West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

Similar documents
West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Position Statement

WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE IN MADISON AND DANE COUNTY

Clinical Information on West Nile Virus (WNV) Infection

Thomas McGee, L.C. 920 Main Street, Suite 1700 Kansas City, MO (816) * Toll Free (800) WEST NILE VIRUS

Mosquitoborne Viral Diseases

Arboviral Surveillance and Control Annual Report: Pennsylvania, 2014

Evaluation of the West Nile Surveillance System for the State of Kansas

SHASTA COUNTY Health and Human Services Agency

TREATING THE REHAB PATIENT WITH WEST NILE VIRUS. Amy J. Wilson MD Medical Director, Baylor Institution of Rehabilitation January 2014

West Nile Virus Los Angeles County

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2013 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Epidemiological Profile of West Nile Virus in Kent County, Michigan

Appendix I (a) Human Surveillance Case Definition (Revised July 4, 2005)

Case Classification West Nile Virus Neurological Syndrome (WNNS)

West Nile Virus. Syndrome. (Family: Flaviviridae) Severe Manifestations (Typically >50 years of age) NEUROLOGICAL (Meningoencephalitis >Meningitis)

Protecting You and Your Community from West Nile Virus. Eagle County Environmental Health Department

West Nile Virus. Family: Flaviviridae

Appendix B: Provincial Case Definitions for Reportable Diseases

Arbovirus Surveillance in Massachusetts 2016 Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) Arbovirus Surveillance Program

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2013 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, July 23, 2013

West Nile Virus. Lyle R. Petersen, M.D., M.P.H.

Mosquito Control Update. Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 16, 2016

NEBRASKA ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE AND MOSQUITO MONITORING PROGRAM 2018 UPDATE #2

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: September 2

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: For week ending July 7

West Nile Virus. Lyndon Badcoe PhD Epidemiologist

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: June 23

West Nile Virus and West Nile Encephalitis Frequently Asked Questions

Endemic Human Mosquito-borne Disease in Wisconsin Residents,

West Nile Virus Program Final Report West Nile Virus. Mosquito BIle ProI8ctIon. .~...aodllogll""",,~-,iiiciuciiif~_8fici""""""

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2014 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Arboviruses in Florida. Carina Blackmore, DVM, PhD Florida Department of Health Bureau of Environmental Public Health Medicine

West Nile Fever. F. Karup Pedersen 2012

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: August 19

West Nile Virus in the Region of Peel 2002

Fight The Bite. Michelle Cole Auburn University Outreach Director

Disease Carrying Insects

Using administrative medical claims data to estimate underreporting of infectious zoonotic diseases

Outbreak of West Nile Virus in Southern France in 2003

Controlling Urban Epidemics of West Nile Virus Infection

West Nile Virus Activity in Harris County, Texas Rudy Bueno, Jr., Ph.D. Division Director, HCPHES Mosquito Control

City of Arlington West Nile Virus Response Plan 2013

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 3: January 14 to January 20, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

Outbreak Investigation Guidance for Vectorborne Diseases

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 4: January 21 to January 27, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

Geographic distribution ZIKV

West Nile Virus. By Frank Riusech

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2016 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Mosquito Control Matters

Analysis of West Nile Virus in Franklin County, Pennsylvania

Tickborne Disease Case Investigations

2015 Mosquito Abatement Plan QUALITY OF LIFE & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MARCH 23, 2015

Of Mice, Men and Mosquitoes

GUESTS IN ATTENDANCE: Mr. Douglas Coover, Harrison Hospital; Mr. Gerry Morrow, Reporter, KMAS radio

Manitoba Weekly West Nile virus Surveillance Report

Durham Region Influenza Bulletin: 2017/18 Influenza Season

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Zika virus disease

JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS (J.E.)

West Nile Virus Surveillance in mosquito vectors (Culex pipiens)

Dilemmas in the Management of Meningitis & Encephalitis HEADACHE AND FEVER. What is the best initial approach for fever, headache, meningisums?

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Avian Influenza A (H7N9) update

Influenza Season and EV-D68 Update. Johnathan Ledbetter, MPH

Mosquito Threats in LA County West Nile virus & Zika

INJURY OR DEATH FROM WEST NILE, ZIKA OR OTHER VIRUSES VECTORED BY MOSQUITOES

Zika Virus. Lee Green Vector-Borne Epidemiologist Indiana State Department of Health. April 13, 2016

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Edward G. Rendell, Governor Dennis C Wolff, Secretary

WASHOE ADVISORY BALLOT QUESTION NO. 1

Alberta s Response Plan (2005)

DENGUE AND BLOOD SAFETY. Ester C Sabino, MD, PhD Dep. of Infectious Disease/Institute of Tropical Medicine University of São Paulo

Tick-borne Disease Surveillance

Drought and Public Health

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT SERVICES HALDIMAND-NORFOLK. West Nile Virus Report

INFLUENZA IN MANITOBA 2010/2011 SEASON. Cases reported up to October 9, 2010

Emerging vector-borne diseases in the United States: What s next and are we prepared?

EPIDEMIOLOGY SURVEILLANCE REPORT Northeast Region. Namitha Reddy Regional Coordinator North/Central West Region

Vector-Borne Diseases Update: Maricopa County

Chatham County WNV Outbreak, What the heck are they doing down there? Robert A. Moulis Pamela T. Thompson Chatham County Mosquito Control

Professor Michael Kossove

Annual Epidemiological Report

EPIDEMIOLOGY SURVEILLANCE REPORT NORTHEAST REGION FALL Namitha Reddy Regional Coordinator North/Central West Region NJDOH/EEOH/CDS

An Introduction to Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya Viruses

Fight the Bite Zika Virus Webinar District of Columbia Department of Health

Risk Factors for West Nile Virus Infection During an Outbreak Arizona, 2010

INFLUENZA IN MANITOBA 2010/2011 SEASON. Cases reported up to January 29, 2011

Massachusetts Arbovirus Surveillance and Response Plan

Review of Influenza Activity in San Diego County

HUMAN DISEASE CAUSING VIRUSES VECTORED BY MOSQUITOES

Outbreak Response/Epidemiology Influenza Weekly Report Arkansas

The Moreno Valley Fire Department Offers The Following Water Safety Information:

Measles: United States, January 1 through June 10, 2011

Situation update pandemic (H1N1) 2009

INFLUENZA Surveillance Report Influenza Season

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES WITH GLOBAL IMPACT

Dengue Fever & Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Annual Reports to WHO

Selassie AW (DPHS, MUSC) 1

Infectious Diseases-HAI, Infectious Diseases Arizona Department of Health Services, Public Health Services. Phoenix, Arizona. Assignment Description

WEST NILE VIRUS SUMMARY REPORT 2017 SEASON UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Transcription:

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County Culex larvae found collecting in standing water Image by CDC/James Gathany - License: Public Domain. Maricopa County Department of Public Health Office of Epidemiology June 211 January 1, 21 December 31, 21

Commentary West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne virus that causes a non-specific, selflimited, febrile illness. Mosquitoes become infected when they feed on infected birds that have migrated into an area. The mosquitoes then bite people who may or may not become infected. The cycle of WNV occurs at an unusually high intensity when there is both a large number of infected birds and a high concentration of infected mosquitoes in a relatively small geographic area. Mosquitoes are the known carriers (vectors) of the virus from the host birds to humans. Humans and animals (i.e., horses) are incidental hosts in this birdmosquito cycle, and thus cannot pass the virus to others. Because WNV causes death in birds, we expect dead birds to be the first warning of WNV activity in an area. WNV is widespread in Africa, North America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Southeast Asia, Australia, the Caribbean and Central and South America. Although it is now widespread in the United States, WNV was not present in Arizona until 23. WNV is now endemic in Maricopa County and is expected to be a public health concern indefinitely. WNV surveillance season begins April 1st and ends November th, however, in Arizona the majority of cases occur between the months of June and October, with cases as early as January and as late as November. All residents and visitors are urged to continue to take precautions against WNV infection every year. The Maricopa County Department of Public Health (MCDPH) and the Maricopa County Department of Environmental Services (MCDES) work closely to educate and protect the residents of Maricopa County against WNV. MCDES has an extensive mosquito-trapping program that enables staff to identify areas where there is a lot of mosquito activity and to detect mosquito-borne diseases. Various types of mosquito traps are set up throughout the county to collect mosquitoes for testing. These mosquitoes are pooled together, by species, into groups of 1-5 mosquitoes. This collection of mosquitoes is called a mosquito pool. The mosquitoes are then ground up and tested for WNV and other mosquito-borne diseases. MCDES responds to complaints regarding green (unattended) swimming pools, stagnant water, dead birds, and mosquitoes. MCDPH is responsible for the interaction of the virus with humans. Working with hospitals and medical providers throughout the county, Public Health conducts disease surveillance to find hot spots in the Valley where there are a particularly high number of people with WNV. MCDPH nurses and epidemiologists monitor patients with potential WNV symptoms who seek medical care, monitor disease patterns in order to stop - 2 -

transmission of the virus, and assist the public by giving recommendations for controlling the spread of or exposure to WNV in many different settings. The majority (~8%) of people infected with WNV will show no symptoms at all. For those that are symptomatic (~2%), symptoms will appear 2-14 days after receiving the mosquito bite. Symptomatic cases are characterized by the acute onset of fever, headache, arthralgias, myalgias, and sometimes accompanied by a maculopapular rash or lymphadenopathy. Rarely do symptoms get more severe; however, 1-3% of symptomatic infections will develop into a neuroinvasive form of the disease. In neuroinvasive West Nile virus, the central nervous system (CNS) is involved and clinical syndromes ranging from meningitis (inflammation of the lining of the brain and spinal cord) to encephalitis (inflammation of the brain), or acute paralysis can occur. There is no treatment for WNV; only supportive care can be given. Between January 1, 21 and December 31, 21, the MCDPH received reports of 126 residents infected with WNV, 115 of whom developed symptoms, and 12 of whom died from the disease. This was the second highest year for West Nile cases in Maricopa County ever recorded, but was still substantially lower than the 355 cases reported in 24. This represents a substantial increase in cases from the 19 cases reported in 29. It should be noted that the 29 season coincided with the increase in summer influenza cases during the H1N1 influenza pandemic, and therefore fewer WNV cases may have been detected and/or reported. The 21 WNV season was unusual as there were a high number of cases and mosquito positives reported early in the summer (mostly in July) from residents and mosquito pools in the East Valley. This intense, localized transmission of WNV was unlike transmission patterns seen from 25 to 29, which typically showed the peak number of cases and positives being reported in late August to September throughout Maricopa County (Figure 1). This focus of transmission occurred while there was minimal WNV activity throughout the rest of the United States. MCDPH and ADHS requested assistance from the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) to define the size and scope of the outbreak, identify modifiable risk factors for WNV infection, and determine prevention techniques and messages to help curtail the outbreak. Reports on the findings from the CDC s investigation are forthcoming. The following pages summarize the incidence of WNV cases in humans by age, gender, case classification and by city of residence. In addition, WNV surveillance indicators and data on mosquito pools are also summarized. - 3 -

Human Cases Figure 1. WNV Cases in Humans in Maricopa County by Month of Onset, 25-21 45 4 35 25 (n=7) 26 (n=75) 27 (n=68) 28 (n=91) 29 (n=19) 21 (n=115) 25 2 15 1 5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month - 4 -

Human Cases WNV Positive Mosquito Pools Figure 2. WNV Cases in Humans and WNV Positive Mosquito Pools in Maricopa County by Month, 21 45 7 Human Cases¹ (n=115) Mosquito Pools² (n=163) 4 6 35 5 25 4 2 15 2 1 5 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month 3 1 A human case is an individual infected with WNV and with a clinically compatible illness. 2 Mosquito pools are a collection of mosquitoes that have been collected from a county trap that are pooled together, by species, into groups of 1-5 mosquitoes and then ground up and tested for WNV. 3 Human data are based on the date of symptom onset. Mosquito data are based on date specimen was collected. Since WNV has an incubation period ranging from 2-14 days, it is expected that there will be a lag between mosquito positives and human case onsets. - 5 -

Figure 3. West Nile Virus Surveillance Indicators: Dates of First Positive Findings in a Mosquito Pool and Onset in a Human in Maricopa County, 211* 5/25/1 Mosquito January February March April May June July August September October November December 6/1/1 Human *Reports from previous years have included the first positive equine. In 21, no horses tested positive for WNV in Maricopa County. - 6 -

Table 1. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Gender and Case Classification, 21 Case Classification 1 WNV Cases Male Female Total % of Total Cases Meningitis 17 18 35 % Encephalitis 2 1 26% Paralysis Syndrome 3 1 4 3% Neuroinvasive Disease Total 4 29 69 6% Fever 19 8 27 23% Fever in a viremic donor 2 4 2 6 5% Unspecified 3 2 4 6 5% Unspecified in a viremic donor 3,4 2 5 7 6% Non-Neuroinvasive Total 27 19 46 4% Total Number of Cases 67 48 115 1% Viremic Donors Asymptomatic 5 5 6 11-1 Case Classification may differ from the numbers reported by Arizona Department of Health Services. 2 Fever in a viremic donor cases are included in fever cases throughout the rest of this report. 3 In 21, MCDPH expanded the interpretation of the WNV case definition to include mild cases of illness without fever, captured in the Unspecified category. 4 Unspecified in a viremic donor cases are included in fever cases throughout the rest of this report. 5 Fever, fever in a viremic donor, unspecified, unspecified in a viremic donor are included in nonneuroinvasive cases throughout the rest of this report. Case Classifications: The Maricopa County Department of Public Health uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention s (CDC) case definition to confirm a case of West Nile virus. CDC case definitions are reviewed and modified as more information is learned about the disease. Since WNV is a relatively new disease, changes to the WNV case definition are common. A case of WNV is a clinically compatible illness with supporting laboratory evidence. Cases of WNV are classified either as neuroinvasive or non-neuroinvasive, which are explained below. WNV infection can also be asymptomatic or result in a febrile illness of variable severity sometimes associated with CNS involvement. Non-Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus: Requires, at minimum, the presence of documented fever, as measured by the patient or clinician, the absence of neuroinvasive disease, and the absence of a more likely clinical explanation for the illness. - 7 -

o Fever: A non-localized, self-limited febrile illness characterized by the acute onset of fever, headache, arthralgias, myalgias, and sometimes accompanied by a maculopapular rash or lymphadenopathy. o Unspecified: A non-localized, self-limited illness with the same symptoms as listed (above) for fever, but in the absence of a fever. (This was a new classification category for the 21 season). Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus: Requires the presence of fever, the absence of a more likely clinical explanation for the illness, and at least one of the following documented by a physician: 1. Acutely altered mental status (e.g., disorientation, obtundation, stupor, or coma) 2. Acute signs of central or peripheral neurologic dysfunction (e.g., paresis or paralysis, nerve palsies, sensory deficits, abnormal reflexes, generalized convulsions, or abnormal movements) 3. Pleocytosis (increased white blood cell concentration in cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) associated with illness clinically compatible with meningitis (e.g., headache or stiff neck) Neuroinvasive cases are classified using the following categories: o Meningitis: WNV meningitis is characterized by fever, headache, stiff neck, and pleocytosis. o Encephalitis: WNV encephalitis is characterized by fever, headache, and altered mental status ranging from confusion to coma with or without additional signs of brain dysfunction (e.g., paresis or paralysis, cranial nerve palsies, sensory deficits, abnormal reflexes, generalized convulsions, and abnormal movements). o Paralysis syndrome: No CDC case definition for this syndrome exists at the present time. The criteria applied to Maricopa County cases are: Laboratory confirmed acute WNV-infection; AND Physician documented acute paralysis. Viremic Donor: The CDC defines a WNV positive viremic donor as a person who donated blood and had a positive test when screened for the presence of West Nile - 8 -

virus. Viremic donors are followed up by the blood agency to verify their infection with additional tests. Some viremic donors will remain asymptomatic, but others will go on to develop symptoms. o Asymptomatic Viremic Donor: Viremic donors who do not become symptomatic are not included in case numbers. The criteria applied to Maricopa County cases are: Laboratory confirmed acute WNV-infection; AND No report of symptoms. o Symptomatic Viremic Donor: Once the symptoms are reviewed, the case will be classified as a confirmed case of viremic donor encephalitis, Viremic donor meningitis, Viremic donor paralysis syndrome, Viremic donor fever, or Viremic donor unspecified. The criteria applied to Maricopa County cases are: Laboratory confirmed acute WNV-infection; AND A report of symptoms compatible with West Nile Fever, meningitis, encephalitis, paralysis syndrome, or unspecified (see above definitions). For more information visit: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/clinicians/surveillance.htm#casedef http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/oids/pdf/casedefinitions.pdf - 9 -

Number of Cases Figure 4. West Nile Virus Human Cases in Maricopa County by Gender and Case Classification, 21 (n=115) 4 Female Male 35 35 33 25 2 15 13 1 5 4 Meningitis Encephalitis Paralysis Syndrome Fever Unspecified Case Classification - 1 -

Number of Cases Figure 5. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Case Classification, 26-21 8 7 26 (n=75) 27 (n=68) 28 (n=91) 29 (n=19) 21 (n=115) 69 6 5 46 55 4 35 36 4 38 2 1 7 12 Non-neuroinvasive Case Classification Neuroinvasive - 11 -

Number of Deaths Table 2. Mean, Median, and Range of Ages of West Nile Virus Deaths and Survivors in Maricopa County, 21 (n=115) Mean Age Median Age Age Range Died (n=12) 66.3 67.5 32-89 Survived (n=13) 51. 5. 1-85 Total 52.6 51. 1-89 Figure 6. West Nile Virus Deaths in Maricopa County by Gender, 26-21 (n=28) 14 Male (n=2) Female (n=8) 12 12 1 8 6 6 6 4 4 2 26 27 28 29 21 Year - 12 -

Number of Cases Table 3. Mean, Median, and Range of Ages of West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County, 21 (n=115) Mean Age Median Age Age Range Non-neuroinvasive 49.9 49. 1-8 Neuroinvasive 54.4 1 54. 14-89 Total 52.6 51. 1-89 1 Mean age of West Nile virus non-neuroinvasive cases vs. neuroinvasive cases was not significantly different, p=<.5 Figure 7. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Age and Case Classification, 21 (n=115) 28 Non-neuroinvasive (n=46) Neuroinvasive (n=69) 25 25 2 15 16 16 1 11 1 5 3 6-17 18-29 -39 4-49 5-59 6-69 7-79 8+ Age (Years) - 13 -

Mean Age (Years) Figure 8. Mean Ages in Years of West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Case Classification, 26-21 7 Non-neuroinvasive Neuroinvasive 6 58.6 56.4 58.5 59.3 53.8 54.4 5 5.1 48. 48.8 49.9 4 2 1 26 27 28 29 21 Year - 14 -

Figure 9. Rates of West Nile Virus in Maricopa County by City, 21. 2. 4. 6. 8. 1. 12. 14. 16. 18. Chandler 4.66 Gilbert 14.87 Glendale 1.32 Mesa 6.15 City 1 Peoria Phoenix.76 3.25 Queen Creek 17.12 Scottsdale 5.98 Surprise Tempe 3.4 3.71 Rate per 1, Population 2 1 Population statistics for each city were obtained from United States Census Bureau 21 Census. 2 Rate per 1, population = (N/population) * 1,. - 15 -

Figure 1. Rates of West Nile Virus in Maricopa County by City 1, 26-21 16. Rate per 1, Population 1 14. 12. 1. 8. 6. 4. 26 27 28 29 21 2.. Chandler Glendale Gilbert Mesa Peoria Phoenix Scottsdale Tempe Total³ City 2 1 Rates shown for the top 8 cities by population in Maricopa County. 2 Rate per 1, population = (N/population) * 1,. 3 Cities population statistics for each city were obtained from United States Census Bureau 26, 27, 28, and 29 estimates and from the 21 Census. 4 Total includes cities displayed in figure, as well as other cities and unincorporated areas with <5 cases. - 16 -