USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Similar documents
FSIS Salmonella Update

Food Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~

FSIS DIRECTIVE

Expert Elicitation on the Relative Risks of Processed Meat and Poultry Products

Use of Microbiological Testing and Microbiological Criteria in Regulatory Programs for Meat, Poultry, and Processed Egg Products

Food Safety and Inspection Service Research Priorities

Introduction. Future U.S. initiatives regarding the food safety for fresh produce. FoodNet Partners. FoodNet Partners

Food Safety Issues Among Small and Very Small Processors

The Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention

Recent Regulatory Changes for Meat & Poultry Labeling

FSIS Performance Standards for Chicken Parts and Comminuted Poultry

LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP. Food Recall Process. Cecilia M. Wolyniak Food and Drug Administration Office of Enforcement

Continuous Food Safety Innovation as a Management Strategy: Public Perspective

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

Food Commissaries under FSMA and the US FDA model Food Code

USDA s New Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli Policy. James Hodges Executive Vice President American Meat Institute

Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat and Poultry Products

Food Purchasing & Receiving Review

Regulatory requirements associated with the safe production of RTE products.

Industry Uses of Microbiological Criteria and Testing for Raw Food Products. R. B. Tompkin Food Safety Consultant

Alignment of FSMA with Existing Food Safety Programs International Citrus & Beverage Conference

The Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Meats

2017 FDA Food Code. FDA/CFSAN Retail Food Policy Team

Food Safety Risk Management

Food Grade Information

Availability of FSIS Compliance Guidelines for Allergens and. Ingredients of Public Health Concern: Identification, Prevention

Implementing FSMA: CDC s Surveillance Provisions

Effective use of performance criteria for individual plants

Food2Market South Carolina Food Regulations and Food Safety Education for Food Entrepreneurs. Food2Market. The Idea

Simplified Modeling Framework for Microbial Food-Safety Risk Assessments

Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on Microbiological Criteria for Foodstuffs Information for Manufacturers/Processors

Prepared by Wake County Environmental Services, Environmental Health & Safety Division

Guidance for Reduced Oxygen Packaging

Why all the Attention to Food Safety?

2009 FDA Food Code Supplement for the ServSafe Fifth Edition

...what you need to know

Food Safety Performance Standards: an Epidemiologic Perspective

Inter-Agency Overlap and Jurisdictional Boundaries

Food Safety Federal Efforts to Protect Public Health

FDA Foodborne Illness Risk Factor Study Data Collection Form

Regulatory Organization Pending Changes Federal Legislation New Listeria regulations Prospects for improved food safety

American Fats and Oils Association Animal Protein Forum, October 9, 2013

Microbial Problems, Causes, and Solutions in Meat and Poultry Processing Operations. Helen G. Brown, PhD Research Specialist Tyson Foods, Inc

October 2018 Important Update: MUST READ

Victoria Salin, Senarath Darmasena, Alex Wong, and Ping Luo Texas A&M University Contact:

Sanitary Conditions Overview

Food Safety and Inspection Service: Labeling Guideline on Documentation Needed to Substantiate Animal Raising Claims for Label Submission

Final Rules Preventive Controls for Human Food Preventive Controls for Animal Food

21 Oct F. Kasuga

New publications in Food Microbiology : EN and ISO* standards, FDA-BAM, USDA/FSIS since Nov Reference Progress Scope.

July 11, Dear Mr. Derfler:

Inspection Report Item 29: Compliance with Variance, Specialized Process, Reduced Oxygen Packaging Criteria, and HACCP Plan

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Salmonella. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

Susan Isberg Investigator US Department of Agriculture Office of Investigation, Enforcement and Audit April 2016

FOOD SAFETY. USDA Should Take Further Action to Reduce Pathogens in Meat and Poultry Products

Responding to a Food Recall

From Farm to Fork: Practical Applications for Food Composition Data. Catherine E. Woteki, Ph.D., R.D. Dean of Agriculture Iowa State University

Laboratories & Consulting Group

Purpose of this Document

REVISED CODEX GENERAL STANDARD FOR IRRADIATED FOODS CODEX STAN , REV

Concern over food safety puts focus on pathogens

7th Edition FDA Food Code updates. SERVSAFE Manager. Includes. 7th Edition ES S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3600 Chicago, IL

U.S. National Residue Program for Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products - Update

MONBEEF PTY LTD ESTABLISHMENT 0952 HACCP, E. COLI O157:H7, SRM and ANIMAL WELFARE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Food Safety in Older Adults: Disease Prevention Strategies and Educational Resources. Adam Ghering Public Affairs Specialist USDA - FSIS

Checklist of issues to be considered by food business operators when implementing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005

Implementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry

Foodborne Outbreak Linked to Pork Consumption. Jennifer Koeman, DVM, MSc, MPH, DACVPM National Pork Board

FDA Sampling Guidance and Practices. Terri McConnell FDA/ORA/Office of Regulatory Science

Reduced Oxygen Packaging in the 2013 US FDA Food Code. Brian A. Nummer, Ph.D. Reduced Oxygen Packaging (ROP) is considered a.

Listeria monocytogenes in Food Plants with emphasis on Cold-Smoked Salmon Plants & Dairies. Presented by Rebecca Robertson January 19, 2009

The Division of Food, Drug and Radiation Safety (DFDRS)

A Guide to Food Hygiene Regulations in the UK

CFSAN Update Michael M. Landa

FSIS Policy Update. Daniel L. Engeljohn, PhD Assistant Administrator Office of Policy and Program Development FSIS, USDA

International 59th Meat Conference in Serbia Better food Better life

APPENDIX A - Potentially Hazardous Foods

CODEX and the European Union s food safety policy

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Outbreak Alert! Trends in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks in the United States ( )

Listeria monocytogenes Risk Assessment: Executive Summary

Curing as a Single Special Process Regulatory Agency Jurisdiction NAME (fill in form)

COURSE BOOK FOOD SAFETY ON THE GO MODULE 4: FOOD SERVICE WORKERS (STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS) 2012 EDITION

Safety & Sanitation. In your Kitchen. Presented by: Alex Shortsleeve, MBA

ARE YOU READY FOR RETAIL?

GCC Guide for Control on Imported Foods

Case 1:14-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Animal Industry Report

State of the Plate. Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health

Welcome to the PulseNet/OutbreakNet East Coast Regional Meeting

VIOLATIONS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS

Food Contamination and Spoilage Food Safety: Managing with the HACCP System Second Edition (245TXT or 245CIN)

E-Beam Processing. Irradiation in The United States of Fresh Produce and Perishables Sadex Corporation September 2, 2009

FOODBORNE DISEASES. Why learning foodborne diseases is very important? What do you know about foodborne diseases? What do you want to know more?

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES

Food Safety and Inspection Service: Food Safety and Inspection Service Click to edit Master title style

Advance copy of document submitted to Office Federal Register. May be subject to minor changes.

FDA RELEASES FOOD CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE MODERNIZATION REPORT

Submitted via

CDC Update Laura G. Brown, Ph.D. National Center for Environmental Health

Transcription:

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection John M. Hicks, Jr., DVM, MPH Office of Policy and Program Development Food Safety Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 1

Descriptive Designation for Needleor blade-tenderized (Mechanically Tenderized) Beef Products (FSIS Proposes New Labeling Rules for Mechanically Tenderized Beef Products) 2

Descriptive Designation for Needle or Blade Tenderized (Mechanically Tenderized) Beef Products On June 10, 2013, FSIS published in the Federal Register (FRN# 2008-0017) the proposed rule, Descriptive Designation for Needle- or blade-tenderized (Mechanically Tenderized) Beef Products. The Agency is proposing to require the use of the descriptive designation "mechanically tenderized" on the labels of raw or partially cooked needle or blade tenderized beef products, including beef products injected with marinade or solution, unless such products are destined to be fully cooked at an official establishment. 3

Descriptive Designation for Needle or Blade Tenderized (Mechanically Tenderized) Beef Products FSIS is proposing that the product name for such beef products include the descriptive designation "mechanically tenderized" and accurate description of the beef component. FSIS is also proposing to require that labels of raw and partially cooked needle or blade tenderized beef products destined for household consumers, hotels, restaurants, or similar institutions include validated cooking instructions that: inform consumers that these products need to be cooked to a specified minimum internal temperature, and whether they need to be held at that minimum internal temperature for a specified time before consumption, i.e., dwell 4 time or rest time, to ensure that they are thoroughly cooked.

Descriptive Designation for Needle or Blade Tenderized (Mechanically Tenderized) Beef Products Update On August 9, 2013, FSIS announced that it is extending the comment period for this proposed rule until October 8, 2013. The Agency is taking this action in response to two requests made by trade associations for additional time to comment on the proposed rule and the guidance. FSIS is also announcing that it has posted on its website FSIS Compliance Guideline for Validating Cooking Instructions for Mechanically Tenderized Beef 5 Products, 2013

Descriptive Designation for Needle or Blade Tenderized (Mechanically Tenderized) Beef Products Update The Agency has posted this guidance on FSIS Significant Guidance Documents web page. FSIS is requesting comments specifically for additional scientifically valid data on cooking instructions developed for various mechanically tenderized beef products that have been found to consistently meet an endpoint temperature and rest time sufficient to ensure the product is fully cooked. 6

Availability of Guidance: Establishment Guidance for the Selection of a Commercial or Private Microbiological Testing Laboratory 7

Availability of Guidance: Establishments Guidance for the Selection of a Commercial or Private Microbiological Testing Laboratory On June 27, 2013, FSIS announced the availability of final guidance for federally inspected establishments in the selection of commercial and private microbiological testing laboratories. FSIS has posted this policy guidance on its Web page. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulatorycompliance/compliance-guides-index. FSIS is encouraging establishments that prepare meat, poultry, or processed egg products to consider the criteria in this guidance in selecting commercial or private microbiological testing laboratories and in determining the laboratories' capability to provide accurate and reliable results. 8

Availability of Guidance: Establishments Guidance for the Selection of a Commercial or Private Microbiological Testing Laboratory FSIS-regulated establishments may perform microbiological testing (or contract with an outside laboratory) for various reasons, including, but not limited to the following: To fulfill regulatory requirements (9 CFR 310.25, 381.94, 430.4, 590.580); To support on-going verification of the establishment s HACCP plan (9 CFR 417.4(a)(2); To support decisions made in the establishment s hazard analysis ( 9 CFR 417.5(a)(1) and 417.5(a)(2); To evaluate the effectiveness of the establishment s sanitation program (9 CFR 416.14); or To comply with customers purchase specifications or requirements. 9

Availability of Guidance: Establishments Guidance for the Selection of a Commercial or Private Microbiological Testing Laboratory Establishments that select laboratories that do not apply appropriate testing methods or maintain effective Quality Control or Quality Assurance (QC/QA) practices may not receive reliable or useful test results and thus run the risk of not being aware that the food that they have produced is unsafe. In response to comments received, FSIS has revised the guidance to clarify that establishments that select laboratories that meet the guidance provided in the ISO 17025 accreditation schemes would meet the applicable criteria set out in FSIS's guidance. 10

Availability of Guidance: Establishments Guidance for the Selection of a Commercial or Private Microbiological Testing Laboratory FSIS also revised this guidance to explain that establishments that have samples analyzed using an accredited laboratory and an FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) method would meet the applicable criteria recommended in this guidance. FSIS also revised this guidance to state that proficiency testing (PT) should be performed on a regular basis. 11

Availability of Guidance: Establishments Guidance for the Selection of a Commercial or Private Microbiological Testing Laboratory FSIS has made available a web-based list of validated methods commonly used by regulated establishments to test for relevant foodborne pathogens (i.e., E. coli O157:H7; Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria species; and Salmonella and Campylobacter species) in meat, poultry, and processed egg products. The list of these methods is available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulatory -compliance/new+technologies. 12

QUESTIONS 13