Primary Physiological

Similar documents
Dietary recommendations in Obesity, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Diabetes. Stephen D. Sisson MD

Part 1: Obesity. Dietary recommendations in Obesity, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Diabetes 10/15/2018. Objectives.

Using the New Hypertension Guidelines

Module 2. Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Reduction in Women with Hypertension

The prevalence of obesity in adults has doubled over the past 30 years

Implications of The LookAHEAD Trial: Is Weight Loss Beneficial for Patients with Diabetes?

Impact of Lifestyle Modification to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Event Risk of High Risk Patients with Low Levels of HDL C

Hypertension Management Controversies in the Elderly Patient

How do we adapt diet approaches for patients with obesity with or without diabetes? Therese Coleman Dietitian

Review Article Weight Loss Maintenance in African American Women: A Systematic Review of the Behavioral Lifestyle Intervention Literature

2016 EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON CVD PREVENTION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

ISCHEMIC VASCULAR DISEASE (IVD) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

CVD Risk Assessment. Michal Vrablík Charles University, Prague Czech Republic

The Need for Balance in Evaluating the Evidence on Na and CVD

SIGN 149 Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Quick Reference Guide July Evidence

2013 Hypertension Measure Group Patient Visit Form

American Diabetes Association: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2015

Hypertension JNC 8 (2014)

Health Benefits of Lowering Sodium Intake in the US

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Tim Church, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D. John S. McIlhenny Endowed Chair Pennington Biomedical Research Center

No relevant financial relationships


Optimizing risk assessment of total cardiovascular risk What are the tools? Lars Rydén Professor Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden

Diversity and HTN: Approaches to optimal BP control in AfricanAmericans

The Metabolic Syndrome: Is It A Valid Concept? YES

7/6/2012. University Pharmacy 5254 Anthony Wayne Drive Detroit, MI (313)

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL MEDICINE WELCOMES

Value of cardiac rehabilitation Prof. Dr. L Vanhees

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Blood Pressure LIMBO How Low To Go?

Achieving a Culture of Employee Health and Wellness

Diabetes and Hypertension

New Hypertension Guideline Recommendations for Adults July 7, :45-9:30am

Steps Against Recurrent Stroke (STARS)

Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives. Guidelines. Update on Lifestyle Guidelines

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

Exercise Studies Where Walking is Better than Running: Does Intensity Matter?

Case Study #4: Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines

Hypertension in 2015: SPRINT-ing ahead of JNC-8. MAJ Charles Magee, MD MPH FACP Director, WRNMMC Hypertension Clinic

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

Key Elements in Managing Diabetes

Preventive Cardiology Scientific evidence

ASSeSSing the risk of fatal cardiovascular disease

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Cardiac Rehabilitation & Exercise Training in Congenital Heart Disease. Jidong Sung Division of Cardiology Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Blood Pressure Acre Surgery Diviash Thakrar

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension - Pocket Guide Update 2004 Revision July 2005

Figure S1. Comparison of fasting plasma lipoprotein levels between males (n=108) and females (n=130). Box plots represent the quartiles distribution

The basics Great exercise resource The environment has changed Aerobic exercise What about weight lifting?

Hypertension with Comorbidities Treatment of Metabolic Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents

HEART HEALTH AND HEALTHY EATING HABITS

The Evidence for Populationwide Reduction in Sodium Intake: Why All the Fuss?

Contributions of diet to metabolic problems in survivors of childhood cancer

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

Metabolic Syndrome: A Preventable & Treatable Cluster of Conditions

Project Summary: Draft Proposal Continued RESULTS. on the DASH Diet and 30 of the 40 original subjects on the Pro-DASH Diet.

Tim Church, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D. Baton Rouge, LA

6/5/2014. Exercise and Metabolic Management DECLINE IN DEATHS. Regular exercise has health benefits for individuals of every weight

OBESITY: The Growing Epidemic and its Medical Impact

Put your Heart before your Head

major public health burden

CHRONIC HEART FAILURE : WHAT ELSE COULD WE OFFER TO OUR PATIENTS? Cardiac Rehabilitation Society of Thailand

New Recommendations for the Treatment of Hypertension: From Population Salt Reduction to Personalized Treatment Targets

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD CHOLESTEROL: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW GUIDELINES

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Comparison Analysis Between Baseline & Follow-up

Cardiovascular System and Health. Chapter 15

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN

HYPERTENSION: ARE WE GOING TOO LOW?

Expert panels sponsored by both the World Health

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

Prevention of MACROvascular Complications of Diabetes

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

Models of preventive care in clinical practice to achieve 25 by 25

New Hypertension Guidelines. Kofi Osei, MD

APCCRC. Physical Activity as a Vital Sign : Really It Does Matter. Jong-Young LEE, MD, PhD

Student Paper PRACTICE-BASED RESEARCH

Fructose, Uric Acid and Hypertension in Children and Adolescents

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

What is hypertension?

NUTRITION IN THE AGE OF EVIDENCE D A N A H. M A N N I N G P H A R M. D., R. D., L D N

Hypertension. Does it Matter What Medications We Use? Nishant K. Sekaran, M.D. M.Sc. Intermountain Heart Institute

Disorders of Lipid Metabolism Toolkit Table of Contents

to exercise (maybe) David Nunan PhD Research Fellow

Agenda. Background Program Strategy Interim Outcomes Lessons Learned Future Challenges Questions

Clinical Practice Guideline

Cardiac Pathophysiology

Primary Outcome Results of DiRECT the Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial

Chapter 08. Health Screening and Risk Classification

Myths, Heart Disease and the Latino Population. Maria T. Vivaldi MD MGH Women s Heart Health Program. Hispanics constitute 16.3 % of US population!

Edward Melanson, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes University of Colorado Denver

Reframe the Paradigm of Hypertension treatment Focus on Diabetes

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Trends In CVD, Related Risk Factors, Prevention and Control In China

Risk Factors for Heart Disease

What s In the New Hypertension Guidelines?

Transcription:

Appendix Table 3. Primary outcomes and effect sizes for trials included in review. Trial Behavior Outcome Effect size Group difference in original units Primary Physiological ACT 22, a Be Fit, Be Well 32 Met moderate or vigorous physical activity recommendations N, S Medication adherence scale B,S Effect Size Outcome 0.4 (.03,.77) 25.7% vs 14.3% VO2 (ml/min) 0.32 (.08,.57) 0.38 (.13,.63).85units different on medication adherence scale BPTEACH 33 Systolic blood pressure N,O Weight 0.25 (.01,.50) 0.22 (0.18, 0.61) Group difference in original units Weight change effect size Group difference in kg Morbidity 80.7 ml/min 1.05 kg 0.25 (.01,.50) 1.05 kg 9.44 mmhg DEER 34 Caloric intake B,S 0.48 (.07,.91) 172 kcal/day LDL-C 0.62 12 mg/dl 0.99 (.55, 1.4) 3.9 kg (.19,1.05) DISH 35, b Weight 0.83(.48,1.2) 3.5 kg 0.83(.48,1.2) 3.5 kg Remain normotens ive without drugs - DPP 15,36 Energy intake B,S 0.23 (0.15,0.32) 201 kcal/day Weight 0.81 (0.73,0.90) 5.4 kg 0.81 (0.73,0.90) 5.4 kg Diagnosis of Diabetes - EICHD 37 Depression B,S 0.33 (.25,.41) 2.8 points on Beck Depression Fatal or non-fatal myocardia l infarction - HARP 38 Pill count N,O 0.04 (- 2% more adhered Mortality

.16,.25) HART 39 Sodium N,S 0.31(.14,.49) 10% more met goal Systolic blood pressure N,O HCP 40 Sodium 1.12(.72,1.5) 1839 mg/day Diastolic blood pressure Health Literacy 41,42 Self-care behavior B,S 0.56 (0.38, 0.73) 1.4 points on selfcare scale 0.11(-.01,.24) 2.6 mm Hg 0 (-.13,.13) 0 kg N,O Heart failure or hospitaliza tion - 0.22 1.5 mm Hg 0.82 (.45,1.9) 3.8 kg Remain normotens ive without drugs - Hospitaliz ations - Help PD 43, c Glucose mg/dl 0.44 (.22,.67) 4.35 mg/dl 0.68(.45,.91) 4.2 kg Diagnosis of Diabetes - HF- ACTION 44, d 6min walk 0.32 (0.2, 0.41) 14 meters VO2 (ml/kg/min) 0.34 (0.25, 0.42) 0.4 ml/kg/min CV event or hospitaliza tion - HOME_BP 45 Blood pressure 0.09 (- 25% of tx had bp control N,O.15,.33) control vs 22% con HOPP 46 Smoking B,S 0.22 (.03,.41) 9% remained abstinent HPT 47 Sodium 0.32 (0.11,0.53) 5.5 mmol Blood pressure N,O 0.21 (0.0,0.42) 1.7 mmhg -0.11 (-0.32, 0.09) 0.27 kg N,O Hypertens ion - Htn Prev 48 Sodium -0.63 (-0.99,- 0.33) 700mg/d Blood pressure -0.31 (-0.60, - 0.03) 2 mm Hg -0.68 (-0.97, - 0.39) 2.7 kg Hypertens ion - ICAN 49 Weight 0.42 3.0 kg 0.42 3.0 kg (0.09,0.75) (0.09,0.75) IN Completed FU 0.42 65.1% vs 46.7%

Look Ahead 2,3,51,52, f Mediterrane an Lifestyle 53-55 MRFIT 56-59, g Optimal Exercise Regimens 60 PAD_RF 31 Physical activity (kcal/week) B,S Adherence to Mediterranean diet scale B,S Smoking cessation 0.34 (0.29,0.40) 0.77 (0.52,1.02) 0.66(0.59,0.7 2) 18 kcal Weight (kg) 0.36 768.9 kcal/wk Change in METS 0.59 from sub-max (0.53,0.64) treadmill 0.86 point increase with possibly scale range 0-7 31% vs 12% quit rate Weight (kg at 6 mos) Blood pressure (Diastolic) VO2 max (ml/kg/min) Increased dose or use of med (adherence) 0.94 (.61, 1.27) 0.35(0.11,0.5 9) 0.41 (0.38,0.45) 0.58 (0.14,1.03) 2.1 kg 0.36 15.1 METS 0.78 (0.72,0.84) 2.1 kg 7.9 % weight reduction Composit e of cardiovas cular events - 1.77 kg 0.35(0.11,0.59 1.77 kg 3.8 mmhg Definite, fatal AMI - 2.0 ml/kg/min -.09 (-.53,.34).3kg/m 2 N,O 53.8% vs 17.5% LDL-C 0.36 (.08,.63) 10.5 mg/dl PAD Treadmill 61 6 min walk (m) 0.69 (0.29, 1.08) 36.2m Brachial artery flow (mm) 0.22 (-0.16, 0.61) POWER 62 Weight -0.89 (-1.16, -.63) CONTROL 50 appointment (0.16,0.66) ireach 23,e Diet (kcal) N,O 0.03(- 0.18,0.25) POWER- UP 63,i Weight N,O -0.16 (-0.40, 0.08) PREMIER 64 Fruit & Veg B,S 0.78 (0.59,0.97) SCRIP 65 % Kcal Fat B,S -1.09 (- 1.36,0.82) 2.5 servings/day Blood pressure (Systolic) 7.8% kcal fat Minimal diameter change 0.47 (0.30, 0.64) 0.30 (0.05,0.55).06 mm 4.5 kg -0.89 (-1.16, -.63) 1.1kg -0.16 (-0.40, 0.08) 4.3 mmhg -1.01(-1.20,- 0.81).069 mm -1.02 (-1.29,- 0.76) 4.5 kg Hospitaliz ations - 1.1kg N,O 4.7 kg 3.9 kg Hospitaliz ations-

SWCP 66 Energy intake B,S -0.92 (-1.38,-.45) 2213 kj/day CHD risk (using Framingham equations) -1.11 (-1.58,-.64) -22.4 events/1000 persons( -1.98 (-2.51, - 1.44) 10.4 kg TCYB 67,h Bp controlled 11% more of tx group had controlled blood pressure TELE-HF 68 Readmissi TOHP 69, j Blood pressure(systolic) TOURS 70 Self-monitoring 0.32 (0.01, 29 more days of Weight regain 0.43 (0.12, records 0.63) self-monitoring 0.74) TLC 71 Attendance VO2 max 0.38 (-0.2, WHI-DM 72 % fat intake B,S 1.51 (1.49,1.53) (ml/kg/min) N,O 10.7% Blood pressure (Diastolic) -2.7 mmhg -0.92 (-1.04, - 0.80) 0.77) 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) 2.5 kg 0.43 (0.12, 0.74) 0.8 ml/kg/min 0.08 (-0.25, 0.41) -0.31 mmhg 0.14 (0.12, 0.16) on - 4.5 kg Onset of hypertensi on - 2.5 kg 1.0 kg N,O 1.29 kg Fatal & non-fatal CHD, CVD, stroke - 1.5 kg WLM 73, k % Kcals N,S -33 Kcal/day Weight 0.27 (0.12,0.42) 1.5 kg 0.27 (0.12,0.42) Data in cells are the primary outcome, calculated effect sizes and reported change in original trial units for the behavioral, physiological and weight outcomes. Super-scripted letters represent whether measure was objective or self-reported and whether outcome was a significant benefit or null. For morbidity outcomes, we include the specific outcome measure and whether null or significant benefit. If the trial was powered to analyze all-cause mortality, we included whether there was a significant benefit or not. = Not reported; N = ; B = Significant ; H = Harm; O = Objective; S = Self-reported a. ACT Behavior effect size calculated from proportions percent of participants meeting moderate or vigorous physical activity recommendations post-intervention b. DISH Two intervention arms weight control and sodium control. Outcomes for weight control arm reported in table. For sodium control arm, behavioral outcome was urinary sodium output which was significantly improved in treatment versus controls and more of the intervention group remained normotensive but not statistically different than controls. c. Help-PD Intensive intervention was the first 6 months. Main outcome paper reports data every 6 month but conducted statistical analyses for the 18 & 24 month data. Data reported for weight and physiological outcome (glucose) was the adjusted means over 18 and 24 month follow-up. d. HF action The main outcome paper reported median and IQR for the behavior (distance walked) and physiological variable (peak oxygen consumption). We calculated effect sizes based on a normal

distribution assumption. e. ireach Study authors compared an in-person to an internet or internet in-person hybrid study. Authors evaluated how well an internet-deliver would do compared with an in person version. We coded the in person arm as the treatment arm and the internet-delivery arm as the control f. Look Ahead Two different follow-up periods were included. Behavior outcome VO2 and weight reported at 12 mos; Cardiovascular events and mortality reported at final follow-up (max 13.5 years, median 9.6 years) g. MRFIT - Behavior and physiological outcomes reported at 12 mos; AMIs reported at 7 years; and mortality reported at original follow-up (max 6 years) h.tcyb Insufficient data presented to calculate blood pressure effect sizes. i. POWER-UP Comparison groups are brief lifestyle counseling versus usual care. The end of intensive intervention was considered 12 months. The enhanced brief lifestyle counseling was not considered the treatment group because it differed from lifestyle counseling by the addition of meal replacements. There were no significant differences on weight between brief lifestyle counseling and usual care, but there was a significant difference on weight between usual care and enhanced lifestyle counseling (with meal replacements). Significant differences were observed at the 6 month assessment. j. TOHP - Insufficient data presented to calculate blood pressure effect sizes. k. WLM - Insufficient data presented to calculate change in percent kcals effect sizes. Trial titles from registry or publications for each acronym. Some trials did not provide a short title or acronym; therefore study authors created a condensed title: ACT 22 =Activity counseling trial; Be Fit, Be Well 32 = Evaluating a blood pressure reduction and weight loss program in a low income, ethnically diverse population; BPTEACH 33 = Baltimore partnership to educate and achieve control of hypertension; DEER 34 = Diet and exercise for elevated risk; DISH 35 = Dietary intervention study for hypertension; DPP 15,36 = Diabetes prevention program; EICHD 37 = Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients; HARP 38 = Hypertension and adherence in rural practice; HART 39 = Heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial; HCP 40 = Hypertension control program; Health Literacy 41,42 = Health literacy and self-management in heart failure; Help PD 43 = Healthy living partnerships to prevent diabetes; HF-ACTION 44 = Heart failure: A controlled trial investigating outcomes of exercise training (HF-ACTION); HOME_BP 45 = Home-based blood pressure interventions for African Americans; HOPP 46 = Healthy options for pregnancy and parenting; HPT 47 = Hypertension prevention trial; Htn Prev 48 = Primary prevention of hypertension by nutritional-hygienic means; ICAN 49 = Improving control with activity and nutrition; IN CONTROL 50 = Hypertension reduction in inner city Seattle; ireach 23 = Internet assisted obesity treatment; Look Ahead 2,3,51,52 = Action for health in diabetes; Mediterranean Lifestyle 53-55 = Effect of the Mediterranean lifestyle program on multiple risk behaviors and psychosocial outcomes; MRFIT 56-59 = Multiple risk factor intervention trial; Optimal Exercise Regimens 60 = Optimal exercise regimens for persons at increased risk; PAD_RF 31 = Reducing risk factors in peripheral arterial disease; PAD Treadmill 61 = Improving functioning in peripheral arterial disease; POWER 62 = Practice-based opportunities for weight reduction; POWER-UP 63 = Practice-based opportunities for weight reduction trial at the University of Pennsylvania; PREMIER 64 = Lifestyle intervention blood pressure control; SCRIP 65 = Stanford coronary risk intervention project; SWCP 66 = Stanford weight control program; TCYB 67 = Take control of your blood pressure study; TELE-HF 68 = Yale heart failure tele-monitoring study; TOHP 69 = Trials of hypertension prevention, phase II; TOURS 70 = Treatment of obesity in underserved rural settings; Training Level Comparison 71 = Training level comparison Trial; WHI-DM 72 = Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial; WLM 73 = Weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial