Guam Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

Similar documents
Guam Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

The Guam EHDI Story. University of Guam Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (Guam CEDDERS)

GUAM. Newborn Hearing At-A-Glance. Guam EHDI Progress Report. Håfa Ådai! January - December 2012

Trends across the country. Indiana Early Hearing Detection 4/13/2015

Kansas Successful Strategies in Reducing Loss to Follow-Up/Loss to Documentation

Lessons Learned Through a Recent Connecticut EHDI Program - Diagnostic Audiology Center Collaboration: One Small Change at a Time

5. Hospitals will provide the family with a copy of the Michigans Community Program: Information for Parents (MDCH /01). Copies can be ordered,

MINNESOTA EARLY HEARING DETECTION AND INTERVENTION (EHDI) PROGRAM. EHDI Goals, Indicators and Benchmarks

Minnesota Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Annual Report for 2012 Data

Iowa EHDI A Work in Progress. Coordinating Council for Hearing Services November 24, 2008

Indiana Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI)

GUIDE TO THE ECHO INITIATIVE HEARING SCREENING & DIAGNOSTIC LOG

Factors Associated with Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-up

JFK-HCP Webinar - Partnering to Support Children with Hearing Loss - 2/27/14 1

Performance Narrative

INPATIENT SCREENING PROTOCOL

GUIDE TO THE ECHO INITIATIVE HEARING SCREENING & DIAGNOSTIC LOG

Global Screening of Hearing in Newborns. Update from Portugal

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI): The Role of the Medical Home

About North Carolina Data. Population 9,382,609 Live Births = 128,180 Children Identified with Hearing Loss = 201

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

Reduce refused screening by identifying facilities who have families who refuse 4/14 12/14 PD,CC, FOS, QIT, EPI,OS, LTFS

Dr Claudine Störbeck and Selvarani Moodley (MA Audiology) The University of the Witwatersrand The Centre for Deaf Studies

Risk Factors for Late-Onset Hearing Loss in Children

RESULTS REPORTING MANUAL. Hospital Births Newborn Screening Program June 2016

Newborn Hearing Screening: Success and Challenges

Appendix C NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROJECT

Improving Loss to Follow-up Rates Diagnostic Center Guidelines for 2011

Reducing Lost to Follow Up Percentages In EHDI Programs: The Role of Audiology

3. How does your state collect these results? (Check all that apply.) collecting this information.

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Tracking Research and Integration with Other Newborn Screening Programs

Progress in Standardization of Reporting and Analysis of Data from Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Programs

Data Management for EHDI: Helpful Friend, Not Dreaded Foe

Reducing Loss to Follow-up after Failure to Pass Newborn Hearing Screening. Table of Contents

State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Permanent Administrative Regulations

MNSCREEN TRAINING MANUAL Hospital Births Newborn Screening Program October 2015

I. Project Identifier Information

Hearing loss is the most frequently occurring congenital

Newborn Hearing Screening Protocol (CG570)

NEWBORN SCREENING PRENATAL CURRICULUM

NCC Pediatrics Continuity Clinic Curriculum: Medical Home Module 2 Well Visits

Instructions. 1. About how many babies are born or admitted to this hospital each year?

Update from Newborn Screening Unit. Moira McLeod

Attachment 1. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Work Plan Project Period: 04/01/ /31/2017

Attachment E PIP Validation Tools

Project Narrative MD EHDI Online Data Management

SARAH 2017 Continuum of Care Renewal Application IRT Scoring Sheet

Designing a complex needs service

California Newborn Hearing Screening Program: Tracking Our Babies

Collaboration Between WIC and EHDI to Improve Follow-Up of Newborn Hearing Screening in Greater Cincinnati

AR UNHS (2014) H61MC Introduction

Port of Portland Hillsboro Airport Master Plan Update Planning Advisory Committee Charter

BC Early Hearing Program

Newborn Screening Free health checks for your baby. Newborn. Hearing Screening. Your Baby s Hearing Screen

Map of Medicine National Library for Health

FFT and Patient Insight for Improvement. Marie Allen Head of Service User and Carer Experience

Colorado EHDI Work Plan

NEWBORN SCREENING in Massachusetts: Answers for you and your baby

1 APRIL 2007 TO 31 MARCH

Infant Hearing Program Service Levels and Funding in Toronto

PROJECT NARRATIVE. Figure 1: Number of children who did not pass their hearing screen and subsequent results for 2011.

Mrs Kate Johnston, Mr Phil Lindsey, Mrs Charlotte Wilson Dr Marieke Emonts, Mrs Ailsa Pickering. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Simplifying Reporting of Communication Development Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss

The Fiscal Impact of Lost to Documentation of Newborn Hearing Screening in Oklahoma s County Health Departments

Historical Perspective. JCIH 1973 Position Statement. JCIH Goals. JCIH 1982 Position Statement

How Do We Support Families in 2010?

Using Virtual Technology to Fully Implement EHDDI (Early Hearing Detection, Diagnosis and Intervention) in Rural Settings

The Friends and Family Test (FFT) score is calculated as outlined in the NHS England guidance issued in Oct-14. The calculation is as follows:

Ensuring high quality ABR in babies

Jackson Roush, PhD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

CHHA-NL POSITION PAPER. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program (UNHSP) in Newfoundland and Labrador

University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service Activity Report 2015/16

the time is now: wisconsin s journey towards improving early intervention services

Surveying Pennsylvania s Families of Young Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

OAE Hearing Screening and Follow-up Training Workshop Agenda

The findings and conclusions in this presentation

Hear Now! ND EHDI Announces the release of North Dakota s Early Intervention Module. Inside this issue:

COACHingto improve NHS Outcomes: Coalition of Ohio Audiologists and Childrens Hospitals

What the Alice Cogswell Act Will Do Prepared by Barbara Raimondo March 2013

Maine s Collaborative Early Intervention Model You can do it too!

Statewide Infant Screening - Hearing (SWISH) Elisabeth Murphy Lara Harvey Carlie Naylor NSW Health Department

Reducing Loss to Follow-Up After Failure to Pass Newborn Hearing Screening New Hampshire Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program

Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening in The Netherlands. Bert van Zanten Audiological Center of the University Medical Center Utrecht

Michael Macione, AuD; & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD

Disclosures. Objectives 2/29/2016. Bradley Golner M.D. FAAP. AzEHDI chapter champion AAP EHDI leadership team

The Tennessee EHDI Information System

Impact of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program on the Detection of Hearing Loss at Birth Michigan,

Joint Standing Committee on the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) The Provision of Hearing Services under the NDIS

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright (c) 2011 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

Congenital CMV (ccmv) Initiatives Across the United States: A Panel Discussion

NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING

The National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Landscape:

HIV Care & Treatment STATE OF OREGON

Making Connections: Early Detection Hearing and Intervention through the Medical Home Model Podcast Series

Evidence-Based Practice Fidelity Site Visit Tools

IHN-CCO DST Final Report and Evaluation

PROPOSED WORK PROGRAMME FOR THE CLEARING-HOUSE MECHANISM IN SUPPORT OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary

EHDI: An Amazing Journey

INTRODUCTION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

GSI AUDIOscreener OAE AND ABR HEARING SCREENING

Transcription:

Guam Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Project Riko hi: Reducing Loss to Follow-Up after Failure to Pass Newborn Hearing Screening and at All Levels of the Hearing Continuum 4 th Quarterly Meeting, March 9, 2016

Welcome and Thank You for Coming

Agenda Sign In & Welcoming Call Meeting to Order Introduction of Members Approval of Minutes Progress update to the Aims and Sub aims Open Discussion Announcements and Next Meeting

Outcomes After this meeting, Advisory members will provide input and recommendations to the following: Progress updates to the Aims and Sub Aims; Provide feedback and recommendations

AIM 1 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi with participating birth site screeners will utilize specifically targeted and measurable interventions that are culturally and linguistically competent such as quality improvement methodologies in reducing the number of infants LTF/D who have not passed a newborn hearing screening examination prior to discharge from a birthing site to 1% or less

AIM 1 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi will reduce the number of infants LTF/D at initial screening to 1% or less. (about 2 3 per month)

GMHA Initial Screening Results 250 200 150 99% 100% 100% 100 50 0 13% Oct Nov Dec Total Births 225 207 206 Total Screened 222 207 206 Total FIS 28 14 18 7% 9%

SMBC Initial Screening Results 40 35 30 25 20 15 93% 94% 91% 10 5 0 0% 7% 9% Oct Nov Dec Total Births 30 31 35 Total Screened 28 29 32 Total FIS 0 2 3

GRMC Initial Screening Results 14 12 10 8 100% 100% 6 4 2 0% 0 Oct Nov Dec Total Births 0 10 12 Total Screened 0 10 12 Total FIS 0 0 1 8%

Initial Screening Totals 300 250 200 150 98% 99% 99% 100 50 11% 6% 0 Oct Nov Dec Total Births 255 248 253 Total Screened 249 247 250 Total FIS 28 14 21 8%

Sub AIMs 1. Increase accuracy of family contact information by 10%. 2. Decrease the number of refer of OAE by 10%.

Infants Referred by OAE and AABR Screener 250 200 150 100 50 22% 13% 17% 7% 9% 8% 0 Oct Nov Dec Total Screened 223 208 212 Total Referred by OAE 48 36 19 Total Referred by AABR Screener 28 14 18

Discussion and Input

AIM 2 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi with participating birth site screeners and early intervention staff will utilize specifically targeted and measurable interventions that are culturally and linguistically competent such as quality improvement methodologies in reducing the number of infants LTF/D currently at 6% who did not pass the outpatient hearing screening by one month of age to 4% or less.

AIM 2 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi will reduce the number of infants LTF/D currently at outpatient rescreen to 4% or less. (about 1 2 per month)

Outpatient Rescreen Totals (Infants referred from GMH and GRMC and screened by GEIS) 30 25 20 15 10 5 7% 0% 0% 0 Oct Nov Dec Total Needing Rescreen 28 14 19 Total Rescreened 25 13 15 Total Relocating 3 0 0 Total Refuse Services 0 0 0 Total Pending 0 0 4 Total Lost to Follow Up 0 1 0

Outpatient Rescreen Totals (SMBC) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0% 0 Oct Nov Dec Total Needing Rescreen 0 2 3 Total Rescreened 2 3 Total Relocating 0 0 Total Refuse Services 0 0 Total Lost to Follow Up 0 0 0%

Sub AIMs 1. By April 2016, increase the number of children by 5% who receive the outpatient rescreens by 1 month. 2. By April 2016, increase the accuracy of family contact information by 5%

Outpatient Rescreen 30 25 20 15 79% 83% 10 72% 5 Total Needing Outpatient Rescreen Oct Nov Dec 28 14 23 Total Rescreened 25 13 19 Total Rescreened by 1 Month of Age 0 22 10 19

AIM 3 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi with early intervention staff will continue to utilize specifically targeted and measurable interventions that are culturally and linguistically competent such as quality improvement methodologies in reducing the number of infants LTF/D for diagnostic audiological evaluation by 3 months of age from the aggregate 16% from 2011 to 2014 to 8% or less

AIM 3 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi will reduce the number of infants LTF/D for DAE to 8% or less. (about 1 per month)

Total Infants Referred for DAE (Oct Dec 2015) 6 5 4 3 80% 2 1 0 Total Infants Referred for DAE Total Infants Receiving DAE Total Infants Receiving DAE by 3 months Total with Hearing Loss Total Relocating Total Refusing Services Total Pending DAE Total LFU Series1 5 1 1 1 0 0 4 0 0%

AIM 5 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi with early intervention staff will continue to identify and utilize specifically targeted interventions such as CLC QI methodologies to ensure Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) are in place by six months of age for 100% of infant s identified with persistent and permanent hearing loss

AIM 5 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi will ensure Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) are in place by six months of age all infant s identified with hearing loss

Percent of Infants with HL receiving IFSP prior to 6 Months of Age 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0% 0% 0 Total with IFSP prior to 6 Total with Hearing Loss Total with IFSP months Series1 1 0 0

Sub AIMs 1. By December 2015, increase by 100% the monitoring services provided by GEIS to all infants pending a DAE. 2. By October 30, 2015, complete DAEs for 80% of all infants needing a DAE that were born from November 2014 April 2015.

DAE Data Total Total Children Born Nov 2014 Apr 2015 pending a DAE 10 Total Receiving a DAE 9 Note: 1 Family Refused services

AIM 4 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi, with the medical home and early intervention staff, will continue to utilize specifically targeted and measurable interventions that are culturally and linguistically competent in reducing the number of infants LTF/D who have high risk factors for late onset and progressive hearing loss who fail to return for rescreen by six months of age from the current level of 20% to 10% or less

AIM 4 By March 31, 2017, Project Rikohi will reduce the number of infants LTF/D at the high risk rescreen level to 10% or less. (about 1 2 per month)

High Risk Rescreen 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0% 0% 0% Oct Nov Dec Total Needing Rescreen 9 9 6 Total Rescreened 5 7 3 Total Deceased 0 0 0 Total Relocating 0 0 2 Total Refuse Services 0 1 0 Total Pending 4 1 1 Total Lost to Follow Up 0 0 0

Sub AIMs 1. By April 2016, reduce number of no shows for high risk re screening appointments by 5%.

High Risk Rescreen QI Team Data Total Needing High Risk Rescreen Oct Nov Dec 9 9 6 Total Rescreened 4 7 3 Average Age at High Risk Rescreen 6.85 5.73 5.45

Training and Activities EVENT (December 2015 March 2016) RESULTS Prenatal classes GMH & SM Central DPHSS: 12/11/15(5);12/25/15(0, holiday); 01/08/16(9); 01/22/16(13); 02/12/16(10); 02/26/16(10) GMHA: 12/7/15(9); 01/04/16(11); 02/01/16(7) Outreach activities Hearing Screening Total: 74 participants 2/13: Head Start Fitness Fair 2/20: Check Me Out Fair 2/27: Dental Fair 3/4: GSAT Conference 3/19: GSAT Fair GEIS Hearing Screening Clinics 12/2 14, 12/22 15, 1/27 32, 2/25 25 3/30

Media Development

Media Development

Media Development

Media Development

Media Development Initial Screening The Guam EHDI project has maintained a 99% initial hearing screening rate at Guam Memorial Hospital Authority and Sagua Managu Birthing Facility. Percent Lost to Follow Up (LFU) Outpatient Rescreen High Risk Rescreen The Lost to Follow Up (LFU) rate for outpatient rescreens increased to 30% in 2012, and decreased to 27% in 2013. However, the rate decreased to 8% in 2014, which exceeded the established Guam EHDI benchmark. The Lost to Follow Up (LFU) rate for High Risk Rescreens increased to 33%in 2012, and 35% in 2013. In 2014, the Guam EHDI benchmark was met with 20% LFU for High Risk Rescreens. Diagnostic Audiological Evaluation (DAE)

Survey Results 1. Was the information provided helpful? Yes (9) or No ( 0 ) 2. Was the information Easy to understand? Yes (7) Yes Depending on target audience; very wordy for parents. No ( 0 ) May not be too parent friendly 3. Are there any changes to the format you would recommend? Yes or No (5) a. If yes, what would you recommend? Smaller Brochure Reduce the graphs; add a section that explains why we re pushing for the 1 3 6 time lines 4. Do you have any other suggestions? None at the moment None Concise/Shorter paragraphs or bullets Easier to read b/c it s wordy. Otherwise None. (1) A statement that F/U Screening is FREE (2) Add a picture(s) of infants actually being screened (3) Add a brief sections assuring parents that their babies aren t harmed by the process of hearing screening (4) Clarify what the follow up terms mean, so reader follows e.g., Initial Screening hearing screening at birth site before discharge, Outpatient Screening for follow up screening of the initial screening, High Risk Screening Child has history of risk factor at birth, but passed the initial screening 5. Would you prefer to have a printed or hard copy of the document or an electronic version? Hard Copy (5) or Electronic version (5) Thank you for taking the time in completing this form. Comments: Very Nice! Congrats for the Annual Report, well done, slick and glossy.

Closing Activities Open Discussion Announcements: Next Meeting: Wednesday, June 8, 2016