EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF 15 N-LABELED FERTILIZERS ON MAIZE PLANT

Similar documents
PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES AND AMINO-ACIDS FERTILIZERS - PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS

INTRODUCTION TO GCiC

Amelia Agrochemical Products Available for Licensing PRODUCT LIST

MOSA: Stabilized Monosilicic Acid

WHAT ARE FERTILIZERS

AGNES KTS (0-0-25)+SO3 42% Liquid T.C. Ministry of Agriculture License No.: 588 / Registration No.: 14627

Effect of NPK and Humic Substance Applications on Vegetative Growth of Egazy Olive Seedlings

Stoller s Options and Timings for Increasing Tuber Numbers in Potatoes

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

Fertilizers with Protein Chelated Structures with Biostimulator Role

Liquid Fertilizers for Sports Turf Vitality

TNPSC Chemistry Study Material Fertilizers

Larry Stein, Texas A & M AgriLife Extension Service. Nitrogen fertilization materials, rates and timing

Professional Greenhouse Water Soluble Fertilizers

EconovaPlus Fertiliser

Reading and Analyzing your Fertilizer Bag. Dr. Cari Peters Vice President

Cranberry Nutrition: An A Z Guide. Joan R. Davenport Soil Scientist Washington State University

Essential quality and labelling requirements. Fertilisers Working Group meeting

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

Nutrient Management in Subtropical Tree Crops. The avocado model

Soil Composition. Air

FOLIAR NUTRITION, BIOSTIMULANTS, SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, SURFACTANTS, ADYUVANTS, WETTING AGENTS, AND SOIL AMENDMENT TECNOLOGY

Our Fertilizers Products:

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Miletin d.o.o., Crepaja. Flora Bečej - MK Group, Bečej. Uljarice Bačka, Ruma. Blago 4 - Treatment of sugar beet

YaraTera KRISTALON. Premium water soluble NPK fertilizer. Growth stage based formulas. Top grade Crop Nutrition

Liquid Fertilizers with Organic Substances - Agrochemical Effects Obtained by Application

A good starter feed for balanced growth. Reliable for most crops and situations. PRODUCT CODE 125.GB0173

AGRIFLUIDS. Soluble Fertiliser. n k p

mineral fertilizers

Water Soluble Fertilizer for Foliar Application

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 3: Fertilizers

Fertilization Programming

Getting the most from your foliar feeding

Investigating the probable cause of crop decline in central Oahu A.P. Pant, N.V. Hue, J. Uyeda, J. Sugano, and T. Radovich

Humizone. Rich Nutrients to Soil. SINOTECH (BEIJING) DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.

MAGIC RECIPES? Strawberry Fertigation in the UK. John Atwood Senior Horticultural Consultant.

Fertiliser Range PRODUCT GUIDE

VARIANCE OF THE MINERAL CONTENT FROM DIFFERENT ORGANS OF TWO Pisum sativum CULTIVARS

The content in macroelements (Na, K, Ca and Mg) of some fruits collected from Rachita locality, Timis county

Greenhouse Horticulture

mineral fertilizers

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

Fluid Sources for Micronutrients Starters for No-Tillage Corn and Soybean in Argentina. Ricardo Melgar

Comparison of Ammonia Volatilization from Surface Applied Fertilizers on High, Neutral, and Low ph Soils

What is NUTRIO? Product Line for Biologically Active Products. Biologically Derived Products. Microbial Inoculants

The effect of potassium nitrate on the uptake and translocation of foliar-applied nutrients in plants

Fertility management in soybean

FERTIGATION 24 FERTIGATION WITH DRIPPERS

PRELIMINARY RESEARCH IN OBTAINING FOLIAR CONCENTRATED SEMIECOLOGICAL FERTILISERS

Received: 4 th April-2014 Revised: 24 th May-2014 Accepted: 26 th May-2014 Research article

Fertilizer. Fertilizers. (FAO press release, April 1990): Nutrient Depletion. Nutrient Depletion 4/16/2012

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

NUTRITIVE ELEMENTS DYNAMICS IN ACIDIFYING SUBSTRATE ON CHAMAECYPARIS sp. CULTURE

Analysis. Methods of. of Soils, Plants, Waters, Fertilisers & Organic Manures. Edited by HLS Tandon

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Importance of fertigation scheduling

Yves Kessler European Turf Management. pro line. The new generation of biofertilizers. The.key for your quality turfgrass!

Abstract. Keywords: 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline, Nutrient Elements, Soilless Conditions, KDML 105. Introduction

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops. Monica Ozores-Hampton University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC Spring 2013

Catalog

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

Nutrient level (EC) in a pot is like a bank

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

The Florida Fertilizer Label 1

Fertilizers. Chapter INTRODUCTION

Citrus Greening Symposium Bartow, April 7, 2009

Basafer Plus/Fetrilon / Zitrilon /Mantrilon

Foliar Nutrition, Biostimulants, Specialty Chemicals, Wetting Agents & Surfactants, Contract Packaging, and Contract Formulating TURF PRODUCTS GROUP

Understanding a Soil Report

DuraTec. Partly Coated Fertilizer Unique Double Nitrogen Technology Immediate and long-term effect Environmentally friendly COMPO EXPERT

Turf Products Group

Correction of Zinc Deficiency in Avocado

UPTAKE OF MAJOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS BY GRASS BIOMASS AFTER AMELIORATION OF DEGRADED SOIL

Mir M. Seyedbagheri, Ph.D. Professor/Soil Agronomist 1

RESPONSE OF TOMATO AND CORN PLANTS TO INCREASING Cd LEVELS IN NUTRIENT CULTURE

Clean Nature Solutions GmbH / Kamptalstraße 66 / A-3550 Langenlois / /

Foliar Micronutrients for Broad Acre Crops Higher yield and better quality Balanced trace element supply for healthy crops Insurance against

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

> BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE

SOLUFEED WATER SOLUBLE FERTILISERS

Plants, soil, and nutrients. Created in partnership with Alex Lindsey, Ph.D., The Ohio State University

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND DISTRIBUTION. Tagliavini, M 1, Zanotelli, D 1.

Utilization of Slop Ash as a Source of Potassium for Corn Grown on the Pakchong Soil Series

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

The 1 th International and The 4 th National Congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture April 2012 in Isfahan, Iran

IONIC INTERACTIONS IN MAIZE GROWN UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS

Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

Micronutrient Disorders

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

Plant Health Solutions

Basatop. Partly coated Turf Fertilizer COMPO EXPERT EXPERTS FOR GROWTH

Effect of Macro & Micro Nutrients on Occurrences of Fusarium Wilt (Fusarium oxysporum) in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Evaluation of integrated nutrient diagnosis techniques to enhance productivity and quality in greenhouse rose crops

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF 15 N-LABELED FERTILIZERS ON MAIZE PLANT Received for publication,august 20, 2018 Accepted, October 2, 2018 DANIELA MIHALACHE 1, NICOLETA VRÎNCEANU 1*, RĂZVAN IONUȚ TEODORESCU 2, MIRCEA MIHALACHE 2, CRISTINA BACAU 3 1 National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agro-chemistry and Environment - RISSA, Bucharest, Romania 2 University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest 3 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Banat Regele Mihai I al Romaniei from Timisoara *Address correspondence to: Nicoleta Vrînceanu, National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agro-chemistry and Environment - RISSA, Bucharest, Romania, blv. Marasti 61; Tel: +40721698262; E-mail: nicoleta.vrinceanu@icpa.ro Abstract The effects of the experimental factors studied concerning isotopic indicators ( 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio, degree of δ 15 N isotopic accumulation, export of 15 N isotope, 15 N isotope concentration, degree of 15 N isotope uptake) were evaluated in maize plant, Cortes hybrid. Experimental foliar fertilizers were obtained: Nutrifert (complex NPK matrix, secondary nutrients and trace elements); Nutrifert vegetal (complex NPK matrix, secondary nutrients, trace elements and vegetal natural organic compounds); Nutrifert Plus (complex NPK matrix, secondary nutrients, trace elements and animal proteins). The natural organic compounds (compounds resulted by neutral hydro lysis of some proteic substances which have biostimulating and chelating action) showed the positive effect of foliar fertilization on nutrients use efficiency by biostimulating nutrients uptake by plant. The experiment was bifactorial with two factors: A, chemical nature of the 15 N-labeled nitrogen from the fertilizers applied radicular and B, chemical nature of the foliar fertilizers (with or without vegetal and animal proteic hydrolisates). By combining these two factors, 12 variants were established. The effects induced on isotopic indicators were evaluated. Analytical and isotopic determinations were performed from dried plant material samples. The experimental data were statistically processed by variance analysis using the Duncan multiple comparison test, multiple comparison threshold =0.05. For the graphic and statistical processing, the Excel, XLSTAT and SPSS 14.0 programs were used. Experimentally, it has been found that 15 N isotope can be used in agrochemical research to improve: the nutrition studies, the research concerning the absorption from soil and mobility in plant of nutrients and of different forms of nitrogen (amide N-NH2, nitric N-NO3, ammonical N-NH4) from nitrogen fertilizers, the experiments for demonstration of the utility of different fertilization methods. Keywords: plant, 15 N isotope, foliar fertilizer, radicular fertilizer, agrochemical testing 1. Introduction Agrochemistry deals with plant nutrition issues in a close connection with the application of fertilizers, amendments, pesticides and bioregulators. Based on soil-plantfertilizers relationships, it sets out rules and practical methods for plant nutrition regulation, fertilization and soil fertility evaluation. In the field of agriculture, it is recommended to use extraradicular fertilizers for: the treatment of certain plant nutrition diseases, preventing the plant diseases, increasing crop yield, product quality and reducing the negative impact of classical fertilizers on the environment. Also, plants treated with fertilizers containing chelating natural organic 1

compounds are more resistant to frost, to drought, to biotic and abiotic stress (D. MIHALACHE et al., 2015 [1]). The analysis of the existing literature data on classical extraradicular fertilizers or those with growth-enhancing compounds in their formulas has indicated that only the use of biostimulators in crops treatment, often does not result in some significant effects. In these cases, the explosive vegetative development of the plant is not sustained by an additional, rapid supply of macro and micronutrients (CIOROIANU Tr.M., C. SÎRBU, 2010 [2]). The widespread use of foliar fertilizers is a current European Community policy which has the aim of reducing the fertilization with classical fertilizers and, mitigating the soil and groundwater pollution, their management following the European environmental protection standards and that s of promoting a sustainable agriculture. In the last years, there have been concerns about the production of new types of foliar complex fertilizers containing natural compounds with biostimulating action. In the same time, it has been highlighted that biostimulators represent a special category of agro-compounds obtained synthetically or naturally, which affect the regulation of the physiological processes in the plant. Generally, bioregulatory products are organic compounds. When they are applied in low concentrations, have positive effects on the physiological processes of plant growth and development and on the quality and quantity of crop yield. (CIOROIANU Tr.M., C. SÎRBU, 2011 [3]). The nuclear techniques with 15 N isotope is useful for some agrochemical aspects related to: the efficient use of the different nitrogen forms (amide, nitric, ammoniacal) from fertilizers containing complex NPK matrix and organic substances with biostimulating and chelating properties (applied foliar and by incorporating in soil) for plants; biostimulating action of nutrients absorbtion from the natural soil resources (D. MIHALACHE et al., 2017 [4]). For a rigurous evaluation, the processes of nutrients absorbtion and metabolization by plants, determined by complex microscopic mechanisms, were studied by using stable radioactive isotopes ( 15 N, 2 H, 35 S, 13 C, 14 C, 32 P etc.). (BLAIR G., TILL R., 2000 [5]). 15 N is very widely used in the agricultural research. The use of stable 15 N in agrochemical testing is very helpful in understanding the nutritional processes of plants, which may lead to productivity and sustainability increases of the agricultural systems. The use of the stable 15 N isotope in agrochemical studies related to evaluation of nitrogen cycle and its transformation from the nitrogen fertilizers is well established, but in case of long term testing (perennial crops), there are some deficiency because of the plants size, sampling procedures, detection levels and of interferences in analytical and isotopic determinations (A. QUIÑONES et al., 2003 [6]; BUSTAMANTE C. et al., 1997 [7]; LIMA F., MALAVOLTA E., 2003 [8]; RAPISARDA P. et al., 2005 [9]). The objective of the study was to estimate the combined effects of chemical nature of the 15 N-labeled nitrogen from the fertilizers applied radicular and of the chemical nature of the foliar fertilizers on the isotopic indicators determined on the maize plant. Materials and methods The research was carried out within at the National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agro-chemistry and Environment ICPA Bucharest, within the Physical-Chemical Analysis Laboratory and the Laboratory of Fertilizer Quality Control and Testing, and the isotopic analyses (determination of δ 15 N parameter and 15 N/ 14 N percentage) 2

were determined at Cornell Isotope Laboratory (COIL), Cornell University, Ithaca, United States of America. In Table 1 the experimental variants and types of fertilization are presented. The following experimental foliar fertilizers were obtained: Nutrifert (complex NPK matrix, secondary nutrients and trace elements); Nutrifert vegetal (complex NPK matrix, secondary nutrients, trace elements and vegetal natural organic compounds); Nutrifert Plus (complex NPK matrix, secondary nutrients, trace elements and animal protein). In Figure 1 is presented the technological flow of production of NPK foliar fertilizers used in agrochemical testing. K 2 CO 3 Demineralized water H 3 PO 4 THE NEUTRALIZATION PROCESS Oligoelements and secondary elements (salts of Cu, Mn, B, Co, Mo, Fe, Zn, Mg, S) EDTANa 4 C 6 H 8 O 7 Urea Ammonium nitrate THE CHELATING PROCESS Organic substances THE MIXING PROCESS THE FILTRATION PROCESS FOLIAR FERTLIZERS (NUTRIFERT, NUTRIFERT VEGETAL, NUTRIFERT PLUS) Figure 1. Technological flow of production of NPK liquid fertilizers with secondary nutrients and trace, and organic substances 3

NPK 15-15-15 Romanian Biotechnological Letters Vol. 23, No. x, 2018 Within these agrochemical tests, for radicular fertilization, 15 N-labeled fertilizers (urea and ammonium nitrate) were used by incorporating in the soil: ( 15 NH 2 ) 2 CO, urea with 10% 15 N-labeled (-NH 2 ); 15 NH 4 -NO 3, ammonium nitrate with 10% ammonia nitrogen 15 N-labeled (-NH 4 ); NH 4-15 NO 3, ammonium nitrate with 10% ammonia nitrogen 15 N-labeled (-NO 3 ) Working conditions: Mitscherlich pots with 10 kg of dry soil, type Chernozem. Test plant: maize, CORTES hybrid. Nutrients dose for basic fertilization was N 45 P 45 K 45 using NPK 15:15:15 (0.8 g/pot), equivalent of 300 kg fertilizer/ha. Basic fertilization was supplemented with 15 N-labelled fertilizer, ( 15 NH 2 ) 2 CO, 15 NH 4 - NO 3 and NH 4-15 NO 3, incorporated in soil. The quantity of 15 N isotope applied was 30 mg/pot. Foliar fertilizer treatments: 30 ml/pot (15 ml/plant) as 1% concentration solution. Irrigation 50% from the water pot capacity. Plants maintenance: daily irrigation up to 2/3 of the water capacity of the pot. 12 experimental variants; 3 replicates, 2 plants/pot, for each of the experimental factors combination (experimental variants). The control was basic and foliar fertilized. Harvesting maize biomass was done 60 days after seeding. Table 1. Experimental diagram and types of fertilization BASIC (nutrients dose N45P45K45) TYPES OF FERTILIZATION RADICULAR 15 N-labeled fertilizer UREA ( 15 N-NH2) AMMONIUM NITRATE ( 15 N-NO3) AMMONIUM NITRATE ( 15 N-NH4) UREA ( 15 N-NH2) AMMONIUM NITRATE ( 15 N-NO3) AMMONIUM NITRATE ( 15 N-NH4) UREA ( 15 N-NH2) AMMONIUM NITRATE ( 15 N-NO3) AMMONIUM NITRATE ( 15 N-NH4) FOLIAR NUTRIFERT PLUS NUTRIFERT VEGETAL NUTRIFERT The experimental data were statistically processed by variance analysis using the Duncan multiple comparison test, multiple comparison threshold =0.05. For the graphic and statistical processing, the Excell, XLSTAT and SPSS 14.0 programs were used. 3. Results and discussions The effects induced by combining the experimental factors on isotopic indicators ( 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio, degree isotopic accumulation δ 15 N in the maize plant, export of 15 N isotope with maize plant, 15 N isotope concentration in the maize plant, absorption degree of 15 N isotope from soil in maize plant) were evaluated in maize plant. The experiment was bifactorial with two factors: 4

A - chemical nature of the 15 N-labeled nitrogen from the fertilizers applied radicular; Graduations: a 1 Control; a 2 15 N-NH 2 ; a 3 15 N-NO 3 ; a 4 15 N-NH 4 a1 b1 Control+Nutrifert a1 b2 Control+Nutrifert Vegetal a1 b3 Control+Nutrifert Plus a2 b1 15 N-NH2+Nutrifert a2 b2 15 N-NH2+Nutrifert Vegetal a2 b3 15 N-NH2+Nutrifert Plus a3 b1-15 N-NO3 Nutrifert a3 b2 15 N-NO3+Nutrifert Vegetal a3 b3 15 N-NO3+Nutrifert Plus a4 b1 15 N-NH4+Nutrifert a4 b2 15 N-NH4+Nutrifert Vegetal a4 b3 15 N-NH4+Nutrifert Plus B - chemical nature of the foliar fertilizers. Graduations: b 1 Nutrifert; b 2 Nutrifert Vegetal; b 3 Nutrifert Plus. By combining the graduations of these two factors, AB, 12 variants were established. Figure 2 shows the obtained values that were ordered in descending order resulting in a hierarchy of the effects of the application of the 12 experimental treatments. The highest values were: +Nutrifert Vegetal (3,08%) +Nutrifert Plus (3,07%) +Nutrifert (3,04%) Values ranked in the 1-3 hierarchy do not differ statistically from each other. Ammonium nitrate 15 N-NH 4 (radicular applied) generated the highest values for 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio in the maize plant. AB 3.08 d* 3.07 d 3.04 d 2.75 cd Control + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert 0.47 a 0.43 a 2.71 cd 2.69 cd 2.54 bc 2.45 bc 2.30 b Control + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Vegetal Control + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Plus 0.41 a 0 1 2 3 4 5 15 N/ 14 N ISOTOPE RATIO (%) *The values folowed by the same letter (a, b,...) don't differ significantly from each other ( Duncan multiple comparison test-significance threshold =0.05) Figure 2. Effects induced by combining the chemical nature of radicular nitrogen source (A) with foliar fertilizers (B) on 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio in the maize plant 5

Figure 3 shows the obtained values that were ordered in descending order resulting in a hierarchy of the effects of the application of the 9 experimental treatments. The highest values were: +Nutrifert Vegetal (7728 ) +Nutrifert Plus (7699 ) +Nutrifert (7616 ) Values ranked in the 1-3 hierarchy do not differ statistically from each other. Ammonium nitrate 15 N-NH 4 (radicular applied) generated the highest values degree for isotopic accumulation δ 15 N in the maize plant. AB 7728 d* 7699 d 7616 d 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert 6774 cd 6656 cd 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert vegetal 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Vegetal 6599 cd 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus 6153 bc 5900 bc 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Plus 5459 b 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 ISOTOPIC ACCUMULATION DEGREE d 15 N ( ) *The values folowed by the same letter (a, b,...) don't differ significantly from each other ( Duncan multiple comparison test-significance threshold =0.05) Figure 3. Effects induced by combining the chemical nature of radicular nitrogen source (A) with foliar fertilizers (B) on degree isotopic accumulation δ 15 N in the maize plant Figure 4 shows the obtained values that were ordered in descending order resulting in a hierarchy of the effects of the application of the 12 experimental treatments. The highest values were: urea 15 N-NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus (0,0036%) ammonium nitrate 15 N-NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus (0,0036%) urea 15 N-NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal (0,0035%) Values ranked in the 1-3 hierarchy do not differ statistically from each other. Urea 15 N-NH 2 and ammonium nitrate 15 N-NO 3 (radicular applied) generated the highest values for concentration 15 N isotope in the maize plant. 6

AB 0.0036 b* 0.0036 b 0.0035 b 0.0035 b Control + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert 0.0011 a 0.0010 a 0.0035 b 0.0034 b 0.0034 b 0.0032 b 0.0030 b Control + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Vegetal Control + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Plus 0.0009 a 0.000 0,000 0,001 0.001 0,002 0.002 0,003 0.003 0,004 0.004 0.005 0,005 15 N ISOTOPE CONCENTRATION (%) *The values folowed by the same letter (a, b,...) don't differ significantly from each other ( Duncan multiple comparison test-significance threshold =0.05) Figure 4. Effects induced by combining the chemical nature of radicular nitrogen source (A) with foliar fertilizers (B) on concentration the 15 N isotope in the maize plant Figure 5 shows the obtained values that were ordered in descending order resulting in a hierarchy of the effects of the application of the 12 experimental treatments. The highest values were: urea 15 N-NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus urea 15 N-NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal (9,34 mg) (8,94 mg) ammonium nitrate 15 N-NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus (8,87 mg) Values ranked in the 1-3 hierarchy do not differ statistically from each other. Urea 15 N-NH 2 (radicular applied) generated the highest values for 15 N isotope export with the maize plant. 7

AB 9.34 b* 8.94 b 8.87 b 8.67 b Control + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert 1.81 a 1.47 b 8.43 b 8.40 b 8.19 b 8.12 b 7.61 b Control + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Vegetal Control + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Plus 1.34 a 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 N ISOTOPE EXPORT (mg) *The values folowed by the same letter (a, b,...) don't differ significantly from each other ( Duncan multiple comparison test-significance threshold =0.05) Figure 5. Effects induced by combining the chemical nature of radicular nitrogen source (A) with foliar fertilizers (B) on 15 N isotope export with the maize plant Figure 6 shows the obtained values that were ordered in descending order resulting in a hierarchy of the effects of the application of the 9 experimental treatments. The highest value was: urea 15 N-NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus (26,0%) Values obtained in the hierarchy of this 9 treatments do not differ statistically from each other. Urea 15 N-NH 2 (radicular applied) generated the highest values for absorption degree of 15 N isotope from soil in maize plant. AB 26.0 a* 24.7 a 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert 24.4 a 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert 23.8 a 23.0 a 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Vegetal 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert vegetal 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Vegetal 22.9 a 22.2 a 15 N - NH 2 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NO 3 + Nutrifert Plus 15 N - NH 4 + Nutrifert Plus 22.0 a 20.3 a 0 10 20 30 15 N ISOTOPE ADSORPTION DEGREE (%) *The values folowed by the same letter (a, b,...) don't differ significantly from each other ( Duncan multiple comparison test-significance threshold =0.05) Figure 6. Effects induced by combining the chemical nature of radicular nitrogen source (A) with foliar fertilizers (B) on absorption degree of 15 N isotope from soil in maize plant 8

Conclusions 1. Four experimental foliar fertilizers (NUTRIFERT NUTRIFERT, NUTRIFERT PLUS, NUTRIFERT ECO) with complex matrix type N and NPK, with secondary nutrients, trace elements and natural organic substances with a chelating and biostimulating role were obtained. 2. The values of 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio, values of concentration 15 N isotope in maize plant and values of 15 N isotope export with the maize plant, that were obtained as a result of treatments including radicular fertilization with 15 N-labeled fertilizers and foliar fertilization, differ statistically significantly when compared to the values obtained for Control. 3. The degree of isotopic accumulation δ 15 N values in the maize plant, obtained as a result of treatments including radicular fertilization with 15 N-labeled fertilizers and foliar fertilization, differs statistically significantly between them. 4. The values of absorption degree of 15 N isotope from soil in maize plant do not differ statistically significantly between them. 5. The highest values for 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio and degree of isotopic accumulation δ 15 N in the maize plant were generated by the combined effects of radicular application of ammonium nitrate 15 N-NH 4 with foliar fertilizers. 6. The highest values for the 15 N isotope concentration in maize plant were generated by the combined effects of radicular application of ammonium nitrate 15 N-NO 3 with Nutrifert as foliar fertilizer and urea 15 N-NH 2 with Nutrifert Vegetal, respectively and Nutrifert Plus as foliar fertilizers. 7. The highest values for 15 N isotope export with the maize plant were generated by the combined effects of radicular application of urea 15 N-NH 2 with Nutrifert Vegetal, respectively and Nutrifert Plus as foliar fertilizers. 8. The chemical nature of the three foliar fertilizers Nutrifert, Nutrifert Vegetal, Nutrifert Plus did not affect the values obtained for 15 N isotopic indicators in maize plants. References 1. D. MIHALACHE, C. SÎRBU, A. GRIGORE, I.C. CALCIU, N. MĂRIN, Phisical, chemical and agrochermical characterization of some organo-mineral fertilizers, Romanian Biotechnological Letters Journal, vol. 22(1), p. 12259-12266 (2017). 2. Tr.M. CIOROIANU, C. SÎRBU, M. DUMITRAȘCU, S.L. ȘTEFĂNESCU, The fertilizers with chelate proteinic substances with for use in the organic agriculture, Lucrări științifice USAMV Iași, seria Horticultură, vol. 52, (2010). 3. Tr.M. CIOROIANU, C. SÎRBU, Caracterizarea și testarea agrochimică a unor fertilizanți extraradiculari cu substanțe proteice, Editura Sitech, Craiova, (2011). 4. D. MIHALACHE, C. SIRBU, Tr.M. CIOROIANU, O. GAȚE, Fertilizers formulas with extraroot application Physico-chemical and agrochemical characteristics, Scientific Papers, Series A. Agronomy, vol. LVIII, p. 81-84 (2015). 9

5. G. BLAIR, R. TILL, Innovations in isotope techniques to enhance the evaluation and management of nutrients sources, Proceedings of International Symposium on Nuclear Techniques in Integrated Plant Nutrients, Water and Soil Management, IAEA-SM- 363/83, Austria p. 9-16, (2000). 6. A. QUIÑONES, J. BAÑULS, E.P. MILLO, F. LEGAZ, Effects of 15 N application frequency on nitrogen uptake efficiency in Citrus trees, Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 160(12), p. 1429-1434, (2003). 7. C. BUSTAMANTE, M. OCHOA, M.I. RODRIGUEZ, Balance of three nitrogen 15 N fertilizers in a Cuban Oxisol cultivated with Coffea arabica L., Tropicultura, vol.15, p.169-172, (1997). 8. O. F. de Lima Filho, E. Malavolta, Studies on mineral nutrition of the coffee plant (Coffea arabica L. cv. Catuaí Vermelho). LXIV. Remobilization and re-utilization of nitrogen and potassium by normal and deficient plants, Braz. J. Biol. vol. 63(3), São Carlos, (2003). 9. P. RAPISARDA, M.L. CALABRETTA, G. ROMANO, F. INTRIGLIOLO, Nitrogen metabolism components as a tool to discriminate between organic and conventional citrus fruits, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 53(7), p. 2664 2669, (2005). 10