FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ALLYLESTRENOL IMMEDIATE RELEASE TABLETS

Similar documents
Aparajita Malakar et al / Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Vol. 4 (2), 2012,

Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., 2014; 4(1):47-51 ISSN:

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF PIROXICAM AND CELECOXIB TABLETS EMPLOYING PROSOLVE BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD

Formulation and evaluation of immediate release salbutamol sulphate

STABILITY STUDIES OF FORMULATED CONTROLLED RELEASE ACECLOFENAC TABLETS

Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Chewable Tablets of Montelukast Sodium

STUDIES ON EFFECT OF BINDERS ON ETORICOXIB TABLET FORMULATIONS

Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science ISSN Vol. 2 (2), July-Sept,2012

Formulation and evaluation of oro-dispersible tablets of lafutidine

Global College of Pharmacy, Kahnpur Khui, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, Distt.- Ropar, Punjab, India

FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ER METOPROLAOL SUCCINATE TABLETS

7. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

FABRICATION AND EVALUATION OF GLIMEPIRIDE CORDIA DICHOTOMA G.FORST FRUIT MUCILAGE SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

Formulation and evaluation of oral dispersible tablets of aripiprazole

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF VALSARTAN TABLETS EMPLOYING CYCLODEXTRIN-POLOXAMER 407-PVP K30 INCLUSION COMPLEXES

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES

Design and development of fast Melting Tablets of Terbutaline Sulphate

Optimization of valsartan tablet formulation by 2 3 factorial design

Available Online through Research Article

Formulation and evaluation of sublingual tablets of lisinopril

REVERSE PHASE HPLC METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ALFUZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS

Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences

Formulation and Evaluation

Formulation and Evaluation of Rosuvastatin Immediate Release Tablets 10 Mg

Formulation and Evaluation of Amlodipine besylate orally disintegrating tablet

DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF CONTROLLED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF FLURBIPROFEN

Short Communication. Formulation of Furosemide Dispersible Tablets for Use in Paediatrics V. V. ABWOVA, P. N. MBEO, L. J. TIROP AND K. A. M.

ASSAY AND IMPURITY METHOD FOR DURACOR TABLETS BY HPLC

Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., 2013; 3(6):42-46 ISSN:

METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION BY RP-HPLC FOR ESTIMATION OF ZOLPIDEM TARTARATE

Received on: Accepted on:

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD ESTIMATION OF TOLVAPTAN IN BULK PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION

RP-HPLC Analysis of Temozolomide in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

K. Ravi Shankar et al. /BioMedRx 2013,1(3), Available online through

A HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC ASSAY FOR LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF MELT-IN-MOUTH TABLETS OF DOMPERIDONE CONTAINING MULTICOMPONENT INCLUSION COMPLEX

Karnataka Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, H.K.E. Society s College of Pharmacy, Gulbarga, Karnataka ABSTRACT KEYWORDS:

Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablet of aceclofenac

Formulation, Optimization and Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Tablet of Zidovudine

Chemate and Chowdary, IJPSR, 2012; Vol. 3(7): ISSN:

PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF STARCH - PEG 1500 CO-PROCESSED EXCIPIENT AS A NEW DIRECTLY COMPRESSIBLE VEHICLE IN TABLET FORMULATIONS

B. Jayakar et. al. FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ORODISPERSIBLE TABLET OF CELECOXIB R. Margret Chandira, Shyam Sharma, Debjit Bhowmik, B.

Pelagia Research Library

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010 FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ROSIGLITAZONE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLET

The Nitrofurantoin Capsules Revision Bulletin supersedes the currently official monograph.

Formulation and Development of Sustained Release Tablets of Valsartan Sodium

Design and In-vitro Evaluation of Silymarin Bilayer Tablets

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR ASSAY AND DISSOLUTION OF METOPROLOL SUCCINATE EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS

Formulation and Optimization of Immediate Release Tablet of Sitagliptin Phosphate using Response Surface Methodology

World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research SJIF Impact Factor 5.990

Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., 2012; 2(6): ISSN:

Tramadol Hydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets. Expert Committee Chemical Medicines Monographs 2 Reason for Revision Compliance

Quetiapine Tablets. Expert Committee Monographs Chemical Medicines 4 Reason for Revision Compliance

A Comparative Evaluation of Cross Linked Starch Urea-A New Polymer and Other Known Polymers for Controlled Release of Diclofenac

Scholars Research Library

A FACTORIAL STUDY ON THE ENHANCEMENT OF DISSOLUTION RATE OF KETOPROFEN BY SOLID DISPERSION IN COMBINED CARRIERS

Study of Disintegrant Property of Moringa Oleifera Gum and its Comparison with other Superdisintegrants

Preparation and Evaluation of Silymarin Controlled Release Tablets Prepared Using Natural Gums

OPTIMIZATION OF CONTROLLED RELEASE GASTRORETENTIVE BUOYANT TABLET WITH XANTHAN GUM AND POLYOX WSR 1105

Formulation And Evaluation Of Flurbiprofen Matrix Tablets For Colon Targeting

Estimation of Emtricitabine in Tablet Dosage Form by RP-HPLC

TENOFOVIR TABLETS: Final text for addition to The International Pharmacopoeia (June 2010)

Effect of superdisintegrants and their mode of incorporation on disintegration time and release profile of carbamazepine from immediate release tablet

372 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 4: ; October, 2014 Moazzem et al, 2014

ENHANCEMENT OF SOLUBILITY OF BICALUTAMIDE DRUG USING SOLID DISPERSION TECHNIQUE

Volume: I: Issue-2: Aug-Oct ISSN NOVEL APPROACH IN FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS OF ONDANSETRON HYDROCHLORIDE

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF LACOSAMIDE IN BULK AND ITS PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION

Formulation and Evaluation of Glicazide Mouth Dissolving Tablets

Volume: 2: Issue-3: July-Sept ISSN FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF NICORANDIL

Available Online through

ISSN: ; CODEN ECJHAO E-Journal of Chemistry 2011, 8(3),

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Available online Research Article

RITONAVIRI COMPRESSI RITONAVIR TABLETS. Final text for addition to The International Pharmacopoeia (July 2012)

EFFECT OF PVP ON CYCLODEXTRIN COMPLEXATION OF EFAVIRENZ FOR ENHANCING ITS SOLUBILITY AND DISSOLUTION RATE

Available online Research Article

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRAMADOL IN PURE AND PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS

Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Sitagliptin and Metformin in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form using RP-HPLC Method

A FACTORIAL STUDY ON ENHANCEMENT OF SOLUBILITY AND DISSOLUTION RATE OF IBUPROFEN BY β CYCLODEXTRIN AND SOLUTOL HS15

CHAPTER INTRODUCTION OF DOSAGE FORM AND LITERATURE REVIEW

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ACECLOFENAC SODIUM BILAYER SUSTAINED RELEASE TABLETS

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR THE ESTIMATION OF STRONTIUM RANELATE IN SACHET

Pavan K et al IJARPB: 2013, 3(2), ISSN: Available online on Research Article

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF CEFIXIME TRIHYDRATE ORAL DISINTEGRATING AGENTS

DEVELOPMENT OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF DROTAVERINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS

36 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 1: 36-42; January, 2014 Rao et al., 2014

This revision also necessitates a change in the table numbering in the test for Organic Impurities.

Design and Characterization of Valsartan Loaded Press Coated Pulsatile Tablets

Formulation and In-Vitro Evaluation of Leflunomide Tablet with Enhanced Dissolution

Reverse Phase HPLC Analysis of Atomoxetine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

Available online at Scholars Research Library

Scholars Research Library. Formulation Development of Pioglitazone Tablets Employing β Cyclodextrin- Poloxamer 407- PVP K30: A Factorial Study

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ETORICOXIB TABLETS EMPLOYING CYCLODEXTRIN- POLOXAMER PVPK30 INCLUSION COMPLEXES

Simultaneous estimation of Metformin HCl and Sitagliptin in drug substance and drug products by RP-HPLC method

DEVELOPMENT OF NON SODIUM EFFERVESCENT TABLET OF PARACETAMOL USING ARGININE CARBONATE

STUDY OF THE DETERIORATION OF ASPIRIN IN THE PRESENCE OF VARIOUS EXCIPIENTS

Validated RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Esomeprazole Enteric Coated Tablets

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS TOLBUTAMIDE IN PURE AND PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS

LubriTose Mannitol Michael Crowley, Director of R&D, Excipients

TECHNICAL INFORMATION RxCIPIENTS FM A versatile excipient for orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) formulations

Transcription:

IJPSR (2012), Vol. 3, Issue 06 (Research Article) Received on 02 February, 2012; received in revised form 27 May, 2012; accepted 29 May, 2012 FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ALLYLESTRENOL IMMEDIATE RELEASE TABLETS Bishwajit Bokshi and Aparajita Malakar* Pharmacy Discipline, Life Science School, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh ABSTRACT Keywords: Immediate release tablets; Allylestrenol; Crosscarmellose sodium; Crosspovidone; Pre gelatinized starch; Sodium starch glycolate Correspondence to Author: Aparajita Malakar Pharmacy Discipline, Life Science School Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh Among the different routes of administration, the oral route of administration continues to be the most preferred route due to various advantages including ease of ingestion, avoidance of pain, versatility and most importantly patient compliance. The different dosage forms include tablets and capsules. Recently immediate release tablets have started gaining popularity and acceptance as a drug delivery system, mainly because they are easy to administer and lead to better patient compliance. The present work involves the formulation development, optimization and in-vitro evaluation of immediate release allylestrenol tablets. To minimize critical process parameters and since allylestrenol is heat sensitive, direct compression method was selected for the formulation of immediate release allylestrenol tablets. Tablets were prepared using cross carmellose sodium, crosspovidone, pre gelatinized starch and sodium starch glycolate as disintegrants. During the course of study it was found that the formula G4 containing sodium starch glycolate as disintegrant exhibited acceptable disintegration time, percentage drug content per tablet and in vitro drug release. So at last it was concluded that immediate release allylestrenol tablets can be prepared using direct compression which met the required specifications. INTRODUCTION: An immediate release dosage form allows a manufacturer to extend market exclusivity, while offering patients a convenient dosage form or dosage regimen. Immediate release tablets are those tablets which are designed to disintegrate and release their medication with no special rate controlling features, such as special coatings and other techniques 1, 2. Immediate release and fast dispersing drug delivery system may offer a solution to these problems. Recently immediate release tablets have started gaining popularity and acceptance as a drug delivery system, mainly because they are easy to administer, has quick onset of action is economical and lead to better patient compliance. They are also a tool for expanding markets, extending product life cycles and generating opportunities 3, 4. Allylestrenol also known as allyloestrenol and allyl estrenol, is a synthetic progestogen sometimes used to prevent threatened miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss and premature labor 5 6. In men, it has also been studied as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, with encouraging results 7 8. It is chemically (17ß)-17-(prop-2-en-1-yl)estr-4-en- 17-ol. A survey of literature has revealed that there is no formulation and evaluation of Allylestrenol tablets. Available online on www.ijpsr.com 1679

The plan of present research is to develop a cost effective allylestrenol immediate release tablets by direct compression method. Direct compression is being studied for its simplicity, cost effectiveness and for its comparatively shorter process. Thus five different formulations were designed to obtain best optimized product. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials: Allylestrenol was kindly gifted by Renata Ltd, Bangladesh. Acetonitrile of HPLC grade and Methanol of analytical grade were purchased from E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Lactose was obtained from Reliance Ltd., Mumbai, India. Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102) and crosscarmellose sodium was purchased from Ashok Chem-Pharma International, Mumbai, India. Magnesium stearate and sodium starch glycolate were purchased fromamishi Drugs & chemicals Private Limited Ahmedabad, India. Pre gelatinized Starch and Crospovidone obtained from Hangzhou Starshine Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China, Ludipress was purchased from BASF AG, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Water was deionised and double distilled. All other ingredients used were of analytical grade. Preparation of Immediate Release Allylestrenol Tablets: Allylestrenol and lactose were accurately weighed, geometrically mixed and passed through #80 mesh and then, microcrystalline cellulose, disintegrants and ludipress were accurately weighed and passed through #20 mesh. Both mixtures were mixed in rapid mixer granulator for 10 minutes as a dry mixing. Then, colloidal anhydrous silica (aerosil 200) and magnesium stearate was passed through #40 mesh; added to the mixture in the rapid mixer granulator and mixed for 5 minutes. Then the granules were compressed into tablets using 16 stations rotary compressed machine with punch size 6.0 mm. Evaluation of Immediate Release Allylestrenol Tablets: 1. Uniformity of Weight: Individually 20 tablets were weighted at random using Sartorious balance (Model CP- 224 S). Average weight was determined. Determinations were made in triplicate. Limit - Not more than 2 of the individual masses deviate from the average mass by more than the 7.5 % and none deviates by more than 15% 9. 2. Tablet Hardness: Automatic Tablet Hardness Tester (8M, Dr. Schleuniger, Switzerland) was used to determine the crushing strength. 6 tablets were randomly selected from each formulation and the pressure at which each tablet crushed was recorded. Determinations were made in triplicate. Limit - At least 5 kg. 3. Tablet Friability: 20 tablets of each formulation were weighed and subjected to abrasion by employing a Veego friabilator (VFT-2, India) at 25 rev/min for 4 min. The tablets were then weighed and compared with their initial weights and percentage friability was obtained. Determination was made in triplicate. Limit - The weight loss should not be more than 1 %. 4. In-vitro Disintegration Test: 6 tablets from each formulation were employed for the test in distilled water at 37 C using Tablet Disintegration Tester (Model: VDT-2, Veego, India). The time required for disintegrating the tablet and passing completely through the sieve was recorded. Limit - Not more than 30 minutes 10. 5. Pharmaceutical Assay: The instrument used for the study was HPLC (Agilent) having 1100 series HPLC pump, auto sampler equipped with a 100 μl sample loop, dual absorbance detector, output signal was monitored and integrated using chemstation software on a XTerra RP18 column (150 4.6 mm, 5μm particle size). Mobile phase was prepared by mixing HPLC grade water and HPLC grade acetonitrile in the ratio of 20:80 v/v. The mobile phase was sonicated for 10 min and filtered through 0.2μm Nylon 6, 6 membrane filter before use. For the preparation of standard stock solution about 20 mg of allylestrenol WS was weighed accurately into a 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved and diluted to volume with mobile Available online on www.ijpsr.com 1680

phase to obtain a concentration of 200μg/ml. This stock solution was further diluted to 100 ml with mobile phase to obtain a concentration of 10 μg/ml and filtered through 0.20μm PTFE membrane filter (hydrophilic). For the preparation of sample solution four tablets equivalent to 20 mg of allylestrenol were weighed and transferred into a 100 ml volumetric flask; 60 ml of mobile phase was added and sonicated with occasional shaking for 15 min. The solution was cooled to room temperature and diluted to volume with the mobile phase. The solution was filtered through Whatman Grade 1 Filter Paper. 5 ml of this solution was diluted to 100 ml with mobile phase. The final solution was through 0.20 μm PTFE membrane filter (hydrophilic). The HPLC analysis was performed on Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid ChromatoGraphic System with isocratic elution mode using a mobile phase on X-Terra RP18 column (150 4.6 mm, 5μm particle size) with 1.5 ml/min flow rate at 205 nm using UV detector. A 100 μl volume of above sample solution and standard solution were injected into HPLC and peak areas were measured under optimized chromatographic conditions. Limit 90% to 110% of the label amount 6. In-vitro Dissolution Study: The release rate of allylestrenol from immediate release tablets was determined using United State Pharmacopoeia (USP) XXIV dissolution testing apparatus II (Paddle method). The dissolution test was performed using 500 ml of 1.0% sodium lauryl sulphate in water, at 37±0.5 o C and 100 rpm. A sample (10 ml) of the solution was withdrawn from the dissolution apparatus 5, 10, 20, 30 and 45 minutes. The samples were replaced with fresh dissolution medium of same quantity. The samples were filtered through a 0.20μm PTFE membrane filter (hydrophilic). A 100 μl volume of above sample solution was injected into HPLC and peak areas were measured under optimized chromato-graphic conditions as per assay method. Cumulative percentage of drug release was calculated. Limit - Not less than 75% of labeled amount of allylestrenol was dissolved in 45 min. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the present study, various formulations of immediate release allylestrenol tablets were prepared by direct compression. We have chosen to use ludipress because the flow of the material is very good, resulting in the production of tablets with good mechanical resistance and low friability, with an immediate drug release. The use of super disintegrants for preparation of immediate release tablets is highly effective and commercially feasible. These super disintegrants accelerate disintegration of tablets by virtue of their ability to absorb a large amount of water when exposed to an aqueous environment. The absorption of water results in breaking of tablets and therefore faster disintegration. This disintegration is reported to have an effect on dissolution characteristics as well (Table 2, figure 1). Flow properties of the powder, resistance to particle movement can be judged from the angle of repose. Based on angle of repose it was observed that G4 showed excellent flow properties than the rest of formulations. Carr's index of the prepared blends falls in the range of 10.56 to 18.09% and Hausner factor values were in the range of 1.12 to 1.23. Based on the results obtained we can conclude that G4 showed excellent flow. Disintegration time is very important for immediate release tablets as it assists swallowing and also plays a role in increasing drug absorption, thus promoting bioavailability. Disintegration time of prepared tablets was within the range (Table 3). In-vitro drug release study on the prepared tablets were done using 1% sodium lauryl sulphate in water as medium, at 37±0.5 o C from the results it was observed that G4 showed maximum drug release of 93.20% which was higher than other formulations (Table 1). Available online on www.ijpsr.com 1681

TABLE 1: FORMULAE FOR PREPARATION OF IMMEDIATE RELEASE ALLYLESTRENOL TABLETS Sl. No Ingredients (mg/tablet) Batch Code G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 1. Allylestrenol 5 mg 5 mg 5 mg 5 mg 5 mg 2. Lactose 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg 3. Ludipress 49.5 mg 49.5 mg 49.5 mg 49.5 mg 49.5 mg 4. Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102) 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg 5. Colloidal anhydrous Silica (Aerosil 200) 1.5 mg 1.5 mg 1.5 mg 1.5 mg 1.5 mg 6. Magnesium Stearate 1 mg 1 mg 1 mg 1 mg 1 mg 7. Croscarmellose sodium 3 mg - - - - 8. Crosspovidone - 3 mg - - - 9. Pre gelatinized Starch - - 3 mg - - 10. Sodium-starch glycolate - - - 3 mg - Total weight 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg TABLE 2: DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF FORMULATIONS Formulation Code Time in minutes 5 10 20 30 45 G1 3.56% 53.25% 70.25% 83.52% 90.02% G2 3.45% 52.45% 73.19% 84.26% 91.45% G3 4.51% 49.04% 57.26% 78.81% 88.54% G4 4.65% 55.21% 74.75% 88.25% 93.20% G5 1.23% 45.18% 55.26% 75.61% 85.23% TABLE 3: EVALUATION OF POST-COMPRESSION PARAMETERS Evaluation of post -compression Parameters Formulation Code Hardness of tablets (kg/cm 2 ) Friability of tablets (%) Weight variation (mg) ± % deviation Percent drug content per tablets (%) Drug content per tablets (mg) Thickness of tablets (mm) Disintegration time (mm) G1 7.3 0.787 95.95 mg ± 1.91% 99.46 4.973 3.08 3.54 G2 7.4 0.845 96.02 mg ±1.78% 98.98 4.949 3.07 3.55 G3 7.7 0.595 96.54 mg ±1.15% 99.86 4.993 3.09 4.17 G4 7.5 0.540 95.24 mg ±1.04% 99.98 4.999 3.08 2.55 G5 7.9 1.267 96.09 mg ±2.21% 99.24 4.962 3.07 5.42 It was also observed that direct compression was the best suitable method used for producing immediate release allylestrenol tablets since it is cost effective and less time consuming. Based on all the above considerations these formulas can be subjected for bioavailability studies and if it complies to all the requirement of those studies the same formula can be commercialized. FIGURE 1: DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF FORMULATIONS CONCLUSION: Considering some important parameters like disintegration time (2.55 min), percentage drug content per tablet (99.98%), in vitro drug release (93.20%) and cost factor G4 containing Sodium-starch glycolate as disintegrant was selected as the best formulation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors would like to express their gratitude to Prof. Dr. Samir Kumar Sadhu, Head of the Department, Pharmacy Discipline, Life Science School, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh, for providing required facilities to carry out this research work. REFERENCES: 1. Y.Fu, S.Yang, S.H.Jeong, S.Kimura, K.Park, Crit: Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, 2004, 21: 433-476. 2. Shishu, A.Bhatti, Indian Drugs, 2006, 43: 643-648. Available online on www.ijpsr.com 1682

3. D. Douroumis D, Expert.Opin Drug Deliv, 2007, 4: 417-426. 4. Y. Katsuragi, Y. Sugiura, C.Lee, K.Otsuji, K.Kurihara, Pharm Res, 1995, 12: 658-662. 5. Sean, C.S; Martindale, The complete drug Reference; Thirty-six edition; Pharmaceutical Press, London; 2005. 6. Cortés-Prieto J, Bosch AO, Rocha JA: Allylestrenol: three years of experience with Gestanon in threatened abortion and premature labor. Clinical Therapeutics, 1980; 3: 200-208. 7. Fukuoka H, Ishibashi Y, Shiba T, Tuchiya F, Sakanishi S: Clinical study of allylestrenol (Perselin) on patients with prostatic hypertrophy. Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica, 1993; 39: 679-683. 8. Noguchi K, Takeda M, Hosaka M, Kubota Y: Clinical effects of allylestrenol on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) evaluated with criteria for treatment efficacy in BPH. Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica, 2002; 48: 269-273. 9. British Pharmacopoeia 2005, Vol. I, Published by the Stationery Office, London. 2005,697-698. 10. United State Pharmacopoeia-27, NF-22. The United State Pharmacopoeial Convention: Rockville 2004; 2645-2646. ************************** Available online on www.ijpsr.com 1683