NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF COCOA

Similar documents
Use of Indigofera zollingeriana as Forage Protein Source in Dairy Goat Ration

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

Prospects of Palm Kernel Cake. use in Cattle Feed

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

The Effects of Different Silage Additives on in vitro Gas Production, Digestibility and Energy Values of Sugar Beet Pulp Silage

Established Facts. Impact of Post Harvest Forage on the Rumen Function. Known Facts. Known Facts

Feedstuff NE l content calculation 5 steps : STEP 1

P. Namanee, S. Kuprasert and W. Ngampongsai. Abstract

VMIC 2017 The Veterinary Medicine International Conference 2017 Volume 2017

MOLASSES AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTATION OF AMMONIATED HAY FOR YEARLING CATTLE

Effects of a sequential offer of hay and TMR on feeding and rumination behaviour of dairy cows

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

Assessing Your J Grennan & Sons Silage Report.

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

MODIFICATION OF FORAGE QUALITY POST-HARVEST

Defining Forage Quality 1

Feed production technology on smallholder dairy farms

Lamb Weaning and Nutrition

RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER

ALMLM HAY QUALITY: TERMS AND DEFIN"IONS

Dry Cow Nutrition. Jersey conference Brazil

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

Effects of Feeding Urea and Soybean Meal-Treated Rice Straw on Digestibility of Feed Nutrients and Growth Performance of Bull Calves

URGENT NEWS. Grass Silage Update No 144: Grass Silage Update /2011. Fermentation quality and intake characteristics

EFFECT OF A REVALOR-G IMPLANT AND SOURCE OF SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN ON WEIGHT GAIN OF STEERS WINTERED ON DORMANT TALLGRASS PRAIRIE OR OLD WORLD BLUESTEM

NEW/EMERGING MEASUREMENTS FOR FORAGE QUALITY. Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Normand St-Pierre The Ohio State University. Copyright 2011 Normand St-Pierre, The Ohio State University

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

DDGS FEEDING TRIAL ON DAIRY CATTLE IN INDONESIA

Reducing the reliance on purchased protein. Improving the value of home grown proteins

Protein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1

N 18.5

Silage from Agricultural By-products in Thailand: Processing and Storage

Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective

EFFECT OF LEVELS OF LUCERNE STRAW IN TOTAL MIXED RATION ON NUTRIENT INTAKE AND DIGESTIBILITY IN BULLOCKS

Milk production on grass silage and cereals only

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ADDITIVES ON SILAGE QUALITY OF NAPIERGRASS. Y.K.Cheng, C.S. Chen and P.W. Peng

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

Nutritive Value of Feeds

Response of Growing Calves Fed graded Levels of Farm Kernel Meal as Nitrogen Source. By: *Gidado, A. S., **Nasiru M. and **Haruna, U.

Dr. Dan Undersander Professor of Agronomy University of Wisconsin

Feeding strategy for small and medium scale rabbit units

Siti Chuzaemi, Mashudi, Marjuki, Asri Nurul Huda Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Brawijaya Malang, East Java, Indonesia

(Equation 1) (Equation 2) (Equation 3)

COMPARATIVE FEED VALUE OF WHOLE PLANT CORN PRE AND POST GRAZING. October 17, 2012

ID # IMPROVING THE FEEDING VALUE OF COTTON STALK, WHEAT STRAW AND RICE STRAW WITH OZONATION. Hokkaido, JAPAN,

Prediction of the energy and protein value of DDGS for cattle

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

EVOL VING FORAGE QUALITY CONCEPTS

Abstract. Keywords: Tropical grasses, Degradability, Nutrient, Rumen fermentation. Introduction. Chaowarit Mapato a* and Metha Wanapat a

EFFECT OF MOLASSES AND CORN AS SILAGE ADDITIVES ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTT DWARF ELEPHANT GRASS SILAGE AT DIFFERENT FERMENTATION PERIODS

U S C on, hns Jo a elin C

ABSTRACT FORAGE SAMPLING AND TESTING ACCURACY CHOOSING A FORAGE TESTING LAB

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

2017 WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA CORN SILAGE VARIETY TEST REPORT

EFFECT OF WHEAT BRAN SUBSTITUTION FOR CORN AND DEHYDRATED ALFALFA ON FINISHING LAMBS. Abstract

Forage Testing and Supplementation

Supplementation for the Cow-Calf Calf Producer

Study on the Chemical Composition, Intake and Digestibility of Maize Stover, Tef Straw and Haricot Bean Haulms in Adami Tulu District, Ethiopia

Nutritional evaluation of Erianthus spp., Saccharum spontaneum, and Saccharum spp. hybrids as feed

2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania

Protein requirements of beef cattle fed palm oil by-products in the South-Thailand

Fibre is complicated! NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports NDF. Review. NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin

Feeding and Managing Cows in Warm Weather 1

Feeding the Doe Herd. Lyle W. McNichol PAg. Lyle McNichol Livestock Consulting Services

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

Feed. The major cost of animal production

Potential of Chemically Treated Corn Stover and Modified Distiller Grains as a Partial Replacement for Corn Grain in Feedlot Diets

Feeding DDGS to Livestock and Poultry. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

Overview of Production and Nutrient Content of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

PERFORMANCE OF CALVES FED WITH HAY, SILAGE AND BROWSE PLANT AS FEED SUPPLEMENT DURING THE DRY SEASON

Potential Benefits from the Utilization of Some Natural Feed Resources in Thai Swamp Buffaloes

Know Your Feed Terms. When you are talking nutrition and feeds with your

Effect Of Partial Replacement Of Berseem Hay By Ensiled And Dried Sugar Beet Tops On Performance Of Growing Rabbits

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

How Fiber Digestibility Affects Forage Quality and Milk Production

Using dietary crude protein to manipulate energy balance in early lactation dairy cows

104 Trop Anim Prod :2

Calcium Oxide and Calcium Hydroxide Treatment of Corn Silage

HIGH FIBRE CONCENTRATES FOR COWS ON PASTURE

Evaluating by-products for inclusion in ruminant and monogastric diets

Hay for Horses: the good, the bad and the ugly

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROSOPIS JULIFLORA PODS FOR SHEEP M. Chellapandian 1* and D. Thirumeignanam 2

Nutrition Exercise 3/30/2015. Workshop #12. What are we going to feed? How do we find the most economical feeding option? Who do we need to feed?

Using Feed Analysis to Troubleshoot Nutritional Problems in Dairy Herds 1

Effect of Moisture Content and Storage Time on Sweet Corn Waste Silage Quality

Mardiati Zain,J. Rahman, Khasrad. Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Andalas University, Padang - Indonesia

The Rumen Inside & Out

Forage and feed analysis. Methods available and differences

IN SITU RUMEN DEGRADATION KINETICS OF FOUR SORGHUM VARIETIES IN NILI RAVI BUFFALOES ABSTRACT

Beef Cattle Handbook

Reproductive efficiency Environment 120 Low P ( ) High P ( ) ays

Fundamentals of Ration Balancing for Beef Cattle Part II: Nutrient Terminology

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle E-974

Evaluating Feed Purchasing Options: Energy, Protein, and Mineral Supplements

product feeds contain highly digestible fiber, which could potentially provide an alternative

Performance of Growing Black Bengal Goat Fed Compound Pellet of Different Diameters

Transcription:

NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF COCOA PODS AS RUMINANT FEEDSTUFF Dr. Despal Bogor Agricultural University Indonesia

Background Content Ruminants figure Problem of ruminant development Role of cocoa pods in securing feed for ruminant Constrain of byproduct as ruminant feed Nutrient content of cocoa pod Chemical composition antinutrition Cellwall constituent Digestibility and metabolisable energy Optimum level of ureaapplication application Conclusion

Ruminant Figure Milk consumption COUNTRY CONSUMPTION (liter/capita/year ) China 5 Indonesia 7 Cambodia 13 Philippines 20 Malaysia 20 Singapore 21 Thailand 20 India 30 Bangladesh 31 Japan 40

Ruminant Figure 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 Import Domestik Demand of ruminant product and the ability of domestic production 2006 (ton) 0 milk meat 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 Milk meat 200000 100000 Rate of milk and meat production 0 (ton) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Problem of ruminant development in Indonesia Feeding Problem: Lack of good quality feed resources suboptimum of byproduct utilization Breeding problem Breeding stock uneconomic Limited availability of high quality bull slow breed quality improvement Low reproduction efficiency Disease problem Socio economic problem

Feeding Problem Tropical vs temperate forage quality Grade Chemical composition DMD (%) CP ADF NDF Prime >19 <31 <40 >65 1 17-19 31-35 40-46 62-65 2 14-16 36-40 47-53 58-61 3 11-13 41-42 54-60 56-57 4 8-10 43-45 61-65 53-55 5 <8 >45 >65 <53

Nutrient contents of forages Forage DM, % % DM TDN CP CF Ca P Ash Napier grass 17 52 8 32 04 0.4 03 0.3 12 Native grass 20 55 10 30 0.4 0.2 11 Banana leaf 10 60 9 22 0.7 0.2 12 Corn-stover 20 60 9 25 0.3 0.2 10 Fluctuation availability and quality

BYPRODUCT UTILISATION AS FEEDSTUFF COCOA POD 2 X seed production Palatable High cellwall content Low protein content Animal Feedstuff

Previous results simple chemical treatment with urea as effective as biological treatment in improving cocoa pods qualities

Treatments Untreated Experiment Silage U10 = urea 10 g/kg cocoa pods U20 = urea 20 g/kg cocoa pods U30 = urea uea30 g/kg g cocoa pods Parameters Nutrient content Cellwall constituents Antinutrition Digestibility andmetabolisable energy

Nutrient content of cocoa pod Parameter Untreated Silage U10 U20 U30 DM, % 87.65 89.44 88.88 88.06 87.96 ASH, %DM 7.88 b 6.19 a 6.32 ab 5.81 a 5.49 a CP, %DM 934 9.34 b 868 8.68 ab 19.36 c 26.51 d 43.24 e Total N, % DM 1.35 a 1.69 a 2.90 b 3.98 c 6.77 d True protein N, % DM 1.28 a 1.21 a 1.73 b 1.93 c 2.04 d Amino acids N, % DM 0.78 1.11 nd 0.83 nd CPA = Cocoa pod ash. The cocoa pod was incubated anaerobically for 2 weeks except for fresh treatment. Different superscript at the same column shows the statistically different at p < 0.05

Nutrient content of cocoa pod Parameter Cellwall constituent Untreated Silage U10 U20 U30 CF, % DM 52.30 c 42.09 a 47.18 bc 49.98b c 46.83 b ADF, % DM 69.52 b 62.15 ab 61.39 ab 62.13 ab 58.61 a NDF, % DM 79.48 82.04 82.59 81.92 80.07 ADL, % DM 29.08 a 34.82 b 29.33 a 29.87 a 27.73 a Hemi cellulose, % DM 15.85 16.47 22.08 21.26 22.72 Cellulose. % DM 34.54 b 30.76 a 31.18 ab 30.79 a 29.62 a Crude lignin, % DM 28.64 33.13 29.17 29.66 27.40 CPA = Cocoa pod ash. The cocoa pod was incubated anaerobically for 2 weeks except for fresh treatment. Different superscript at the same column shows the statistically different at p < 0.05

Anti nutrition of cocoa pod Theobro omine (% DM) 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 004 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 C U0 U1 U2 U3 Treatments

Digestibilities and metabolisable energy of cocoa pod Treatments Gb OMD ME ME(r) ml/200 mg DM % MJ/kg DM MJ/kg DM roughage Untreated 9.41 c 32.61 ab 3.40 b 4.03 b Silage 11.51 d 33.04 ab 364 3.64 b 427 4.27 c U10 12.07 d 38.43 c 4.45 c 4.95 d U20 12.99 d 42.13 d 5.08 d 5.48 e U30 4.86 a 42.07 d 5.06 d 5.31 e

Optimum Urea utilization on cocoa pod quality improvement No Formula Peak n r 2 F Based on Gb U (g/kg DM) 1 Gb = 11.0306 + 0.067U 0.0005U 2 67 12 0.86 0.000 Based on %TP (TP-N x 6.25) 2 OMD = 33.4659 + 0.07430743 U - 0.00040004 U 2 93 12 084 0,84 0.000000 3 ME = 4.3889 + 0.0113 U - 0.00006 U 2 94 12 0.84 0.000 Based on (NAN UR-N) x 6.25 4 OMD = 34.3873 + 0.0401 U - 0.0003 U 2 67 12 0.75 0.000 5 ME = 4.5191 + 0.0065 U - 0.00005 U 2 65 12 072 0.72 0.000000

The effect of urea application on cocoa pods digestibility 38 13 OMD (%) 36 34 32 11 9 7 5 Gb b(ml)/me(mj J/kg DM) 30 3 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Urea (g/kg DM) 180 200 DOM-TP DOM-(NAN-UN) ME-TP ME-(NAN-UN) Gb

Conclusion Ensilage and urea treatments improve the nutritive value of cocoa pods U20 resulted better improvement compare to others The optimum level lfor urea application i about 65 g urea/kg DM