Texas Chronic Disease Burden Report. April Publication #E

Similar documents
The Burden Report: Cardiovascular Disease & Stroke in Texas

HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION PROGRAM OREGON STATE OF THE HEART AND STROKE REPORT 2001 PREPARED BY.

A Closer Look at Leading Causes of Death in Guilford County

Healthy Montgomery Obesity Work Group Montgomery County Obesity Profile July 19, 2012

Colorado Health Disparities Profiles

Colorado Health Disparities Profiles

Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans

BREAST CANCER IN TARRANT COUNTY: Screening, Incidence, Mortality, and Stage at Diagnosis

SECTION 2. Health Status, Health Risks, and Use of Health Services

What is the Impact of Cancer on African Americans in Indiana? Average number of cases per year. Rate per 100,000. Rate per 100,000 people*

The Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in North Carolina June 2009 Update

CANCER FACTS & FIGURES For African Americans

Tennessee Department of Health in collaboration with Tennessee State University and University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Community Health Needs Assessment for UI Health Hospital & Clinics

Baseline Health Data Report: Cambria and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania

Cancer Prevention: the gap between what we know and what we do

Public Health. W a k e C o u n t y H u m a n S e r v i c e s P u b l i c H e a l t h Q u a r t e r l y R e p o r t. Prevent. Promote.

Burden of Cancer in California

Leading causes of death among Minneapolis residents,

Worcester County Report Card 2012

Heart Disease and Stroke in New Mexico. Facts and Figures: At-A-Glance

STATISTICAL NEWS. Breast Cancer Cases Up; Mortality Rates Down. Multiple Race Reporting In 2000 Census Noted

County of Orange Health Care Agency. Orange County Mortality Data, 2002

Health of the City & Community Health Improvement Planning. Raynard Washington, PhD, MPH Chief Epidemiologist

Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer

Missouri Department of Health Division of Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

Colorado s Progress toward Year 2000 Objectives

Jackson County Community Health Assessment

Table E1. Standardized Mortality Ratios for Total and Specific Causes of Death Parameter Radiologists Psychiatrists No. of Deaths

The Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in North Carolina. Justus-Warren Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Task Force April 11, 2018

New Mexico Department of Health. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Report Card

Collaborations to Reduce Health Disparities and Improve Wellness

Behavioral Risk Factors in Adults

Cancer Health Disparities in Tarrant County

Reduce Costs, Prevent Disease, Improve Employee Health

Health Concern. Obesity Guilford County Department of Public Health Community Health Assessment

David V. McQueen. BRFSS Surveillance General Atlanta - Rome 2006

HealtheCNY Indicator List by Data Source

Annual Tobacco Report 2000

JUSTUS WARREN TASK FORCE MEETING DECEMBER 05, 2012

FACT SHEET % 15.0% Percent 10.0%

Community Health Needs Assessment

Cancer Disparities in Arkansas: An Uneven Distribution. Prepared by: Martha M. Phillips, PhD, MPH, MBA. For the Arkansas Cancer Coalition

Wisconsin Heart Disease and Stroke Surveillance Summary Update

Epidemiology of Cancer

*

Cancer in Ontario. 1 in 2. Ontarians will develop cancer in their lifetime. 1 in 4. Ontarians will die from cancer

Orange County Mortality Data, 1999

Prepared by Southern Illinois University School of Medicine s Center for Clinical Research And Office of Community Health and Service

Obesity in Clark County November 3, 2003 Jeanne Palmer, Health Education Manager, CCHD Rayleen Earney, Chronic Disease Health Educator, CCHD

2018 Texas Cancer Registry Annual Report

Community Health Needs Assessment Centra Southside Medical Center

CHRONIC DISEASE PREVALENCE AMONG ADULTS IN OHIO

Health Promotion, Screening, & Early Detection

County of Orange Health Care Agency. Orange County Mortality Data 2000

Cardiovascular Disease in Tennessee. Audrey M Bauer, DVM, MPH Surveillance, Epidemiology and Evaluation Tennessee Department of Health

Cancer in Rural Illinois, Incidence, Mortality, Staging, and Access to Care. April 2014

Cancer Statistics, 2010 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Jiaquan Xu and Elizabeth Ward. DOI: /caac.20073

Community Health Assessment. May 21, 2014

Cambridge Health Indicators 2015

Epidemiology of Cancer 8/31/17

Health Risk Behaviors in the State of Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. 19th Annual Report

LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH, EL DORADO,

Chronic Disease Challenges and Solutions

Fort Ha milton Hospital. Community Benefit Plan & Implementation Strategy

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring Survival Questions and Answers

Moving Forward in 2010 Health Status by Race and Ethnicity

Northampton County. State of the County Health Report (SOTCH)

Suicides increased in 2014

Almost 1 in 10 adults have been diagnosed with diabetes. Alabama is ranked fifth in prevalence of diabetes in the United States and its territories.

Public Health. In 2006, 23% of births were to mothers between the ages of 15 and 19. This is a decline from 25% in 2001.

Progress Tracker. Photo -

NEZ PERCE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

KOOTENAI COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

BOUNDARY COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Santa Clara County Highlights

Table A: Leading Causes of Death* by Age Group North Carolina Residents, 2016

Community Health Assessment Ontario County Chronic Diseases

Leading Causes of Death, Tarrant County, 2008

Tuscarawas County Health Department

Health Issues Specific to Alaska Natives. Jennifer Johnson, MPH, RD, LD, and Diana Redwood, MS, MPH

ADAMS COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Cancer Statistics, 2009 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Yongping Hao, Jiaquan Xu and Michael J. Thun. DOI: /caac.

BONNER COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Overview of Health Disparities in Arkansas

Leading Causes of Death, Tarrant County, 2009

Leading Causes of Death, Tarrant County, 2007

Cancer Statistics, 2007 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Taylor Murray, Jiaquan Xu and Michael J. Thun

Cancer A Superficial Introduction

PHACS County Profile Report for Searcy County. Presented by: Arkansas Center for Health Disparities and Arkansas Prevention Research Center

Looking Toward State Health Assessment.

Bioengineering and World Health. Lecture Twelve

Common Questions about Cancer

2016 PRC Community Health Needs Assessment

The Health of North Carolinians: A Profile

Culture of Health: What Is it?

Region VI. Health Initiative Overview

Potentially preventable cancers among Alaska Native people

Sherri Homan, RN, PhD Public Health Epidemiologist March 2009 Update

2017 Community Health Needs Assessment Report

Transcription:

Texas Chronic Disease Burden Report April 2010 Publication #E81-11194

Direction and Support Lauri Kalanges, MD, MPH Medical Director Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Section, Texas Department of State Health Services Preparation and Development Weihua Li, MD, MPH Epidemiologist Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Program, Texas Department of State Health Services Sarah Kirk, MPH Epidemiologist Texas Asthma Control Program, Texas Department of State Health Services Blaise Mathabela, MS Epidemiologist Diabetes Prevention and Control Program, Texas Department of State Health Services The authors would like to give special thanks to the following individuals for their technical support: Michelle Cook, MPH Rebecca Wood, MS Anna Vincent Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Center for Health Statistics, Texas Department of State Health Services Jennifer Haussler, MS Youth Risk Behavior Survey Center for Health Statistics, Texas Department of State Health Services Joseph Wallace Data Management Team Center for Health Statistics, Texas Department of State Health Services Sylvia Cook, MS Texas Health Care Information Collection Center for Health Statistics, Texas Department of State Health Services

Table of Contents Introduction...1 Data Sources...3 Death...5 Leading Causes of Death...6 Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke...10 Diabetes...16 Lung Cancer...18 Female Breast Cancer...20 Cervical Cancer...22 Colorectal Cancer...24 Prostate Cancer...26 Asthma...28 Arthritis...29 Prevalence...30 High Blood Pressure...31 High Blood Cholesterol...34 Diabetes...37 Smoking...40 Overweight and Obesity...44 Asthma...54 Arthritis...58 Hospitalization...61 Hospital Discharges...62 Average Hospital Charge per Day...64 Total Hospital Charges...67 Payment Source...70 References...79

Introduction 1

diseases are a major cause of disability and death in Texas as well as in the United States and the world. In fact, heart disease, cancer, and stroke account for greater than 50 percent of all deaths per year in Texas. Overall, all the chronic diseases cause 60-70 percent of the deaths in Texas, nationally, and globally. IntroductionChronic 1,2 Modifiable health risk behaviors (lack of physical activity, poor nutrition, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol consumption) are largely responsible for the illness, suffering, and premature death related to chronic diseases. The World Health Organization has estimated that if the major risk factors for chronic disease were eliminated, at least 80 percent of all heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes would be prevented, and more than 40 percent of cancer cases would be prevented. Chronic diseases are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as those diseases that are prolonged, do not resolve spontaneously, and for which a complete cure is rarely achieved. 3 The Texas Department of State Health Services monitors diseases that fit this broad definition of chronic diseases; are preventable; and pose a significant burden in deaths, disabilities, and costs. Health disparities are differences in the prevalence, deaths, burden of diseases and other adverse health conditions or outcomes that exist among specific population groups in the United States. Health disparities can affect population groups based on gender, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geography, sexual orientation, disability or special health care needs. Chronic disease surveillance systems collect specific data to gain better understanding of how social, economic, and other factors can impact health. This report was prepared by the Texas Department of State Health Services Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Section to monitor outcomes for certain chronic disease conditions and associated behavioral risk factors in Texas. The content of this report provides information on deaths, prevalence, trends over time, hospitalizations, and cost. The chronic diseases included in this report are ischemic heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, female breast cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, asthma, arthritis, and diabetes mellitus. This report updates the previous Chronic Disease in Texas: A Surveillance Report of Disease Indicators published in 2008. 2

Data Sources Death Data The death tabulations provided in this report are for Texas residents and are obtained from the Data Management Team, Center for Health Statistics (CHS). There were two significant changes that occurred related to death data starting in 1999. The coding system used for establishing cause of death was changed from the 9th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) to the 10th Revision (ICD-10). All causes listed on a death certificate are categorized and coded according to this guide. An underlying cause of death is then determined through the use of a computer algorithm, Automated Classification of Medical Entities (ACME), developed by the National Center for Health Statistics. The second significant change was the use of the 2000 U.S. population as the standard for age adjustment, which replaces the 1940 U.S. standard population. ICD-10 codes used in this report for death data: Major cardiovascular disease: I00-I99 Ischemic heart disease: I200-I25 Stroke: I60-I69 Congestive heart failure: I50 Hypertension: I10-I15 Diabetes: E10-E14 Lung Cancer: C34 Cervical Cancer: C53 Female Breast Cancer: C50 Colorectal Cancer: C18-C21 Prostate Cancer: C61 Arthritis: M00-M25 Asthma: J45 For more information visit http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/vs/default.shtm. Introduction Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Behavioral risk factors play a prominent role in causing chronic disease, therefore, finding ways to help people adopt healthier behaviors may be the most promising point of prevention and intervention. Surveillance of behavioral risk factors can provide the basis for both developing and evaluating programs designed to reduce the prevalence of unhealthy behaviors. Data on behavioral risk factors are necessary for formulating prevention and intervention strategies, justifying resources to support those strategies, and proposing new policies or legislation. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is an ongoing telephone survey of adult Texans aged 18 and older using a standard protocol and standard interviewing methods. For more information visit http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/chs/brfss/. Youth Risk Behavior Survey The Texas Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) provides a wealth of data for state and local health and education officials to a) implement or modify programs to address the behaviors of young people; b) create awareness of the extent of risk behaviors among young people; c) promote state-level changes that support specific health education curricula and coordinated school health programs; and d) provide evidence-based data to support the need for health education. The YRBS was designed to focus the nation on behaviors among youth related to the leading causes of death and disability among both youth and adults and to assess how these risk behaviors change over time. 3

Introduction The survey is administered to a selection of public high school students in Texas. The results are representative of all students in grades 9-12. For more information visit http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/chs/yrbs/default.shtm. Hospital Discharge Data Hospital discharge data are a rich resource of information about the patterns of care, public health burden, and the costs associated with chronic disease disability. The Texas Health Care Information Collection (THCIC) is responsible for collecting hospital discharge data from all state licensed hospitals except those that are statutorily exempt from the reporting requirement. All reporting hospitals are required to submit discharged inpatient claims data on a quarterly basis, using the uniform bill (UB-92) format. The coding system used for hospitalizations is the ICD-9. All hospital discharges are categorized and coded according to this guide. ICD-9 codes used in this report for hospital discharge data: Ischemic heart disease: 410-414 Hemorrhagic stroke: 430-432 Ischemic stroke: 436-438, 433, and 434 Congestive heart failure: 428 Hypertension: 401-405 Diabetes: 250 All cancer: 140-209 Lung cancer: 162 Female cervical cancer: 180 Female breast cancer: 174 Colorectal cancer: 153, 154 Prostate cancer: 185 Arthritis: 710-719 Osteoarthritis: 715 Asthma: 493 Alzheimer s: 331 Primary payment source categories include Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, self-pay, and other. Self-pay includes charity. Other includes Title V, worker s compensation, other federal program, other non-federal program, and veteran administration plan. For more information visit http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/thcic/default.shtm. Statistical Significance A confidence interval is a computed interval of values that, with a given probability, is said to contain the true value of the population parameter. 95% CIs are used in this report to determine statistical significance. The interpretation of the 95% means there is a 95% chance that the true value of the estimate lies within the range of the interval. 4

Death 5

Leading Causes of Death Because of the changing nature of illness and death, Americans are no longer dying from the same diseases as they did in previous generations. In 1900, pneumonia and influenza, tuberculosis and gastritis, enteritis and colitis were the three leading causes of death, accounting for nearly one-third of all deaths. As sanitation, nutrition, and living conditions improved and medical technology advanced, deaths from infectious diseases declined steadily and children and young adults survived longer. As a result, deaths from chronic conditions have increased. Today, heart disease, cancer, and stroke are the three leading causes of death. Figure 1. Leading Causes of Death, Texas, 2006 Diseases of heart 38,487 Death Malignant neoplasms Cerebrovascular diseases 9,332 34,776 Accidents 9,006 Cause of death Chronic lower respiratory disease Diabetes mellitus Alzheimer's disease 5,180 4,880 7,599 Influenza and pneumonia 3,325 Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis 2,967 Septicemia 2,649 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 Number of deaths A total of 156,525 Texas residents died in 2006. Of those, 118,201 died from the above leading causes. The leading cause of death, diseases of the heart, accounted for 24.6 percent of all deaths, while the second most common cause of death, malignant neoplasms, accounted for 22.2 percent. Cerebrovascular diseases, accidents, and chronic lower respiratory diseases ranked third, fourth, and fifth respectively. Together, the five leading causes of death represented 63.4 percent of all deaths in 2006. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 6

Leading Causes of Death Figure 2. Leading Causes of Death Among Whites, Texas, 2006 Diseases of heart 27,909 Malignant neoplasms 24,962 Chronic lower respiratory disease 6,538 Cerebrovascular diseases 6,478 Cause of death Accidents Alzheimer's disease Diabetes mellitus 5,868 4,059 2,747 Death Influenza and pneumonia 2,449 Intentional self harm 1,795 Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis 1,719 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Number of deaths A total of 109,394 white Texas residents died in 2006. Of those, 84,524 died from the above leading causes. The leading cause of death, diseases of the heart, was responsible for 25.5 percent of all white deaths while malignant neoplasms, the second most common cause of death, accounted for 22.8 percent. Chronic lower respiratory disease ranked third and accounted for 6.0 percent of all deaths among white residents in Texas. Cerebrovascular diseases ranked fourth and accounted for 5.9 percent of all deaths among whites. The top five leading causes of death accounted for over 65.6 percent of all deaths among whites in Texas in 2006. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 7

Leading Causes of Death Figure 3. Leading Causes of Death Among African Americans, Texas, 2006 Diseases of heart 4,602 Malignant neoplasms 4,175 Cerebrovascular diseases 1,253 Accidents 955 Death Cause of death Diabetes mellitus Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis Chronic lower respiratory disease 521 493 884 Assault 483 HIV disease 451 Septicemia 414 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Number of deaths A total of 19,054 African American residents died in 2006. Of those, 14,231 died from the above leading causes. The leading cause of death, diseases of the heart, was responsible for 24.2 percent of all African American deaths while malignant neoplasms, the second most common cause of death, accounted for 21.9 percent. Cerebrovascular diseases ranked third and accounted for 6.6 percent of all deaths among African Americans. Accidents and diabetes were the fourth and fifth leading causes of death accounting for 5 percent each of all deaths among African Americans. Together, the five leading causes of death accounted for 62.3 percent of deaths among African Americans in Texas in 2006. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 8

Leading Causes of Death Figure 4. Leading Causes of Death Among Hispanics, Texas, 2006 Diseases of heart 5,976 Malignant neoplasms 5,639 Accidents 2,183 Cerebrovascular diseases 1,601 Cause of death Diabetes mellitus Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis 899 727 1,549 Death Septicemia 622 Chronic lower respiratory disease 568 Assault 567 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 Number of deaths There were a total of 28,077 deaths among Hispanics in Texas in 2006. Of those, 20,331 died from the above leading causes. The leading cause of death, diseases of the heart, was responsible for 21.3 percent of all Hispanic deaths while malignant neoplasms, the second most common cause of death, accounted for 20.1 percent. The third leading cause of death for Hispanics was accidents, which accounted for 8 percent of all deaths. Cerebrovascular diseases were the fourth leading cause of death (5.7 percent of all deaths) and diabetes (5.5 percent of all deaths) was the fifth leading cause of death. Together, these five leading causes of death represented 60.4 percent of all deaths among Hispanics in Texas in 2006. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 9

Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Figure 5. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Ischemic Heart Disease, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 227.7 150.4 186.3 241.1 161.6 76.6 184.6 2002 218.1 145.8 179.9 227 156.1 78.9 178 2003 203.4 135.6 170 211 139.3 70.6 165.8 2004 188.6 125.2 157.6 190.1 131.3 68.4 153.5 2005 188.7 122.1 153.3 190.2 139.8 71.3 151.8 2006 169.9 109.4 140.4 160.7 120.2 76.1 136.4 The overall age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) for ischemic heart disease (IHD) declined from 184.6 per 100,000 in 2001 to 136.4 per 100,000 in 2006. The decrease was statistically significant. AAMR for males and females and for whites and African Americans also showed significant decline during the same period. AAMR for Hispanics, however, stayed relatively level from 2001 to 2002, and then showed a significant decline from 2005 to 2006. While mortality rates due to IHD are declining, patterns of disease still show that Texas males have a significantly higher risk of dying from IHD than females. African Americans had a higher risk of dying from IHD than whites, Hispanics, and Other racial/ethnic groups. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 10

Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Figure 6. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Ischemic Heart Disease, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for IHD by Texas county. The different shades represent levels of statistical significance, as indicated in the map legend. White counties are those excluded due to small sample size (<25 deaths). East Texas had a high proportion of counties where IHD mortality rates were statistically significantly higher than the state rate. Central Texas had a high proportion of counties where IHD mortality rates were statistically significantly lower than the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 11

Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Figure 7. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Stroke, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 125.0 100.0 75.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 59.8 66.3 62.9 96.6 52.1 38.3 64.2 2002 57.5 64.6 61.6 90 49.9 40.4 62.3 2003 56.6 61 58.6 90.2 48.3 40.5 59.7 2004 52.5 57.5 54.8 85.6 45.4 34.2 55.9 2005 48.8 53.6 50.7 76.4 44.9 35 52.1 2006 47.6 51.9 48.9 73.7 44.1 41 50.4 The overall AAMR for stroke declined from 64.2 per 100,000 in 2001 to 50.4 per 100,000 in 2006. The decrease was statistically significant. Among the racial/ethnic groups, AAMR for whites showed a significant decrease from a high of 62.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 48.9 per 100,000 in 2006. Texas females had a significantly higher risk of dying from stroke than males. African Americans had significantly higher mortality rates compared to whites, Hispanics, and Other racial/ethnic groups. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 12

Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Figure 8. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Stroke, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for stroke by Texas county. North central Texas had a high proportion of counties where stroke mortality rates were statistically significantly higher than the state rate. South Texas had a high proportion of counties where IHD mortality rates were either statistically significantly lower than the state rate, or lower than the state rate but not significantly. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 13

Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Figure 9. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Congestive Heart Failure, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 22.4 23.4 24.7 26.5 15.0 10.6 23.2 2002 23.0 22.1 24.0 27.6 14.7 7.4 22.6 2003 21.5 21.6 23.4 24.0 14.8 6.3 21.8 2004 21.1 21.7 23.3 24.8 13.9 8.8 21.6 2005 21.1 21.8 23.5 24.3 14.1 8.3 21.7 2006 23.7 24.2 26.1 28.6 15.2 11.5 24.2 The overall AAMR for congestive heart failure (CHF) declined from 23.2 per 100,000 in 2001 to 21.7 per 100,000 in 2005, but increased to 24.2 per 100,000 in 2006. The decrease between 2001 and 2005 was not statistically significant, but the increase between 2005 and 2006 was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females. Whites and African Americans had significantly higher mortality rates compared to Hispanics and Other races. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 14

Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Figure 10. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Congestive Heart Failure, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for CHF by Texas county. East Texas had a high proportion of counties where CHF mortality rates were either statistically significantly higher than the state rate, or higher than the state rate but not significantly. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 15

Diabetes Figure 11. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Diabetes, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 33.0 30.5 23.3 56.0 55.8 19.2 31.7 2002 34.8 29.7 23.8 57.5 54.9 14.9 32.0 2003 34.4 29.1 23.7 55.3 52.3 16.3 31.4 2004 31.4 27.9 22.6 52.3 47.2 16.9 29.5 2005 32.3 27.5 21.4 54.5 51.7 14.5 29.7 2006 28.9 24.6 20.2 48.7 41.0 19.9 26.6 The overall AAMR for diabetes mellitus decreased significantly from 31.7 per 100,000 in 2001 to 26.6 per 100,000 in 2006. Texas males had a significantly higher risk of dying from diabetes than females. African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher mortality rates due to diabetes compared to whites and Other racial/ethnic groups. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 16

Diabetes Figure 12. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Diabetes, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for diabetes by Texas county. South Texas had a high proportion of counties where diabetes mortality rates were statistically significantly higher than the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 17

Lung Cancer Figure 13. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Lung Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 90.0 75.0 60.0 45.0 30.0 15.0 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 75.1 38.4 60.3 70.4 25.7 25.7 54.0 2002 75.5 39.7 62.0 69.4 26.4 21.1 54.9 2003 72.9 38.8 60.3 70.6 25.0 23.7 53.3 2004 69.5 38.9 58.5 70.1 25.0 25.5 52.0 2005 68.7 37.5 57.3 68.6 26.3 23.0 50.9 2006 65.5 37.4 56.7 58.8 25.2 27.7 49.5 The overall AAMR for lung cancer decreased slightly from 54.0 per 100,000 in 2001 to 49.5 per 100,000 in 2006, however the change was not statistically significant. Decreases in mortality rates can also be noted among males and African Americans during the same period. The decrease in rates was statistically significant among African Americans and males. Despite decreasing mortality rates overall, Texas males had approximately twice the rate of lung cancer deaths compared to females. African Americans had the highest mortality rates while Hispanics and Other racial/ethnic groups had the lowest mortality rates. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 18

Lung Cancer Figure 14. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Lung Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for lung cancer by Texas county. East Texas had a high proportion of counties where lung cancer mortality rates were statistically significantly higher than the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 19

Female Breast Cancer Figure 15. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Female Breast Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 24.9 25.4 37.8 17.5 10.3 24.9 2002 24.6 25.5 35.3 17.9 7.7 24.6 2003 24.5 25 38.7 17.1 10.2 24.5 2004 23.3 23.7 36.2 17.4 7.8 23.3 2005 23.4 24.2 35.5 17.5 6.5 23.4 2006 22.9 23.4 34.2 17.9 9.2 22.9 The overall AAMR for breast cancer showed a slight decrease from 24.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 22.9 per 100,000 in 2006. The decrease, however, was not statistically significant. African Americans had significantly higher mortality rates compared to whites, Hispanics, and Other racial/ethnic groups. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 20

Female Breast Cancer Figure 16. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Female Breast Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for breast cancer by Texas county. The majority of counties had breast cancer mortality rates (higher or lower) that did not statistically significantly differ from the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 21

Cervical Cancer Figure 17. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Cervical Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 2.6 7.4 4.6 2.9 3.5 2002 2.7 6.2 4.4 0.0 3.2 2003 2.6 5.2 4.7 2.1 3.2 2004 2.9 5.9 4.2 3.0 3.4 2005 2.2 5.1 3.9 3.3 2.9 2006 2.5 4.1 4.1 2.7 3.0 The overall AAMR for cervical cancer remained relatively stable from 2001 to 2006. African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher mortality rates compared to whites. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 22

Cervical Cancer Figure 18. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Cervical Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for cervical cancer by Texas county. Two counties, El Paso and Cameron, had rates that were statistically significantly higher than the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 23

Colorectal Cancer Figure 19. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Colorectal Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 23.1 15.9 19.1 29.3 15.3 10.2 19.1 2002 22.2 16.2 18.9 32.2 13.7 9.4 18.9 2003 21.7 15.6 18.0 32.3 13.5 10.0 18.2 2004 20.8 14.5 17.3 24.2 14.9 9.8 17.3 2005 20.3 14.3 16.8 28.5 13.5 8.1 16.9 2006 21.1 14.0 16.9 27.9 14.1 13.9 17.1 The overall AAMR for colorectal cancer decreased from 19.1 per 100,000 in 2001 to 17.1 per 100,000 in 2006. The decrease, however, was not statistically significant. Texas males had a significantly higher risk of dying from colorectal cancer than females. African Americans had significantly higher mortality rates compared to whites, Hispanics, and Other races. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 24

Colorectal Cancer Figure 20. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Colorectal Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for colorectal cancer by Texas county. The majority of counties had colorectal cancer mortality rates (higher or lower) that did not statistically significantly differ from the state rate. Areas of south Texas had rates that were statistically significantly lower than the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 25

Prostate Cancer Figure 21. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Prostate Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 24.9 57.8 23.9 9.9 27.0 2002 24.0 55.9 20.1 5.4 25.4 2003 22.0 53.0 19.4 7.7 23.5 2004 21.7 55.1 20.1 6.5 23.5 2005 22.1 48.2 17.3 8.5 22.9 2006 20.6 43.9 18.7 10.1 21.8 The overall AAMR for prostate cancer decreased significantly from 27.0 per 100,000 in 2001 to 21.8 per 100,000 in 2006. African Americans had significantly higher mortality rates compared to whites, Hispanics, and Other races. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 26

Prostate Cancer Figure 22. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 by County, Prostate Cancer, Texas, 2001-2006 Death The map above shows AAMRs for prostate cancer by Texas county. The majority of counties had prostate cancer mortality rates (higher or lower) that did not statistically significantly differ from the state rate. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 27

Asthma Figure 23. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Asthma, Texas, 2001-2006 Death Age-Adjusted Mortality rates per 100,000 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 1.1 1.5 1.3 2.9 1.0 1.9 1.4 2002 1.0 1.4 1.2 2.9 0.7 0.1 1.2 2003 1.0 1.4 1.2 2.9 0.6 0.8 1.2 2004 0.8 1.3 1.0 2.4 0.8 1.2 1.1 2005 0.9 1.5 1.1 3.4 0.8 1.2 1.2 2006 0.7 1.3 1.0 2.0 0.7 1.0 1.0 The overall AAMR for asthma stayed relatively stable from 2001 through 2006. Texas females had higher mortality rates from asthma than males, although these differences were not always statistically significant. Among the race/ethnicity groups, African Americans had significantly higher mortality rates compared to whites and Hispanics. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 28

Arthritis Figure 24. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000, Arthritis, Texas, 2001-2006 Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Other Total 2001 1.0 2.0 1.7 0.8 1.6 1.3 1.6 2002 1.0 2.0 1.7 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.6 2003 0.9 1.8 1.5 1.7 1.3 0.9 1.4 2004 1.1 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.4 0.6 1.5 2005 0.9 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.6 0.9 1.4 2006 0.7 1.8 1.4 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.3 Death The overall AAMR for arthritis stayed relatively stable from 2001 through 2006. Texas females had a significantly higher risk of dying from arthritis than males. No consistent patterns were apparent by race/ethnicity from 2001-2006. Data source: CHS, Texas Department of State Health Services 29

Prevalence 30

High Blood Pressure Figure 25. Prevalence of High Blood Pressure Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 1995-2007 Prevalence (%) 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 24.0 22.9 23.2 23.1 24.4 24.2 25.8 25.8 26.2 25.6 24.4 24.5 27.7 27.8 5.0 0.0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 US Texas In 2007, 27.8 percent of adult Texans reported having ever been told by a physician that they had high blood pressure. The prevalence of high blood pressure remained unchanged at approximately 24 percent between 1995 and 2005. There were no statistically significant differences between Texas and the U.S. from 1995 to 2007. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 31

High Blood Pressure Figure 26. Prevalence of High Blood Pressure Among Adults, 2007 70.0 60.0 58.0 Prevalence (%) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 27.7 27.8 27.7 28.0 29.1 41.4 21.7 16.3 38.9 10.0 7.8 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Prevalence Texas prevalence rates of high blood pressure were similar to the national average. Males and females had similar prevalence rates. Whites and African Americans had significantly higher prevalence rates of high blood pressure compared to Hispanics. High blood pressure prevalence increased significantly with increasing age. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 32

High Blood Pressure Figure 27. Prevalence of High Blood Pressure Among Adults by Health Service Region (HSR), 2007 The map above shows prevalence rates for high blood pressure by HSR. In 2007, prevalence of high blood pressure was highest in HSRs 2 and 5. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 33

High Blood Cholesterol Figure 28. Prevalence of High Blood Cholesterol Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 1995-2007 45.0 Prevalence (%) 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 33.4 28.7 28.4 28.6 30.9 31.8 30.0 30.9 34.3 35.9 33.6 34.0 38.5 37.3 10.0 5.0 0.0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 US Texas Prevalence The prevalence of adult Texans reporting having been told by a healthcare professional that they had high blood cholesterol increased between 1995 and 2007. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 34

High Blood Cholesterol Figure 29. Prevalence of High Blood Cholesterol Among Adults, 2007 Prevalence (%) 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 37.3 38.5 40.7 36.5 39.8 33.2 37.3 13.8 28.3 48.1 54.5 10.0 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Texas prevalence rates of high blood cholesterol were similar to the national average. Males had a significantly higher prevalence rate of high blood cholesterol compared to females. Whites had significantly higher prevalence rates of high blood cholesterol compared to African Americans. High blood cholesterol increased significantly with age. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 35

High Blood Cholesterol Figure 30. Prevalence of High Blood Cholesterol Among Adults by HSR, 2007 Prevalence In 2007, prevalence of high blood cholesterol was highest in HSR 5. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 36

Diabetes Figure 31. Prevalence of Diabetes Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 1995-2008 12.0 10.0 10.3 9.7 Prevalence (%) 8.0 6.0 4.0 5.2 4.7 4.8 3.7 5.9 5.6 5.2 5.5 6.2 5.9 6.4 6.2 7.1 7.1 6.8 7.0 8.1 7.7 7.5 7.2 7.9 8.1 7.8 8.0 8.6 8.8 2.0 0.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 US Texas In 2008, 9.7 percent of the adult Texas population reported ever having been diagnosed with diabetes. Diabetes prevalence rose steadily from 1995 through 2008, both in Texas and nationally. The prevalence of diabetes was nearly two times higher in 2008 compared to 1995, both in Texas and nationally. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 37

Diabetes Figure 32. Prevalence of Diabetes Among Adults, 2008 30.0 25.0 22.7 Prevalence (%) 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 8.8 9.7 9.8 9.7 8.3 13.0 11.1 1.8 4.6 14.6 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Prevalence Texas prevalence rates of diabetes were slightly higher than the national average, although this difference was not statistically significant Males and females had similar prevalence rates. African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher prevalence rates compared to whites. Diabetes prevalence statistically significantly increased with age. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 38

Diabetes Figure 33. Prevalence of Diabetes Among Adults by HSR, 2008 In 2008, prevalence of diabetes was highest in HSRs 2, 10, and 11. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 39

Smoking Figure 34. Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 1995-2008 30.0 25.0 Prevalence (%) 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 US 22.2 23.3 22.9 22.1 22.5 22.2 22.7 22.6 22.2 20.6 20.4 19.6 19.4 18.4 Texas 23.7 22.9 22.5 21.9 22.4 21.9 22.4 22.9 22.1 20.5 20.0 17.9 19.3 18.5 Prevalence Prevalence of adult smoking in Texas decreased significantly from 23.7 percent in 1995 to 18.5 percent in 2008. There were no statistically significant differences between Texas and the U.S. during this time period. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 40

Smoking Figure 35. Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking Among Adults, 2008 Prevalence (%) 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 18.4 18.5 22.3 14.8 19.5 21.8 16.7 22.0 19.8 19.6 8.3 5.0 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Texas prevalence rates of cigarette smoking were similar to the national average. Males had a significantly higher prevalence rate compared to females. African Americans and whites had slightly higher prevalence rates compared to Hispanics, although this difference was not statistically significant. Cigarette smoking prevalence decreased with increasing age, although not all of the comparisons achieved statistical significance. Adults age 65+ had significantly lower rates than the other age groups. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 41

Smoking Figure 36. Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking Among Adults by HSR, 2008 Prevalence In 2008, prevalence of cigarette smoking was highest in HSR 9. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 42

Smoking Figure 37. Percentage of High School Students Who Smoked One or More Cigarettes During the Past 30 Days, 2001, 2005, 2007 & 2009 2001 2005 2007 2009 Weighted Percent (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 31.8 26.3 23.0 24.1 24.9 22.0 19.118.2 30.6 28.9 26.523.9 13.6 14.2 10.8 11.9 Male Female White African American 30.8 23.1 22.5 19.3 Hispanic 28.4 24.221.121.2 Texas The prevalence of Texas students who reported current cigarette use (i.e., smoked cigarettes on > 1 of the 30 days preceding the survey) decreased significantly from 28.4 percent in 2001 to 21.2 percent in 2009. All subgroups, with the exception of African Americans, experienced a significant decrease in current cigarette use from 2001 to 2009. Overall, African American students were less likely to report current cigarette use than Hispanic or white students. Prevalence Data source: YRBS, Texas Department of State Health Services 43

Overweight and Obesity Figure 38. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 1995-2008 Prevalence (%) 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 51.8 51.4 52.9 52.0 55.9 57.2 53.2 54.5 65.7 66.2 62.8 62.9 64.1 61.3 61.5 62.3 58.2 59.7 60.2 63.0 61.5 62.8 63.0 56.1 57.3 58.6 58.8 59.4 20.0 10.0 0.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 US Texas Prevalence The prevalence of overweight and obesity (body mass index > 25) has increased considerably over the years. From 1995 through 2008, the prevalence of overweight and obesity increased by 28.8 percent in Texas and 21.6 percent in the U.S. Texas prevalence rates of overweight and obesity have been higher than the national average since 1996. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 44

Overweight and Obesity Figure 39. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among Adults, 2008 100.0 Prevalence (%) 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 63.0 66.2 72.8 59.3 61.6 72.6 74.6 54.9 70.5 70.6 64.5 20.0 10.0 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Texas prevalence rates of overweight and obesity were statistically significantly higher than the national average. Males had a significantly higher prevalence rate of overweight and obesity compared to females. African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher prevalence of overweight and obesity compared to whites. Persons age 18-29 had significantly lower rates of overweight and obesity compared to persons age 30+. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 45

Overweight and Obesity Figure 40. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among Adults by HSR, 2008 Prevalence In 2008, prevalence of overweight and obesity was highest in HSRs 1 and 11. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 46

Overweight and Obesity Figure 41. Prevalence of No Leisure Time Physical Activity Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 1995-2008 35.0 33.9 Prevalence (%) 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 27.6 29.7 29.1 29.0 28.5 27.9 27.9 27.8 27.1 26.4 29.3 25.3 27.6 26.1 24.6 24.0 27.4 28.4 28.3 28.5 25.5 24.2 24.2 25.5 5.0 0.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 US Texas From 2000 to 2008, the percentage of individuals who reported participating in no leisure time physical activity remained relatively unchanged for both Texas and the U.S. Prevalence of no leisure time physical activity has been slightly higher in Texas than in the U.S. since 2001. Prevalence Note: Texas data not available for 1995, 1997, or 1999. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 47

Overweight and Obesity Figure 42. Prevalence of No Leisure Time Physical Activity Among Adults, 2008 50.0 Prevalence (%) 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 25.5 28.5 25.4 31.5 24.2 31.2 34.5 23.1 26.9 30.7 35.7 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Prevalence Texas prevalence rates of no leisure time physical activity were significantly higher than the national average. Females were significantly less likely to participate in leisure time physical activity compared to males. Among the race/ethnicity groups, African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher prevalence rates of no leisure time physical activity compared to whites. Persons age 65 and older had significantly higher rates of no leisure time physical activity compared to other age groups. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 48

Overweight and Obesity Figure 43. Prevalence of No Leisure Time Physical Activity Among Adults by HSR, 2008 In 2008, prevalence of no leisure time physical activity was highest in HSRs 2 and 11. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 49

Overweight and Obesity Figure 44. Percentage of High School Students Who Are Overweight*, 2001, 2005, 2007 & 2009 2001 2005 2007 2009 100 90 80 Weighted Percent (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 15.0 14.5 15.5 15.5 14.4 15.515.8 15.7 11.2 12.413.3 11.0 19.9 19.5 22.0 17.817.4 16.3 17.1 17.8 14.715.015.6 15.6 10 0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Texas Prevalence The percentage of students who were overweight increased slightly from 2001 (14.7%) to 2009 (15.6%). However, the increase was not statistically significant. In 2009, the percentage of students who were overweight was greater among African American (22.0%) and Hispanic students (17.8%) than among white students (11.0%). The differences were statistically significant. No significant differences existed among students by gender. *Overweight: at or above the 85th percentile but below the 95th percentile for body mass index, by age and sex. Based on reference data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I and the 2000 CDC Growth Charts. Data source: YRBS, Texas Department of State Health Services 50

Overweight and Obesity Figure 45. Percentage of High School Students Who Are Obese*, 2001, 2005, 2007 & 2009 2001 2005 2007 2009 Weighted Percent (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 19.4 16.4 19.9 15.9 8.6 11.211.6 11.1 10.910.2 13.8 10.0 Male Female White African American 17.3 18.0 14.6 16.7 17.6 16.9 19.2 16.5 14.2 13.9 15.9 13.6 Hispanic Texas The percentage of high school students who reported being obese decreased from 14.2% in 2001 to 13.6% in 2009. However, the decrease was not statistically significant. Male students were more likely to report being obese than female students across all years reported. In 2009, the percentage of students who were obese was greater among African American (16.7%) and Hispanic students (16.5%) than among white students (10.0%). Prevalence *Obese: at or above the 95th percentile for body mass index, by age and sex. Data source: YRBS, Texas Department of State Health Services 51

Overweight and Obesity Figure 46. Percentage of Students Who Ate Fruits and Vegetables 5 or More Times per Day During the Past 7 Days, 2001, 2005, 2007 & 2009 2001 2005 2007 2009 Weighted Percent (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 22.4 21.0 20.2 23.7 17.3 17.6 14.6 18.8 17.9 17.215.0 18.8 24.0 26.1 23.6 19.5 Male Female White African American 20.6 18.615.2 22.5 19.9 19.4 17.4 21.3 Hispanic Texas Prevalence The percentage of students who reported that they ate fruits and vegetables five or more times per day during the past seven days decreased from 19.9 percent in 2001 to 17.4 percent in 2007. It then increased to 21.3 percent in 2009. Male students (20.2 in 2007, 23.7% in 2009) are more likely to report that they ate fruits and vegetables five or more times per day during the past seven days than female students (14.6% in 2007, 18.8% in 2009). The difference is statistically significant. Overall, African American students (19.5% in 2007, 23.6% in 2009) were more likely to report that they ate fruits and vegetables five or more times per day during the past seven days than white students (15.0% in 2007, 18.8% in 2009) and Hispanic students (18.2% in 2007, 22.5% in 2009). Data source: YRBS, Texas Department of State Health Services 52

Overweight and Obesity Figure 47. Percentage of High School Students Who Were Physically Active For a Total of at Least 60 Minutes per Day on Five or More of the Past 7 Days, 2005, 2007, 2009 2005 2007 2009 100 90 80 Weighted Percent (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 55.3 57.2 54.7 53.0 49.0 47.6 45.2 45.2 46.6 41.8 39.3 35.6 35.7 38.6 34.7 36.0 29.0 26.5 0 Male Female White African American Hispanic Texas The percentage of students who reported they were physically active for at least 60 minutes per day on five or more of the past seven days increased significantly from 2005 (36.0%) to 2009 (46.6%). In 2009, male students (57.2%) were significantly more likely to report they were physically active than female students (35.6%). In 2009, Hispanic students (39.3%) were less likely to report they were physically active compared to African American (47.6%) and white students (54.7%). The difference between Hispanics and whites was statistically significant. Prevalence Data source: YRBS, Texas Department of State Health Services 53

Asthma Figure 48. Prevalence of Current Asthma* Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 2002-2008 10.0 8.0 7.6 7.7 8.1 7.9 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.5 Prevalence (%) 6.0 4.0 7.1 6.9 7.1 6.8 7.3 7.3 2.0 0.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 US Texas Prevalence The prevalence of asthma in Texas remained relatively unchanged at approximately 7 percent between 2002 and 2008. There were no statistically significant differences between Texas and the U.S. from 2002 to 2008, although Texas had lower rates of asthma than the national average. *Respondents who had ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that they had asthma and still have asthma. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 54

Asthma Figure 49. Prevalence of Current Asthma* Among Adults, 2008 20.0 15.0 11.7 Prevalence (%) 10.0 5.0 8.5 7.3 6.3 8.4 8.7 4.5 7.6 5.9 8.2 8.3 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18 to 29 years 30 to 44 years 45 to 64 years 65+ years Texas had significantly lower rates of asthma than the national average. Females had higher prevalence rates compared to males, but the difference was not statistically significant. Among the race/ethnicity groups, African Americans and whites had statistically significantly higher prevalence rates compared to Hispanics. Asthma prevalence among adults does not differ significantly by age. Prevalence *Respondents who had ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that they had asthma and still have asthma. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 55

Asthma Figure 50. Prevalence of Current Asthma* Among Adults by HSR, 2008 Prevalence In 2008, prevalence of asthma was highest in HSRs 1, 3, and 7. *Respondents who had ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that they had asthma and still have asthma. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 56

Asthma Figure 51. Percentage of High School Students with Current Asthma*, 2005, 2007 & 2009 2005 2007 2009 100 90 80 Weighted Percent (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 15.0 8.1 8.1 15.5 19.1 11.610.5 11.6 9.9 Male Female White African American 16.613.8 16.2 15.3 9.9 9.8 9.3 6.7 6.5 Hispanic Texas The percentage of students who reported that they had asthma decreased from 2005 (15.3%) to 2009 (9.3%). The difference was statistically significant. In 2009, female students (10.5%) were more likely to report that they had asthma than male students (8.1%). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In 2009, African American students (16.2%) were more likely to report that they had asthma than white (9.9%) or Hispanic students (6.5%). The differences were statistically significant. Prevalence *Students who had ever been told by a doctor or nurse that they had asthma and still have asthma. Data source: YRBS, Texas Department of State Health Services 57

Arthritis Figure 52. Prevalence of Arthritis Among Adults, Texas & U.S., 2003, 2005, & 2007 50.0 40.0 Prevalence (%) 30.0 20.0 10.0 27.1 26.6 27.0 24.1 22.3 23.7 0.0 2003 2005 2007 US Texas Prevalence Texas had significantly lower rates of arthritis than the national average. The prevalence of arthritis remained stable over the years reported. However, the prevalence of arthritis in adult Texans remains high, at 24 percent, or almost 1 in every 4 adults. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 58

Arthritis Figure 53. Prevalence of Arthritis Among Adults, 2007 70.0 60.0 54.6 Prevalence (%) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 27.0 23.7 19.3 27.8 27.8 27.7 16.3 12.1 33.5 10.0 5.8 0.0 Nationwide Texas Male Female White African American Hispanic 18 to 29 years 30 to 44 years 45 to 64 years 65+ years Texas had significantly lower rates of arthritis than the national average. Females had significantly higher prevalence rates compared to males. Among the race/ethnicity groups, whites and African Americans had significantly higher prevalence rates than Hispanics. Arthritis prevalence increased significantly with increasing age. Prevalence Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 59

Arthritis Figure 54. Prevalence of Arthritis Among Adults by HSR, 2007 Prevalence In 2007, prevalence of arthritis was highest in HSRs 2 and 5. Data source: BRFSS, Texas Department of State Health Services 60

Hospitalization 61

Hospital Discharges Figure 55. Percent Distribution of Hospital Discharges by Age, Texas, 2008 100% 80% 45.5 52.0 63.0 26.8 Percent 60% 40% 20% 41.8 42.8 31.1 38.8 34.4 65+ 45-64 Less than 45 0% 12.7 5.2 5.9 Cancer IHD Any Stroke Diabetes (any type) In 2008, patients aged 65 years and older accounted for the highest proportion of hospital discharges for cancer (45.5%), IHD (52.0%) and stroke (63.0%). Discharges for diabetes-related diagnoses had a higher proportion of patients aged 45 to 64 years (38.8%) and 18 to 44 years (34.4%). Patients aged 65 years and older accounted for 26.8% of all diabetes-related hospital discharges. Hospitalization Data source: THCIC, Texas Department of State Health Services 62

Hospital Discharges Figure 56. Number of Selected Hospital Discharges by Primary Diagnosis, Texas, 2008 Alzheimer's Disease Type 1 Diabetes 2,949 10,423 Hypertension Asthma Type 2 Diabetes 25,691 26,899 30,663 Osteoarthritis Any Stroke 48,363 51,579 CHF 63,774 Cancer 78,490 IHD 96,510 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 In 2008, IHD had the highest number of discharges for chronic disease hospitalizations, followed by cancer, CHF, stroke, and osteoarthritis. All cancer, which includes lung, colon and rectum, breast, prostate, pancreas, non-hodgkin s lymphoma, leukemia, stomach, bladder, oral cavity, skin-melanoma, uterine corpus, uterine cervix, Hodgkin s disease, and neuroendocrine tumor, had the second highest number of discharges for chronic disease hospitalization. Data source: THCIC, Texas Department of State Health Services Hospitalization 63

Average Hospital Charge per Day Figure 57. Estimated Average Hospital Charge per Day for Selected CVD Diagnoses, Texas, 2003-2008 IHD $14,350 $13,451 $12,583 $11,352 $10,223 $8,995 Hemorrhagic Stroke $8,657 $7,974 $7,068 $6,339 $5,969 $5,425 Ischemic Stroke $7,191 $6,411 $5,193 $4,694 $4,199 $3,835 CHF $7,082 $6,708 $6,174 $5,696 $5,143 $4,476 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Estimated average hospital charges per day for selected CVD diagnoses have increased each year from 2003 to 2008. Among the specific CVD disease conditions, average hospital charges were highest for IHD, followed by hemorrhagic stroke, CHF, and ischemic stroke from 2003 to 2007. In 2008, average hospital charges were higher for ischemic stroke than CHF. Hospitalization Data source: THCIC, Texas Department of State Health Services 64