Chan HLY, Chan CK, Hui AJ, et al. Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic HBV Infected Patients with Normal ALT and High HBV DNA Levels

Similar documents
Hepatitis B Virus therapy. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Tenofovir as a drug of choice for the chronic hepatitis B treatment

Novedades en el tratamiento de la hepatitis B: noticias desde la EASL. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebrón Barcelona

Hepatitis B Virus therapy. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Gilead Sciences, Durham, NC, USA

Management of Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Supplementary materials: Predictors of response to pegylated interferon in chronic hepatitis B: a

Clinical Case. Christophe Hézode, Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris-Est University, Créteil, France

Abstract PS8/2. Double-blind treatment phase D/C/F/TAF. + matching D/C + F/TDF placebo D/C/F/TAF. D/C + F/TDF + matching D/C/F/TAF placebo

The Impact of HBV Therapy on Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

Does Viral Cure Prevent HCC Development

Final Clinical Study Report. to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI463110

Don t interfere My first choice is always nucs!

NUCs for Chronic Hepatitis B. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Instituto Carlos III. Barcelona.

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Cirrhotic Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 EXPEDITION-1

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2

Slides are the property of the author and AASLD. Permission is required from both AASLD and the author for reuse.

Is there a need for combination therapy? No. Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona. Spain

Delta hepatitis: How to manage and optimize therapy? Dominique ROULOT Unité d Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Management of HBV infection between Specialist and General Practitioners

Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)

Optimized HBV Treatment Through Baseline and on-treatment Predictor Oral Antiviral Therapy. Watcharasak Chotiyaputta

Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI424138

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report AI Addendum #1. Open-label Dosing Phase

DRUGS IN PIPELINE. Pr JC YOMBI UCL-AIDS REFERENCE CENTRE BREACH Sept 27, 2015

Current Status of HBV and Liver Transplant

Per the study design and a limitation of this analysis, swabs were not tested for HPV types 6

Disclaimer. Presenter Release are for reactive use by Medical Information only internal learning/educational use only

CURRENT TREATMENT. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia Bon Secours Health System Richmond and Newport News, Virginia

Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies: Clinical Case Presentation

Inarigivir: A novel RIG-I agonist for chronic hepatitis B

ART Treatment. ART Treatment

entecavir, 0.5mg and 1mg film-coated tablets and 0.05 mg/ml oral solution, Baraclude SMC No. (747/11) Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd

For now, do not stop NUCs PHC R. PARANÁ Federal University of Bahia, Brazil HUPES-University Hospital Gastro-Hepatology Unit

Arbutus Biopharma Corporation, Burnaby, Canada.

How to use pegylated Interferon for Chronic Hepatitis B in 2015

C Orkin, 1 G Moyle, 2 M Fisher, 3 H Wang, 4 J Ewan 4 and ROCKET I Study Group. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK;

Hepatitis B Case Studies

TDF containing ART: Efficacy and Safety. Dr Lloyd B. Mulenga Adult Infectious Diseases Centre University Teaching Hospital Lusaka, Zambia

The results of the ARTEN study. Vicente Soriano Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Hepatitis B: Future treatment developments

Background. ΝΑ therapy in CHBe- until HBsAg clearance. (EASL guidelines 2012)

HBeAg-positve chronic hepatts B: Why do I treat my patent with a NA? Maria But

BHIVA Best of CROI Feedback Meetings. London Birmingham North West England Cardiff Gateshead Edinburgh

Discontinuation of Nucleotide or Nucleoside Analogue therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B infection

Treatment of hepatitis B : the guidelines and real life

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

tenofovir disoproxil (as fumarate), 245mg, film-coated tablet (Viread ) SMC No. (720/11) Gilead Sciences Ltd

Prediction of HBsAg Loss by Quantitative HBsAg Kinetics during Long-Term 2015

Clinical dilemmas in HBeAg-negative CHB

HBV Therapy in Special Populations: Liver Cirrhosis

MF Yuen 2, CS Coffin 3, M Elkhashab 4, S Greenbloom 5, A Ramji 6, H LY Chan 7, RP Iyer 1, S Locarnini 8, C Macfarlane 1, NH Afdhal 1, W Kim 9

Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

SINGLE. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects

HBV Diagnosis and Treatment

Hepatitis B Update. Jorge L. Herrera, M.D. University of South Alabama Mobile, AL. Gastroenterology

Guidelines for PrEP in PWID

TDF Renal Dysfunction

12th European AIDS Conference / EACS ARV Therapies and Therapeutic Strategies A CME Newsletter

Supplementary Online Content

Vemlidy. (tenofovir alafenamide) New Product Slideshow

PrEP for HIV Prevention. Adult Clinical Guideline from the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute

29th Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board Meeting

Update on Real-World Experience With HARVONI

Update on HBV Treatment

Seven-Year Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Faculty: Relationships with financial sponsors: Speakers Bureau/Honoraria: Advisory board/consulting Fees:

Chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation in cancer patients

Introduction. Cahn et al. Andean Pacific HIV Clinical Forum 2017; Santiago, Chile. Abstract 2.

ART=antiretroviral therapy; C=cobicistat; D=darunavir; F=emtricitabine; STR=single-tablet regimen; TAF=tenofovir alafenamide.

COMPETING INTEREST OF FINANCIAL VALUE

coinfected patients predicts HBsAg clearance during long term exposure to tenofovir

Real Life Experience of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine Dual Therapy As a Switching Regimen in HIVTR Cohort

Cornerstones of Hepatitis B: Past, Present and Future

Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with HBsAg Seroclearance

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B 2013 update

The effect of lamivudine- versus tenofovir-containing antiretroviral regimen on hepatitis B infection in a cohort of HIV infected long term survivors

Is there a need for combination treatment? Yes!

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. with a nucleos(t)ide analogue?

Presentation #: OP221

Nuevos tratamientos para la hepatitis B y Delta.

CROI 2013: New Drugs for Treatment and PrEP

Scottish Medicines Consortium

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR HEPSERA. International Nonproprietary Name: Adefovir Dipivoxil. Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/485/II/30

V.G. Bain, P. Marotta, K. Kaita, E. Yoshida, M. Swain, R. Bailey, A. Neumann, P. Cronin, J. McHutchison, E. Pulkstenis, M.

Supplementary Data. Supplementary Table S2. Antiretroviral Therapies Taken with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir

Natural History of HBV Infection

Differences in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rates (GFR) in Efavirenz (EFV) or Tenofovir (TDF)-treated Adults in ESS40006

ACCEPTED. Title Page: Full Title: Elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in HIV-Infected Patients with Mild. to Moderate Renal Impairment

STRIBILD (aka. The Quad Pill)

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

Mutazioni di HBV in corso di trattamento; quale approccio razionale?

Hepatitis B. Epidemiology and Natural History and Implications for Treatment

Virological suppression and PIs. Diego Ripamonti Malattie Infettive - Bergamo

27/01/17. Post-partum ALT flare. HBV vaccine cannot protect all babies from high viral load carrier mothers

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Transcription:

Online supplement to: Chan HLY, Chan CK, Hui AJ, et al. Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic HBV Infected Patients with Normal ALT and High HBV DNA Levels Supplementary Figure 1. CONSORT disposition of study patients. Supplementary Figure 2. Per-protocol proportion of patients with HBV DNA <69 IU/mL throughout the study. Supplementary Figure 3. Week 192 viral loads of those subjects with detectable HBV DNA at the end of the study. Supplementary Figure 4. Proportion of patients receiving TDF alone (solid circle) or TDF/FTC (open circle) who achieve a >0.5 log10 HBsAg decline from baseline. Proportion is based on subjects with values at each time point (on-treatment). Supplementary Figure 5. Mean values of HBsAg over time among patients receiving TDF alone (solid circle) or TDF/FTC (open circle). Supplementary Table 1. ITT analysis of achieving the primary efficacy endpoint for patients who achieve and don t achieve the primary endpoint at Week 48. Supplementary Table 2. Per-protocol analysis of achieving the primary efficacy endpoint for patients who achieve and don t achieve the primary endpoint at Week 48. Supplementary Table 3. HBV DNA levels of patients with HBV DNA >69 IU/mL at Week 192 over the final year of treatment. Supplementary Table 4. Bivariate analysis of associations of baseline characteristics with having HBV DNA <29 IU/mL among those subjects with Week 192 values. Supplementary Table 5. Odds ratio of baseline characteristics from logistic regression analysis of those subjects with Week 192 values. Supplementary Table 6. Cox proportional hazard analysis evaluating predictors of achieving either HBV DNA <69 IU/mL or HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. Supplementary Table 7. Intention to treat and per protocol proportion of patients with HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 192 by baseline HBV DNA level. Supplementary Table 8. Resistance Surveillance of HBV isolates. Supplementary Table 9. Phosphate, egfr (calculated using Cockcroft-Gault) over time.

Supplementary Figure 1: CONSORT disposition of study patients. 309 Assessed for eligibility 180 Excluded (Screening Failures) 129 Randomized 64 Allocation to TDF/FTC 62 Received TDF/FTC 2 Did not receive TDF/FTC 65 Allocation to TDF 64 Received TDF 1 Did not receive TDF 1 Lost to follow-up 9 (15%) Discontinued TDF/FTC 1 Investigator s decision 1 Protocol violation 5 Withdrawal of consent 2 Adverse events * 0 Lost to follow-up 12 (18%) Discontinued TDF 2 Investigator s decision 1 Protocol violation 8 Withdrawal of consent 1 Adverse events ** 54 (87%) remaining in study at Week 192 53 (83%) remaining in study at Week 192 * depression, spontaneous abortion ** death (homicide)

Supplemental Figure 2: Per-protocol proportion of patients with HBV DNA <69 IU/mL throughout the study.

Supplemental Figure 3: Week 192 viral loads of those subjects with detectable HBV DNA at the end of the study.

M e a n H B s A g (lo g 1 0 IU /m L ) Supplemental Figure 4: Proportion of patients receiving TDF alone (solid circle) or TDF/FTC (open circle) who achieve a >0.5 log 10 HBsAg decline from baseline. Proportion is based on subjects with values at each time point (on-treatment). Supplemental Figure 5: Mean values of HBsAg over time among patients receiving TDF alone (solid circle) or TDF/FTC (open circle). 5.0 4.5 T D F T D F /F T C 4.0 3.5 3.0 0 2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 W e e k o f S tu d y

Supplemental Table 1: ITT analysis of achieving the primary efficacy endpoint for patients who achieve and don t achieve the primary endpoint at Week 48. TDF FTC+TDF HBV DNA >69 IU/mL at Week 48, N 36 21 HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 96, n/n (%) 12/36 (33.3%) 14/21 (66.7%) HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 144, n/n (%) 20/36 (55.6%) 17/21 (81.0%) HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 192, n/n (%) 16/36 (44.4%) 14/21 (66.7%) HBV DNA 69 IU/mL at Week 48, N 26 37 DNA<400 copies/ml at Week 96, n/n (%) 22/26 (84.6%) 33/37 (89.2%) DNA<400 copies/ml at Week 144, n/n (%) 20/26 (76.9%) 33/37 (89.2%) DNA<400 copies/ml at Week 192, n/n (%) 19/26 (73.1%) 33/37 (89.2%) Supplemental Table 2: Per-protocol analysis of achieving the primary efficacy endpoint for patients who achieve and don t achieve the primary endpoint at Week 48. TDF FTC+TDF HBV DNA >69 IU/mL at Week 48 HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 96, n/n (%) 12/36 (33.3%) 14/21 (66.7%) HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 144, n/n (%) 20/33 (60.6%) 17/21 (81.0%) HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 192, n/n (%) 16/33 (48.5%) 14/20 (70.0%) HBV DNA 69 IU/mL at Week 48 DNA<400 copies/ml at Week 96, n/n (%) 22/23 (95.7%) 33/35 (94.3%) DNA<400 copies/ml at Week 144, n/n (%) 20/22 (90.9%) 33/35 (94.3%) DNA<400 copies/ml at Week 192, n/n (%) 19/20 (95.0%) 33/34 (97.1%)

Supplemental Table 3: HBV DNA levels of patients with HBV DNA >69 IU/mL at Week 192 over the final year of treatment. Subject Number Treatment Arm HBV DNA (IU/mL) Week 144 Week 160 Week 176 Week 192 1113 TDF 39 60 134 471000000 1102 TDF <29 46 <29 20900 1048 TDF 41 <29 49 70 1006 TDF 434 1220 976 1740 1050 TDF 688 648 281 613 1015 TDF 42 63 217 76 1074 TDF 1190 760 719 403 1080 TDF 134 391 436 131 1085 TDF <29 <29 <29 427 1111 TDF 31 59 59 107 1042 TDF 54100 5590000 3400000 27100 1072 TDF 107 55 69 73 1093 TDF 115 228 598 1260 1027 TDF 36 161 <29 224 1031 TDF 70 40 34 90 1059 TDF 64 118 471 139000000 1124 TDF 45 100 138 162 1052 TDF 331 111 98 37 1047 TDF+FTC 37 <29 139 91 1129 TDF+FTC <29 <29 69 39 1040 TDF+FTC 1070 506 420 110 1070 TDF+FTC <29 <29 <29 303 1034 TDF+FTC <29 <29 <29 605 1065 TDF+FTC 111 43 299 182 1032 TDF+FTC <29 <29 <29 37200000

Supplemental Table 4: Bivariate analysis of associations of baseline characteristics with having HBV DNA <29 IU/mL among those subjects with Week 192 values. HBV DNA 29 IU/mL N=35 HBV DNA <29 IU/mL N=72 p- value Female gender, n/n (%) 11/35 (31.4) 40/72 (55.6) 0.024 Baseline HBsAg, log 10, mean 4.88 4.67 0.004 TDF/FTC treatment, n/n (%) 11/35 (31.4) 43/72 (59.7) 0.008 Baseline HBV DNA, log 10, mean 9.26 9.11 0.021 Age >30, n/n (%) 18/35 (51.4) 41/72 (56.9) 0.68 Genotype B, n/n (%) 19/35 (54.3) 32/72 (44.4) 0.411 Asian race, n/n (%) 29/35 (82.9) 66/72 (91.7) 0.201 Baseline BMI, n/n (%) 24.18 22.90 0.132 Baseline ALT, n/n (%) 27.23 26.92 0.414 Years of HBV Positive, n/n (%) Age, n/n (%) 9.21 31.63 9.46 34.72 0.939 0.25 Supplemental Table 5: Odds ratio of baseline characteristics from logistic regression analysis of those subjects with Week 192 values. Odds Ratio Confidence Interval Female gender 2.88 1.14-7.25 TDF/FTC treatment 3.19 1.29-7.91 Supplemental Table 6: Cox proportional hazard analysis evaluating predictors of achieving either HBV DNA <69 IU/mL or HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. Hazard Ratio Confidence Interval HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Wk 192 Female gender 1.997 1.253-3.181 TDF/FTC treatment Baseline HBsAg HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Wk 192 1.648 0.451 1.034-2.625 0.256-0.793 Female gender 1.670 1.022-2.729 TDF/FTC treatment Baseline HBsAg 1.763 0.390 1.070-2.903 0.225-0.677

Supplemental Table 7: Intention to treat and per protocol proportion of patients with HBV DNA <69 IU/mL at Week 192 by baseline HBV DNA level. TDF 300mg + placebo TDF 300mg + FTC 200mg Intention To Treat, % (CI) HBV DNA <9 log10 copies/ml 57.1 (34-78.2) 84.2 (60.4-96.6) HBV DNA 9 log10 copies /ml 53.5 (37.3-68.8) 72.1 (56.3-84.7) Per Protocol, n/n (%) HBV DNA <9 log10 copies /ml 75 (47.6-92.7) 88.9 (65.3-98.6) HBV DNA 9 log10 copies /ml 62.2 (44.8-77.5) 86.1 (70.5-95.3) Supplemental Table 8: Resistance Surveillance of HBV isolates. TDF 300mg + placebo (n=64) TDF 300mg + FTC 200mg (n=62) HBV Genotype performed Baseline, n (%) 63 (98) 62 (100) Week 48, n (%) 36 (56) 24 (39) Week 96, n (%) 26 (41) 10 (16) Week 144, n (%) 16 (25) 7 (11) Week 192, n (%) 18 (28) 8 (13) HBV genotype samples, total samples/unique subjects 96/40 49/29 Unable to PCR 12 11 No changes from baseline pol/rt 62 24 Conserved-site changes 6 5 rtl29f/l 2 0 rtp170p/s 0 2 Unique polymorphic-site changes 16 9

Supplemental Table 9: Phosphate, egfr (calculated using Cockcroft-Gault) over time. TDF 300mg + placebo (n=64) TDF 300mg + FTC 200mg (n=62) Phosphate mg/dl (median) Baseline 3.6 3.5 Wk 48 3.6 3.7 Wk 96 3.5 3.5 Wk 144 3.5 3.45 Wk 192 3.5 3.5 egfr ml/min (median) Baseline 109 107 Wk 48 108.5 101.5 Wk 96 106 103 Wk 144 101 103 Wk 192 98 94.5 GFR <70 ml/min, n (%) 0 5 (8.1) GFR <60 ml/min, n (%) 0 2 (3.2) GFR decline by 20%, n (%) 10 (15.6) 14 (22.6)