Class I. Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment for Arch Development. Clinician: Dr. Stuart Frost, Phoenix, AZ Patient: A.M.

Similar documents
Arch Development: Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence Jeff Kozlowski, DDS East Lyme, CT

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

3D CONTROL HAS ARRIVED

New Class of Appliance

BEGIN WITH THEEND IN MIND: Bracket Placement and Early Elastics Protocols for Smile Arc Protection. 4 ci VOL 17 NO

The Rondeau System. Brackets, Bands, Buccal Tubes and Archwires. Orthodontic supplies recommended by Dr. Brock Rondeau

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Delta Force. Bracket System. Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

SE NiTi Heat Activated NiTi Ultra T Heat Activated NiTi Stainless Steel Beta Titanium. Ultra T Archwires

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

Virtual Treatment Planning

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

CREATING CLINICAL SUCCESS

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Orthos Article Revisited: Practice Efficiency & Profitability

Advantages. Fantastic. systems. Together with Unitek Lateral Development Archwires, this system puts you in control to

Advantages. Fantastic. Treatment. Finishes. 3M Self-Ligating Appliances Lateral Development System. Unitek Lateral Development Archwires

ARCHWIRE. An extensive selection of high quality wire types and arch forms WIRE PRODUCTS. Wires. TruFlex Nickel Titanium Archwire. TruFlex.

SnapLink Re-Convertible Tube

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Archwire Insertion and Disengagement Instruments Technique Guide

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

Victory Series Active Self-Ligating Brackets. Reliable. and. Effective

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

The Science Behind The System Clinical Abstracts, Volume 2

Plus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

The management of impacted

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

The FARRELL BENT WIRE System

Introducing the Clarity SL Self-Ligating Appliance System

3M Incognito Appliance System extraction case study.

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

04 Inserting the HYCON TUBE

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Bracket Systems. A good bracket is the foundation of a good treatment plan... Go ahead, choose the best. Metal Bracket.

LINGUAL STRAIGHTWIRE BRACKET SYSTEM Designed with Drs. Kyoto Takemoto and Giuseppe Scuzzo

TOL

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Simply Great Wire! Great prices.

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

GAC Archwire Collection

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion with Class I Molars Due to Blocked In Lower Second Premolars

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

Clarity. Esthetic Orthodontic Solutions. 3M Clarity Ultra Self-Ligating Brackets Practice confidently. Smile beautifully.

A lingual orthodontic case with 3M Incognito Appliance System combined with orthognathic surgery.

Correction of a maxillary canine-first premolar transposition using mini-implant anchorage

For many years, patients with

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Bands and Attachments

Clinical tips to increase consistency using a Straight-Wire Appliance

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Lower Anterior Crowding Correction by a Convenient Lingual Methodjerd_

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

What Happens When No Space Maintainer Was Used

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

Interdisciplinary management of Impacted teeth in an adult with Orthodontics & Free Gingival graft : A Case Report

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

wiirre e a a n n d d w wiirre e ffo orrms ms

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

Transcription:

Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment for Arch Development Class I End-to-End Molar Clinician: Dr. Stuart Frost, Phoenix, AZ Patient: A.M. Pretreatment Diagnosis Class I (end-to-end molar on right), female patient, 38 years old, presented inquiring about clear aligner treatment. She had had orthodontic treatment by another clinician years before. I had treated both of her children with the Damon System and she had been pleased with the results. Given that her chief concerns were the crowding in her lower arch and the widening of her smile, I was able to convince her that passive self-ligation would offer her the results she wanted and could satisfy her need for an esthetic option with Damon Clear, which was then in prototype form. She had no jaw popping or clicking. Facial/Soft Tissue/Macroesthetics Mildly convex profile with a mildly convex nasolabial angle. Slight lip strain when lips were at rest with lower midline shifted to the right. Smile/Miniesthetics Initial Excessive gingival display in the maxilla, narrow arches with 3 to 4 mm of crowding in the lower arch and 1 to 2 mm of crowding in the upper arch. Consonant smile arc. Teeth/Microesthetics Esthetically-shaped teeth in both arches and excellent hygiene. Inconsistent gingival architecture in the lower anteriors and upper R3. Appliances Used Damon Clear Prototype Damon Q 9

Treatment Objectives and Plan Treat nonextraction, eliminating the crowding by widening the arches, using the Damon Clear prototype brackets U3-3 and Damon Q elsewhere. Employ variable torque to foster the proper inclinations in the anterior teeth and Dr. Tom Pitts s bracket positioning to maintain the smile arc. Treatment Sequence Damon Clear/DQ Variable Torques Employed U1s: Standard torque (+15) U2s: Low torque (-5 ) U3s: Standard torque (+7 ) L2s: Low torque (-11 ) LL3: Super torque (+13 ) LR3: Standard torque (+7 ) Bonding U/L: Direct-bonded 7-7, engaging.014 round Damon Optimal Force Copper Ni-Ti 1 archwires. U: Placed a stop between U1s. 1 Month 1st Visit U: Transitioned to a.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire. Ligature-tied U2-2. Added a stop distal to UR1. L: Transitioned to a.018 round CuNi-Ti archwire. U/L: Started Quail, 3/16, 2 oz., Shorty CL II elastics (bilaterally L6 to U4, full-time), maintaining them throughout treatment. 1 Month 1 All Copper Ni-Ti wire used is Damon Optimal Force Copper Ni-Ti. 10

1.5 Months 2nd Visit U: Transitioned to a.018 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire. Maintained ligature ties U2-2 and moved the stops between U1s and between UL1-2. Positioning of the stops is at the assistant s discretion. L: Transitioned to a.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire. Ligature-tied L3-3, maintaining it throughout treatment. U/L: Maintained Shorty CL II elastics. 1.5 Months 3 Months 3rd Visit U: Repositioned the UR3 and dropped the wire size to a.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire. Maintained ligature ties U2-2 and moved stops mesial and distal to UR1. L: Maintained the.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire and ligature ties L3-3. U/L: Maintained Shorty CL II elastics. 3 Months 11

4.5 Months 4th Visit U: Transitioned to a.018 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire and maintained ligature ties U2-2. Removed all stops. L: Maintained the.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire and ligature ties L3-3. U/L: Maintained Shorty CL II elastics. 4.5 Months 5.5 Months 5th Visit U: Maintained the.018 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire. Ligature-tied U3-3. L: Maintained the.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti archwire and ligature ties L3-3. U/L: Took interim panograph and repositioned UR4, LR1 and LR3. The repositionings were minor so did not have to reduce the wire dimensions. Maintained Shorty CL II elastics. 5.5 Months 12

6.5 Months 6th Visit U: Transitioned to a.019 x.025 TMA archwire, adding 15 of buccal crown torque to the UL3, maintaining ligature ties U3-3. L: Transitioned to a.017 x.025 TMA archwire and put a step-up bend in the LR4. Maintained ligature ties L3-3. U/L: Maintained Shorty CL II elastics, but transitioned to nighttime only. 7.25 Months 7th Visit U: Maintained the.019 x.025 TMA archwire, putting a step-down bend UL1. Maintained ligature ties U3-3. L: Maintained the.017 x.025 TMA archwire and ligature ties L3-3. U/L: Maintained Shorty CL II elastics. 7.25 Months 13

7.75 Months Final Visit, 35 weeks 7 Treatment Appointments, 2 Emergency Visits U/L: Removed all appliances. Shaped and polished the teeth. Took impressions for 1 mm Essix-formed clear overlay U/L retainers. Bonded permanent retainer U2-2, just on the 2s, starting at the UR2, shaping the wire tooth by tooth using.016 x.022 Bond-a-Braid lingual retainer wire (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL). Bonded lower retainer, every tooth, L3-3 using an.026 stainless steel wire, forming looping bends on each end. The lower fixed retainer is to be bonded for life. If the upper fixed retainer comes loose after 18 months, we rebond it if the patient originally had 3-4 mm or more of spacing pretreatment. Two weeks later, took final records and delivered clear retainers. 7.75 Months - Treatment Complete 14

Case Discussion We achieved all treatment objectives and satisfied the patient s chief concerns. Interestingly, widening the patient s transverse arch width, especially the U2-2, had the added benefit of diminishing the excess upper gingival display. In this case and others, I began experimenting with using #4 test fishing line rather than ligature wire to consolidate teeth. It has proven to work effectively and since it is clear, it is more appealing to patients. While the patient had originally inquired about clear aligner treatment, the fee would have been substantially more and would not have allowed us to reach her objectives. While clear aligner treatment can satisfy the objectives of certain adult cases, esthetic fixed appliance treatment allows us to achieve outstanding results. What I Would Do Differently Today The patient had a lateral tongue thrust at the UR3, which plagued me throughout treatment. Were I to treat the case today, I would place lingual tongue reminders in the LR3 that would likely have resulted in a more satisfactory Class I right cuspid relationship. Initial Final Arch Development 15

Wire Sequence Chart Clinician: Dr. Stuart Frost, Phoenix, AZ Patient: A.M. Maxillary Hardware Mandibular Hardware Herbst/Elastics 0 Weeks 4 Weeks 8 Weeks 12 Weeks 16 Weeks 20 Weeks 22 Weeks 24 Weeks 28 Weeks 32 Weeks 34 Weeks 38 Weeks START.014 CuNi-Ti.014 CuNi-Ti.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti.018 CuNi-Ti Quail, 3/16, 2 oz., Shorty CL II Elastics, L6 to U4.018 x.025 CuNi-Ti.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti.014 x.025 CuNi-Ti.018 x.025 CuNi-Ti.019 x.025 TMA, adding 15 of buccal crown torque UL3.017 x.025 TMA FINISH 16