevalence of current and lifetime K-SADS/DSM-IV diagnoses is lower than the prevalences of diagnoses found in many of the earlier studies; (3) the prevalence of current diagnoses in the present study is rather similar to the prevalence found for the Dutch general population which was reported previously in a study using the DISC (Verhulst et al., 1997a); (4) the risk in adolescent children from bipolar parents with respect to affective problems may be slightly elevated, if we consider mother ratings on the CBCL scale Anxious/Depressed and Somatic Complaints in girls, and K-SADS interviews with respect to mood disorders. How do we explain the considerably lower prevalence found in the present study, as compared to the majority of previously reported bipolar offspring studies? 24
Prevalence of Psychopathology First, sample recruitment differed between our own and other studies. In our study more than two thirds of the patients were recruited from the Dutch patients association (NSMD) and only one third came from psychiatric hospitals. It may be possible that patients recruited via a patients association are the relatively good functioning patients as compared to those of the outpatient clinics. Indeed, a higher proportion of children of bipolar parents recruited from outpatient clinics scored within the deviant range on most of the syndrome scales of the CBCL, YABCL, YSR, YASR and TRF than children recruited via the NSMD, but none of the differences were significant at a p <.01 level. With regard to DSM-IV diagnoses in general, adolescents recruited via the outpatient clinics received more current diagnoses than adolescents recruited via the NSMD (40% versus 26% respectively), but again this difference was not significant (χ 2 = 2.614; df. 1; p =.106), while the prevalence of lifetime diagnoses was almost equal (45% versus 43%, χ 2 =.029; df. 1; p =.865). Regarding DSM-IV mood disorders, adolescents recruited via outpatient clinics did not show significantly (p <.01) more current diagnoses than adolescents recruited via the NSMD (24% versus 10%, χ 2 = 4.547; df. 1; p =.033), nor did they show significantly more lifetime mood diagnoses than adolescents recruited via the NSMD (26% versus 28%, χ 2 =.018; df. = 1; p =.893). There were also no significant differences between adolescents recruited from the outpatient clinics and adolescents recruited from the NSMD in SES (t = -.480; p =.632), IQ (t = -1.635; p =.104), age (t = -.611; p =.542) and divorce rate; (χ 2 =.081; df. 1; p =.776). Adolescents in this study had a higher IQ than found for the Dutch general population. However, the SES of the parents in our sample did not differ from the general population. Also, comparing adolescents with and without a psychiatric diagnosis on mean SES and IQ in the present study did not yield significant differences. In many of the previous studies IQ and SES in the bipolar offspring have not been reported. In sum, the only indication that this sample is a different functioning sample than average is the higher IQ, although a higher IQ does not guarantee a better functioning. Limitations A limitation of this study, shared with other prevalence studies of psychopathology in offspring of bipolar parents, is the lack of information on the representativeness of the sample. Our sample may be highly selected since only 36% among the members of the NSMD returned the survey and only 56% of the eligible agreed to participate. Among the outpatient sample, only 26% of the eligible agreed to participate. It could be that the more motivated parents wanted to participate or that the most impaired parents and/or adolescents refused to participate. Including only families in which all adolescents within a family in the age range of 12-21 years were willing to participate could have increased selection bias, since youth with disorders would be more likely to refuse. In addition, the outpatient nature of our sample may have biased the sample towards less severe parental 25
Chapter 2 pathology than if the sample had contained children of parents who were inpatients. Furthermore, whereas the comparability of the scores for children of bipolar parents on the CBCL, YSR and TRF with Dutch normative data is a strong element of the present study, no normative data for DSM-IV diagnoses were available. It should also be noted that the CBCL, TRF, and YSR, like any assessment procedure, as single measures, are not intended to replace the full assessment of a child's functioning including clinical interviews. In the absence of a comparison group, the K-SADS interviewers were not blind to the nature of the sample and the research question. Proper comparison groups would be a representative sample of the general population and children of parents with other psychiatric disorders. Clinical implications and future directions Our study casts doubt on the previously established conclusion that clinicians treating bipolar patients with adolescent offspring in the age range of our study (12-21 years) should be aware of a greatly increased risk for psychopathology in general in these children as we did not convincingly find such a highly elevated risk. However, given the overrepresentation of mood disorders among those adolescents in our sample who have a disorder, it may be concluded that once a youth with a bipolar parent comes to the attention of a clinician, he or she is more likely to have a mood disorder. It remains difficult to estimate the magnitude of the risk for children of bipolar parents to develop psychopathology because there is a lack of studies that generated prevalence data based on information from multiple informants, using both rating scales and interviews in representative samples of children from bipolar parents, with population norms available for these assessment instruments. Future research will aim at determining the effects of a number of family, obstetric, parental, and child factors on the type and level of psychopathology in the offspring. Presented in part at the Satellite symposium on Bipolar Disorder in Children and Adolescents of the 2nd European Stanley Foundation Conference on Bipolar Disorder, September 20, 2000. 26