Supplementary Online Content

Similar documents
Supplementary Material

Background and Analysis Objectives Methods and Approach

Background. Abstinence rates associated with varenicline

Supplementary Online Content

Pharmacotherapy for Tobacco Dependence Treatment

SWITCH Trial. A Sequential Multiple Adaptive Randomization Trial

Does cigarette reduction while using nicotine replacement predict quitting? Observational evidence from the Rapid Reduction Trial

Randomized controlled trial of physical activity counseling as an aid to smoking cessation: 12 month follow-up

Presenter, Tulsi Jose, MD

Impacts of Early Exposure to Work on Smoking Initiation Among Adolescents and Older Adults: the ADD Health Survey. David J.

EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS TO HELP PATIENTS QUIT TOBACCO

Gender Differences in Use of Smoking Cessation Services and Resources: A Real-World Study of Ontario Smokers

The Effect of Five Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies on Smoking Cessation Milestones

Declaration of Conflict of Interest. No potential conflict of interest to disclose with regard to the topics of this presentations.

Supplementary Online Content

Rates and Predictors of Renewed Quitting After Relapse During a One-Year Follow-Up Among Primary Care Patients

BIOSTATISTICAL METHODS

Menthol Cigarettes, Smoking Cessation, Atherosclerosis and Pulmonary Function

Optimizing Smoking Cessation within HUD s Proposed Smoke-Free Rule

How to help your patient quit smoking. Christopher M. Johnson MD, PhD

Tobacco smoking is the leading preventable. Varenicline Versus Bupropion SR or Placebo for Smoking Cessation: A Pooled Analysis

Best Practices in Tobacco Treatment IDN

Running head: SENSORY PERCEPTIONS OF NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY BETWEEN MENTHOL AND NONMENTHOL CIGARETTE SMOKERS

Supplementary Online Content

Measure #404: Anesthesiology Smoking Abstinence National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Smoking Cessation A Clinicians Perspective. Jeff Wilson, MD

Effective Treatments for Tobacco Dependence

Psychological mediators of bupropion sustained-release treatment for smoking cessation

Availability, Affordability, and Prices of Smoking Cessation Drugs in 9 Countries: Preliminary Findings

If treatment for tobacco addiction was evidence-based, what would it look like? Robert West University College London YORK, November 2005

The Vancouver General Hospital Smoking Cessation Clinic: Outcomes from a Specialist Cessation Service within Cardiology

Sleep Problems and Smoking Cessation in Women

3. Chantix [package insert]. New York, NY: Pfizer, Inc,; Ramon JM, Morchon S, Baena A, Masuet-Aumatell C. Combining varenicline and nicotine

5. Offer pharmacotherapy to all smokers who are attempting to quit, unless contraindicated.

HIV and Cardiovascular Risk The Ottawa HIV Quit Smoking Study

Smoking and Smoking Cessation in England 2011: Findings from the Smoking Toolkit Study

Workplace Quit Smoking Program 12-month Follow-up Survey:

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

A systems approach to treating tobacco use and dependence

Smoking Status and Body Mass Index in the United States:

Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis (Review)

Evaluation of the Workplace-based Quit Smoking Programs. Intake Survey

Motivating Smoking Cessation: Recognizing and Capitalizing on Teachable Moments

Month/Year of Review: March 2014 Date of Last Review: April 2012

Long-term Nicotine Replacement Therapy A Randomized Clinical Trial

Supplementary Online Content

Searching for phenotypes in smoking cessation treatment

Smoking Reduction is the First Step Towards Smoking Cessation

Sociodemographic predictors of success in smoking intervention

Evidence Based Approaches for Treating the Unmotivated Smoker

Wanting to Get Pregnant

Supplementary Online Content

EliScholar A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale

Clearing the Air: What You Need to Know and Do to Prepare to Quit Smoking

Comparing the Cochrane review of electronic cigarettes to other meta-analyses

Using Stop Smoking Medicines

Supplementary Online Content

Pharmacological Treatments for Tobacco Users with Behavioral Health Conditions

REGIONAL PHARMACY SPECIALIST SMOKING CESSATION SERVICE FEBRUARY A Pharmacist s Guide

Update on Medications for Tobacco Cessation

Daniel Boduszek University of Huddersfield

Appendix 1 This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

The Kentucky Department for Public Health University of Kentucky College of Nursing Local Health Department Tobacco Cessation Survey, 2006

Appendix: Supplementary tables [posted as supplied by author]

Supplementary Online Content

Core Competencies - Smoking Cessation Fundamentals

Despite substantial declines over the past decade,

Tanaffos (2003) 2(6), NRITLD, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Iran

IOWA MEDICAID DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMISSION 100 Army Post Road Des Moines, IA (515) Fax

TWIN VALLEY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF SMOKING CESSATION

The Kentucky Department for Public Health University of Kentucky College of Nursing Local Health Department Tobacco Cessation Survey, 2007

Project TEACH Addressing Tobacco Treatment for Pregnant Women Jan Blalock, Ph.D.

PHARMACOTHERAPY OF SMOKING CESSATION

BIOSTATISTICAL METHODS

Learning Objectives 4/3/2018 UP IN SMOKE: NAVIGATING THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF SMOKING CESSATION BACKGROUND

Trends in electronic cigarette use in England

Quitting patterns and success rates of a tobacco cessation program led by New Mexico Pharmaceutical Care Foundation

Smoking Cessation. Disclosures. Thank You. None

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Randomized Comparative Trial of Nicotine Polacrilex, a Transdermal Patch, Nasal Spray, and an Inhaler

Tanaffos (2002) 1(4), NRITLD, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Iran

Quit Rates of New York State Smokers

Disclaimers. Smoking and Smoking Cessation. Worldwide. Objectives. Statistics at Home. Smoking Epidemic 16/10/2017

The relationship between adherence to clinic appointments and year-one mortality for HIV infected patients at a Referral Hospital in Western Kenya

Counseling the Tobacco Dependent Patient. Gretchen Whitby, CNP The Lung Center

Pharmacotherapy Safety and Efficacy in Adolescent Smoking Cessation

Smoking Cessation: Where Are We Now? Nancy Rigotti, MD

Tobacco Basics and Brief Cessation Interventions. Prepared by: Margie Kvern, RN, MN Diane Mee, RN, BN October 2014

Country profile. Hungary

Quality ID #404: Anesthesiology Smoking Abstinence National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Smoking Cessation. MariBeth Kuntz, PA-C Duke Center for Smoking Cessation

Brief Report Efficacy of Cell Phone Delivered Smoking Cessation Counseling for Persons Living With HIV/AIDS: 3-Month Outcomes

115 remained abstinent. 140 remained abstinent. Relapsed Remained abstinent Total

SMOKING CESSATION WORKSHOP. Dr Mark Palayew December

Nicotine Replacement Therapy and Brief Motivational Interview for Emergency Department Smokers with Asthma

Predictors of Smoking and Quitting Behaviours Among Malaysian Adult Smokers

Best Practice for Smoking Cessation: Pharmacotherapy. Emma Dean Acting Population Health and Health Promotion Coordinator Lead Pharmacist- Smokefree

Transcription:

Supplementary Online Content Baker TB, Piper ME, Stein JH, et al. Effects of nicotine patch vs varenicline vs combination nicotine replacement therapy on smoking cessation at 26 weeks: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.19284 etable 1. Cohort Differences by Sociodemographic and Smoking-Related Variables etable 2. Covariate-Adjusted Logistic Regression Results for Initial Abstinence, Biochemically-Confirmed Abstinence Rates (CO Cutoff=5 ppm), and Prolonged Abstinence by Treatment Condition Contrasts etable 3. Biochemically-Confirmed Abstinence Rates (CO Cutoff=9 ppm) by Treatment Condition etable 4. Cox Regression Survival Analysis of Latency to Relapse in the First Six Months Postquit etable 5. A Priori Covariates and Week 26 Biochemically-Confirmed Point Abstinence (CO Cutoff=5 ppm) by Treatment Group etable 6. Medication Adherence in Past Week at Study Visits This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

etable 1. Cohort Differences by Sociodemographic and Smoking-Related Variables Comparison of Cohorts Categorical Variables, No. (%) Cohort 1 (N=169) Cohort 2 (N=917) P-Value Site, No. (%) from Madison 48 (28.4%) 320 (34.9%).1012 Gender, No. (%) Female 89 (52.7%) 477 (52.0%).8774 Race, No. (%) White 130 (76.9%) 598 (65.2%).0029 Income, No. (%) <$20,0000 24 (15.5%) 321 (36.6%) <.0001 FTND 1 Item 1, No. (%) Smoking Within 30 Min of Waking Home Smoking, No. (%) Yes Prior Use of Cessation Medications b No. (%) Yes Menthol Smoking, No. (%) Yes 133 (80.6%) 703 (76.7%).2659 60 (35.5%) 379 (41.6%).1381 159 (94.1%) 608 (66.3%) <.0001 75 (44.6%) 472 (51.7%).0928 Continuous Variables, Mean (SD) Age (years) 52.6 (9.2) 47.3 (11.9) <.0001 Cigarettes per Day 17.4 (6.8) 17.0 (8.6).5092 FTND a Total Score 4.8 (2.0) 4.8 (2.1).9489 Exhaled Carbon Monoxide (ppm) 15.1 (6.5) 15.1 (8.7).9010 Years Smoked 33.1 (10.4) 27.8 (12.1) <.0001 Likelihood of Quitting Success c 5.7 (1.5) 5.5 (1.7).1409 Note. Cohort differences for categorical variables were tested via chi-square tests; cohort differences for continuous variables were tested with analysis of variance. a FTND=Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence (Heatherton et al, 1991); the FTND ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating a greater severity of nicotine dependence. b Prior Use of Cessation Medications=prior use of varenicline or nicotine patch, gum, or lozenge. c Likelihood of Quitting Success item was rated on 1 to 7 scale (1=not at all; 7=extremely).

etable 2. Covariate-Adjusted Logistic Regression Results for Initial Abstinence, Biochemically-Confirmed Abstinence Rates (CO Cutoff=5 ppm), and Prolonged Abstinence by Treatment Condition Contrasts Post-Quit Abstinence Measure Primary Outcome: Abstinence at 26 Weeks a Initial Covariate-Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Cl) d Patch vs. Patch vs. C-NRT e vs. C-NRT e 1.1 (0.8 to 1.7) 0.8 Abstinence b (0.5 to 1.1) Abstinence at 4 (0.8 to 1.8) Weeks a Abstinence at 12 Weeks a Abstinence at 52 Weeks a Prolonged Abstinence c (26 Weeks) 1.5 ( to 2.3) 9 (0.7 to 1.5) (0.8 to 2.2) ( to 1.9) 1.4 (5 to 2.1) (0.8 to 1.7) ( to 1.9) (0.7 to 1.5) (0.8 to 2.0) (0.6 to ) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) (0.8 to 1.4) ( to 1.7) (0.7 to 1.4) 1.1 (0.8 to 1.7) a Abstinence self-report was biochemically confirmed via exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) testing with abstinence confirmed with a CO value of 5 parts per million (ppm). b Initial abstinence = achieving at least 24 hour of abstinence in the first week of treatment. c Prolonged abstinence = no smoking from Day 7 to Day 181 after the target quit day. d Covariate-adjusted odds ratios based on logistic regression models that included the following binary covariates: Cohort (0=Cohort1, 1=Cohort2), Site (0=Madison, 1=Milwaukee), Gender (0=Female, 1=Male), Race (0=Non-White, 1=White), Income (0=<$20,000, 1= $20,000, FTND Total Score (0=0-4, 1=5-10), Likelihood of Quitting (0=1-5, 1=6-7), Age (0=18-49, 1=50+), Baseline Exhaled Carbon Monoxide (0=5-14, 1=15+0, Home Smoking (0=No, 1=Yes), Prior Use of Cessation Medications (0=No, 1=Yes), Menthol Smoking (0=No, 1=Yes), FTND Item 1 (0=Smoke > 30 Minutes After Waking, 1=Smoke Within 30 Minutes of Waking. e C-NRT = Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy ( and Nicotine Lozenge).

etable 3. Biochemically-Confirmed Abstinence Rates (CO Cutoff=9 ppm) by Treatment Condition Post-Quit Abstinence Measure Treatment Group Abstinence Rates, N Abstinent (%) Abstinence Difference P-Value c Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% Cl) d Nicotine Patch (N=241) (N=424) (N=421) Patch vs. Patch vs. vs. Patch vs. Patch vs. vs. Primary Outcome: Abstinence at 26 Weeks a 63 (26.1%) 108 (25.5%) 124 (29.5%) -0.6 (-6.3 to 7.6) P=.8494-3.3 (-10.4 to 3.7) P=.3623-4.0 (-10.0 to 2.0) P=.1947 (0.7 to 1.4) (0.8 to 1.7) (0.6 to ) Abstinence at 4 Weeks a 86 (35.7%) 159 (37.5%) 166 (39.4%) -1.8 (-9.4 to 5.8) P=.6409-3.8 (-11.4 to 3.9) P=.3396-1.9 (-8.5 to 4.6) P<.5642 1.1 (0.8 to 1.5) 1.1 ( to 1.6) (0.7 to ) Abstinence at 12 Weeks a 68 (28.2%) 146 (34.4%) 139 (33.0%) -6.2 (-13.5 to ) P=.0990-4.8 (-12.0 to 2.4) P=.1998 1.4 (-5.0 to 7.8) P=.6630 ( to 1.9) ( to 1.8) ( to 1.6) Abstinence at 52 Weeks a 52 (21.6%) 85 (20.1%) 87 (20.7%) 1.5 (-4.9 to 8.0) P=.6392 (-5.6 to 7.4) P=.7819-0.6 (-6.1 to 4.8) P=.8235 (0.6 to ) (0.6 to 1.4) (0.7 to 1.4) a Abstinence self-report was biochemically confirmed via exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) testing with abstinence confirmed with a CO value of 9 parts per million (ppm). b C-NRT = Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy ( and Nicotine Lozenge). c Pairwise comparisons of Abstinence s were tested via Proc Freq (SAS Institute) by specifying the RISKDIFF option which provides standard Wald asymptotic confidence limits for the risks. d Unadjusted odds ratios based on logistic regression analysis.

etable 4. Cox Regression Survival Analysis of Latency to Relapse in the First Six Months Postquit Latency to Relapse a Treatment Group Hazard Ratio p-value (Reference Category) - - + Nicotine Lozenge 43 (0.78 to 1.14) 15 (0.76 to 1.11).5543.3613 a Latency to relapse=relapse within the first six months postquit; relapse defined as 7 consecutive days of smoking.

etable 5. A Priori Covariates and Week 26 Biochemically-Confirmed Point Abstinence (CO Cutoff=5 ppm) by Treatment Group Variable Week 26 CO-Confirmed Point Abstinence Variable Coding No. Abstinent/Total (%) C-NRT e Vs. Vs. C-NRT e Cohort Cohort 1 (N=169) 11/32 (34.4%) 13/65 (20.0%) 25/72 (34.7%) 14.4 (-4.7 to 33.5) -0.3 (-20.1 to 19.5) Cohort 2 (N=917) 44/209 (21.1%) 87/359 (24.2%) 88/349 (25.2%) -3.2 (-10.3 to 3.9) -4.2 (-1 to 3.0) Site Madison (N=368) 17/79 (21.5%) 40/146 (27.4%) 43/143 (30.1%) -5.9 (117.5 to 5.7) -8.6 (-20.3 to 3.2) Milwaukee (N=718) 38/162 (23.5%) 60/278 (21.6%) 70/278 (25.2%) 1.9 (-6.3 to 10.0) -1.7 (-10.0 to 6.6) Gender Female (N=566) 28/125 (22.4%) 49/222 (22.1%) 61/219 (27.9%) 0.3 (-8.8 to 9.5) -5.5 (-14.9 to 4.0) Male (N=520) 27/116 (23.3%) 51/202 (25.3%) 52/202 (25.7%) -2.0 (-11.7 to 7.8) -2.5 (-12.2 to 7.3) Race Non-White (N=358) 11/83 (13.3%) 25/141 (17.7%) 24/134 (17.9%) -4.5 (-14.1 to 5.2) -4.7 (-14.4 to 5.1) White (N=728) 44/158 (27.9%) 75/283 (26.5%) 89/287 (3%) 1.4 (-7.3 to 10.0) -3.2 (-12.0 to 5.6) Income <$20,0000 (N=345) 17/80 (2%) 20/131 (15.3%) 29/134 (21.6%) 6.0 (-4.9 to 16.9) -0.3 (-11.8 to 1) $20,000 (N=688) 35/148 (23.7%) 77/275 (28.0%) 79/265 (29.8%) -4.4 (-13.0 to 4.3) -6.2 (-15.0 to 2.6) Total N=1033

Variable Week 26 CO-Confirmed Point Abstinence Variable Coding No. Abstinent/Total (%) C-NRT e Vs. Vs. C-NRT e FTND a Total Score 0-4 (N=463) 24/94 (25.5%) 58/182 (31.9%) 48/187 (25.7%) -6.3 (-17.5 to 4.8) -0.2 (-1 to 10.7) 5-10 (N=618) 31/147 (21.1%) 41/239 (17.2%) 63/232 (27.2%) 3.9 (-4.2 to 12.1) -6.1 (-14.8 to 2.7) Total N=1081 Likelihood of Quitting b 1-5 (N=425) 18/88 (20.5%) 30/170 (17.7%) 36/167 (21.6%) 2.8 (-7.4 to 13.0) -1.1 (-11.6 to 9.4) 6-7 (N=645) 35/149 (23.5%) 68/245 (27.8%) 76/251 (30.3%) -4.3 (-13.1 to 4.6) -6.8 (-15.7 to 2.1) Total N=1070 Age (years) 18-49 (N=521) 26/109 (23.9%) 43/222 (19.4%) 48/190 (25.3%) 4.5 (-5.1 to 14.0) -1.4 (-11.5 to 8.7) 50+ (N=565) 29/132 (22.0%) 57/202 (28.2%) 65/231 (28.1%) -6.3 (-15.7 to 3.2) -6.2 (-15.3 to 3.0) Carbon Monoxide (ppm) 5-14 (N = 616) 36/139 (25.9%) 59/236 (25.0%) 69/241 (28.6%) (-8.2 to 10.0) -2.7 (-12.0 to 6.5) 15+ (N=470) 19/102 (18.6%) 41/188 (21.8%) 44/180 (24.4%) -3.2 (-1.8 to 6.4) -5.8 (-15.6 to 4.0) Home Smoking c No (N=641) 38/143 (26.6%) 67/256 (26.2%) 68/242 (28.1%) 0.4 (-8.6 to 9.4) -1.5 (-10.7 to 7.7) Yes (N=439) 17/98 (17.4%) 32/165 (19.4%) 44/176 (25.0%) -2.1 (-11.7 to 7.6) -7.7 (-17.5 to 2.2) Total N=1080

Variable Week 26 CO-Confirmed Point Abstinence Variable Coding No. Abstinent/Total (%) C-NRT e Vs. Vs. C-NRT e Prior Use of Cessation of Medications d No (N=319) 19/78 (24.4%) 21/119 (17.7%) 29/122 (23.8%) 6.7 (-5.0 to 18.4) 0.5 (-11.6 to 12.8) Yes (N=767) 36/163 (22.1%) 79/305 (25.9%) 84/299 (28.1%) -3.8 (-11.9 to 4.2) -6.0 (-14.2 to 2.2) Menthol Smoking No (N=534) 34/125 (27.2%) 55/197 (27.9%) 72/212 (34.0%) -0.7 (-10.7 to 9.3) -6.8 (-16.8 to 3.30 Yes (N=547) 21/115 (18.3%) 44/224 (19.6%) 40/208 (19.2%) -1.4 (-10.2 to 7.4) - (-9.8 to 7.9) Total N=1081 FTND a Item 1 Smoke > 30 Min (N=246) 19/53 (35.9%) 31/99 (3%) 29/94 (3%) 4.5 (-1 to 20.4) 5.0 (-1 to 2) Smoke Within 30 Min of Waking (N=836) 36/188 (19.2%) 69/324 (2%) 82/324 (25.3%) -2.2 (-9.3 to 5.0) -6.2 (-13.5 to ) Total N=1082 a FTND=Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence. 19 b Likelihood of Quitting Success item was rated on 1 to 7 scale (1=not at all; 7=extremely). c Home Smoking=presence (No/Yes) of any smokers living in the home of the participant. d Prior Cessation Medication Use=prior use of varenicline or nicotine patch, gum, or lozenge. e C-NRT = Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy ( and Nicotine Lozenge).

etable 6. Medication Adherence in Past Week at Study Visits No. (%) Post-Quit Week Only (N=241) (N=424) + Nicotine Lozenge (N=421) Patch Adherence Pill Adherence Patch Adherence Lozenge Adherence 1 181 (75.1%) 331 (78.1%) 320 (76.0%) 299 (7%) 4 142 (58.9%) 283 (66.7%) 260 (61.8%) 258 (6%) 8 109 (45.2%) 209 (49.3%) 209 (49.6%) 181 (43.0%) Past week adherence for the patch was defined as using one patch per day for 6 or 7 days; adherent use of varenicline was defined as taking 1 or 2 pills per day for 6 or 7 days; and adherent use of the lozenge was defined as using at least 2 lozenges per day for 6 or 7 days.