International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) INFORMATION on Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30.

Similar documents
Radionuclide Concentrations in Food and the Environment

Protection action levels for radionuclides in foodstuffs in the context of an emergency, based on Health Canada guidance.

33 Codex Standard

Ionizing radiation. What is ionizing radiation?

What is the current risk of radiation-related health problems in Japan to those near the reactor at the time, and those in other parts of Japan?

Is there a risk of radioactive exposure from food contamination?

IAEA Safety Standards for Emergency Preparedness and Response: Focus on criteria for radionuclides in food, milk and drinking water

IONIZING RADIATION, HEALTH EFFECTS AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES

Radioactive materials in foods


Regulation Values for Radioactive

REPORT NO. 5. background material. for the development of. radiation protection. standards. July Staff Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL

Further information on many aspects of WHO'S work is presented in the Organization's ~ublications.

Preliminary Results of Modelling Radionuclide Depositions in Agricultural and Forest Environments Using the CHERPAC Code

Radiation in Everyday Life

Effects of Radiation on Human In the Face of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

COMPILATION OF INGESTION DOSE RESULTS

Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the Protection of People in

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER S: RISK REDUCTION CATEGORIES 3. RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF SEVERE ACCIDENTS

The health risks of exposure to internal radiation. Korea National Assembly Seoul 22 nd August 2015

Topic: What Emergency Management Professionals Should Know about Antidotes for Radiological Agents

ICRP 128 ICRP ICRP ICRP 1928

IAEA-TECDOC-473 REVISED GUIDANCE ON THE PRINCIPLES FOR ESTABLISHING INTERVENTION LEVELS

1. Update on airborne iodine-131 measurements in France

Projects on environment and production of clean foods

F. Paquet, M.R. Bailey, R.W. Leggett, T. Fell, T. Smith, V. Berkovski and J.D. Harrison ICRP C2

IAEA Technical Meeting Amman, Jordan. Uranium Exploration and Mining Methods

Ionizing Radiation. Alpha Particles CHAPTER 1

Radiation Effects. Radiobiology Steve Curtis Desert Research Institute

A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF THE CHERNOBYL REACTOR ACCIDENT ON THE POPULATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMRUNITY

Understanding Radiation and Its Effects

APPLICATION OP INTERVENTION DOSE LEVELS AND DERIVED INTERVENTION LEVELS IN THE EVENT OF A MAJOR NUCLEAR ACCIDENT: REVIEW OP PRESENT STATUS

Radiological Preparedness & Emergency Response. Session V. Objectives. Clinical Evaluation and Management of Internal Contamination

Exposure to Background Radiation In Australia

Pursuant to section 24 of the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, this licence is issued to:

CONTROLLABLE DOSE: A discussion on the control of individual doses from single sources. Roger H Clarke

Estimation of annual effective dose to the adult Egyptian population due to natural radioactive elements in ingestion of spices

Annex V of Technical Volume 4 UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE TO THE PUBLIC

Radon Guidance for Local Authorities

Agenda Item 14 CX/FFP 12/32/14

RADIATION SAFETY DIRECTORATE

Konstantin Kotenko and Sergey Shinkarev

Environmental Impact of Potential Accidental Releases from Nuclear Energy Systems situation in Belarus

Fukushima nuclear power plant and your health

Training Course on Medical Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency Pre- Test - BASIC

Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide (KI) in Radiological Emergencies*: Information for Physicians

Hazards + uses of emissions; Background radiation

An update: Dealing with radiation as a hazard. WAJ Meintjes MBChB; DOM; FCPHM(SA) Occ Med; MMed (Occ Med)

Comments of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the draft revised International Health Regulations of the World Health Organization

Monitoring radiation levels in the Pacific Northwest

Food Safety and the SPS Agreement. Dr Gerald G. Moy Manager, GEMS/Food Department of Food Safety World Health Organization

TESTIMONY OF John D. Boice, Jr., Sc.D.

2. THE RECONSTRUCTION AND MAPPING OF 1-131, CE-144 AND RU-106 CONTAMINATION IN APRIL-MAY 1986

Malcolm Crick, Secretary of UNSCEAR

Medical Use of Radioisotopes

CDC S Rapid Radionuclide Screen Improvements, New Methods, and Plans for the Future

Emergency Report on Radioactive Nuclides in Foods

Nuclear Radiation Today

STANDARD FOR CANNED BABY FOODS CODEX STAN * Adopted in Amended in 1983, 1985, 1987, 1989, * Formerly CAC/RS

Nuclear Plant Emergency Response. NPP Function and Malfunction: Historical Overview. Why is this training program important to you?

ADVICE ON SETTING A REFERENCE LEVEL FOR RADON CONCENTRATIONS IN LONG- STAY INSTITUTIONS

RADIATION HAZARDS. A dabbler s perspective. Jess H. Brewer

THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT

Thomas S. Tenforde. President CIRMS 2006 Conference. National Institute of Standards & Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland October 23-25, 2006

Experience on radioactivity monitoring of scrap metals in Madagascar

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

Draft of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition

RADIATION SAFETY DIRECTORATE

2. SAMPLING. U.S. Department of Energy. 201 Varick Street, 5th Floor New York, NY i

Nuclear Information and Resource Service th Street NW Suite 404 Washington, DC Tel

Ionizing Radiation. Michael J. Vala, CHP. Bristol-Myers Squibb

1. The Accident of Chernobyl Unit 4 of 1,000 MWe Graphite-Moderated Boiling Water Pressure Tube Reactor in 1986

Application of IDEAS Guidelines: the IDEAS/IAEA Intercomparison Exercise on Internal Dose Assessment.

Presentation. To the BAPE Panel on Uranium Mining In Quebec. by Gordon Edwards, Ph.D. November 17, 2014

Joint ICTP-IAEA School of Nuclear Energy Management August The IAEA Safety Standards. Dominique Delattre IAEA, Vienna Austria

DOWNLOAD OR READ : IONIZING RADIATION EFFECTS IN ELECTRONICS FROM MEMORIES TO IMAGERS DEVICES CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS BOOK 50 PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Introduction To Nuclear Power Module 3: Understanding Radiation and Its Effects

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Potassium Iodide (KI) Questions & Answers for Schools (Revised January 2007)

Radiobiology Hall 14: Radiologic Terrorism (Completed)

FOOD IRRADIATION within the EU

Designing and Implementing a Bioassay Program GD-150

REVISED CODEX GENERAL STANDARD FOR IRRADIATED FOODS CODEX STAN , REV

Fukushima Emergency Planning Zones, Use of Potassium Iodide, Health Effects

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT: CURRENT SITUATION IN THE PHILIPPINES

Radiation Safety Guide. Analytical X-Ray Equipment

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

MEDICAL SCIENCES - Vol.II -The Need For an International Approach The Role of FAO and WHO - Jorgen Schlundt and Kazuaki Miyagishima

Protecting Yourself in a Nuclear Emergency with Potassium Iodide

IAEA-TECDOC Reference Asian Man: Ingestion and Organ Content of Trace Elements of Importance in Radiological Protection

Director-General, Department of Food Safety, Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Module 34: Legal aspects, ADI and GRAS status of food additives

REVIEW Nuclear Disaster after the Earthquake and Tsunami of March 11

Compounding KI for Radiation Exposure

nuclear science and technology

The Codex Alimentarius

WORKERS IN A NUCLEAR FACILITY

An Open Letter To IAEA

PROTECTION IN A NUCLEAR EMERGENCY

Transcription:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) INFORMATION on Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30. March 2011 This document is intended to provide basic background information and not to give a complete overview. It will be updated as appropriate. 1. Introduction Radioactive isotopes of elements (radionuclides) are naturally present in the environment, and that includes our bodies and our food and water. We are exposed to radiation (also known as background radiation) from these radionuclides on a daily basis. Radiation comes from space (i.e., cosmic rays) as well as from naturally-occurring radioactive materials (radionuclides) found in the soil, water and air. Radioactivity can be detected in food and water and the concentration of naturally-occurring radionuclides varies depending on several factors such as local geology, climate and agricultural practices. People can also be exposed to radiation from man-made activities, including medical diagnostic intervention. Radioactivity can contaminate food after it has been discharged into the environment from industries that concentrate natural radionuclides and from civil or military nuclear operations. Whether, man-made or natural in origin, radioactive material passes through the food chain in the same way as non-radioactive material. The degree of harm to human health depends on the type of radionuclides and the length of time people are exposed to it. The amount of radiation people are exposed to varies from place to place and among individuals. In the event of releases of radioactivity following an emergency at a nuclear power plant, land, rivers, sea and structures in the vicinity of the power plant can become contaminated with a mixture of radionuclides generated inside the reactor, also known as nuclear fission products. Individuals can therefore become exposed to radiation from these fission products. 2. Radionuclides in food Background levels of radionuclides in foods vary and are dependent on several factors, including the type of food and the geographic region where the food has been produced. The common radionuclides in food are potassium-40 ( 40 K), radium-226 ( 226 Ra) and uranium 238 ( 238 U) and their associated progeny. In general, 40 K is the most commonly occurring natural radioisotope. In milk, for example, levels of 40 K measure around 50 Bq/L, and for meat, bananas and other potassium rich products, levels may measure at several hundreds Bq/kg. Other natural radioisotopes exist in much lower concentrations, and originate from the decay of uranium and thorium. When large amounts of radioisotopes are discharged into the environment, they can affect foods by either falling onto the surface of foods like fruits and vegetables or animal feed as deposits from the air or through contaminated rainwater/snow. Radioactivity in water can also accumulate in rivers and the sea, depositing on fish and seafood. Once in the environment, radioactive material can also become incorporated into food as it is taken up by plants, seafood or ingested by animals. 1

Although many different kinds of radionuclides can be discharged following a major nuclear emergency, some are very short-lived and others do not readily transfer into food. Radionuclides generated in nuclear installations and that could be significant for the food chain include; radioactive hydrogen ( 3 H), carbon ( 14 C), technetium ( 99 Tc), sulphur ( 35 S), cobalt ( 60 Co) strontium ( 89 Sr and 90 Sr), ruthenium ( 103 Ru and 106 Ru), iodine ( 131 I and 129 I), uranium ( 235 U) plutonium ( 238 Pu, 239 Pu and 240 Pu), caesium ( 134 Cs and 137 Cs), cerium ( 103 Ce), iridium ( 192 Ir), and americium ( 241 Am). The radionuclides of most concern for possible transfer to foods have been considered when setting the Codex Guideline levels described below. Of immediate concern is iodine-131, it is distributed over a wide area, found in water and on crops and is rapidly transferred from contaminated feed into milk. However, iodine-131 has a relatively short half-live and will decay within a few weeks. In contrast, radioactive caesium which can also be detected early on, is longer-lived (Cs-134 has a half life of about 2 years and Cs-137 has a half life of about 30 years) and can remain in the environment for a long-time. Radioactive caesium is also relatively rapidly transferred from feed to milk. Uptake of caesium into food is also of longterm concern. Other radioisotopes that could be of long-term concern if released, are strontium and plutonium. Strontium-90 has a half life of about 29 years and plutonium has a much longer half life than that (Pu-238: 88 years, Pu-239: 24100 years, Pu-240: 6564 years). However, both strontium and plutonium are relatively immobile in the environment and are of concern more locally, thus it is unlikely to cause a problem in international food trade in the immediate and medium-term. Commodities of concern Open-air vegetables and plants can be affected by the atmospheric release of radionuclides, resulting in radioactive contamination. Thus, radionuclides tend to be detected from leafy vegetables especially the ones with large leafy parts in the early phase after a nuclear accident. Milk is also associated with the early-phase contamination due to the rapid transfer of radioactive iodine and "relatively" rapid transfer of radioactive caesium from contaminated feed into milk. Over time, radioactivity can also build up within food, as radionuclides are transferred through soil into crops or animals, or into rivers, lakes and the sea where fish and other seafood could take up the radionuclides. Foods collected from the wild, such as mushrooms, berries and game meat, may continue to be a radiological problem for a long time. Fish and aquatic microflora may bioconcentrate certain radionuclides, but due to the high dilution of radionuclides in water, contamination tends to be confined relatively locally. 3. Health effects The main health concern for consumers in the long term due to high radiation exposure is development of cancer. Cancer types and target organs depend on the radionuclides. IAEA estimates that on average, our radiation exposure due to all natural sources amounts to about 2.4 msv a year - though this figure can vary, depending on the geographical location by several hundred percent. In Canada, the average dose due to naturally occurring background radiation is about 2 msv per year, of which about one-half comes from the inhalation of naturallyoccurring radon and its short-lived decay products. About 0.7 msv per year, nationally-averaged, arises from cosmic and terrestrial gamma radiation. The portion of the background dose resulting from ingestion of natural radionuclides in food is about 0.25-0.4 msv per year. Consuming contaminated food will increase the amount of radioactivity inside a person and therefore increase their exposure to radiation, thereby possibly increasing the health risks associated with radiation exposure. The exact health effects will depend on which radionuclides have been ingested and the amount being ingested. Examples for exposure from contaminated foods: - Adult eating 200g spinach contaminated with 1000Bq/kg of Cs-137 resulting in 0.0026 msv additional exposure 2

[0.2 (kg) 1000 (Bq/kg) 1.3 10-5 (msv/bq)] - One-year old child consuming 0.5 L milk contaminated with 100 Bq/L of I-131 resulting in 0.009 msv additional exposure [0.5 (L) 100 (Bq/L) 1.8 10-4 (msv/bq)] Radioactive iodine (I-131) in food is of immediate concern due to its rapid transfer to milk from contaminated feed and its accumulation in the thyroid gland. I-131has a relatively short half-life (8 days) and will therefore naturally decay over a short time frame. If radioactive iodine is breathed in or swallowed, it will concentrate in the thyroid gland and increase the risk of thyroid cancer. The uptake of radioactive iodine into the thyroid gland can be decreased or prevented by ingestion of non-radioactive iodine, by taking potassium iodide pills. Once the thyroid is saturated with iodine, no further iodine can be incorporated. Iodized table salt should not be used as an alternative to potassium iodide pills as it does not contain sufficient iodine to saturate the thyroid, and high salt intake may have adverse health effects. Radioactive caesium (Cs-134 and Cs-137), in contrast to radioactive iodine, has a long half-life (Cs-134: 2 years, Cs-137: 30 years). Radioactive caesium can stay in the environment for many years and could continue to present a longer term problem for food, and food production, and a threat to human health. If caesium-137 enters the body, it is distributed fairly uniformly throughout the body's soft tissues, resulting in exposure of those tissues. Compared to some other radionuclides, caesium-137 remains in the body for a relatively short time. Like all radionuclides, exposure to radiation from caesium-137 results in an increased risk of cancer. Other radionuclides could be of concern, depending on the nature of the nuclear accident and release of specific isotopes. 4. International standards and guidance The Codex Guideline Levels The Codex Alimentarius Commission (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme) has developed the guideline levels for certain radionuclides in food following a nuclear emergency (General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (GSCTFF), CODEX STAN 193-1995, page 33-37). The Guideline Levels have been first developed in 1988 and then revised in 2006 to increase the number of radionuclides covered. These Guideline Levels are applied to foods destined for human consumption and traded internationally, which have been contaminated following a nuclear or radiological emergency. If radionuclide levels in food do not exceed the corresponding guidelines levels, the food should be considered as safe for human consumption as far as generic radiological protection of food consumers is concerned. The following text is from the GSCTFF and provides the proper context: Scope: The Guideline Levels apply to radionuclides contained in foods destined for human consumption and traded internationally, which have been contaminated following a nuclear or radiological emergency 1. These guideline levels apply to food after reconstitution or as prepared for consumption, i.e., not to dried or concentrated foods, and are based on an intervention exemption level of 1 msv in a year. Application: As far as generic radiological protection of food consumers is concerned, when radionuclide levels in food do not exceed the corresponding Guideline Levels, the food should be considered as safe for human consumption. When the Guideline Levels are exceeded, national governments shall decide whether and under what circumstances the food should be distributed within their territory or jurisdiction. National governments may wish to adopt different values for internal use within their own territories where the assumptions concerning food distribution that have been made to derive the Guideline Levels may not apply, e.g., in the case of wide-spread radioactive contamination. For foods that are consumed in small quantities, 1 For the purposes of this document, the term emergency includes both accidents and malevolent actions. 3

such as spices, that represent a small percentage of total diet and hence a small addition to the total dose, the Guideline Levels may be increased by a factor of 10. Radionuclides: The Guideline Levels do not include all radionuclides. Radionuclides included are those important for uptake into the food chain; are usually contained in nuclear installations or used as a radiation source in large enough quantities to be significant potential contributors to levels in foods, and; could be accidentally released into the environment from typical installations or might be employed in malevolent actions. Radionuclides of natural origin are generally excluded from consideration in this document. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CODEX STAN 193, page 33-37) is available in English at: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/17/cxs_193e.pdf Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture The Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture provides advice on immediate actions to prevent and mitigate the radioactive contamination of agricultural foodstuffs when a nuclear emergency occurs in or affect your area. You will find the advice, counter measures, glossary and other relevant information at: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/emergency/index.html 5. Analytical methods and Laboratories Routine monitoring of the food supply is undertaken by several national authorities. For example the US FDA has published a method for the determination of Gamma-Ray Emitting Radionuclides in Foods by High-Purity Germanium Spectrometry http://www.fda.gov/downloads/scienceresearch/fieldscience/ucm248262.doc After a nuclear accident monitoring the agricultural, forestry and fisheries environment and restriction of the movement and export of possibly contaminated products is an important factor. However, an implementation of such monitoring can be complex, expensive and technically demanding and require certain training and quality assurance of laboratory performance in advance. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) has established and coordinates a world-wide network of the analytical laboratories called "ALMERA network (Analytical Laboratories for the Measurement of Environmental Radioactivity)". Those laboratories in the ALMERA network would be expected to provide reliable and timely analysis of environmental samples including food in the event of an accidental or intentional release of radioactivity. ALMERA currently (April 2010) consists of 122 laboratories representing 77 countries. The website of ALMERA Network: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/naml/page.php?page=2244 A full listing of the current ALMERA member laboratories can be found in the ALMERA Newsletter: http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/newsletter.asp?id=146 Generic procedures for monitoring in a nuclear or radiological emergency (IAEA, 1999): http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/te_1092_web.pdf (File size: 28MB) Programmes and systems for source and environmental radiation monitoring (IAEA Safety Reports Series No.64, 2010): http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/pub1427_web.pdf 6. Useful links and references Links FAO Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department (Joint division for nuclear techniques) http://www.fao.org/ag/portal/age-index/en/ 4

http://www.fao.org/crisis/japan/en/ WHO http://www.who.int/hac/crises/jpn/en/index.html Canada Canadian Guidelines for the Restriction of Radioactively Contaminated Food and Water Following a Nuclear Emergency (Health Canada, 2000) : http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewhsemt/pubs/contaminants/emergency-urgence/index-eng.php European Commission Maximum level of radioactive contamination in foodstuffs: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/food_safety/contamination_environmental_factors/l211 09_en.htm USA Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Human Food and Animal Feeds: Recommendations for State and Local Agencies" (FDA, 1998): http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/uc M094513.pdf Supporting Document for Guidance Levels for Radionuclides in Domestic and Imported Foods (FDA, 2004): http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/foodcontaminantsadulteration/chemicalcontaminants/r adionuclides/ucm078341 References Radioactive fallout in soils, crops and food (FAO, 1989) http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0228e/t0228e00.htm Application of the Commission's Recommendations to the Protection of People Living in Longterm Contaminated Areas after a Nuclear accident or a Radiation Emergency (ICPR Publication 111, 2008) Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2, 2011): http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/pub1467_web.pdf Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments (IAEA Technical Reports Series No.472, 2010): http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/trs472_web.pdf Measurement of Radionuclides in Food and the Environment A Guidebook, Technical Reports Series No. 295 (IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 295, 1989), Hard copy only. Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments (IAEA TECDOC Series No.1616, 2009). http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/te_1616_web.pdf 5