Processing in The Superior Olivary Complex

Similar documents
The Auditory Nervous System

Processing in The Cochlear Nucleus

The Central Auditory System

Lecture 7 Hearing 2. Raghav Rajan Bio 354 Neurobiology 2 February 04th All lecture material from the following links unless otherwise mentioned:

Spatial hearing and sound localization mechanisms in the brain. Henri Pöntynen February 9, 2016

J Jeffress model, 3, 66ff

Creating a sense of auditory space

Auditory System & Hearing

Hearing in the Environment

Hearing and the Auditory System: Overview

Binaural Hearing. Steve Colburn Boston University

21/01/2013. Binaural Phenomena. Aim. To understand binaural hearing Objectives. Understand the cues used to determine the location of a sound source

Development of Sound Localization Mechanisms in the Mongolian Gerbil Is Shaped by Early Acoustic Experience

Binaural Interactions in the Auditory Brainstem

INTRODUCTION. 475 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 (1), January /98/103(1)/475/19/$ Acoustical Society of America 475

HST.723J, Spring 2005 Theme 3 Report

COM3502/4502/6502 SPEECH PROCESSING

Convergent Input from Brainstem Coincidence Detectors onto Delay-Sensitive Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus

Auditory System. Barb Rohrer (SEI )

Sound movement detection deficit due to a brainstem lesion

The neural code for interaural time difference in human auditory cortex

NEW ROLES FOR SYNAPTIC INHIBITION IN SOUND LOCALIZATION

Representation of sound in the auditory nerve

Binaural Spectral Processing in Mouse Inferior Colliculus

Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Week 5. The peripheral auditory system: The ear as a signal processor

AUDL GS08/GAV1 Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Pitch & Binaural listening

The Effects of Hearing Loss on Binaural Function

Development of Sound Localization 2. How do the neural mechanisms subserving sound localization develop?

Neural Correlates and Mechanisms of Spatial Release From Masking: Single-Unit and Population Responses in the Inferior Colliculus

Central Auditory System Basics and the Effects of Abnormal Auditory Input to the Brain. Amanda M. Lauer, Ph.D. July 3,

to vibrate the fluid. The ossicles amplify the pressure. The surface area of the oval window is

Modeling Physiological and Psychophysical Responses to Precedence Effect Stimuli

Neuroethology in Neuroscience or Why study an exotic animal

Before we talk about the auditory system we will talk about the sound and waves

The Coding of Spatial Location by Single Units in the Lateral Superior Olive of the Cat. I. Spatial Receptive Fields in Azimuth

Otoconia: Calcium carbonate crystals Gelatinous mass. Cilia. Hair cells. Vestibular nerve. Vestibular ganglion

Study of sound localization by owls and its relevance to humans

Adaptation of Binaural Processing in the Adult Brainstem Induced by Ambient Noise

Organization. The physics of sound. Measuring sound intensity. Fourier analysis. (c) S-C. Liu, Inst of Neuroinformatics 1

SPECIAL SENSES: THE AUDITORY SYSTEM

Lauer et al Olivocochlear efferents. Amanda M. Lauer, Ph.D. Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS

Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences in the Medial Superior Olive of a Small Mammal, the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat

PSY 215 Lecture 10 Topic: Hearing Chapter 7, pages

An Auditory System Modeling in Sound Source Localization

Physiological measures of the precedence effect and spatial release from masking in the cat inferior colliculus.

Systems Neuroscience Oct. 16, Auditory system. http:

Structure and Function of the Auditory and Vestibular Systems (Fall 2014) Auditory Cortex (3) Prof. Xiaoqin Wang

A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing

A THREE-CHANNEL MODEL OF HUMAN BINAURAL SOUND LOCALIZATION. Rachel Neville Dingle. Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia March 2012

Sound localization psychophysics

How is the stimulus represented in the nervous system?

Binaural Hearing for Robots Introduction to Robot Hearing

The role of spatial cues for processing speech in noise

Binaurally-coherent jitter improves neural and perceptual ITD sensitivity in normal and electric hearing

CODING OF AUDITORY SPACE

Binaural Hearing. Why two ears? Definitions

Temporal and Binaural Properties in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus and Its Output Tract

THE NEURAL CODING OF AUDITORY SPACE BY TERRY T. TAKAHASHI

Intracellular Recordings in Response to Monaural and Binaural Stimulation of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Cat

Tolerance to Sound Intensity of Binaural Coincidence Detection in the Nucleus Laminaris of the Owl

Temporal coding in the auditory brainstem of the barn owl

Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus. Amanda M. Lauer, Ph.D. Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS

Modeling and Simulation of the Auditory Pathway

HEARING. Structure and Function

A dendritic model of coincidence detection in the avian brainstem

Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus September 14, 2005

Neural Responses in the Inferior Colliculus to Binaural Masking Level Differences Created by Inverting the Noise in One Ear

The speed at which it travels is a function of the density of the conducting medium.

Sound and Hearing. Decibels. Frequency Coding & Localization 1. Everything is vibration. The universe is made of waves.

Receptors / physiology

Week 5. Fall 2016 Part 2: Structure and Function of Auditory System 1

Structure and Function of the Auditory and Vestibular Systems (Fall 2014) Auditory Cortex (1) Prof. Xiaoqin Wang

Models of Plasticity in Spatial Auditory Processing

Innervation of the Cochlea. Reading: Yost Ch. 8

Theme 2: Cellular mechanisms in the Cochlear Nucleus

ABSTRACT. Figure 1. Stimulus configurations used in discrimination studies of the precedence effect.

Medial Superior Olive in the Free-Tailed Bat: Response to Pure Tones and Amplitude-Modulated Tones

Auditory Physiology Richard M. Costanzo, Ph.D.

Neural Recording Methods

Hearing II Perceptual Aspects

Sensory Systems Vision, Audition, Somatosensation, Gustation, & Olfaction

Chapter 11: Sound, The Auditory System, and Pitch Perception

CNS pathways. topics. The auditory nerve, and the cochlear nuclei of the hindbrain

Hearing. istockphoto/thinkstock

Publication VI. c 2007 Audio Engineering Society. Reprinted with permission.

Auditory and Vestibular Systems

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive. Yi Zhou, 1 Laurel H. Carney, 2 and H. Steven Colburn 1 1

BCS 221: Auditory Perception BCS 521 & PSY 221

Νευροφυσιολογία και Αισθήσεις

THE COCHLEA AND AUDITORY PATHWAY

Receptors and Synapses in the MSO

A developmental learning rule for coincidence. tuning in the barn owl auditory system. Wulfram Gerstner, Richard Kempter J.

Descending Control of Responses in the Auditory Midbrain

Neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants: Effects of auditory experience

What is the effect on the hair cell if the stereocilia are bent away from the kinocilium?

Auditory System & Hearing

Processing of Interaural Intensity Differences in the LSO: Role of Interaural Threshold Differences

Spectrograms (revisited)

Auditory System Feedback

Steadman, Mark (2015) Investigating the neural code for dynamic speech and the effect of signal degradation. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.

Transcription:

Processing in The Superior Olivary Complex Alan R. Palmer Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK Binaural cues for Localising Sounds in Space time Interaural Time Differences (ITDs) Interaural Level Differences (ILDs) Binaural Mechanisms of Sound Localization Interaural time (or phase) difference at low frequency are initially analysed in the MSO by coincidence detectors connected by a delay line system. Interaural level differences at high frequency are initially analysed in the LSO by input that is inhibitory from one ear and excitatory from the other. 1

The Auditory Nervous System Cortex Cortex MGB Excitatory GABAergic IC Glycinergic Interaural Level Differences DNLL Medial Geniculate Body Inferior Colliculus Nuclei of the Lateral Lemniscus Cochlear Nucleus DCN PVCN AVCN Cochlea MSO MNTB Superior Olive Lateral Interaural Lemniscus Time Differences Lateral Superior Olive Medial Superior Olive Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body Binaural Hearing The ability to extract specific forms of auditory information using two ears, that would not be possible using one ear only. 2

Advantages of Two Ears Improved detection / increased loudness Removing interference from echoes Improved detection of sounds in interfering backgrounds Spatial localization Detection of auditory motion 20 db 700 μs Nordlund Interaural level differences (high frequency) 3

PARALLEL PROCESSING OF INFORMATION IN THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS To medial superior olive: information about sound localisation using timing (and possibly time coding of speech) To inferior colliculus: information about pinna sound transformations To lateral superior olive: information about sound localisation using interaural intensity To medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: information about sound localisation using interaural intensity Either commisural or to inferior colliculus information about sound level and voice pitch To inferior colliculus: information about complex sounds (possibly place coding of speech) Input from cochlear nerve Interaural Level Difference Pathway Excitatory Inhibitory + + _ + + 4

Ipsilateral Contralateral Sound lev vel (db SPL) 100 100 20 20 0.125 32 0.125 32 Frequency (khz) Caird and Klinke 1983 5

Caspary and Finlayson (1991) Irvine (1986) Interaural time differences (low frequency) The discharges of cochlear nerve fibres to low- frequency sounds are not random; they occur at particular times (phase locking). Evans (1975) 6

PARALLEL PROCESSING OF INFORMATION IN THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS To medial superior olive: information about sound localisation using timing (and possibly time coding of speech) To inferior colliculus: information about pinna sound transformations To lateral superior olive: information about sound localisation using interaural intensity To medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: information about sound localisation using interaural intensity Either commisural or to inferior colliculus information about sound level and voice pitch To inferior colliculus: information about complex sounds (possibly place coding of speech) Input from cochlear nerve Interaural Time Difference Pathway The coincidence detection model of Jeffress (1948) is the widely accepted model for low-frequency sound localisation Response 0 Interaural Time Difference 7

Response 0 Interaural Time Difference ALT TAB Department of Neurophysiology,University of Wisconsin Ipsilateral Contralateral Barn Owl: Konishi et al 1988 8

Semicircular Canals Window Pena et al 2001 Matches between the inputs from the two ears in the Barn Owl Nucleus Laminaris Fischer and Pena 2009 Pathways for analysing interaural time differences To inferior colliculus Excitatory Left Ear + Cochlear Nucleus Cochlear Nucleus + + + Right Ear MSO Large calyx synaptic ending 9

Semicircular Can als Window Se mi cir cul ar Canals Window Se mi cir cul ar Canals Window 0 μs Time Delay 0 μs Left Ear Cochlear Nucleus Cochlear Nucleus Right Ear MSO Large calyx synaptic ending Auditory Nerve Activity 0 μs Time Delay Arrives at left ear 300 μs later than at the right 300 μs Left Ear Cochlear Nucleus Cochlear Nucleus Right Ear MSO Large calyx synaptic ending Auditory Nerve Activity 300 μs Time Delay Coincident spikes 0 μs Time Delay Arrives at left ear 300 μs later than at the right 300 μs 0 μs Left Ear Cochlear Nucleus Cochlear Nucleus Right Ear MSO Large calyx synaptic ending Auditory Nerve Activity 300 μs Time Delay 0 μs Time Delay Coincident spikes 10

-600-300 0 300 600 ITD (μs) Interaural Phase Sensitivity in the MSO Best Delay 1 ms 1 ms Yin and Chan (1988) Smith et al 1993 11

Bekius et al 1999 Noise BF tones Guinea Pig Palmer et al., 1990 Cat Yin et al., 1986 Palmer et al 1990 Distribution of peaks of ITD functions in response to interaurally-delayed noise Physiological range 80 rones Number of Neur 60 40 20 0-500 0 500 1000 Interaural Delays (μs) McAlpine Jiang and Palmer 2001 12

McAlpine, Jiang and Palmer 1996 1/8 1/4 1/2 cycle 1/16 McAlpine Jiang and Palmer 2001 Brand et al 2002 13

Grothe 2003 Brand et al., 2002 325 Hz 500 Hz ed Response Normalis -1000-500 0 500 1000 ITD (μs) 700 Hz 1.0 khz 1.4 khz -1000-500 0 500 1000 ITD (μs) -1000-500 0 500 1000 McAlpine Jiang and Palmer 2001 ITD (μs) 14

Distribution of steepest slopes of ITD functions in response to interaurally-delayed noise Physiological range 80 urones Number of Ne 60 40 20 0-500 0 500 1000 Interaural Delays (μs) McAlpine Jiang and Palmer 2001 ormalised Response N 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0-1000 -500 0 500 1000 Interaural Time Difference (μs) aural Time Difference (μs) Intera 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 Frequency (khz) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Interaural Phase Difference (cycles) McAlpine Jiang and Palmer 2001 ITD processing is BF-dependent. ITD functions are steepest around midline. The consequence of this is that: As ITD increases across the physiological range the activity at any frequency increases 15

Descending pathways Spangler and Warr 1991 Warr 1978, Warr and Guinan 1979 16

Spoendlin 1971 Wiederhold and Kiang 1971 Function of the descending or centrifugal innervation Protection from acoustic trauma Control of the mechanical state of the cochlea Control of the mechanical state of the cochlea Involvement in selective attention Detection of complex signal in noise 17