PSY 5201: Social Cognition and Interpersonal Processes

College of Arts & Sciences Department of Psychology Oakland University PSY 5201: Social Cognition and Interpersonal Processes Instructor: Dr. Virgil Zeigler-Hill Course Section #: 14199-001 Class Time: Tu/Th 3:00pm-4:47pm Office Hours: Th 1:00pm-3:00pm Office: 212A Pryale Hall E-mail: zeiglerh@oakland.edu Website: www.zeigler-hill.com Classroom: 130 Pryale Hall Course Description Outcomes & Objectives The goal of this course is to cover current perspectives in social psychology that provide an overview of current research and thinking in the field. I have selected the topics for this course in an effort to give you a broad sampling of current issues in social cognition and interpersonal processes. Course Procedures: Informal lectures and discussion Course Objectives: 1. Learn basic concepts in social psychology. 2. Demonstrate an understanding of research in social psychology. Student Conduct: Students are expected to adhere to the guidelines for student conduct outlined in the Graduate Student Handbook. Student Conduct Policy on Academic Misconduct: The University s regulations that relate to academic misconduct will be fully enforced. Any student suspected of cheating and/or plagiarism will be reported to the Dean of Students and, thereafter, to the Academic Conduct Committee for adjudication. Anyone found guilty of academic misconduct in this course may receive a course grade of 0.0, in addition to any penalty assigned by the Academic Conduct Committee. Students found guilty of academic misconduct by the Academic Conduct Committee may face suspension or permanent dismissal. The full policy on academic misconduct can be found in the General Information section of the Graduate Catalog. 1

Attendance: It is expected that you will attend class regularly. However, if you need to miss class because of an emergency (e.g., severe illness, death of a close relative), then let me know as soon as possible. Excused Absence Policy: University excused absences apply to participation as an athlete, manager, or student trainer in NCAA intercollegiate competitions, or participation as a representative of Oakland University at academic events and artistic performances approved by the Provost or designee. For the OU excused absence policy, see http://wwwp.oakland.edu/provost/policies-and-procedures/ Faculty Feedback: As a student in this class, you may receive Faculty Feedback in your OU e- mail if your professor identifies areas of concern that may impede your success in the class. Faculty Feedback typically occurs during weeks 2-5 of the Fall and Winter terms, but may also be given later in the semester and more than once a semester. A Faculty Feedback e-mail will specify the area(s) of concern and recommend action(s) you should take. Please remember to check your OU email account regularly as that is where it will appear. Basic Information and Expectations Audio Recording Policy: Students who wish to audio-record lectures may request permission to do so. These recordings may only be used for the purpose of personal study. Students may not share these recordings with other individuals without the consent of the professor. At the conclusion of the semester, students may request permission to keep these recordings if needed, otherwise it is expected that all audio-recordings will be deleted from all electronic recording and storage devices. Veteran Support Services: The office of Veteran Support Services (VSS) is responsible for giving support services to more than 300 veterans, service members, and dependents of veterans. VSS is staffed with personnel who are veterans and current or former students. Any student veteran or dependent of a veteran requiring assistance with navigating the Veterans Administration, understanding service-related benefits, or requires referrals to campus and community resources should contact one of the Veterans Liaisons by visiting 116 North Foundation Hall, or phoning 248-370-2010. http://wwwp.oakland.edu/veterans/ Do Not Fall Behind: It is critical that you keep up with the material in this class. We will cover a great deal of material this semester so you will have considerable trouble if you fall behind. Readings: Reading assignments will be given in class. I expect you to carefully read each of the articles/chapters for each class. Reading the assigned material is mandatory for this course. Class Participation: You are expected to be an active participant in this class. You will learn more effectively if you take part in class by asking questions, answering questions, and engaging in discussions. Add/Drops & Incompletes: The University add/drop and incomplete grade policies will be explicitly followed. It is your responsibility to be aware of the University deadline dates for adding or dropping the course. Special Considerations: A student with a documented learning or physical disability must contact the Office of Disability Support Services, 103A North Foundation Hall, (248) 370-3266, and inform the professor of special needs during first week of classes. For more information, visit http://www.oakland.edu/dss 2

Grades in this course will be based on evaluations of the following materials: Participation in discussion, reaction papers, leading discussions, a research proposal, and a presentation concerning the research proposal. Participation in Discussion: The format of this course is a graduate-level seminar. That is, it will consist primarily of informal lecture and discussion. It is essential that everyone comes to each class prepared to discuss the assigned readings. If you miss class, then you obviously will be unable to participate in the class discussion. Excessive absences and/or failure to participate in discussion will have a negative impact on your grade. Do not confuse participation with talking a lot. Making one meaningful comment will be given more weight than 10 trivial ones. It is also possible that I will give reading quizzes on some days to make sure that students have completed the assigned readings. Reaction Papers: You will write a one-page (typed and double-spaced) reaction paper each week. These reaction papers should reflect your thoughts about that particular topic (e.g., comments about the readings, ideas for future research). These reaction papers must include at least two discussion questions to help stimulate discussion during class. These reaction papers should be e- mailed to me by 11:59pm the night before class. Students with last names that begin with A-H will write reaction papers for Tuesday classes and those with last names that begin with I-Z will write reaction papers for Thursday classes. Grade Determination Leading Discussion: Each student will lead/co-lead two class sessions this semester (i.e., one will be done alone and one will be done as part of a group). This activity will consist of two parts: (1) giving a 30-minute PowerPoint presentation about the topic being covered that day and (2) leading discussion about the required readings. During the PowerPoint presentation, you should provide an overview of the topic and integrate at least 3 empirical articles that are not required reading for the course. These presentations should be well-prepared and rehearsed. Research Proposal: You will propose an empirical investigation of a topic relevant to the study of the social cognition. This research proposal should not simply be a slight modification of another project or a research proposal for another course. Rather, this should be a completely original research proposal that concerns a topic that clearly falls within the scope of this course. The Introduction and Method section for the proposal should be approximately 10-15 pages in length (but it may be longer, if necessary). It should be written in APA-style. The proposal should cite at least 15 sources that are not required readings for this course. The body of the paper should consist of the Introduction and the Method sections. You will turn in a 1-page prospectus to me on February 15th, 2018. Your final research proposal is due on April 19th, 2018. Presentation Concerning Research Proposal: Students will be responsible for giving a 15- minute PowerPoint presentation concerning their research proposal. This presentation will be followed by a 5 minute question-and-answer session. Point Distribution for the Course Participation in Discussion 20 points Reaction Papers 20 points Leading Discussion 30 points Research Proposal 20 points Presentation Concerning Research 10 points Proposal TOTAL 100 points 3

Tentative Schedule This is an estimate of the topics we will be covering on certain days. Date Topic 1-4 INTRODUCTION Fiske, S. T. (2010). Social cognition: Making sense of others. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Social beings: Core social motives in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 127-175). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Reis, H. T. (2010). How we got here from there: A brief history of social psychology. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 25-60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Reis, H. T., & Holmes, J. G. (2012). Perspectives on the situation. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 64-92). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). History of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and contributions to theory and application. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3-50). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 1-9 SEXUAL DESIRE Lemay, E. P., & Wolf, N. R. (2016). Projection of romantic and sexual desire in opposite-sex friendships: How wishful thinking creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 864-878. Muise, A., Stanton, S. C. E., Kim, J. J., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Not in the mood? Men under- (not over-) perceive their partner s sexual desire in established intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 725-742. Day, L. C., Muise, A., Joel, S., & Impett, E. A. (2015). To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 791-804. Kohl, C., & Robertson, J. (2014). The sexual overperception bias: An exploration of the relationship between mate value and perception of sexual interest. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8, 31-43. Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Desmarais, S. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320-1332. 4

1-11 ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE CHANGE Akhtar, O., & Wheeler, S. C. (2016). Belief in the immutability of attitudes both increases and decreases advocacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 475-492. Snyder, A. I., & Tormala, Z. L. (2017). Valence asymmetries in attitude ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 555-576. Blankenship, K. L., Wegener, D. T., & Murray, R. A. (2012). Circumventing resistance: Using values to indirectly change attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 606-621. Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391-417. Brinol, P., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2015). Naïve theories about persuasion: Implications for information processing and consumer attitude change. International Journal of Advertising, 34, 85-106. Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731. Han, H. A., Czellar, S., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2010). Malleability of attitudes or malleability of IAT? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 286-298. 1-16 EMOTION Halevy, N. (2017). Preemptive strikes: Fear, hope, and defensive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 224-237. Netzer, L., Igra, L., Anan, Y. B., & Tamir, M. (2015). When bad emotions seem better: Experience changes the automatic evaluation of anger. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 797-804. Grossmann, I., Huynh, A. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2016). Emotional complexity: Clarifying definitions and cultural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 895-916. Mumenthaler, C., & Sander, D. (2012). Social appraisal influences recognition of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 118-135. Niedenthal, P. M., & Brauer, M. (2012). Social functionality of human emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 259-285. Schneider, K. G., Hempel, R. J., & Lynch, T. R. (2013). That poker face just might lose you the game! The impact of expressive suppression and mimicry on sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion. Emotion, 13, 852-866. 5

1-18 MOTIVATION Beall, A. T., & Tracy, J. L. (in press). Emotivational psychology: How distinct emotions facilitate fundamental motives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Griskevicius, V., Becker, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2010). Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: The fundamental-motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 63-67. Higgins, E. T., & Pittman, T. S. (2008). Motives of the human animal: Comprehending, managing, and sharing inner states. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 361-385. Kuntsman, J. W., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 282-294. Neel, R., Kenrick, D. T., White, A. E., & Neuberg, S. L. (2016). Individual differences in fundamental social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 887-907. Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). When motivation backfires: Optimal levels of motivation as a function of cognitive capacity in information relevance perception and social judgment. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 261-273. 1-23 PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25, 656-664. Habashi, M. M., Graziano, W. G., & Hoover, A. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A Big Five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1177-1192. Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Ferris, L. J. (2014). Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psychological Science, 25, 2079-2085. Marlowe, F. W., Berbesque, J. C., Barrett, C., Boylanatz, A., Gurven, M., & Tracer, D. (2011). The spiteful origins of human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 2159-2164. Parks, C. D., Joireman, J., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: How public goods are promoted. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 119-165. Prentice, M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2015). Evolutionary and social psychological perspectives on human cooperation. In V. Zeigler-Hill, L. L. M. Welling, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 267-277). New York, NY: Springer. 6

1-25 FORMADIBILITY Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 385-406. Wilson, J. P., Hugenberg, K., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 59-80. Fessler, D. M., & Holbrook, C. (2013). Friends shrink foes: The presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent. Psychological Science, 24, 797-802. Fessler, D. M., Holbrook, C., & Snyder, J. K. (2012). Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PloS one, 7, e32751. Fessler, D. M., Tiokhin, L. B., Holbrook, C., Gervais, M. M., & Snyder, J. K. (2014). Foundations of the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 26-33. Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073-15078. 1-30 AGGRESSION Anderson, C. A., & Anderson, K. B. (2008). Men who target women: Specificity of target, generality of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 605-622. Arriaga, X. B., Capezza, N. M., & Daly, C. A. (2016). Personal standards for judging aggression by a relationship partner: How much aggression is too much? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 36-54. Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2010). Aggression. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 833-863). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2008). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 980-994. Trebicky, V., Havlicek, J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., & Kleisner, K. (2013). Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. Psychological Science, 24, 1664-1672. 7

2-1 AFFILIATION Fetterman, A. K., Boyd, R. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2015). Power versus affiliation in political ideology: Robust linguistic evidence for distinct motivation-related signatures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1195-1206. Lambert, N. M., Stillman, T. F., Hicks, J. A., Kamble, S., Baumeister, R. F., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1418-1427. Dufner, M., Arslan, R. C., Hagemeyer, B., Schonbrodt, F. D., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2015). Affective contingencies in the affiliative domain: Physiological assessment, associations with the affiliation motive, and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 662-676. Leary, M. R. (2010). Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging: The pursuit of interpersonal connection. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 864-897). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2-6 SOCIAL REJECTION Chester, D. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2017). Combating the sting of rejection with the pleasure of revenge: A new look at how emotion shapes aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 413-430. Critcher, C. R., & Zayas, V. (2014). The involuntary excluder effect: Those included by an excluder are seen as exclusive themselves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 454-474. Breines, J. G., & Ayduk, O. (2015). Rejection sensitivity and vulnerability to self-directed hostile cognitions following rejection. Journal of Personality, 83, 1-13. Garris, C. P., Ohbuchi, K., Oikawa, H., & Harris, M. J. (2011). Consequences of interpersonal rejection: A cross-cultural experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1066-1083. Gilbert, L. R., Pond, R. S., Haak, E. A., DeWall, C. N., & Keller, P. S. (2015). Sleep problems exacerbate the emotional consequences of interpersonal rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 50-63. Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 71-75. Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 867-884. 8

2-8 DECEPTION AND SELFISHNESS Frimer, J. A., Schaefer, N. K., & Oakes, H. (2014). Moral actor, selfish agent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 790-802. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 329-342. Darke, P. R., & Chaiken, S. (2005). The pursuit of self-interest: Self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 864-883. Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 436-449. Repke, M. A., Conway, L. G., & Houck, S. C. (2018). The strategic manipulation of linguistic complexity: A test of two models of lying. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37, 74-92. 2-13 PERSON PERCEPTION Hehman, E., Sutherland, C. A. M., Flake, J. K., & Slepian, M. L. (2017). The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 513-529. Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21, 1777-1782. Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 428-463). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Stillman, T. F., & Maner, J. K. (2009). A sharp eye for her SOI: Perception and misperception of female sociosexuality at zero acquaintance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 124-130. 9

2-15 NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR [1-PAGE PROSPECTUS FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL IS DUE] Kawakami, K., Williams, A., Sidhu, D., Choma, B. L., Rodriguez-Bailón, R., Cañadas, E.,... Hugenberg, K. (2014). An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1-20. Schroeder, J., Fishbach, A., Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2017). Functional intimacy: Needing but not wanting the touch of a stranger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 910-924. Ambady, N., & Weisbuch, M. (2010). Nonverbal behavior. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 464-497). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Fairbairn, C. E., Sayette, M. A., Aalen, O. O., & Frigessi, A. (2015). Alcohol and emotional contagion: An examination of the spreading of smiles in male and female drinking groups. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 686-701. Gunns, R. E., Johnston, L., & Hudson, S. M. (2002). Victim selection and kinematics: A point-light investigation of vulnerability to attack. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 129-158. Little, A. C., Connely, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2011). Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 862-868. 2-20 NO CLASS: WINTER RECESS 2-22 NO CLASS: WINTER RECESS 2-27 MIND PERCEPTION de Melo, C. M., Carnevale, P. J., Read, S. J., & Gratch, J. (2014). Reading people s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 73-88. Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Zhuang, J., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2012). Judging romantic interest of others from thin slices is a cross-cultural ability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 547-550. Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 498-541). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Kalbe, E., Schlegel, M., Sack, A. T., Nowak, D. A., Dafotakis, M., Bangard, C., & Kessler, J. (2010). Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: A TMS study. Cortex, 46, 769-780. 10

3-1 OBEDIENCE & CONFORMITY [ONLINE CLASS] Watch Milgram video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcvli-_4gzq Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1-11. Nook, E. C., Ong, D. C., Morelli, S. A., Mitchell, J. P., & Zaki, J. (2016). Prosocial conformity: Prosocial norms generalize across behavior and empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1045-1062. Burger, J. M., Girgis, Z. M., & Manning, C. C. (2011). In their own words: Explaining obedience to authority through an examination of participants comments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 460-466. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Coultas, J. C., & van Leeuwen, E. J. C. (2015). Conformity: Definitions, types, and evolutionary grounding. In V. Zeigler-Hill, L. L. M. Welling, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 189-202). New York, NY: Springer. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281-294. 3-6 MORAL REASONING Crimston, D., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 636-653. Kreps, T. A., Laurin, K., & Merritt, A. C. (2017). Hypocritical flip-flop, or courageous evolution? When leaders change their moral minds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 730-752. Giammarco, E. A. (2016). The measurement of individual differences in morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 26-34. Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M., & Colucci, F. P. (2015). To feel or not to feel when my group harms others? The regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1223-1235. Smith, I. H., Aquino, K., Koleva, S., & Graham, J. (2014). The moral ties that bind even to outgroups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25, 1554-1562. 11

3-8 FAILURE Belanger, J. J., Lafreniere, M., Vallerand, R. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). Driven by fear: The effect of success and failure information on passionate individuals performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 180-195. Hayes, J., Ward, C. L. P., & McGregor, I. (2016). Why bother? Death, failure, and fatalistic withdrawal from life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 96-115. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 957-971. McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2005). The shame of failure: Examining the link between fear of failure and shame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 218-231. Niya, Y., Crocker, J., & Bartness, E. N. (2004). From vulnerability to resilience: Learning orientations buffer contingent self-esteem from failure. Psychological Science, 15, 801-805. 3-13 SOCIAL COMPARISONS Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2016). Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 178-194. Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015). The tango of two deadly sins: The social-functional relation of envy and pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 453-472. Moscatelli, S., Albarello, F., Prati, F., & Rubini, M. (2014). Badly off or better off than them? The impact of relative deprivation and relative gratification on intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 248-264. Van Yperen, N. W., & Leander, N. P. (2014). The overpowering effect of social comparison information: On the misalignment between mastery-based goals and self-evaluation criteria. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 676-688. 12

3-15 PREJUDICE, STEREOTYPING, AND DISCRIMINATION Cortland, C. I., Craig, M. A., Shapiro, J. R., Richeson, J. A., Neel, R., & Goldstein, N. J. (2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 547-567. Zou, L. X., & Cheryan, S. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 696-717. Apfelbaum, E. P., Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 918-932. Ashton-James, C. E., & Tracy, J. L. (2012). Pride and prejudice: How feelings about the self influence judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 466-476. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1084-1121). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Forscher, P. S., Cox, W. T. L., Graetz, N., & Devine, P. G. (2015). The motivation to express prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 791-812. Newheiser, A. K., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Entitativity and prejudice: Examining their relationship and the moderating effect of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 920-926. 3-20 INTERGROUP RELATIONS Rovenpor, D. R., O Brien, T. C., Roblain, A., De Guissmé, L., Chekroun, P., & Leidner, B. (in press). Intergroup conflict self-perpetuates via meaning: Exposure to intergroup conflict increases meaning and fuels a desire for further conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Wolf, L. J., von Hecker, U., & Maio, G. R. (2017). Affective and cognitive orientations in intergroup perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 828-844. Brewer, M. B. (2010). Intergroup relations. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 535-571). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Cikara, M., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 245-274. Passini, S. (2017). From the banality of evil to the complicity of indifference: The effects on intergroup relationships. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 33-40. Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010). Intergroup relations. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1024-1083). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 13

3-22 CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES Miller, J. D., Maples, J. L., Buffardi, L., Cai, H., Gentile, B., Kisbu-Sakarya, Y., & Campbell, W. K. (2015). Narcissism and United States culture: The view from home and around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1068-1089. Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2017). The crowded life is a slow life: Population density and life history strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 736-754. Heine, S. J. (2010). Cultural psychology. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 655-696). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Morgan, T. J. H., Cross, C. P., & Rendell, L. E. (2015). Nothing in human behavior makes sense except in light of culture: Shared interests of social psychology and cultural evolution. In V. Zeigler- Hill, L. L. M. Welling, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 215-228). New York, NY: Springer. White, A. E., Kenrick, D. T., Neel, R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2013). From the bedroom to the budget deficit: Mate competition changes men s attitudes toward economic redistribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 924-940. 3-27 COMPETITION Huang, S., Etkin, J., & Jin, L. (2017). How winning changes motivation in multiphase competitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 813-837. Pierce, J. R., Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Sivanathan, N. (2013). From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science, 24, 1986-1994. Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634-650. Slatcher, R. B., Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2011). Testosterone and self-reported dominance interact to influence human mating behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 531-539. 14

3-29 POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR 4-3 POWER Crawford, J. T., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2017). Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 383-412. Osborne, D., Milojev, P., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Authoritarianism and national identity: Examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1086-1099. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136. Kteily, N. S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., & Ho, A. K. (2017). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-)egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 136-159. Thornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., & Aran, D. (2009). Parasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries. Biological Reviews, 84, 113-131. Belmi, P., & Laurin, K. (2016). Who wants to get to the top? Class and lay theories about power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 505-529. Williams, M. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2017). Sexual aggression when power is new: Effects of acute high power on chronically low-power individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 201-223. Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195-217. Sherman, G. D., Lerner, J. S., Josephs, R. A., Renshon, J., & Gross, J. J. (2016). The interaction of testosterone and cortisol is associated with attained status in male executives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 921-929. 15

4-5 JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451-462. Perfecto, H., Galak, J., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2017). Rejecting a bad option feels like choosing a good one. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 659-670. Ebert, J. E. J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Forecasting and backcasting: Predicting the impact of events on the future. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 353-366. Shanks, D. R., Vadillo, M. A., Riedel, B., Clymo, A., Govind, S., Hickin, N., Tamman, A. J. F., & Puhlmann, L. M. C. (2015). Romance, risk, and replication: Can consumer choices and risk-taking be primed by mating motives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 142-158. 4-10 RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATIONS: DAY 1 4-12 RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATIONS: DAY 2 4-17 RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATIONS: DAY 3 4-19 RESEARCH PROPOSAL IS DUE BY 12:00PM 16