Dossier Quality Assistant

Similar documents
Evaluation & Reporting of Data: How to provide a (robust) study summary

Justification for the selection of a substance for CoRAP inclusion

Annex II - List of enforceable provisions of REACH and CLP

Justification Document for the Selection of a CoRAP Substance

EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN BECAUSE OF ITS CMR 1 PROPERTIES

Substance Name: Silicic acid, lead salt. EC Number: CAS Number: MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

How to bring your registration dossier in compliance with REACH Tips and Hints Part 2

Substance Name: Fatty acids, C16-18, lead salts. EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

Justification for the selection of a candidate CoRAP substance

Introduction Required data for substance identity purposes Dossier preparation (introduction) Substance identity of

Substance identity - screening of the registration dossiers

RISK MANAGEMENT OPTION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION DOCUMENT

Substance Name: Sulfurous acid, lead salt, dibasic. EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

Justification for the selection of a candidate CoRAP substance

MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF DIHEXYL PHTHALATE AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN BECAUSE OF ITS CMR PROPERTIES 1

Justification for the selection of a candidate CoRAP substance

Justification for the selection of a candidate CoRAP substance UPDATE

CONTACT DETAILS: EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY. Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, Helsinki, Finland. tel: ,

Justification for the selection of a candidate CoRAP substance

Category L Identity Profile Resin Oils & Cyclic Dienes

benzhydrylidene]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene]dimethylammonium chloride (C.I. Basic Violet 3) 1

Substance name: Potassium hydroxyoctaoxodizincatedichromate(1-) EC number: CAS number:

ANNEX XV REPORT AN ASSESSMENT OF WHETHER THE USE OF MUSK XYLENE IN ARTICLES SHOULD BE RESTRICTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 69(2) OF REACH

Justification Document for the Selection of a CoRAP Substance

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

Read-across illustrative example

Lead Metal and the 9 th ATP to CLP: Frequently Asked Questions

Substance Name: Trilead bis(carbonate) dihydroxide [Basic lead carbonate] EC Number: CAS Number: MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE

What is an Infocard? July 2018

Webinar: use of alternative methods to animal testing in your REACH registration

Comments CLH proposal Cadmium hydroxide

Developmental neurotoxicity & REACH

CATEGORY 4 - Rosin adduct esters UVCB CATEGORY JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT

H4R Consortium - Substance Identification. Monday 27 th April 2015

1,1 - iminodipropan-2-ol

Survey results - Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals

PHENOXY HERBICIDES CASE STUDY CONSIDERED IN CONTEXT OF ECHA RAAF

The proposed classification is Skin Sens. 1B H317 and the current classification is Skin Sens. 1 H317.

Substance Evaluation Conclusion document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION DOCUMENT. as required by REACH Article 48. for.

Stakeholders consultations on Info Cards and Brief Profiles

Substance Name: Pentalead tetraoxide sulphate. EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Substance Name: imidazolidine-2-thione (2-imidazoline-2-thiol) EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

Lead-up to REACH Pre-Registration

CLH report. Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling. Based on Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), Annex VI, Part 2

Substance Evaluation Conclusion document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION DOCUMENT. as required by REACH Article 48.

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

Annex XV dossier. PROPOSAL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF A SUBSTANCE AS A CMR CAT 1A OR 1B, PBT, vpvb OR A SUBSTANCE OF AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF CONCERN

Committee for Risk Assessment RAC. Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of potassium sorbate

Justification Document for the Selection of a CoRAP Substance

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Substance Evaluation Conclusion document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION DOCUMENT. as required by REACH Article 48.

Roadmap of SVHC identification and implementation of REACH risk management measures 1

Official Journal of the European Union

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION: ESTABLISHING REFERENCE DNELs FOR 1-BROMOPROPANE (1-BP)

Trisodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA)

Substance identity and sameness of Oleochemicals. M.Mennicken-Meuthen Brussels, 27 April 2015 Peter Greven GmbH & Co.KG

Official Journal of the European Union L 109/11

Guidance on information requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance

HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINAL PRODUCT WORKING GROUP (HMPWG) POINTS TO CONSIDER ON THE JUSTIFICATION OF HOMEOPATHIC USE

4-hydroxybenzoic acid

Restrictions in the use of biocides for disinfection procedures

Committee for Risk Assessment RAC

Annex XV report PROPOSAL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SET OUT IN REACH ARTICLE 57

Room: 0D Centre Albert Borschette Rue Froissart Brussels, Belgium

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Nickel : one of the strongest documented metal

Adopted by CVMP 10 March Date for coming into effect 1 July Revised draft guideline agreed by Immunologicals Working Party 22 June 2017

Annex XV. 2,4 - Dinitrotoluene

Substance Evaluation Conclusion document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION DOCUMENT. as required by REACH Article 48.

CLH report. Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling. Based on Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), Annex VI, Part 2

GUIDANCE ON SUBMISSIONS FOR SAFETY EVALUATION OF SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS OR OF OTHER INGREDIENTS PROPOSED FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOODS

AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

The Future of Tin Stabilisers in PVC Applications: Update after Tier 1 Reach Registration

Reproductive toxicity classification under CLP (Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of chemicals)

ANNEX 4 TO FINAL REPORT

Draft Agreed by Immunologicals Working Party January Adoption by CVMP for release for consultation 12 March 2009

ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment: Evaluation of the Classification and Labelling of Glyphosate

The effect of REACH implementation on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing Jan van Benthem

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

Introduction to principles of toxicology and risk assessment

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)

Substance Evaluation Conclusion Document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION. as required by REACH Article 48 and EVALUATION REPORT.

AP STATISTICS 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Committee for Risk Assessment RAC

Committee for Risk Assessment RAC. Annex 1 Background document to the Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of

Substance Evaluation Conclusion document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION. as required by REACH Article 48 and EVALUATION REPORT.

CLH REPORT FOR 2-METHYL-1-(4-METHYLTHIOPHENYL)-2-MORPHOLINOPROPAN-1- ONE. CLH report. Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

4,4'-[(isopropylidene)bis(pphenyleneoxy)]diphthalic

Food additives. FAO guidelines on the structure and content of the document called "Chemical and Technical Assessment (CTA)" Rome, February 2003

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

How to bring your registration dossier in compliance with REACH Tips and Hints - Part 5

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

Chemicals and Health & Safety at work, a European perspective. Tony Musu, European Trade Union Institute Kemiens Dag 16 Copenhagen, 23 November 2016

Prof. Marina Heinonen University of Helsinki Member of the NDA Panel and EFSA s WG on Novel Foods

Substance name: Alkanes, C 10-13, chloro (SCCPs) EC number: CAS number:

Observations: UN Global List Pilot Project versus Published GHS Classifications


Transcription:

Overview of DQA rules 6 March 2014 Dossier Quality Assistant This document gives an overview of the rules covered by the Dossier Quality Assistant (DQA), which is incorporated in the IUCLID Validation Assistant plug-in. The rules are divided into two rule sets: Substance identity rules (applicable for registration, inquiry) Dossier quality rules (applicable for registration) The rules reflect what ECHA expects from a high-quality dossier. This document will be updated to be kept in line with the development of the DQA. Users should analyse the warnings given by the DQA to see if these are relevant to the registrant s own situation; exceptions may apply. 6 March, 2014 1

DQA Substance identity rules Further information needed Inconsistent information Mass balances Mono- and multi-constituent conventions UVCB 3/6/2014 2

DQA Substance identity rules Further information needed Section 1.1/1.2 All reference substances should contain a IUPAC name Section 1.2 Complete degree of purity ranges Complete concentration ranges Typical concentrations provided Section 1.4 Indication of optical activity provided* * Only for Article 10 registrations. 3/6/2014 3

DQA Substance identity rules Inconsistent information Section 1.1/1.2 Consistent CAS numbers inside reference substance Section 1.2 Consistent use of concentration units within a composition preferably % (w/w) Sound concentration values, 0 100 % Typical concentration inside of concentration ranges Only additives with stabilising function to be reported Each reference substance to appear only once inside a composition 3/6/2014 4

DQA Substance identity rules Mass balances* Section 1.2 consistency main constituents / purity Main constituent concentrations to be consistent with purity: n i=1 n i=1 c i max purity max c i min purity min Sum of max. concentrations not below maximum purity. Sum of min. concentrations not above minimum purity. c i typ,max purity max n c i max + c j min purity max j=1, j i No main constituent concentration should be above the maximum purity. Each main constituent should be able to adopt its maximum value without compromising the maximum purity. * Only for mono- and multi-constituent substances 3/6/2014 5

DQA Substance identity rules Mass balances* Section 1.2 consistency impurities / purity Impurity concentrations to be consistent with purity: n purity max + c i min 100% i=1 n purity min + c i max 100% i=1 Sum of min. concentrations should be consistent with maximum purity. Sum of max. concentrations should be consistent with minimum purity. purity min + c i typ,max 100% purity min + c i max + c j min 100% n j=1, j i No impurity concentration should violate the minimum purity. Each impurity should be able to adopt its maximum value without compromising the minimum purity. * Only for mono- and multi-constituent substances 3/6/2014 6

DQA Substance identity rules Mono- and multi-constituent substances Section 1.2, mono-constituent substances One main constituent reported at 80% Concentration of individual impurities 20% Sum of impurity minimum concentrations 20% Section 1.2, multi-constituent substances Main constituents reported at 10 80% Concentration of individual impurities 10% 3/6/2014 7

DQA Substance identity rules UVCB substances Section 1.1 Description of manufacturing process provided in 1.1 reference substance Section 1.2 Section 1.1 reference substance not used as a constituent in the composition As impurities are not relevant for UVCB, only constituents and additives (if relevant) are reported 3/6/2014 8

DQA Dossier quality rules Tonnage information Use description Composition / Classification Endpoint study record approach Other 3/6/2014 9

DQA Dossier quality rules Tonnage information Section 3.2 Recent tonnage information provided when creating a dossier Years consistently reported (no duplicates, gaps) Information on intermediate tonnages provided Phase-in substances contain at least three years of tonnage information Dossier header / section 3.2 Section 3.2 tonnage consistent with registered tonnage (dossier template/header) 3/6/2014 10

DQA Dossier quality rules Use description (1) Section 3.5 intermediates* No uses should be reported in last three tables (professional uses, consumer uses, article service life) Uses with PROC codes consistent with Article 17/18 definition Uses with ERC codes consistent with Article 17/18 definition JS LEAD dossiers (standard template, only intermediate own uses, providing joint CSR) can include uses contradicting the above rules if they correspond to uses from a full member registration, and are flagged as Use covered by a joint CSR but not a lead own use * Only SCC-intermediate tonnage bands covered in own registration. 3/6/2014 11

DQA Dossier quality rules Use description (2) Section 3.5 all Uses flagged as Use covered by joint CSR only if dossier is covered by joint CSR (dossier header) Manufacture table only filled when legal entity roles include manufacturer (section 1.1) If uses are indicated to have subsequent service life, entries are provided in the article service life table, and vice versa If uses have ERC codes indicative of inclusion in article, entries are provided in the article service life table 3/6/2014 12

DQA Dossier quality rules Composition / Classification Section 1.2, composition on CLP Annex VI* If section 1.1 or 1.2 constituent reference substance is listed on CLP Annex VI, this needs to be considered in the C&L If impurity or additive is listed on Annex VI, this should be considered in the C&L and indicated if relevant for the classification and labelling of the substance Section 2.1 C&L blocks indicated as not classified should not contain a classification C&L blocks in 2.1 with hazard statement in the Labelling part should contain a classification If an impurity/additive is marked as relevant for the classification and labelling of the substance in section 1.2, this should be reflected by a classification in section 2.1** * The rules do not compare against the harmonised classification or the cut-off concentration value, they just alert the user that the substance has a harmonised classification because a match with Annex VI was found. ** Does not concern JS MEMBER dossier with no section 2.1 3/6/2014 13

DQA Dossier quality rules Endpoint study record approach (1) Administrative data purpose flag Study report, data waiver and/or testing proposal should be provided in separate endpoint study records Each endpoint study record has an indicated purpose Key studies have a high reliability Key studies do not have the reference type secondary source Weight of evidence approach is based on more than one endpoint study record Disregarded studies are of low reliability Disregarded studies contain a rationale for reliability 3/6/2014 14

DQA Dossier quality rules Endpoint study record approach (2) Administrative data waiving Data waiving records should only contain information in justification field Justification for data waiving should only be provided in records indicated as data waiving Approach to waive all requirements in sections 5, 6, 7 needs to be carefully considered and justified Inconsistent information Recent study (2009->) provided in in sections 5, 6, 7 should be performed according to GLP When a test guideline was used with deviations, explanation on deviations needs to be given 3/6/2014 15

DQA Dossier quality rules Other General inconsistencies EINECS substances should be registered as phase-in Only representative should not have manufacturing sites inside the EEA All manufacturing sites are expected to be located in the same country as the legal entity Section 7, endpoint summary If the route of exposure does not match original study, a justification needs to be provided The overall assessment factor (AF) should match the product of individual AFs 3/6/2014 16