Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 4, 2018 Report Length: 14 Pages

Similar documents
Clinical Review Report (Sample)

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: REFERENCE LIST Side Effect Free Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Effectiveness

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 21, 2019 Report Length: 5 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 30, 2018 Report Length: 7 Pages

TITLE: Delivery of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Non-Hospital Settings: A Review of the Safety and Guidelines

Increasing Frequency of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Strips During Pregnancy: A Review of the Clinical and Cost- Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: June 12, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: March 5, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 09, 2018 Report Length: 7 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

DATE: 17 July 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: August 30, 2018 Report Length: 11 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

CADTH Therapeutic Review

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

TITLE: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Adults with Mental Illness: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Benzydamine for Acute Sore Throat: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Injury Transfers: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Guidelines

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback Devices for Adult Patients in Cardiac Arrest: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

DATE: 04 April 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

TITLE: Montelukast for Sleep Apnea: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, and Guidelines

TITLE: Diagnosing, Screening, and Monitoring Depression in the Elderly: A Review of Guidelines

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

TITLE: Mattresses for Chronic Back or Neck Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

A critical appraisal of: Canadian guideline fysisk aktivitet using the AGREE II Instrument

TITLE: Immediate Osseointegrated Implants for Cancer Patients: A Review of Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 2.0 Publication Date: November 29, 2018 Report Length: 20 Pages

Health Interventions in Ambulatory Cancer Care Centres DRAFT. Objectives. Methods

DATE: 28 May 2015 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Orthodontic Treatment for the Management of Pain or Impacted Teeth in Patients with Malocclusion: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

BRAF Targeted Therapy for Patients with Melanoma and Active Brain Metastases: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness

TITLE: Optimal Oxygen Saturation Range for Adults Suffering from Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Patient Benefit, Harms, and Guidelines

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Nabilone for Chronic Pain Management: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

DATE: 22 May 2013 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: February 15, 2017 Report Length: 15 Pages

Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) Questions and Answers for Health Care Providers

TITLE: Use of Bupropion in Patients with Depression and the Associated Risk of Seizures: Safety

TITLE: Newborn Eye Prophylaxis: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

This report will provide a review on the comparative clinical effectiveness and safety between intranasal triamcinolone and beclomethasone.

TITLE: Dicyclomine for Gastrointestinal Conditions: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Guidelines

DATE: 15 April 2016 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

TITLE: Antimicrobial Ointments for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines

TITLE: Long-term Use of Acamprosate Calcium for Alcoholism: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Guidelines

CADTH HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Screening for Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review

2017/2018 Annual Volunteer Tuberculosis Notice

TITLE: Discontinuation of Benzodiazepines and Other Sedative-Hypnotic Sleep Medication in Hospitalized Patients: Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment Programs for Substance Use Disorder: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 18, 2017 Report Length: 20 Pages

TITLE: Crushed Buprenorphine or Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependency: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

DATE: 09 December 2009 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES:

TITLE: Optimal Care of Chronic, Non-Healing, Lower Extremity Wounds: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

TITLE: Shilla and MAGEC Systems for Growing Children with Scoliosis: A Review of the Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness

TITLE: Probenecid Dosing When Given with Cefazolin: Guidelines and Clinical Effectiveness

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Tuberculosis Screening Protocol For Use In Marin County School Settings

CADTH Optimal Use Report

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

DATE: 10 February 2016 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Behaviour Modification for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Resulting from Neurogenic Bladder: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Long-acting Opioids for Chronic Non-cancer Pain: A Review of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 3, 2018 Report Length: 23 Pages

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

Interferon Gamma Release Assay Testing for Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Physician Guidelines

Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: What s the difference?

TB is Global. Latent TB Infection (LTBI) Sharing the Care: Working Together. September 24, 2014

COMPUS OPTIMAL THERAPY REPORT. Supporting Informed Decisions. À l appui des décisions éclairées

Peggy Leslie-Smith, RN

A Mobile Health Intervention Utilizing Community Partnership to Improve Access to Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment

DATE: 29 Aug 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

TITLE: Abuse and Misuse Potential of Dimenhydrinate: A Review of the Clinical Evidence

TITLE: Physical Therapy Treatments for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: A Review of Guidelines. DATE: 10 November 2016 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Title: Scoop Stretcher for Restriction of Spinal Motion: Clinical Effectiveness

COMPUS OPTIMAL THERAPY REPORT. Supporting Informed Decisions. À l appui des décisions éclairées. Proton Pump Inhibitor Project Overview: Summaries

COMPUS Vol 2, Issue 8 December 2008

TITLE: Acetylsalicylic Acid for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Review of Clinical Evidence, Benefits and Harms

CADTH TECHNOLOGY REVIEW Community Water Fluoridation Programs: A Health Technology Assessment Review of Dental Caries and Other Health Outcomes

Health Interventions in Ambulatory Cancer Care Centres

DENOMINATOR: All patients aged 18 and older with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease

TITLE: Fusidic Acid for Ophthalmic Infections: A Review of Clinical and Cost Effectiveness and Safety

AFMC Student Portal Immunization and Testing Guidelines

Effect of Topical Anesthetics on Vaccine: A Focused Practice Question

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

TITLE: Stepwise Approach for the Prescription of Opiates for Non-Cancer Pain: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

Latent Tuberculosis Infection Reporting Instructions for Civil Surgeons Using CalREDIE Provider Portal

COFM Immunization Policy 2016

DATE: 22 June 2015 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

LTBI: Who to Test & When to Treat

Tuberculosis Screening and Targeted Testing of College and University Students: Developing a Best Practice Approach:

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 04, 2018 Report Length: 47 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: September 05, 2018 Report Length: 49 Pages

Detection and Treatment of Tuberculosis in Correctional Facilities: Opportunities and Challenges

Guideline Development At WHO

TITLE: Changing Total Parenteral Nutrition Tubes in Pediatric in-hospital Patients: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Insulin Pens in Acute Care Settings: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Diagnosis Latent Tuberculosis. Disclosures. Case

Clinical Guidelines appraised with the AGREE instrument

Let s Talk TB A Series on Tuberculosis, A Disease That Affects Over 2 Million Indians Every Year

TITLE: Australian Sheepskins for the Management of Pressure Ulcers: A Review of the Clinical-Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Transcription:

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Review of Clinical Utility and Guidelines Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 4, 2018 Report Length: 14 Pages

Authors: Ron Pohar, Lorna Adcock Cite As: Chest x-rays around placement in long-term care facilities: clinical utility and guidelines. Ottawa: CADTH; 2018 Apr. (CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal). ISSN: 1922-8147 (online) Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document. The views and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of CADTH. CADTH is not responsible for any errors, omissions, injury, loss, or damage arising from or relating to the use (or misuse) of any information, statements, or conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials. This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is governed by the third-party website owners own terms and conditions set out for such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any information contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible for any injury, loss, or damage suffered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH has no responsibility for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by third-party sites. Subject to the aforementioned limitations, the views expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the views of Canada s federal, provincial, or territorial governments or any third party supplier of information. This document is prepared and intended for use in the context of the Canadian health care system. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at the user s own risk. This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising from or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario, Canada. The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors. About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-for-profit organization responsible for providing Canada s health care decision-makers with objective evidence to help make informed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical devices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care system. Funding: CADTH receives funding from Canada s federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec. SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 2

Abbreviations IGRA interferon gamma release assay LTC long-term care LTBI latent tuberculosis infection TB tuberculosis TST tuberculin skin test Context and Policy Issues In 2010, the rate of tuberculosis (TB) fell to 4.6 per 100,000 population in Canada, which was an all-time low, with 1,577 cases being reported. 1 While the rate of TB has continued to decrease in Canada over time, some groups of the population have higher rates of infection than others, one of which is older adults. 1 For example, in 2010, when looking at rates according to age and sex, males over the age of 75 had the one of the highest TB rates at 13.6 per 100,000 population. 1 Those who reside in long-term care facilities are generally considered to have the same risk of TB as community-dwelling populations, except for those that belong to at-risk groups, in particular elderly males. 1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the bacteria that causes TB infection. 1 Following infection, approximately 5% of individuals will develop early primary disease, however, the majority of individuals will not display symptoms of infection but will develop a latent TB infection (LTBI) in which the bacteria remain in dormant state in the lungs which can be reactivated and become active disease in the future. 1 Approximately, 90% of those infected with TB will develop a latent TB infection (LTBI) that is not reactivated, and approximately 5% will experience a reactivation of a LTBI (if the LTBI is not identified and left untreated). 1 Most TB cases that are identified in the Canadian population are considered to be reactivations that occur between 18 and 24 months following the initial infection. 1 Screening for LTBI may be used to identify people who are at risk of reactivation due to associated conditions such as compromised immunity 1,2 and would therefore benefit from treatment. 1 Chest radiography (i.e., a chest x-ray) can be used to identify lesions in the lung, referred to as Ghon focus (a calcified granuloma in the lung) that occur with an initial, active TB infection. Other screening tests, such as the tuberculin skin test (TST) and the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) may be used to detect LTBI. However, a positive screening test for LTBI may still require follow-up with a chest x-ray rule out subclinical active TB since TST and IGRAs do not distinguish between LTBI and active TB disease. 1 Moreover, TST may be difficult to interpret in older adults due to immune suppression. 1 Thus, a two stage test may be used in this population. 1 SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 3

Because older adults are at higher risk for TB, a chest x-ray is required prior to placement in long-term care in some provinces and jurisdictions to identify individuals with potential active TB disease so that they can be appropriately treated prior to admission when feasible. 1 However, this requirement does not appear to be universal. This report will review the evidence, if identified, in which the clinical utility of chest x-rays for the assessment of illness (e.g., TB or other respiratory illness such as pneumonia) in adults prior to placement in long-term care facilities was evaluated. As well, guidelines pertaining to the use of assessments for illness in adults, including chest x-rays and other medical assessments, prior to being placed in long-term care facilities will be summarized and reviewed. Research Questions 1. What is the clinical utility of chest x-rays for the assessment of illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities? 2. What are the evidence-based guidelines associated with assessments for illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities? Key Findings No evidence that evaluated the clinical utility of chest x-rays for the assessment of illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities was identified. One evidence-based guideline from the Public Health Agency of Canada was identified that met the inclusion criteria for the report. It is recommended that adults over the age of 65 from certain higher risk groups receive chest x-rays prior to admission to long-term care to screen for active tuberculosis and that individuals aged 65 and under from those higher risk group be screened for latent tuberculosis infection with a two-step tuberculin skin test. However, the level of evidence and strength of recommendation was not included for these recommendations. Methods Literature Search Methods A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases and a focused Internet search. No methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval by publication type. The search was limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2007 and March 6, 2018. Selection Criteria and Methods One reviewer screened citations and selected studies. In the first level of screening, titles and abstracts were reviewed and potentially relevant articles were retrieved and assessed for inclusion. The final selection of full-text articles was based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 1. SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 4

Table 1: Selection Criteria Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes Study Designs Adults being assessed prior to placement in residential (group) care/long-term care facilities or having been placed in a residential (group) care/long-term care facilities. Q1: Chest x-ray as an assessment for illness (e.g., but not limited to tuberculosis, pneumonia) Q2: Chest x-ray or other medical assessments prior to entering a long term care facility Q1: Other medical exams to assess illness (for tuberculosis and other illnesses); No x-ray; No assessment; Q2: No comparator Q1: Clinical utility (e.g., but not limited to, infection to other patients, infection control, tracking patient baseline tuberculosis) Q2: Guidelines (e.g., are there any other assessments/practices in place for medical illness assessment prior to entering these types of facilities, timing of test [chest x-ray or other medical assessments] prior to placement) Health technology assessments (HTA), systematic reviews (SR), meta-analyses (MA), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-rcts. Exclusion Criteria Articles were excluded if they did not meet the selection criteria outlined in Table 1, they were duplicate publications, or were published prior to 2007. Guidelines with unclear methodology were also excluded. Critical Appraisal of Individual Studies The included guidelines were assessed with the AGREE II instrument. 3 Summary scores were not calculated for the included studies; rather, a review of the strengths and limitations of the guideline was described narratively. Summary of Evidence Quantity of Research Available A total of 281 citations were identified in the literature search. Following screening of titles and abstracts, 260 citations were excluded and 21 potentially relevant reports from the electronic search were retrieved for full-text review. Five potentially relevant publications were retrieved from the grey literature search. Of these potentially relevant articles, 25 publications were excluded for various reasons, and one publication met the inclusion criteria and was included in this report. This was one evidence-based guideline. Appendix 1 presents the PRISMA flowchart of the study selection. Additional references of potential interest are provided in Appendix 5. Summary of Study Characteristics Details of the included guideline characteristics are found in Appendix 2, Table 2. Study Design One guideline was included from the Public Health Agency of Canada. 1 The target users were public health and clinical professionals and it addressed a wide range of topics related SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 5

to TB including screening, contact management, and treatment of active and latent infections. Minimal information was provided with respect to the guideline development process although it was stated that recommendations were based on review of the literature and the quality of evidence was rated. 1 The approach to recommendation formulation was not reported. 1 Country of Origin The included guideline was developed in Canada and intended to apply to the Canadian population. 1 Patient Population The included guideline made recommendations specific to individuals who were preparing to move into LTC facilities. 1 Interventions and Comparators The included guideline made recommendations regarding the use of chest x-rays and TST prior to admission to LTC facilities. 1 Numerous other recommendations were made, but were not relevant to this report. Summary of Critical Appraisal Additional details regarding the strengths and limitations of the included publication are provided in Appendix 3, Table 3. The included guideline reported minimal details about the methodology used in its development. While it is stated that the literature was identified through review and then synthesized to make recommendations, no details were provided about those processes. While the rating system for the included literature and the strength of recommendations is presented, no details are provided for the processes used to arrive at those ratings. Further, the strength of recommendation was not applied to all recommendations. This is particularly important because the recommendations relevant to this report were among those that were not rated. As such the quality of the evidence to support the recommendation is unknown, as is the confidence of the guideline committee itself in the recommendations. 1 This makes it more challenging for decision makers to interpret the recommendations. Strengths of the included guideline were that the intended target users were clear and that the guideline development process included individuals from a broad range of disciplines, agencies, and expert bodies such as the Canadian Thoracic Society, Public Health Agency of Canada, Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Occupational Health Nurse, Medical Officer of Health, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Aboriginal Peoples' Health, and British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. 1 Summary of Findings 1. What is the clinical utility of chest x-rays for the assessment of illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities? No relevant literature was identified in the literature search. 2. What are the evidence-based guidelines associated with assessments for illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities? SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 6

Based on the included guideline, 1 chest x-rays are recommended prior to admission to LTC to screen for active TB only for those over the age of 65, as outlined in Appendix 4, Table 3. It is recommended that individuals aged 65 and under who are members of an risk group for LTBI undergo screening for LTBI with a two-step TST. 1 There were no associated strength of recommendations. It should be noted, however, that these recommendations appeared to be applicable only to identified populations who were higher risk populations as outlined Table 3 (e.g. Aboriginal Canadians residing in communities with high TB rates, people infected with HIV, the urban poor and individuals with chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis), not the entire Canadian population. The full list of identified populations can be found in Table 4. Limitations There was no literature identified that addressed the clinical utility of chest x-rays for the assessment of illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in LTC facilities. As such, there is an evidence gap for this question. One guideline was identified that addressed assessments for illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities. 1 While this was a Canadian guideline developed with consultation from a wide range of Canadian experts and reviewed externally, its methodology was unclear to some extent and the recommendations that were relevant to the questions in this report did not contain clear link to the evidence base and the strength of recommendation was not reported. As such, it remains unclear to some degree if the recommendations were based off of expert consensus or were supported by evidence from the literature. Only guidelines related to TB screening were identified. No guidelines related to other illnesses were identified. Conclusions and Implications for Decision or Policy Making There was no literature identified that addressed the clinical utility of chest x-rays for the assessment of illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in LTC facilities. As such, no conclusions can be made regarding this question. Given the evidence gap, this may be a question that should be addressed with future research. One guideline was identified that addressed assessments for illness in adults prior to being placed or having been placed in long-term care facilities. This guideline recommended that adults over the age of 65 from certain higher risk groups receive chest x-rays prior to admission to LTC to screen for active TB and that individuals aged 65 and under from those higher risk group be screened for LTBI with a two-step TST. 1 SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 7

References 1. Canadian tuberculosis standards [Internet]. 7th ed. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2014 Feb. [cited 2018 Mar 13]. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/aspc-phac/hp40-18-2014-eng.pdf 2. Richards MJ, Stuart RL. Principles of infection control in long-term care facilities. In: Post TW, editor. UpToDate [Internet]. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; 2017 Sep 26 [cited 2018 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/principles-of-infection-control-inlong-term-care-facilities Subscription required. 3. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ [Internet]. 2010 Dec;182(18):E839-E842. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3001530/pdf/182e839.pdf SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 8

Appendix 1: Selection of Included Studies 281 citations identified from electronic literature search and screened 260 citations excluded 21 potentially relevant articles retrieved for scrutiny (full text, if available) 5 potentially relevant reports retrieved from other sources (grey literature, hand search) 26 potentially relevant reports 25 reports excluded: -irrelevant population (4) -irrelevant intervention (3) -irrelevant comparator (0) -irrelevant outcomes (5) -other (review articles, editorials)(12) -withdrawn (1) 1 report included in review SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 9

Appendix 2: Characteristics of Included Publications Table 2: Characteristics of Included Guideline Intended Users, Target Population Intervention and Practice Considered Major Outcomes Considered Evidence Collection, Selection, and Synthesis Evidence Quality Assessment Recommendations Development and Evaluation Guideline Validation Public Health Agency of Canada, 2014 1 Public health and clinical professionals. Canadian population Screening for active TB and LBTI with chest x-rays and TST prior to admission to LTC facilities. The guideline was extensive and provided standards for screening for TB, contact management and treatment. A literature review was used to identify the body of evidence, but the methodology was unclear with respect to collection, selection and synthesis. The evidence was rated strong through very weak based upon the study design, consistency between study results and generalizability of the findings. The authors of each chapter reviewed all published evidence, particularly the most recent studies, and synthesized and rated this evidence. p.3 Some, but not all, recommendations were rated as strong or conditional based upon the balance between desirable effects and undesirable effects, and level of evidence. However, the method for arriving at the recommendation was not reported. The guideline was reviewed externally by a number of experts from different disciplines. LTC=Long-term care; LTBI=latent tuberculosis infection; TB=tuberculosis; TST=tuberculin skin test SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 10

Appendix 3: Critical Appraisal of Included Publications Table 3: Strengths and Limitations of Guidelines using AGREE II 3 Item Domain 1: Scope and Purpose 1. The overall objective(s) of the guideline is (are) specifically described. 2. The health question(s) covered by the guideline is (are) specifically described. 3. The population (patients, public, etc.) to whom the guideline is meant to apply is specifically described. Domain 2: Stakeholder Involvement 4. The guideline development group includes individuals from all relevant professional groups. 5. The views and preferences of the target population (patients, public, etc.) have been sought. Guideline Public Health Agency of Canada, 2014 1 The overall objective and purpose of the guideline is stated. The questions addressed in the guideline are not individually described. The population to whom the guideline is meant to apply is specifically described: to public health and clinical professionals, not individual patient management. Yes- Cross Canadian representation with many disciplines and agencies being included such as: Canadian Thoracic Society, Public Health Agency of Canada, Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Occupational Health Nurse, Medical Officer of Health, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Aboriginal Peoples' Health, and British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. Unclear 6. The target users of the guideline are clearly defined. Target users are clearly defined. The guideline is intended to provide information to public health and clinical professionals. Domain 3: Rigour of Development 7. Systematic methods were used to search for evidence. Stated that a literature was conducted but methods unclear. 8. The criteria for selecting the evidence are clearly described. Not described. 9. The strengths and limitations of the body of evidence are clearly described. 10. The methods for formulating the recommendations are clearly described. 11. The health benefits, side effects, and risks have been considered in formulating the recommendations. 12. There is an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence. 13. The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to its publication. Not described. Not described. Not described. 14. A procedure for updating the guideline is provided. Not described. Domain 4: Clarity of Presentation The evidence link is clear for some, but not all recommendations. Yes, the guideline was reviewed by experts. 15. The recommendations are specific and unambiguous. Some recommendations are clear but others are not as specific and refer back to other sections of the document which is cumbersome to follow. SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 11

Table 3: Strengths and Limitations of Guidelines using AGREE II 3 Item 16. The different options for management of the condition or health issue are clearly presented. Guideline Clear presentation for some recommendations but not necessarily for those relevant for this report as they refer back to other sections of the document. 17. Key recommendations are easily identifiable. Some key recommendations are easily identifiable but not necessarily for those relevant for this report as they refer back to other sections of the document. Domain 5: Applicability 18. The guideline describes facilitators and barriers to its application. 19. The guideline provides advice and/or tools on how the recommendations can be put into practice. 20. The potential resource implications of applying the recommendations have been considered. Not described. Not provided. Not considered 21. The guideline presents monitoring and/or auditing criteria. Not presented Domain 6: Editorial Independence 22. The views of the funding body have not influenced the content of the guideline. 23. Competing interests of guideline development group members have been recorded and addressed. Unclear. Competing interests have not been recorded. SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 12

Appendix 4: Main Study Findings and Authors Conclusions Table 4: Summary of Recommendations in Included Guidelines Recommendations Strength of Evidence and Recommendations Public Health Agency of Canada, 2014 1 Due to the decreasing utility of TST to diagnose LTBI after age 65 and the increasing risk of adverse effects from LTBI treatment in this age group, screening with a posterior-anterior and lateral chest x-ray for active TB is preferred upon admission for those over 65 years old. A baseline 2-step TST is still recommended upon admission for those 65 years old and under who also belong to an identified at-risk group. Detailed screening recommendations for both HCWs and residents in LTC facilities are provided in Table 6. p.391 Details from Table 6: Baseline posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiography on admission for people >65 years old from identified populations. p.398 Baseline two-step TST upon admission for identified population 65 years old. p.398 Annual TST not necessary. Facility risk assessment/local epidemiology should inform decision. p.398 Identified populations included the following (p.371): People with a history of active TB; Staff and residents of homeless shelters; The urban poor; Staff and inmates of correctional facilities and previously incarcerated people Injection drug users; Aboriginal Canadians residing in communities with high TB rates; People infected with HIV; People born in Canada and other low TB incidence countries prior to 1966; People born or previously residing in countries with a high TB incidence in Asia, Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America; People with high risk factors listed in Chapter 6, Table 1; HCWs serving at-risk groups High Risk Factors from Chapter 6, Table 1 (p. 127) Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome Human immunodeficiency virus infection Transplantation (related to immune-suppressant therapy) Silicosis Chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis Carcinoma of head and neck Recent TB infection (<2 years) Abnormal chest x-ray fibronodular disease Not reported for these recommendations. Identified populations were based on strong evidence. BCG=Bacillus Calmette Guérin; HCW=Health care workers; LTC=Long-term care; LTBI=latent tuberculosis infection; TB=tuberculosis; TST=tuberculin skin test SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 13

Appendix 5: Additional References of Potential Interest Guidelines with No Recommendations with Respect to Timing National Guideline Clearinghouse. Guideline summary: final recommendation statement: latent tuberculosis infection: screening. In: National Guideline Clearinghouse [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016 Sep [cited 2018 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.guideline.gov/summaries/summary/50475/finalrecommendation-statement-latent-tuberculosis-infectionscreening?q=tuberculosis+diagnosis Recommendations or Requirements without Methodology Presented Long-term care and retirement homes: recommendations for tuberculosis (TB) screening [Internet]. Windsor (ON): Health Unit, Windsor Essex County; 2017. [cited 2017 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.wechu.org/tuberculosis-tb-management/long-term-care-andretirement-homes-recommendations-tuberculosis-tb TB screening requirements for long term care/retirement home residents [Internet]. Waterloo (ON): Public Health and Emergency Services, Region of Waterloo; [n.d.]. [cited 2017 Dec 7]. Available from: http://chd.region.waterloo.on.ca/en/clinicsclassesfairs/resources/tbscreening_newltcr esidents.pdf Recommendations for tuberculosis (TB) screening in long term care and retirement homes [Internet]. Bellville (ON): Health Unit, Hastings & Prince Edward Counties; 2014 Jul. [cited 2017 Dec 7]. Available from: http://hpepublichealth.ca/sites/default/files/documents/forprofessionals/cdc_recommendationsfortbscreeninginltcandrhs.pdf SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Chest X-Rays Around Placement in Long-Term Care Facilities 14