Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Similar documents
Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Nonextraction Management of Class II Malocclusion Using Powerscope: A Case Report

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

The Tip-Edge appliance and

6. Timing for orthodontic force

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

THE JASPER JUMPER APPLIANCE; USAGE, EFFECTS AND RECENT MODIFICATIONS

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Different Non Surgical Treatment Modalities for Class III Malocclusion

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF BUCCAL CROSSBITE OF MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

Removable appliances

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Applicability of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device as a Class II Corrector in Young Adults

Skeletal Anchorage for Orthodontic Correction of Severe Maxillary Protrusion after Previous Orthodontic Treatment

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Non extraction treatment of growing skeletal class II malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Appliance- A Case Report

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module

clinical orthodontics article

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

Extractions of first permanent molars in orthodontics: Treatment planning, technical considerations and two clinical case reports

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

ORTHODONTIC CORRECTION Of OCCLUSAL CANT USING MINI IMPLANTS:A CASE REPORT. Gupta J*, Makhija P.G.**, Jain V***

Treatment of a Class II Division 2 Patient with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy by Using a Custom Made TPA Proclination Spring

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Checklist with summary points

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Ortho-surgical Management of Severe Vertical Dysplasia: A Case Report

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

Interdisciplinary management of Impacted teeth in an adult with Orthodontics & Free Gingival graft : A Case Report

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

New Class of Appliance

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

FIXED FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE: POWERSCOPE -A CASE SERIES

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

The management of impacted

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

The 20/20 Molar Tube. Ronald M. Roncone, D.D.S., M.S.

Compromised nonsurgical treatment of a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

mandibular deficiency and maxillary and mandibular crowding: follow-up evaluation

Correction of a maxillary canine-first premolar transposition using mini-implant anchorage

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

Transcription:

15 CASE REPORT Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector Amit Prakash 1,O.P.Mehta 2, Kshitij Gupta 3 Swapnil Pandey 4 Deep Kumar Suryawanshi 4 1 Senior lecturer Bhopal - INDIA 2 Professor Bhopal INDIA 3 Reader Bhopal INDIA 4 PG Student 1 st Year Bhopal - INDIA Corresponding Author Dr. Amit Prakash Email: drprakash24@yahoo.co.in amitprakash30@gmail.com Mobile number - +91-8602216248 Access this Article Online www.idjsr.com Use the QR Code scanner to access this article online in our database Article Code: IDJSR 0067 Quick Response Code Abstract The present protocol for the correction of Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrognathism is by using the fixed functional appliances. This article includes a case treated with Gentle Jumper a flexible fixed functional appliance. A pre-pubertal patient with class II malocclusion with 70% deep bite was treated with Gentle Jumper along with fixed appliance (MBT - 0.022 slot). Deep bite has been treated with extrusion of posteriors and proclination of anteriors. It resulted in the favorable skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in the mandible. There was slight proclination of lower incisors. Good soft tissue changes were noted. Gentle Jumper is an efficient class II corrector in pre-pubertal period. It promotes patient compliance with very minimal breakages. Key words: Gentle Jumper Deep bite, Class II malocclusion Introduction Fixed functional appliances are non- As an adjunct compliance Class II corrector. to fixed appliance therapy, the Gentle Jumper 1 provides an opportunity to minimize extractions and to reduce or eliminate headgear. When activated by 4 mm, the Jasper Jumper will exert 360 grams of force. By comparison, at the same amount of deflection, the Gentle Jumper exerts just 75 grams of force, which is better suited to mixed dentitionn cases. The Gentle Jumper provides the following advantages: 1. They are fixed so patient cooperation is assured. 2. They work along the growth or Y axis, thus they properly advance the mandible rather than retracting the maxilla. 3. Because of the ball joint, the Jumpers swivel allowing normal functions such as eating and tooth brushing. 4. They are safe. No extra-oral traction is involved. 5. They are cosmetic. INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL OF STUDENT S RESEARCH June 2013-Nov 2013 Volume 2 Issue 1

16 6. They can be used for Class II or Class III corrections and can apply different forces on each side of the jaw for cross bites. 7. Forces are adjustable and measurable. Measuring for correct size: To get the right length, have patients bite in their retruded or centric bite and measure from the mesial of the headgear tube to the distal of the lower ball stop, then add 12 mm (4 mm for the tube, 4 mm of free play, and 4 mm of built-in activation). Some patients may require different length Jumpers on the left or right side. Sectional Wire for main arch wire attachment A sectional wire has been specially designed for Gentle Jumper use. The uniqueness of this wire lies in the anterior loop design and its attachment to the main arch wire. This loop design allows for attachment to the main arch from lingual to buccal as opposed to the conventional wrap around from buccal to lingual. The advantages are lower profile and minimal patient irritation in addition to trouble free action and the virtual impossibility of displacement from the main arch. The hypothesized mechanism of Class II correction with Gentle jumper include- Basal restraint of the maxilla. Dento alveolar retraction of the maxillary dentition. Dento alveolar protraction of the mandibular dentition. Increased growth at the mandibular condyle. Downward/forward glenoid fossa remodeling Lateral expansion of the maxillary molars. Case Report Diagnosis A 14 year old female reported with the chief complaint of irregularly placed upper and lower front teeth. She had skeletal and dental class II malocclusion with upper and lower anterior crowding. She had a convex profile, decreased lower facial height, deep mentolabial sulcus. (Fig: 1) Model analysis revealed crowding of 2mm in the upper arch and 4mm in the lower arch, an overjet of 6 mm and overbite of 5 mm (70%).lower midline is deviated towards right side by 1mm. 4mm of curve of spee present in the lower arch. (Fig: 2) Treatment Objectives Correction of skeletal class II Correction of class II canine bilaterally and class II molar relation on right side Relieving of upper and lower anterior crowding To correct the midline discrepancy To correct the deep curve of spee To achieve ideal overjet /overbite Correction of convex profile Treatment plan Non-extraction was planned because space requirement was minimal. Fixed functional (Gentle jumper) was planned to correct skeletal and dental class II malocclusion. As the objective was to correct both skeletal and dental relation flexible appliance with light force was selected. Placement of fixed functional bilaterally was planned so that we can achieve Class I canine relation and midline match. Treatment Progress Initial alignment and leveling was done with 0.016 NiTi followed by0.019 0.025 NiTi. After initial alignment & leveling, 0.019 0.025 stainless steel was placed in both the arch. Additional 10º labial root torque was added in the anterior segment of the lower archwire to counteract the lower incisor proclination. Upper and lower arch consolidation was done. Sectional 0.017 0.025 stainless steel wire was placed in auxiliary lower tube. Gentle jumper was placed and continued for 6 months. (Fig: 4, 5) After removal of fixed functional appliance Class II elastics were continued for 2 month for retention of all the correction. (Fig: 6) Discussion The Gentle jumper is flexible fixed functional appliance, attached to maxillary and mandibular arch to produce rapid inter arch changes either through head-gear like or activator like forces or a combination of both. This appliances use pushing mechanics with intrusive force vectors as side effects, which are beneficial since intrusion of lower incisors is usually necessary during the correction of Class II malocclusions. The force modules are available in seven lengths ranging from 26

17 to 38 mm in 2 mm increment. They are designed to use on either side of dental arch. When the force module is straight, it remains passive. As the teeth come into occlusion, the force module is curved axially, and produces light force. This kinetic energy developed is converted to potential energy to be used for the various clinical effects. 2 To enhance the anchorage, transpalatal arch is used in maxillary dentition and lingual arch in mandibular dentition if needed. The spring mechanism is a modification of the original bite jumping mechanism of appliance. The flexible spring module provides greater freedom of mandibular movement. It works best with MBT 0.022 slot prescription because this bracket system have -6º torque in the lower anterior region and additional -10º labial root torque given in lower archwire helps to counteract the proclining effect on the lower anterior teeth. Conclusion Treatment of Class II malocclusion in is always challenging. Applying sound biomechanical principles to execute the mechanics plan is the surest way to achieve predictable results with minimal side effects. Gentle jumper is an efficient class II corrector in patients with retruded mandible producing favorable skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissues changes. It is a compliance free appliance providing 24 7 stimulus. It provides an alternative to other fixed functional class II appliance systems. Together with dental effects, the mandibular displacement achieved leads to an improvement in sagittal discrepancy. References 1. M. Papadopoulos. Orthodontic treatment of the Class II noncompliant patient. Mosby; 2006: p 21-203. 2. Jasper, J.J. and McNamara, J.A. Jr.: The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module, Am. J. Orthod. 108:641-650, 1995.

18 Figure 1 Pre treatment extraoral photographs Figure 2: Pre-treatment extraoral photographs Fig 3-With fixed functional appliance (Gentle-Jumper) - 0.019x0.025 SS arch wire

19 Figure 4: Post-functional extraoral photographs Figure 5: Post-functional intraoral photographs Figure 6: Post-functional photographs with Class II elastics for retention